Seismotectonics of Western Canada from Regional Moment Tensor Analysis
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Seismotectonics of Western Canada From Regional Moment Tensor Analysis Johannes Peter Ristau University of Victoria 2004 Seismotectonics of Western Canada From Regional Moment Tensor Analysis Johannes Peter Ristau B.Sc., University of Manitoba, 1995 M.Sc., University of Manitoba, 1999 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the School of Earth and Ocean Sciences @ Johannes Peter Ristau, 2004 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This dissertation may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopying or other means, without permission of the author. Supervisor: Dr. Garry C. Rogers Abstract Moment tensor analysis of regional earthquakes (distances .v< 1000 km) in western Canada is now possible due to the installation of more than 40 three-component broad- band seismometers in western Canada and adjacent regions. In this study, regional moment tensor (RMT) analysis using robust waveform fitting techniques are employed to routinely caIcuIate source mechanisms, moments, and depths of earthquakes with M 2~ 4.0 in and near western Canada. This has resulted in about 10 times as many solutions per year for this region than have been calculated with teleseismic methods which are limited to earthquakes about M > 5.0. To date, more than 380 RMT solutions have been calculated in this study for west- ern Canada and adjacent regions for the years 1995-2004. These solutions provide new insights into a number of tectonic problems in western Canada. Local magnitudes (ML) have been calibrated with moment magnitudes (M,) providing a more consistent estimate of the magnitude of an earthquake. This is particularly important in the offshore region of British Columbia where RMT analysis shows that ML is underestimated by 0.3-0.7 mag- nitude units compared with M,, depending on the amount of oceanic crust present in the source-receiver travel path. This has important consequences for seismic hazard analysis and tectonic studies. Focal mechanisms from RMT solutions are also used to constrain the motions of the Explorer plate, a small oceanic plate off the coast of British Columbia. Rotation poles are calculated by leaving Pacific/Explorer motion unconstrained, and by constraining Pacific/Explorer motion using moment release rates along the Pacific/Explorer boundary. The Pacific/Explorer rotation rate decreases by a factor of 2 if Pacific/Explorer motion is constrained. This changes the convergence direction of the Explorer plate rel- ative to the North America plate from NE-SW in the unconstrained case to N-S in the constrained case. This suggests that Explorer plate motion cannot be modeled with a single rotation pole and cannot be treated as a rigid plate. The Explorer plate is likely un- dergoing intense internal deformation. The strain tensor for the Explorer plate, calculated from RMT solutions, gives a strain rate of 7.8 x yr-l in a N-S direction. Comparing moment (M,) with ML values for the northern and southern Canadian Cordillera demonstrates there is a 1:l relationship between M,, which is derived from M,, and ML. Stress tensors for the Canadian Cordillera give a NE-SW compressive stress direc- tion (gl) for most of western Canada. The northern Canadian Cordillera shows a change in a1 from E-W to N-S to NE-SW from south to north. Principal compressive strain and stress directions for the northern Canadian Cordillera have similar orientations suggesting that the earthquakes occur on faults which are favourably oriented for failure. In southern British Columbia the compressive stress regime is N-S and RMT data suggests that the N-S stress regime may extend through to the eastern Canadian Cordillera. RMT analysis will provide valuable data in the future to map the stress field in southern British Columbia. Stress tensor analysis of moment tensor and first motion solutions in the Queen Charlotte Islands region results in a local a1 azimuth of 20" which gives an angle of N 45" to the northern segment of the Queen Charlotte fault. This may suggest that the northern Queen Charlotte fault has a higher frictional strength than the San Andreas fault where angles of up to 80" are observed between a1 and the fault strike. Moment tensor solutions in the Glacier Bay region show a change in P axis orientation from N-S to E-W which could indicate that the stress field is influenced by post-glacial rebound. Contents Abstract 11.. Contents iv . List of Figures vlll.. List of Tables xviii List of Symbols xix List of Acronyms xx Acknowledgements xxi Dedication xxiii 1 Introduction 1 2 Tectonic Setting 10 2.1 Introduction . 10 2.2 Juan de Fuca Plate . 10 2.3 Pacific-North America-Juan de Fuca Triple Junction . 13 2.4 British Columbia Interior . 16 2.5 Yukon and Northwest Territories . 16 3 Seismic Moment Tensor Theory and Method 19 3.1 Introduction. 19 3.2 Seismic Moment Tensor Theory . 21 3.3 Preparing the Observed Waveforms . 26 3.4 Green's Functions . 28 3.4.1 .Calculating Green's Functions . 28 3.4.2 Earth Models ............................... 30 3.5 Intermediate Steps ................................ 33 3.6 Inversion ...................................... 34 3.7 Moment Tensor Solutions ............................ 35 4 Moment Magnitude . Local Magnitude Calibration 36 4.1 Introduction .................................... 36 4.2 The Local Magnitude Scale ........................... 37 4.3 Moment Magnitude . Local Magnitude Calibration .............. 38 4.3.1 Previous Studies ............................. 38 4.3.2 Canadian Cordillera Earthquakes .................... 38 4.3.3 Offshore Earthquakes .......................... 39 4.4 Summary ..................................... 47 5 Explorer Region Tectonics 48 5.1 Introduction .................................... 48 5.2 Calculating Rotation Poles ........................... 49 5.3 Unconstrained Pacific/Explorer Motion .................... 50 5.4 Constrained Pacific/Explorer Motion ...................... 54 5.4.1 Slip Rates From Recurrence Relations ................. 54 5.4.2 Constrained Rotation Poles ....................... 55 5.5 Explorer Plate Strain ............................... 60 5.5.1 The Strain Tensor ............................ 60 5.5.2 Explorer Plate Strain Rates ....................... 63 5.6 Summary ..................................... 67 6 Northern Canadian Cordillera Tectonics 70 6.1 Introduction .................................... 70 6.2 The Stress Tensor ................................ 73 6.3 Earthquake Focal Mechanisms, Stress. and Strain ............... 75 6.3.1 Focal Mechanisms ............................ 75 6.3.2 Stress Orientations ............................ 77 6.3.3 Strain Orientations ............................ 82 6.3.4 Comparison of Stress and Strain Orientations ............. 85 6.4 Summary ..................................... 89 7 Southern Canadian Cordillera and Vancouver Island/Puget Sound Tec- tonics 9 1 7.1 Introduction ....................................91 7.2 Southern Canadian Cordillera Seismic Activity ................ 92 7.3 CrustalStresses .................................. 95 7.3.1 Orientation of Principal Horizontal Stresses .............. 98 7.3.2 Stress Tensor Analysis ..........................101 7.4 Vancouver Island/Puget Sound Region ..................... 104 7.4.1 Crustal and In-Slab Stress Fields ....................104 7.4.2 Magnitude Comparisons ......................... 105 7.5 Summary .....................................111 8 Queen Charlotte Islands and Glacier Bay Region 114 8.1 Queen Charlotte Islands Region ......................... 114 8.1.1 Introduction ...............................114 8.1.2 Focal Mechanisms ............................116 8.1.3 Stress Analysis ..............................118 8.2 Glacier Bay Region ................................127 8.2.1 Introduction ...............................127 8.2.2 Post-Glacial Rebound And Seismicity .................127 8.3 Summary .....................................129 9 Summary 132 9.1 Introduction ....................................132 9.2 Moment Magnitude . Local Magnitude Calibration .............. 132 9.3 Explorer Region Tectonics ............................133 9.4 Northern Canadian Cordillera Tectonics ....................134 9.5 Southern Canadian Cordillera Tectonics .................... 135 9.6 Queen Charlotte Islands and Glacier Bay Region ............... 137 References 138 A Moment Tensor Solutions 151 B Waveform Fits 166 B.l 10 April 2001. 09:36 UT. Revere-Dellwood-Wilson Fault ...........166 B.2 20 May 2001. 10:04 UT. Revere-Dellwood-Wilson Fault ........... 166 B.3 14 July 1998. 01.49 UT. Sovanco Fracture Zone ................170 B.4 14 September 2001. 04:45 UT. Nootka Fault Zone ...............170 B.5 9 March 2001. 07:lO UT. Mackenzie Mountains. NWT ............ 170 B.6 9 March 2001. 19:02 UT. Mackenzie Mountains. NWT ............ 174 B.7 29 March 2001. 20:26 UT. Mackenzie Mountains. NWT ........... 174 B.8 10 June 2001. 13:19 UT. Puget Sound. Washington .............. 174 C Moment Tensor Solution Comparisons 178 C.l Green's Function Comparison ..........................178 C.2 Moment Tensor Solutions Using One Or Two Stations ............ 180 C.3 Moment Tensor Solutions For Older Events ..................183 C.3.1 10 November 2001, 20:20 UT. Sovanco Fracture Zone ......... 183 C.3.2 4 April 2002. 04:29 UT. Revere-Dellwood-Wilson Fault ........ 186 C.3.3 5 September 2002. 11:29 UT. Queen Charlotte Islands ........ 186 C.3.4 14 February 2002. 04:33 UT. Mackenzie Mountains. NWT ...... 186 C.3.5