Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 75/Wednesday, April 21, 2021/Notices

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 75/Wednesday, April 21, 2021/Notices 20784 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 21, 2021 / Notices OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION West Building Ground Floor at 1200 TRADE REPRESENTATIVE New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, Federal Aviation Administration DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday Notice with Respect to List of [Summary Notice No. PE–2021–2068] through Friday, except Federal holidays. Countries Denying Fair Market FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Opportunities for Government-Funded Petition for Exemption; Summary of Deana Stedman, AIR–612, Federal Airport Construction Projects Petition Received; Airlines for America Aviation Administration, 2200 South 216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198, AGENCY: Office of the United States AGENCY: Federal Aviation phone and fax 206–231–3187, email Trade Representative. Administration (FAA), DOT. [email protected]. ACTION: Notice of petition for exemption This notice is published pursuant to ACTION: Notice. received. 14 CFR 11.85. Issued in Washington, DC, on April 16, SUMMARY: The U.S. Trade SUMMARY: This notice contains a 2021. Representative has determined not to summary of a petition seeking relief Daniel J. Elgas, list any countries as denying fair market from specified requirements of Federal opportunities for U.S. products, Aviation Regulations. The purpose of Manager, Strategic Policy Management this notice is to improve the public’s Branch,Policy and Innovation Division, suppliers, or bidders in foreign Aircraft Certification Service. government-funded airport construction awareness of, and participation in, the projects. FAA’s exemption process. Neither Petition for Exemption publication of this notice nor the Docket No.: FAA–2020–0429 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate inclusion or omission of information in Petitioner: Airlines for America Psillos, International Procurement the summary is intended to affect the Section(s) of 14 CFR Affected: Negotiator, Kathryn.W.Psillos@ legal status of the petition or its final §§ 91.9(a) and (b), 121.153(a), ustr.eop.gov or 202–395–9581, or disposition. 121.337(b)(9)(iii) Edward Marcus, Assistant General DATES: Comments on this petition must Description of Relief Sought: Airlines Counsel, Edward.D.Marcus@ identify the petition docket number and for America petitions for a one-year ustr.eop.gov or 202–395–0448. must be received on or before May 11, extension of FAA Exemption No. 18561A that is set to terminate on July SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 2021. 10, 2021. That exemption permits relief 533 of the Airport and Airway ADDRESSES: Send comments identified from 14 CFR 91.9(a) and 121.153(a)(2) by docket number FAA–2020–0429 Improvement Act of 1982, as amended and allows member airlines to transport by section 115 of the Airport and using any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to cargo, subject to the FAA’s conditions, Airway Safety and Capacity Expansion on passenger seats of transport category Act of 1987, Public Law 100–223 http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your airplanes when no revenue passengers (codified at 49 U.S.C. 50104), requires are being transported. Due to the the U.S. Trade Representative to decide comments electronically. • Mail: Send comments to Docket ongoing reduction in demand, passenger whether any foreign country has denied carriers continue to have the capacity to fair market opportunities to U.S. Operations, M–30; U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey carry cargo, including critical medical products, suppliers, or bidders in Avenue SE, Room W12–140, West cargo, in cabin. Approval of the petition connection with airport construction Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC would allow operators of passenger projects of $500,000 or more that are 20590–0001. airplanes to support COVID–19 funded in whole or in part by the • Hand Delivery or Courier: Take response efforts by continuing to carry government of such country. The Office comments to Docket Operations in cargo in-cabin, including critical of the United States Trade Room W12–140 of the West Building medical cargo. Representative has not received any Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey [FR Doc. 2021–08264 Filed 4–20–21; 8:45 am] complaints or other information Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 BILLING CODE 4910–13–P indicating that U.S. products, suppliers, a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through or bidders are being denied fair market Friday, except Federal holidays. opportunities in such airport • Fax: Fax comments to Docket DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION construction projects. As a consequence, Operations at 202–493–2251. Federal Aviation Administration the U.S. Trade Representative has Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. decided not to list any countries as 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the [Docket No. FAA–2020–0926] denying fair market opportunities for public to better inform its rulemaking U.S. products, suppliers, or bidders in process. DOT posts these comments, Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments; foreign government-funded airport without edit, including any personal Clearance of Clearance of a Renewed construction projects. information the commenter provides, to http://www.regulations.gov, as Approval of Information Collection: Nora Todd, described in the system of records Notice of Proposed Outdoor Laser Chief of Staff, Office of the United States notice (DOT/ALL–14 FDMS), which can Operation(s) Trade Representative. be reviewed at http://www.dot.gov/ AGENCY: Federal Aviation [FR Doc. 2021–08194 Filed 4–20–21; 8:45 am] privacy. Administration (FAA), DOT BILLING CODE 3290–F1–P Docket: Background documents or ACTION: Notice and request for comments received may be read at comments. http://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions for SUMMARY: In accordance with the accessing the docket or go to the Docket Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA Operations in Room W12–140 of the invites public comments about our VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:12 Apr 20, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00133 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM 21APN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 21, 2021 / Notices 20785 intention to request the Office of No laser light show, projection site of the non-directional beacon Management and Budget (OMB) system, or device may vary from located 10.2 nautical miles from the approval to renew an information compliance with 21 CFR 1040.11(c) in airport and was decommissioned and collection. The Federal Register Notice design or use without the approval of an removed from the site. The land is no with a 60-day comment period soliciting application for variance in accordance longer needed for aviation purposes and comments on the following collection of with 21 CFR 1010.4. Those applying for can be disposed without affecting future information was published on January an FDA variance (using and per FDA aviation needs of the airport. Ninety 29, 2021. The collection involves the Form 3147), must make advance written percent of the revenue generated by the gathering of information necessary for notification as early as possible to FAA disposal will be returned to the FAA FAA to ensure proposed outdoor laser for any projections into open airspace at and used for future airport grants. operations will not interfere with air any time. To notify FAA of a proposed DATES: Comments must be received on traffic operations. The information to be outdoor laser operation, proponents or before May 21, 2021. collected will be used by FAA to complete and submit FAA Form 7140– ADDRESSES: You may send comments evaluate proposed outdoor laser 1, Notice of Proposed Outdoor Laser using any of the following methods: operations (e.g., laser light show, Operation(s), to FAA. FAA Form 7140– • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to display, or device) requiring approval of 1 is the approved method for collecting http://www.regulations.gov, and follow a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) information required to process the instructions on providing variance. submissions from proponents intending comments. DATES: Written comments should be to project into open airspace. • Fax: 202–493–2251. submitted by May 21, 2021. FAA received one comment from two • Mail: U.S. Department of contributing authors. The comment Transportation, Docket Operations, M– ADDRESSES: Interested persons are supported past changes made to the invited to submit written comments on 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room technical aspects of FAA Form 7140–1 the proposed information collection to W 12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, and raised multiple points with the Office of Information and Regulatory Washington, DC 20590. suggestions to improve, notably: • Hand Delivery: Deliver to mail Affairs, Office of Management and Defining regulatory authority, when to address above between 9 a.m. and 5 Budget. Comments should be addressed submit a form, combining the form p.m., Monday through Friday, except to the attention of the Desk Officer, within another document, and clarifying Federal holidays. Department of Transportation/FAA, and language on the form. FAA appreciates Interested persons may inspect the sent via electronic mail to oira_ the time taken by the authors to request and supporting documents by [email protected], or faxed to comment, acknowledges the contacting the FAA at the address listed (202) 395–6974, or mailed to the Office suggestions, and intends to revise FAA under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Form 7140–1 to improve clarity. CONTACT. Office of Management and Budget, Respondents: Approximately 603 Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: Mr. laser operations. Street NW, Washington, DC 20503. Jorge E. Panteli, Compliance and Land Frequency: One time per laser Use Specialist, Federal Aviation FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: operation. Administration New England Region Brian Konie, Rules and Regulations Estimated Average Burden per Airports Division, 1200 District Avenue, Group, Office of Policy, by email at: Response: Approximately 240 minutes Burlington, Massachusetts 01803.
Recommended publications
  • IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 of 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report
    IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 OF 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report AGREEMENT : Standard PERIOD: P01 September 2021 MEMBER CODE MEMBER NAME ZONE STATUS CATEGORY XB-B72 "INTERAVIA" LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY B Live Associate Member FV-195 "ROSSIYA AIRLINES" JSC D Live IATA Airline 2I-681 21 AIR LLC C Live ACH XD-A39 617436 BC LTD DBA FREIGHTLINK EXPRESS C Live ACH 4O-837 ABC AEROLINEAS S.A. DE C.V. B Suspended Non-IATA Airline M3-549 ABSA - AEROLINHAS BRASILEIRAS S.A. C Live ACH XB-B11 ACCELYA AMERICA B Live Associate Member XB-B81 ACCELYA FRANCE S.A.S D Live Associate Member XB-B05 ACCELYA MIDDLE EAST FZE B Live Associate Member XB-B40 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS AMERICAS INC B Live Associate Member XB-B52 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS INDIA LTD. D Live Associate Member XB-B28 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B70 ACCELYA UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B86 ACCELYA WORLD, S.L.U D Live Associate Member 9B-450 ACCESRAIL AND PARTNER RAILWAYS D Live Associate Member XB-280 ACCOUNTING CENTRE OF CHINA AVIATION B Live Associate Member XB-M30 ACNA D Live Associate Member XB-B31 ADB SAFEGATE AIRPORT SYSTEMS UK LTD. A Live Associate Member JP-165 ADRIA AIRWAYS D.O.O. D Suspended Non-IATA Airline A3-390 AEGEAN AIRLINES S.A. D Live IATA Airline KH-687 AEKO KULA LLC C Live ACH EI-053 AER LINGUS LIMITED B Live IATA Airline XB-B74 AERCAP HOLDINGS NV B Live Associate Member 7T-144 AERO EXPRESS DEL ECUADOR - TRANS AM B Live Non-IATA Airline XB-B13 AERO INDUSTRIAL SALES COMPANY B Live Associate Member P5-845 AERO REPUBLICA S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Week & Space Technology
    STARTS AFTER PAGE 34 Using AI To Boost How Emirates Is Extending ATM Efficiency Maintenance Intervals ™ $14.95 JANUARY 13-26, 2020 2020 THE YEAR OF SUSTAINABILITY RICH MEDIA EXCLUSIVE Digital Edition Copyright Notice The content contained in this digital edition (“Digital Material”), as well as its selection and arrangement, is owned by Informa. and its affiliated companies, licensors, and suppliers, and is protected by their respective copyright, trademark and other proprietary rights. Upon payment of the subscription price, if applicable, you are hereby authorized to view, download, copy, and print Digital Material solely for your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that by doing any of the foregoing, you acknowledge that (i) you do not and will not acquire any ownership rights of any kind in the Digital Material or any portion thereof, (ii) you must preserve all copyright and other proprietary notices included in any downloaded Digital Material, and (iii) you must comply in all respects with the use restrictions set forth below and in the Informa Privacy Policy and the Informa Terms of Use (the “Use Restrictions”), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Any use not in accordance with, and any failure to comply fully with, the Use Restrictions is expressly prohibited by law, and may result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Violators will be prosecuted to the maximum possible extent. You may not modify, publish, license, transmit (including by way of email, facsimile or other electronic means), transfer, sell, reproduce (including by copying or posting on any network computer), create derivative works from, display, store, or in any way exploit, broadcast, disseminate or distribute, in any format or media of any kind, any of the Digital Material, in whole or in part, without the express prior written consent of Informa.
    [Show full text]
  • Information on Airline Fees for Optional Services
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters September 2017 COMMERCIAL AVIATION Information on Airline Fees for Optional Services GAO-17-756 September 2017 COMMERCIAL AVIATION Information on Airline Fees for Optional Services Highlights of GAO-17-756, a report to congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found Since 2008, U.S passenger airlines Since 2010, selected U.S. airlines have introduced a variety of new fees for have increasingly charged fees for optional services and increased some existing fees. For example, each of the 11 optional services that were previously U.S. airlines that GAO examined introduced fees for “preferred” seating, which included in the price of a ticket, such may include additional legroom or a seat closer to the front of the economy as checked baggage or seat selection. cabin. Some of these airlines have also introduced new fees for other optional Consumer advocates have raised services, such as fees for carry-on baggage and priority boarding. Since 2010, questions about the transparency of many of the selected airlines have also increased existing fees for some optional these fees and their associated rules. services, including fees for checked baggage and for changing or cancelling a In April 2011, DOT issued a final rule reservation. From 2010 to 2016, U.S. airlines’ revenues from these two fees— requiring, among other things, that the only optional service fees for which revenues are separately reported to the certain U.S. and foreign airlines disclose information about optional Department of Transportation (DOT)—increased from $6.3 billion in 2010 to $7.1 service fees on their websites.
    [Show full text]
  • ATIS01) for Discussion, Consensus, and Acceptance by the Industry
    ATPCO TRAVEL INDUSTRY STANDARD ATIS-01 The Standard for Standards An industry foundation for innovating at scale Version 1.0, 29 May 2020 atpco.net ATIS-01 | The Standard for Standards Published 29 May 2020 The information contained in this document is the property of ATPCO. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, or by any means; mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of ATPCO. Under the law, copying includes translating into another language or format. Legal action will be taken against any infringement Copyright © 2020 by ATPCO. All rights reserved. 2 29 May 2020 ATIS-01 | The Standard for Standards Contents About this document .................................................................................................................................. 4 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Document Scope ............................................................................................................................ 5 3. Terms and Definitions ................................................................................................................... 6 4. ATPCO’s Standards Approach ..................................................................................................... 9 4.1. The Purpose of Standards ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annex2: Glossary PDF 339Kb
    Global Report 2015 A business, financial and sustainability overview Annex 2_Glossary 142 Amadeus Global Report 2015 Annex 2_Glossary Annex 2_Glossary Amadeus Global Report 2015 143 Ancillary services: additional services provided CMMI: Capability Maturity Model Integration, a process A to customers beyond the ticket. Typical examples improvement training and appraisal programme used A4A: Airlines For America of airline ancillary services include extra baggage, to guide process improvement across a project, division priority seating, catering on board, etc. or an entire organisation. AACO: Arab Air Carrier Organisation APAC: Asia-Pacific CNMV: Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores, ACH: Airlines Clearing House API: Application Programming Interface, a language that the Spanish Securities Market Regulator. It is the agency ACO: Amadeus Commercial Organisation enables communication between computer programs. in charge of supervising and inspecting the Spanish Adjusted EPS (earnings per share): EPS corresponding stock markets and the activities of all the participants ASTA: American Society of Travel Agents to the adjusted profit for the year attributable to the in these markets. parent company. Calculated based on weighted average ATOC: Association of Train Operating Companies Code sharing: an aviation business arrangement outstanding shares less weighted average treasury where two or more airlines share the same flight, shares of the year. improving airlines’ network capacity and efficiency. Adjusted profit: the profit for the year adjusted
    [Show full text]
  • Loyalty Programs: the Vital Safety Feature for Airlines to Survive COVID-19
    The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at: https://www.emerald.com/insight/2516-8142.htm Airline loyalty Loyalty programs: the vital programs safety feature for airlines to survive COVID-19 Manuel E. Pascual Chaplin School of Hospitality and Tourism, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA, and Received 9 March 2021 Revised 13 April 2021 Lisa Nicole Cain Accepted 14 April 2021 Hospitality and Tourism Management, Florida International University Biscayne Bay Campus, North Miami, Florida, USA Abstract Purpose – The airline industry has been severely impacted by COVID-19 due to widespread travel restrictions. Its current response is crucial to ensure continued operations after the global pandemic is resolved. One resource the airlines are leveraging is loyalty programs. This study aims to examine the viability of leveraging loyalty programs in times of crisis. Design/methodology/approach – This study employs a case study methodology to examine how one company, American Airlines, has used its loyalty program to survive a pandemic and alleviate the financial costs associated with limited and restricted travel. Findings – American Airlines’ AAdvantage loyalty program structure may be used as a benchmark to understand how airlines can anchor their loyalty base to reinvigorate travel interest and use these programs as safeguards in critical instances that may arise in the future. Research limitations/implications – The case was bound by the fact that the pandemic was still a threat during the time of analysis. The findings of this case study go beyond the airline industry and may inform other hospitality and tourism organizations on the benefits of loyalty programs in times of financial distress.
    [Show full text]
  • Control of Air Pollution from Airplanes and Airplane Engines
    1 2 3 4 U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 5 6 PUBLIC HEARING 7 8 PROPOSAL - CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION FROM AIRPLANES AND 9 AIRPLANE ENGINES: GHG EMISSION STANDARDS AND TEST 10 PROCEDURES 11 12 [EPA-HQ-OAR-2018-0276] 13 14 15 VIRTUAL PUBLIC HEARING 16 17 18 Thursday, September 17, 2020 19 10:00 a.m. 20 21 22 1 1 PARTICIPANTS 2 EPA AND ABT STAFF: 3 BILL CHARMLEY, EPA Presiding Officer 4 BRYAN MANNING, EPA Panel 5 MIKE SAMULSKI, EPA Panel 6 MIKE THRIFT, EPA Panel 7 ROSEMARY HAMBRIGHT, EPA Panel 8 JEANNE GOODMAN, Abt Emcee and WebEx Events Manager 9 MELISSA SPIVEY, Abt Attendee and Speaker 10 Communications Support 11 HANNAH DERRICK, Abt Attendee and Speaker 12 Communications Support 13 FRANK DIVITA, Abt Slides and Speaker Scheduling 14 BARBARA BAUER, Abt General Support 15 DAVID STEVENS, Abt WebEx Technical Support and 16 Troubleshooting 17 DONNA JENKINS, Court Reporter 18 19 20 21 22 2 1 PARTICIPANTS 2 WITNESSES: 3 ZACHARY TOLAND, Environmental Defense Fund 4 RACHEL JONES, National Association of 5 Manufacturers 6 BOLAJI OLAGBEGI, Ceres 7 DAVID HYDE, Aerospace Industries Association 8 PETER PROWITT, GE Aviation 9 CHUCK CHAITOVITA, U.S. Chamber of Commerce 10 TINA ORWALL, Washington State House of 11 Representatives 12 NADIA SALIM, Private Citizen 13 MARY MINETTE, Mercy Investment Services 14 LIZ JONES, Center for Biological Diversity 15 TIMOTHY POHLE, Airlines for America 16 KATHI HURST, Air Line Pilots Association 17 KANNAN THIRUVENGADAM, Eastie Farm, Friends of 18 Belle Isle Marsh, and Air Inc. 19 CINDY BAXTER, Resident 20 DEBI WAGNER, Quiet Skies Coalition, Aviation 21 Justice 22 3 1 PARTICIPANTS 2 WITNESSES (Continued): 3 WIG ZAMORE, Somerville Transportation Equity 4 Partnership 5 BRIAN GANNON, Resident 6 SHEILA REMES, Boeing Commercial Airplanes 7 KENT PALOSAARI, Mira’s Garden 8 DAN RUTHERFORD, International Council on Clean 9 Transportation 10 TANYA HAHNEL, Resident 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 4 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 MS.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Week & Space Technology
    $14.95 JULY 27-AUGUST 16, 2020 FLIGHT PATHS FORWARD CLIMBING OUT OF COVID-19 CEO Interviews Airbus, Boeing and L3Harris U.S. Army’s FVL Plan A Heavy Lift for Industry Pandemic Tests Smallsat Industry Digital Edition Copyright Notice The content contained in this digital edition (“Digital Material”), as well as its selection and arrangement, is owned by Informa. and its affiliated companies, licensors, and suppliers, and is protected by their respective copyright, trademark and other proprietary rights. Upon payment of the subscription price, if applicable, you are hereby authorized to view, download, copy, and print Digital Material solely for your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that by doing any of the foregoing, you acknowledge that (i) you do not and will not acquire any ownership rights of any kind in the Digital Material or any portion thereof, (ii) you must preserve all copyright and other proprietary notices included in any downloaded Digital Material, and (iii) you must comply in all respects with the use restrictions set forth below and in the Informa Privacy Policy and the Informa Terms of Use (the “Use Restrictions”), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Any use not in accordance with, and any failure to comply fully with, the Use Restrictions is expressly prohibited by law, and may result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Violators will be prosecuted to the maximum possible extent. You may not modify, publish, license, transmit (including by way of email, facsimile or other electronic means), transfer, sell, reproduce (including by copying or posting on any network computer), create derivative works from, display, store, or in any way exploit, broadcast, disseminate or distribute, in any format or media of any kind, any of the Digital Material, in whole or in part, without the express prior written consent of Informa.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Optimal Airport Hubs
    Finding Optimal Airport Hubs Jackie Hudepohl Tiffany Zhu Karishma Desai Table of Contents Background 2 Assumptions 2 Data 3 Initial Model 5 Integer Program Formulation 6 Results with Constant Hub Costs 7 Results with Variable Hub Costs 8 Conclusion 9 References 10 1 Background Many airlines use airport hubs to concentrate passenger traffic and flight operations to a particular airport. Hubs often serve as layover points for passengers going to a final destination. An airline operates flight from non-hub cities to hub cities or through hub cities if the final destination is not a hub city. This model creates an economies of scale that allows airlines to fly between a city pair (through a hub) which would not have been economical if the flight were to be nonstop. It is useful for an airline to have a hub so that they can provide more flights that cater to their passengers’ needs and to maximize their revenue. Airlines incur many operating costs. Some of these costs include salaries, repairs, and maintenance. An airline deals with extra costs by having a hub airport. They have to hire more employees and facilities which increases costs. In this project, we wanted to find what the optimal number and location for an airline hub would be by minimizing the operating costs of the airline. The top twenty airports for flight frequency were used as candidates for optimal hub locations. This report includes two methods of solving this problem. The first method, using the hub-and-spokes model, is a simpler model and is done in Python using brute force.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2014 R&D Annual Review
    FY 2014 R&D Annual Review August 2015 Report of the Federal Aviation Administration to the United States Congress pursuant to Section 44501(c) of Title 49 of the United States Code FY 2014 R&D Annual Review August 2015 The R&D Annual Review is a companion document to the National Aviation Research Plan (NARP), a report of the Federal Aviation Administration to the United States Congress pursuant to Section 44501(c)(3) of Title 49 of the United States Code. The R&D Annual Review is available on the Internet at http://www.faa.gov/go/narp. FY 2014 R&D Annual Review Table of Contents Table of Contents Introduction ..............................................................................................................1 R&D Principle 1 – Improve Aviation Safety ......................................................... 2 R&D Principle 2 – Improve Efficiency ................................................................79 R&D Principle 3 – Reduce Environmental Impacts ..........................................93 Acronym List ........................................................................................................106 i FY 2014 R&D Annual Review List of Figures List of Figures Figure 1: Simulation Validation of GSE Impact Loading on 5-Frame .......................................... 2 Figure 2: Shear Tie Crushing Model Validation............................................................................ 3 Figure 3: Skin Cracking Model Validation ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • IPSOS / AIRLINES for AMERICA POLL DATA Prepared by Ipsos Public Affairs
    IPSOS / AIRLINES FOR AMERICA POLL DATA Prepared by Ipsos Public Affairs Ipsos Poll Conducted for Airlines for America 2017 Air Travelers Survey These are findings from an Ipsos poll conducted January 6-13, 2017 on behalf of Airlines for America. For the survey, a sample of 5,047 adults age 18+ from the continental U.S., Alaska and Hawaii was interviewed online in English. The sample for this study was randomly drawn from Ipsos’s online panel (see link below for more info on “Access Panels and Recruitment”), partner online panel sources, and “river” sampling (see link below for more info on the Ipsos “Ampario Overview” sample method) and does not rely on a population frame in the traditional sense. Ipsos uses fixed sample targets, unique to each study, in drawing sample. After a sample has been obtained from the Ipsos panel, Ipsos calibrates respondent characteristics to be representative of the U.S. Population using standard procedures such as raking-ratio adjustments. The source of these population targets is U.S. Census 2015 American Community Survey data. The sample drawn for this study reflects fixed sample targets on demographics. Post-hoc weights were made to the population characteristics on gender, age, region, race/ethnicity and income. Statistical margins of error are not applicable to online polls. All sample surveys and polls may be subject to other sources of error, including, but not limited to coverage error and measurement error. Where figures do not sum to 100, this is due to the effects of rounding. The precision of Ipsos online polls is measured using a credibility interval.
    [Show full text]
  • Ach Communication No. 010
    ACH COMMUNICATION NO. 010 DATE: January 13, 2020 TO: Participants of the Airlines Clearing House SUBJECT: Meeting Call – April 21-23, 2020 Meeting of the Revenue Accounting Committee With the concurrence of the Committee Chairperson, Ms. Brenda Fullmer, American Airlines, the annual meeting of the ACH Revenue Accounting Committee is hereby called to convene on Tuesday, April 21, 2020 at the Marriott San Francisco Union Square Hotel, 480 Sutter Street, San Francisco, CA. A block of rooms at a negotiated rate of $279 per night has been reserved to accommodate meeting attendees. Discounted in room Wi-Fi of $1 per day is available for non Bonvoy members. Meeting attendees are requested to reserve your room via the below link by no later than March 27, 2020. ACH Annual Revenue Accounting Meeting Please note that all meeting attendees are required to reserve their room accommodations through the above link. If not, the attendee will be assessed a meeting attendance fee of $100 per day to offset costs assessed by the Hotel in the event our block guarantee is not satisfied. Agenda Items are to be submitted via e-mail to [email protected] by no later than March, 13, 2020 in order to ensure distribution of the Meeting Agenda thirty (30) days prior to the meeting. ACH participants are advised that all Airlines Clearing House Participants are eligible to submit agenda items for consideration by the Revenue Accounting Committee. Furthermore, only ACH Sampling Members may vote on items related to Sampling. We look forward to your attendance and participation at the meeting.
    [Show full text]