Trace Elements in Marine Sediments from the Oxfordian (Late Jurassic)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Cambrian Phytoplankton of the Brunovistulicum – Taxonomy and Biostratigraphy
MONIKA JACHOWICZ-ZDANOWSKA Cambrian phytoplankton of the Brunovistulicum – taxonomy and biostratigraphy Polish Geological Institute Special Papers,28 WARSZAWA 2013 CONTENTS Introduction...........................................................6 Geological setting and lithostratigraphy.............................................8 Summary of Cambrian chronostratigraphy and acritarch biostratigraphy ...........................13 Review of previous palynological studies ...........................................17 Applied techniques and material studied............................................18 Biostratigraphy ........................................................23 BAMA I – Pulvinosphaeridium antiquum–Pseudotasmanites Assemblage Zone ....................25 BAMA II – Asteridium tornatum–Comasphaeridium velvetum Assemblage Zone ...................27 BAMA III – Ichnosphaera flexuosa–Comasphaeridium molliculum Assemblage Zone – Acme Zone .........30 BAMA IV – Skiagia–Eklundia campanula Assemblage Zone ..............................39 BAMA V – Skiagia–Eklundia varia Assemblage Zone .................................39 BAMA VI – Volkovia dentifera–Liepaina plana Assemblage Zone (Moczyd³owska, 1991) ..............40 BAMA VII – Ammonidium bellulum–Ammonidium notatum Assemblage Zone ....................40 BAMA VIII – Turrisphaeridium semireticulatum Assemblage Zone – Acme Zone...................41 BAMA IX – Adara alea–Multiplicisphaeridium llynense Assemblage Zone – Acme Zone...............42 Regional significance of the biostratigraphic -
Felix Gradstein, Lames Ogg and Alan Smith 18 the Jurassic Period J
Felix Gradstein, lames ogg and Alan smith 18 The Jurassic Period J. G. OGG iographic distribution of Jurassic GSSPs that have been ratified (ye Table 18.1 for more extensive listing). GSSPs for the honds) or are candidates (squares) on a mid-Jurassic map base-Jurassic, Late Jurassic stages, and some Middle Jurassic stages PNS in January 2004; see Table 2.3). Overlaps in Europe have are undefined. The projection center is at 30" E to place the center kured some GSSPs, and not all candidate sections are indicated of the continents in the center of the map. basaurs dominated theland surface. Ammonites are themain fossils neously considered his unit to he older. Alexander Brongniart rmrrelatingmarine deposits. Pangea supercontinent began to break (1829) coined the term "Terrains Jurassiques" when correlat- h md at the end of the Middle Jurassic the Central Atlantic was ing the "Jura Kalkstein" to the Lower Oolite Series (now as- m. Organic-rich sediments in several locations eventually became signed to Middle Jurassic) of the British succession. Leopold t source rocks helping to fuel modern civilization. von Buch (1839) established a three-fold subdivision for the Jurassic. The basic framework of von Buch has been retained as the three Jurassic series, although the nomenclature has var- 8.1 HISTORY AND SUBDIVISIONS ied (Black-Brown-White, Lias-Dogger-Malm, and currently L1.1 Overview of the Jurassic Lower-Middle-Upper). The immense wealth of fossils, particularly ammonites, in hc term "Jura Kalkstein" was applied by Alexander von the Jurassic strata of Britain, France, German5 and Switzer- bmholdt (1799) to a series ofcarhonate shelfdeposits exposed land was a magnet for innovative geologists, and modern con- the mountainous Jura region of northernmost Switzerland, cepts of hiostratigraphy, chronostratigraphy, correlation, and d he first recognized that these strata were distinct from paleogeography grew out of their studies. -
Stuttgarter Beiträge Zur Naturkunde
ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Stuttgarter Beiträge Naturkunde Serie B [Paläontologie] Jahr/Year: 1977 Band/Volume: 26_B Autor(en)/Author(s): Ziegler Bernhard Artikel/Article: The "White" (Upper) Jurassic in Southern Germany 1- 79 5T(J 71^^-7 © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde Herausgegeben vom Staatlichen Museum für Naturkunde in Stuttgart Serie B (Geologie und Paläontologie), Nr. 26 .,.wr-..^ns > Stuttgart 1977 APR 1 U 19/0 The "White" (Upper) Jurassic D in Southern Germany By Bernhard Ziegler, Stuttgart With 11 plates and 42 figures 1. Introduction The Upper part of the Jurassic sequence in southern Germany is named the "White Jurassic" due to the light colour of its rocks. It does not correspond exactly to the Upper Jurassic as defined by the International Colloquium on the Jurassic System in Luxembourg (1962), because the lower Oxfordian is included in the "Brown Jurassic", and because the upper Tithonian is missing. The White Jurassic covers more than 10 000 square kilometers between the upper Main river near Staffelstein in northern Bavaria and the Swiss border west of the lake of Konstanz. It builds up the Swabian and the Franconian Alb. Because the Upper Jurassic consists mainly of light limestones and calcareous marls which are more resistent to the erosion than the clays and marls of the underlying Brown (middle) Jurassic it forms a steep escarpment directed to the west and northwest. To the south the White Jurassic dips below the Tertiary beds of the Molasse trough. -
PALEOMAP Paleodigital Elevation Models (Paleodems) for the Phanerozoic
PALEOMAP Paleodigital Elevation Models (PaleoDEMS) for the Phanerozoic by Christopher R. Scotese Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, 60202 cscotese @ gmail.com and Nicky Wright Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University [email protected] August 1, 2018 2 Abstract A paleo-digital elevation model (paleoDEM) is a digital representation of paleotopography and paleobathymetry that has been "reconstructed" back in time. This report describes how the 117 PALEOMAP paleoDEMS (see Supplementary Materials) were made and how they can be used to produce detailed paleogeographic maps. The geological time interval and the age of each paleoDEM is listed in Table 1. The paleoDEMS describe the changing distribution of deep oceans, shallow seas, lowlands, and mountainous regions during the last 540 million years (myr) at 5 myr intervals. Each paleoDEM is an estimate of the elevation of the land surface and depth of the ocean basins measured in meters (m) at a resolution of 1x1 degrees. The paleoDEMs are available in two formats: (1) a simple text file that lists the latitude, longitude and elevation of each grid point; and (2) as a netcdf file. The paleoDEMs have been used to produce: a set of paleogeographic maps for the Phanerozoic, a simulation of the Earth’s past climate and paleoceanography, animations of the paleogeographic history of the world’s oceans and continents, and an estimate of the changing area of land, mountains, shallow seas, and deep oceans through time. A complete set of the PALEOMAP PaleoDEMs can be downloaded at https://www.earthbyte.org/paleodem-resource-scotese-and-wright-2018/. -
Basin-Platform Transitions in Upper Jurassic Limestones and Dolomites of the Northern Franconian Alb (Germany)
Zitteliana An International Journal of Palaeontology and Geobiology Series B/Reihe B Abhandlungen der Bayerischen Staatssammlung für Pa lä on to lo gie und Geologie 26 4th International Symposium on Lithographic Limestone and Plattenkalk Eichstätt/Solnhofen, Germany September 12th-18th, 2005 Organised by Martina Kölbl-Ebert Jura-Museum, Eichstätt Martin Röper Bürgermeister-Müller-Museum, Solnhofen Reinhold R. Leinfelder Staatliche Naturwissenschaftliche Sammlungen Bayerns, LMUMünchen, Department für Geo- und Umweltwissenschaften, Sektion Paläontologie, and GeoBio-CenterLMU − Abstracts and Field Trip Guides − Zitteliana B 26 96 Seiten München, 05.09.2005 ISSN 1612-4138 Editors-in-Chief/Herausgeber: Reinhold R. Leinfelder, Michael Krings Volume Editor: Winfried Werner Production and Layout/Bildbearbeitung und Layout: Stefanie Klug Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie Richard-Wagner-Str. 10, D-80333 München, Deutschland http://www.palaeo.de/zitteliana email: [email protected] Für den Inhalt der Arbeiten sind die Autoren allein ver ant wort lich. Authors are solely responsible for the contents of their articles. Copyright © 2005 by Bayerische Staatssammlung für Pa lä on to lo gie und Geologie, München Die in der Zitteliana veröffentlichten Arbeiten sind urheberrechtlich geschützt. Nachdruck, Vervielfältigungen auf photomechanischem, elektronischem oder anderem Wege sowie die Anfertigung von Übersetzungen oder die Nut zung in Vorträgen, für Funk und Fernsehen oder im Internet bleiben – auch auszugsweise – vorbehalten und bedürfen der schriftlichen Ge neh mi gung durch die Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie, München. ISSN 1612-4138 Druck: Gebr. Geiselberger GmbH, Altötting Published with the support of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Cover illustration: Mesolimulus walchi DESMAREST; horse-shoe crab with its trail; Lower Tithonian, Solnhofen (BSPG AS I 944). -
Cross Cordillera Field Trip Guide
GS Field Trip: End of Summer 2016 GS191/291 (Miller, no Klemperer (went to Tibet), Lund Snee, Gottlieb) Listed as Fall Quarter class under Miller Crossing the Cordillera: From the Colorado Plateau to the Sierra Nevada Field trip (1 credit), advanced ugrad to grad level, but all welcome Dates: September 15 to Sept. 21 (T.A. Eric Gottlieb) There is unprecedented controversy about the paleo-topographic evolution of the western United States. How thick and how high was the crust following Mesozoic crustal shortening? Did the region between the Sierra Nevada and the Colorado Plateau form a high plateau, the Nevadaplano, underlain by 60 km thick crust? When did this thick crust collapse to its present crustal thickness of only 30 km? Did extension happen as a result of, during and shortly after crustal thickening? Or did extension take place only in the Miocene, during formation of Basin and Range topography? How much stretching is represented by Basin and Range faulting? Can it account for thinning of crust by 30 km? This field trip will provide you with an exceptional opportunity to view a complete cross-section of the geology of the southern part of the North American Cordillera, from the undeformed Colorado Plateau on the east to Mount Whitney and the Mesozoic Sierra Nevada arc on the west. With these big questions in mind, our stops will focus on Mesozoic shortening, when the Cordillera is believed to have looked like the Andes, and on younger extensional structures (including a variety faults in Death Valley), with a critical view and discussion of age, geometry and offset along normal faults. -
International Chronostratigraphic Chart
INTERNATIONAL CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHIC CHART www.stratigraphy.org International Commission on Stratigraphy v 2018/07 numerical numerical numerical Eonothem numerical Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age GSSP GSSP GSSP GSSP EonothemErathem / Eon System / Era / Period age (Ma) EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) / Eon Erathem / Era System / Period GSSA age (Ma) present ~ 145.0 358.9 ± 0.4 541.0 ±1.0 U/L Meghalayan 0.0042 Holocene M Northgrippian 0.0082 Tithonian Ediacaran L/E Greenlandian 152.1 ±0.9 ~ 635 Upper 0.0117 Famennian Neo- 0.126 Upper Kimmeridgian Cryogenian Middle 157.3 ±1.0 Upper proterozoic ~ 720 Pleistocene 0.781 372.2 ±1.6 Calabrian Oxfordian Tonian 1.80 163.5 ±1.0 Frasnian Callovian 1000 Quaternary Gelasian 166.1 ±1.2 2.58 Bathonian 382.7 ±1.6 Stenian Middle 168.3 ±1.3 Piacenzian Bajocian 170.3 ±1.4 Givetian 1200 Pliocene 3.600 Middle 387.7 ±0.8 Meso- Zanclean Aalenian proterozoic Ectasian 5.333 174.1 ±1.0 Eifelian 1400 Messinian Jurassic 393.3 ±1.2 7.246 Toarcian Devonian Calymmian Tortonian 182.7 ±0.7 Emsian 1600 11.63 Pliensbachian Statherian Lower 407.6 ±2.6 Serravallian 13.82 190.8 ±1.0 Lower 1800 Miocene Pragian 410.8 ±2.8 Proterozoic Neogene Sinemurian Langhian 15.97 Orosirian 199.3 ±0.3 Lochkovian Paleo- 2050 Burdigalian Hettangian 201.3 ±0.2 419.2 ±3.2 proterozoic 20.44 Mesozoic Rhaetian Pridoli Rhyacian Aquitanian 423.0 ±2.3 23.03 ~ 208.5 Ludfordian 2300 Cenozoic Chattian Ludlow 425.6 ±0.9 Siderian 27.82 Gorstian -
Newsletter 94 2 Editorial
The Palaeontology Newsletter Contents 94 Editorial 2 Association Business 3 Annual Meeting 2017 3 Prizes & Awards at Lyon 9 Association Meetings 21 PalAss is 60 23 News 27 Lyme Regis Fossil Festival 33 From our correspondents Legends of Rock: Isabel Cookson 34 Behind the scenes at the Museum 36 Brief Moments 40 R for palaeontologists 44 Advertisement: Hills of Hame 55 Future meetings of other bodies 56 Meeting Reports 63 Mystery Fossil 25 71 Outreach Report 72 Grant and Bursary Reports 74 Book Reviews 97 Careering off course! 103 Palaeontology vol. 60 parts 1 & 2 105–106 Papers in Palaeontology, Virtual Palaeontology 107 Reminder: The deadline for copy for Issue no. 95 is 5th June 2017. On the Web: <http://www.palass.org/> ISSN: 0954-9900 Newsletter 94 2 Editorial Welcome to the first issue of the PalAss Newsletter for 2017, and what a historic year this is: the 60th anniversary of the Association. From humble beginnings as an informal dining club, the Association has evolved into one of the premier global organisations for promoting palaeontology and its allied sciences. Of particular note is how the Association’s initial activities – the establishment of the journal Palaeontology, the Newsletter and a ‘Discussion Meeting’ – have expanded into a substantial portfolio of activities that, in addition to these early bastions of the Association, include an impressive array of grant programmes, awards and honours, support of palaeontology-themed sessions at meetings of other bodies, and a strong presence at key public outreach events for palaeontology, all of which can be explored via the newsletter or the Association’s website. -
Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura) Including Four New Families, Four New Genera, and Five New Species
Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien 110 A 55–121 Wien, Jänner 2009 Revision of the Prosopinae sensu GLAESSNER, 1969 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura) including four new families, four new genera, and five new species By Carrie E. SCHWEITZER1 & Rodney M. FELDMANN2 (With 10 figures and 8 tables) Manuscript submitted on October 16th 2007, the revised manuscript on February 6th 2008 Summary Re-evaluation of the Prosopinae VON MEYER, 1860 (sensu GLAESSNER, 1969) has resulted in placement of the included genera into two superfamilies, the Homolodromioidea ALCOCK, 1900, and Glaessneropsoidea PATRULIUS, 1959. The previously recognized Goniodromitidae BEURLEN, 1932, and Tanidromitidae SCHWEITZER & FELDMANN, 2008 [imprint 2007], are confirmed as belonging to the Homolodromioidea. New taxa recognized herein include four new families, Bucculentidae, Lecythocaridae, Longodromitidae, and Nodoprosopidae; four new genera, Abyssophthalmus, Bucculentum, Protuberosa, and Verrucarcinus; five new species, Bucculentum bachmayeri, Glaessneropsis myrmekia, G. tribulosa, Lecythocaris obesa, and Prosopon abbreviatum; and eight new combinations. Taxa are classified based upon a comprehensive array of characters including features of the orbits and rostrum; the nature and development of the carapace grooves; and the development of the dorsal and subdorsal carapace regions. A new term is defined, augen- rest, for the concavity in the dorsal carapace or frontal margin of the carapace that lies distal to the orbit to house the eye. Recognition of two superfamilies for these taxa confirms the previous hypotheses of FELDMANN et al. (2006), SCHWEITZER et al. (2007), and SCHWEITZER & FELDMANN (2008 [imprint 2007]) that Jurassic Brachyura were much more diverse than previously recognized. Keywords: Prosopinae, Brachyura, Decapoda, Revision, New Taxa, Jurassic Introduction The Prosopidae VON MEYER, 1860, has conventionally been considered one of the basal families within the Dromiacea DE HAAN, 1833, and to be among the oldest and most primitive brachyuran groups. -
Field Trip Post-EX-5 Mass Transport Deposits, Geometry, Depositional
ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Berichte der Geologischen Bundesanstalt Jahr/Year: 2018 Band/Volume: 126 Autor(en)/Author(s): Gawlick Hans-Jürgen, Suzuki Hisashi, Missoni Sigrid Artikel/Article: Field Trip Postâ€E Xâ€5 Mass transport deposits, geometry, depositional regime and biostratigraphy in a Late Jurassic carbonateâ€c lastic radiolaritic basin fill (Northern Calcareous Alps) 259-288 XXI International Congress of the Carpathian Balkan Geological Association (CBGA 2018) Berichte der Geologischen Bundesanstalt, v. 126, p. 259 – 288 Field Trip Post‐EX‐5 Mass transport deposits, geometry, depositional regime and biostratigraphy in a Late Jurassic carbonate‐clastic radiolaritic basin fill (Northern Calcareous Alps) HANS‐JÜRGEN GAWLICK1, HISASHI SUZUKI2 & SIGRID MISSONI1 1 University of Leoben, Department of Applied Geosciences and Geophysics, Petroleum Geology, Peter‐Tunner‐ Strasse 5, 8700 Leoben, Austria. hans‐[email protected] 2 Otani University, Kyoto 603‐8143, Japan Abstract This field trip will provide insights in the geometry of a Late Jurassic deep‐water radiolaritic trench‐like basin, which formation started in the Oxfordian. The Oxfordian phase (first cycle) of the marine basin evolution is characterized by a coarsening‐upward trend in deposition, reflecting a compressional regime. In the mass transport deposits only redeposited Late Triassic to Middle Jurassic clasts occur. In the Kimmeridgian (second cycle) grey‐greenish radiolarite deposition in a starved environment dominated. In the Tithonian (third cycle) restarted sediment recycling. The general sedimentation trend is a fining‐upward cycle indicating an extensional regime. At the beginning of this third cycle, the mass‐transport deposits contain (predominantly) Late Triassic to rare Jurassic clasts. -
A Compilation and Review of the Literature on Triassic, Jurassic, and Earliest Cretaceous Dinoflagellate Cysts
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NERC Open Research Archive A COMPILATION AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON TRIASSIC, JURASSIC, AND EARLIEST CRETACEOUS DINOFLAGELLATE CYSTS JAMES B. RIDING British Geological Survey Environmental Science Centre Keyworth Nottingham NG12 5GG United Kingdom e‐mail: [email protected] Abstract Triassic and Jurassic dinoflagellate cysts are ideal index fossils because they are typically geographically extensive, and many taxa have relatively short ranges and/or well‐defined range tops/bases. Consequently they are extensively utilized in geological problem‐solving in both the industrial and academic spheres. A comprehensive list of the literature on Triassic to earliest Cretaceous organic‐walled dinoflagellate cysts comprises 1347 publications with every continent being represented. The most significant publications are highlighted with an asterisk and each item of literature is briefly described by the use of a string of keywords that indicate the scientific scope, the stratigraphic interval covered, and the geographic focus. These publications are dominated (45.4%) by contributions from West Europe, where the type sections are all located. The next best‐studied regions are the Arctic (7.5%), Australasia (7.1%), and East Europe (5.5%). Other regions, namely Africa, Central America, North America, South America, Antarctica, China, the Indian subcontinent, the Middle East, and Russia, each represent less than 5% of the literature on this topic. Most publications are focused on the Late Jurassic. This is largely because of the extensive nature of Upper Jurassic marine strata and the diverse nature of Late Jurassic dinoflagellate cysts. -
Stuttgarter Beiträge Zur Naturkunde
ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Stuttgarter Beiträge Naturkunde Serie B [Paläontologie] Jahr/Year: 1977 Band/Volume: 23_B Autor(en)/Author(s): Gwinner Manfred P. Artikel/Article: Geological Structure and History of Southwestern Germany 1-6 © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde Herausgegeben vom Staatlichen Museum für Naturkunde in Stuttgart — ' 3. ZOO' Serie B (Geologie und Paläontologie), Nr. 23 \"rY Stuttgart 1977 o. R 1 1978 Geological Structure and History oi Southwestern Germany by Manfred P. Gwinner, Stuttgart With 2 figures The southwestern part oi Germany can be divided into the following geological Units by using criteria of their geological history as well as of their recent geological and structural Status (fig. l). 1. Pre-Upper Carboniferous (to Permian) basement formed by several geotectonic processes of metamorphism and magmatism, the latest one being the Variscan (Hercynian) orogeny. This basement is exposed in the Black Forest (Schwarzwald), the Odenwald, and on the opposite (western) side of the Upper Rhine Graben in the Vosges mountains (Fig. 2).It consists of two major units: 1.1 Pre-Variscan (-Hercynian) Gneiss series of complex history. Metamorphosis led to the formation of gneisses, mostly paragneisses even before the Variscan orogeny. If there has ever been a depth zone with phyllitic metamor- phites or mica shists, such rocks must have been eroded or destroyed otherwise already before Sedimentation of the permo-mesozoic cover series. The gneisses of the Black Forest were partly altered by migmatisation (Anatexis) which occured during the Variscan orogeny.