DOCSLIB.ORG

Cross Cordillera Field Trip Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cross Cordillera Field Trip Guide GS Field Trip: End of Summer 2016 GS191/291 (Miller, no Klemperer (went to Tibet), Lund Snee, Gottlieb) Listed as Fall Quarter class under Miller Crossing the Cordillera: From the Colorado Plateau to the Sierra Nevada Field trip (1 credit), advanced ugrad to grad level, but all welcome Dates: September 15 to Sept. 21 (T.A. Eric Gottlieb) There is unprecedented controversy about the paleo-topographic evolution of the western United States. How thick and how high was the crust following Mesozoic crustal shortening? Did the region between the Sierra Nevada and the Colorado Plateau form a high plateau, the Nevadaplano, underlain by 60 km thick crust? When did this thick crust collapse to its present crustal thickness of only 30 km? Did extension happen as a result of, during and shortly after crustal thickening? Or did extension take place only in the Miocene, during formation of Basin and Range topography? How much stretching is represented by Basin and Range faulting? Can it account for thinning of crust by 30 km? This field trip will provide you with an exceptional opportunity to view a complete cross-section of the geology of the southern part of the North American Cordillera, from the undeformed Colorado Plateau on the east to Mount Whitney and the Mesozoic Sierra Nevada arc on the west. With these big questions in mind, our stops will focus on Mesozoic shortening, when the Cordillera is believed to have looked like the Andes, and on younger extensional structures (including a variety faults in Death Valley), with a critical view and discussion of age, geometry and offset along normal faults. Journal articles, field trip guidebooks and maps will be available before and during the trip. It will be quite hot but cooler in the evenings. Some of our camping is wilderness camping. Small tent, sleeping bag, etc., suggested. Aerial view of the Cretaceous Keystone thrust system, outside of Las Vegas: thrust fault places grey Cambrian limestone on top of red and white Jurassic Aztec sandstone 1 Introduction This trip will provide an exceptional opportunity to view a complete cross-section of the geology of the southern part of the North American Cordillera, from the Colorado Plateau to the Sierra Nevada. We will focus on the older Mesozoic history of shortening within the Cordillera, when it is believed to have looked like the Andes or southern British Columbia Rocky Mountain fold and thrust belt, as well as its younger history of Cenozoic extension and faulting, which has significantly chopped up and complicated our view of the older geology. Cenozoic normal faults are particularly controversial in terms of their style, geometry and amount of slip, and we will see faults that exhibit the observed range of geometries, dips, and slip amounts. Several of our stops in the western part of our transect will highlight metamorphic and igneous rocks of both Mesozoic and Cenozoic age to evaluate the roles and relationships between deformation, metamorphism and magmatism at deeper crustal levels of the Cordillera. The following section provides thumbnail sketches of what we will be visiting. Approximate routes and mileages follow. Original descriptions and references (if available) are in in the Appendix at the rear of the guidebook. These descriptions are resurrected from hard-to-find field trip guides that still form an important part of the “grey literature” of the geology of the west. It’s work in progress! Fig. 1. The “big picture”: Index geologic map of the western U.S. 2 Fig. 2. Combined California and Nevada state geologic maps. 3 Itinerary and Stops Day 1 (Sept. 15): Drive to campsite outside of Las Vegas in the Spring Mountains (Sites 1 and 2, Hilltop Campground, Spring Mountains National Recreation Area: 36.309345º, -115.607200º, Reservation numbers: 2- 36397156 & 2-36397155, Contact: 888-448-1474). Directions from I-15 northbound, starting south of Vegas. Sept. 15 Thursday Day 1: Drive to campsite outside of Las Vegas in the Spring Mountains The Spring Mountains constitute a large intact structural block that was little-affected by Cenozoic faulting, so it’s a great place to study Paleozoic stratigraphy and Mesozoic thrust fault history. The Spring Mountains expose a series of thrust faults that carry increasingly thick sections of Paleozoic stratigraphy in their hanging walls. Fig. 3. Tectonic sketch map of the Spring Mountains showing the various Mesozoic thrust plates, emplaced from NW to the SE (from Burchfiel et al., 1974). 4 Day 2 (Sept. 16): Overview: We begin our tour with the stratigraphy of the “foreland” of the Cordillera, known as the “Grand Canyon sequence” a thin platformal sequence that covered the western portion of the North American continent after it rifted away from another continent > 600 Ma. This initial rifting led to the deposition of the Cordilleran passive margin sequence in the Paleozoic. The platformal sequence is exposed at Frenchman Mountain, east of Las Vegas, where we will see its basal unconformity above > 1.7 Ga metamorphic and igneous rocks of the North American craton. We will then examine some of the major Mesozoic thrust faults of the Sevier foreland fold and thrust belt. These emplace thicker stratigraphic sequences of the Cordilleran passive margin (subsiding continental shelf) eastward across the much thinner cratonic sequence. We will have ample opportunity to view and learn about the units of the Cordilleran passive margin and you will want of refer frequently to the stratigraphic columns included in this guide. We will discuss the timing of thrusting (Mesozoic) and proceed westwards through the thrust belt, looking at the Red Springs and Keystone thrust faults. Stop 1: The Great Unconformity at Frenchman Mountain. Driving: From Hilltop Campground (1.25 hr / 51 mi without traffic). East on Lake Mead Blvd to where the road passes over the northern part of Frenchman Mountain. Stop and hike to see basal unconformity and talk about the stratified units of the platform sequence and their thicknesses. Reference: Steve Rowland, Geology UNLV. http://geoscience.unlv.edu/pub/rowland/Virtual/virtualfm.html Fig. 4. Location map to Frenchman Mountain. 5 Fig. 5. Google image of Frenchman Mountain. Fig. 6. The basal unconformity is defined by the Tapeats Sandstone (~ 500 Ma) that lies above the Vishnu Schist (1.7 Ga and older here). Reference: Steve Rowland, Geology UNLV, http://geoscience.unlv.edu/pub/rowland/Virtual/virtualfm.html Looking south. Altogether the section above the unconformity is less than 5 km thick. Let’s compare that to the shelf sequences deposited to the west in the next stops and on the next figures! 6 The Great Unconformity is best known from dramatic exposures in the Inner Gorge of the Grand Canyon. The unconformity was named by Clarence Dutton in his 1882 book Tertiary History of the Grand Cañon District. People are sometimes surprised to learn that at Frenchman Mountain they can visit the Great Unconformity without taking a long hike down into a deep canyon. Thank you, Miocene Basin and Range faulting and tilting! Let’s estimate the tilt of units here and the probable geometry of the normal fault bounding Frenchman Mountain. Fig. 7. Cross Section of Frenchman Mountain by James E. Faulds. Reference: Steve Rowland, Geology UNLV, http://geoscience.unlv.edu/pub/rowland/Virtual/virtualfm.html Note that the horizontal and vertical scales are the same and that most of these faults (except for the range-bounding fault) have small displacements. Questions: What do you think of the angles between faults and bedding? Does the Frenchman Mountain normal fault (which bounds the western side of Frenchman Mt.) bottom into a detachment fault with 80 km of net slip? Or does it merge at depth with the DBTZ and is motion compensated by flow of the crust below? The cartoon below illustrates one of the end-member interpretations of what happens to normal faults at depth. Here they are shown as merging into a brittle shallow angle detachment fault with a significant magnitude of slip, increasing to the west! The alternative end-member interpretation is that normal faults merge down into a brittle-ductile transition zone in the crust where their horizontal component of slip is matched by ductile stretching and flow beneath (e.g. the McKenzie pure shear model below): 7 Fig. 8. Cartoon of the low angle brittle fault model of Wernicke (19XX) (top) from Steve Rowland, Geology UNLV, http://geoscience.unlv.edu/pub/rowland/Virtual/virtualfm.html, the classic uniform pure shear model of McKenzie (reference) (middle and a crustal scale cross section from the Sierra east by Surpless et al. (2002) illustrating the Stanford view of normal faults. Stops 2 and 3: Red Rock Canyon Scenic area Driving Directions from the Las Vegas Strip south of Russell Road: Get on to the I-15 south Take exit 36 for Russell Road/215 west Keep left at the fork, follow signs for Interstate 15 south Keep right at the fork, follow signs for 215 west and merge onto 215 west for 13.5 miles Take exit 26 for Charleston Boulevard and turn left Continue onto State Route 159/ West Charleston Boulevard for 5.5 miles. Turn right into the entrance of Red RockCanyon National Conservation Area Driving Directions from State Route 160:Get on to the I-15. Take exit 33 toward State Route160 west /Blue Diamond Road. Keep right at the fork and merge onto State Route 160 west /Blue Diamond Road for 10.5 miles. Turn right onto State Route 159 east/Charleston Boulevard (opposite the gas station) drive for 10.5 miles. Turn left into the entrance of Red Rock Canyon. Fig. 9. Driving to Red Rock Canyon 8 Fig. 10.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cambrian Phytoplankton of the Brunovistulicum – Taxonomy and Biostratigraphy
    MONIKA JACHOWICZ-ZDANOWSKA Cambrian phytoplankton of the Brunovistulicum – taxonomy and biostratigraphy Polish Geological Institute Special Papers,28 WARSZAWA 2013 CONTENTS Introduction...........................................................6 Geological setting and lithostratigraphy.............................................8 Summary of Cambrian chronostratigraphy and acritarch biostratigraphy ...........................13 Review of previous palynological studies ...........................................17 Applied techniques and material studied............................................18 Biostratigraphy ........................................................23 BAMA I – Pulvinosphaeridium antiquum–Pseudotasmanites Assemblage Zone ....................25 BAMA II – Asteridium tornatum–Comasphaeridium velvetum Assemblage Zone ...................27 BAMA III – Ichnosphaera flexuosa–Comasphaeridium molliculum Assemblage Zone – Acme Zone .........30 BAMA IV – Skiagia–Eklundia campanula Assemblage Zone ..............................39 BAMA V – Skiagia–Eklundia varia Assemblage Zone .................................39 BAMA VI – Volkovia dentifera–Liepaina plana Assemblage Zone (Moczyd³owska, 1991) ..............40 BAMA VII – Ammonidium bellulum–Ammonidium notatum Assemblage Zone ....................40 BAMA VIII – Turrisphaeridium semireticulatum Assemblage Zone – Acme Zone...................41 BAMA IX – Adara alea–Multiplicisphaeridium llynense Assemblage Zone – Acme Zone...............42 Regional significance of the biostratigraphic
    [Show full text]
  • Felix Gradstein, Lames Ogg and Alan Smith 18 the Jurassic Period J
    Felix Gradstein, lames ogg and Alan smith 18 The Jurassic Period J. G. OGG iographic distribution of Jurassic GSSPs that have been ratified (ye Table 18.1 for more extensive listing). GSSPs for the honds) or are candidates (squares) on a mid-Jurassic map base-Jurassic, Late Jurassic stages, and some Middle Jurassic stages PNS in January 2004; see Table 2.3). Overlaps in Europe have are undefined. The projection center is at 30" E to place the center kured some GSSPs, and not all candidate sections are indicated of the continents in the center of the map. basaurs dominated theland surface. Ammonites are themain fossils neously considered his unit to he older. Alexander Brongniart rmrrelatingmarine deposits. Pangea supercontinent began to break (1829) coined the term "Terrains Jurassiques" when correlat- h md at the end of the Middle Jurassic the Central Atlantic was ing the "Jura Kalkstein" to the Lower Oolite Series (now as- m. Organic-rich sediments in several locations eventually became signed to Middle Jurassic) of the British succession. Leopold t source rocks helping to fuel modern civilization. von Buch (1839) established a three-fold subdivision for the Jurassic. The basic framework of von Buch has been retained as the three Jurassic series, although the nomenclature has var- 8.1 HISTORY AND SUBDIVISIONS ied (Black-Brown-White, Lias-Dogger-Malm, and currently L1.1 Overview of the Jurassic Lower-Middle-Upper). The immense wealth of fossils, particularly ammonites, in hc term "Jura Kalkstein" was applied by Alexander von the Jurassic strata of Britain, France, German5 and Switzer- bmholdt (1799) to a series ofcarhonate shelfdeposits exposed land was a magnet for innovative geologists, and modern con- the mountainous Jura region of northernmost Switzerland, cepts of hiostratigraphy, chronostratigraphy, correlation, and d he first recognized that these strata were distinct from paleogeography grew out of their studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Contrasting Phanerozoic Orogenic Systems Revealed by Hafnium Isotope Data William J
    ARTICLES PUBLISHED ONLINE: 17 APRIL 2011 | DOI: 10.1038/NGEO1127 Two contrasting Phanerozoic orogenic systems revealed by hafnium isotope data William J. Collins1*(, Elena A. Belousova2, Anthony I. S. Kemp1 and J. Brendan Murphy3 Two fundamentally different orogenic systems have existed on Earth throughout the Phanerozoic. Circum-Pacific accretionary orogens are the external orogenic system formed around the Pacific rim, where oceanic lithosphere semicontinuously subducts beneath continental lithosphere. In contrast, the internal orogenic system is found in Europe and Asia as the collage of collisional mountain belts, formed during the collision between continental crustal fragments. External orogenic systems form at the boundary of large underlying mantle convection cells, whereas internal orogens form within one supercell. Here we present a compilation of hafnium isotope data from zircon minerals collected from orogens worldwide. We find that the range of hafnium isotope signatures for the external orogenic system narrows and trends towards more radiogenic compositions since 550 Myr ago. By contrast, the range of signatures from the internal orogenic system broadens since 550 Myr ago. We suggest that for the external system, the lower crust and lithospheric mantle beneath the overriding continent is removed during subduction and replaced by newly formed crust, which generates the radiogenic hafnium signature when remelted. For the internal orogenic system, the lower crust and lithospheric mantle is instead eventually replaced by more continental lithosphere from a collided continental fragment. Our suggested model provides a simple basis for unravelling the global geodynamic evolution of the ancient Earth. resent-day orogens of contrasting character can be reduced to which probably began by the Early Ordovician12, and the Early two types on Earth, dominantly accretionary or dominantly Paleozoic accretionary orogens in the easternmost Altaids of Pcollisional, because only the latter are associated with Wilson Asia13.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change May Induce Connectivity Loss and Mountaintop Extinction in Central American Forests ✉ Lukas Baumbach 1 , Dan L
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-02359-9 OPEN Climate change may induce connectivity loss and mountaintop extinction in Central American forests ✉ Lukas Baumbach 1 , Dan L. Warren 2, Rasoul Yousefpour1 & Marc Hanewinkel 1 The tropical forests of Central America serve a pivotal role as biodiversity hotspots and provide ecosystem services securing human livelihood. However, climate change is expected to affect the species composition of forest ecosystems, lead to forest type transitions and trigger irrecoverable losses of habitat and biodiversity. Here, we investigate potential impacts of climate change on the environmental suitability of main plant functional types (PFTs) across Central America. Using a large database of occurrence records and physiological data, 1234567890():,; we classify tree species into trait-based groups and project their suitability under three representative concentration pathways (RCPs 2.6, 4.5 and 8.5) with an ensemble of state-of- the-art correlative modelling methods. Our results forecast transitions from wet towards generalist or dry forest PFTs for large parts of the study region. Moreover, suitable area for wet-adapted PFTs is projected to latitudinally diverge and lose connectivity, while expected upslope shifts of montane species point to high risks of mountaintop extinction. These findings underline the urgent need to safeguard the connectivity of habitats through biological corridors and extend protected areas in the identified transition hotspots. 1 Chair of Forestry Economics and Forest Planning,
    [Show full text]
  • (1987): "Tectonomagmatic Evolution of Cenozoic Extension in the North American Cordillera"
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by Frances J Cooper on January 21, 2013 Geological Society, London, Special Publications Tectonomagmatic evolution of Cenozoic extension in the North American Cordillera Brian P. Wernicke, Philip C. England, Leslie J. Sonder and Robert L. Christiansen Geological Society, London, Special Publications 1987, v.28; p203-221. doi: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1987.028.01.15 Email alerting click here to receive free e-mail alerts when service new articles cite this article Permission click here to seek permission to re-use all or request part of this article Subscribe click here to subscribe to Geological Society, London, Special Publications or the Lyell Collection Notes © The Geological Society of London 2013 Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by Frances J Cooper on January 21, 2013 Tectonomagmatic evolution of Cenozoic extension in the North American Cordillera B.P. Wernicke, R.L. Christiansen, P.C. England & L.J. Sonder SUMMARY: The spatial and temporal distributions of Cenozoic extension and magmatism in the Cordillera suggest that the onset of major crustal extension at a particular latitude was confined to a relatively narrow belt (< 100 km, pre-extension) and followed the onset of intermediate and silicic magmatism by no more than a few million years. Extension began in early Eocene time in southern British Columbia, northern Washington, Idaho and Montana. Farther S, extension began at about the Eocene- Oligocene boundary in the Great Basin and slightly later in the Mojave-Sonora Desert region. The intervening area, at the latitude of Las Vegas, remained quiescent until mid- Miocene time. Compositional and isotopic characteristics of most pre-Miocene magmas are consistent with their containing major components of melted continental crust.
    [Show full text]
  • Interest and the Panamint Shoshone (E.G., Voegelin 1938; Zigmond 1938; and Kelly 1934)
    109 VyI. NOTES ON BOUNDARIES AND CULTURE OF THE PANAMINT SHOSHONE AND OWENS VALLEY PAIUTE * Gordon L. Grosscup Boundary of the Panamint The Panamint Shoshone, also referred to as the Panamint, Koso (Coso) and Shoshone of eastern California, lived in that portion of the Basin and Range Province which extends from the Sierra Nevadas on the west to the Amargosa Desert of eastern Nevada on the east, and from Owens Valley and Fish Lake Valley in the north to an ill- defined boundary in the south shared with Southern Paiute groups. These boundaries will be discussed below. Previous attempts to define the Panamint Shoshone boundary have been made by Kroeber (1925), Steward (1933, 1937, 1938, 1939 and 1941) and Driver (1937). Others, who have worked with some of the groups which border the Panamint Shoshone, have something to say about the common boundary between the group of their special interest and the Panamint Shoshone (e.g., Voegelin 1938; Zigmond 1938; and Kelly 1934). Kroeber (1925: 589-560) wrote: "The territory of the westernmost member of this group [the Shoshone], our Koso, who form as it were the head of a serpent that curves across the map for 1, 500 miles, is one of the largest of any Californian people. It was also perhaps the most thinly populated, and one of the least defined. If there were boundaries, they are not known. To the west the crest of the Sierra has been assumed as the limit of the Koso toward the Tubatulabal. On the north were the eastern Mono of Owens River.
    [Show full text]
  • Stuttgarter Beiträge Zur Naturkunde
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Stuttgarter Beiträge Naturkunde Serie B [Paläontologie] Jahr/Year: 1977 Band/Volume: 26_B Autor(en)/Author(s): Ziegler Bernhard Artikel/Article: The "White" (Upper) Jurassic in Southern Germany 1- 79 5T(J 71^^-7 © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde Herausgegeben vom Staatlichen Museum für Naturkunde in Stuttgart Serie B (Geologie und Paläontologie), Nr. 26 .,.wr-..^ns > Stuttgart 1977 APR 1 U 19/0 The "White" (Upper) Jurassic D in Southern Germany By Bernhard Ziegler, Stuttgart With 11 plates and 42 figures 1. Introduction The Upper part of the Jurassic sequence in southern Germany is named the "White Jurassic" due to the light colour of its rocks. It does not correspond exactly to the Upper Jurassic as defined by the International Colloquium on the Jurassic System in Luxembourg (1962), because the lower Oxfordian is included in the "Brown Jurassic", and because the upper Tithonian is missing. The White Jurassic covers more than 10 000 square kilometers between the upper Main river near Staffelstein in northern Bavaria and the Swiss border west of the lake of Konstanz. It builds up the Swabian and the Franconian Alb. Because the Upper Jurassic consists mainly of light limestones and calcareous marls which are more resistent to the erosion than the clays and marls of the underlying Brown (middle) Jurassic it forms a steep escarpment directed to the west and northwest. To the south the White Jurassic dips below the Tertiary beds of the Molasse trough.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief Overview of North American Cordilleran Geology by Cin-Ty Lee Topography Map of North America
    Brief overview of North American Cordilleran geology by Cin‐Ty Lee Note: make sure to take notes as I will talk or sketch on the board many things that are not presented explicitly in these slides Topography map of North America Topography map How does the NthNorth AiAmerican Cor dillera fit itinto a glbllobal contt?text? Dickinson 2004 P‐wave tomography: Seismic structure beneath western USA Burdick et al. 2008 Crustal provinces of North America (Laurentia) ‐Proterozoic and Archean terranes were already assembled by 1.6 Ga Hoffman, 1988 Crustal provinces in southwestern USA Hoffman, 1988 Bennett and DePaolo, 1987 Some examples of tectonic margins for your reference Dickinson and Snyder, 1978 1.1 Ga = Rodinia Super‐continent (Grenvillian age) Neo‐Proterozoic = Rodinia breaks up “western” margin of Laurentia represents a passive margin due to opening of the Panthalassan ocean 700‐400 Ma Western margin of Laurentia represents a passive margin Dickinson and Snyder, 1978 400‐250 Ma Passive margin is interrupted in Devonian times by the accretion of island arcs Antler and Sonoma orogenies Accretion of allochthonous terranes to the western margin of the NhNorth AiAmerican craton Antler/Sonoma orogenies result in the accretion of Paleozoic island arc terranes to western North America Permian Formation of Pangea “”“western” margin of NhNorth AiAmerica now didominate d by subduct ion zone 250‐50 Ma Subduction results in continued accretion of fringing island arcs and the generation of continental magmatic arcs Sierra Nevada batholith Sevier and
    [Show full text]
  • Death Valley National Park
    COMPLIMENTARY $3.95 2019/2020 YOUR COMPLETE GUIDE TO THE PARKS DEATH VALLEY NATIONAL PARK ACTIVITIES • SIGHTSEEING • DINING • LODGING TRAILS • HISTORY • MAPS • MORE OFFICIAL PARTNERS T:5.375” S:4.75” PLAN YOUR VISIT WELCOME S:7.375” In T:8.375” 1994, Death Valley National SO TASTY EVERYONE WILL WANT A BITE. Monument was expanded by 1.3 million FUN FACTS acres and redesignated a national park by the California Desert Protection Act. Established: Death Valley became a The largest national park below Alaska, national monument in 1933 and is famed this designation helped focus protection for being the hottest, lowest and driest on one the most iconic landscapes in the location in the country. The parched world. In 2018 nearly 1.7 million people landscape rises into snow-capped mountains and is home to the Timbisha visited the park, a new visitation record. Shoshone people. Death Valley is renowned for its colorful Land Area: The park’s 3.4 million acres and complex geology. Its extremes of stretch across two states, California and elevation support a great diversity of life Nevada. and provide a natural geologic museum. Highest Elevation: The top of This region is the ancestral homeland Telescope Peak is 11,049 feet high. The of the Timbisha Shoshone Tribe. The lowest is -282 feet at Badwater Basin. Timbisha established a life in concert Plants and Animals: Death Valley with nature. is home to 51 mammal species, 307 Ninety-three percent of the park is bird species, 36 reptile species, two designated wilderness, providing unique amphibian species and five fish species.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Valley Springs Geochemical Investigation Yucca Mountain Nuclear Repository, Inyo County Oversight-1998
    The HYDRODYNAMICS Group studies in mass and energy transport in the earth Death Valley Springs Geochemical Investigation Yucca Mountain Nuclear Repository, Inyo County Oversight-1998 Submitted to: Inyo County Planning Department: Yucca Mountain Repository Oversight Program March, 1999 Michael J. King, R.G., C.HG. John D. Bredehoeft, Ph.D., NAE The HYDRODYNAMICS Group 16711 76th Avenue West, Edmonds, WA 98026 Phone (425) 787-6728, Fax (425) 742-8493 Page 1 The Hydrodynamics Group DEATH VALLEY SPRINGS GEOCHMICAL INVESTIGATION YUCCA MOUNTAIN NUCLEAR WASTE REPOSITORY, INYO COUNTY OVERSIGHT-1998 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Yucca Mountain, Nevada is under study as the site of the only proposed high-level nuclear waste repository in the United States. The repository concept uses the philosophy of multiple barriers, both engineered and natural, each of which impedes the movement of radionuclides into the accessible environment. The proposed repository would be in the unsaturated zone in Tertiary tuffaceous rocks. The principal transporting mechanism for radionuclides is moving ground water. Underlying the repository is an extensive Lower Carbonate Aquifer known to be highly permeable. Inyo County, as an affected unit of local government under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act, as amended, is concerned with the connections between the Lower Carbonate Aquifer underlying Yucca Mountain and the carbonate sources of waters in Inyo County, especially the Death Valley region. This report is a summary of the investigations conducted by Inyo County’s consultants, the Hydrodynamics Group, during calendar year 1998. This report presents the results of The Hydrodynamics Group’s 1998 collection of water samples from 23 springs and 2 creeks in Death Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Valley Lower Carbonate Aquifer Monitoring Program- Wells Down Gradient of the Proposed Yucca Mountian Nuclear Waste Repository
    iU4 MOL.20080509.0010 DEATH VALLEY LOWER CARBONATE AQUIFER MONITORING PROGRAM- WELLS DOWN GRADIENT OF THE PROPOSED YUCCA MOUNTIAN NUCLEAR WASTE REPOSITORY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT DE-FC28-06RW12368 YEAR ONE PROJECT REPORT PREPARED BY INYO COUNTY YUCCA MOUNTAIN REPOSITORY ASSESSMENT OFFICE Inyo County completed Year One of U.S. Department of Energy Cooperative Agreement No. DE-FC28-06RW12368. This report presents the results of research conducted within this cooperative agreement in the context of Inyo County's Yucca Mountain oversight program goals and objectives. The Hydrodynamics Group, LLC prepared this report for Inyo County Yucca Mountain repository Assessment Office. The overall goal of Inyo County's Yucca Mountain research program is the evaluation of far-field issues related to potential transport, by ground water, of radionuclide into Inyo County, including Death Valley, and the evaluation of a connection between the Lower Carbonate Aquifer (LCA) and the biosphere. Data collected within the cooperative agreement is included in interpretive illustrations and discussions of the results of our analysis. The central element's of this Cooperative Agreement program was the drilling of exploratory wells, analysis of geochemical data, geophysical surveys, and geological mapping of the Southern Funeral Mountain Range. The culmination of this research was two numerical ground water models of the Southern Funeral Mountain Range and Yucca Mountain region demonstrating the potential of a hydraulic connection between the LCA and the major springs in the Furnace Creek area of Death Valley. 1.0 Introduction The focus of the investigations by the Hydrodynamics Group for Inyo County is to assemble the best possible data on the Paleozoic Carbonate Aquifer, and then to use that data to assess the likelihood of contaminant transport from the planned Yucca Mountain high-level nuclear waste repository to the biosphere in Inyo County.
    [Show full text]
  • NV EAS Plan Attachment 2-Operational Areas
    Nevada Emergency Alert System Plan Attachment 2. Nevada EAS Operational Areas ATTACHMENT 2 NEVADA EAS OPERATIONAL AREAS The Nevada EAS Operational Area is divided into three sections. Western Nevada/Eastern California . Southern Nevada/Inyo County, California . Eastern Nevada Jurisdictions within the Nevada EAS Operational Areas Western Nevada/Eastern Eastern Nevada Southern Nevada/Inyo County, California California Carson City Elko County Clark County Churchill County Eureka County Esmeralda County Douglas County Humboldt County Lincoln County Lyon County Lander County Nye County (southern) Mineral County White Pine County Inyo County (CA) Nye County (northern) San Bernardino County (CA) Pershing County Mohave County (AZ) Washoe County Storey County Alpine County (CA)* El Dorado County (CA)* Lassen County (CA) Modoc County (CA)* Mono County (CA) Placer County (CA)* Nevada EAS Operational Areas Plumas County (CA)* . Sierra County (CA)* 2 *Areas east of the Sierra Nevada crest. Italicized text refers to non-Nevada jurisdictions. Southern Inyo County, California covers the area from the village of Independence in the north to the south county line and includes the communities of Shoshone, Death Valley National Park and headquarters, Furnace Creek, Cartagom, Barlett, Stovepipe Wells, Panamint Springs, Keeler, Olancha, Little Lake, Lone Pine, and Lake Owens. The area north of Independence is in Attachment the Western Nevada/Eastern California Operational Area. No broadcast stations in the Northern Inyo County area are able to receive signals from Las Vegas or Reno broadcast stations. Local EAS activations can be made through the use of CAP EAS by originating officials or by going through the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services.
    [Show full text]