DOCSLIB.ORG

Melaleuca Site and Rehabilitation Plan 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Melaleuca Site and Rehabilitation Plan 2014 Melaleuca Site and Rehabilitation Plan Southwest National Park Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Melaleuca Site and Rehabilitation Plan This site and rehabilitation plan applies to Melaleuca which lies in the Southwest National Park and the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. It applies to the Melaleuca Visitor Services Zone as well as the former Rallinga mining lease area and nearby sites used for recreational, conservation or operational purposes. The plan has been prepared, as agreed with the Commonwealth Government, to facilitate mining rehabilitation works; to improve visitors’ experiences in the Melaleuca area; and, to guide site management. Peter Mooney General Manager Tasmania Parks and Wildlife Service ISBN 978-0-9923628-1-2 (print version) ISBN 978-0-9923628-2-9 (pdf version) © State of Tasmania 2014 Cover photo: Moth Creek by A.Turbett Published by: Parks and Wildlife Service Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment GPO Box 1751 Hobart TASMANIA 7001 Melaleuca Site and Rehabilitation Plan Contents Visitor Experience Statement ................................................................................................ 1 Summary ................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction and reserve management framework ...................................................... 4 1.1 Significance of Melaleuca .................................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Background information .................................................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Plan purpose and boundary ............................................................................................................................ 6 1.4 Relationship to other plans ............................................................................................................................. 9 1.5 Management challenges .................................................................................................................................. 10 1.6 Overarching objectives .................................................................................................................................. 10 2. Values of Melaleuca ........................................................................................................ 12 2.1 World heritage values .................................................................................................................................... 12 2.2 Landscape values .............................................................................................................................................. 13 2.3 Geoheritage values .......................................................................................................................................... 14 2.4 Flora and fauna values..................................................................................................................................... 15 2.5 Aboriginal heritage values.............................................................................................................................. 16 2.6 Historic heritage values ................................................................................................................................. 17 3. Reserve protection ......................................................................................................... 20 3.1 Diseases, introduced species and biosecurity .......................................................................................... 20 3.2 Research and conservation programs ........................................................................................................ 22 4. Visitors and facilities ....................................................................................................... 25 4.1 Management zones .......................................................................................................................................... 26 4.2 Access – aircraft, boating and walking ....................................................................................................... 29 4.3 Day and overnight facilities ........................................................................................................................... 35 4.4 Information and interpretation .................................................................................................................... 37 4.5 Visitor monitoring ........................................................................................................................................... 40 4.6 New developments ......................................................................................................................................... 41 4.7 Commercial visitor services ......................................................................................................................... 41 4.8 Operational facilities ....................................................................................................................................... 42 4.9 Residential leases ............................................................................................................................................. 45 4.10 Community and volunteers .......................................................................................................................... 45 5. Rehabilitation of Rallinga Mine area ............................................................................. 47 5.1 Background information ................................................................................................................................ 47 5.2 Rehabilitation considerations ....................................................................................................................... 49 5.3 Rehabilitation activities ................................................................................................................................... 49 6. Monitoring and evaluation ............................................................................................. 53 Melaleuca Site and Rehabilitation Plan 7. Information sources ........................................................................................................ 55 8. Appendices ...................................................................................................................... 58 Appendix 1 – Key desired outcomes, indicators and effectiveness monitoring ................................................ 58 Appendix 2 – Implementation plan ................................................................................................................................ 60 Maps Map 1 Location and tenure.....................................................................................................................................7 Map 2 Plan area and features..................................................................................................................................8 Map 3 Zoning............................................................................................................................................................28 Map 4 Rallinga Mine key features and rehabilitation activities......................................................................48 Abbreviations and terminology chytrid amphibian chytrid fungus DPIPWE Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment ha hectares ICOMOS International Council on Monuments and Sites IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature OUV Outstanding Universal Value means cultural and/or natural significance which is so exceptional as to transcend national boundaries and to be of common importance for present and future generations of all humanity. (Definition from the ‘Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention’). PWS Parks and Wildlife Service RSF The Reserve Standards Framework is a PWS policy approach for risk management and sets standards for acceptable levels of visitor risk. It also facilitates the targeted provision of services that are appropriate for specific areas. TWWHA Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation VSZ Visitor Services Zone Melaleuca Site and Rehabilitation Plan Visitor Experience Statement Lying deep within the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area, Melaleuca is a special and spectacular place to visit. The following statement captures the intended experiences for visitors which this plan aims to facilitate. Although it is one of the most remote areas of mainland Tasmania, and beyond the road network, Melaleuca receives many visitors arriving by air, sea or on foot. It attracts a wide range of people due to its beauty, isolation, and both natural and human history. Melaleuca provides a gateway for some visitors to explore the more remote parts of Tasmania’s rugged south-west wilderness. Others appreciate the opportunity to experience the area from air, land and water on a day tour from Hobart. For boaters the area can provide a haven from the wild waters off Tasmania’s south-west coast. Melaleuca can also be experienced through relaxing day trips, combined with a scenic flight. The facilities and aircraft
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Epacris Study Group
    AUSTRALIAN NATIVE PLANTS SOCIETY (Australia) Jnc. EPACRIS STUDY GROUP Group Leader: Gwen Elliot, P.O.Box 655 Heathmont Vic. 3135 NEWSLETTER NO. 30 (ISSN 1038-6017) Greetings to all Epacris Study Group members, Regular readers of our Newsletters will have noticed the following note which was added to page 1 of our Autumn 2010 issue, just prior to it going to press. NOTE: I have just received in the post an envelope addressed to the Epacris Study Group, posted from Hobart on May Znd, 2010. Unfortunately the envelope was slit along the bottom and was totally empty. There was no information regarding the sender, but ifyou have sent such a letter in recent days, please let me know, and perhaps cancel any cheque sent. Fortunately all turned out well in the end, as the next morning an Epacris Study Group renewal form was delivered with a $5 note stapled to the corner. Our very nice Post Office manager advised that it had been found on the floor of the district sorting office. He went on to explain that many of today's envelopes have a very effective self-sealing strip and if there is any air left in the envelope when the seal is fastened envelopes can 'pop' at the bottom as they go through the rollers of the sorting machines. This is certainly something I had not personally considered previously, but I felt it is very useful information for us all to be aware of. All of my letters will be squashed down firmly in future to avoid this potential problem.
    [Show full text]
  • 20 TASMANIA 40ºsouth Great Southern Land
    20 TASMANIA 40ºSouth Great southern land writer Lucinda Sharp photographer Chris Crerar I stood on a rock high on a hill and looked down at a panorama of sea, grassland and forest. I was in the Port Davey Marine Reserve, deep in the Southwest National Park. Looking back at me, I thought, was the soul of Tasmania. I had flown in by light plane the previous day. You come here by plane or by boat. This is a soul protected by the law of man and the lie of land. There is no other way in. This is part of land which a panel of objective but hard- nosed environmentalists at UNESCO headquarters in Paris decided deserved the appellation of World Heritage Wilderness Area. This a title not awarded to places where there are more people than peace, where there is more noise than nature, where there is more concrete than bird calls. To earn the title, the environmentocrats in Paris must judge whether the candidate has, amongst other criteria, “natural features consisting of physical and biological formations or groups of such formations, which are of outstanding universal value from the aesthetic or scientific point of view”, and “geological and physiographical formations and precisely delineated areas which constitute the habitat of threatened species of animals and plants of outstanding universal value from the point of view of science or conservation”. They wouldn’t have had to think too hard about it. This is the home of extraordinary beauty. It is the home of the TASMANIA 40ºSouth 21 much-loved and desperately threatened orange- bellied parrot.
    [Show full text]
  • Budawangia* an E-Newsletter for All Those Interested in the Native Plants of the Nsw South Coast
    BUDAWANGIA* AN E-NEWSLETTER FOR ALL THOSE INTERESTED IN THE NATIVE PLANTS OF THE NSW SOUTH COAST Contact: Dr Kevin Mills – [email protected] No. 48 - March 2016 Aims: To connect those interested in the native flora of the NSW South Coast, to share up to date information on the flora of the region and to broaden the appreciation of the region’s native plants. Editorial With continuing warmer oceans around Australia, El Nino has deepened during the last two months, and our dry conditions continued into mid-March when some reasonable rain finally came. We can only be thankful that the severe bushfires this season in other states have not occurred in our part of the world. Blackberry bushes were introduced for their fruit but now are regarded as noxious weeds. Many of us would remember going out in summer and collecting the fruit from thickets of Blackberry in paddocks and escarpment clearings. Native raspberries are closely related to the Blackberry, and there are four species in the region, although their fruits are not as an attractive culinary treat as the introduction. The native raspberries are the subject of the first piece in this newsletter, followed by items on a plant of the month, an eatable thistle, slime mould and a new weed for the region. The answers to last month’s challenge to identify rainforest tree bark are also provided as is a photo of a common local frog from a reader. Below is another note on a common Australian genus. Grevillea - named in 1809 after the English politician and founder of the London Horticultural Society Charles Francis Greville.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests?
    Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? An Analysis of the State of the Nation’s Regional Forest Agreements Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? An Analysis of the State of the Nation’s Regional Forest Agreements The Wilderness Society. 2020, Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? The State of the Nation’s RFAs, The Wilderness Society, Melbourne, Australia Table of contents 4 Executive summary Printed on 100% recycled post-consumer waste paper 5 Key findings 6 Recommendations Copyright The Wilderness Society Ltd 7 List of abbreviations All material presented in this publication is protected by copyright. 8 Introduction First published September 2020. 9 1. Background and legal status 12 2. Success of the RFAs in achieving key outcomes Contact: [email protected] | 1800 030 641 | www.wilderness.org.au 12 2.1 Comprehensive, Adequate, Representative Reserve system 13 2.1.1 Design of the CAR Reserve System Cover image: Yarra Ranges, Victoria | mitchgreenphotos.com 14 2.1.2 Implementation of the CAR Reserve System 15 2.1.3 Management of the CAR Reserve System 16 2.2 Ecologically Sustainable Forest Management 16 2.2.1 Maintaining biodiversity 20 2.2.2 Contributing factors to biodiversity decline 21 2.3 Security for industry 22 2.3.1 Volume of logs harvested 25 2.3.2 Employment 25 2.3.3 Growth in the plantation sector of Australia’s wood products industry 27 2.3.4 Factors contributing to industry decline 28 2.4 Regard to relevant research and projects 28 2.5 Reviews 32 3. Ability of the RFAs to meet intended outcomes into the future 32 3.1 Climate change 32 3.1.1 The role of forests in climate change mitigation 32 3.1.2 Climate change impacts on conservation and native forestry 33 3.2 Biodiversity loss/resource decline 33 3.2.1 Altered fire regimes 34 3.2.2 Disease 35 3.2.3 Pest species 35 3.3 Competing forest uses and values 35 3.3.1 Water 35 3.3.2 Carbon credits 36 3.4 Changing industries, markets and societies 36 3.5 International and national agreements 37 3.6 Legal concerns 37 3.7 Findings 38 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollination Ecology and Evolution of Epacrids
    Pollination Ecology and Evolution of Epacrids by Karen A. Johnson BSc (Hons) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania February 2012 ii Declaration of originality This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. Karen A. Johnson Statement of authority of access This thesis may be made available for copying. Copying of any part of this thesis is prohibited for two years from the date this statement was signed; after that time limited copying is permitted in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Karen A. Johnson iii iv Abstract Relationships between plants and their pollinators are thought to have played a major role in the morphological diversification of angiosperms. The epacrids (subfamily Styphelioideae) comprise more than 550 species of woody plants ranging from small prostrate shrubs to temperate rainforest emergents. Their range extends from SE Asia through Oceania to Tierra del Fuego with their highest diversity in Australia. The overall aim of the thesis is to determine the relationships between epacrid floral features and potential pollinators, and assess the evolutionary status of any pollination syndromes. The main hypotheses were that flower characteristics relate to pollinators in predictable ways; and that there is convergent evolution in the development of pollination syndromes.
    [Show full text]
  • Epacris Study Group
    ASSOCIATION OF SOCIETIES FOR GROWING AUSTRALIAN PLANTS Inc. EPACRIS STUDY GROUP Group Leader: Gwen Elliot, P.O. Box 655 Heathmont Vic. 3135 NEWSLETTER No. XS (ISSN 103 8-6017) Qctaber zaQ4 Greetings as once again we begin to enjoy the longer days of spring-summer and the encouragement this provides for many of our flowering plants. Despite the generally dry conditions many Epacris species are putting on outstanding floral displays. How are you going with your recording of the flowering times of Epacris impressa in your garden, as well as in nearby bushland or in other areas as you travel within Australia? It really is quite an exciting project because together we, as Study Group members, can make a real contribution to the overall understanding of this species, adding to the knowledge and research of botanists who look in detail at the features of the plant under the microscope and in its natural habitat. It iis a species which occurs both atsea-level and at higher altitudes. How are the flowering times affected when highland plants are cultivated at lower altitudes? Are flowering times different when plants fiom New South Wales for example are gvown much further south in soulhern Victoria or Tasmania ? Epacris impressu seems like an excellent species for us to research in this way. If our project is successful we may perhaps be able to continue with looking at the flowering times of other Epacris which are relatively common in cultivation. In case you have misplaced the recording sheet from our October 2003 Newsletter, another is included in this issue.
    [Show full text]
  • OH805 GOLDSWORTHY, Reuben
    STATE LIBRARY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA J. D. SOMERVILLE ORAL HISTORY COLLECTION OH 593/5 Full transcript of an interview with CHRISTOBEL MATTINGLEY on 17 July, 24 July, & 21 August 2001 By Karen George Recording available on CD Access for research: Unrestricted Right to photocopy: Copies may be made for research and study Right to quote or publish: Publication only with written permission from the State Library OH 593/5 CHRISTOBEL MATTINGLEY NOTES TO THE TRANSCRIPT This transcript was created by the J. D. Somerville Oral History Collection of the State Library. It conforms to the Somerville Collection's policies for transcription which are explained below. Readers of this oral history transcript should bear in mind that it is a record of the spoken word and reflects the informal, conversational style that is inherent in such historical sources. The State Library is not responsible for the factual accuracy of the interview, nor for the views expressed therein. As with any historical source, these are for the reader to judge. It is the Somerville Collection's policy to produce a transcript that is, so far as possible, a verbatim transcript that preserves the interviewee's manner of speaking and the conversational style of the interview. Certain conventions of transcription have been applied (ie. the omission of meaningless noises, false starts and a percentage of the interviewee's crutch words). Where the interviewee has had the opportunity to read the transcript, their suggested alterations have been incorporated in the text (see below). On the whole, the document can be regarded as a raw transcript.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Report
    Gordonvale World Heritage Area Reserve Background Report www.tasland.org.au Tasmanian Land Conservancy (2015). Gordonvale World Heritage Area Reserve Background Report. Tasmanian Land Conservancy, Tasmania Australia 7005. Copyright ©Tasmanian Land Conservancy The views expressed in this report are those of the Tasmanian Land Conservancy and not the Commonwealth Government, State Government or any other entity. This work is copyright. It may be reproduced for study, research or training purposes subject to an acknowledgment of the sources and no commercial usage or sale. Requests and enquires concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Tasmanian Land Conservancy. Front Image: Gordonvale homestead (archive photo) and the Vale of Rasselas landscape © Grant Dixon Contact Address Tasmanian Land Conservancy PO Box 2112, Lower Sandy Bay, 827 Sandy Bay Road, Sandy Bay Tasmania, AUSTRALIA 7005 | p: 03 6225 1399 | www.tasland.org.au | Contents Page Acknowledgments 2 Acronyms and Abbreviations 3 INTRODUCTION 4 Gordonvale Fundraising Campaign 4 Location and Access 5 BIOREGIONAL AND LANDSCAPE CONTEXT 7 WORLD HERITAGE AREA STATUS 7 IUCN Protected Area Management Category 7 Legal Status and Compliance 8 NATURAL VALUES 9 GEO-CONSERVATION VALUES 12 WILDERNESS VALUES 12 INDIGENOUS VALUES 12 EUROPEAN HERITAGE 13 INVASIVE PESTS, WEEDS AND DISEASES 13 SCIENTIFIC STUDIES 13 MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 14 REFERENCES 15 APPENDIX A – Gordonvale ‘For Sale’ 16 APPENDIX B - Bushwalking tracks into Gordonvale 18 APPENDIX C - History of Ernie Bond at Gordonvale 21 1 Acknowledgements The Gordonvale World Heritage Area Reserve was secured by the Tasmanian Land Conservancy (TLC) in 2013 after a successful public fundraising campaign to purchase this private freehold block of land.
    [Show full text]
  • Iconic Lands: Wilderness As a Reservation Criterion for World Heritage
    ICONIC LANDS Wilderness as a reservation criterion for World Heritage Mario Gabriele Roberto Rimini A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Institute of Environmental Studies University of New South Wales April 2010 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My gratitude goes to the Director of the Institute of Environmental Studies, John Merson, for the knowledge and passion he shared with me and for his trust, and to the precious advice and constant support of my co-supervisor, Stephen Fortescue. My family, their help and faith, have made this achievement possible. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I Introduction ………………………………………………………………………….…...…… 8 Scope and Rationale.………………………………………………………………………….…...…………. 8 Background…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 12 Methodology…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 22 Structure…………………………………………………………………………………………………….... 23 CHAPTER II The Wilderness Idea ……………………………………………………………………........ 27 Early conceptions …………………………………………………………………………………………..... 27 American Wilderness: a world model …………………………………………………….....………………. 33 The Wilderness Act: from ideal to conservation paradigm …………………………………........…………. 43 The values of wilderness ……………………………………………………………………….…………… 48 Summary ………………………………………………………………………………………….…………. 58 CHAPTER III Wilderness as a conservation and land management category worldwide …………......... 61 The US model: wilderness legislation in Canada, New Zealand and Australia …………………………… 61 Canada: a wilderness giant ………………………………………………………………………..…...........
    [Show full text]
  • Timber Deliveries to Hobart Town—1876, Laurie Moody
    TASMANIAN FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY INC. Volume 34 Number 2—September 2013 TASMANIAN FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY INC. PO Box 326 Rosny Park Tasmania 7018 Society Secretary: [email protected] Journal Editor: [email protected] Home Page: http://www.tasfhs.org Patron: Dr Alison Alexander Fellows: Dr Neil Chick and Mr David Harris Executive: President Maurice Appleyard (03) 6248 4229 Vice President Robert Tanner (03) 6231 0794 Vice President Pam Bartlett (03) 6428 7003 Society Secretary Colleen Read (03) 6244 4527 Society Treasurer Peter Cocker (03) 6435 4103 Committee: Helen Anderson Betty Bissett Vanessa Blair Judith Cocker Geoffrey Dean Lucille Gee John Gillham Libby Gillham Julie Kapeller Dale Smith By-laws Coordinator Robert Tanner (03) 6231 0794 Webmaster Robert Tanner (03) 6231 0794 Journal Editor Rosemary Davidson (03) 6424 1343 LWFHA Coordinator Lucille Gee (03) 6344 7650 Members’ Interests Compiler John Gillham (03) 6239 6529 Membership Registrar Muriel Bissett (03) 6344 4034 Publications Convenor Bev Richardson (03) 6225 3292 Public Officer Colleen Read (03) 6244 4527 Society Sales Officer Maurice Appleyard (03) 6245 9351 Branches of the Society Burnie:PO Box 748 Burnie Tasmania 7320 [email protected] Mersey:PO Box 267 Latrobe Tasmania 7307 [email protected] Hobart:PO Box 326 Rosny Park Tasmania 7018 [email protected] Huon:PO Box 117 Huonville Tasmania 7109 [email protected] Launceston:PO Box 1290 Launceston Tasmania 7250 [email protected] Volume 34 Number 2 September 2013 ISSN 0159 0677 Contents From the editor
    [Show full text]
  • IUCN S07: TASMANIAN WILDERNESS (Revision to Existing
    WORLD HERITAGE NOMINATION - IUCN S07: TASMANIAN WILDERNESS (Revision to existing Property inscribed in 1982) Summary prepared by IUCN (April 1989) based on the original nomination submitted by the Government of Australia. This original and all documents presented in support of this nomination will be available for consultation at the meeting of the Bureau and the Committee. Note: In the light of the Bureau's concurrence with proposals to further extend the nominated site, the State Party's nomination of 1,374,000 ha in total, further revised in September 1989, is discussed in the IUCN Technical Evaluation. 1. LOCATION Comprises a contiguous network of reserved lands that extends over much of south-western Tasmania. including five national parks (Cradle Mountain-Lake St Clair, Franklin-Lower Gordon Wild Rivers, Southwest, Walls of Jerusalem and Hartz Mountains), four state reserves (Devils Gullet, Marakoopa Cave, Exit Cave and Port Davey) and part of Liffey Falls State Reserve, four conservation areas (Central Plateau, Oakleigh Creek, Southwest and St. Clair Lagoon), and"a number of protected areas, forest reserves as well as land verted in the Hydro-Electric Commission. Several outliers are included in the nominated area: Sarah Island Historic Site .in Macquarie Harbour; and lIe du Golfe, De Witt Island, Flat Witch Island and Maatsukyer Island off the south coast of Tasmania. Lake Gordon and some land adjoining it in the centre of this network has been developed for hydro-electric purposes and is excluded. 41°3S'-43°40'S, l4S02S'-l46°55'E. 2. JURIDICAL DATA Apart from approximately 330ha of privately-owned land in the Vale of Rasselas, on the Central Plateau and at Pillinger, land is publicly owned and includes 773,215ha under national parks, 2074h under state reserves, c.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 20 16 Highlights for 2015-16
    ANNUAL REPORT 2016 HIGHLIGHTS FOR 2015-16 • awarded $3.9 million to 135 projects in two general grant rounds • commenced a community infrastructure targeted round • delivered community forums at Bothwell, George Town, Launceston, Mornington and New Norfolk, receiving vital feedback on issues concerning communities and the Fund • initiated an emerging community leaders program. The Hon Sarah Courtney MP Parliamentary Secretary to the Premier (Community and Veterans Affairs) Parliament House HOBART TAS 7000 Dear Parliamentary Secretary I am pleased to provide the annual report of the Tasmanian Community Fund for the year ending 30 June 2016 for presentation to Parliament. This report is submitted in accordance with Section 11 of the Tasmanian Community Fund Act 2005, and marks the conclusion of the 16th year of operation of the Fund. To reflect the diversity of grants awarded by the Board the annual report focuses on the diversity of projects, locations and organisations that the Tasmanian Community Fund has supported. The Board, staff and I look forward to continuing to support many organisations making a difference in the community. Yours sincerely Lynn Mason CHAIRWOMAN 4 October 2016 CONTENTS Chairwoman’s Message 2 Senior Executive Officer’s Report 4 Grant Rounds 7 About Us 24 Applying for a Grant 32 Financial Statements 35 CHAIRWOMAN’S MESSAGE is my privilege to present this message on behalf The Board consulted a number of different groups, It of the Board of the Tasmanian Community Fund. including local government, to determine the focus of With this report the Fund informs Parliament on its a targeted round in the first six months of 2016.
    [Show full text]