1 Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services • Adam H
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Fung Yuen SSSI & Butterfly Reserve Moth Survey 2009
Fung Yuen SSSI & Butterfly Reserve Moth Survey 2009 Fauna Conservation Department Kadoorie Farm & Botanic Garden 29 June 2010 Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden Publication Series: No 6 Fung Yuen SSSI & Butterfly Reserve moth survey 2009 Fung Yuen SSSI & Butterfly Reserve Moth Survey 2009 Executive Summary The objective of this survey was to generate a moth species list for the Butterfly Reserve and Site of Special Scientific Interest [SSSI] at Fung Yuen, Tai Po, Hong Kong. The survey came about following a request from Tai Po Environmental Association. Recording, using ultraviolet light sources and live traps in four sub-sites, took place on the evenings of 24 April and 16 October 2009. In total, 825 moths representing 352 species were recorded. Of the species recorded, 3 meet IUCN Red List criteria for threatened species in one of the three main categories “Critically Endangered” (one species), “Endangered” (one species) and “Vulnerable” (one species” and a further 13 species meet “Near Threatened” criteria. Twelve of the species recorded are currently only known from Hong Kong, all are within one of the four IUCN threatened or near threatened categories listed. Seven species are recorded from Hong Kong for the first time. The moth assemblages recorded are typical of human disturbed forest, feng shui woods and orchards, with a relatively low Geometridae component, and includes a small number of species normally associated with agriculture and open habitats that were found in the SSSI site. Comparisons showed that each sub-site had a substantially different assemblage of species, thus the site as a whole should retain the mosaic of micro-habitats in order to maintain the high moth species richness observed. -
Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry
Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry A shared responsibility between government and industry Version 3.0 May 2018 Plant Health AUSTRALIA Location: Level 1 1 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 Phone: +61 2 6215 7700 Fax: +61 2 6260 4321 E-mail: [email protected] Visit our web site: www.planthealthaustralia.com.au An electronic copy of this plan is available through the email address listed above. © Plant Health Australia Limited 2018 Copyright in this publication is owned by Plant Health Australia Limited, except when content has been provided by other contributors, in which case copyright may be owned by another person. With the exception of any material protected by a trade mark, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivs 3.0 Australia licence. Any use of this publication, other than as authorised under this licence or copyright law, is prohibited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ - This details the relevant licence conditions, including the full legal code. This licence allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to Plant Health Australia (as below). In referencing this document, the preferred citation is: Plant Health Australia Ltd (2018) Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry (Version 3.0 – 2018) Plant Health Australia, Canberra, ACT. This project has been funded by Hort Innovation, using the vegetable research and development levy and contributions from the Australian Government. Hort Innovation is the grower-owned, not for profit research and development corporation for Australian horticulture Disclaimer: The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only. -
Lepidoptera of North America 5
Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains, -
Tri-Ology Vol 58, No. 1
FDACS-P-00124 April - June 2020 Volume 59, Number 2 TRI- OLOGY A PUBLICATION FROM THE DIVISION OF PLANT INDUSTRY, BUREAU OF ENTOMOLOGY, NEMATOLOGY, AND PLANT PATHOLOGY Division Director, Trevor R. Smith, Ph.D. BOTANY ENTOMOLOGY NEMATOLOGY PLANT PATHOLOGY Providing information about plants: Identifying arthropods, taxonomic Providing certification programs and Offering plant disease diagnoses native, exotic, protected and weedy research and curating collections diagnoses of plant problems and information Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services • Division of Plant Industry 1 Phaenomerus foveipennis (Morimoto), a conoderine weevil. Photo by Kyle E. Schnepp, DPI ABOUT TRI-OLOGY TABLE OF CONTENTS The Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services- Division of Plant Industry’s (FDACS-DPI) Bureau of Entomology, HIGHLIGHTS 03 Nematology, and Plant Pathology (ENPP), including the Botany Noteworthy examples from the diagnostic groups Section, produces TRI-OLOGY four times a year, covering three throughout the ENPP Bureau. months of activity in each issue. The report includes detection activities from nursery plant inspections, routine and emergency program surveys, and BOTANY 04 requests for identification of plants and pests from the public. Samples are also occasionally sent from other states or countries Quarterly activity reports from Botany and selected plant identification samples. for identification or diagnosis. HOW TO CITE TRI-OLOGY Section Editor. Year. Section Name. P.J. Anderson and G.S. Hodges ENTOMOLOGY 07 (Editors). TRI-OLOGY Volume (number): page. [Date you accessed site.] Quarterly activity reports from Entomology and samples reported as new introductions or interceptions. For example: S.E. Halbert. 2015. Entomology Section. P.J. Anderson and G.S. -
Etioline, a Steroidal Alkaloid from Solanum Diphyllum L. Magdi A
Cytotoxicity of 3-O-(β-D-Glucopyranosyl) Etioline, a Steroidal Alkaloid from Solanum diphyllum L. Magdi A. El-Sayeda,b,*, Abou El-Hamd H. Mohameda, Mohamed K. Hassana, Mohamed-Elamir F. Hegazyc, Sheikh J. Hossaind, Mohamed G. Shededa, and Shinji Ohtae a Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Yamaguchi University, Yoshida 1677-1, Yamaguchi 753-8515, Japan. E-mail: [email protected] b Aswan-Faculty of Science, South Valley University, Aswan, 81528, Egypt c Chemistry of Medicinal Plant Department, National Research Center, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt d Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna-9208, Bangladesh e Nagahama Institute of Bio-Science and Technology, Nagahama, Shiga 526-0829, Japan * Author for correspondence and reprint requests Z. Naturforsch. 64 c, 644 – 649 (2009); received May 1/June 12, 2009 In continuation of our interest in phytochemical screening of the Egyptian fl ora for poten- tial drugs, the reinvestigation of the methanolic extract of the roots of Solanum diphyllum, which grows naturally in the south of Egypt and is recorded as new to the Egyptian fl ora, af- forded an interesting, highly cytotoxic compound, named 3-O-(β-D-glucopyranosyl) etioline [(25S)-22,26-epimino-3β-(β-D-glucopyranosyloxy) cholesta-5,22(N)-dien-16α-ol]. The chemi- cal structure of this compound was determined by comprehensive NMR studies, including DEPT, COSY, HMQC, and MS. The compound exhibited high cytotoxic effects against the cervical cancer cell line, Hela cells, with an IC50 value of 150 µg/mL. Key words: Solanum diphyllum, Steroidal Alkaloid, Cytotoxicity Introduction against various cancer cell lines and antiherpes ac- tivity (Nohara et al., 2007). -
The Influence of the Type of Storage on Pest Infestation of Stored Grain in the Czech Republic
The influence of the type of storage on pest infestation of stored grain in the Czech Republic V. Stejskal1, J. Hubert1, Z. Kučerová1, Z. Munzbergová2, 3, J. Lukáš1, E. Žďárková1 1Research Institute of Crop Production, Prague-Ruzyně, Czech Republic 2Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic 3Botanical Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Průhonice, Czech Republic ABSTRACT Stored-product pests cause high economic losses by feeding on stored grain and endanger the public health by contamina- tion of food by allergens. Therefore, the aim of this work was to explore whether the risk of infestation of stored grain by pests is different in various types of storage premises. We compared the level of infestation and the pest species compo- sition in the two main types of grain stores in Central Europe that includes horizontal flat-stores (HFS) and vertical silo- stores (elevators) (VSS). A total of 147 grain stores located in Bohemia, Czech Republic was inspected. We found that both types of stores were infested with arthropods of three main taxonomic groups: mites (25 species, 120 000 individu- als), psocids (8 species, 5 600 individuals) and beetles (23 species, 4 500 individuals). We found that VSS and HFS differ in species composition of mites, psocids and beetles. However, the primary grain pests (i.e. Lepidoglyphus destructor, Acarus siro, Tyrophagus putrescentiae, Lachesilla pedicularia, Sitophilus oryzae, Rhyzopertha dominica, Oryzaephilus surinamensis and Cryptolestes ferrugineus) occurred in both types of stores. The only exception was higher frequency and abundance of two serious beetle-pests (Tribolium castaneum, Sitophilus granarius) in HFS than in VSS. -
Invasive Solanum Spp. in Florida1 W
SS AGR 312 Natural Area Weeds: Invasive Solanum spp. in Florida1 W. A. Overholt, S, F. Enloe, C. A. Minteer, L. T. Markle, and K. A. Langeland2 Introduction included information on Jamaican nightshade and another relatively common species, Solanum capsicoides All. (red The Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council’s (FLEPPC) 2017 List soda apple), both of which can easily be confused with the of Invasive Plant Species includes two Category I and two invasive Solanum species. Category II Solanum species (Solanaceae) (FLEPPC 2007). Category I Solanum species identified by the Council are S. tampicense Dunal (wetland nightshade, aquatic soda apple) Identification and Florida and S. viarum Dunal (tropical soda apple). Category II Distribution Solanum species identified by the Council are S. diphyllum The four Solanum spp. on the FLEPPC’s 2017 list and the L. (twoleaf nightshade) and S. torvum Sw. (turkeyberry). two other species mentioned above can be identified using Solanum jamaicense Mill. (Jamaican nightshade) was morphological characteristics and also by the habitat in previously included as a Category II species in the 2009 which they are found. For example, wetland nightshade FLEPPC list but was removed in 2011 because of a lack of (S. tampicense) is found in wetlands, whereas the other occurrence data in natural areas. five species are typically found in more upland and often Category I invasive exotics are defined by the FLEPPC disturbed, habitats. Tropical soda apple is found both in as those plants that alter native plant communities by open areas with full sun (often in pastures) but also in displacing native species, changing community structure wooded hammocks. -
Solanum Diphyllum (Solanaceae) – a New Record for Southern India
Rheedea Vol. 23(1) 50-51 2013 Solanum diphyllum (Solanaceae) – A new record for Southern India M. Reema Kumari Department of Botany, Maharani Lakshmi Ammanni College for Women, Bangalore – 560 012, Karnataka, India. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Solanum diphyllum L., a tropical American species, is added here to the flora of Southern India from Bangalore, Karnataka. Its occurrence in Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu is discussed. A detailed description and photograph of the species are provided for easy identification. Keywords: Solanum diphyllum, Solanaceae, New Record, Southern India Introduction Solanum L., a subcosmopolitan genus, with 1250 into petiole, entire at margins, acute or obtuse at species is distributed mostly in tropical and apex, 1–10 × 0.5–4 cm; lateral nerves 4–7 on either subtropical regions of the world, especially in side, faintly minute-hairy; petioles to 5 mm long. Americas (Mabberley, 2008). In India, the genus is Inflorescence a racemose fascicle, c. 10-flowered; represented by 48 species (Reema Kumari, 2004). peduncles to 7 mm long. Calyx cupular, 1.5–2 Earlier, while revising the Indian Solanaceae, × 2–2.5 mm, minutely pubescent, 5-lobed; lobes specimens of a Solanum sp. were collected from broadly triangular, acute, c. 0.5 × 0.8 mm, hirsute; two different localities in Pune, Maharashtra and pedicels to 1 cm long. Corolla stellate, 5–8 mm determined as S. diphyllum L. after seeing the type across, creamy white, 5-lobed; lobes equal, elliptic and comparing with authentic specimens (Reema or linear-ovate, acute, 4–5 × 2.5–3 mm, incurved, Kumari, 2004). More recently, specimens were also hyaline; tube 1–2 mm long. -
2015 Al Khatib BMC Evolutionar
Multilocus phylogeny and ecological differentiation of the ”Eupelmus urozonus species group” (Hymenoptera, Eupelmidae) in the West-Palaearctic Fadel Al Khatib, Astrid Cruaud, L. Fusu, Guénaëlle Genson, Jean Yves Rasplus, Nicolas Ris, Gérard Delvare To cite this version: Fadel Al Khatib, Astrid Cruaud, L. Fusu, Guénaëlle Genson, Jean Yves Rasplus, et al.. Mul- tilocus phylogeny and ecological differentiation of the ”Eupelmus urozonus species group” (Hy- menoptera, Eupelmidae) in the West-Palaearctic. BMC Evolutionary Biology, BioMed Central, 2016, 16, 10.1186/s12862-015-0571-2. hal-02635651 HAL Id: hal-02635651 https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02635651 Submitted on 27 May 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Al khatib et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology (2016) 16:13 DOI 10.1186/s12862-015-0571-2 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Multilocus phylogeny and ecological differentiation of the “Eupelmus urozonus species group” (Hymenoptera, Eupelmidae) in the West-Palaearctic F. Al khatib1,3*, A. Cruaud2, L. Fusu4, G. Genson2, J.-Y. Rasplus2, N. Ris1 and G. Delvare3 Abstract Background: The ecological differentiation of insects with parasitic life-style is a complex process that may involve phylogenetic constraints as well as morphological and/or behavioural adaptations. -
Mitochondrial Genomes of Lepidopteran Insects Consideredmitochondrial Crop Genomes Pests of Lepidopteran Insects Considered Crop Pests
DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.71158 Provisional chapter Chapter 6 Mitochondrial Genomes of Lepidopteran Insects MitochondrialConsidered Crop Genomes Pests of Lepidopteran Insects Considered Crop Pests Viviana Ramírez-Ríos, Javier Correa Alvarez Vivianaand Diego Ramírez-Ríos, Villanueva-Mejia Javier Correa Alvarez and Diego Villanueva-Mejia Additional information is available at the end of the chapter Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.71158 Abstract In this chapter, the complete mitochondrial genome of Guatemalan potato moth, Tecia solanivora (Povolny, 1973) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) is presented as a model to under- stand how to characterize and study a mitogenome in insects. It was sequenced, analyzed, and compared with other lepidopteran insects. T. solanivora mitogenome is a circular double-stranded molecule, typically found in insects and containing 37 genes, all them well described over the other lepidopteran mitogenomes sequenced. Interestingly, in this mitogenome was found a gene arrangement in the tRNA-Met gene different from the ancestral arrangement, but commonly present in insect mitogenomes. Other important characteristics are the high A + T-biased and negative AT- and GC-skews contents, but also unusual canonical start codons in 12 protein-coding genes and an incomplete stop codon in the cytochrome oxidase subunit II gene consisting of just a Thymine. Another common feature shared with lepidopteran mitogenomes is the A + T-rich region. It is char- acterized by having 325 bb, the ‘ATAGA’ motif, a 17 bp poly (T) stretch and a (AT)8 ele- ment preceded by the ‘ATTTA’ motif. Likewise, this mitogenome has 21 intergenic spacer regions. -
Frontenac Provincial Park
FRONTENAC PROVINCIAL PARK One Malaise trap was deployed at Frontenac Provincial Park in 2014 (44.51783, -76.53944, 176m ASL; Figure 1). This trap collected arthropods for twenty weeks from May 9 – September 25, 2014. All 10 Malaise trap samples were processed; every other sample was analyzed using the individual specimen protocol while the second half was analyzed via bulk analysis. A total of 3372 BINs were obtained. Half of the BINs captured were flies (Diptera), followed by bees, ants and wasps (Hymenoptera), moths and butterflies (Lepidoptera), and true bugs (Hemiptera; Figure 2). In total, 750 arthropod species were named, representing 24.6% of the BINs from the site (Appendix 1). All but 1 of the BINs were assigned Figure 1. Malaise trap deployed at Frontenac at least to family, and 58.2% were assigned to a genus Provincial Park in 2014. (Appendix 2). Specimens collected from Frontenac represent 232 different families and 838 genera. Diptera Hymenoptera Lepidoptera Hemiptera Coleoptera Trombidiformes Psocodea Trichoptera Araneae Mesostigmata Entomobryomorpha Thysanoptera Neuroptera Orthoptera Sarcoptiformes Blattodea Mecoptera Odonata Symphypleona Ephemeroptera Julida Opiliones Figure 2. Taxonomy breakdown of BINs captured in the Malaise trap at Frontenac. APPENDIX 1. TAXONOMY REPORT Class Order Family Genus Species Arachnida Araneae Clubionidae Clubiona Clubiona obesa Dictynidae Emblyna Emblyna annulipes Emblyna sublata Gnaphosidae Cesonia Cesonia bilineata Linyphiidae Ceraticelus Ceraticelus fissiceps Pityohyphantes Pityohyphantes -
Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, Version 2018-07-24
Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, version 2018-07-24 Kenai National Wildlife Refuge biology staff July 24, 2018 2 Cover image: map of 16,213 georeferenced occurrence records included in the checklist. Contents Contents 3 Introduction 5 Purpose............................................................ 5 About the list......................................................... 5 Acknowledgments....................................................... 5 Native species 7 Vertebrates .......................................................... 7 Invertebrates ......................................................... 55 Vascular Plants........................................................ 91 Bryophytes ..........................................................164 Other Plants .........................................................171 Chromista...........................................................171 Fungi .............................................................173 Protozoans ..........................................................186 Non-native species 187 Vertebrates ..........................................................187 Invertebrates .........................................................187 Vascular Plants........................................................190 Extirpated species 207 Vertebrates ..........................................................207 Vascular Plants........................................................207 Change log 211 References 213 Index 215 3 Introduction Purpose to avoid implying