Draft Melaleuca – Cox Bight Management Statement 2013

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Draft Melaleuca – Cox Bight Management Statement 2013 Draft Melaleuca – Cox Bight Management Statement 2013 Draft Melaleuca – Cox Bight Management Statement 2013 Draft Melaleuca – Cox Bight Management Statement 2013 Draft Melaleuca – Cox Bight Management Statement 2013 Southwest National Park Draft Melaleuca – Cox Bight Management Statement 2013 DRAFT Melaleuca – Cox Bight Management Statement 2013 (part of Southwest National Park) This management statement applies to part of the Southwest National Park between Melaleuca and Cox Bight which is managed under the National Parks and Reserves Management Act 2002. Many people have assisted in the preparation of this plan with ideas, feedback and information. Their time and effort is gratefully acknowledged. Comments on this draft plan are invited and will be used to prepare the final plan. Peter Mooney General Manager Tasmania Parks and Wildlife Service ISBN 978-0-9875827-9-9 (print version) ISBN 978-0-9875827-8-2 (pdf version) © State of Tasmania 2013 Cover photo: Cox Bight by A.Turbett Published by: Parks and Wildlife Service Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment GPO Box 1751 Hobart TASMANIA 7001 Draft Melaleuca – Cox Bight Management Statement 2013 Contents Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Location and tenure ..................................................................................... 2 1.2 Plan purpose and boundary ......................................................................... 2 1.3 Relationship to other plans ........................................................................... 3 1.4 Reservation and management history .......................................................... 5 1.5 Management challenges and opportunities .................................................. 5 2. Reserve management framework ...................................................................... 7 2.1 Reserve significance .................................................................................... 7 2.2 Vision ........................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Legislation and management objectives ....................................................... 9 3. Conservation of reserve values ....................................................................... 11 3.1 Landscape and wilderness values .............................................................. 11 3.2 Geoheritage values .................................................................................... 13 3.3 Water values .............................................................................................. 15 3.4 Flora and fauna values ............................................................................... 16 3.5 Aboriginal heritage values .......................................................................... 20 3.6 Historic heritage values .............................................................................. 21 4. Reserve protection ........................................................................................... 25 4.1 Climate change .......................................................................................... 25 4.2 Fire management ....................................................................................... 27 4.3 Introduced species ..................................................................................... 29 4.4 Biosecurity and diseases ........................................................................... 31 4.5 Acid sulphate soils ..................................................................................... 34 5. Visitor facilities and activities .......................................................................... 37 5.1 Visitor Experience Statement ..................................................................... 37 5.2 Management zones.................................................................................... 38 5.3 Facilities and access for visitors ................................................................. 41 6. Monitoring and evaluation ............................................................................... 45 7. Information sources ......................................................................................... 47 8. Appendices ....................................................................................................... 51 Appendix 1 – Key desired outcomes, indicators and effectiveness monitoring ... 51 Appendix 2 – Implementation Plan ..................................................................... 53 Draft Melaleuca – Cox Bight Management Statement 2013 Maps Map 1 Location and plan area………………....................................................4 Map 2 Zoning.................................................................................................40 Abbreviations and terminology ASS acid sulfate soils CFEV Conservation of Freshwater Ecosystem Values ha hectares FSOA Fuel Stove Only Area (an area where campfires are not permitted and only fuel stoves can be used) Landing Area Bathurst Harbour Landing Area NES National Environmental Significance PWS Tasmania Parks and Wildlife Service THPI Tasmanian Heritage Places Inventory TWWHA Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area VSZ Visitor Services Zone Draft Melaleuca – Cox Bight Management Statement 2013 Summary The reserved land covered by this plan is part of the Southwest National Park in remote south-west Tasmania. The plan area covers a 3,823 ha section of the national park between Melaleuca and Cox Bight (see Map 1). The plan area was first reserved in April 1966 as part of Southwest Conservation Area. Although the surrounding area became Southwest National Park in 1990, the plan area continued to be a section of the Southwest Conservation Area to allow for the Cox Bight – Melaleuca tin field to remain open for mining and exploration. After mining formally ceased, the area was included in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area (TWWHA) in June 2012. It became part of the Southwest National Park in December 2012. The addition of the plan area to the Southwest National Park allows for equal reservation status and management continuity for the south-west. The plan area is part of a world heritage national park where diverse values need to be managed alongside various human uses. The critically endangered orange- bellied parrot (Neophema chrysogaster) is the most high profile value and conservation issue. The plan area is considered to be the focus of orange-bellied parrot breeding and foraging habitat and is therefore the focus of conservation activities for the parrot. Other important values include the Aboriginal heritage of the Needwonnee people; prominent geoheritage features such as the peat mounds; and the more recent historic heritage associated with alluvial tin mining. The plan area also needs to be managed to protect its characteristic remote south- west setting – a key value that is a great attraction for visitors. Development within the plan area requires particular care to ensure that visitors can be provided for, while protecting significant values. The main threats to the plan area are biosecurity risks and potential impacts from uncontrolled bushfire. The former include infestations of Phytophthora cinnamomi (‘Phytophthora’); amphibian chytrid fungus; and, the potential introduction of weeds and pests. A number of strategies are proposed to mitigate these threats including the development and implementation of a biosecurity plan; the provision of washdown stations and education around their use; increased awareness of existing Phytophthora infestations; and, avoidance of further ground disturbance. The unique features of the area, and the relatively low level of human interference, also provide researchers with an opportunity to observe, measure and document responses to sea-level rise and climate change. Now that it is part of the TWWHA, the Melaleuca-Cox Bight area will be covered by the new statutory TWWHA management plan, once that new plan has been approved. Where any provisions of this management statement and the new TWWHA management plan are in conflict, the statutory TWWHA management plan will take precedence. 1 Draft Melaleuca – Cox Bight Management Statement 2013 1. Introduction 1.1 Location and tenure Plan area: 3,823 ha Location: Southwest National Park Plan reference: LM148 Map details: Cox, 4218 Centroid (GDA): 437300, 5186400 IUCN category: National Park (IUCN category I) First reserved: 13 April 1966 (as Southwest Conservation Area) Current Status: 26 December 2012 (Southwest National Park) This management statement covers a 3,823 ha section of Southwest National Park between Melaleuca and Cox Bight (“the plan area”). The Southwest National Park covers the majority of south-west Tasmania and is the largest national park in Tasmania (approximately 622,864 hectares). The plan area is mostly accessed by light plane (using an airstrip at Melaleuca), by boat through Melaleuca Inlet from Bathurst Harbour, or by walking from Cockle Creek on the South Coast Track or Lake Pedder/Scotts Peak Dam on the Port Davey Track. 1.2 Plan purpose and boundary This document is a non-statutory management statement that provides management guidance for the area between Melaleuca and Cox Bight that was formerly part of
Recommended publications
  • 20 TASMANIA 40ºsouth Great Southern Land
    20 TASMANIA 40ºSouth Great southern land writer Lucinda Sharp photographer Chris Crerar I stood on a rock high on a hill and looked down at a panorama of sea, grassland and forest. I was in the Port Davey Marine Reserve, deep in the Southwest National Park. Looking back at me, I thought, was the soul of Tasmania. I had flown in by light plane the previous day. You come here by plane or by boat. This is a soul protected by the law of man and the lie of land. There is no other way in. This is part of land which a panel of objective but hard- nosed environmentalists at UNESCO headquarters in Paris decided deserved the appellation of World Heritage Wilderness Area. This a title not awarded to places where there are more people than peace, where there is more noise than nature, where there is more concrete than bird calls. To earn the title, the environmentocrats in Paris must judge whether the candidate has, amongst other criteria, “natural features consisting of physical and biological formations or groups of such formations, which are of outstanding universal value from the aesthetic or scientific point of view”, and “geological and physiographical formations and precisely delineated areas which constitute the habitat of threatened species of animals and plants of outstanding universal value from the point of view of science or conservation”. They wouldn’t have had to think too hard about it. This is the home of extraordinary beauty. It is the home of the TASMANIA 40ºSouth 21 much-loved and desperately threatened orange- bellied parrot.
    [Show full text]
  • OH805 GOLDSWORTHY, Reuben
    STATE LIBRARY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA J. D. SOMERVILLE ORAL HISTORY COLLECTION OH 593/5 Full transcript of an interview with CHRISTOBEL MATTINGLEY on 17 July, 24 July, & 21 August 2001 By Karen George Recording available on CD Access for research: Unrestricted Right to photocopy: Copies may be made for research and study Right to quote or publish: Publication only with written permission from the State Library OH 593/5 CHRISTOBEL MATTINGLEY NOTES TO THE TRANSCRIPT This transcript was created by the J. D. Somerville Oral History Collection of the State Library. It conforms to the Somerville Collection's policies for transcription which are explained below. Readers of this oral history transcript should bear in mind that it is a record of the spoken word and reflects the informal, conversational style that is inherent in such historical sources. The State Library is not responsible for the factual accuracy of the interview, nor for the views expressed therein. As with any historical source, these are for the reader to judge. It is the Somerville Collection's policy to produce a transcript that is, so far as possible, a verbatim transcript that preserves the interviewee's manner of speaking and the conversational style of the interview. Certain conventions of transcription have been applied (ie. the omission of meaningless noises, false starts and a percentage of the interviewee's crutch words). Where the interviewee has had the opportunity to read the transcript, their suggested alterations have been incorporated in the text (see below). On the whole, the document can be regarded as a raw transcript.
    [Show full text]
  • Timber Deliveries to Hobart Town—1876, Laurie Moody
    TASMANIAN FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY INC. Volume 34 Number 2—September 2013 TASMANIAN FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY INC. PO Box 326 Rosny Park Tasmania 7018 Society Secretary: [email protected] Journal Editor: [email protected] Home Page: http://www.tasfhs.org Patron: Dr Alison Alexander Fellows: Dr Neil Chick and Mr David Harris Executive: President Maurice Appleyard (03) 6248 4229 Vice President Robert Tanner (03) 6231 0794 Vice President Pam Bartlett (03) 6428 7003 Society Secretary Colleen Read (03) 6244 4527 Society Treasurer Peter Cocker (03) 6435 4103 Committee: Helen Anderson Betty Bissett Vanessa Blair Judith Cocker Geoffrey Dean Lucille Gee John Gillham Libby Gillham Julie Kapeller Dale Smith By-laws Coordinator Robert Tanner (03) 6231 0794 Webmaster Robert Tanner (03) 6231 0794 Journal Editor Rosemary Davidson (03) 6424 1343 LWFHA Coordinator Lucille Gee (03) 6344 7650 Members’ Interests Compiler John Gillham (03) 6239 6529 Membership Registrar Muriel Bissett (03) 6344 4034 Publications Convenor Bev Richardson (03) 6225 3292 Public Officer Colleen Read (03) 6244 4527 Society Sales Officer Maurice Appleyard (03) 6245 9351 Branches of the Society Burnie:PO Box 748 Burnie Tasmania 7320 [email protected] Mersey:PO Box 267 Latrobe Tasmania 7307 [email protected] Hobart:PO Box 326 Rosny Park Tasmania 7018 [email protected] Huon:PO Box 117 Huonville Tasmania 7109 [email protected] Launceston:PO Box 1290 Launceston Tasmania 7250 [email protected] Volume 34 Number 2 September 2013 ISSN 0159 0677 Contents From the editor
    [Show full text]
  • IUCN S07: TASMANIAN WILDERNESS (Revision to Existing
    WORLD HERITAGE NOMINATION - IUCN S07: TASMANIAN WILDERNESS (Revision to existing Property inscribed in 1982) Summary prepared by IUCN (April 1989) based on the original nomination submitted by the Government of Australia. This original and all documents presented in support of this nomination will be available for consultation at the meeting of the Bureau and the Committee. Note: In the light of the Bureau's concurrence with proposals to further extend the nominated site, the State Party's nomination of 1,374,000 ha in total, further revised in September 1989, is discussed in the IUCN Technical Evaluation. 1. LOCATION Comprises a contiguous network of reserved lands that extends over much of south-western Tasmania. including five national parks (Cradle Mountain-Lake St Clair, Franklin-Lower Gordon Wild Rivers, Southwest, Walls of Jerusalem and Hartz Mountains), four state reserves (Devils Gullet, Marakoopa Cave, Exit Cave and Port Davey) and part of Liffey Falls State Reserve, four conservation areas (Central Plateau, Oakleigh Creek, Southwest and St. Clair Lagoon), and"a number of protected areas, forest reserves as well as land verted in the Hydro-Electric Commission. Several outliers are included in the nominated area: Sarah Island Historic Site .in Macquarie Harbour; and lIe du Golfe, De Witt Island, Flat Witch Island and Maatsukyer Island off the south coast of Tasmania. Lake Gordon and some land adjoining it in the centre of this network has been developed for hydro-electric purposes and is excluded. 41°3S'-43°40'S, l4S02S'-l46°55'E. 2. JURIDICAL DATA Apart from approximately 330ha of privately-owned land in the Vale of Rasselas, on the Central Plateau and at Pillinger, land is publicly owned and includes 773,215ha under national parks, 2074h under state reserves, c.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 20 16 Highlights for 2015-16
    ANNUAL REPORT 2016 HIGHLIGHTS FOR 2015-16 • awarded $3.9 million to 135 projects in two general grant rounds • commenced a community infrastructure targeted round • delivered community forums at Bothwell, George Town, Launceston, Mornington and New Norfolk, receiving vital feedback on issues concerning communities and the Fund • initiated an emerging community leaders program. The Hon Sarah Courtney MP Parliamentary Secretary to the Premier (Community and Veterans Affairs) Parliament House HOBART TAS 7000 Dear Parliamentary Secretary I am pleased to provide the annual report of the Tasmanian Community Fund for the year ending 30 June 2016 for presentation to Parliament. This report is submitted in accordance with Section 11 of the Tasmanian Community Fund Act 2005, and marks the conclusion of the 16th year of operation of the Fund. To reflect the diversity of grants awarded by the Board the annual report focuses on the diversity of projects, locations and organisations that the Tasmanian Community Fund has supported. The Board, staff and I look forward to continuing to support many organisations making a difference in the community. Yours sincerely Lynn Mason CHAIRWOMAN 4 October 2016 CONTENTS Chairwoman’s Message 2 Senior Executive Officer’s Report 4 Grant Rounds 7 About Us 24 Applying for a Grant 32 Financial Statements 35 CHAIRWOMAN’S MESSAGE is my privilege to present this message on behalf The Board consulted a number of different groups, It of the Board of the Tasmanian Community Fund. including local government, to determine the focus of With this report the Fund informs Parliament on its a targeted round in the first six months of 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • 3966 Tour Op 4Col
    The Tasmanian Advantage natural and cultural features of Tasmania a resource manual aimed at developing knowledge and interpretive skills specific to Tasmania Contents 1 INTRODUCTION The aim of the manual Notesheets & how to use them Interpretation tips & useful references Minimal impact tourism 2 TASMANIA IN BRIEF Location Size Climate Population National parks Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area (WHA) Marine reserves Regional Forest Agreement (RFA) 4 INTERPRETATION AND TIPS Background What is interpretation? What is the aim of your operation? Principles of interpretation Planning to interpret Conducting your tour Research your content Manage the potential risks Evaluate your tour Commercial operators information 5 NATURAL ADVANTAGE Antarctic connection Geodiversity Marine environment Plant communities Threatened fauna species Mammals Birds Reptiles Freshwater fishes Invertebrates Fire Threats 6 HERITAGE Tasmanian Aboriginal heritage European history Convicts Whaling Pining Mining Coastal fishing Inland fishing History of the parks service History of forestry History of hydro electric power Gordon below Franklin dam controversy 6 WHAT AND WHERE: EAST & NORTHEAST National parks Reserved areas Great short walks Tasmanian trail Snippets of history What’s in a name? 7 WHAT AND WHERE: SOUTH & CENTRAL PLATEAU 8 WHAT AND WHERE: WEST & NORTHWEST 9 REFERENCES Useful references List of notesheets 10 NOTESHEETS: FAUNA Wildlife, Living with wildlife, Caring for nature, Threatened species, Threats 11 NOTESHEETS: PARKS & PLACES Parks & places,
    [Show full text]
  • Ultimate Cruising Guests Also Receive: Chauffeur Driven Luxury Car Transfers from Your Home to the Airport and Return (Within 35Km) Cruise Highlights
    ultimatecruising.com.au or call us on 1300 485 846 FROM $15,996pp Package #408 Revel in the opportunity to tread some of Tasmania’s greatest coastal tracks while you circumnavigate this island state by sea. Land on remote pristine beaches; trek through coastal heath, buttongrass moorlands, lush temperate rainforests and tall eucalypt woodlands; and drink in the stunning vistas from towering dolerite peaks. Explore islands whose only permanent inhabitants include Bennett’s wallabies, wombats, potoroos, possums and pademelons. Cruise the wild, storm-swept coastlines and sheltered, shimmering bays. Experience a variety of trekking treasures on Bruny, Flinders and Maria Islands. Delight in the raucousness of an Australian fur seal colony’s rocky haul-out on the Hunter Islands; the gregariousness of the gannets at Pedra Branca; and the majesty of a soaring shy albatross in the skies above Mewstone. Create and collate a treasured suite of memories – on foot or by sea – with extraordinary adventures on offer each day. This expedition is subject to regulatory approval and only open to Australian and New Zealand residents. Highlights include: Head off the ‘mother ship’ each day for a range of adventures and explorations that may include hiking options, wildlife watching, Zodiac cruises, diving^, snorkelling^, climbing^ or kayaking^ Access some of the best (and least) known walks in Tasmania, including those on Bruny, Flinders and Maria Islands, and the Hunter and Kent Island Groups On Maria Island – nicknamed Tasmania’s “Noah’s Ark” – enjoy an
    [Show full text]
  • Wellington Park Historic Tracks and Huts Network Comparative Analysis
    THE HISTORIC TRACK & HUT NETWORK OF THE HOBART FACE OF MOUNT WELLINGTON Interim Report Comparative Analysis & Significance Assessment Anne McConnell MAY 2012 For the Wellington Park Management Trust, Hobart. Anne D. McConnell Consultant - Cultural Heritage Management, Archaeology & Quaternary Geoscience; GPO Box 234, Hobart, Tasmania, 7001. Background to Report This report presents the comparative analysis and significance assessment findings for the historic track and hut network on the Hobart-face of Mount Wellington as part of the Wellington Park Historic Track & Hut Network Assessment Project. This report is provided as the deliverable for the second milestone for the project. The Wellington Park Historic Track & Hut Network Assessment Project is a project of the Wellington Park Management Trust. The project is funded by a grant from the Tasmanian government Urban Renewal and Heritage Fund (URHF). The project is being undertaken on a consultancy basis by the author, Anne McConnell. The data contained in this assessment will be integrated into the final project report in approximately the same format as presented here. Image above: Holiday Rambles in Tasmania – Ascending Mt Wellington, 1885. [Source – State Library of Victoria] Cover Image: Mount Wellington Map, 1937, VW Hodgman [Source – State Library of Tasmania] i CONTENTS page no 1 BACKGROUND - THE EVOLUTION OF 1 THE TRACK & HUT NETWORK 1.1 The Evolution of the Track Network 1 2.2 The Evolution of the Huts 18 2 A CONTEXT FOR THE TRACK & HUT 29 NETWORK – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS 2.1
    [Show full text]
  • CHANGES in SOUTHWESTERN TASMANIAN FIRE REGIMES SINCE the EARLY 1800S
    Papers and Proceedings o/the Royal Society o/Tasmania, Volume 132, 1998 IS CHANGES IN SOUTHWESTERN TASMANIAN FIRE REGIMES SINCE THE EARLY 1800s by Jon B. Marsden-Smedley (with five tables and one text-figure) MARSDEN-SMEDLEY, ].B., 1998 (31:xii): Changes in southwestern Tasmanian fire regimes since the early 1800s. Pap.Proc. R. Soc. Tasm. 132: 15-29. ISSN 0040-4703. School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252-78, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7001. There have been major changes in the fire regime of southwestern Tasmania over the past 170 years. The fire regime has changed from an Aboriginal fire regime of frequent low-intensity fires in buttongrass moorland (mostly in spring and autumn) with only the occasional high-intensity forest fire, to the early European fire regime of frequent high-intensity fires in all vegetation types, to a regime of low to medium intensity buttongrass moorland fires and finally to the current regime of few fires. These changes in the fire regime resulted in major impacts to the region's fire-sensitive vegetation types during the early European period, while the current low fire frequency across much of southwestern Tasmania has resulted in a large proportion of the region's fire-adapted buttongrass moorland being classified as old-growth. These extensive areas of old-growth buttongrass moorland mean that the potential for another large-scale ecologically damaging wildfire is high and, to avoid this, it would be better to re-introduce a regime oflow-intensity fires into the region. Key Words: fire regimes, fire management, southwestern Tasmania, Aboriginal fire, history.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation of Natural Wilderness Values in the Port Davey Marine and Estuarine Protected Area, South-Western Tasmania
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION: MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS Aquatic Conserv: Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 20: 297–311 (2010) Published online 3 December 2009 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/aqc.1079 Conservation of natural wilderness values in the Port Davey marine and estuarine protected area, south-western Tasmania GRAHAM J. EDGARa,b,Ã, PETER R. LASTc, NEVILLE S. BARRETTb, KAREN GOWLETT-HOLMESc, MICHAEL DRIESSENd and PETER MOONEYe aAquenal Pty Ltd, GPO Box 828, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7001 bTasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252-49, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7001 cCSIRO Divison of Marine and Atmospheric Research, Castray Esplanade, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7000 dDepartment of Primary Industries and Water, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7000 eParks and Wildlife Service, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7000 ABSTRACT 1. Port Davey and associated Bathurst Harbour in south-western Tasmania represent one of the world’s most anomalous estuarine systems owing to an unusual combination of environmental factors. These include: (i) large uninhabited catchment protected as a National Park; (ii) ria geomorphology but with fjord characteristics that include a shallow entrance and deep 12-km long channel connecting an almost land-locked harbour to the sea; (iii) high rainfall and riverine input that generate strongly-stratified estuarine conditions, with a low-salinity surface layer and marine bottom water; (iv) a deeply tannin-stained surface layer that blocks light penetration to
    [Show full text]
  • Paradoxes of Protection Evolution of the Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service and National Parks and Reserved Lands System
    Paradoxes of Protection Evolution of the Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service and National Parks and Reserved Lands System By Dr Louise Crossley May 2009 A Report for Senator Christine Milne www.christinemilne.org.au Australian Greens Cover image: Lake Gwendolen from the track to the summit of Frenchmans Cap, Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Photo: Matt Newton Photography Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 1 1. THE INITIAL ESTABLISHMENT OF PARKS AND RESERVES; UTILITARIANS VERSUS CONSERVATIONISTS 1915-1970....................................................................... 3 1.1 The Scenery Preservation Board as the first manager of reserved lands ............................................................ 3 1.2 Extension of the reserved lands system ................................................................................................................... 3 1.3The wilderness value of wasteland ........................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Inadequacies of the Scenery Protection Board ...................................................................................................... 4 2. THE ESTABLISHMENT AND ‘GLORY DAYS’ OF THE NATIONAL PARKS AND WILDLIFE SERVICE 1971-81 ........................................................................................... 6 2.1 The demise of the Scenery Preservation Board and the Lake Pedder controversy
    [Show full text]
  • Reimagining the Visitor Experience of Tasmania's Wilderness World
    Reimagining the Visitor Experience of Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area Ecotourism Investment Profile Reimagining the Visitor Experience of Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area: Ecotourism Investment Profile This report was commissioned by Tourism Industry Council Tasmania and the Cradle Coast Authority, in partnership with the Tasmanian Government through Tourism Tasmania and the Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service. This report is co-funded by the Australian Government under the Tourism Industry Regional Development Fund Grants Programme. This report has been prepared by EC3 Global, TRC Tourism and Tourism Industry Council Tasmania. Date prepared: June 2014 Design by Halibut Creative Collective. Disclaimer The information and recommendations provided in this report are made on the basis of information available at the time of preparation. While all care has been taken to check and validate material presented in this report, independent research should be undertaken before any action or decision is taken on the basis of material contained in this report. This report does not seek to provide any assurance of project viability and EC3 Global, TRC Tourism and Tourism Industry Council Tasmania accept no liability for decisions made or the information provided in this report. Cover photo: Huon Pine Walk Corinna The Tarkine - Rob Burnett & Tourism Tasmania Contents Background...............................................................2 Reimagining the Visitor Experience of the TWWHA .................................................................5
    [Show full text]