20 TASMANIA 40ºsouth Great Southern Land
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
IUCN S07: TASMANIAN WILDERNESS (Revision to Existing
WORLD HERITAGE NOMINATION - IUCN S07: TASMANIAN WILDERNESS (Revision to existing Property inscribed in 1982) Summary prepared by IUCN (April 1989) based on the original nomination submitted by the Government of Australia. This original and all documents presented in support of this nomination will be available for consultation at the meeting of the Bureau and the Committee. Note: In the light of the Bureau's concurrence with proposals to further extend the nominated site, the State Party's nomination of 1,374,000 ha in total, further revised in September 1989, is discussed in the IUCN Technical Evaluation. 1. LOCATION Comprises a contiguous network of reserved lands that extends over much of south-western Tasmania. including five national parks (Cradle Mountain-Lake St Clair, Franklin-Lower Gordon Wild Rivers, Southwest, Walls of Jerusalem and Hartz Mountains), four state reserves (Devils Gullet, Marakoopa Cave, Exit Cave and Port Davey) and part of Liffey Falls State Reserve, four conservation areas (Central Plateau, Oakleigh Creek, Southwest and St. Clair Lagoon), and"a number of protected areas, forest reserves as well as land verted in the Hydro-Electric Commission. Several outliers are included in the nominated area: Sarah Island Historic Site .in Macquarie Harbour; and lIe du Golfe, De Witt Island, Flat Witch Island and Maatsukyer Island off the south coast of Tasmania. Lake Gordon and some land adjoining it in the centre of this network has been developed for hydro-electric purposes and is excluded. 41°3S'-43°40'S, l4S02S'-l46°55'E. 2. JURIDICAL DATA Apart from approximately 330ha of privately-owned land in the Vale of Rasselas, on the Central Plateau and at Pillinger, land is publicly owned and includes 773,215ha under national parks, 2074h under state reserves, c. -
Ultimate Cruising Guests Also Receive: Chauffeur Driven Luxury Car Transfers from Your Home to the Airport and Return (Within 35Km) Cruise Highlights
ultimatecruising.com.au or call us on 1300 485 846 FROM $15,996pp Package #408 Revel in the opportunity to tread some of Tasmania’s greatest coastal tracks while you circumnavigate this island state by sea. Land on remote pristine beaches; trek through coastal heath, buttongrass moorlands, lush temperate rainforests and tall eucalypt woodlands; and drink in the stunning vistas from towering dolerite peaks. Explore islands whose only permanent inhabitants include Bennett’s wallabies, wombats, potoroos, possums and pademelons. Cruise the wild, storm-swept coastlines and sheltered, shimmering bays. Experience a variety of trekking treasures on Bruny, Flinders and Maria Islands. Delight in the raucousness of an Australian fur seal colony’s rocky haul-out on the Hunter Islands; the gregariousness of the gannets at Pedra Branca; and the majesty of a soaring shy albatross in the skies above Mewstone. Create and collate a treasured suite of memories – on foot or by sea – with extraordinary adventures on offer each day. This expedition is subject to regulatory approval and only open to Australian and New Zealand residents. Highlights include: Head off the ‘mother ship’ each day for a range of adventures and explorations that may include hiking options, wildlife watching, Zodiac cruises, diving^, snorkelling^, climbing^ or kayaking^ Access some of the best (and least) known walks in Tasmania, including those on Bruny, Flinders and Maria Islands, and the Hunter and Kent Island Groups On Maria Island – nicknamed Tasmania’s “Noah’s Ark” – enjoy an -
Conservation of Natural Wilderness Values in the Port Davey Marine and Estuarine Protected Area, South-Western Tasmania
AQUATIC CONSERVATION: MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS Aquatic Conserv: Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 20: 297–311 (2010) Published online 3 December 2009 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/aqc.1079 Conservation of natural wilderness values in the Port Davey marine and estuarine protected area, south-western Tasmania GRAHAM J. EDGARa,b,Ã, PETER R. LASTc, NEVILLE S. BARRETTb, KAREN GOWLETT-HOLMESc, MICHAEL DRIESSENd and PETER MOONEYe aAquenal Pty Ltd, GPO Box 828, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7001 bTasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252-49, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7001 cCSIRO Divison of Marine and Atmospheric Research, Castray Esplanade, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7000 dDepartment of Primary Industries and Water, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7000 eParks and Wildlife Service, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7000 ABSTRACT 1. Port Davey and associated Bathurst Harbour in south-western Tasmania represent one of the world’s most anomalous estuarine systems owing to an unusual combination of environmental factors. These include: (i) large uninhabited catchment protected as a National Park; (ii) ria geomorphology but with fjord characteristics that include a shallow entrance and deep 12-km long channel connecting an almost land-locked harbour to the sea; (iii) high rainfall and riverine input that generate strongly-stratified estuarine conditions, with a low-salinity surface layer and marine bottom water; (iv) a deeply tannin-stained surface layer that blocks light penetration to -
Paradoxes of Protection Evolution of the Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service and National Parks and Reserved Lands System
Paradoxes of Protection Evolution of the Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service and National Parks and Reserved Lands System By Dr Louise Crossley May 2009 A Report for Senator Christine Milne www.christinemilne.org.au Australian Greens Cover image: Lake Gwendolen from the track to the summit of Frenchmans Cap, Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Photo: Matt Newton Photography Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 1 1. THE INITIAL ESTABLISHMENT OF PARKS AND RESERVES; UTILITARIANS VERSUS CONSERVATIONISTS 1915-1970....................................................................... 3 1.1 The Scenery Preservation Board as the first manager of reserved lands ............................................................ 3 1.2 Extension of the reserved lands system ................................................................................................................... 3 1.3The wilderness value of wasteland ........................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Inadequacies of the Scenery Protection Board ...................................................................................................... 4 2. THE ESTABLISHMENT AND ‘GLORY DAYS’ OF THE NATIONAL PARKS AND WILDLIFE SERVICE 1971-81 ........................................................................................... 6 2.1 The demise of the Scenery Preservation Board and the Lake Pedder controversy -
Western Field Ornithologists April 2020 Newsletter
Western Field Ornithologists April 2020 Newsletter Message from WFO President Kurt Leuschner The coronavirus pandemic is now impacting society in serious and profound ways. Every day we learn more about this virus, its toll on society, and the habits we need to practice in order to minimize its spread. As you learned from our earlier message, the WFO board decided that we must postpone our annual conference that was set to be held in September in Reno. We did this to protect the health of our members and to protect WFO from a potentially significant financial loss. We’re very disheartened that we had to cancel what was to be our 50th anniversary celebration of the founding of Western Field Ornithologists. The venue was exciting, we were organizing wonderful field trips led by stellar leaders, speakers were on tap, and we looked forward to seeing old friends and the chance to make new ones. Our annual WFO conference is a signature annual accomplishment and we are fully aware of how important this yearly event is for everyone. WFO is both a scientific and a social organization. Interacting with one another and enjoying each other’s company is a key reason many of us are part of the WFO. This newsletter and others to follow are one way we can keep the WFO community engaged and further our mission even though we may not physically see many of you again until 2021. In the meantime, I hope you enjoy the articles and updates, the artwork, the information on some of our board members, and the art and writings by several young scholars. -
Melaleuca Site and Rehabilitation Plan 2014
Melaleuca Site and Rehabilitation Plan Southwest National Park Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Melaleuca Site and Rehabilitation Plan This site and rehabilitation plan applies to Melaleuca which lies in the Southwest National Park and the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. It applies to the Melaleuca Visitor Services Zone as well as the former Rallinga mining lease area and nearby sites used for recreational, conservation or operational purposes. The plan has been prepared, as agreed with the Commonwealth Government, to facilitate mining rehabilitation works; to improve visitors’ experiences in the Melaleuca area; and, to guide site management. Peter Mooney General Manager Tasmania Parks and Wildlife Service ISBN 978-0-9923628-1-2 (print version) ISBN 978-0-9923628-2-9 (pdf version) © State of Tasmania 2014 Cover photo: Moth Creek by A.Turbett Published by: Parks and Wildlife Service Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment GPO Box 1751 Hobart TASMANIA 7001 Melaleuca Site and Rehabilitation Plan Contents Visitor Experience Statement ................................................................................................ 1 Summary ................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction and reserve management framework ...................................................... 4 1.1 Significance of Melaleuca ................................................................................................................................. -
Strategic Plan
Strategic Plan 2018-2021 Outside cover image: Pandani and views from Mount Anne, Southwest National Park. Inside cover image: Grass Point is a family-friendly walk, South Bruny Island National Park. CONTENTS 1 _________ MESSAGE FROM THE PREMIER OF TASMANIA 3 ________ MESSAGE FROM THE DEPUTY SECRETARY 5 ________OUR CONSERVATION FOOTPRINT 6 ________OUR ROLE & RESPONSIBILITIES 7 ________OUR CORPORATE OBJECTIVES 8 ________OUR PRINCIPLES 11 _______INTEGRATED PLANNING 12 _______OUR ASPIRATIONS 15 _______OUR GOALS 17 _______ GOAL 1 – INSPIRING AND ENJOYABLE EXPERIENCES FOR VISITORS 23 ______ GOAL 2 – A HEALTHY, RESILIENT AND UNIQUELY TASMANIAN LANDSCAPE 29 ______ GOAL 3 – PRODUCTIVE AND SUSTAINABLE LAND USE THAT BENEFITS TASMANIA’S ECONOMY 35 ______ GOAL 4 – OUR ESTATE IS RELEVANT TO, AND VALUED BY, OUR COMMUNITIES 43 ______ GOAL 5 – A SUSTAINABLE, CAPABLE AND CONTEMPORARY ORGANISATION Tasmania Parks and Wildlife Service acknowledges and pays respect to Tasmanian Aboriginal people as the traditional and original owners, and continuing custodians of this land and acknowledges Elders – past, present and emerging. Image: Star light, Ben Lomond National Park. Message from the PREMIER OF TASMANIA, Minister for Parks National parks are very important to the people of lutruita / Tasmania and to their way of life. They are important places for me and my family. We treasure our time in the outdoors and there is nowhere more beautiful in the world. I recognise the intrinsic values of our parks and reserves. That is why I deliberately chose to lead the Parks portfolio, to elevate the work of the Parks and Wildlife Service and our unique and extraordinary landscapes in the minds of both my Cabinet and the community. -
Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Management Plan 2002
Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Management Plan 2002 (Altering the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Management Plan 1999 in the Cockle Creek East Area) Parks and Wildlife Service Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Management Plan 2002 (Altering the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Management Plan 1999 in the Cockle Creek East Area) This management plan for the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Part IV of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1970. Unless otherwise specified, this plan adopts the interpretation of terms given in Section 3 of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1970. The term ‘Minister’ when used in the plan means the Minister administering the Act. The term ‘PWS’ refers to the Parks and Wildlife Service. The draft of this plan [Draft Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Management Plan 2000 (Altering the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Management Plan 1999 in the Cockle Creek East Area)] was available for public comment from 18 November 2000 until 18 December 2000. As required by Section 20 of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1970, the Director PWS has reported to the Resource Planning and Development Commission on this public comment. This plan is a modified version of the draft, having been varied to take account of public input during that period, advice from the Resource Planning and Development Commission, the views of the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Consultative Committee and the National Parks and Wildlife Advisory Council. Its approval was recommended on 21 December 2001 by the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Ministerial Council under the joint management arrangement between the Tasmanian and Commonwealth Governments. -
Draft Melaleuca – Cox Bight Management Statement 2013
Draft Melaleuca – Cox Bight Management Statement 2013 Draft Melaleuca – Cox Bight Management Statement 2013 Draft Melaleuca – Cox Bight Management Statement 2013 Draft Melaleuca – Cox Bight Management Statement 2013 Southwest National Park Draft Melaleuca – Cox Bight Management Statement 2013 DRAFT Melaleuca – Cox Bight Management Statement 2013 (part of Southwest National Park) This management statement applies to part of the Southwest National Park between Melaleuca and Cox Bight which is managed under the National Parks and Reserves Management Act 2002. Many people have assisted in the preparation of this plan with ideas, feedback and information. Their time and effort is gratefully acknowledged. Comments on this draft plan are invited and will be used to prepare the final plan. Peter Mooney General Manager Tasmania Parks and Wildlife Service ISBN 978-0-9875827-9-9 (print version) ISBN 978-0-9875827-8-2 (pdf version) © State of Tasmania 2013 Cover photo: Cox Bight by A.Turbett Published by: Parks and Wildlife Service Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment GPO Box 1751 Hobart TASMANIA 7001 Draft Melaleuca – Cox Bight Management Statement 2013 Contents Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Location and tenure ..................................................................................... 2 1.2 -
HIKING HIGHLIGHTS of TASMANIA (Cont)
FACTSHEET DURATION: 15 days HIKING HIGHLIGHTS TOUR GRADE: T1 T2 T3 T4 OF TASMANIA T1: Well defined and wide tracks on easy to moderate terrain, in slightly modified 15 DAYS OF ACCOMMODATED DAYWALKS IN THE TASMANIAN WILDERNESS natural environments. You will require a modest level of fitness. Recommended for beginners. A 15-day walking tour visiting many of Tasmania’s T2: Narrower but distinct tracks which can be muddy in some places, in pristine wilderness national parks and reserves and natural environments. Facilities are minimal and you will encounter few featuring a variety of walking landscapes (alpine, other walkers. You will require a reasonable level of fitness. sub-alpine or coastal) grades (challenging T3: Marked but often rough and indistinct tracks, often on irregular ground, muddy or moderate) and gradients (steep or level/ and wet, in very remote and wild areas. These are challenging walks needing undulating). Several destinations offer a a high level of fitness and some hiking experience. variety of walks to suit a range of fitness levels and routes can be varied to suit. As a contrast, the tour also includes an unforgettable mid-tour cruise on Macquarie Harbour to vary the style and pace of the walking activities. The tour is fully catered and accommodation is provided in twin-share facilities. TASMANIA Tasmania’s ancient and varied landscape is worlds apart from the continent it belongs to. Forests of ancient conifers and fagus from the Jurassic Age, along with dramatic dolerite cliffs and mountains, are some of the features that make Tasmania’s scenery so special. -
Volume 1 Formal Papers Presented
SECOND SOUTH PACIFIC CONFERENCE ON NATIONAL PARKS AND RESERVES Proceedings - Volume 1 Formal Papers Presented ,_ ., \ •. / •. • •t ~~3. "fR • oqlJ Sou 'lo\ . .I SYDNEY AUSTRALIA 1979 Lb) SECOi iD SOUTH PACIFIC CONFERENCE ON NATIONAL PARKS AND RESERVES - SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA, 1979 FORMAL PAPERS PRESENTED VOLUME I Page No. CONTENTS I AGENDA 4 II PAPERS PRESENTED ( 1) MAN IN THE SOUTH PACIFIC - PAST AND PRESENT by Senator The Hon. J.J. Webster, Minister for Science and the Environment, Australia 118 ( 2) PARKS, RESERVES AND TRADITIONAL COMMUNITIES by The Hon. P. Kakarya, Minister for Environment and Conservation, Papua New Guinea 123 ( 3) THE IMPORTANCE OF ISLANDS AS RESERVES by The Hon. V. Young, Minister for Lands, New Zealand 130 ( 4) THE COASTAL ECOSYSTEM - MAN' S IMP ACT by The Hon. I. Bajpai, Minister for Social Welfare, Fiji 140 (5) DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF MARINE PARKS AND RESERVES IN THE KINGDOM OF TONGA by Mr. S.L. Tongilava, Superintendent of Lands, Surveys and Natural Resources, Tonga 148 ( 6) THE PROBLEMS OF CREATING PUBLIC AWARENESS (Panel Session) - Convenor, Dr. A. Dahl, Regional Ecological Adviser, South Pacific 89 Commission (Volume II) ( r!) MAN IN THE SOUTH PACIFIC - THE FUTURE by Dr. R.F. Dasmann , Re presenting the International Union for the Conservation of 103 Natur e and Natural Resources (Volume II) ') '· III SITUATION REPORTS Page No. (1) Australia 6 (2) Australian Capital Territory 12 (3) Cook Islands 16 18 ( 4) Fiji (5) French Polynesia 32 (6) Gilbert Islands 35 (?) Nauru 80 (8) New Caledonia 37 (9) New Hebrides (Vanuaaku) 41 (10) New South Wales 21 (11) New Zealand 51 (12) Northern Territory 43 (13) Papua New Guinea 69 (14) Queensland 76 (15) South Australia 82 {16) Tasmania 56 ( 17) Tonga 89 108 (18) United States of America ( 19) Victoria 94 (20) Western Australia 105 101 (21) Wes tern Samoa IV RECJHHENDA'I'IONS : Page No. -
Part-3---A-Review-Of-The-Geoconservation-Values-Of-The-Tasmanian-WWHA.Pdf
Recommendations and Issues Arising 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS & ISSUES ARISING 4.1 Introduction This final section briefly draws out conclusions arising from the descriptions and discussions of the World Heritage geoconservation values of the TWWHA that have been provided in Section (3.0). In most cases, issues are only briefly highlighted or dot-pointed in this section, so as to provide a simple "check list" of key issues arising. Section (3.0) (and references therein) should be referred to for background details of the various issues and recommendations listed here. 4.2 Recommended Additions to the TWWHA Based on Geoconservation Values, and Areas for Further Consideration All of the 21 new reserves adjoining the TWWHA, as listed and described in Section (3.3) above, contain features or systems contributing substantially to one of more of the recognised TWWHA World Heritage geodiversity themes (see Section 3.3), and hence they are all recommended for inclusion in an extended Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area (TWWHA) boundary on this basis. It is additionally recommended that the Hastings Caves State Reserve – which immediately adjoins the Hastings Cave reserve extension that is one of the 21 new reserves recommended for inclusion in the TWWHA - be also incorporated within the TWWHA boundary owing to its possession of dolomite karst systems that are physically continuous with, as well-developed, and more accessible than those contributing to the Karst World Heritage geoconservation themes within the existing (and now contiguous) Southwest National Park / TWWHA (see Section 3.4). Significantly, this proposal would also add an important ongoing hydrothermal karst system to the TWWHA (see Section 3.4), which is a karst process that is at present poorly represented within the TWWHA, yet is an important element of Tasmania's karst geodiversity.