DOCSLIB.ORG

Alaska Native Corporation Endowment Models

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

OE - SNIGAROFFRICHARDS (DO NOT DELETE) 5/10/2021 6:42 PM ALASKA NATIVE CORPORATION ENDOWMENT MODELS ROBERT SNIGAROFF* AND CRAIG RICHARDS** ABSTRACT*** New settlement trust provisions in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 have significant implications for Alaska Native Corporation (ANC) business longevity and the appropriateness of an operating business model given ANC goals as stated in their missions. The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) authorized the creation of for-profit corporations for the benefit of Alaska Native shareholders. But for Alaska Natives, cultural continuation was and continues to be a desired goal. Considering the typical life span of U.S. corporations and the inevitability of eventual failure, the for-profit corporate model is inconsistent with aspects of the ANC mission. Settlement trust amendments to ANCSA facilitate ANC cultural continuation goals solving the problem of business viability risk. We make a normative case that ANCs should consider increasing endowment business activity. We also discuss the Alaska Permanent Fund and lessons that those structuring settlement trusts might learn from literature on sovereign wealth funds and endowments. Copyright © 2021 by Robert Snigaroff and Craig Richards. * Robert Snigaroff, BS, Warner Pacific College; MBA, University of Southern California; Ph.D., University of Alaska Fairbanks, Economic Sociology. Robert Snigaroff is a shareholder and former director at both Aleut and Atxam Corporations (regional and village corporations). He leads the institutional asset management firm Denali Advisors he founded, and has published research in finance, investments, and financial economics journals. ** Craig Richards, BS in Commerce, Concentration in Finance, University of Virginia; JD, Washington & Lee University; MBA, Duke University. He is a Trustee of the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation and former Attorney General for the State of Alaska. *** Acknowledgements: Thanks to Sharon Lind, Professor at Alaska Pacific University for detailed financial data on Alaska Native Corporations that were relied on extensively throughout this article; Bruce Edwards, Sorenson and Edwards; Sarah Curtis, Holland and Knight; Julie Schrecengost, KPMG; Steve Colt, University of Alaska Anchorage; and Malan Rietveld, Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment. OE - SNIGAROFFRICHARDS (DO NOT DELETE) 5/10/2021 6:42 PM 2 ALASKA LAW REVIEW Vol. 38:1 “In the long run, we are all dead.” John Maynard Keynes1 “By the end of 2020, we will be publishing a 100 year plan that sets a foundation for future generations of Sealaska.”2 I. ANCS’ DUAL MISSION What is the purpose of the Alaska Native Corporation (ANC)?3 For publicly traded corporations, a common maxim taught in MBA programs is to maximize shareholder wealth. Milton Friedman argued, “There is one and only one social responsibility of business—to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits so long as it stays within the rules of the game, which is to say, engages in open and free competition without deception or fraud.”4 Under this rationale, companies’ first, best, and only goal should be to maximize shareholder wealth.5 The “mission statements” of companies often do not state “maximization of shareholder wealth” or profit maximization as an explicit goal. That is the goal from the perspective of economics. From the perspective of companies’ businesses, mission statements emphasize their companies’ products or services and where they fit into the marketplace, or how they serve customers. In the case of ANCs, virtually all boards and shareholders would agree that maximization of shareholder profit or wealth is not the only objective. Regional and village ANCs received title to large tracts of traditional lands as part of the settlement under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA).6 ANCs want to retain their land and desire the cultural continuation that is part and parcel with the land protection 1. JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES, A TRACT ON MONETARY REFORM 80 (London, MacMillan & Co. 1924). 2. Joe Nelson, Sealaska’s 2020 Vision and Message from Leadership, SEALASKA (Feb. 18, 2020), https://www.sealaska.com/shareholders/sealaskas-2020-vision- and-message-from-leadership/. 3. ANCs were formed under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 1971, Pub. L. No. 92-203, 85 Stat. 688 (codified as amended at 43 U.S.C. §§ 1601–29 (2018)). Although the examples in this article are from regional ANCs, most of the discussion pertains equally to village corporations. 4. Milton Friedman, The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits, NY TIMES MAG., Sept. 13, 1970, at *33. 5. Id. Hansen and Lott have a somewhat different view where externalities cause shareholders to want to maximize portfolio value. Robert G. Hansen & John R. Lott, Jr., Externalities and Corporate Objectives in a World with Diversified Shareholder/Consumers, 31 J. FIN. & QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS 43, 43 (1989). 6. Pub. L. 92-203, 85 Stat. 688 (1971) (codified in scattered chapters and sections of U.S.C.). OE - SNIGAROFFRICHARDS (DO NOT DELETE) 5/10/2021 6:42 PM 2021 ALASKA NATIVE CORP. ENDOWMENT MODELS 3 objective. This is reflected in a sampling of ANC annual reports, which often address management’s adherence to these goals in addition to financial success. Consider the mission statements of the twelve surviving regional ANCs.7 Ahtna, Incorporated: Wise stewardship of Ahtna lands and responsible economic growth for future generations of Ahtna people. Aleut Corporation: To Maximize Dividends and Opportunities for Our Shareholders. Arctic Slope Regional Corporation (ASRC): ASRC’s mission is to actively manage our businesses, our lands and resources, our investments, and our relationships to enhance Iñupiaq cultural and economic freedom - with continuity, responsibility, and integrity. Bering Straits Native Corporation (BSNC): Our mission is to improve the quality of life of our people through economic development while protecting our land and preserving our culture and heritage. Bristol Bay Native Corporation (BBNC): Our Mission: Enriching our Native way of life. Our Vision: To protect the land in the Bristol Bay region, celebrate the legacy of its people, and enhance the lives of BBNC shareholders. Calista Corporation: Increase Shareholder benefits and economic opportunities through innovation, growth, leadership, partnership, execution and financial discipline. Chugach Alaska Corporation: Committed to profitability, celebration of our heritage, and ownership of our Lands. Cook Inlet Region, Incorporated (CIRI): The mission of CIRI is to promote the economic and social well-being and Alaska Native heritage of our shareholders, now and into the future, through prudent stewardship of the company’s resources, while furthering self-sufficiency among CIRI shareholders and their families. Doyon, Limited: To continually enhance our position as a financially strong Native corporation in order to promote the economic and social well-being of our shareholders and future shareholders, to strengthen our Native way of life, and to protect and enhance our land and resources. Koniag, Incorporated: To achieve financial growth, honor our culture, protect our lands, advocate for our communities, and 7. These were obtained from ANC’s websites in April 2021. We use the same name the regional corporation refers to for itself on its webpage as of 2021. This may be different than the corporate legal name. OE - SNIGAROFFRICHARDS (DO NOT DELETE) 5/10/2021 6:42 PM 4 ALASKA LAW REVIEW Vol. 38:1 make a meaningful impact on our Koniag family. NANA Regional Corporation: To improve the quality of life for our people by maximizing economic growth, protecting and enhancing our lands, and promoting healthy communities with decisions, actions, and behaviors inspired by our Iñupiat Ilitqusiat values consistent with our core principles. Sealaska Corporation: Sealaska’s purpose is to strengthen people, culture and homelands. We have strengthened business with culture since 1972. We are a Native institution owned by more than 22,000 shareholders whose core Native values guide all that Sealaska does and represent the rich heritage of the Tlingit, Haida and Tsimshian people. We are guided by values to build excellence in our Native enterprise and take action toward our purpose. These regional ANCs aim to achieve business, operational, and financial success in order to pay dividends, etc., but also emphasize the importance of the related goals of protection of lands and continuation of culture. These community focused goals are not typical in the usual for- profit company mission statement. ANCs are unique in this regard. One commentator observes: A question like ‘I’m Doyon, what is your Native corporation?’ is now part of the Alaska Native terminology. These shareholders have a personal and emotional attachment to their corporation. They look to their ANC for job training and employment, scholarships, and burial assistance on top of their dividends. Shareholders within the same region, in many cases, have similar ethnicities, and cultural values. They may also speak their Indigenous language. Some may even characterize their collective body of shareholders as a nation state; a strange concept for those on the outside looking in on an ANC. Today’s Alaska Native shareholder may look to their ANC as part of their self-identity. The ANC, in some respects, has become a key identifier for the modern Alaska Native person.8 One can think of the above discussion as dealing with
Recommended publications
  • GAO-13-121, Regional Alaska Native Corporations: Status 40 Years After Establishment, and Future Considerations

    GAO-13-121, Regional Alaska Native Corporations: Status 40 Years After Establishment, and Future Considerations

    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters GAO December 2012 REGIONAL ALASKA NATIVE CORPORATIONS Status 40 Years after Establishment, and Future Considerations GAO-13-121 December 2012 REGIONAL ALASKA NATIVE CORPORATIONS Status 40 Years after Establishment, and Future Considerations Highlights of GAO-13-121, a report to congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found In 1971, the Alaska Native Claims Incorporated under Alaska state law, regional Alaska Native corporations share Settlement Act was enacted to resolve fundamental characteristics, although they have chosen a variety of governance long-standing aboriginal land claims practices. Like other Alaska corporations, the regional corporations are subject to and to foster economic development the state’s corporate laws (with limited exceptions) and are run by an elected for Alaska Natives. This federal law board of directors. Nevertheless, each regional corporation has chosen its own directed that corporations be created organization and governance approach in terms of board operations, executive under Alaska state law, which were to and board compensation, board elections, and shareholder involvement. be the vehicles for distributing the settlement. As directed by the act, Alaska Native corporations are subject to some financial reporting requirements 12 for-profit regional corporations were under federal and state law, but oversight of the reporting is limited. The Alaska established, representing geographical Native Claims Settlement Act generally exempts the corporations from complying regions in the state. Later, a with federal securities laws while requiring them to annually provide a report to 13th regional corporation was formed their shareholders that contains “substantially all the information” required to be to represent Alaska Natives residing included in an annual report to shareholders by U.S.
  • 45 YEARS of REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT We

    45 YEARS of REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT We

    ANCSA 1971-2016 ................................. CELEBRATING 45 YEARS OF REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT We................................... Are ANCSA ANCSA Regional Corporations, as unique as the people we represent. Arctic Slope NANA Doyon Bering Straits Calista Ahtna Chugach CIRI Bristol Bay Sealaska Koniag Aleut 2016 ANCSA Economic Report Message from ANCSA Regional Association.......................................04 Board of Directors..................................................................05 Building Sustainable Futures Celebrating 45 Years of ANCSA....................................................06 What Everyone Should Know About ANCSA Corporations. 08 Financial Results for 2011-2015.....................................................11 Alaska Regional Corporations • Mission and Business Activities Ahtna, Incorporated................................................................17 Aleut Corporation..................................................................18 Arctic Slope Regional Corporation.................................................19 Bering Straits Native Corporation..................................................20 Bristol Bay Native Corporation.....................................................21 Calista Corporation.................................................................22 Chugach Alaska Corporation.......................................................23 CIRI................................................................................24 Doyon, Limited.....................................................................25
  • One Hundred Seventh Congress of the United States of America

    One Hundred Seventh Congress of the United States of America

    S. 1325 One Hundred Seventh Congress of the United States of America AT THE SECOND SESSION Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two An Act To ratify an agreement between The Aleut Corporation and the United States of America to exchange land rights received under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act for certain land interests on Adak Island, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. FINDINGS. Congress finds that: (1) Adak Island is an isolated island located 1,200 miles southwest of Anchorage, Alaska, between the Pacific Ocean and the Bering Sea. The Island, with its unique physical and biological features, including a deep water harbor and abundant marine-associated wildlife, was recognized early for both its natural and military values. In 1913, Adak Island was reserved and set aside as a Preserve because of its value to seabirds, marine mammals, and fisheries. Withdrawals of portions of Adak Island for various military purposes date back to 1901 and culminated in the 1959 withdrawal of approximately half of the Island for use by the Department of the Navy for military purposes. (2) By 1990, military development on Adak Island sup- ported a community of 6,000 residents. Outside of the Adak Naval Complex, there was no independent community on Adak Island. (3) As a result of the Defense Base Closure and Realign- ment Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 1808), as amended, the Adak Naval Complex has been closed by the Department of Defense.
  • Regulatory Impact Review / Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis to Amend Regulations for Participants in the Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands Regulatory Areas

    Regulatory Impact Review / Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis to Amend Regulations for Participants in the Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands Regulatory Areas

    Regulatory Impact Review / Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis to Amend Regulations for Participants in the Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands Regulatory Areas. COST RECOVERY FROM AMENDMENT 80, GROUNDFISH AND HALIBUT/SABLEFISH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT QUOTA, AMERICAN FISHERIES ACT AND ALEUTIAN ISLANDS POLLOCK QUOTA RECIPIENTS, AND THE FREEZER LONGLINE COALITION Second Review Draft September 2013 Lead Agency: National Marine Fisheries Service, Alaska Region National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Responsible Official: James Balsiger, Administrator Alaska Regional Office, National Marine Fisheries Service For further information contact: X, National Marine Fisheries Service, Alaska Region P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802 (907) 586-XXXX Abstract: This document is a Regulatory Impact Review/Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis analyzing implementation of a cost recovery program from the Amendment 80 program, the groundfish and halibut/sablefish Community Development program, the American Fisheries Act program, and the Freezer Longline Coalition. The measures under consideration would define the fee structure to collect of up to 3 percent of the ex-vessel value of species allocated to participants in these programs. The fee paid by beneficiaries of each program would offset the actual costs agencies incur that are directly related to the management, data collection, and enforcement of each program that would not have been incurred had the program not been implemented. i Executive Summary The proposed actions would, first, implement a Limited Access Permit (LAP) program cost recovery fee for the American Fisheries Act (AFA) and Aleutian Islands (AI) pollock, Amendment 80, Community Development Quota (CDQ) program for halibut and groundfish, and the Freezer Longline Coalition (FLC) for Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (BSAI) Pacific cod, programs as required under the MSA.
  • Alaska Native

    Alaska Native

    To conduct a simple search of the many GENERAL records of Alaska’ Native People in the National Archives Online Catalog use the search term Alaska Native. To search specific areas or villages see indexes and information below. Alaska Native Villages by Name A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Alaska is home to 229 federally recognized Alaska Native Villages located across a wide geographic area, whose records are as diverse as the people themselves. Customs, culture, artwork, and native language often differ dramatically from one community to another. Some are nestled within large communities while others are small and remote. Some are urbanized while others practice subsistence living. Still, there are fundamental relationships that have endured for thousands of years. One approach to understanding links between Alaska Native communities is to group them by language. This helps the student or researcher to locate related communities in a way not possible by other means. It also helps to define geographic areas in the huge expanse that is Alaska. For a map of Alaska Native language areas, see the generalized map of Alaska Native Language Areas produced by the University of Alaska at Fairbanks. Click on a specific language below to see Alaska federally recognized communities identified with each language. Alaska Native Language Groups (click to access associated Alaska Native Villages) Athabascan Eyak Tlingit Aleut Eskimo Haida Tsimshian Communities Ahtna Inupiaq with Mixed Deg Hit’an Nanamiut Language Dena’ina (Tanaina)
  • Sharon Guenther Lind 907-786-4166 Term Assistant Professor College of Business and Public Policy

    Sharon Guenther Lind 907-786-4166 Term Assistant Professor College of Business and Public Policy

    Sharon Guenther Lind 907-786-4166 Term Assistant Professor College of Business and Public Policy Bio - Sharon Guenther Lind Lind is an Aleut born and raised in Kenai, Alaska. Lind's area of study is the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) and the Alaska Native corporations it created. Lind has been involved with the management of the Aleut Corporation since the early 90's in many different roles, from management to board member. From 2006 - 2011, Lind led the company as Chairman of the Board. She is also a shareholder of the Axtam Corporation, the Atka village corporation. Lind acquired her MBA from the University ofAlaska Anchorage and is currently pursuing her PhD in Indigenous studies with a concentration in Indigenous leadership at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. Currently Lind teaches undergraduate Organizational Behavior and classes within the newly developed Alaska Native Business Management minor area; a minor Lind helped create in UAA's College of Business and Public Policy. Education ~ Accepted into the University of Alaska Fairbanks PhD program Spring 2013. Pursuing a PhD from the UAF Rural Development Indigenous Studies program. ~ Master's in Business Administration, University of Alaska Anchorage ~ BS Business Administration with minor in mathematics and an emphasis in management, Warner Pacific College, Portland, Oregon. Papers: Co-Authored with Dr. George Geistauts 'The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act Corporation: A Case Example for Indigenous Peoples' Business Development?" and presented the paper at the Annual Hawaii International Business Research Conference and the 2013 First Annual Alaska Native Studies Conference: Transforming the University in the 21 51 Century.
  • Read More About Arctic and International Relations Series Here

    Read More About Arctic and International Relations Series Here

    Fall 2018, Issue 6 ISSN 2470-7414 Arctic and International Relations Series Bridging the Gap between Arctic Indigenous Communities and Arctic Policy: Unalaska, the Aleutian Islands, and the Aleut International Association EAST ASIA CENTER Contents PART 1: INTRODUCTIONS AND OVERVIEW 5 Bridging the Gap between Arctic Indigenous Communities and Arctic Policy: Unalaska, the Aleutian Islands, and the Aleut International Association Nadine Fabbi 6 South Korea’s Role as an Observer State on the Arctic Council and Its Contribution to Arctic Indigenous Societies 10 Minsu Kim Introduction to the Aleut International Association 16 Liza Mack Aleut vs. Unangan: Two Notes on Naming 18 Qawalangin Tribal Council of Unalaska Shayla Shaishnikoff PART 2: UNALASKA HISTORY AND ALEUT GOVERNANCE 21 Unalaska and Its Role in the Fisheries: Resources of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands 22 Frank Kelty The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, Tribes, and the Alaska National Interest Land Conservation Act 25 Liza Mack Qawalangin Tribal Council of Unalaska 30 Tom Robinson with Joanne Muzak Qawalangin Tribal Council of Unalaska’s Environmental Department 33 Chris Price with Joanne Muzak My Internship at the Qawalangin Tribe 37 Shayla Shaishnikoff A Brief History of Unalaska and the Work of the Ounalashka Corporation 38 Denise M. Rankin The Work of the Aleut International Association 41 Liza Mack PART 3: UNALASKA: PLACE AND PEOPLE 43 The Flora of Unalaska and Unangan Use of Plants 44 Sharon Svarny-Livingston Fresh, Delicious Lettuce in Unalaska: Meet Blaine and Catina
  • Alaska Area Native Health Service: Description of the Program

    Alaska Area Native Health Service: Description of the Program

    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Health Sciences Center Archives and Special Native Health Database Full Text Collections 1979 Alaska Area Native Health Service: description of the program. Indian Health Service, Alaska Area Native Health Service Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nhd Recommended Citation Indian Health Service, Alaska Area Native Health Service, Anchorage, AK. Alaska Area Native Health Service: description of the program. 1979 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Health Sciences Center Archives and Special Collections at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Native Health Database Full Text by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. '/10 };J13 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROGRAM ALASKA ·AREA NATIVE HEALTH SERVICE Department'ofHealth & ryelfat'.e Publ'c Health Service • Health Services Administration . \ Indian H~ltb~t'liit~~ llaskaAreaNative Health Se;vice '~ - - ,..­ • , .,a About this publication. • • • The Alaska Area Native Health Service has prepared this publication to provide current informa­ tion on the health status of the Alaska Native people and the programs which the Alaska Area Native Health Service are working with to fill those needs. Exciting developments and innovations have taken place in the Health Care Delivery Program. The Community Health Aide Program has proven to be one of the most accepted and cost effec­ tive programs developed in recent years in Alaska. Increased efforts have been made in the area of consumer involvement and participation in the Health Care Program. The Alaska Area Native Health Service has been instrumental in assisting the development of Regional Health Corpora­ tions in the 12 regional areas of Alaska.
  • Conclusions, Bibliography

    Conclusions, Bibliography

    Conclusions After the Attuans were taken to Japan, their village was occupied by Japanese troops and was destroyed by American bombing (Garfield 1995:213–214). On other parts of the island, the U.S. military left behind the remains of structures including tunnels used for storage. In 1987 a “peace memorial” was installed to honor all the soldiers who died at Attu, and in 1993 a sign was placed to commemorate the Attu villagers’ wartime ordeal. The island of Attu has remained uninhabited. There is nothing left of the wooden houses, the school, church, or the barabaras that were still in use in 1942. A Coast Guard Loran (long-range navigation system) station operated there in 1961 and was staffed by 20 personnel. It was closed in 2010 after the Global Positioning System (GPS) replaced Loran as a navigational system for ships and aircraft. As Jennifer Jolis wrote almost two decades ago, Periodically the island is visited by fishermen or by interested naturalists, biologists, and archeologists, usually in the employ of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The buildings and bridges built by the Navy are disappearing, each year the wind and waves take back the land. Each spring the grasses continue to wave, the eiders to sound their lonely calls. A lone eagle flies over Temnac Valley. The people are gone. The island remains. ( Jolis 1994:30). Commentary 145 Bibliography Bank II, Ted 1956 Birthplace of the Winds. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Co. Bateman, Annaliese Jacobs 2005 Aleutian Atlantis: Travel, Tragedy, and the Tricks of Memory on Attu Island, 1936-1945.
  • Alaska Peninsula Bibliography of Geological Research Ric Wilson, USGS Anchorage, AK from Open File Report 1986 Updated, but Not Necessarily Complete for 1986-1990

    Alaska Peninsula Bibliography of Geological Research Ric Wilson, USGS Anchorage, AK from Open File Report 1986 Updated, but Not Necessarily Complete for 1986-1990

    Alaska Peninsula Bibliography of Geological Research Ric Wilson, USGS Anchorage, AK From Open File Report 1986 Updated, but not necessarily complete for 1986-1990 "Abbot, C.G., and Fowle, F.E., 1913, Volcanoes and climate: Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, v. 60, no. 29, 24 p." "Abrahamson, S.R., 1949, Geography of the Naknek region, Alaska: Worcester, Mass., Clark University, Ph.D. dissertation, 148 p." "Addicott, W.O., 1971, Tertiary marine mollusks of Alaska: An annotated bibliography: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1343, 30 p. "Addicott, W.O., 1973, Neogene marine mollusks of the Pacific coast of North America: An annotated bibliography, 1797-1969: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1362, 210 p." "Addicott, W.O., 1977, Significance of pectinids in Tertiary biochronology of the Pacific Northwest states [abs.]: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 9, no. 7, p. 874." "Alaska Construction and Oil, 1984, Petroleum update: Alaska Construction and Oil, v. 25, no. 8, p. 164." "Alaska Construction and Oil, 1984, Unga Island mining data announced: Alaska Construction and Oil, v. 25, no. 3, p. 31." "Alaska Department of Mines, 1949, Report of the Commissioner of Mines for the Biennium ended December 31, 1948: Alaska Department of Mines, 50 p." "Alaska Department of Mines, 1951, Report of the Commissioner of Mines for the Biennium ended December 31, 1950: Alaska Department of Mines, 57 p." "Alaska Department of Mines, 1953, Report of the Commissioner of Mines for the Biennium ended December 31, 1952: Alaska Department
  • Sealaska and Central Council Hold Joint Meeting to Advance Dialogue

    Sealaska and Central Council Hold Joint Meeting to Advance Dialogue

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE October 23, 2015 Sealaska and Central Council Hold Joint Meeting to Advance Dialogue on Common Issues Sealaska and Central Council of the Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska (Central Council) leadership met on October 15, 2015 in Anchorage, Alaska to advance a memorandum of understanding (MOU) and to discuss a resolution on discretionary voting adopted by the Central Council’s Tribal Assembly (TA) in April. The 2009 MOU between Sealaska and Central Council provides guidance on business opportunities that meet mutual objectives, including exploring business partnerships and investment opportunities in the region. Both entities agree an updated MOU should include non-business services and coordinated efforts between staff and common departments such as communications and natural resources. “Sealaska along with Central Council envision a more collaborative relationship that effectively utilizes resources of each entity for meaningful benefits to shareholders and tribal citizens we serve,” said Sealaska President and CEO Anthony Mallott. “We both have also been meeting regularly with SEARHC CEO Charles Clement and Tlingit-Haida Regional Housing Authority President and CEO Ricardo Worl over the last year. By aligning our resources, we all can benefit the region sustainably. At the Anchorage meeting, Central Council and Sealaska leadership immediately agreed to support the finalization of a land agreement for the five “landless” communities in Southeast Alaska and pass the Alaska Native Veterans Land Allotment Equity Act." “One of my first priorities after taking office in 2014 was to establish meaningful relationships and opportunities for partnerships with our tribes, corporations, and Native organizations,” said President Richard Peterson.
  • C. Benefits from Alaska Native Corporations

    C. Benefits from Alaska Native Corporations

    Benefits of ANCSA and SBA 8(a) Program Benefits from Alaska Native Corporations C. Benefits from Alaska Native Corporations Overview of Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) Corporations In 1971, for a number of reasons including enabling the permitting and construction of the TransAlaska pipeline, Congress passed the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA). (The article “Alaska Claims Settlement Act at 35” (Linxwiler, 2007, Tab C.1) provides more detail on the purposes and provisions of the Act.) The act ended the lands claims struggle but set in motion a new process: the establishment of business corporations, owned by Alaska Natives, to manage their claims settlement of nearly $1 billion and 44 million acres. Twelve regional and more than 200 village corporations were organized soon after the act was passed, and by 1973 about 75,000 Alaska Native had enrolled as shareholders. (A thirteenth corporation was later organized for Alaska Natives not residing in the state.) The ANSCA corporations (ANC) were given the broad but elusive task of benefiting their shareholders and future generations of Natives. But the form those benefits ought to take, and how to generate them, was not clear. The shareholders, Congress, and others expected the corporations to do everything from earning profits and creating jobs to improving conditions in the villages and protecting subsistence resources. A 1991 report by Steve Colt, Financial Performance of Native Regional Corporations (Tab C.2), showed that while all the regional corporations survived their first 20 years, several did just barely (Figure 1). In their first twenty years, the regional corporations earned a combined average annual return on equity of negative 3.9%, notwithstanding the very substantial natural resource sales that took place in that period.