Florida Law Review Volume 70 | Issue 4 Article 1 Speech Narcissism Terri R. Day Danielle Weatherby Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr Part of the First Amendment Commons Recommended Citation Terri R. Day and Danielle Weatherby, Speech Narcissism, 70 Fla. L. Rev. 839 (). Available at: https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr/vol70/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UF Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida Law Review by an authorized editor of UF Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Day and Weatherby: Speech Narcissism SPEECH NARCISSISM Terri R. Day* and Danielle Weatherby** Abstract From its embryonic stage during the civil rights era to its modern-day presence on college campuses, the political correctness movement has undergone an extreme metamorphosis. In the university setting, it was originally intended to welcome diverse views by encouraging minority students to feel part of the learning environment and to contribute to the “marketplace of ideas.” Recently, however, as students more frequently demand trigger warnings and safe spaces in response to speech that they deem personally offensive, the use of political correctness measures on college campuses has had the unintended consequence of chilling speech. Contrary to longstanding First Amendment principles, college campuses are becoming environments in which the most vulnerable among the student population can exercise a “heckler’s veto,” silencing speech that is subjectively offensive to the most sensitive students. During the 2016 presidential election, Trump supporters praised his unfiltered campaign rhetoric and divisive Tweets while others condemned them, criticizing his unscripted approach as offensive in the name of politica l correctness.