NAGOYA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL of LAW Doctoral
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
NAGOYA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF LAW Doctoral Dissertation ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITY FOR WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION IN LAOS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM JAPAN A Dissertation Submitted in Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Laws Course: LL.D. (Comparative Law) Program in Law and Political Science 2016-2019 Name of the Student: DONKEODAVONG Latdavanh Student ID Number: 431604065 Main Academic Supervisor: Professor INABA Kazumasa Sub-Academic Supervisor: Professor ICHIHASHI Katsuya Sub-Academic Supervisor: Professor FUKASAWA Ryuichiro Date of Submission: July 26, 2019 Abstract This research project investigates the administrative responsibility for water pollution prevention in Laos by referring to Japan. The main aim of this study is to answer three main research questions. First, how does the legal system in Laos fail to prevent water pollution? Second, what are aspects of other countries’ legal systems worthy of reference for Laos? Lastly, how is administrative responsibility in Japan worthy of reference in order to find legal issues for Laos? In order to answer these research questions, this paper consists of four chapters, an introduction, and conclusion. Chapter I attempts the reason for paying attention to the concept of responsibility, which is a “leading thread” of this study. This chapter compares the general differences between the Japanese and Laotian legal systems. Chapter II describes the history and characteristics of the water pollution prevention law in Laos. Chapter III analyzes the development of the water pollution prevention law in Japan in order to discover the problems of the Laotian legal system, as described in Chapter II. Based on this analysis, Chapter IV presents the problems of the water pollution prevention law in Laos. The outline of this study describes the main points as follows. As far as the research’s findings in this paper, in Laos, when a private company broke environmental law, instead of a civil law dispute resolution by the people’s court, some administrative organs such as the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment have sanctioned the violator. However, it can find a tendency not to exercise the expected regulatory powers in timely because the provisions of the law are not fully explicitly codified. The result in the kind of opportunistic action or inaction of regulatory powers against the violators and therefore, in only some cases of low-impact of pollution conflict occurs, an organ at the village level may mediate the conflicting parties instead of exercising regulatory powers delegated by the laws to the responsibility of organs. Due to the difficulty of dispute resolution in civil law and proper administrative sanctions in any conflicts, the phenomenon of arbitration at the village level has arisen only in the same cases. i In this sense, it can find the specific characteristic of violators responsible for the state in Laos. Nonetheless, the common and serious harms to the residents’ lives and health problem arisen in Japan that administrative agencies’ inaction to exercise their regulatory powers for prevention of water pollution. In fact, one of the main reasons for an increase in water pollution crisis in Laos is related to attempt by the government to engage in rapid economic developments. Some state-owned and joint investment venture companies with the government have impacted the lives and health of residents as result of water pollution. Similar problems have been arisen and the administrative interventions have been expanded in Japan. In order to try the current analysis in a more objective way, a research approach is to analyze Laos from the “outside.” The “outside” in this paper refers to the Japanese legal system. Because of the legal phenomenon that the victims pursue not only the violators, but also administrative responsibility is found in Japan. It is the concept of administrative responsibility in Japan defines state redress of inaction and administrative case litigation of mandamus action as the concept of legal responsibility of administration. This concept determines to protect the residents’ rights of lives and health caused by the inaction of legal regulatory powers by the administrative agencies such as the prefectural governors. Besides, even in the case where there is no legal power, there are cases where municipalities have tried to protect the lives and health of residents in order to supplement the prefectures in the case of inaction. Of course, the legal systems of the two countries are entirely different. However, as mentioned above, the simultaneous experiences of economic developments and water pollution have raised the legal phenomenon of the pursuit of administrative responsibility. This legal structure can also be the hint for Laos. Because disputes of private persons are not resolved by the people’s courts in civil law as in the West, but the victims require the administrative organs to exercise those regulatory powers in Laos. The conclusions obtained as the result of this legal study are as follows. First, when serious water pollution results from rapid economic developments, the limits of the village level arbitration as in the past become clear. This study shows the “logic” that some structural transformation will be ii born to the legal system in the future. Second, in order to demonstrate the logic, this study focuses on “responsibility” as the “leading thread.” By this, it can find an essential issue of the conceptual turn from violator responsibility (the regulated entity) to administrative responsibility (regulatory entity). It is the central theme of this study. As one of the essential conditions, the need for the substantive environmental law reform that clearly defines the missions of organs and requirements for administrative actions is obvious. As long as the substantive responsibility is vague, even if the legal system of litigation develops, this will not be enough. However, third, concerning the reality that the village level arbitration conducts in Laos, the actual situation in Japan where municipalities even in the case without legal power have been tried to prevent water pollution also be helpful. In the long-term, it is logical that the structural transformation as described in the second point will occur but in the short-term, strengthening the responsibility for village level arbitration be the issue of this country. The efforts of municipalities in Japan can be evaluated as the unique foreign case for practice and theory in Laos. In short, this is the study to clarify the legal issues for the development of the water pollution law in Laos. The author hopes that this work can contribute to the basis of fair, sound, and reasonable development in the future in Laos. iii Acknowledgements The achievement of this doctoral dissertation is due to many people who gave their assistance, endless support, and encouragement during this research project. First, I wish to express my appreciation for the untiring support, encouragement, and excellent guidance throughout this study provided by Professor Inaba Kazumasa, who is my main academic supervisor. He helped to shape the ideas of this study and pushed me to complete it on time. Without his expert advice and comment, I might not have graduated. Second, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Professor Ichihashi Katsuya for his considerable expertise, advice, and motivation as a sub-supervisor in the early stages of this paper. He gave crucial comment and provided an overall understanding of how to critically analyze this legal issue. I am also very grateful to Professor Fukasawa Ryuichiro, who is my sub-supervisor for his thoughtfulness and direction throughout the completion of this research project. Third, I am grateful to Okuda Saori Sensei for her kind support. I also would like to thank Professor Paul Lege for accepting me as his TA for Academic Writing II and III almost three years, along with Professor Frank Bennett for guidance on Jurism to strengthen my citations. Thanks go to all professors who have taught me at the Nagoya University since I started studying for a master’s degree in Japan in 2014. I thank Ogaki Tomoe San and the staff at the Law and Central Libraries for their service, along with the Institute for Global Law and Policy (IGLP) at Harvard Law School to accept me to present this research at the Harvard Law School, Harvard University, Massachusetts, the U.S in June 2018. Thanks go to my colleagues at the National University of Laos, Sypha Chanthavong, and others. I am grateful to the financial support provided by MEXT Scholarship. Finally, I offer my deepest gratitude and love to my family, whose devoted assistance encouraged me to continue until successful completion. My thanks finally go to all people who contributed to this doctoral dissertation that I have not thanked as mentioned above. Graduate School of Law, Nagoya University, July 26, 2019 DONKEODAVONG Latdavanh iv Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................................ i Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................ iv List of Tables .................................................................................................................................... viii Abbreviations ....................................................................................................................................