Yale Law School 2018–2019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Yale Law School 2018–2019 BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY BULLETIN OF YALE BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Periodicals postage paid New Haven ct 06520-8227 New Haven, Connecticut Yale Law School 2018–2019 Yale Law School Yale 2018–2019 BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Series 114 Number 10 August 10, 2018 BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Series 114 Number 10 August 10, 2018 (USPS 078-500) The University is committed to basing judgments concerning the admission, education, is published seventeen times a year (one time in May and October; three times in June and employment of individuals upon their qualifications and abilities and a∞rmatively and September; four times in July; five times in August) by Yale University, 2 Whitney seeks to attract to its faculty, sta≠, and student body qualified persons of diverse back- Avenue, New Haven CT 06510. Periodicals postage paid at New Haven, Connecticut. grounds. In accordance with this policy and as delineated by federal and Connecticut law, Yale does not discriminate in admissions, educational programs, or employment against Postmaster: Send address changes to Bulletin of Yale University, any individual on account of that individual’s sex, race, color, religion, age, disability, PO Box 208227, New Haven CT 06520-8227 status as a protected veteran, or national or ethnic origin; nor does Yale discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity or expression. Managing Editor: Kimberly M. Go≠-Crews University policy is committed to a∞rmative action under law in employment of Editor: Lesley K. Baier women, minority group members, individuals with disabilities, and protected veterans. PO Box 208230, New Haven CT 06520-8230 Inquiries concerning these policies may be referred to Valarie Stanley, Director of the O∞ce for Equal Opportunity Programs, 221 Whitney Avenue, 4th Floor, 203.432.0849. The closing date for material in this bulletin was August 5, 2018. For additional information, see www.yale.edu/equalopportunity. The University reserves the right to withdraw or modify the courses of instruction or to change the instructors at any time. Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 protects people from sex discrimination in educational programs and activities at institutions that receive federal financial assistance. ©2018 by Yale University. All rights reserved. The material in this bulletin may not Questions regarding Title IX may be referred to the University’s Title IX Coordinator, be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form, whether in print or electronic media, Stephanie Spangler, at 203.432.4446 or at [email protected], or to the U.S. Department without written permission from Yale University. of Education, O∞ce for Civil Rights, 8th Floor, 5 Post O∞ce Square, Boston MA 02109- 3921; tel. 617.289.0111, fax 617.289.0150, TDD 800.877.8339, or [email protected]. Inquiries Requests for catalogues and J.D. application material should be made through the In accordance with federal and state law, the University maintains information on secu- Law School website (http://law.yale.edu); or by mail to the Director of Admissions, Yale rity policies and procedures and prepares an annual campus security and fire safety report Law School, PO Box 208215, New Haven CT 06520-8215; or by telephone, 203.432.4995. containing three years’ worth of campus crime statistics and security policy statements, fire safety information, and a description of where students, faculty, and sta≠ should go Requests for LL.M., M.S.L., J.S.D., and Visiting Researcher information and/or applica- to report crimes. The fire safety section of the annual report contains information on tion materials should be addressed to the Graduate Programs O∞ce, Yale Law School, PO current fire safety practices and any fires that occurred within on-campus student hous- Box 208215, New Haven CT 06520-8215; telephone, 203.432.1696; e-mail, gradpro.law@ ing facilities. Upon request to the O∞ce of the Vice President for Human Resources and yale.edu; or materials can be accessed at the Law School website (http://law.yale.edu). Administration, PO Box 208322, 2 Whitney Avenue, Suite 810, New Haven CT 06520- 8322, 203.432.8049, the University will provide this information to any applicant for The Yale Law School Bulletin is primarily a digital publication, available in html and admission, or prospective students and employees may visit http://publicsafety.yale.edu. pdf at http://bulletin.yale.edu. A limited number of copies were printed on 50% post- consumer recycled paper for Yale Law School and the permanent archive of the Bulletin In accordance with federal law, the University prepares an annual report on participation of Yale University. Individual copies may also be purchased on a print-on-demand basis; rates, financial support, and other information regarding men’s and women’s intercol- please contact Yale Printing and Publishing Services, 203.432.6560. legiate athletic programs. Upon request to the Director of Athletics, PO Box 208216, New Haven CT 06520-8216, 203.432.1414, the University will provide its annual report to any student or prospective student. The Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act (EADA) report is also available online at http://ope.ed.gov/athletics. Yale Law School 2018–2019 BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Series 114 Number 10 August 10, 2018 Contents Calendar 5 The President and Fellows of Yale University 6 The O∞cers of Yale University 7 Yale Law School Administration and Faculty 8 A Message from the Dean 18 The Study of Law at Yale University 19 Course O≠erings 22 2018 Fall Term 22 2019 Spring Term 28 Lecture Programs and Other Academic Opportunities 36 Lecture Programs 36 Special Initiatives 38 Collaboration for Research Integrity and Transparency 38 Global Health Justice Partnership 38 The Gruber Program for Global Justice and Women’s Rights at Yale Law School 39 The Information Society Project 39 The Justice Collaboratory 40 Abdallah S. Kamel Center for the Study of Islamic Law and Civilization 40 The Arthur Liman Center for Public Interest Law 40 Middle East Legal Studies Seminar 41 The John M. Olin Center for Studies in Law, Economics, and Public Policy 41 The Orville H. Schell, Jr. Center for International Human Rights 41 The Solomon Center for Health Law and Policy at Yale Law School 42 The Paul Tsai China Center 42 The Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy 43 The Yale Center for Law and Philosophy 43 The Yale Law School Center for Global Legal Challenges 44 The Yale Law School Center for the Study of Corporate Law 44 The Yale Law School Center for Private Law 45 Yale Law School Latin American Legal Studies 45 Opportunities for Study in Legal History 46 Visiting Researchers 46 Fellowships for Postgraduate Research 47 Rules of Discipline 48 Academic Requirements and Options 55 Registration 55 Course Selection 55 Limited Enrollment 55 Credit/Fail Units 56 Examinations and Papers 56 Grades for All Degree Students 57 Calculation of Course Credit Units 57 4 Yale Law School 2018–2019 Requirements for the Degree of Juris Doctor (J.D.) 58 Options within the Course of Study for the Degree of Juris Doctor (J.D.) 62 Clinical Programs 62 Joint Degrees 66 Leaves of Absence and Readmission, Extending Time for Completion of Degree, and Credit for Work Done at Another Law School 68 Bar Requirements 71 Requirements for Graduate Degrees (Ph.D., J.S.D., LL.M., M.S.L.) 71 Freedom of Expression 75 Admissions, Expenses, and Financial Aid 76 The Degree of Juris Doctor (J.D.) 76 The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Law (Ph.D.) 83 The Degrees of Doctor of the Science of Law (J.S.D.) and Master of Laws (LL.M.) 83 The Degree of Master of Studies in Law (M.S.L.) 85 Student Organizations and Journals, and Student Participation in Administration 87 Student Organizations and Journals 87 Student Participation in Administration 92 Student Feedback Regarding ABA Standards 93 Career Development O∞ce 94 Lillian Goldman Law Library 96 Life at Yale Law School 98 Yale University Resources and Services 100 Law School Students 112 Alumni and Endowment Funds 119 Alumni 119 Endowment Funds 120 The Work of Yale University 158 Campus Map 162 Calendar Fall 2018 Aug. 20–24 M–F Orientation for all new students Aug. 22 W Registration for all new students Aug. 27 M Registration for all returning students Fall term begins, 8:10 a.m. Classes begin, 8:10 a.m. Aug. 28 T Add/drop period begins, 8:30 a.m. Sept. 3 M Labor Day; classes do not meet Sept. 5 W Add/drop period ends, 4:30 p.m. Oct. 4 TH Fall recess begins, 9 p.m. Oct. 5–8 F–M Fall recess; classes do not meet Oct. 9 T Classes resume, 8:10 a.m. Nov. 16 F Thanksgiving recess begins, 6 p.m. Nov. 26 M Classes resume, 8:10 a.m. Dec. 4 T Only Monday classes meet Dec. 5 W Only Friday classes meet Classes end, 12 p.m. Reading period begins, 12 p.m. Dec. 10 M Examination period begins, 8:30 a.m. Dec. 19 W Examination period ends Fall term ends, 5 p.m. Winter recess begins Spring 2019 Jan. 14 M Spring term begins, 8:10 a.m. Registration for all students Classes begin, 8:10 a.m. Jan. 15 T Add/drop period begins, 8:30 a.m. Jan. 21 M Martin Luther King, Jr. Day; classes do not meet Jan. 23 W Add/drop period ends, 4:30 p.m. Mar. 8 F Spring recess begins, 6 p.m. Mar. 18 M Spring recess ends Classes resume, 8:10 a.m. Apr. 22 M Classes end, 9 p.m.
Recommended publications
  • Yale Law School 2010–2011
    BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Periodicals postage paid New Haven ct 06520-8227 New Haven, Connecticut Yale Law School 2010–2011 Yale Law School Yale 2010–2011 BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Series 106 Number 10 August 10, 2010 BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Series 106 Number 10 August 10, 2010 (USPS 078-500) The University is committed to basing judgments concerning the admission, education, is published seventeen times a year (one time in May and October; three times in June and employment of individuals upon their qualifications and abilities and a∞rmatively and September; four times in July; five times in August) by Yale University, 2 Whitney seeks to attract to its faculty, sta≠, and student body qualified persons of diverse back- Avenue, New Haven CT 0651o. Periodicals postage paid at New Haven, Connecticut. grounds. In accordance with this policy and as delineated by federal and Connecticut law, Yale does not discriminate in admissions, educational programs, or employment against Postmaster: Send address changes to Bulletin of Yale University, any individual on account of that individual’s sex, race, color, religion, age, disability, PO Box 208227, New Haven CT 06520-8227 status as a special disabled veteran, veteran of the Vietnam era, or other covered veteran, or national or ethnic origin; nor does Yale discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation Managing Editor: Linda Koch Lorimer or gender identity or expression. Editor: Lesley K. Baier University policy is committed to a∞rmative action under law in employment of PO Box 208230, New Haven CT 06520-8230 women, minority group members, individuals with disabilities, special disabled veterans, veterans of the Vietnam era, and other covered veterans.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazon's Antitrust Paradox
    LINA M. KHAN Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox abstract. Amazon is the titan of twenty-first century commerce. In addition to being a re- tailer, it is now a marketing platform, a delivery and logistics network, a payment service, a credit lender, an auction house, a major book publisher, a producer of television and films, a fashion designer, a hardware manufacturer, and a leading host of cloud server space. Although Amazon has clocked staggering growth, it generates meager profits, choosing to price below-cost and ex- pand widely instead. Through this strategy, the company has positioned itself at the center of e- commerce and now serves as essential infrastructure for a host of other businesses that depend upon it. Elements of the firm’s structure and conduct pose anticompetitive concerns—yet it has escaped antitrust scrutiny. This Note argues that the current framework in antitrust—specifically its pegging competi- tion to “consumer welfare,” defined as short-term price effects—is unequipped to capture the ar- chitecture of market power in the modern economy. We cannot cognize the potential harms to competition posed by Amazon’s dominance if we measure competition primarily through price and output. Specifically, current doctrine underappreciates the risk of predatory pricing and how integration across distinct business lines may prove anticompetitive. These concerns are height- ened in the context of online platforms for two reasons. First, the economics of platform markets create incentives for a company to pursue growth over profits, a strategy that investors have re- warded. Under these conditions, predatory pricing becomes highly rational—even as existing doctrine treats it as irrational and therefore implausible.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 NOAA Science Report National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration U.S
    2018 NOAA Science Report National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration U.S. Department of Commerce NOAA Technical Memorandum NOAA Research Council-001 2018 NOAA Science Report Harry Cikanek, Ned Cyr, Ming Ji, Gary Matlock, Steve Thur NOAA Silver Spring, Maryland February 2019 NATIONAL OCEANIC AND NOAA Research Council noaa ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION 2018 NOAA Science Report Harry Cikanek, Ned Cyr, Ming Ji, Gary Matlock, Steve Thur NOAA Silver Spring, Maryland February 2019 UNITED STATES NATIONAL OCEANIC National Oceanic and DEPARTMENT OF AND ATMOSPHERIC Atmospheric Administration COMMERCE ADMINISTRATION Research Council Wilbur Ross RDML Tim Gallaudet, Ph.D., Craig N. McLean Secretary USN Ret., Acting NOAA NOAA Research Council Chair Administrator Francisco Werner, Ph.D. NOAA Research Council Vice Chair NOTICE This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. The views and opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency or Contractor thereof. Neither the United States Government, nor Contractor, nor any of their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Mention of a commercial company or product does not constitute an endorsement by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Law-And-Political-Economy Framework: Beyond the Twentieth-Century Synthesis Abstract
    JEDEDIAH BRITTON- PURDY, DAVID SINGH GREWAL, AMY KAPCZYNSKI & K. SABEEL RAHMAN Building a Law-and-Political-Economy Framework: Beyond the Twentieth-Century Synthesis abstract. We live in a time of interrelated crises. Economic inequality and precarity, and crises of democracy, climate change, and more raise significant challenges for legal scholarship and thought. “Neoliberal” premises undergird many fields of law and have helped authorize policies and practices that reaffirm the inequities of the current era. In particular, market efficiency, neu- trality, and formal equality have rendered key kinds of power invisible, and generated a skepticism of democratic politics. The result of these presumptions is what we call the “Twentieth-Century Synthesis”: a pervasive view of law that encases “the market” from claims of justice and conceals it from analyses of power. This Feature offers a framework for identifying and critiquing the Twentieth-Century Syn- thesis. This is also a framework for a new “law-and-political-economy approach” to legal scholar- ship. We hope to help amplify and catalyze scholarship and pedagogy that place themes of power, equality, and democracy at the center of legal scholarship. authors. The authors are, respectively, William S. Beinecke Professor of Law at Columbia Law School; Professor of Law at Berkeley Law School; Professor of Law at Yale Law School; and Associate Professor of Law at Brooklyn Law School and President, Demos. They are cofounders of the Law & Political Economy Project. The authors thank Anne Alstott, Jack Balkin, Jessica Bulman- Pozen, Corinne Blalock, Angela Harris, Luke Herrine, Doug Kysar, Zach Liscow, Daniel Markovits, Bill Novak, Frank Pasquale, Robert Post, David Pozen, Aziz Rana, Kate Redburn, Reva Siegel, Talha Syed, John Witt, and the participants of the January 2019 Law and Political Economy Work- shop at Yale Law School for their comments on drafts at many stages of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • INDIANA LAW REVIEW [Vol
    . A Short History of Hearsay Reform, with Particular Reference to Hoffman v. Palmer, Eddie Morgan and Jerry Frank Michael Ariens* "Few historians, however, hold themselves out as fictionists." Jerome Frank, The Place ofthe Expert in a Democratic Society 1 True, no man can be wholly apart from his fellows. But, if each of us is a promontory, yet the promontory reaches out beyond the social mainland to a point where others cannot intrude. ... It is a no-other-man's land, for others can't penetrate it, can't communicate with it. Jerome Frank, Judge Learned Hand1 Introduction On my summer vacation, I chanced upon the novel Foe by the South African writer 3 J.M. Coetzee. Foe is a modern reworking of Daniel Defoe's Robinson Crusoe. In this modern retelling, Coetzee presents the story of the relation of author and subject, not the story of the adventures of a shipwrecked Englishman. In Foe, the authorial voice is that of Susan Barton, a castaway who ended up on the same island as Cruso and Friday. She, Cruso and Friday are "rescued" and taken by ship to England. En route, Cruso dies. Once in London, Susan Barton takes her story of Cruso and Friday to Daniel Foe, and finds that his interest is more in the story of her life and less in the story of Cruso 's adventures. Foe, chased by creditors, flees his house, into which Barton and Friday move. Barton later leaves, searching for Foe, whom she finally tracks down. Confronting Foe, 4 she says, "I am not a story, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Program of the Sessions San Diego, California, January 9–12, 2013
    Program of the Sessions San Diego, California, January 9–12, 2013 AMS Short Course on Random Matrices, Part Monday, January 7 I MAA Short Course on Conceptual Climate Models, Part I 9:00 AM –3:45PM Room 4, Upper Level, San Diego Convention Center 8:30 AM –5:30PM Room 5B, Upper Level, San Diego Convention Center Organizer: Van Vu,YaleUniversity Organizers: Esther Widiasih,University of Arizona 8:00AM Registration outside Room 5A, SDCC Mary Lou Zeeman,Bowdoin upper level. College 9:00AM Random Matrices: The Universality James Walsh, Oberlin (5) phenomenon for Wigner ensemble. College Preliminary report. 7:30AM Registration outside Room 5A, SDCC Terence Tao, University of California Los upper level. Angles 8:30AM Zero-dimensional energy balance models. 10:45AM Universality of random matrices and (1) Hans Kaper, Georgetown University (6) Dyson Brownian Motion. Preliminary 10:30AM Hands-on Session: Dynamics of energy report. (2) balance models, I. Laszlo Erdos, LMU, Munich Anna Barry*, Institute for Math and Its Applications, and Samantha 2:30PM Free probability and Random matrices. Oestreicher*, University of Minnesota (7) Preliminary report. Alice Guionnet, Massachusetts Institute 2:00PM One-dimensional energy balance models. of Technology (3) Hans Kaper, Georgetown University 4:00PM Hands-on Session: Dynamics of energy NSF-EHR Grant Proposal Writing Workshop (4) balance models, II. Anna Barry*, Institute for Math and Its Applications, and Samantha 3:00 PM –6:00PM Marina Ballroom Oestreicher*, University of Minnesota F, 3rd Floor, Marriott The time limit for each AMS contributed paper in the sessions meeting will be found in Volume 34, Issue 1 of Abstracts is ten minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(B) Is Unconstitutional
    SYMPOSIUM ARTICLE TWOMBLY IN CONTEXT: WHY FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(B) IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL E. Donald Elliott Abstract Rule 4(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure delegates to private parties state authority to compel a person to appear and answer civil charges in court without any preliminary state review or screening for reasonableness. This is argued to be unconstitutional as a unreasonable seizure of the person, a deprivation of private property without due process, and a standardless delegation of state power to a private party with a financial interest. The history of the writ of summons is reviewed. From the Founding until 1938, federal courts reviewed the grounds proposed for suit prior to service of a summons ordering someone to come to court to answer charges. It is argued that unless courts routinely award full economic costs after the fact to make someone whole who has been sued wrongfully, they must satisfy themselves in advance that there is a reasonable basis for suit before ordering the persons sued to appear and answer. Rule 4(b) is argued to be unconstitutional as (1) a seizure of the person and property of the defendant without any attempt by the state to verify that it is reasonable to do so; (2) an unconstitutional deprivation of property without due process of law; (3) an unconstitutional delegation of state power to issue a court order to a private party with a financial interest, and (4) an unconstitutional repeal of a statute providing for judicial control over process without following constitutionally required procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present
    CHAIRMEN OF SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–present INTRODUCTION The following is a list of chairmen of all standing Senate committees, as well as the chairmen of select and joint committees that were precursors to Senate committees. (Other special and select committees of the twentieth century appear in Table 5-4.) Current standing committees are highlighted in yellow. The names of chairmen were taken from the Congressional Directory from 1816–1991. Four standing committees were founded before 1816. They were the Joint Committee on ENROLLED BILLS (established 1789), the joint Committee on the LIBRARY (established 1806), the Committee to AUDIT AND CONTROL THE CONTINGENT EXPENSES OF THE SENATE (established 1807), and the Committee on ENGROSSED BILLS (established 1810). The names of the chairmen of these committees for the years before 1816 were taken from the Annals of Congress. This list also enumerates the dates of establishment and termination of each committee. These dates were taken from Walter Stubbs, Congressional Committees, 1789–1982: A Checklist (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1985). There were eleven committees for which the dates of existence listed in Congressional Committees, 1789–1982 did not match the dates the committees were listed in the Congressional Directory. The committees are: ENGROSSED BILLS, ENROLLED BILLS, EXAMINE THE SEVERAL BRANCHES OF THE CIVIL SERVICE, Joint Committee on the LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, LIBRARY, PENSIONS, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS, RETRENCHMENT, REVOLUTIONARY CLAIMS, ROADS AND CANALS, and the Select Committee to Revise the RULES of the Senate. For these committees, the dates are listed according to Congressional Committees, 1789– 1982, with a note next to the dates detailing the discrepancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Yale Law School 2019–2020
    BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY BULLETIN OF YALE BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Periodicals postage paid New Haven ct 06520-8227 New Haven, Connecticut Yale Law School 2019–2020 Yale Law School Yale 2019–2020 BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Series 115 Number 11 August 10, 2019 BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Series 115 Number 11 August 10, 2019 (USPS 078-500) The University is committed to basing judgments concerning the admission, education, is published seventeen times a year (one time in May and October; three times in June and employment of individuals upon their qualifications and abilities and a∞rmatively and September; four times in July; five times in August) by Yale University, 2 Whitney seeks to attract to its faculty, sta≠, and student body qualified persons of diverse Avenue, New Haven CT 06510. Periodicals postage paid at New Haven, Connecticut. backgrounds. In accordance with this policy and as delineated by federal and Connecticut law, Yale does not discriminate in admissions, educational programs, or employment Postmaster: Send address changes to Bulletin of Yale University, against any individual on account of that individual’s sex, race, color, religion, age, PO Box 208227, New Haven CT 06520-8227 disability, status as a protected veteran, or national or ethnic origin; nor does Yale discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity or expression. Managing Editor: Kimberly M. Go≠-Crews University policy is committed to a∞rmative action under law in employment of Editor: Lesley K. Baier women, minority group members, individuals with disabilities, and protected veterans. PO Box 208230, New Haven CT 06520-8230 Inquiries concerning these policies may be referred to Valarie Stanley, Director of the O∞ce for Equal Opportunity Programs, 221 Whitney Avenue, 4th Floor, 203.432.0849.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Charles E. Merriam Papers 1893-1957
    University of Chicago Library Guide to the Charles E. Merriam Papers 1893-1957 © 2006 University of Chicago Library Table of Contents Descriptive Summary 8 Information on Use 8 Access 8 Citation 8 Biographical Note 8 Scope Note 9 Related Resources 19 Subject Headings 19 INVENTORY 19 Series I: Personal Papers 19 Subseries 1: Miscellaneous 20 Subseries 2: Family Correspondence 21 Subseries 3: Autobiography 22 Subseries 4: Class notes taken by CEM as a student 22 Sub-subseries 1: American History 22 Sub-subseries 2: Economics and Sociology 23 Sub-subseries 3: Law Courses 23 Sub-subseries 4: Political Philosophy 24 Sub-subseries 5: Miscellaneous 24 Sub-subseries 6: Overseas Study 25 Sub-subseries 7: Documents 27 Series II: General Correspondence 27 Subseries 1: 1902-1908 29 Subseries 2: 1909-1919 31 Subseries 4: 1933-1943 69 Subseries 5: 1944-1952 89 Series III: Chicago Politics 104 Subseries 1: Early Chicago Politics 104 Subseries 2: Charter Conventions 105 Subseries 3: Election Campaigns (other than mayoral) 107 Subseries 4: City Council Service 1900-1917 110 Subseries 5: City Council Committees 111 Subseries 6: Chicago Commission on City Expenditures 111 Subseries 7: Preliminary Reports 112 Subseries 8: Newspaper Clippings on Scandals and Investigations 113 Subseries 9: Transcripts of Testimony Before the Commission 114 Subseries 10: Crime Committee 114 Subseries 11: Politics in the 1920s 115 Subseries 12: Chicago Politics in the 1930s 117 Sub-subseries 1: Election Campaign of 1930 117 Sub-subseries 2: Election Campaign of 1931 117 Sub-subseries 4: Administration of Mayor Cermak 117 Sub-subseries 5: Administration of Mayor Kelly 118 Subseries 13: Chicago Politics in the 1940s 120 Subseries 14: The Charles S.
    [Show full text]
  • Academic All-America All-Time List
    Academic All-America All-Time List Year Sport Name Team Position Abilene Christian University 1963 Football Jack Griggs ‐‐‐ LB 1970 Football Jim Lindsey 1 QB 1973 Football Don Harrison 2 OT Football Greg Stirman 2 OE 1974 Football Don Harrison 2 OT Football Gregg Stirman 1 E 1975 Baseball Bill Whitaker ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ Football Don Harrison 2 T Football Greg Stirman 2 E 1976 Football Bill Curbo 1 T 1977 Football Bill Curbo 1 T 1978 Football Kelly Kent 2 RB 1982 Football Grant Feasel 2 C 1984 Football Dan Remsberg 2 T Football Paul Wells 2 DL 1985 Football Paul Wells 2 DL 1986 Women's At‐Large Camille Coates HM Track & Field Women's Basketball Claudia Schleyer 1 F 1987 Football Bill Clayton 1 DL 1988 Football Bill Clayton 1 DL 1989 Football Bill Clayton 1 DL Football Sean Grady 2 WR Women's At‐Large Grady Bruce 3 Golf Women's At‐Large Donna Sykes 3 Tennis Women's Basketball Sheryl Johnson 1 G 1990 Football Sean Grady 1 WR Men's At‐Large Wendell Edwards 2 Track & Field 1991 Men's At‐Large Larry Bryan 1 Golf Men's At‐Large Wendell Edwards 1 Track & Field Women's At‐Large Candi Evans 3 Track & Field 1992 Women's At‐Large Candi Evans 1 Track & Field Women's Volleyball Cathe Crow 2 ‐‐‐ 1993 Baseball Bryan Frazier 3 UT Men's At‐Large Brian Amos 2 Track & Field Men's At‐Large Robby Scott 2 Tennis 1994 Men's At‐Large Robby Scott 1 Tennis Women's At‐Large Kim Bartee 1 Track & Field Women's At‐Large Keri Whitehead 3 Tennis 1995 Men's At‐Large John Cole 1 Tennis Men's At‐Large Darin Newhouse 3 Golf Men's At‐Large Robby Scott #1Tennis Women's At‐Large Kim
    [Show full text]
  • HPI Forecast: Super Majority Hold Bers
    V20, N13 Thursday Oct. 30, 2014 HPI forecast: Super majority hold bers. Walorski expected to fend And the 2014 off Bock; Dems could pick up midterm? A compara- tive yawner. House seats, but not enough; Yes there is the historic all-female Senate eyes on 3 river races Republican statewide ticket, with this trio of By BRIAN A. HOWEY Connie Lawson, Kelly ENGLISH, Ind. – In the 2008 election Mitchell and Suzanne cycle, we had the epic Barack Obama/Hillary Crouch expected to Clinton presidential primary, and then Obama prevail. broke a 44-year Republican lock on Indiana’s Yes, there are Electoral College vote as the Obamas, Clintons, a cluster of Indiana McCains and Palins made more than 150 cam- House seats where paign appearances on Hoosier soil. Democrats are In the 2010 midterms, the Republicans pressing Republican stormed back, taking two Congressional seats, incumbents like Reps. Evan Bayh’s Senate seat and a 60-40 major- Ed Soliday and Hal ity in the Indiana House. In 2012, we had the Slager in The Region. $50 million U.S. Senate race that saw Rich- HPI is forecasting the historic all-female GOP ticket of There’s another set ard Mourdock depose Sen. Dick Lugar in the treasurer nominee Kelly Mitchell, Secretary of State of Indiana Senate primary, only to blunder and watch Democrat Connie Lawson, and Auditor Suzanne Crouch to prevail, seats along the Ohio Joe Donnelly capture the seat, saw Mike and House and Senate super majorities to hold River that are tos- Pence become the first governor in half a century without 50 percent of the vote, and Continued on page 3 Republicans took super majorities in both legislative cham- Indiana Democrats struggle By CHRIS SAUTTER WASHINGTON – There’s a little known fact about Democratic congressional challengers in Indiana.
    [Show full text]