DOCSLIB.ORG

Mining Saltmarsh Sediment Microbes for Enzymes to Degrade Recalcitrant Biomass

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mining Saltmarsh Sediment Microbes for Enzymes to Degrade Recalcitrant Biomass Mining saltmarsh sediment microbes for enzymes to degrade recalcitrant biomass Juliana Sanchez Alponti PhD University of York Biology September 2019 Abstract Abstract The recalcitrance of biomass represents a major bottleneck for the efficient production of fermentable sugars from biomass. Cellulase cocktails are often only able to release 75-80% of the potential sugars from biomass and this adds to the overall costs of lignocellulosic processing. The high amounts of fresh water used in biomass processing also adds to the overall costs and environmental footprint of this process. A more sustainable approach could be the use of seawater during the process, saving the valuable fresh water for human consumption and agriculture. For such replacement to be viable, there is a need to identify salt tolerant lignocellulose-degrading enzymes. We have been prospecting for enzymes from the marine environment that attack the more recalcitrant components of lignocellulosic biomass. To achieve these ends, we have carried out selective culture enrichments using highly degraded biomass and inoculum taken from a saltmarsh. Saltmarshes are highly productive ecosystems, where most of the biomass is provided by land plants and is therefore rich in lignocellulose. Lignocellulose forms the major source of biomass to feed the large communities of heterotrophic organisms living in saltmarshes, which are likely to contain a range of microbial species specialised for the degradation of lignocellulosic biomass. We took biomass from the saltmarsh grass Spartina anglica that had been previously degraded by microbes over a 10-week period, losing 70% of its content in the process. This recalcitrant biomass was then used as the sole carbon source in a shake-flask culture inoculated with saltmarsh sediment. Cultures were grown for 8 weeks and then analysed using meta-omic approaches. Meta-genomics were used to investigate the microbial community present in the final recalcitrant biomass, while combined meta-proteomics and meta-transcriptomics were used to identify putative CAZymes (Carbohydrate active enzymes). Candidate enzymes have been cloned, heterologous expressed in E. coli and characterized according to their salt tolerance. List of contents List of contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................ 2 List of contents .................................................................................................................................. 3 List of tables ...................................................................................................................................... 6 List of figures ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................. 9 Declaration ...................................................................................................................................... 11 Chapter 1 General introduction ....................................................................................................... 12 1.1 Lignocellulose biomass........................................................................................................... 12 1.2 What makes lignocellulose biomass difficult to digest? ........................................................... 12 1.2.1 Cellulose.......................................................................................................................... 13 1.2.2 Hemicellulose .................................................................................................................. 14 1.2.3 Lignin .............................................................................................................................. 18 1.2.4 Pectins ............................................................................................................................ 19 1.3 CAZymes ................................................................................................................................ 21 1.3.1 Enzymatic cellulose degradation ...................................................................................... 22 1.3.2 Enzymatic hemicellulose degradation .............................................................................. 24 1.4 Challenges for the use of seawater in biorefineries ................................................................. 27 1.5 Saltmarshes are source of salt tolerant enzymes ..................................................................... 30 1.6 Aims of this project ................................................................................................................ 30 Chapter 2 Materials and Methods ................................................................................................... 32 2.1 Chemicals and reagents.................................................................................................... 32 2.2 Production of recalcitrant biomass ................................................................................... 32 2.2.1 Initial recalcitrant biomass production ...................................................................... 32 2.2.2 Final recalcitrant biomass and weight loss ................................................................. 32 2.3 Biomass composition analysis .......................................................................................... 33 2.3.1 Lignin content ........................................................................................................... 33 2.3.2 Hemicellulose content .............................................................................................. 33 2.3.3 Crystalline cellulose content...................................................................................... 34 2.4 Meta-“omics” approaches ................................................................................................ 34 2.4.1 Combined genomic DNA (gDNA) and total RNA extraction ......................................... 34 2.4.2 DNA preparation for meta-genomics and DNA sequencing ........................................ 35 2.4.3 Bioinformatic analysis and microbial community profile pipeline ............................... 39 2.4.4 RNA preparation for meta-transcriptomics and RNA sequencing ............................... 41 2.4.5 Protein extraction and extracellular protein purification ............................................ 43 3 List of contents 2.4.6 Proteomic analysis .................................................................................................... 45 2.5 Molecular Biology techniques .......................................................................................... 46 2.5.1 Host organisms for cloning and protein expression .................................................... 46 2.5.2 Media ....................................................................................................................... 47 2.5.3 Polymerase Chain reaction (PCR)............................................................................... 48 2.5.4 Agarose gel electrophoresis ...................................................................................... 53 2.5.5 DNA purification ....................................................................................................... 54 2.5.6 Gene cloning using StrataClone technology ............................................................... 54 2.5.7 Colony screening by colony PCR ................................................................................ 56 2.5.8 Plasmid DNA extraction and Sanger sequencing ........................................................ 57 2.5.9 Nucleic acid quantification ........................................................................................ 57 2.5.10 DNA sequencing (Sanger sequencing) ....................................................................... 57 2.5.11 Subcloning into the expression vector pet52b+ using In-Fusion HD cloning ................ 58 2.6 Recombinant protein expression ...................................................................................... 61 2.6.1 Competent cells transformation ................................................................................ 61 2.6.2 Bacterial protein expression ...................................................................................... 61 2.6.3 Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate Poly Acrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) ............... 62 2.6.4 Western Blot (WB) analysis ....................................................................................... 63 2.6.5 Protein quantification by Bradford ............................................................................ 63 2.7 Protein purification .......................................................................................................... 64 2.7.1 Affinity chromatography ........................................................................................... 64 2.7.2 Protein concentration ............................................................................................... 64 2.7.3 Gel filtration chromatography ................................................................................... 64 2.8 Characterization of soluble targets ..................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Updating the Taxonomic Toolbox: Classification of Alteromonas Spp
    1 Updating the taxonomic toolbox: classification of Alteromonas spp. 2 using Multilocus Phylogenetic Analysis and MALDI-TOF Mass 3 Spectrometry a a a 4 Hooi Jun Ng , Hayden K. Webb , Russell J. Crawford , François a b b c 5 Malherbe , Henry Butt , Rachel Knight , Valery V. Mikhailov and a, 6 Elena P. Ivanova * 7 aFaculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, 8 PO Box 218, Hawthorn, Vic 3122, Australia 9 bBioscreen, Bio21 Institute, The University of Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia 10 cG.B. Elyakov Pacific Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Far Eastern Branch, Russian 11 Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok 690022, Russian Federation 12 13 *Corresponding author: Tel: +61-3-9214-5137. Fax: +61-3-9214-5050. 14 E-mail: [email protected] 15 16 Abstract 17 Bacteria of the genus Alteromonas are Gram-negative, strictly aerobic, motile, 18 heterotrophic marine bacteria, known for their versatile metabolic activities. 19 Identification and classification of novel species belonging to the genus Alteromonas 20 generally involves DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH) as distinct species often fail to be 1 21 resolved at the 97% threshold value of the 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity. In this 22 study, the applicability of Multilocus Phylogenetic Analysis (MLPA) and Matrix- 23 Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF 24 MS) for the differentiation of Alteromonas species has been evaluated. Phylogenetic 25 analysis incorporating five house-keeping genes (dnaK, sucC, rpoB, gyrB, and rpoD) 26 revealed a threshold value of 98.9% that could be considered as the species cut-off 27 value for the delineation of Alteromonas spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Motiliproteus Sediminis Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., Isolated from Coastal Sediment
    Antonie van Leeuwenhoek (2014) 106:615–621 DOI 10.1007/s10482-014-0232-2 ORIGINAL PAPER Motiliproteus sediminis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from coastal sediment Zong-Jie Wang • Zhi-Hong Xie • Chao Wang • Zong-Jun Du • Guan-Jun Chen Received: 3 April 2014 / Accepted: 4 July 2014 / Published online: 20 July 2014 Ó Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 Abstract A novel Gram-stain-negative, rod-to- demonstrated that the novel isolate was 93.3 % similar spiral-shaped, oxidase- and catalase- positive and to the type strain of Neptunomonas antarctica, 93.2 % facultatively aerobic bacterium, designated HS6T, was to Neptunomonas japonicum and 93.1 % to Marino- isolated from marine sediment of Yellow Sea, China. bacterium rhizophilum, the closest cultivated rela- It can reduce nitrate to nitrite and grow well in marine tives. The polar lipid profile of the novel strain broth 2216 (MB, Hope Biol-Technology Co., Ltd) consisted of phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidyl- with an optimal temperature for growth of 30–33 °C glycerol and some other unknown lipids. Major (range 12–45 °C) and in the presence of 2–3 % (w/v) cellular fatty acids were summed feature 3 (C16:1 NaCl (range 0.5–7 %, w/v). The pH range for growth x7c/iso-C15:0 2-OH), C18:1 x7c and C16:0 and the main was pH 6.2–9.0, with an optimum at 6.5–7.0. Phylo- respiratory quinone was Q-8. The DNA G?C content genetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences of strain HS6T was 61.2 mol %. Based on the phylogenetic, physiological and biochemical charac- teristics, strain HS6T represents a novel genus and The GenBank accession number for the 16S rRNA gene T species and the name Motiliproteus sediminis gen.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Information for Microbial Electrochemical Systems Outperform Fixed-Bed Biofilters for Cleaning-Up Urban Wastewater
    Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016 Supplementary information for Microbial Electrochemical Systems outperform fixed-bed biofilters for cleaning-up urban wastewater AUTHORS: Arantxa Aguirre-Sierraa, Tristano Bacchetti De Gregorisb, Antonio Berná, Juan José Salasc, Carlos Aragónc, Abraham Esteve-Núñezab* Fig.1S Total nitrogen (A), ammonia (B) and nitrate (C) influent and effluent average values of the coke and the gravel biofilters. Error bars represent 95% confidence interval. Fig. 2S Influent and effluent COD (A) and BOD5 (B) average values of the hybrid biofilter and the hybrid polarized biofilter. Error bars represent 95% confidence interval. Fig. 3S Redox potential measured in the coke and the gravel biofilters Fig. 4S Rarefaction curves calculated for each sample based on the OTU computations. Fig. 5S Correspondence analysis biplot of classes’ distribution from pyrosequencing analysis. Fig. 6S. Relative abundance of classes of the category ‘other’ at class level. Table 1S Influent pre-treated wastewater and effluents characteristics. Averages ± SD HRT (d) 4.0 3.4 1.7 0.8 0.5 Influent COD (mg L-1) 246 ± 114 330 ± 107 457 ± 92 318 ± 143 393 ± 101 -1 BOD5 (mg L ) 136 ± 86 235 ± 36 268 ± 81 176 ± 127 213 ± 112 TN (mg L-1) 45.0 ± 17.4 60.6 ± 7.5 57.7 ± 3.9 43.7 ± 16.5 54.8 ± 10.1 -1 NH4-N (mg L ) 32.7 ± 18.7 51.6 ± 6.5 49.0 ± 2.3 36.6 ± 15.9 47.0 ± 8.8 -1 NO3-N (mg L ) 2.3 ± 3.6 1.0 ± 1.6 0.8 ± 0.6 1.5 ± 2.0 0.9 ± 0.6 TP (mg
    [Show full text]
  • D 3111 Suppl
    The following supplement accompanies the article Fine-scale transition to lower bacterial diversity and altered community composition precedes shell disease in laboratory-reared juvenile American lobster Sarah G. Feinman, Andrea Unzueta Martínez, Jennifer L. Bowen, Michael F. Tlusty* *Corresponding author: [email protected] Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 124: 41–54 (2017) Figure S1. Principal coordinates analysis of bacterial communities on lobster shell samples taken on different days. Principal coordinates analysis of the weighted UniFrac metric comparing bacterial community composition of diseased lobster shell on different days of sampling. Diseased lobster shell includes samples collected from the site of disease (square), as well as 0.5 cm (circle), 1 cm (triangle), and 1.5 cm (diamond) away from the site of the disease, while colors depict different days of sampling. Note that by day four, two of the lobsters had molted, hence there are fewer red symbols 1 Figure S2. Rank relative abundance curve for the 200+ most abundant OTUs for each shell condition. The number of OTUs, their abundance, and their order varies for each bar graph based on the relative abundance of each OTU in that shell condition. Please note the difference in scale along the y-axis for each bar graph. Bars appear in color if the OTU is a part of the core microbiome of that shell condition or appear in black if the OTU is not a part of the core microbiome of that shell condition. Dotted lines indicate OTUs that are part of the “abundant microbiome,” i.e. those whose cumulative total is ~50%, as well as OTUs that are a part of the “rare microbiome,” i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Alishewanella Jeotgali Sp. Nov., Isolated from Traditional Fermented Food, and Emended Description of the Genus Alishewanella
    International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (2009), 59, 2313–2316 DOI 10.1099/ijs.0.007260-0 Alishewanella jeotgali sp. nov., isolated from traditional fermented food, and emended description of the genus Alishewanella Min-Soo Kim,1,2 Seong Woon Roh,1,2 Young-Do Nam,1,2 Ho-Won Chang,1 Kyoung-Ho Kim,1 Mi-Ja Jung,1 Jung-Hye Choi,1 Eun-Jin Park1 and Jin-Woo Bae1,2 Correspondence 1Department of Life and Nanopharmaceutical Sciences and Department of Biology, Kyung Hee Jin-Woo Bae University, Seoul 130-701, Republic of Korea [email protected] 2University of Science and Technology, Biological Resources Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon 305-806, Republic of Korea A novel Gram-negative and facultative anaerobic strain, designated MS1T, was isolated from gajami sikhae, a traditional fermented food in Korea made from flatfish. Strain MS1T was motile, rod-shaped and oxidase- and catalase-positive, and required 1–2 % (w/v) NaCl for growth. Growth occurred at temperatures ranging from 4 to 40 6C and the pH range for optimal growth was pH 6.5–9.0. Strain MS1T was capable of reducing trimethylamine oxide, nitrate and thiosulfate. Phylogenetic analysis placed strain MS1T within the genus Alishewanella. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that strain MS1T was related closely to Alishewanella aestuarii B11T (98.67 % similarity) and Alishewanella fetalis CCUG 30811T (98.04 % similarity). However, DNA–DNA reassociation experiments between strain MS1T and reference strains showed relatedness values ,70 % (42.6 and 14.8 % with A.
    [Show full text]
  • Thalassomonas Agarivorans Sp. Nov., a Marine Agarolytic Bacterium Isolated from Shallow Coastal Water of An-Ping Harbour, Taiwan
    International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (2006), 56, 1245–1250 DOI 10.1099/ijs.0.64130-0 Thalassomonas agarivorans sp. nov., a marine agarolytic bacterium isolated from shallow coastal water of An-Ping Harbour, Taiwan, and emended description of the genus Thalassomonas Wen Dar Jean,1 Wung Yang Shieh2 and Tung Yen Liu2 Correspondence 1Center for General Education, Leader University, No. 188, Sec. 5, An-Chung Rd, Tainan, Wung Yang Shieh Taiwan [email protected] 2Institute of Oceanography, National Taiwan University, PO Box 23-13, Taipei, Taiwan A marine agarolytic bacterium, designated strain TMA1T, was isolated from a seawater sample collected in a shallow-water region of An-Ping Harbour, Taiwan. It was non-fermentative and Gram-negative. Cells grown in broth cultures were straight or curved rods, non-motile and non-flagellated. The isolate required NaCl for growth and exhibited optimal growth at 25 6C and 3 % NaCl. It grew aerobically and was incapable of anaerobic growth by fermenting glucose or other carbohydrates. Predominant cellular fatty acids were C16 : 0 (17?5 %), C17 : 1v8c (12?8 %), C17 : 0 (11?1 %), C15 : 0 iso 2-OH/C16 : 1v7c (8?6 %) and C13 : 0 (7?3 %). The DNA G+C content was 41?0 mol%. Phylogenetic, phenotypic and chemotaxonomic data accumulated in this study revealed that the isolate could be classified in a novel species of the genus Thalassomonas in the family Colwelliaceae. The name Thalassomonas agarivorans sp. nov. is proposed for the novel species, with TMA1T (=BCRC 17492T=JCM 13379T) as the type strain. Alteromonas-like bacteria in the class Gammaproteobacteria however, they are not exclusively autochthonous in the comprise a large group of marine, heterotrophic, polar- marine environment, since some reports have shown that flagellated, Gram-negative rods that are mainly non- they also occur in freshwater, sewage and soil (Agbo & Moss, fermentative aerobes.
    [Show full text]
  • Colwellia and Marinobacter Metapangenomes Reveal Species
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.28.317438; this version posted September 28, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Colwellia and Marinobacter metapangenomes reveal species-specific responses to oil 2 and dispersant exposure in deepsea microbial communities 3 4 Tito David Peña-Montenegro1,2,3, Sara Kleindienst4, Andrew E. Allen5,6, A. Murat 5 Eren7,8, John P. McCrow5, Juan David Sánchez-Calderón3, Jonathan Arnold2,9, Samantha 6 B. Joye1,* 7 8 Running title: Metapangenomes reveal species-specific responses 9 10 1 Department of Marine Sciences, University of Georgia, 325 Sanford Dr., Athens, 11 Georgia 30602-3636, USA 12 13 2 Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, 120 Green St., Athens, Georgia 14 30602-7229, USA 15 16 3 Grupo de Investigación en Gestión Ecológica y Agroindustrial (GEA), Programa de 17 Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Libre, Seccional 18 Barranquilla, Colombia 19 20 4 Microbial Ecology, Center for Applied Geosciences, University of Tübingen, 21 Schnarrenbergstrasse 94-96, 72076 Tübingen, Germany 22 23 5 Microbial and Environmental Genomics, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, 24 USA 25 26 6 Integrative Oceanography Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UC San 27 Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA 28 29 7 Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA 30 31 8 Josephine Bay Paul Center, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA, USA 32 33 9Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, 120 Green St., Athens, Georgia 30602- 34 7223, USA 35 36 *Correspondence: Samantha B.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Free Radical Scavenging Probiotic to Mitigate Coral Bleaching
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.02.185645; this version posted July 3, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 Title: Development of a free radical scavenging probiotic to mitigate coral bleaching 2 Running title: Making a probiotic to mitigate coral bleaching 3 4 Ashley M. Dungana#, Dieter Bulachb, Heyu Linc, Madeleine J. H. van Oppena,d, Linda L. Blackalla 5 6 aSchool of Biosciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia 7 bMelbourne Bioinformatics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia 8 c School of Earth Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia 9 dAustralian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, QLD, Australia 10 11 12 #Address correspondence to Ashley M. Dungan, [email protected] 13 14 Abstract word count: 216 15 Text word count: 16 17 Keywords: symbiosis, Exaiptasia diaphana, Exaiptasia pallida, probiotic, antioxidant, ROS, 18 Symbiodiniaceae, bacteria 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.02.185645; this version posted July 3, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 19 ABSTRACT 20 Corals are colonized by symbiotic microorganisms that exert a profound influence on the 21 animal’s health.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Drivers of Bacterial Community Assembly in Synthetic Phycospheres
    Ecological drivers of bacterial community assembly in synthetic phycospheres He Fua, Mario Uchimiyaa,b, Jeff Gorec, and Mary Ann Morana,1 aDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602; bComplex Carbohydrate Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602; and cDepartment of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 Edited by Edward F. DeLong, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, and approved January 6, 2020 (received for review October 3, 2019) In the nutrient-rich region surrounding marine phytoplankton The ecological mechanisms that influence the assembly of cells, heterotrophic bacterioplankton transform a major fraction of phycosphere microbiomes are not well understood, however, in recently fixed carbon through the uptake and catabolism of part because of the micrometer scale at which bacterial commu- phytoplankton metabolites. We sought to understand the rules by nities congregate. It remains unclear whether simple rules exist which marine bacterial communities assemble in these nutrient- that could predict the composition of these communities. enhanced phycospheres, specifically addressing the role of host Phycospheres are short-lived in the ocean, constrained by the resources in driving community coalescence. Synthetic systems with 1- to 2-d average life span of phytoplankton cells (20, 21). The varying combinations of known exometabolites of marine phyto- phycosphere bacterial communities must therefore form and dis- plankton were inoculated with seawater bacterial assemblages, and perse rapidly within a highly dynamic metabolite landscape (14). communities were transferred daily to mimic the average duration We hypothesized a simple rule for assembly in metabolically di- of natural phycospheres. We found that bacterial community verse phycospheres in which communities congregate as the sum assembly was predictable from linear combinations of the taxa of discrete metabolite guilds (22).
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Genomic Sequence of a Chromate- and Sulfate-Reducing
    Xia et al. Standards in Genomic Sciences (2016) 11:48 DOI 10.1186/s40793-016-0169-3 SHORT GENOME REPORT Open Access Draft genomic sequence of a chromate- and sulfate-reducing Alishewanella strain with the ability to bioremediate Cr and Cd contamination Xian Xia1, Jiahong Li1, Shuijiao Liao1,2, Gaoting Zhou1,2, Hui Wang1, Liqiong Li1, Biao Xu1 and Gejiao Wang1* Abstract Alishewanella sp. WH16-1 (= CCTCC M201507) is a facultative anaerobic, motile, Gram-negative, rod-shaped bacterium isolated from soil of a copper and iron mine. This strain efficiently reduces chromate (Cr6+) to the much 3+ 2− 2− 2− 2+ less toxic Cr . In addition, it reduces sulfate (SO4 )toS . The S could react with Cd to generate precipitated CdS. Thus, strain WH16-1 shows a great potential to bioremediate Cr and Cd contaimination. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the draft genome and comparative genomic results among strain WH16-1 and other Alishewanella strains. The genome comprises 3,488,867 bp, 50.4 % G + C content, 3,132 protein-coding genes and 80 RNA genes. Both putative chromate- and sulfate-reducing genes are identified. Keywords: Alishewanella, Chromate-reducing bacterium, Sulfate-reducing bacterium, Cadmium, Chromium Abbreviation: PGAP, Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline Introduction Alishewanella sp. WH16-1 was isolated from mining The genus Alishewanella was established by Vogel et al., soil in 2009. This strain could resist to multiple heavy in 2000 with Alishewanella fetalis as the type species. It metals. During cultivation, it could efficiently reduce the belongs to the family Alteromonadaceae of the class toxic chromate (Cr6+) to the much less toxic and less 3+ 2− Gammaproteobacteria [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Cultivation-Based Quantification and Identification of Bacteria at Two
    microorganisms Communication Cultivation-Based Quantification and Identification of Bacteria at Two Hygienic Key Sides of Domestic Washing Machines Susanne Jacksch 1,2 , Huzefa Zohra 1, Mirko Weide 3, Sylvia Schnell 2 and Markus Egert 1,* 1 Faculty of Medical and Life Sciences, Institute of Precision Medicine, Microbiology and Hygiene Group, Furtwangen University, 78054 Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany; [email protected] (S.J.); [email protected] (H.Z.) 2 Research Centre for BioSystems, Land Use, and Nutrition (IFZ), Institute of Applied Microbiology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany; [email protected] 3 International Research & Development–Laundry & Home Care, Henkel AG & Co. KGaA, 40191 Düsseldorf, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-(7720)-307-4554; Fax: +49-(7720)-307-4207 Abstract: Detergent drawer and door seal represent important sites for microbial life in domes- tic washing machines. Interestingly, quantitative data on the microbial contamination of these sites is scarce. Here, 10 domestic washing machines were swab-sampled for subsequent bacte- rial cultivation at four different sampling sites: detergent drawer and detergent drawer chamber, as well as the top and bottom part of the rubber door seal. The average bacterial load over all washing machines and sites was 2.1 ± 1.0 × 104 CFU cm−2 (average number of colony forming units ± standard error of the mean (SEM)). The top part of the door seal showed the lowest contami- 1 −2 nation (11.1 ± 9.2 × 10 CFU cm ), probably due to less humidity. Out of 212 isolates, 178 (84%) were identified on the genus level, and 118 (56%) on the species level using matrix-assisted laser Citation: Jacksch, S.; Zohra, H.; desorption/ionization (MALDI) Biotyping, resulting in 29 genera and 40 identified species across all Weide, M.; Schnell, S.; Egert, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Isolation and Characterization of a Novel Agar-Degrading Marine Bacterium, Gayadomonas Joobiniege Gen, Nov, Sp
    J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. (2013), 23(11), 1509–1518 http://dx.doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1308.08007 Research Article jmb Isolation and Characterization of a Novel Agar-Degrading Marine Bacterium, Gayadomonas joobiniege gen, nov, sp. nov., from the Southern Sea, Korea Won-Jae Chi1, Jae-Seon Park1, Min-Jung Kwak2, Jihyun F. Kim3, Yong-Keun Chang4, and Soon-Kwang Hong1* 1Division of Biological Science and Bioinformatics, Myongji University, Yongin 449-728, Republic of Korea 2Biosystems and Bioengineering Program, University of Science and Technology, Daejeon 305-350, Republic of Korea 3Department of Systems Biology, Yonsei University, Seoul 120-749, Republic of Korea 4Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon 305-701, Republic of Korea Received: August 2, 2013 Revised: August 14, 2013 An agar-degrading bacterium, designated as strain G7T, was isolated from a coastal seawater Accepted: August 20, 2013 sample from Gaya Island (Gayado in Korean), Republic of Korea. The isolated strain G7T is gram-negative, rod shaped, aerobic, non-motile, and non-pigmented. A similarity search based on its 16S rRNA gene sequence revealed that it shares 95.5%, 90.6%, and 90.0% T First published online similarity with the 16S rRNA gene sequences of Catenovulum agarivorans YM01, Algicola August 22, 2013 sagamiensis, and Bowmanella pacifica W3-3AT, respectively. Phylogenetic analyses demonstrated T *Corresponding author that strain G7 formed a distinct monophyletic clade closely related to species of the family Phone: +82-31-330-6198; Alteromonadaceae in the Alteromonas-like Gammaproteobacteria. The G+C content of strain Fax: +82-31-335-8249; G7T was 41.12 mol%.
    [Show full text]