DOCSLIB.ORG

Fishery Bulletin/U S Dept of Commerce National Oceanic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Abstract. - Complete series of field-collected larvae were used to Post-yolksac larval development describe the post-yolksac develop­ ment of two common southern Cali­ of two southern California fornia marine sculpins, Clinocottus anah"s and O.,.tJumopW.s triacis. Char­ sculpins, C/inocottus ana/is and acters diagnostic of C. a.na.lis include nape pigment, dorsal head pigment, Orthonopias triacis (Pisces: CottidaeJ heavy rows of dorsal gut melano­ phores, 18-33 postanal ventral mela­ nophores (PAVM). Postflexion lar­ Richard F. Feeney vae develop multiple preopercular Section of Fishes. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County spines (9-12) and several post-tem­ poral/supracleithral spines, and later 900 Exposition Boulevard. Los Angeles. California 90007 stages also acquire a W-shaped patch of pigment on the body under the second dorsal fin. Characters diag­ nostic of 01'thonopias triads include Clinocottus analis and Ot·thonopias renee of adults in California coastal a heavy cap of dorsoposterior gut pigment, 26-55 PAVM, occasional­ triacis are two common marine scul­ waters and the existence of several ly one or two dorsocranial melano­ pins (Pisces: Cottidae) of the rocky partial descriptions of their larval phores, and, rarely, one melanophore intertidal and subtidal areas of south­ development in the literature. at the nape; postflexion O. tr,:acis ern California (Miller and Lea 1972, The following is a description of develop four preopercular spines. Eschmeyer et al. 1983). The range of larval series for both C. analis and O. Comparison with other cottid species is included. C. analis extends from Cape Men­ triacis based on field-collected spe­ Field collection data (1978-85) in­ docino, northern California, to Asun­ cimens from southern California and dicate C. analis and O. trine'is larvae cion Pt., Baja California Sur; O. tri­ Baja California, Mexico. Comparison both occur in greatest densities off aris extends from Monterey, central with other cottid species and occur­ rocky habitats along the 15m iso­ California, to San Geronimo 1., cen­ rence is discussed. A key to known bath. A key is provided for known preflexion marine sculpin larvae tral Baja California (Fig. 1). southern California preflexion cottid found in southern California. A description of the embryology larvae is included to summarize early­ and larval development of Clinocot­ life-history information from many tus analis was first attempted by sources including Richardson and Eigenmann (1892) who gave a pre­ Washington (1980), Richardson (1981), liminary description of the eggs and Washington et al, (1984), Washing­ yolksac larvae of C. analis from ton (1986), Feeney (1987), and Mata­ reared eggs obtained in San Diego rese et al. (1989). This work is in­ Bay CA, and subsequently by Budd tended to aid in identification and (1940) from eggs obtained in Monte­ hopefully stimulate further research rey Bay CA. In both studies the lar­ on the development of related species. vae died at the end of the yolksac stage. Bolin (1941) described the em­ Materials and methods bryology and yolksac development of reared Orthonopias triacis. A total of 145 larvae and 9 juveniles Hubbs (1966) described many char­ of Clinocottus ana.lis and 322 larvae acteristics of C. a.nalis embryology, and 4 juveniles of Orthonopias t'ria­ especially in response to tempera­ cis were studied. Specimens were ex­ ture, but gave no description of the amined from the Scripps Vertebrate larvae. Washington (1986) presented Collection (SIO), the Southwest Fish­ a description of a limited series of eries Science Center (SWFSC), the postflexion C. analis larvae and juve­ California Academy of Sciences (CAS), niles identified on the basis ofmeris­ and the Natural History Museum tic and morphological characters. A of Los Angeles County, Section of 7.0mm O. tria.cis was previously il­ Fishes (LACM). lustrated (Washington et al, 1984). The SIO specimens (21) are pre­ No description, however, of a com­ served in 50% isopropanol and were Manuscript accepted 6 May 1992. plete larval series of either species collected in Baja California at Bahia Fishery Bulletin, U.S. 90:454-468 (1992). exists, despite the common occur- Todos Santos (SIO H51-19B); the lot 454 Feeney: Post-yolksac development of two southern California sculpins 455 and during the Bightwide Program; methods and station locations can be found in Brewer et al. I I (1981), Brewer and Smith (1982), and Lavenberg I I et al. (1986). Also, five postflexion C. analis Cape A-lendocll1o : r specimens (LACM 45404-1,45414-1-45417-1; in I CfilllJcoltus ollalis - I :.:-li?~J I ethanol) were collected at the Catalina Island California I, OrtJronopias triads - I,i.;., ...... I Marine Science Center (Ninos 1984). Six addi­ ,, ,, tional C. analis juveniles from the general LACM " collection were used: four collected at Santa Bar­ , , ,, bara Island (LACM 31546-4), one at Catalina ,, Island (LACM 35695-1), and one at Palos Verdes , , , , Peninsula (LACM 1993). Morphometric data, including preanal length, body depth, pectoral length, head length, and eye diameter were measured from 50 C. analis and 54 O. triacis specimens. Data were entered into ...... _._. an "Excel" spreadsheet program on a Macintosh IIci. Means and standard deviation of morpho­ metric measurements were computed using "SYSTAT." Frequency plots of melanophores vs. length were made using "SYGRAPH" and the "LOWESS" (locally-weighted least squares) scat­ terplot smoothing method (Wilkinson 1989). Specimens were illustrated using a camera Pa.:ffi.: Oaall lucida attached to a Wild M3 stereomicroscope. Occurrence data are based on specimens taken during 1978-85 on ICHS and Bightwide cruises using a variety of sampling gears. During Coastal Resources collections (ICHS cruises, 1978-79) oblique bongo samples and discrete depth samples Figure 1 were taken monthly along a grid of 10 transects, Geographic range of Clinocottus anal-is and Odhonopias t.,..iacis. each with 4 stations. The transects were evenly spaced along the coast from Point Conception to San Diego. The stations corresponded to bottom depths of 8, 15, 22, and 36m. Additionally, 8 contained an excellent series of both C. analis and stations (4 sites each) were located in Los Angeles­ O. triacis postflexion larvae, the discovery of which Long Beach Harbor and San Diego Bay. Integrated became the impetus for the present study. water-column samples were collected by fishing a 70cm The SWFSC material (10 specimens) is preserved in bongo sampler from the bottom to the surface. Discrete 5% formalin; some specimens (6) were collected in Baja depth samples were collected at the surface (manta (6607-AX-llO.32; 6806-JD-llO.32; SWFSC/SIO H51­ sampler), at the mid-depth of the water column (70cm 106), the remainder were collected in California. Two bongo sampler) and at the bottom (70cm bongo sampler C. analis specimens (SWFSC/SIO H46-63) and two equipped with wheels). All samplers had nets of 335/-1 O. triac.is (SWFSC 6607-AX-llO.32) were cleared and mesh Nitex, and attached flowmeters gave estimates stained. of the volume of water filtered. During the 316b phase CAS material included one lot of postflexion C. analis (ICHS cruises, 1979-80) the number of transects was (SU 68789, 70% ethanol), collected in Monterey Bay, increased to 20 and the number of stations was reduced California. to 2 (8 and 22m) except for 4 "expanded" transects LACM specimens (fixed in 5% formalin and pre­ (Ormond Beach, Playa del Rey, Seal Beach, San served in either 5% formalin or 70% ethanol) were col­ Onofre), which retained 4 stations (8, 15, 22, and 36m). lected in coastal waters « 75 m depth) ofthe Southern For epibenthic sampling, the benthic bongo sampler California Bight between Pt. Conception and the Mex­ was replaced by a larger "Auriga" sampler. Collections ican border. Most specimens were collected during the were taken monthly during the 316b phase. Samples Coastal Resources and 316b phases of the Ichthyo­ were sporadically taken in 1981, but no datafrom them plankton Coastal and Harbor Studies (ICHS) Program are used here. 456 Fishery Bulletin 90(3). J 992 ... .------ - -- ' . "-- ." .". .... .,. .~ . .. ........-( . B --------- c Figure 2 Field-collected Clinoc.Qttus analis larvae: (A) 3.9mm (LACM KH #22), (B) 5.6mm (LACM KH #22), (C) 5.6mm (LACM 018-SQ-36-AU-Ol), (D) 8.6mm (SIO H51-19B). Feeney: Post-yolksac development of two southern California sculpins 457 The Bightwide program began in 1982 and samples Table 1 were taken bimonthly at the four "expanded" 316b Morphometries of larvae and juveniles of Clinocottus anabis transects. During the Bightwide program, a fifth sta­ and 01·thonopias t1"iacis, represented as a mean percentage tion (75m) was added to each transect. Only oblique of standard length ± the standard deviation, with range in bongo samples were taken during the Bightwide phase. parentheses. Additional details are provided in Lavenberg et al. Measurement (1986). stage elinor-ottus analis 01·thonopias t'riacis Estimates of larval abundance (n/10m2 of sea sur­ face) for each taxon were estimated (for methods, see Preanal length Preflexion 46.0 ± 3.4(40.0-52.2) 38.8 ± 3.0(31.5-44.8) Smith and Richardson 1977). These abundances were Flexion 47.1 ±2.2(44.6-48.5) 41.7 ± 2.8(37.8-47.2) plotted against variables, such as transect, station Postflexion 50.5 ±2.1(46.9-54.5) 43.5 ± 3.0(39.1-48.3) depth. gear type and date, to determine patterns of Juvenile 47.3 ± 1.1(46.0-48.4) 43.5 ±2.7(39.9-46.3) local occurrence. Body depth Preflexion 24.8±2.2(19.7-29.7) 24.3 ± 3.1(19.8-33.2) Flexion ~3.8 ±2.2(21.3-25.3) 24.3 ±2.9(19.8-28.5) Identification Postflexion 28.7 ± 2.0(25.6-32.7) 25.9 ± 2.4(22.1-29.5) Juvenile 26.4 ±2.7(24.5-30.4) 23.6 ± 1.6(21.7-25.3) Yolksac and small post-yolksac larvae of Clinocottus Pectoral length analis and Orthonopias t·riacis were identified by com­ Preflexion 8.5± 1.3 (6.6-11.3) 8.1 ± 1.2 (6.1-11.3) parison with descriptions of reared larvae (Eigenmann Flexion 8.9 ±2.0 (7.3-11.2) 1O.2±~.6 (6.3-16.0) Postflexion 27.8±4.3(16.9-32.5) 18.2 ± 5.0(10.8-25.4) 1892, Budd 1940, Bolin 1941).
Recommended publications
  • CHECKLIST and BIOGEOGRAPHY of FISHES from GUADALUPE ISLAND, WESTERN MEXICO Héctor Reyes-Bonilla, Arturo Ayala-Bocos, Luis E

    CHECKLIST and BIOGEOGRAPHY of FISHES from GUADALUPE ISLAND, WESTERN MEXICO Héctor Reyes-Bonilla, Arturo Ayala-Bocos, Luis E

    ReyeS-BONIllA eT Al: CheCklIST AND BIOgeOgRAphy Of fISheS fROm gUADAlUpe ISlAND CalCOfI Rep., Vol. 51, 2010 CHECKLIST AND BIOGEOGRAPHY OF FISHES FROM GUADALUPE ISLAND, WESTERN MEXICO Héctor REyES-BONILLA, Arturo AyALA-BOCOS, LUIS E. Calderon-AGUILERA SAúL GONzáLEz-Romero, ISRAEL SáNCHEz-ALCántara Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada AND MARIANA Walther MENDOzA Carretera Tijuana - Ensenada # 3918, zona Playitas, C.P. 22860 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur Ensenada, B.C., México Departamento de Biología Marina Tel: +52 646 1750500, ext. 25257; Fax: +52 646 Apartado postal 19-B, CP 23080 [email protected] La Paz, B.C.S., México. Tel: (612) 123-8800, ext. 4160; Fax: (612) 123-8819 NADIA C. Olivares-BAñUELOS [email protected] Reserva de la Biosfera Isla Guadalupe Comisión Nacional de áreas Naturales Protegidas yULIANA R. BEDOLLA-GUzMáN AND Avenida del Puerto 375, local 30 Arturo RAMíREz-VALDEz Fraccionamiento Playas de Ensenada, C.P. 22880 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Ensenada, B.C., México Facultad de Ciencias Marinas, Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Carr. Tijuana-Ensenada km. 107, Apartado postal 453, C.P. 22890 Ensenada, B.C., México ABSTRACT recognized the biological and ecological significance of Guadalupe Island, off Baja California, México, is Guadalupe Island, and declared it a Biosphere Reserve an important fishing area which also harbors high (SEMARNAT 2005). marine biodiversity. Based on field data, literature Guadalupe Island is isolated, far away from the main- reviews, and scientific collection records, we pres- land and has limited logistic facilities to conduct scien- ent a comprehensive checklist of the local fish fauna, tific studies.
  • ASSESSMENT of COASTAL WATER RESOURCES and WATERSHED CONDITIONS at CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK, CALIFORNIA Dr. Diana L. Engle

    ASSESSMENT of COASTAL WATER RESOURCES and WATERSHED CONDITIONS at CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK, CALIFORNIA Dr. Diana L. Engle

    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Technical Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR-2006/354 Water Resources Division Natural Resource Program Centerent of the Interior ASSESSMENT OF COASTAL WATER RESOURCES AND WATERSHED CONDITIONS AT CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK, CALIFORNIA Dr. Diana L. Engle The National Park Service Water Resources Division is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operational support to units of the National Park System. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, marine resource management, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, watershed studies, and aquatic ecology. Technical Reports The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the Natural Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: National Park Service (970) 225-3500 Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 National Park Service (303) 969-2130 Technical Information Center Denver Service Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 Cover photos: Top Left: Santa Cruz, Kristen Keteles Top Right: Brown Pelican, NPS photo Bottom Left: Red Abalone, NPS photo Bottom Left: Santa Rosa, Kristen Keteles Bottom Middle: Anacapa, Kristen Keteles Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Channel Islands National Park, California Dr. Diana L.
  • Amphibious Fishes: Terrestrial Locomotion, Performance, Orientation, and Behaviors from an Applied Perspective by Noah R

    Amphibious Fishes: Terrestrial Locomotion, Performance, Orientation, and Behaviors from an Applied Perspective by Noah R

    AMPHIBIOUS FISHES: TERRESTRIAL LOCOMOTION, PERFORMANCE, ORIENTATION, AND BEHAVIORS FROM AN APPLIED PERSPECTIVE BY NOAH R. BRESSMAN A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of WAKE FOREST UNIVESITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Biology May 2020 Winston-Salem, North Carolina Approved By: Miriam A. Ashley-Ross, Ph.D., Advisor Alice C. Gibb, Ph.D., Chair T. Michael Anderson, Ph.D. Bill Conner, Ph.D. Glen Mars, Ph.D. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my adviser Dr. Miriam Ashley-Ross for mentoring me and providing all of her support throughout my doctoral program. I would also like to thank the rest of my committee – Drs. T. Michael Anderson, Glen Marrs, Alice Gibb, and Bill Conner – for teaching me new skills and supporting me along the way. My dissertation research would not have been possible without the help of my collaborators, Drs. Jeff Hill, Joe Love, and Ben Perlman. Additionally, I am very appreciative of the many undergraduate and high school students who helped me collect and analyze data – Mark Simms, Tyler King, Caroline Horne, John Crumpler, John S. Gallen, Emily Lovern, Samir Lalani, Rob Sheppard, Cal Morrison, Imoh Udoh, Harrison McCamy, Laura Miron, and Amaya Pitts. I would like to thank my fellow graduate student labmates – Francesca Giammona, Dan O’Donnell, MC Regan, and Christine Vega – for their support and helping me flesh out ideas. I am appreciative of Dr. Ryan Earley, Dr. Bruce Turner, Allison Durland Donahou, Mary Groves, Tim Groves, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, UF Tropical Aquaculture Lab for providing fish, animal care, and lab space throughout my doctoral research.
  • Dean Oz/Μ: ;Z: Date

    Dean Oz/Μ: ;Z: Date

    The evolutionary history of reproductive strategies in sculpins of the subfamily oligocottinae Item Type Thesis Authors Buser, Thaddaeus J. Download date 26/09/2021 18:39:58 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/4549 THE EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES IN SCULPINS OF THE SUBFAMILY OLIGOCOTTINAE By Thaddaeus J. Buser RECOMMENDED: Dr. Anne Beaudreau Dr. J. Andres Lopez Advisory Committee Chair Dr. Shannon Atkinson Fisheries Division Graduate Program Chair APPROVED: Dr. Michael Castellini ·. John Eichel erger Dean oZ/µ:_;z: Date THE EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES IN SCULPINS OF THE SUBFAMILY OLIGOCOTTINAE A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the University of Alaska Fairbanks in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Title Page MASTER OF SCIENCE By Thaddaeus J. Buser, B.Sc. Fairbanks, Alaska May 2014 v Abstract The sculpin subfamily Oligocottinae is a group of 17 nearshore species and is noteworthy for the fact that it contains both intertidal and subtidal species, copulating and non- copulating species, and many species with very broad geographic ranges. These factors, as well as the consistency with which the constituent genera have been grouped together historically, make the Oligocottinae an ideal group for the study of the evolution of a reproductive mode known as internal gamete association (IGA), which is unique to sculpins. I conducted a phylogenetic study of the oligocottine sculpins based on an extensive molecular dataset consisting of DNA sequences from eight genomic regions. From the variability present in those sequences, I inferred phylogenetic relationships using parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian inference. Results of these phylogenetic analyses show that some historical taxonomy and classifications require revision to align taxonomy with evolutionary relatedness.
  • XIV. Appendices

    XIV. Appendices

    Appendix 1, Page 1 XIV. Appendices Appendix 1. Vertebrate Species of Alaska1 * Threatened/Endangered Fishes Scientific Name Common Name Eptatretus deani black hagfish Lampetra tridentata Pacific lamprey Lampetra camtschatica Arctic lamprey Lampetra alaskense Alaskan brook lamprey Lampetra ayresii river lamprey Lampetra richardsoni western brook lamprey Hydrolagus colliei spotted ratfish Prionace glauca blue shark Apristurus brunneus brown cat shark Lamna ditropis salmon shark Carcharodon carcharias white shark Cetorhinus maximus basking shark Hexanchus griseus bluntnose sixgill shark Somniosus pacificus Pacific sleeper shark Squalus acanthias spiny dogfish Raja binoculata big skate Raja rhina longnose skate Bathyraja parmifera Alaska skate Bathyraja aleutica Aleutian skate Bathyraja interrupta sandpaper skate Bathyraja lindbergi Commander skate Bathyraja abyssicola deepsea skate Bathyraja maculata whiteblotched skate Bathyraja minispinosa whitebrow skate Bathyraja trachura roughtail skate Bathyraja taranetzi mud skate Bathyraja violacea Okhotsk skate Acipenser medirostris green sturgeon Acipenser transmontanus white sturgeon Polyacanthonotus challengeri longnose tapirfish Synaphobranchus affinis slope cutthroat eel Histiobranchus bathybius deepwater cutthroat eel Avocettina infans blackline snipe eel Nemichthys scolopaceus slender snipe eel Alosa sapidissima American shad Clupea pallasii Pacific herring 1 This appendix lists the vertebrate species of Alaska, but it does not include subspecies, even though some of those are featured in the CWCS.
  • A List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes from the United States And

    A List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes from the United States And

    t a AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY QL 614 .A43 V.2 .A 4-3 AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY Special Publication No. 2 A List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes -^ ru from the United States m CD and Canada (SECOND EDITION) A/^Ssrf>* '-^\ —---^ Report of the Committee on Names of Fishes, Presented at the Ei^ty-ninth Annual Meeting, Clearwater, Florida, September 16-18, 1959 Reeve M. Bailey, Chairman Ernest A. Lachner, C. C. Lindsey, C. Richard Robins Phil M. Roedel, W. B. Scott, Loren P. Woods Ann Arbor, Michigan • 1960 Copies of this publication may be purchased for $1.00 each (paper cover) or $2.00 (cloth cover). Orders, accompanied by remittance payable to the American Fisheries Society, should be addressed to E. A. Seaman, Secretary-Treasurer, American Fisheries Society, Box 483, McLean, Virginia. Copyright 1960 American Fisheries Society Printed by Waverly Press, Inc. Baltimore, Maryland lutroduction This second list of the names of fishes of The shore fishes from Greenland, eastern the United States and Canada is not sim- Canada and the United States, and the ply a reprinting with corrections, but con- northern Gulf of Mexico to the mouth of stitutes a major revision and enlargement. the Rio Grande are included, but those The earlier list, published in 1948 as Special from Iceland, Bermuda, the Bahamas, Cuba Publication No. 1 of the American Fisheries and the other West Indian islands, and Society, has been widely used and has Mexico are excluded unless they occur also contributed substantially toward its goal of in the region covered. In the Pacific, the achieving uniformity and avoiding confusion area treated includes that part of the conti- in nomenclature.
  • Fish Bulletin 161. California Marine Fish Landings for 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California

    Fish Bulletin 161. California Marine Fish Landings for 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California

    UC San Diego Fish Bulletin Title Fish Bulletin 161. California Marine Fish Landings For 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/93g734v0 Authors Pinkas, Leo Gates, Doyle E Frey, Herbert W Publication Date 1974 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME FISH BULLETIN 161 California Marine Fish Landings For 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California By Leo Pinkas Marine Resources Region and By Doyle E. Gates and Herbert W. Frey > Marine Resources Region 1974 1 Figure 1. Geographical areas used to summarize California Fisheries statistics. 2 3 1. CALIFORNIA MARINE FISH LANDINGS FOR 1972 LEO PINKAS Marine Resources Region 1.1. INTRODUCTION The protection, propagation, and wise utilization of California's living marine resources (established as common property by statute, Section 1600, Fish and Game Code) is dependent upon the welding of biological, environment- al, economic, and sociological factors. Fundamental to each of these factors, as well as the entire management pro- cess, are harvest records. The California Department of Fish and Game began gathering commercial fisheries land- ing data in 1916. Commercial fish catches were first published in 1929 for the years 1926 and 1927. This report, the 32nd in the landing series, is for the calendar year 1972. It summarizes commercial fishing activities in marine as well as fresh waters and includes the catches of the sportfishing partyboat fleet. Preliminary landing data are published annually in the circular series which also enumerates certain fishery products produced from the catch.
  • Response of an Intertidal Sculpin to a Multi-Stressor

    Response of an Intertidal Sculpin to a Multi-Stressor

    Facing a Physiological Crossroad: Response of an Intertidal Sculpin to a Multi-stressor Challenge by Joshua R. Hancock A thesis submitted to Sonoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Biology Dr. Sean P. Place, Chair Dr. Daniel E. Crocker Dr. Sean C. Lema Date: 05 – 25 – 2016 Copyright 2016 By Joshua R. Hancock ii Authorization for Reproduction of Master’s Thesis Permission to reproduce this thesis in its entirety must be obtained from me. Permission to reproduce parts of this thesis must be obtained from me. Date: 05 – 25 – 2016 Name: Joshua R. Hancock iii Facing a Physiological Crossroad: Response of an Intertidal Sculpin to a Multi-stressor Challenge Thesis by Joshua R. Hancock Abstract As we move into the Anthropocene, organisms inhabiting marine environments will continue to face growing challenges associated with changes in ocean pH (ocean acidification), dissolved oxygen (dead zones) and temperature. These factors, in combination with naturally variable environments such as the rocky intertidal, may create extreme physiological challenges for organisms that are already performing near their biological limits. Although numerous studies have examined the impacts of climate related stressors on intertidal animals, little is known about the underlying physiological mechanisms driving adaptation to ocean acidification and how this may alter organism interactions, particularly in marine vertebrates. Therefore, we have investigated the effects of decreased ocean pH on the hypoxia response of an intertidal sculpin, Clinocottus analis. We used both whole animal and biochemical based analyses to examine how the energetic demands associated with acclimation to low pH environments may impact the fish’s reliance on facultative air breathing in low oxygen environments.
  • Cymothoidae) from Sub-Sahara Africa

    Cymothoidae) from Sub-Sahara Africa

    Biodiversity and systematics of branchial cavity inhabiting fish parasitic isopods (Cymothoidae) from sub-Sahara Africa S van der Wal orcid.org/0000-0002-7416-8777 Previous qualification (not compulsory) Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Masters degree in Environmental Sciences at the North-West University Supervisor: Prof NJ Smit Co-supervisor: Dr KA Malherbe Graduation May 2018 23394536 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................... VI LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................. XIII ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................. XIV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................... XV ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................... XVI CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Subphylum Crustacea Brünnich, 1772 ............................................................ 2 1.2 Order Isopoda Latreille, 1817 ........................................................................... 2 1.3 Parasitic Isopoda .............................................................................................
  • Testing the Link Between Habitat, Morphology, and Reproduction in the Intertidal Sculpin Subfamily Oligocottinae (Pisces: Cottoidea)

    Testing the Link Between Habitat, Morphology, and Reproduction in the Intertidal Sculpin Subfamily Oligocottinae (Pisces: Cottoidea)

    Littorally adaptive? Testing the link between habitat, morphology, and reproduction in the intertidal sculpin subfamily Oligocottinae (Pisces: Cottoidea) Thaddaeus J. Buser1, Michael D. Burns1 and J. Andrés López2,3 1 Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States of America 2 College of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska—Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, United States of America 3 University of Alaska Museum, Fairbanks, AK, United States of America ABSTRACT While intertidal habitats are often productive, species-rich environments, they are also harsh and highly dynamic. Organisms that live in these habitats must possess morphological and physiological adaptations that enable them to do so. Intertidal fishes are generally small, often lack scales, and the diverse families represented in intertidal habitats often show convergence into a few general body shapes. However, few studies have quantified the relationship between phenotypes and intertidal living. Likewise, the diversity of reproductive traits and parental care in intertidal fishes has yet to be compared quantitatively with habitat. We examine the relationship of these characters in the sculpin subfamily Oligocottinae using a phylogenetic hypothesis, geometric morphometrics, and phylogenetic comparative methods to provide the first formal test of associations between fish phenotypes and reproductive characters with intertidal habitats. We show that the ability to live in intertidal habitats, particularly in tide pools, is likely a primitive state for Oligocottinae, with a single species that has secondarily come to occupy only subtidal habitats. Contrary to previous hypotheses, Submitted 31 January 2017 Accepted 11 July 2017 maximum size and presence of scales do not show a statistically significant correlation Published 10 August 2017 with depth.
  • Guide to the Coastal Marine Fishes of California

    Guide to the Coastal Marine Fishes of California

    STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME FISH BULLETIN 157 GUIDE TO THE COASTAL MARINE FISHES OF CALIFORNIA by DANIEL J. MILLER and ROBERT N. LEA Marine Resources Region 1972 ABSTRACT This is a comprehensive identification guide encompassing all shallow marine fishes within California waters. Geographic range limits, maximum size, depth range, a brief color description, and some meristic counts including, if available: fin ray counts, lateral line pores, lateral line scales, gill rakers, and vertebrae are given. Body proportions and shapes are used in the keys and a state- ment concerning the rarity or commonness in California is given for each species. In all, 554 species are described. Three of these have not been re- corded or confirmed as occurring in California waters but are included since they are apt to appear. The remainder have been recorded as occurring in an area between the Mexican and Oregon borders and offshore to at least 50 miles. Five of California species as yet have not been named or described, and ichthyologists studying these new forms have given information on identification to enable inclusion here. A dichotomous key to 144 families includes an outline figure of a repre- sentative for all but two families. Keys are presented for all larger families, and diagnostic features are pointed out on most of the figures. Illustrations are presented for all but eight species. Of the 554 species, 439 are found primarily in depths less than 400 ft., 48 are meso- or bathypelagic species, and 67 are deepwater bottom dwelling forms rarely taken in less than 400 ft.
  • Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Channel Islands National Park, California

    Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Channel Islands National Park, California

    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Technical Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR-2006/354 Water Resources Division Natural Resource Program Center Natural Resource Program Centerent of the Interior ASSESSMENT OF COASTAL WATER RESOURCES AND WATERSHED CONDITIONS AT CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK, CALIFORNIA Dr. Diana L. Engle The National Park Service Water Resources Division is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operational support to units of the National Park System. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, marine resource management, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, watershed studies, and aquatic ecology. Technical Reports The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the Natural Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: National Park Service (970) 225-3500 Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 National Park Service (303) 969-2130 Technical Information Center Denver Service Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 Cover photos: Top Left: Santa Cruz, Kristen Keteles Top Right: Brown Pelican, NPS photo Bottom Left: Red Abalone, NPS photo Bottom Left: Santa Rosa, Kristen Keteles Bottom Middle: Anacapa, Kristen Keteles Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Channel Islands National Park, California Dr.