DOCSLIB.ORG

Bringing STEM Experts Into Your Classroom a Teaching and Learning Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Bringing STEM Experts into Your Classroom A Teaching and Learning Guide Information and advice for primary schools, and scientists and engineers, wishing to develop a partnership to support primary science and technology Bringing STEM Experts into Your Classroom This Teaching and Learning Guide begins with an overview of some local programmes enabling upper primary pupils to interact with STEM practitioners from industry, academia and government. These programmes include Civil Engineers in Primary Schools (supported by the Institution of Civil Engineers), Science Expressions (supported by the Astra-Zeneca Science Teaching Trust, and W5), STEM Experts in Primary Schools (supported by the Primary Science Teaching Trust (PSTT), and Sentinus), Physical Scientists from the World Around Us (supported by the Royal Society of Chemistry, and the Institute of Physics in Ireland), Primary BioSciences and Primary Life Sciences (supported by the Wellcome Trust), Primary Food Sciences (in association with the Institute for Global Food Security at Queen’s University Belfast). The essential feature of these programmes is that they provide continuing interaction between a working scientist or engineer and a primary school teacher and pupils over a period of time leading to a specific outcome or event, and provide a foundation for pupils to make appropriate course and career decisions later. As each section of this Guide is self-contained, there is some repetition between sections The programmes described in this paper were supported by: the Institute for Global Food Security at Queen’s University Belfast, the Institute of Physics in Ireland, the Institution of Civil Engineers, the Primary Science Teaching Trust (formerly the Astra Zeneca Science Teaching Trust), the Royal Society of Chemistry, Sentinus, the School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences at Queen’s University Belfast, W5, and the Wellcome Trust. Bringing STEM Experts into Your Classroom Teaching and Learning Guide Contents 1. STEM Experts in Primary Schools and similar Programmes 4 A description of the STEM Experts in Primary Schools (STEPS) programme, and ideas for schools developing a similar programme. 2. School Project Summaries 8 Summaries of pupil projects carried out in STEM Experts in Primary Schools and similar programmes. 3. Investigations and Experiments 24 Ideas for science investigations and experiments which can be carried out by pupils under the guidance of teachers and scientists, with links to appropriate websites. Activity sheets are available on the STEPS area of the Sentinus website. 4. Who is a Scientist? Careers in the Sciences 26 Information (including links to appropriate websites) on how to find out more about courses, jobs and careers in the sciences and engineering. 5. Evaluation 28 Finding out how effective your programme is in helping pupils appreciate and understand the sciences and their applications. Sample ‘before and after’ pupil attitude questionnaires, and sample pupil and teacher evaluation questionnaires are available as appendices on the Sentinus website. 6. School / Expert Partnerships: Information for Teachers and their Schools 30 Ideas for developing school / scientist partnerships. Information and advice for teachers wishing to develop a partnership similar to STEPS with industrial, government or academic scientists and engineers. Identification of financial resources to support the development of science in their schools. Sample letters of introduction, sample press information, sample grant applications, and sample risk assessment forms are available as appendices on the Sentinus website. 7. School / Expert Partnerships: Information for Experts and their Organisations 33 Information and advice for companies, academic departments, and scientists and engineers wishing to develop a partnership with primary schools. 8. Developing your Project 35 Advice for pupils developing a project for public presentation. 9. Presenting your Project 36 Information for pupils presenting material to an audience outside their classroom. 3 Bringing STEM Experts into Your Classroom Teaching and Learning Guide 1. STEM Experts in Primary Schools and similar Programmes Bringing STEM Experts into your Classroom is based on a number of programmes designed to support primary science and technology, managed by Martin Brown, Colin Press and Peter McAlister, over the past thirteen years. Most of these featured a scientist or engineer (the expert) working with a single primary school. These programmes include: - 2006 – 09: Civil Engineers in Primary Schools (supported by the Institution of Civil Engineers) - 2007 – 08: Science Expressions (in association with W5, supported by the AstraZeneca Science Teaching Trust) - 2009 – 16: STEM Experts in Primary Schools (STEPS) (supported by the Primary Science Teaching Trust (PSTT), Sentinus, and the Institute of Physics in Ireland) - 2013 – 16: Primary BioSciences / Primary Life Sciences (supported by the Wellcome Trust, and the Institute for Global Food Security at Queen’s University Belfast) - 2014 – 16: Chemists in Primary Schools (supported by the Royal Society of Chemistry) - 2015 – 18: Primary Food Science (developed in association with the Institute for Global Food Security at Queen’s University Belfast) - 2017 – 19: Physical Scientists from the World Around Us (supported by the Royal Society of Chemistry, and the Institute of Physics in Ireland) See below for outlines of these programmes, and Section 2 of this Guide for school project summaries. Science is no longer a discrete subject within the Northern Ireland primary curriculum: with history, geography and technology, it is part of the area of learning The World Around Us. In this context, Martin Brown, Colin Press, Peter McAlister and Lisa Connolly have managed a range of programmes designed to support the development of science and technology for upper primary pupils. Medium term programmes like these enhance their impact through the continuing interaction of the participating scientist or engineer with primary pupils during an extended period, leading to a specific outcome or event. STEM Experts in Primary Schools (STEPS), supported by the Primary Science Teaching Trust, is a programme to help schools achieve the aims of the Northern Ireland Curriculum at Key Stage 2 by developing pupils’ capabilities related to employment and economic awareness in the science and technology areas of The World Around Us. STEM Experts are people in an industrial or academic context working in research and development applications of science, technology, engineering and mathematics, who give time to support primary school science and technology and act as inspiring role models to young people. Nearly two thousand pupils in thirty primary schools have participated during the last eight years. Physical Scientists from the World Around Us operates with the support of the Royal Society of Chemistry and the Institute of Physics in Ireland. This programme runs along similar lines to STEPS, in which industrial and academic physical scientists work with primary schools to develop pupils’ understanding of chemistry and physics and their applications in the world around us. In these programmes, after initial training, STEM Experts visit primary schools initially for a morning with a Key Stage 2 (upper primary) class. Based on their own experience, they demonstrate how they apply science and technology to their everyday work in industry, government or research, and how this relates to science and technology in school, and to potential STEM careers. They run practical investigations in a science and technology theme related to their work. The Experts then, in discussion with teachers, pupils and programme management identify an appropriate theme for each school, and ask pupils and teacher to specify a related school project, which can be developed over a two to three month period, for example in chemistry and pharmaceuticals, neuroscience applied to thinking and learning, or bioengineering. They help pupils identify and find the resources required, keeping in touch with them by visits, email or telephone as their project develops. The programme culminates in pupil presentations of their projects at a Celebration Event in a university or similar setting later in the year. 4 Primary BioSciences and Primary Food Science, managed in association with Lisa Connolly at the Institute for Global Food Security at Queen’s University Belfast and supported by the Wellcome Trust, are programmes to help primary schools achieve relevant aims of the Northern Ireland Curriculum at Key Stage 2, by developing pupils’ skills and capabilities specifically in the areas of the biosciences, and food safety and security. The main aim of Primary Food Science is for food scientists to help primary teachers and pupils to develop their knowledge, understanding and appreciation of food science and nutrition in the outside world, and the extent to which food science applications can personally affect them and their families. The scientists act as role models to pupils, and help them identify potential careers in food science and technology. The programme identifies areas in food science appropriate for investigation by upper primary pupils. Teachers, pupils and their associated scientists work together to develop teaching and learning resources in themes related to food science and technology. Primary Food Science also develops the communication skills of participating scientists in presenting and explaining
Recommended publications
  • The Story of a Rising Race

    The Story of a Rising Race

    This is a reproduction of a library book that was digitized by Google as part of an ongoing effort to preserve the information in books and make it universally accessible. https://books.google.com Thestoryofarisingrace JamesJeffersonPipkin COUNCIIA.W.H. SOMENOTEDEDUCATORSOFRACE.THECOLORED T.WASHINGTON.BOOKER WESLHYHOFFMAN.JOHN THE STORY OF A RISING RACE THE NEGRO IN REVELATION, IN HISTORY AND IN CITIZENSHIP WHAT THE RACE HAS DONE AND IS DOING ARMS, ARTS, LETTERS, THE PULPIT, THE FORUM, THE SCHOOL, THE MARTS OF TRADE WITH THOSE MIGHTY WEAPONS IN THE BATTLE OF LIFE THE SHOVEL AND THE HOE A MESSAGE TO ALL MEN THAT HE IS IN THE WAY TO SOLVE THE RACE PROBLEM EOR HIMSELF REV. J . J . WPKIK WITH INTRODUCTION BY GEN. JOHN B. GORDON Former Major-General Confederate Army, United States Senator from Georgia. Ex-Commander United Confederate Veterans, Author "War Reminiscences," Etc. ^ CatJogua Proe. (JOPYHTUHT, 1902, BY N. ]).THOMP»ON PUBLISHING OOMPAN V NOT A TERM OF REPROACH. Supposing that this term (negro) was originally used as a phrase of contempt, is it not wilh us to elevate it? How often has it not happened that names originally given in reproach have been afterward adopted as a title of honor by those against whom they were used, as Methodists, Quakers, etc. t But as a proof that no unfavorable signification attached to the word when first employed, I may mention that long before the slave trade began travelers found the blacks on the coast of Africa preferring to be called Negroes. And in all the pre- slave trade literature the word was spelled with a capital N.
  • Stem Strategy

    Stem Strategy

    SUCCESS THROUGH STEM STEM STRATEGY In response to the ‘Report of the STEM Review’ HELPING TO EMPOWER FUTURE GENERATIONS THROUGH SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING AND MATHEMATICS TO GROW A DYNAMIC, INNOVATIVE ECONOMY 2011 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 4 2. CONTEXT 5 3. THE ROLE OF THE DEMAND SIDE 8 4. THE ROLE OF THE SUPPLY SIDE 10 5. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACTION 15 6. STRUCTURES FOR IMPLEMENTATION 23 7. CONCLUSION AND PRIORITY ACTIONS 25 ANNEX A – Existing Government STEM Activity ANNEX B – Government STEM Action Plan 1. INTRODUCTION Commissioned by the Department for Employment The Report contains 20 recommendations grouped and Learning (DEL) and the Department of Education under four ‘imperatives’. (DE), the review of Science, Technology, Engineering • Imperative 1 - Business must take the lead and Mathematics (STEM) commenced formally on in promoting STEM. 29 June 2007. Chaired by Dr Hugh Cormican, founder and former Chief Executive of Andor Technologies • Imperative 2 - The key constraints in the STEM Ltd., the steering group comprised representatives artery must be alleviated. from business, government and academia and the Programme Manager for the review was Dr Alan Blair, • Imperative 3 - There needs to be increased from the Association of NI Colleges (now Colleges NI). flexibility in the provision of STEM education. Three working groups reported to the steering group, • Imperative 4 - Government must better each of which was responsible for taking forward a coordinate its support for STEM. key strand of the Review. These working groups ensured This STEM Strategy forms Government’s response a focus on the respective roles of business, education, to the ‘Report of the STEM Review’.
  • Jeremy Farrar

    Jeremy Farrar

    FEATURE The BMJ THE BMJ INTERVIEW BMJ: first published as 10.1136/bmj.n459 on 19 February 2021. Downloaded from [email protected] Cite this as: BMJ 2021;372:n459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n459 Jeremy Farrar: Make vaccine available to other countries as soon as Published: 19 February 2021 our most vulnerable people have received it The SAGE adviser and Wellcome Trust director tells Mun-Keat Looi how the UK government acted too slowly against the pandemic, about the perils of vaccine nationalism, and why he is bullish about controlling covid variants Mun-Keat Looi international features editor “Once the UK has vaccinated our most vulnerable among healthcare workers. We had no human communities and healthcare workers we should make immunity, no diagnostics, no treatment, and no vaccines available to other countries,” insists the vaccines. infectious disease expert Jeremy Farrar. This could Every country should have acted then. Singapore, avert further public health and economic disaster, China, and South Korea did. Yet most of Europe and he says, describing it as “enlightened self-interest, North America waited until the middle of March, and as well as the right ethical thing to do.” that defined the first wave. Countries including the In April 2020, soon after the first UK lockdown began, UK were unwilling to act early, before they felt Farrar predicted that the UK would have one of the comfortable; were unwilling to go deeper than they worst covid-19 death rates in Europe. As a member thought they had to; and were unwilling to keep of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies restrictions in place for as long as was needed.
  • Women in Engineering Fixing the Talent Pipeline

    Women in Engineering Fixing the Talent Pipeline

    REPORT WOMEN IN ENGINEERING FIXING THE TALENT PIPELINE Amna Silim and Cait Crosse September 2014 © IPPR 2014 Institute for Public Policy Research ABOUT IPPR IPPR, the Institute for Public Policy Research, is the UK’s leading progressive thinktank. We are an independent charitable organisation with more than 40 staff members, paid interns and visiting fellows. Our main office is in London, with IPPR North, IPPR’s dedicated thinktank for the North of England, operating out of offices in Newcastle and Manchester. The purpose of our work is to conduct and publish the results of research into and promote public education in the economic, social and political sciences, and in science and technology, including the effect of moral, social, political and scientific factors on public policy and on the living standards of all sections of the community. IPPR 4th Floor 14 Buckingham Street London WC2N 6DF T: +44 (0)20 7470 6100 E: [email protected] www.ippr.org Registered charity no. 800065 This paper was first published in September 2014. © 2014 The contents and opinions in this paper are the authors’ only. NEW IDEAS for CHANGE CONTENTS Summary ............................................................................................................1 Introduction: Why should we care about the lack of women in engineering? .....2 1. The scale of the challenge in the UK .............................................................3 2. The choices girls make in education ..............................................................5 2.1 Choices at school ............................................................................................ 5 2.2 Choices in higher education ............................................................................. 6 2.3 Choices in employment.................................................................................... 7 3. Why do girls reject the idea of a career in engineering?..............................10 3.1 Perception of STEM subjects and engineering careers ..................................
  • Committee for Education Minutes of Proceedings 3

    Committee for Education Minutes of Proceedings 3

    Northern Ireland Assembly COMMITTEE FOR EDUCATION Minutes of Proceedings WEDNESDAY 3 March 2021 Video Conference Present by Video Conference: Mr Chris Lyttle MLA (Chairperson) Mr Pat Sheehan MLA (Deputy Chairperson) Mr Maurice Bradley MLA Ms Nicola Brogan MLA Mr Robbie Butler MLA Mr William Humphrey MBE MLA Mr Daniel McCrossan MLA Mr Justin McNulty MLA Mr Robin Newton MBE MLA Apologies: None In Attendance: Ms Aoibhinn Treanor (Assembly Clerk) Mr Mark McQuade (Assistant Clerk) Mr Craig Mealey (Clerical Supervisor) Ms Emma Magee (Clerical Officer) The meeting commenced at 9:04 am in public session. 1. Apologies There were no apologies. 2. Chairperson’s Business 2.1 General Teaching Council for Northern Ireland (GTCNI) The Chairperson reminded members that the Committee agreed to arrange oral briefings with the Department of Education and the General Teaching Council NI on its role, legal vires and stakeholder concerns at its meeting on Wednesday 24 March 2021. Agreed: The Committee agreed to be briefed informally by the Northern Ireland Teachers Council (NITC) on their concerns about GTCNI on 9 March 2021. 2.2 Tabled items The Committee noted correspondence from the Department in regard to school restart and exams; covid-19 vulnerable children plan benchmarking, vaccination and pandemic learning; the recruitment arrangements for a chairperson, vice- chairperson and panel member of the imminent New Decade New Approach Review of Education, which are unregulated appointments; and notification of the termination of the Transformation programme; for discussion with the Minister on 10 March. 2.3 Recent announcements The Chairperson informed members of the publication of the Department’s Emotional Health and Wellbeing Framework and of the Teachers’ Pay settlement.
  • Evidence Synthesis on the EU-UK Relationship on Research and Innovation January 2018

    Evidence Synthesis on the EU-UK Relationship on Research and Innovation January 2018

    Evidence synthesis on the EU-UK relationship on research and innovation January 2018 1. Introduction The Royal Society and the Wellcome Trust have undertaken a rapid evidence synthesis on the EU-UK research and innovation relationship as part of their Future Partnership Project. Organisations and individuals were invited to submit evidence and analyses for inclusion. Evidence was also gathered through internet searches to ensure an inclusive approach. The Annex is a summary of the methods. Two questions were used in gathering evidence and in determining the material in scope: 1. What incentives, infrastructure and mechanisms can be accessed by research and innovation organisations, funders and individuals in Member States to support collaborations? 2. How do Member States currently use and benefit from these and how might they be affected by Brexit? This paper is a synthesis of the evidence and covers funding, infrastructures, mobility, collaboration and regulation, with a focus on links between the EU and the UK. 2. Overview of the evidence base A few major reports were of particular relevance; the Royal Society’s three reports on the role of the EU in UK research and innovation and two reports commissioned from Technopolis Group by UK organisations, on the role of EU funding in UK research and innovation and the impact of collaboration: the value of UK medical research to EU science and health1,2. These documents were often referenced in other submissions. A report from the Lords Science and Technology Committee’s inquiry on EU Membership and UK Science also summarises many sources of evidence relevant to this synthesis.
  • Public Attitudes to Science 2011: Literature Review

    Public Attitudes to Science 2011: Literature Review

    Contents Introduction .....................................................................................1 Key Findings....................................................................................2 1. Defining the Sciences ........................................................................ 2 2. Levels of Understanding of the Sciences ........................................... 3 3. Engagement with the Sciences .......................................................... 4 4. Trust in the Sciences.......................................................................... 5 5. The Place of the Sciences in Society ................................................. 7 6. Attitudes towards Specific Scientific Issues...................................... 10 7. Attitudes by Demographic Group ..................................................... 15 8. Conclusions...................................................................................... 18 Appendices ....................................................................................19 Appendix A: Inclusion Criteria .................................................................. 19 Appendix B: Review Pro Forma ............................................................... 20 Appendix C: Index of Main Sources......................................................... 21 References.....................................................................................23 Public Attitudes to Science 2011: Literature Review Introduction This report presents the findings of a literature
  • Janet Thornton / 19 July 2018

    Janet Thornton / 19 July 2018

    Oral History: Janet Thornton / 19 July 2018 DISCLAIMER The information contained in this transcript is a textual representation of the recoded interview which took place on 2018-07-19 as part of the Oral Histories programme of the EMBL Archive. It is an unedited, verbatim transcript of this recorded interview. This transcript is made available by the EMBL Archive for free reuse for research and personal purposes, providing they are suitably referenced. Please contact the EMBL Archive ([email protected]) for further information and if you are interested in using material for publication purposes. Some information contained herein may be work product of the interviewee and/or private conversation among participants. The views expressed herein are solely those of the interviewee in his private capacity and do not necessary reflect the views of the EMBL. EMBL reserves the right not to be responsible for the topicality, accuracy, completeness or quality of the information provided. Liability claims regarding damage caused by the use of any information provided, including any kind of information which is incomplete or incorrect, will therefore be rejected. 2 2018_07_19_JanetThornton Key MG: Mark Green, former head of Administration at EMBL-EBI JT: Participant, Janet Thornton, former Director of EMBL-EBI and current EMBL-EBI Research Group Leader [??? At XX:XX] = inaudible word or section at this time MG: My name is Mark Green. This is Thursday 19th July 2018 and I’m in the Pompeian Room in Hinxton Hall on the Wellcome Genome Campus where EMBL-EBI is based and I’m about to do an interview as part of the oral histories programme of the EMBL Archive, with Janet Thornton, and I’d just like to ask Janet to introduce herself and to say a bit about her life before EMBL.
  • Inside Science

    Inside Science

    SPRING 2009 NEWS FROM THE ROYAL SOCIETY INSIDE SCIENCE YOUNG EXPLORERS TOUCHDOWN IN NEW ZEALAND International Expedition Prize is a ‘once in a lifetime experience’ SCIENCE TAKES TO THE STAGE The Royal Shakespeare Company premiers a new play on the emergence of modern science UPDATE FROM THE ROYAL SOCIETY This third issue of Inside Science contains early information DID YOU KNOW? about exciting plans for the Royal Society’s 350th Anniversary in 2010. The Anniversary is a marvellous STEADY FOOTING, opportunity to increase the profile of science, explore its SHAKY BRIDGE benefits and address the challenges it presents for society On its opening day, crowds of but perhaps most important of all to inspire young minds pedestrians experienced unexpected with the excitement of scientific discovery. swaying as they walked across London’s Our policy work continues to address major scientific issues Millennium Bridge. Whilst pedestrians affecting the UK. In December we cautioned the Government on fondly nicknamed it the ‘wobbly bridge’, the levels of separated plutonium stockpiled in the UK – currently physicists were busy exploring the the highest in the world. With support from our Plutonium Working Group, the Society has reasons for the phenomenon. submitted detailed comment to the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) for a report to The view was widely held that the Government on management options for the stockpile. ‘wobble’ was due to crowd loading and Late last year we ran an extremely successful MP-Scientist pairing scheme, helping to build pedestrians synchronising their footsteps bridges between parliamentarians and some of the best young scientists in the UK.
  • Royal Society, 1985

    Royal Society, 1985

    The Public Understanding of Science Report of a Royal Society adhoc Group endorsed by the Council of the Royal Society The Royal Society 6 Carlton House Terrace London SWlY 5AG CONTENTS Page Preface 5 Summary 6 1. Introduction 7 2. Why it matters 9 3. The present position 12 4. Formal education 17 5. The mass media 2 1 6. ' The scientific community 24 7. Public lectures, children's activities, museums and libraries 27 8. Industry 29 9. Conclusions and recommendations 31 Annexes A. List of those submitting evidence B. Visits and seminars C. Selected bibliography PREFACE This report was prepared by an ad hoc group under the chairmanship of Dr W.F. Bodmer, F.R.S.; it has been endorsed by the Council of the Royal Society. It deals with an issue that is important not only, or even mainly, for the scientific community but also for the nation as a whole and for each individual within it. More than ever, people need some understanding of science, whether they are involved in decision-making at a national or local level, in managing industrial companies, in skilled or semi-skilled employment, in voting as private citizens or in making a wide range of personal decisions. In publishing this report the Council hopes that it will highlight this need for an overall awareness of the nature of science and, more particularly, of the way that science and technology pervade modern life, and that it will generate both debate and decisions on how best they can be fostered. The report makes a number of recommendations.
  • Department of Physics Review

    Department of Physics Review

    The Blackett Laboratory Department of Physics Review Faculty of Natural Sciences 2008/09 Contents Preface from the Head of Department 2 Undergraduate Teaching 54 Academic Staff group photograph 9 Postgraduate Studies 59 General Departmental Information 10 PhD degrees awarded (by research group) 61 Research Groups 11 Research Grants Grants obtained by research group 64 Astrophysics 12 Technical Development, Intellectual Property 69 and Commercial Interactions (by research group) Condensed Matter Theory 17 Academic Staff 72 Experimental Solid State 20 Administrative and Support Staff 76 High Energy Physics 25 Optics - Laser Consortium 30 Optics - Photonics 33 Optics - Quantum Optics and Laser Science 41 Plasma Physics 38 Space and Atmospheric Physics 45 Theoretical Physics 49 Front cover: Laser probing images of jet propagating in ambient plasma and a density map from a 3D simulation of a nested, stainless steel, wire array experiment - see Plamsa Physics group page 38. 1 Preface from the Heads of Department During 2008 much of the headline were invited by, Ian Pearson MP, the within the IOP Juno code of practice grabbing news focused on ‘big science’ Minister of State for Science and (available to download at with serious financial problems at the Innovation, to initiate a broad ranging www.ioppublishing.com/activity/diver Science and Technology Facilities review of physics research under sity/Gender/Juno_code_of_practice/ Council (STFC) (we note that some the chairmanship of Professor Bill page_31619.html). As noted in the 40% of the Department’s research Wakeham (Vice-Chancellor of IOP document, “The code … sets expenditure is STFC derived) and Southampton University). The stated out practical ideas for actions that the start-up of the Large Hadron purpose of the review was to examine departments can take to address the Collider at CERN.
  • Annual Report 2017-2018

    Annual Report 2017-2018

    Victoria College Belfast Cranmore Park Belfast BT9 6JA Tel No:(028) 90661506 Fax No:(028) 90666898 ANNUAL REPORT TO PARENTS For the Year 2017 / 2018 VICTORIA COLLEGE BELFAST CRANMORE PARK BELFAST BT9 6JA TEL: 028 90661506 FAX: 028 90666898 GOVERNORS' ANNUAL REPORT SECTION 1 – BOARD OF GOVERNORS The Board of Victoria College, under its current constitution, comprises of 27 Governors. Of these, twelve are Foundation Governors; nine are nominated by the Department of Education; three are Parent Governors elected by parents; and three are Teacher Governors elected by their colleagues. The Principal is an ex officio member of the Board. The Board’s Secretary is Ms Nicola Mawhinney BA. The members of the Board of Governors who served during the period 2017 – 2018 were as follows: Expiry of Name Category Term of Office Dr B J Gregory BSc PhD CEng MICE MIEI FCIWM Foundation Governor N/A (Chairman - until 11.06.18) Mrs W Blundell OBE MEng CEng FICE MIStructE Foundation Governor N/A (appointed Chairman from 11.06.18) Mrs G Wells MB BCh BAO MRCGP MFCH Foundation Governor N/A (Vice Chairman) Mrs P Slevin BA MEd PGCE PQH (Headmistress) Ex officio N/A Dr B Callender MB BCh BAO MRCGP Foundation Governor N/A Dr R Clarke MB BCh BAO FRCPath Foundation Governor N/A Mrs O Dagunduro Dept of Education Nominee Aug 2019 Mrs A Doran BA BA MSc CIA PGDip PGDip1 Parent Governor Nov 2021 Mr L Gorman BEd Teacher Governor Nov 2021 Dame Joan Harbison BA MSc Foundation Governor N/A Mr M Haylett BEng CEng PMP MICE MAPM RMaPS Co-opted Member N/A Ms S Hetherington CPFA