Immunoelectron-Microscopic Studies of Endoplasmic Reticulum-Golgi Relationships in the Intracellular Transport Process of Lipoprotein Particles in Rat Hepatocytes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Endomembrane System and Proteins
Chapter 4 | Cell Structure 121 Endosymbiosis We have mentioned that both mitochondria and chloroplasts contain DNA and ribosomes. Have you wondered why? Strong evidence points to endosymbiosis as the explanation. Symbiosis is a relationship in which organisms from two separate species depend on each other for their survival. Endosymbiosis (endo- = “within”) is a mutually beneficial relationship in which one organism lives inside the other. Endosymbiotic relationships abound in nature. We have already mentioned that microbes that produce vitamin K live inside the human gut. This relationship is beneficial for us because we are unable to synthesize vitamin K. It is also beneficial for the microbes because they are protected from other organisms and from drying out, and they receive abundant food from the environment of the large intestine. Scientists have long noticed that bacteria, mitochondria, and chloroplasts are similar in size. We also know that bacteria have DNA and ribosomes, just like mitochondria and chloroplasts. Scientists believe that host cells and bacteria formed an endosymbiotic relationship when the host cells ingested both aerobic and autotrophic bacteria (cyanobacteria) but did not destroy them. Through many millions of years of evolution, these ingested bacteria became more specialized in their functions, with the aerobic bacteria becoming mitochondria and the autotrophic bacteria becoming chloroplasts. The Central Vacuole Previously, we mentioned vacuoles as essential components of plant cells. If you look at Figure 4.8b, you will see that plant cells each have a large central vacuole that occupies most of the cell's area. The central vacuole plays a key role in regulating the cell’s concentration of water in changing environmental conditions. -
Intracellular Transport of Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin to the Apical Surface of Madin-Darby Canine Kidney Cells
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by PubMed Central Intracellular Transport of Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin to the Apical Surface of Madin-Darby Canine Kidney Cells ENRIQUE RODRIGUEZ-BOULAN, KEVIN T . PASKIET, PEDRO J. I . SALAS, and ENZO BARD Department of Pathology, Downstate Medical Center, State University of New York, Brooklyn, New York 11203 ABSTRACT The intracellular pathway followed by the influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) to the apical surface of Madin-Darby canine kidney cells was studied by radioimmunoassay, immunofluorescence, and immunoelectron microscopy. To synchronize the migration, we used a temperature-sensitive mutant of influenza WSN, ts61, which, at the nonpermissive temperature, 39.5°C, exhibits a defect in the HA that prevents its exit from the endoplasmic reticulum . Upon transfer to permissive temperature, 32°C, the HA appeared in the Golgi apparatus after 10 min, and on the apical surface after 30-40 min. In the presence of cycloheximide, the expression was not inhibited, indicating that the is defect is reversible; a wave of HA migrated to the cell surface, where it accumulated with a half time of 60 min . After passage through the Golgi apparatus the HA was detected in a population of smooth vesicles, about twice the size of coated vesicles, located in the apical half of the cytoplasm . These HA-containing vesicles did not react with anti-clathrin antibodies . Monensin (10 'UM) delayed the surface appearance of HA by 2 h, but not the transport to the Golgi apparatus. Incubation at 20°C retarded the migration to the Golgi apparatus by ^-30 min and blocked the surface appearance by acting at a late stage in the intracellular pathway, presumably at the level of the post-Golgi vesicles. -
The Mechanics of Intracellular Transport
Developmental Cell Previews Cutting through the Noise: The Mechanics of Intracellular Transport Samantha Stam1,2 and Margaret L. Gardel2,3,* 1Biophysical Sciences Graduate Program, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA 2James Franck Institute and Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA 3Department of Physics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA *Correspondence: [email protected] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2014.08.013 Intracellular transport of organelles and proteins is driven by multiple ATP-dependent processes. Recently in Cell, Guo et al. (2014) developed a technique, force-spectrum microscopy, to measure intracellular forces and demonstrate that large motion of cellular components can be produced by random ATP-dependent fluc- tuations within the cytoplasm. Intracellular transport is crucial to diverse mechanisms, and they overcome the Here, Guo et al. (2014) provide the physiological tasks. The cell employs limitations of diffusive transport in at first measurements to directly charac- multiple mechanisms to meet the de- least two distinct ways. One well-appre- terize these ATP-dependent yet random mands of rapidly transporting cell con- ciated mechanism is that molecular forces within the cytoplasm. The authors tents of varying size over large distances, motor proteins drive directed transport measured the mechanics of the cyto- ranging from microns to up to a meter, to of attached cargo along filament tracks plasm using optical tweezers to apply support specific physiological tasks (Figure 1C, blue and black) (Howard, forces to inert particles microinjected (Figure 1A). In a recent issue of Cell, Guo 2001). Motors transport cargo along into the cytoplasm. -
Fluorescence Microscopy Applied to Intracellular Transport by Microtubule Motors
J Biosci Vol. 43, No. 3, July 2018, pp. 437–445 Ó Indian Academy of Sciences DOI: 10.1007/s12038-018-9765-2 Fluorescence microscopy applied to intracellular transport by microtubule motors 1 2 1 DIVYA PATHAK ,SHREYASI THAKUR and ROOP MALLIK * 1Department of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai 400005, India 2Department of Physiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA *Corresponding author (Email, [email protected]) Published online: 25 May 2018 Long-distance transport of many organelles inside eukaryotic cells is driven by the dynein and kinesin motors on microtubule filaments. More than 30 years since the discovery of these motors, unanswered questions include motor– organelle selectivity, structural determinants of processivity, collective behaviour of motors and track selection within the complex cytoskeletal architecture, to name a few. Fluorescence microscopy has been invaluable in addressing some of these questions. Here we present a review of some efforts to understand these sub-microscopic machines using fluorescence. Keywords. Dynein; fluorescence; kinesin; motor proteins; myosin 1. Background observe motors navigating the complex cytoskeleton. Fluo- rescent labelling also shows that both dynein and kinesin are Intracellular transport of vesicles was first inferred from present on the cargo, but how do these antagonistic motors ligatures of sciatic nerve where swelling was observed on work together is a matter of much debate (Hancock 2014). either sides of the ligature (Grafstein -
Reflux of Endoplasmic Reticulum Proteins to the Cytosol Yields Inactivation of Tumor Suppressors
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.13.038935; this version posted April 13, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Reflux of Endoplasmic Reticulum proteins to the cytosol yields inactivation of tumor suppressors Daria Sicari1,2, Raphael Pineau1,2, Pierre-Jean Le Reste1,2,3, Luc Negroni4,5,6,7, Sophie Chat8, Aiman Mohtar9, Daniel Thomas8, Reynald Gillet8, M. Ted Hupp9,10, Eric Chevet1,2* and Aeid Igbaria1,2,11* 1Inserm U1242, University of Rennes, Rennes, France. 2Centre de lutte contre le cancer Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France. 3Neurosurgery Dept, University Hospital of Rennes, 35000 Rennes, France. 4Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, 67404 Illkirch, France. 5Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR7104, 67404 Illkirch, France. 6Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, U1258, 67404 Illkirch, France. 7Université de Strasbourg, 67404 Illkirch, France. 8Univ. Rennes, CNRS, Institut de Génétique et Développement de Rennes (IGDR) UMR6290, 35000 Rennes, France. 9Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre at the Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, UK. 10International Centre for Cancer Vaccine Science, Gdansk, Poland. 11Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 8410501, Israel. *Correspondence: [email protected], or [email protected] ABSTRACT: In the past decades many studies reported Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) resident proteins to localize to the cytosol but the mechanisms by which this occurs and whether these proteins exert cytosolic functions remain unknown. We found that select ER luminal proteins accumulate in the cytosol of glioblastoma cells isolated from mouse and human tumors. -
Intracellular Transport in Eukaryotes
Intracellular transport in eukaryotes Overview Compartmentalization and inner membranes enables eukaryotic cells • to be 1000-10000 times larger than prokaryotes • to isolate specialized chemical processes in specific parts of the cell • to produce “packages” (vesicles) of chemical components that can be shuttled around the cell actively Membrane-enclosed organelles take up ~50% of the volume of eukaryotic cells: • nucleus – genomic function • endoplasmic reticulum – synthesis of lipids; on the border with the cytosol, synthesis of proteins destined for many organelles and the plasma membrane • Golgi apparatus – modification, sorting, and packaging of proteins and lipids for specific intracellular destination (akin to a mail sort facility) • lysosomes – degradation • endosomes – sorting of endocytosed (engulfed) material by the cell • peroxisomes – oxidation of toxic species • mitochondria , chloroplasts – energy conversion Cells contain ͥͤ ͥͦ protein molecules that are constantly being synthesized and 10 Ǝ 10 degraded Proteins are synthesized in the cytosol , but not all proteins remain there and many must be transported to the appropriate compartment For comparison: transport by diffusion Even without active transport requiring free energy transduction, movement of molecules in the cell is rapid by diffusive motion © M. S. Shell 2009 1/11 last modified 10/27/2010 Consider a sea of molecules. Pinpoint one molecule and note its starting position at time 0. Due to thermal motion, the particle on average makes a random jump of length every units ͠ of time. The jump is random in the radial direction. This is called a random walk . Repeat this process for many jumps n and interrogate the final distance of the particle from its starting point ͦ ͠ We could imagine doing many such experiments. -
ER-Phagy at a Glance Paolo Grumati1,*, Ivan Dikic1,2,‡ and Alexandra Stolz2,*
© 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Cell Science (2018) 131, jcs217364. doi:10.1242/jcs.217364 CELL SCIENCE AT A GLANCE ER-phagy at a glance Paolo Grumati1,*, Ivan Dikic1,2,‡ and Alexandra Stolz2,* ABSTRACT function in response to ER stress signals. This task sharing reflects Selective autophagy represents the major quality control mechanism the complexity of the ER in terms of biological functions and that ensures proper turnover of exhausted or harmful organelles, morphology. In this Cell Science at a Glance article and the among them the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), which is fragmented accompanying poster, we summarize the most recent findings and delivered to the lysosome for degradation via a specific type of about ER-phagy in yeast and in mammalian cells. autophagy called ER-phagy. The recent discovery of ER-resident KEY WORDS: Autophagy, CCPG1, FAM134B, RTN3, SEC62, proteins that bind to mammalian Atg8 proteins has revealed that the Endoplasmic reticulum selective elimination of ER involves different receptors that are specific for different ER subdomains or ER stresses. FAM134B (also known as RETREG1) and RTN3 are reticulon-type proteins that are Introduction able to remodel the ER network and ensure the basal membrane The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is the largest membrane-bound turnover. SEC62 and CCPG1 are transmembrane ER receptors that organelle in eukaryotic cells. Its complex morphology, which involves sheets, tubules and matrices (Chen et al., 2013; Friedman and Voeltz, 2011; Nixon-Abell et al., 2016), mirrors its diverse roles 1Institute of Biochemistry II, Goethe University Frankfurt - Medical Faculty, in a variety of physiological processes including autophagy University Hospital, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. -
Profile of Peter Novick
PROFILE PROFILE Profile of Peter Novick Sandeep Ravindran Science Writer There was a time in graduate school when a combination of yeast genetics and cell Peter Novick wasn’tsureifhisresearch biology, he has spent his career investigating wouldleadanywhere.Asagraduatestudent the tightly regulated mechanisms involved in in cell biologist Randy Schekman’s laboratory intracellular transport. For his contributions at the University of California at Berkeley, to our understanding of this fundamental Novick had been using a genetic approach physiological process, Novick was elected to to understand the yeast secretory pathway, the National Academy of Sciences in 2013. responsible for moving proteins out of the “In his own lab, first at Yale and now at cell. Now a professor at the University of UC San Diego, Peter launched a brilliant in- California, San Diego, Novick says it was only dependent career with the discovery that a when he identified a mutant in which vesicles protein called Sec4 encodes a small GTP- piledupinsidethecell,showingthatithad binding protein, the first of three dozen so- a defective secretory pathway, that he knew called Rab proteins that we now know con- he had made a breakthrough. “That con- trol the targeting of transport vesicles to all vinced me. Before then I wasn’tsureifI the many destinations in the cell,” says had a thesis project, afterwards it was pretty Schekman. “On the strength of this work clear I did,” he says. and much more in subsequent years, he It turned out that Novick had a lot more was elected to the National Academy of Sci- than a thesis project. -
Endomembrane System
Cell Structure & Function Cell Theory Cells are fundamental to biology Cells are the basic living units within organisms (all chemical rxns. of life take place within cells) All organisms are made of cells Single-celled organisms (bacteria/protists) Multicellular organisms (plants/animals/fungi) Cell Structure & Function Basic Aspects of Cell Structure & Function Plasma membrane Lipid bilayer Proteins DNA-containing region Cytoplasm Eukaryotic v. Prokaryotic cells Prokaryotic v. Eukaryotic Cells Two major classes of cells Prokaryotic cells (pro-, “before”) Cell lacks a “true” nucleus DNA is coiled in a nucleoid region Cells lack nuclear membrane Prokaryotic v. Eukaryotic Cells [attachment structure] [DNA location] [organelles that synthesize proteins] [enclosing the cytoplasm] [rigid structure outside the p.m. ] [jelly-like outer coating] [locomotion organelle] Prokaryotic v. Eukaryotic Cells Eukaryotic cells (eu-, “true”) Nucleus contains most of the cells nuclear material, DNA usually the largest organelle Bordered by a membranous envelope Prokaryotic v. Eukaryotic Cells Plant v. Animal Cells Both contain Plasma membrane (functions as a selective barrier) Nucleus (gene-containing organelle) Cytoplasm (region between nucleus and p.m.) Consists of organelles in a fluid (cytosol) Prokaryotic v. Eukaryotic Cells Plant v. Animal Cells Organelles Bordered by internal membranes Compartmentalizes the functions of a cell Maintains organelle’s unique environment Most organelles are found in both plant and animal cells Plant v. Animal Cells -
ER-Phagy and Its Role in ER Homeostasis in Plants
plants Review ER-Phagy and Its Role in ER Homeostasis in Plants Yan Bao 1,2,* and Diane C. Bassham 1,* 1 Department of Genetics, Development and Cell Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA 2 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] (Y.B.); [email protected] (D.C.B.) Received: 19 November 2020; Accepted: 11 December 2020; Published: 14 December 2020 Abstract: The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is the largest continuous membrane-bound cellular organelle and plays a central role in the biosynthesis of lipids and proteins and their distribution to other organelles. Autophagy is a conserved process that is required for recycling unwanted cellular components. Recent studies have implicated the ER as a membrane source for the formation of autophagosomes, vesicles that transport material to the vacuole during autophagy. When unfolded proteins accumulate in the ER and/or the ER lipid bilayer is disrupted, a condition known as ER stress results. During ER stress, ER membranes can also be engulfed through autophagy in a process termed ER-phagy. An interplay between ER stress responses and autophagy thus maintains the functions of the ER to allow cellular survival. In this review, we discuss recent progress in understanding ER-phagy in plants, including identification of regulatory factors and selective autophagy receptors. We also identify key unanswered questions in plant ER-phagy for future study. Keywords: autophagy; endoplasmic reticulum; ER stress; ER-phagy; unfolded protein response 1. Introduction Plants live in a world of ever-changing conditions; for survival, they need to adapt to the challenges of their surroundings to balance growth and stress responses [1,2]. -
And Cytosolic Proteases Endoplasmic Reticulum Aminopeptidase 1
Processing of a Class I-Restricted Epitope from Tyrosinase Requires Peptide N -Glycanase and the Cooperative Action of Endoplasmic Reticulum Aminopeptidase 1 This information is current as and Cytosolic Proteases of September 28, 2021. Michelle L. Altrich-VanLith, Marina Ostankovitch, Joy M. Polefrone, Claudio A. Mosse, Jeffrey Shabanowitz, Donald F. Hunt and Victor H. Engelhard J Immunol 2006; 177:5440-5450; ; Downloaded from doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.8.5440 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/177/8/5440 http://www.jimmunol.org/ References This article cites 45 articles, 25 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/177/8/5440.full#ref-list-1 Why The JI? Submit online. • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision by guest on September 28, 2021 • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2006 by The American Association of Immunologists All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. The Journal of Immunology Processing of a Class I-Restricted Epitope from Tyrosinase Requires Peptide N-Glycanase and the Cooperative Action of Endoplasmic Reticulum Aminopeptidase 1 and Cytosolic Proteases1 Michelle L. -
A Signal-Anchor Sequence Stimulates Signal Recognition Particle Binding to Ribosomes from Inside the Exit Tunnel
A signal-anchor sequence stimulates signal recognition particle binding to ribosomes from inside the exit tunnel Uta Berndta,b,1, Stefan Oellerera,b,c,1, Ying Zhanga,b,c, Arthur E. Johnsond, and Sabine Rosperta,b,2 aInstitute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and bCenter for Biological Signalling Studies, University of Freiburg, Stefan-Meier-Strasse 17, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany; cFakulta¨t fu¨ r Biologie, University of Freiburg, Scha¨nzlestrasse 1, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany; and dDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 116 Reynolds Medical Building, College Station, TX 77843 Edited by Arthur Horwich, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, and approved December 15, 2008 (received for review August 29, 2008) Sorting of eukaryotic membrane and secretory proteins depends direct interaction between SRP and the nascent chain. Previous on recognition of ribosome-bound nascent chain signal sequences studies have addressed the question of whether or not specific by the signal recognition particle (SRP). The current model suggests amino acid sequences of segments inside the tunnel can further that the SRP cycle is initiated when a signal sequence emerges from the affinity of SRP for RNCs (9, 10). Because signal sequences the ribosomal tunnel and binds to SRP. Then elongation is slowed would be prime candidates for such effects, this possibility was until the SRP-bound ribosome–nascent chain complex (RNC) is tested in the eukaryotic system by using RNCs carrying prep- targeted to the SRP receptor in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) rolactin, a secreted protein with a cleavable signal sequence. membrane. The RNC is then transferred to the translocon, SRP is However, when nascent preprolactin was too short to exit the released, and translation resumes.