DOCSLIB.ORG

Activation and Smart Safety Nets in FYR Macedonia: Constraints in Beneficiary Profile, Benefit Design, and Institutional Capacity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Activation and Smart Safety Nets in FYR Macedonia: Constraints in Beneficiary Profile, Benefit Design, and Institutional Capacity Activation and Smart Safety Nets in FYR Macedonia: Constraints in Beneficiary Profile, Benefit Design, and Institutional Capacity June 2013 This study is part of the Western Balkans Activation and Smart Safety Nets analytical and advisory services. It was completed by a World Bank team led by Boryana Gotcheva and Aylin Isik-Dikmelik, and including also Matteo Morgandi, Victoria Strokova, Tomas Damerau, Bojana Naceva, Zlatko Nikoloski, and Nikica Mojsoska-Blazevski. 1 Table of Contents List of Figures ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 List of Tables ....................................................................................................................................................................... 4 List of Boxes ........................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Abbreviations....................................................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Motivation of the Note .................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Objectives .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.3 Scope of Work and Methodology .................................................................................................................. 8 2. Profiling of Social Assistance Beneficiaries in FYR Macedonia ...................................................................... 10 2.1 A Framework to Understand Labor Market Outcomes for Safety Net Beneficiaries ........................ 10 2.2 Labor Market Profile of Social Safety Net Beneficiaries .......................................................................... 12 2.3 Advanced Profiling of SSN Beneficiaries ................................................................................................... 21 2.4 Implications of Profiling Results for Activation Policies ......................................................................... 26 3. Incentives and Disincentives in the SFA Design in FYR Macedonia ............................................................. 32 3.1 Main Benefits for the Work-Able ................................................................................................................ 32 3.2 Spending and Performance Characteristics of the SFA Program ........................................................... 35 3.3 Incentives and Disincentives in SFA Benefit Design ............................................................................... 38 3.4 Financial Disincentives Stemming from the Tax-Benefit System .......................................................... 43 4. Institutional Setup for Activation ......................................................................................................................... 47 4.1 Institutional Setup and Capacity .................................................................................................................. 47 4.2 Active Labor Market Programs .................................................................................................................... 51 5. Conclusions and Recommendations .................................................................................................................... 56 References .......................................................................................................................................................................... 59 Annex 1: Administrative data on Social Financial Assistance spending and beneficiary numbers ..................... 63 Annex 2: Performance indicators for Last Resort Social Assistance programs ...................................................... 64 Annex 3: Analysis of financial disincentives stemming from the tax-benefit system ............................................ 66 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 66 Measures of financial work incentives and benefit adequacy ................................................................................ 66 Unemployment benefit, as currently designed, is unlikely to weaken incentives to seek or accept low-paid jobs.................................................................................................................................................................................. 69 LRSA program’s design can be improved ................................................................................................................ 70 The extent of “inactivity traps” is limited in Macedonia ....................................................................................... 71 2 Reducing tax wedge for low wage earners, especially those working full-time, can increase financial gains from work ...................................................................................................................................................................... 73 Additional figures ......................................................................................................................................................... 75 Annex 4: Staff and caseload by local EA office ........................................................................................................... 77 Annex 5: Behavioral Requirements and Benefit Sanctions in Selected EU and OECD Countries, and the Western Balkan Countries ............................................................................................................................................... 79 List of Figures Figure 1: Employment Rates in the Western Balkans and Other European Countries, 2011-2012 ..................... 7 Figure 2: Analytical Framework of Constraints to Employment of Safety Net Beneficiaries.............................. 11 Figure 3: Age Composition of SSN Beneficiaries Relative to General Population in FYR Macedonia, 2009 .. 14 Figure 4: Labor Market Characteristics of Work-Able Population in FYR Macedonia, 2009 ............................. 14 Figure 5: Labor Force Participation Rates of SSN Beneficiaries in FYR Macedonia, by Gender, 2009 ............ 15 Figure 6: Gender and Age Composition of Employed, Unemployed, and Inactive in FYR Macedonia among work-able population, 2009 ............................................................................................................................................. 15 Figure 7: Safety Net Coverage of the Work-Able Population in FYR Macedonia, 2009 ...................................... 16 Figure 8: Employment and Unemployment Rates among the Work-Able Population in FYR Macedonia, 2009 .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 17 Figure 9: Work Status of Employed Safety Net Beneficiaries in FYR Macedonia, 2009...................................... 17 Figure 10: Share of Employed in Precarious Working Conditions in FYR Macedonia, 2009 ............................. 17 Figure 11: Education Distribution of Work-Able SSN Beneficiaries in FYR Macedonia, 2009 ......................... 18 Figure 12:: Employment and Labor Force Participation, by Education, in FYR Macedonia, 2009 ................... 18 Figure 13: Age Distribution of Work-Able SSN Beneficiaries in FYR Macedonia, 2009 .................................... 19 Figure 14: Likelihood of Working Informally, by Age, in FYR Macedonia, 2009 ................................................. 19 Figure 15: Share of Work-Able Population Living with At Least One Person in Need of Care in FYR Macedonia, 2009 ............................................................................................................................................................... 21 Figure 16: Employment Rate of Work-Able Women Living with a Person in Need of Care in FYR Macedonia, 2009 ............................................................................................................................................................... 21 Figure 17: Classes of Work-Able Beneficiaries in FYR Macedonia, 2009 ............................................................... 24 Figure 18: Degree of Labor Market Attachment, Poverty, and Education Level among Work-Able SSN Beneficiary Clusters in FYR Macedonia, 2009 ............................................................................................................. 26 Figure 19: Likelihood of Living in a Household with Caretaking Duties Relative to Employment Outcomes among Work-Able Beneficiary Clusters in FYR Macedonia ..................................................................................... 27 Figure 20: Matching Beneficiary Profiles and Activation Services in FYR Macedonia, by Client Group .......... 28 Figure 21: Structure of Spending on Social Protection in FYR Macedonia and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Draft Assessment Report: Skopje, North Macedonia
    Highlights of the draft Assessment report for Skopje, North Macedonia General highlights about the informal/illegal constructions in North Macedonia The Republic of North Macedonia belongs to the European continent, located at the heart of the Balkan Peninsula. It has approx. 2.1 million inhabitants and are of 25.713 km2. Skopje is the capital city, with 506,926 inhabitants (according to 2002 count). The country consists of 80 local self-government units (municipalities) and the city of Skopje as special form of local self-government unit. The City of Skopje consists of 10 municipalities, as follows: 1. Municipality of Aerodrom, 2. Municipality of Butel, 3. Municipality of Gazi Baba, 4. Municipality of Gorche Petrov, 5. Municipality of Karpos, 6. Municipality of Kisela Voda, 7. Municipality of Saraj, 8. Municipality of Centar, 9. Municipality of Chair and 10. Municipality of Shuto Orizari. During the transition period, the Republic of North Macedonia faced challenges in different sectors. The urban development is one of the sectors that was directly affected from the informal/illegally constructed buildings. According to statistical data, in 2019 there was a registration of 886 illegally built objects. Most of these objects (98.4 %) are built on private land. Considering the challenge for the urban development of the country, in 2011 the Government proposed, and the Parliament adopted a Law on the treatment of unlawful constructions. This Law introduced a legalization process. Institutions in charge for implementation of the legalization procedure are the municipalities in the City of Skopje (depending on the territory where the object is constructed) and the Ministry of Transport and Communication.
    [Show full text]
  • The Macedonian “Name” Dispute: the Macedonian Question—Resolved?
    Nationalities Papers (2020), 48: 2, 205–214 doi:10.1017/nps.2020.10 ANALYSIS OF CURRENT EVENTS The Macedonian “Name” Dispute: The Macedonian Question—Resolved? Matthew Nimetz* Former Personal Envoy of the Secretary-General of the United Nations and former Special Envoy of President Bill Clinton, New York, USA *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract The dispute between Greece and the newly formed state referred to as the “Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” that emerged out of the collapse of Yugoslavia in 1991 was a major source of instability in the Western Balkans for more than 25 years. It was resolved through negotiations between Athens and Skopje, mediated by the United Nations, resulting in the Prespa (or Prespes) Agreement, which was signed on June 17, 2018, and ratified by both parliaments amid controversy in their countries. The underlying issues involved deeply held and differing views relating to national identity, history, and the future of the region, which were resolved through a change in the name of the new state and various agreements as to identity issues. The author, the United Nations mediator in the dispute for 20 years and previously the United States presidential envoy with reference to the dispute, describes the basis of the dispute, the positions of the parties, and the factors that led to a successful resolution. Keywords: Macedonia; Greece; North Macedonia; “Name” dispute The Macedonian “name” dispute was, to most outsiders who somehow were faced with trying to understand it, certainly one of the more unusual international confrontations. When the dispute was resolved through the Prespa Agreement between Greece and (now) the Republic of North Macedonia in June 2018, most outsiders (as frequently expressed to me, the United Nations mediator for 20 years) responded, “Why did it take you so long?” And yet, as protracted conflicts go, the Macedonian “name” dispute is instructive as to the types of issues that go to the heart of a people’s identity and a nation’s sense of security.
    [Show full text]
  • Blood Ties: Religion, Violence, and the Politics of Nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878
    BLOOD TIES BLOOD TIES Religion, Violence, and the Politics of Nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878–1908 I˙pek Yosmaog˘lu Cornell University Press Ithaca & London Copyright © 2014 by Cornell University All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. For information, address Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. First published 2014 by Cornell University Press First printing, Cornell Paperbacks, 2014 Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Yosmaog˘lu, I˙pek, author. Blood ties : religion, violence,. and the politics of nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878–1908 / Ipek K. Yosmaog˘lu. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8014-5226-0 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-8014-7924-3 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Macedonia—History—1878–1912. 2. Nationalism—Macedonia—History. 3. Macedonian question. 4. Macedonia—Ethnic relations. 5. Ethnic conflict— Macedonia—History. 6. Political violence—Macedonia—History. I. Title. DR2215.Y67 2013 949.76′01—dc23 2013021661 Cornell University Press strives to use environmentally responsible suppliers and materials to the fullest extent possible in the publishing of its books. Such materials include vegetable-based, low-VOC inks and acid-free papers that are recycled, totally chlorine-free, or partly composed of nonwood fibers. For further information, visit our website at www.cornellpress.cornell.edu. Cloth printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Paperback printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 To Josh Contents Acknowledgments ix Note on Transliteration xiii Introduction 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • VOLUNTARY NATIONAL REVIEW North Macedonia July 2020
    VOLUNTARY NATIONAL REVIEW North Macedonia July 2020 North Macedonia ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: Coordination of the process of the National Voluntary Review and contribution to the Review was provided by Ana Jovanovska - Head of unit for Sustainable Development Unit from the Cabinet of Deputy President of the Government in Charge for Economic Affairs and Coordination of Economic Departments. Coordination of data collection and contribution to the Statistical Annex was provided by Snezana Sipovikj - Head of Unit for structural business statistics, business demography and FATS statistics, from the State Statistical Office. Acknowledgments for the contribution to the review: Office of the Prime minister Refet Hajdari The National Academy of Dushko Uzunoski Elena Ivanovska Science and arts Lura Pollozhani Ministry of Economy Chamber of commerce of Ivanna Hadjievska Macedonia Dane Taleski Marina Arsova Ilija Zupanovski Biljana Stojanovska Union of Chambers of Jasmina Majstorovska Commerce Cabinet of the Deputy Bekim Hadziu President in charge for Sofket Hazari MASIT economic affairs Blerim Zlarku Eva Bakalova Ministry of Health The process was supported by: Elena Trpeska Sandra Andovska Biljana Celevska Ksenija Nikolova Elena Kosevska Daniel Josifovski Mihajlo Kostovski Dane Josifovski Ministy of Education Viktor Andonov Filip Iliev Nadica Kostoska Bojan Atanasovski Ministry of Transport and General Secretariat of the Connections Government – Unit for Jasminka Kirkova collaboration with the Civil Society Organizations Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry
    [Show full text]
  • MACEDONIAN STUDIES1 M. B. Hatzopoulos Macedonia's
    CHAPTER 1 MACEDONIAN STUDIES1 M. B. Hatzopoulos Macedonia’s independence as a sovereign state ended after its last king’s defeat at the battle of Pydna in 168 bc. A republican Macedonia retained a formal autonomy until 148 or 146 bc as a Roman protectorate. From then on the permanent presence of a Roman governor reduced the former kingdom to a Roman province. Within that province, the survival of a distinct Macedonian entity with mainly festive attributions, the Macedo- nian koinon or ethnos, preserved a sense of a Macedonian identity at least until the beginning of the fourth century ad, from which period dates the last attestation of a person “ethnically” identifijied as “Macedonian.”2 Later on, successive reforms, which carved up the province or extended its appellation into new regions, creating new administrative units, such as Macedonia Prima, Macedonia Secunda or Macedonia Salutaris, blurred the contours of this geographical term. By the beginning of the ninth century the “theme”—the new name of the administrative units which replaced the old provinces from the seventh century onwards—of Mace- donia with its capital at Adrianople consisted not of Macedonian but of Thracian territories. During the Byzantine period Macedonia proper cor- responded to the “themes” of Thessaloniki and Strymon. The Ottoman administration ignored the name of Macedonia. It was only revived dur- ing the Renaissance, when western scholars rediscovered the ancient Greek geographical terminology, which they used in a rather loose way, since they could not easily match it with the geographic realities of their time. The memory of the ancient Macedonian kingdom had nevertheless survived among the Greek literate public thanks to the popularity of the successive versions of the Alexander Romance, while in the Greek folklore 1 This chapter is not meant as a bibliographical guide to Macedonian studies.
    [Show full text]
  • DENYING ETHNIC IDENTITY the Macedonians of Greece
    DDDENYING EEETHNIC IIIDENTITY The Macedonians of Greece Human Rights Watch/Helsinki (formerly Helsinki Watch) Human Rights Watch New York $$$ Washington $$$ Los Angeles $$$ London Copyright April 1994 by Human Rights Watch. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 94-75891 ISBN: 1-56432-132-0 Human Rights Watch/Helsinki Human Rights Watch/Helsinki, formerly Helsinki Watch, was established in 1978 to monitor and promote domestic and international compliance with the human rights provisions of the 1975 Helsinki accords. It is affiliated with the International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights, which is based in Vienna. The staff includes Jeri Laber, executive director; Lois Whitman, deputy director; Holly Cartner and Julie Mertus, counsels; Erika Dailey, Rachel Denber, Ivana Nizich and Christopher Panico, research associates; Christina Derry, Ivan Lupis, Alexander Petrov and Isabelle Tin-Aung, associates. The advisory committee chair is Jonathan Fanton; Alice Henkin is vice chair. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments.............................................................................................................................................viii Frequently Used Abbreviations................................................................................................................... ix Introduction and Conclusions........................................................................................................................1 Background................................................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethnic Relations in the Macedonian Society Measured Through the Concept of Affective Social Distance
    American International Journal of Social Science Vol. 2 No. 3; May 2013 The Ethnic Relations in the Macedonian Society Measured Through the Concept of Affective Social Distance Asst. Prof. Kire Sharlamanov Faculty of Communication International Balkan University Republic of Macedonia. Asst. Prof. Aleksandar Jovanoski Law Faculty, Kicevo University St. Kliment Ohridski, Bitola Republic of Macedonia. Abstract The research of certain aspects of coexistence of the members of different ethnic groups in contemporary societies implies more comprehensive scientific approach. Very often, the subject to sociologic interest in these socio- cultural surroundings represents reflection of political and legal solutions. However, the interethnic relations are characterized by their own specialty, which is more significant in sociological researches. This work includes an attempt, by using the Bogardus scale, to measure the attractiveness and the social distance between different ethnic groups in the Macedonian society. Important variables in the research of this issue include the characteristic independence of the Republic from the former Yugoslav federation, the internal conflict from 2001 and the Ohrid Framework Agreement – which defined the political and constitutional system of the country. The analysis for locus operandi uses the Macedonian and the Albanian ethnic community as demographic, political and economically most important communities in Republic of Macedonia. Key words: social distance, ethnic relations, Macedonians, Albanians, Republic of Macedonia. Introduction The pattern of behavior of the individuals who belong to different ethnic groups is a precondition for stable social development of the ethnically heterogeneous societies. Republic of Macedonia is an example of a multiethnic society consisting of different ethnic groups who have a tradition of mutual coexistence with historically ambivalent periods of coexistence.
    [Show full text]
  • Attempting to Resolve an Ethnic Conflict: the Language of the 2001 Macedonian Constitution1
    Southeast European Politics Vol. IV, No. 1 May 2003 pp. 25-40 Attempting to Resolve an Ethnic Conflict: 1 The Language of the 2001 Macedonian Constitution BILJANA BELAMARIC University of North Carolina ABSTRACT: The article analyzes modifications of principles and revisions of terminology pertaining to language and minority rights in the Macedonian Constitution, resulting from the 2001 ethnic conflict. The analysis provides insight into the correlation among historical, social, ethno-political, and linguistic factors in order to ascertain whether or not and to what extent the changes contributed to the resolution of the conflict. Additionally, the legal treatment of minority languages in Macedonia is evaluated in the context of its Constitutional precedent in SFRY and concomitants in Slovenia and Croatia. An examination of the amended principles and terminology of the Macedonian Constitution shows the changes to be largely cosmetic. Existent divisions based on ethnicity were not eliminated, as a power hierarchy of ethnic groups, although modified, continued to be stipulated. This and other elements of the Constitution may significantly contribute to a rekindling of animosities and the continuation of an ethnically unstable Macedonia. Introduction The Preamble and the 1992 Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia were amended in 2001 under external pressure from international mediators and internal pressure from ethnic Albanian political parties. My analysis of the changes of the Preamble and Constitution, as pertaining to language and minority rights, treats historical, ethno-political, and linguistic undercurrents, which must be considered in order to ascertain whether or not and to what extent the Constitutional changes have contributed to the resolution of the 2001 ethnic conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Heraldry in Macedonia with Special Regard to the People's/Socialist
    genealogy Article Heraldry in Macedonia with Special Regard to the People’s/Socialist Republic of Macedonia until 1991 Jovan Jonovski Macedonian Heraldic Society, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia; [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +389-70-252-989 Abstract: Every European region and country has some specific heraldry. In this paper, we will consider heraldry in the People’s/Socialist Republic of Macedonia, understood by the multitude of coats of arms, and armorial knowledge and art. Due to historical, as well as geographical factors, there is only a small number of coats of arms and a developing knowledge of art, which make this paper’s aim feasible. This paper covers the earliest preserved heraldic motifs and coats of arms found in Macedonia, as well as the attributed arms in European culture and armorials of Macedonia, the кing of Macedonia, and Alexander the Great of Macedonia. It also covers the land arms of Macedonia from the so-called Illyrian Heraldry, as well as the state and municipal heraldry of P/SR Macedonia. The paper covers the development of heraldry as both a discipline and science, and the development of heraldic thought in SR Macedonia until its independence in 1991. Keywords: heraldry of Macedonia; coats of arms of Macedonia; socialist heraldry; Macedonian municipal heraldry 1. Introduction Macedonia, as a region, is situated on the south of Balkan Peninsula in Southeast Citation: Jonovski, Jovan. 2021. Europe. The traditional boundaries of the geographical region of Macedonia are the lower Heraldry in Macedonia with Special Néstos (Mesta in Bulgaria) River and the Rhodope Mountains to the east; the Skopska Crna Regard to the People’s/Socialist Gora and Shar mountains, bordering Southern Serbia, in the north; the Korab range and Republic of Macedonia until 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • Stabilisation and Association Process
    THE WESTERN BALKANS The EU has developed a policy to support the gradual integration of the Western Balkan countries with the Union. On 1 July 2013, Croatia became the first of the seven countries to join, and Montenegro, Serbia, the Republic of North Macedonia and Albania are official candidates. Accession negotiations and chapters have been opened with Montenegro and Serbia, and Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo are potential candidate countries. LEGAL BASIS — Title V of the Treaty on European Union (TEU): EU external action; — Article 207 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU): international trade agreements; — Article 49 of the TEU: criteria for application and membership. OBJECTIVES The EU aims to promote peace, stability and economic development in the Western Balkans and open up the prospect of EU integration. BACKGROUND In 1999, the EU launched the Stabilisation and Association Process (SAP), a framework for relations between the EU and countries in the region, and the Stability Pact, a broader initiative involving all key international players. The Stability Pact was replaced by the Regional Cooperation Council in 2008. The 2003 European Council in Thessaloniki reaffirmed that all SAP countries were potential candidates for EU membership. This ‘European perspective’ was reaffirmed in the Commission’s February 2018 Western Balkans Strategy and in the declarations following successive EU-Western Balkans Summits. INSTRUMENTS A. The Stabilisation and Association Process (SAP) Launched in 1999, the SAP is the strategic framework supporting the gradual rapprochement of the Western Balkan countries with the EU. It is based on bilateral contractual relations, financial assistance, political dialogue, trade relations and regional cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonia: Far More Than a Name to Greece Dean M
    Hastings International and Comparative Law Review Volume 18 Article 5 Number 2 Winter 1995 1-1-1995 Macedonia: Far More Than a Name to Greece Dean M. Poulakidas Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_international_comparative_law_review Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Dean M. Poulakidas, Macedonia: Far More Than a Name to Greece, 18 Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 397 (1995). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_international_comparative_law_review/vol18/iss2/5 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Macedonia: Far More Than a Name to Greece By DEAN M. POULAKIDAS* Table of Contents I. Introduction ............................................ 397 II. The Ancient History Behind the Name "Macedonia"... 399 III. The History of the Land and Peoples of Macedonia: From Antiquity to Modernity ........................... 405 IV. The Creation of Yugoslavia and a Second "M acedonia" ............................................ 421 V. Skopje: Its Continued Expansionist Threat and Its Fight for International Recognition Under the Name "M acedonia" ............................................ 429 VI. Conclusion .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Progress in Resolving the Greek- Macedonian Name Dispute: Will It Break the Gordian Knot at Last? Erwan Fouéré
    18 June 2018 Progress in resolving the Greek- Macedonian name dispute: Will it break the Gordian knot at last? Erwan Fouéré Some might argue that Macedonia is being asked to pay an unduly heavy price simply for the sake of starting EU accession negotiations, while others will believe that the Agreement reached last weekend is well worth that price. f all the many bilateral disputes that continue to cast a shadow over the Western Balkan region, none is more symbolic of the deep-rooted legacy of history and the O politics of identity and nationalism that pervade the region than the dispute that has divided the two neighbouring countries, Greece and Macedonia, for decades and more recently since the latter’s independence in 1991 following the break-up of the former Yugoslavia. Greece, whose northern province is also called Macedonia, used every opportunity to make clear its objection to what it perceived as the appropriation by Macedonia of the heritage of Alexander the Great, and what it called its “irredentist behaviour”. Macedonia’s admission to the UN under the provisional name of the “former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” was blocked for over a year until 1993. The Interim Agreement of 1995 lifted the 20-month Greek blockade against Macedonia and committed both sides to continue negotiations under UN auspices and enjoined Greece from blocking Macedonia’s application for membership in other international bodies as long as it did so under the provisional name. Under the patient guidance of the UN mediator Matthew Nimetz appointed in 1995, various attempts were made over the years to find a compromise solution.
    [Show full text]