DOCSLIB.ORG

Determination of Polymer Blend Composition, TS-22

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Determination of Polymer Blend Composition, TS-22 Thermal Analysis & Rheology THERMAL SOLUTIONS DETERMINATION OF POLYMER BLEND COMPOSITION PROBLEM SOLUTION The blending of two or more polymers is becoming a Conventional DSC is a technique which measures the total common method for developing new materials for demand- heat flow into and out of a material as a function of ing applications such as impact-resistant parts and temperature and/or time. Hence, conventional DSC packaging films. Since the ultimate properties of blends can measures the sum of all thermal events occurring in the TM be significantly affected by what polymers are present, as material. Modulated DSC , on the other hand, is a new well as by small changes in the blend composition, technique which subjects a material to a linear heating suppliers of these materials are interested in rapid tests method which has a superimposed sinusoidal temperature which provide verification that the correct polymers and oscillation (modulation) resulting in a cyclic heating profile. amount of each polymer are present in the blend. Differen- tial scanning calorimetry (DSC) has proven to be an Deconvolution of the resultant heat flow profile during this effective technique for characterizing blends such as cyclic heating provides not only the "total" heat flow polyethylene/polypropylene where the crystalline melting obtained from conventional DSC, but also separates that endotherms or other transitions (e.g., glass transition) "total" heat flow into its heat capacity-related (reversing) associated with the polymer components are sufficiently and kinetic (nonreversing) components. It is this separa- TM separated to allow identification and/or quantitation. tion aspect which allows MDSC to more completely However, many blends do not exhibit this convenient evaluate polymer blend compositions. separation and thus are difficult to accurately evaluate by Figure 1, for example, shows the conventional DSC (total conventional DSC. Figure 1. PET/ABS BLEND (AS RECEIVED) CONVENTIONAL DSC -0.2 120.92°C 67.38°C -0.4 + 70.26°C (H) 235.36°C 22.63 J/g 111.82°C 9.016 J/g Heat(W/g) Flow -0.6 249.76°C -0.8 50 100 150 200 250 Temperature (o C) TS-22 heat flow) result for an as received polymer blend reversing under MDSC, while cold crystallization is containing polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and acryloni- nonreversing. Hence, separation of the total heat flow into trile-butadiene-styrene (ABS). Three transitions indicative its reversing and nonreversing components separates of the glass transition, cold crystallization, and crystalline overlapping thermal events with different behavior. The melting of the PET are seen at 67oC, 112oC, and 235oC nonreversing curve in this case shows only the exotherm respectively. However, no apparent ABS transitions are associated with the PET cold crystallization . The reversing observed. Upon reheating, after cooling at a controlled rate curve shows three transitions - the glass transition (69oC) (10oC/minute), the conventional DSC result changes and crystalline melting associated with PET [this melting is (Figure 2). Now only two transitions are observed - a glass not shown in Figure 3 since it's outside the temperature transition at 106oC and a crystalline melt at 238oC. Explana- range chosen], as well as a second glass transition (at tion of these changes on reheating, particularly the 105oC) associated with the ABS. In conventional DSC, this apparent shift in the glass transition temperature, isdifficult latter glass transition is hidden under the PET cold based on only these results. crystallization peak and only becomes visible on reheating after a less amorphous PET phase is produced. The MDSCTM results for the "as received" material shown Figures 4 and 5 show another example of the improved in Figure 3 resolve these interpretation issues. Phenomena interpretation provided by MDSCTM. The total heat flow such as glass transitions and melting are predominately (Figure 4) is the conventional DSC result for a blend believed to contain PET, polycarbonate (PC) and polyeth- Figure 2. PET/ABS BLEND (REHEAT) CONVENTIONAL DSC -0.2 106.31°C -0.4 108.95°C (H) + 237.84°C 20.64 J/g Heat Flow (W/g) Flow Heat -0.6 249.95°C -0.8 50 100 150 200 250 Temperature (o C) ylene (PE). Obviously, interpretation of this curve is not CURVE TRANSITION ASSIGNMENT straightforward. The MDSC results (reversing and Reversing Glass Transition (73oC) PET nonreversing heat flow in Figures 4 & 5), on the other Melt (116oC) PE hand, again facilitate interpretation. The total heat flow Glass Transition (140oC) PC curve shows a glass transition, an overlapping group of Melt (224oC) PET o transitions at 110 - 140oC, and a crystalline melt. Separa- Nonreversing Relaxation (75 C) PET Cold Crystallization (120oC) PET tion of the total heat flow into its reversing and nonreversing components allows the following transitions to be resolved and assigned. Figure 3. PET/ABS BLEND (AS RECEIVED) MODULATED DSCTM -0.10 -0.02 -0.04 Nonreversing -0.11 -0.03 -0.05 -0.12 -0.04 -0.06 Total Reversing 69.00°C 72.69°C (H) -0.13 PET Tg -0.05 -0.07 Heat (W/g) Flow 104.48°C 107.25°C (H) -0.14 ABS Tg -0.06 -0.08 [ ] Rev Heat Flow (W/g) [ - - - - - - -] Nonrev Heat Flow (W/g) Flow Heat Nonrev - -] - - [ - -0.15 -0.09 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Temperature ( o C) Figure 4. PE/PC/PET BLEND) MODULATED DSCTM -0.70 0.00 -0.80 -0.03 NONREVERSING -0.90 -0.20 -1.00 TOTAL -0.05 -1.10 -0.40 Heat Flow (mW) Heat Flow REVERSING Nonrev Heat Flow (mW) Flow Heat Nonrev -1.20 (mW) Flow Heat Rev -0.07 -1.30 -0.60 -1.40 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Temperature ( o C) Figure 5. PE/PC/PET BLEND) MDSC TM REVERSING HEAT FLOW -0.3 PET Tg -0.4 72.59°C POLYCARBONATE Tg 75.28°C (H) 139.90°C 115.90°C 143.55°C (H)72.59°C -0.5 6.358 Jg 223.61°C Heat Flow (mW) Flow Heat 21.55 Jg -0.6 123.29°C HDPE MELTING 249.08°C -0.7 PET MELTING 50 100 150 200 250 Temperature (°C) Modulated DSC and MDSC are TA Instruments trademarks used to describe technology invented by Dr. Mike Reading of ICI (Slough, UK) and patented by TA Instmments (US Patent No. B1 5,224,775; 5,248,199; 5,335,993; 5,346,306). For more information or to place an order, contact: TA Instruments, Inc., 109 Lukens Drive, New Castle, DE 19720, Telephone: (302) 427-4000, Fax: (302) 427-4001 TA Instruments S.A.R.L., Paris, France, Telephone: 33-01-30489460, Fax: 33-01-30489451 TA Instruments N.V./S.A., Gent, Belgium, Telephone: 32-9-220-79-89, Fax: 32-9-220-83-21 TA Instruments GmbH, Alzenau, Germany, Telephone: 49-6023-30044, Fax: 49-6023-30823 TA Instruments, Ltd., Leatherhead, England, Telephone: 44-1-372-360363, Fax: 44-1-372-360135 TA Instruments Japan K.K., Tokyo, Japan, Telephone: 813-5434-2771, Fax: 813-5434-2770 Internet: http://www.tainst.com TS-22A Thermal Analysis & Rheology A SUBSIDIARY OF WATERS CORPORATION.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Modified PPE-PS Americas
    Noryl* resin Modifi ed PPE-PS Americas 2 SABIC Innovative Plastics 1. Introduction Noryl* resin is based on a modified PPO technology developed by SABIC Innovative Plastics. Noryl resin is an extremely versatile material - a miscible blend of PPO resin and polystyrene - and the basic properties may be modified to achieve a variety of characteristics. Contents 1. Introduction 4 2. Applications 6 3. Properties and design 10 3.1 General properties 10 3.2 Mechanical properties 10 3.3 Electrical properties 13 3.4 Flammability 13 3.5 Environmental resistance 14 3.6 Processability 14 3.7 Mold shrinkage 15 4. Processing 16 4.1 Pre-drying 16 4.2 Equipment 16 4.3 Processing conditions 17 4.4 Purging of the barrel 17 4.5 Recycling 17 5. Secondary operations 18 5.1 Welding 18 5.2 Adhesives 19 5.3 Mechanical assembly 20 5.4 Painting 20 5.5 Metalization 21 5.6 Laser marking 22 5.7 Foaming 22 SABIC Innovative Plastics 3 1. Introduction Noryl* modifi ed PPO resin PPE-PS Characteristics Typical characteristics include excellent dimensional stability, low mold shrinkage, low water absorption and very low creep behavior at elevated temperatures. These properties combined with an outstanding hydrolytic stability in hot and cold water, make Noryl resin an excellent potential candidate for fluid engineering, environmental and potable water applications. An outstanding feature of Noryl resin is its retention of tensile and flexural strength, even at elevated temperatures. The gradual reduction in modulus as temperature is increased, is a key advantage of this material. As a result, parts made or molded from Noryl resin may be used with predictable performance over a wide temperature range.
    [Show full text]
  • Poly(Phenylene Ether) Based Amphiphilic Block Copolymers
    polymers Review ReviewPoly(phenylene ether) Based Amphiphilic Poly(phenyleneBlock Copolymers ether) Based Amphiphilic Block Copolymers Edward N. Peters EdwardSABIC, Selkirk, N. Peters NY 12158, USA; [email protected]; Tel.: +1-518-475-5458 SABIC, Selkirk, NY 12158, USA; [email protected]; Tel.: +1-518-475-5458 Received: 14 August 2017; Accepted: 5 September 2017; Published: 8 September 2017 Received: 14 August 2017; Accepted: 5 September 2017; Published: 8 September 2017 Abstract: Polyphenylene ether (PPE) telechelic macromonomers are unique hydrophobic polyols Abstract: Polyphenylene ether (PPE) telechelic macromonomers are unique hydrophobic polyols which have been used to prepare amphiphilic block copolymers. Various polymer compositions which have been used to prepare amphiphilic block copolymers. Various polymer compositions have have been synthesized with hydrophilic blocks. Their macromolecular nature affords a range of been synthesized with hydrophilic blocks. Their macromolecular nature affords a range of structures structures including random, alternating, and di- and triblock copolymers. New macromolecular including random, alternating, and di- and triblock copolymers. New macromolecular architectures architectures can offer tailored property profiles for optimum performance. Besides reducing can offer tailored property profiles for optimum performance. Besides reducing moisture uptake and moisture uptake and making the polymer surface more hydrophobic, the PPE hydrophobic segment making the polymer surface more hydrophobic, the PPE hydrophobic segment has good compatibility has good compatibility with polystyrene (polystyrene-philic). In general, the PPE contributes to the with polystyrene (polystyrene-philic). In general, the PPE contributes to the toughness, strength, toughness, strength, and thermal performance. Hydrophilic segments go beyond their affinity for and thermal performance. Hydrophilic segments go beyond their affinity for water.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 16-2
    CHAPTER 16-2 ● Polymer Blends (reference) 1. Polymer-polymer Miscibility By Olabisi, Robeson, and Shaw Academic Press(1979) 2. Poplymer Blends, by D.R Paul, Ed, Academic Press (1978). 3. specific Interactions and the Miscibility of Polymer Blends, by Coleman, Graf, and Painter(1990) 4. Polymer Alloys and Blends, Thermodynamics and Rheology, by L.A. Utracki,(1990). ● Blend Preparation 방법: (a) Melt blending- screw extruder를 사용하여 blend하고자 하는 고분자를 용융점 이상에서 extrusion하여 mixing함. (b) Solution blending- mixing하고자 하는 고분자의 cosolvent를 사용하여 solution으로 만든 다음 cast하여 필름(film) 상태 로 blend를 제조함. (ex) polymer membrane(분리막)제조시. 그러나, amorphous polymer와 crystalline polymer를 blend했을때 는 film의 투명성으로부터 사용성을 판별하기는 어렵다. (2)DSC(differential scanning calorimetry): 시차 주사 열분석기를 이용하여 블렌드의 Tg(유리전이 온도)를 측 정함으로서 상용성을 관찰함-가장 많이 쓰이는 방법중 하나임. 즉 (i) a single phase exhibits one Tg. (ex) A polymer : Polycarbonate, Tg=150°C (423 K) B polymer : Polycaprolactane, Tg=-52°C (221 K) Blend (A+B)/50:50인 경우 w w 1 = A + B Tg Blend Tg A Tg B 1 = 0.5 + 0.5 (TgBlend=17.3°C (290.3 K) Tg Blend 423 221 (2) microscopy method (Scanning Electron microscopy). (3) FT-IR (Fourier Transform IR) (4) Ternary solution method (polymer 1- polymer 2 - solvent) - Compatible components from a single, transparent phase in mutual solution, while incompatible polymers exhibit phase seperation if the solution is not extremely dilute. - Equilibrium is relatively easily achived in dilutions and - Blends of immiscible (or partially miscible) materials can be useful so long as no significant desegration occurs while the mixture is being mixed.
    [Show full text]
  • Spherical Polybutylene Terephthalate (PBT)—Polycarbonate (PC) Blend Particles by Mechanical Alloying and Thermal Rounding
    polymers Article Spherical Polybutylene Terephthalate (PBT)—Polycarbonate (PC) Blend Particles by Mechanical Alloying and Thermal Rounding Maximilian A. Dechet 1,2,3,†, Juan S. Gómez Bonilla 1,2,3,†, Lydia Lanzl 3,4, Dietmar Drummer 3,4, Andreas Bück 1,2,3, Jochen Schmidt 1,2,3 and Wolfgang Peukert 1,2,3,* 1 Institute of Particle Technology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Cauerstraße 4, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany; [email protected] (M.A.D.); [email protected] (J.S.G.B.); [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (J.S.) 2 Interdisciplinary Center for Functional Particle Systems, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Haberstraße 9a, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany 3 Collaborative Research Center 814—Additive Manufacturing, Am Weichselgarten 9, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany; [email protected] (L.L.); [email protected] (D.D.) 4 Institute of Polymer Technology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Am Weichselgarten 9, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-9131-85-29400 † The authors contributed equally. Received: 22 November 2018; Accepted: 7 December 2018; Published: 11 December 2018 Abstract: In this study, the feasibility of co-grinding and the subsequent thermal rounding to produce spherical polymer blend particles for selective laser sintering (SLS) is demonstrated for polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) and polycarbonate (PC). The polymers are jointly comminuted in a planetary ball mill, and the obtained product particles are rounded in a heated downer reactor. The size distribution of PBT–PC composite particles is characterized with laser diffraction particle sizing, while the shape and morphology are investigated via scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
    [Show full text]
  • Designing Polymer Blends Using Neural Networks, Genetic
    Designing Polymer Blends Using Neural Networks, Genetic Algorithms, and Markov Chains N. K. Roy1,2, W. D. Potter1, D. P. Landau2 1Department of Computer Science University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 2Center for Simulational Physics University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 ABSTRACT In this paper we present a new technique to simulate polymer blends that overcomes the shortcomings in polymer system modeling. This method has an inherent advantage in that the vast existing information on polymer systems forms a critical part in the design process. The stages in the design begin with selecting potential candidates for blending using Neural Networks. Generally the parent polymers of the blend need to have certain properties and if the blend is miscible then it will reflect the properties of the parents. Once this step is finished the entire problem is encoded into a genetic algorithm using various models as fitness functions. We select the lattice fluid model of Sanchez and Lacombe1, which allows for a compressible lattice. After reaching a steady-state with the genetic algorithm we transform the now stochastic problem that satisfies detailed balance and the condition of ergodicity to a Markov Chain of states. This is done by first creating a transition matrix, and then using it on the incidence vector obtained from the final populations of the genetic algorithm. The resulting vector is converted back into a 1 population of individuals that can be searched to find the individuals with the best fitness values. A high degree of convergence not seen using the genetic algorithm alone is obtained. We check this method with known systems that are miscible and then use it to predict miscibility on several unknown systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase Behavior of Polymer Solutions and Blends Piotr Knychała,† Ksenia Timachova,‡ Michał Banaszak,*,∥,⊥ and Nitash P
    Perspective pubs.acs.org/Macromolecules 50th Anniversary Perspective: Phase Behavior of Polymer Solutions and Blends Piotr Knychała,† Ksenia Timachova,‡ Michał Banaszak,*,∥,⊥ and Nitash P. Balsara*,‡,# † Faculty of Polytechnic, The President Stanislaw Wojciechowski State University of Applied Sciences, Kalisz, Poland ‡ Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States ∥ ⊥ Faculty of Physics and NanoBioMedical Centre, Adam Mickiewicz University, ul. Umultowska 85, 61-614 Poznan, Poland # Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, United States *S Supporting Information ABSTRACT: We summarize our knowledge of the phase behavior of polymer solutions and blends using a unified approach. We begin with a derivation of the Flory−Huggins expression for the Gibbs free energy of mixing two chemically dissimilar polymers. The Gibbs free energy of mixing of polymer solutions is obtained as a special case. These expressions are used to interpret observed phase behavior of polymer solutions and blends. Temperature- and pressure-dependent phase diagrams are used to determine the Flory−Huggins interaction parameter, χ. We also discuss an alternative approach for measuring χ due to de Gennes, who showed that neutron scattering from concentration fluctuations in one-phase systems was a sensitive function of χ. In most cases, the agreement between experimental data and the standard Flory−Huggins−de Gennes approach is qualitative. We conclude by summarizing advanced theories that have been proposed to address the limitations of the standard approach. In spite of considerable effort, there is no consensus on the reasons for departure between the standard theories and experiments. ■ INTRODUCTION mean-field theory of de Gennes and their effect on phase 4,5 Our understanding of the thermodynamic underpinnings of the behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Polystyrene-Modified
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repository@USM EFFECTS OF POLYSTYRENE-MODIFIED NATURAL RUBBER ON THE PROPERTIES OF POLYPROPYLENE/POLYSTYRENE BLENDS by SIA CHOON SIONG Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science DECEMBER 2008 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to extend my sincerest gratitude to my parents and siblings for their love, unconditional support and plenty of encouragement to me although we are financially-challenged during the first stages of my journey. It’s so happen that I was very persistent in pursuing my dream that I had burdened all of you both mentally and financially. Subsequently, this has have become OUR dream and without you, it will be mission impossible for me to achieve current success. My deepest love and appreciation for all of you that stood by me through all these challenging times. I am totally indebted to my direct supervisor Prof. Azanam Shah Hashim for his constant dedication, assistance, advice and guidance that propelled me to a more endowed researcher armed with a balanced skill to carry out my research with great perseverance and dedication. It’s your “First Time Right” mentally that has been our motto to ensure this research a smooth sailing journey. We enjoyed each others’ company during the times of research and not forgetting the lunches that we occasionally have during break time. Truly a memorable time that I will always cherish in my heart. Special acknowledgement is accorded to my fellow ‘brothers’ Yap Gay Suu and Chin Kian Meng for their support and inputs that made this research a joyful and pleasant journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Rheology of Miscible Polymer Blends
    RHEOLOGY OF MISCIBLE POLYMER BLENDS WITH HYDROGEN BONDING A Dissertation Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Zhiyi Yang August, 2007 i RHEOLOGY OF MISCIBLE POLYMER BLENDS WITH HYDROGEN BONDING Zhiyi Yang Dissertation Approved: Accepted: Advisor Department Chair Dr. Chang Dae Han Dr. Sadhan C. Jana Committee Member Dean of the College Dr. Thein Kyu Dr. George R. Newkome Committee Member Dean of the Graduate School Dr. Sadhan C. Jana Dr. George R. Newkome Committee Member Date Dr. Ali Dhinojwala Committee Member Dr. George G. Chase ii ABSTRACT Poly(4-vinylphenol) (PVPh) was blended with four different polymers: poly(vinyl methyl ether) (PVME), poly(vinyl acetate) (PVAc), poly(2-vinylpyridine) (P2VP), and poly(4-vinylpyridine) (P4VP) by solvent casting. The miscibility of these four PVPh- based blend systems was investigated using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and the composition-dependent glass transition temperature (Tg) was predicted by a thermodynamic theory. The hydrogen bonds between phenolic group in PVPh and ether group, carbonyl group or pyridine group was confirmed by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The fraction of hydrogen bonds was calculated by the Coleman- Graf-Painter association model. Linear dynamic viscoelasticity of four PVPh-based miscible polymer blends with hydrogen bonding was investigated. Emphasis was placed on investigating how the linear dynamic viscoelasticity of miscible polymer blends with specific interaction might be different from that of miscible polymer blends without specific interaction. We have found that an application of time-temperature superposition (TTS) to the PVPh-based miscible blends with intermolecular hydrogen bonding is warranted even when the difference in the component glass transition temperatures is as large as about 200 °C, while TTS fails for miscible polymer blends without specific interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Polymer Blends
    CHAPTER 15 COMMERCIAL POLYMER BLENDS M. K. AKKAPEDDI Honeywell Inc., EAS R & T, Morristown, USA 15.1 Abstract In this chapter, an overview of the commercially important blends is presented with a particular emphasis on the rationale for their commercial development, the compatibilization principles, their key mechanical properties and their current applica- tions and markets. To facilitate the discussion, the commercial polymer blends have been classifi ed into twelve major groups depending on the type of the resin family they are based on, viz. (i) polyolefi n, (ii) styrenic, (iii) vinyl, (iv) acrylic, (v) elastomeric, (vi) polyamide, (vii) polycarbonate, (viii) poly(oxymethylene), (ix) polyphenyleneether, (x) thermoplastic polyester, (xi) specialty polymers, and (xii) thermoset blends. Within each major category, the individual polymer blends of industrial signifi cance have been described with relevant data. Since the discussion is limited only to those blends that are actually produced and used on a commercial scale, the relevant cost and performance factors that contribute to the commercial viability and success of various types of blends have been outlined. In comparing the different blends, the specifi c advantages of each type, as well as any potential overlap in performance with other type of blends have also been discussed. The fundamental advantage of polymer blends viz. their ability to combine cost-effectively the unique features of individual resins, is particularly illustrated in the discussion of crystalline/amorphous polymer blends, such as the polyamide and the polyester blends. Key to the success of many commercial blends, however, is in the selection of intrinsically complementing systems or in the development of effective compatibilization method.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Perspective of Advances in the Science and Technology of Polymer Blends
    Polymers 2014, 6, 1251-1265; doi:10.3390/polym6051251 OPEN ACCESS polymers ISSN 2073-4360 www.mdpi.com/journal/polymers Review Historical Perspective of Advances in the Science and Technology of Polymer Blends Lloyd Robeson Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-610-481-0117 Received: 21 March 2014; in revised form: 14 April 2014 / Accepted: 25 April 2014 / Published: 30 April 2014 Abstract: This paper will review the important developments in the field of polymer blends. The subject of polymer blends has been one of the most prolific areas in polymer science and technology in the past five decades judging from publications and patents on the subject. Although a continuing important subject, the peak intensity occurred in the 1970s and 1980s. The author has been active in this area for five decades and this paper is a recollection of some of the important milestones/breakthroughs in the field. The discussion will cover the development of the theory relevant to polymer blends, experimental methods, approaches to achieve compatibility in immiscible/incompatible blends, the nature of phase separation and commercial activity. Keywords: polymer blends; polymer miscibility; polymer blend compatibilization; historical review of polymer blends 1. Introduction The area of polymer blends has been a major topic of polymer research and development for almost five decades. Although noted to be of interest much earlier, the academic and industrial effort in polymer blends exponentially increased starting in the late 1960s. Although various reasons were responsible for this increased interest, one significant factor was the emergence of a major engineering polymer blend based on polystyrene (specifically impact polystyrene) and poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (PPO).
    [Show full text]
  • Interpenetrating Polymer Network in Drug Delivery Formulations: Revisited
    Online - 2455-3891 Vol 12, Issue 6, 2019 Print - 0974-2441 Review Article INTERPENETRATING POLYMER NETWORK IN DRUG DELIVERY FORMULATIONS: REVISITED SUBHASISH PRAMANIK*, PRITHVIRAJ CHAKRABORTY Department of Pharmaceutics, Himalayan Pharmacy Institute, Majhitar, Sikkim, India. Email: [email protected] Received: 18 March 2019, Revised and Accepted: 22 April 2019 ABSTRACT Interpenetrating polymer network has gained a lot of interest in drug delivery system due to its ease of modification during its synthesis and development state, which evolved novel physicochemical and mechanical properties within the formulation. In this work, a detailed revision was done which includes its methods of preparations, factors that influence their properties, basic characterization parameters, and use in drug delivery systems along with patented formulations. Keywords: Interpenetrating polymer network, Characterization, Semi-interpenetrating polymer network. © 2019 The Authors. Published by Innovare Academic Sciences Pvt Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4. 0/) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2019.v12i6.33117 INTRODUCTION agent, the IPN properties can be enhanced which precisely include porosity, elasticity, and degree of swelling and responsive behavior [10]. In the modern science of drug discovery, the polymer is widely used and valuable excipients in the different pharmaceutical formulation. KINDS OF IPN It also has a high performance in the parenteral area, controlled drug release, and drug targeting to specific organs. Now in recent years, IPN can be ordered in many different ways (Fig. 2). polymer mixture or blending is used to improve the polymer properties to subside the poor biological properties or progress in mechanical Based on chemical bonding strength of the polymer [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Polymer Blend and Composite
    Polymer blend and Composite (Lecture 3 ) Dr.Vandana K. Nair Polymer Blends • Combination of two or more polymers or copolymers. • 3 types: • Immiscible (heterogeneous) polymer blends: • example: high-impact polystyrene 2. Compatible polymer blends • Blends that miscible in a certain useful range of composition and temperature, but immiscible in others. • Example: PC/ABS blends (Poly carbonate-Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene) • 3. Miscible polymer blends ( homogeneous) : Single phase structure. • Example: PET-PBT ( Poly ethylene terephthalate- Polybutylene terephthalate Properties • Appear as separate phases, when viewed under a microscope. • Between different polymer chains, only vander waals forces or hydrogen bonding exists. • The properties are closely related to the properties of the individual components. • Sensitive component of a blend may be protected from degradation by blending. • Eg. PMMA is degraded by gamma-radiation. But its blend with styrene-acrylonitrile copolymer reduces the rate of degradation. • Blending increases the properties like flame retardence, abrasive resistance etc. Application • Polycarbonate – Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (PC- ABS) blend is used for making machine parts. • Nylon 6-PC blend is used for making sport equipments and transport containers. • Polydimethylphenylene –polystyrene ( PDP-PS) blend possesses low water absorption, resistance to hydrolysis. Its used in electrical industries, radio and TV parts and automobile parts. • ABS plastics( Acrylonitrile styrene with Butadiene styrene rubber). Posses high impact strength and high mouldability. ABS products are used in automobile industry for making panels, door bands, door covers etc. COMPOSITES • Material made from two or more constituent materials with significantly different physical or chemical properties that, when combined, produce a material with characteristics different from the individual components.
    [Show full text]