DOCSLIB.ORG

Total Maximum Daily Load for Dissolved Oxygen in the Grand River, Red Cedar River, and Tributaries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Total Maximum Daily Load for Dissolved Oxygen in the Grand River, Red Cedar River, and Tributaries DRAFT Total Maximum Daily Load for Dissolved Oxygen in the Grand River, Red Cedar River, and Tributaries Ingham, Eaton, and Clinton Counties Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division June 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. v 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Problem Statement ......................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Background .................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Numeric Target ............................................................................................................... 5 2.0 DATA DISCUSSION .............................................................................................................. 6 2.1 Instantaneous (Grab) DO Measurements ...................................................................... 8 2.2 Continuous Sonde Data ................................................................................................. 9 3.0 LINKAGE ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................ 9 4.0 SOURCE ASSESSMENT ..................................................................................................... 11 4.1 NPDES Discharges ..................................................................................................... 12 4.2. Nonpoint Sources ....................................................................................................... 14 5.0 GRRC MODEL DEVELOPMENT ......................................................................................... 15 5.1 Data Used in the GRRC Model ................................................................................... 16 5.2 Selection of Low Flow Critical Period .......................................................................... 16 5.3 Current Loading .......................................................................................................... 16 5.4 Loading Scenarios ...................................................................................................... 17 6.0 LCs AND LAs ...................................................................................................................... 17 6.1. WLA ............................................................................................................................ 18 6.2 LA ................................................................................................................................ 19 6.3 Summary of Allocations .............................................................................................. 20 6.4. MOS ............................................................................................................................ 22 6.5 Seasonality ................................................................................................................. 22 7.0 REASONABLE ASSURANCE ............................................................................................ 22 7.1 NPDES Permits ........................................................................................................... 22 7.2 Nonpoint Sources ........................................................................................................ 25 8.0 IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................... 28 9.0 FUTURE MONITORING ...................................................................................................... 29 10.0 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION .................................................................................................. 30 11.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................... 31 ii TABLES Table 1: Grand River and Red Cedar River DO grab sampling and continuous 2012 monitoring locations ................................................................................................ 34 Table 2: Grand River a.m. and p.m. grab sampling results, August 31, 2010 ....................... 35 Table 3: Red Cedar River a.m. and p.m. grab sampling results, September 1, 2010 ........... 35 Table 4: Grand River and Red Cedar River a.m. and p.m. grab sampling results, September 2, 2010 .................................................................................................. 36 Table 5: Red Cedar River a.m. and p.m. grab sampling results, September 8, 2010 ........... 36 Table 6: Red Cedar River a.m. and p.m. grab sampling results, August 6, 2012 ................. 37 Table 7: Grand River a.m. and p.m. grab sampling results, August 7, 2012 ......................... 37 Table 8: Red Cedar River a.m. and p.m. grab sampling results, August 14, 2012 ............... 38 Table 9: Grand River a.m. and p.m. grab sampling results, August 15, 2012 ....................... 38 Table 10: Summary of point sources of conventional pollutants to the Grand River and Red Cedar River near Lansing ......................................................................... 39 Table 11: DMR data. Municipal discharges to the Grand River near Lansing, August 2012 ............................................................................................................ 39 Table 12: DMR data. Municipal discharge to the Red Cedar River near Lansing, August 2012 ............................................................................................................ 39 Table 13: Point source permits for the TMDL area.................................................................. 40 Table 14: Diurnal value in the Grand River at Webster Road over the 2012 GRRC Study, August 1-11, 2012 ............................................................................ 43 Table 15: Diurnal value in the Red Cedar River at River Point Park over the 2012 GRRC study, August 1-15, 2012 ............................................................................. 43 FIGURES Figure 1: ......... Original TMDL reach ............................................................................................... 44 Figure 2: ......... Modified (impaired) TMDL reach ............................................................................. 45 Figure 3: ......... Upper Grand River watershed source area/GRRC TMDL area .............................. 46 Figure 4: ......... 2012 GRRC TMDL area and river reach ................................................................. 47 Figure 5: ......... Landcover dataset for the GRRC TMDL area ......................................................... 48 Figure 6: ......... Grand River grab sampling site locations ................................................................ 49 Figure 7: ......... Red Cedar River grab sampling site locations ........................................................ 50 Figure 8: ......... DO and temperature at RMPs on the Grand River, August 7, 2012 ....................... 50 Figure 9: ......... DO and temperature at RMPs on the Grand River, August 15, 2012 ..................... 51 Figure 10: ....... DO and temperature at RMPs on the Red Cedar River, August 6, 2012 ................ 51 Figure 11: ....... DO and temperature at RMPs on the Red Cedar River, August 14, 2012 .............. 51 Figure 12: ....... Trend DO and temperature data for 2001, 2010, and 2012 .................................... 52 Figure 13: ....... Trend grab sampling data in the Grand River ......................................................... 52 Figure 14: ....... Webster Road 24-hour continuous sonde data for the 2012 GRRC study .............. 53 Figure 15: ....... River Point Park 24-hour continuous sonde data for the 2012 GRRC study ........... 53 Figure 16: ....... NPDES permits in the GRRC TMDL watershed ...................................................... 54 Figure 17: ....... CSOs in the GRRC TMDL watershed ..................................................................... 54 Figure 18: ....... CAFO permits in the GRRC TMDL watershed ........................................................ 55 Figure 19: ....... Sewered versus unsewered in the GRRC TMDL watershed .................................. 55 Figure 20: ....... Percent impervious soils in the GRRC TMDL watershed ........................................ 56 Figure 21: ....... Biosolids in the GRRC TMDL watershed ................................................................ 57 iii ACRONYMS AUID Assessment Unit Identification AWT Advanced Waste Treatment BMP Best Management Practices BOD Biochemical Oxygen Demand BWL Board of Water and Light CAFO Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation CBOD Carbonaceous Biological Oxygen Demand CFR Code of Federal Regulations cfs Cubic Feet Per Second CNMP Comprehensive Nutrient Management Plan COC Certificate of Coverage CSO Combined Sewer Overflows DMR Discharge Monitoring Report DO Dissolved Oxygen GRRC Grand River/Red Cedar IDEP Illicit Discharge Elimination Program LA Load Allocation LC Loading Capacity LLWFA Landscape Level Wetland Functional Assessment L-THIA Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment MDEQ Michigan Department of Environmental Quality MDOT Michigan Department of Transportation mg/l Milligrams Per Liter MGD Million Gallons Per Day MHP Mobile Home Park MOS Margin of Safety
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 10026 S Ubje Ct to a P P Ro V
    DELHI CHARTER TOWNSHIP MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 8, 2018 Delhi Charter Township Board of Trustees met in a regular meeting on Wednesday, August 8, 2018 in the Multipurpose Room at the Community Services Center, 2074 Aurelius Road, Holt, Michigan. Supervisor Hayhoe called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Members Present: Supervisor John Hayhoe, Clerk Evan Hope, Treasurer Roy Sweet, Trustees Stuart Goodrich, Tom Lenard, DiAnne Warfield Members Absent: Trustee Pat Brown COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC – None SET/ADJUST AGENDA Hope moved, Goodrich supported, to add Late Agenda Item F under Consent Agenda – Holt Community Arts Council’s Request to Serve Alcohol in Veterans Memorial Gardens. A Voice Poll Vote was recorded as follows: All Ayes Absent: Brown MOTION CARRIED CONSENT AGENDA SUBJECT TO APPROVAL A. Approval of Minutes – Committee Meeting of July 17, 2018 B. Approval of Minutes – Regular Meeting of July 18, 2018 C. Approval of Claims – July 18, 2018 (ATTACHMENT I) D. Approval of Claims – July 31, 2018 (ATTACHMENT II) E. Approval of Payroll – July 26, 2018 (ATTACHMENT III) F. Holt Community Arts Council’s Request to Serve Alcohol in Veterans Memorial Gardens (ATTACHMENT IV) Warfield moved, Goodrich supported, to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. A Voice Poll was recorded as follows: Ayes: Warfield, Goodrich, Hayhoe, Hope, Lenard, Sweet Absent: Brown MOTION CARRIED 10026 DELHI CHARTER TOWNSHIP MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 8, 2018 NEW BUSINESS SPECIAL USE PERMIT NO. 18-286 – 1795 CEDAR STREET - FAIRYTALES DAYCARE – TAX PARCEL #33-25-05-23-251-022 – CHILD CARE CENTER The Board reviewed a memorandum dated July 31, 2018 from Tracy Miller, Director of Community Development (ATTACHMENT V).
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives on Retail and Consumer Goods
    Perspectives on retail and consumer goods Number 4, Autumn 2015 Perspectives on retail and Editor McKinsey Practice consumer goods is written by Monica Toriello Publications experts and practitioners in McKinsey & Company’s Retail Contributing Editor Editor-in-Chief and Consumer Packaged Caitlin Gallagher Lucia Rahilly Goods practices, along with other McKinsey colleagues. Art Direction and Design Executive Editors Hil Albuquerque, Nicole Michael T. Borruso, Allan Gold, To send comments or request Esquerre Bill Javetski, Mark Staples copies, e-mail us: Consumer_ [email protected] Editorial Production Copyright © 2015 McKinsey & Runa Arora, Elizabeth Company. All rights reserved. Editorial Board Brown, Heather Byer, Klaus Behrenbeck, Peter Torea Frey, Heather Gross, This publication is not intended Breuer, Peter Child, Sandrine Katya Petriwsky, John C. to be used as the basis for Devillard, Dennis Martinis, Sanchez, Dana Sand, trading in the shares of any Jørgen Rugholm, Frank Sneha Vats company or for undertaking Sänger, Tobias Wachinger, any other complex or significant Anja Weissgerber Managing Editors financial transaction without Michael T. Borruso, Venetia consulting appropriate Senior Content Manager Simcock professional advisers. Tobias Wachinger Cover Illustration No part of this publication may Project and Content Keiko Morimoto be copied or redistributed Manager in any form without the prior Anja Weissgerber written consent of McKinsey & Company. Table of contents 4 12 16 28 Modern grocery and Amazon China’s president Winning in Africa’s Becoming a regional the emerging-market on ‘transformative’ consumer market powerhouse in food consumer: A complicated technologies For consumer-goods retailing courtship Doug Gurr reflects on how companies, Africa holds Croatian conglomerate In some emerging markets, China differs from Western much promise—but also Agrokor is the top grocery the response to modern markets and what role data many pitfalls.
    [Show full text]
  • Lapeer County Hazard Mitigation Plan (Draft)
    Hazard Mitigation Plan Lapeer County, MI Draft This document was prepared by the GLS Region V Planning and Development Commission staff in collaboration with the Lapeer County Office of Emergency Management. Table of Contents Introduction 12. Civil Disturbances……………………………...114 Communities Represented by the Lapeer County 13. Oil or Natural Gas Well/Pipeline Hazard Mitigation Plan………………………………..4 Accidents…………………………………………..115 Plan Development and Oversight……………………………4 14. Drought…………………………………………….118 Plan Development Work Items and Meetings………...5 14. Terrorism…………………………………………..120 15. Nuclear Attack…………………………………..122 Lapeer County Community Profile 16. Scrap Tire Fires………………………………….124 Historical Perspective……………………………………………..6 17. Subsidence (Sinkholes)……………………..128 Regional Setting……………………………………………………...7 18. Earthquakes………………………………………130 Government…………………………………………………………...9 19. Nuclear Power Plant Accidents………….132 Transportation………………………………………………………..9 Climate…………………………………………………………………...9 Action Plan and Plan Maintenance Soils/Topography………………………………………………….10 Action Plan………………………………………………………….134 Population and Housing………………………………………..11 Plan Maintenance……………………………………………….147 Economy……………………………………………………………….11 Incorporating Recommendations into Community Land Use Characteristics & Changes in Local Land Plans……………………………………………………….147 Development…………………………………………….14 Community Facilities…………………………………………….14 Appendices Community Profiles………………………………………………25 Appendix A - Meeting Information Appendix B - Surveys Lapeer County Hazard Summary
    [Show full text]
  • List of Handlers December 2008 Mideast Marketing Area Federal Order 33
    LIST OF HANDLERS DECEMBER 2008 MIDEAST MARKETING AREA FEDERAL ORDER 33 Location Class I Differential Pool Distributing Plants Arps Dairy, Inc. Defiance, OH $1.80 Bareman Dairy, Inc. Holland, MI 1.80 Broughton Foods, LLC Marietta, OH 2.00 Calder Brother’s Dairy, Inc. Lincoln Park, MI 1.80 Carl Colteryahn Dairy, Inc. Pittsburgh, PA 2.10 Country Fresh - Flint Div. Flint, MI 1.80 Country Fresh - Grand Rapids Div. Grand Rapids, MI 1.80 Country Fresh - Jilbert Dairy, Inc. Marquette, MI 1.80 Country Fresh - Livonia Div. Livonia, MI 1.80 Dean Dairy Products Company Sharpsville, PA 2.10 Dean Foods Co. of Indiana, Inc. Rochester, IN 1.80 East Side Jersey Dairy, Inc. Anderson, IN 2.00 Fair Oaks Dairy Products, LLC Fair Oaks, IN 1.80 Farmland Dairies, LLC Grand Rapids, MI 1.80 Guernsey Farms Dairy Northville, MI 1.80 H. Meyer Dairy, LLC Cincinnati, OH 2.20 The Kroger Company Indianapolis, IN 2.00 Liberty Dairy Co. Evart, MI 1.80 Louis Trauth Dairy, LLC Newport, KY 2.20 Marburger Farm Dairy, Inc. Evans City, PA 2.10 Meadow Brook Dairy Co. Erie, PA 2.10 Michigan Dairy, LLC Livonia, MI 1.80 Nestle USA, Inc. Anderson, IN 2.00 Oberlin Farms Dairy, LLC Cleveland, OH 2.00 Pleasant View Dairy Corp. Highland, IN 1.80 Prairie Farms Dairy, Inc. Battle Creek, MI 1.80 Prairie Farms Dairy, Inc. Fort Wayne, IN 1.80 Quality Dairy Company Lansing, MI 1.80 Reiter Springfield, LLC Springfield, OH 2.00 Schneider’s Dairy, Inc. Pittsburgh, PA 2.10 Smith Dairy Products Company Orrville, OH 2.00 Smith Dairy / Wayne Division, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Chester Cadieux Co-Founder of Quiktrip
    Chester Cadieux Co-Founder of QuikTrip Introduction — 0:57 John Erling: Chester Cadieux was born and raised in Tulsa, Oklahoma. After graduating from Tulsa Central High School Chester earned a degree in Business Administration from The University of Oklahoma and then joined the Air Force. Three years later, Cadieux followed his business dream and co-founded QuikTrip, with fellow Tulsan Burt B. Holmes. And for the next 44 years Chester guided QuikTrip as President and CEO as the company successfully expanded into many states. In this interview recorded in QuikTrip’s executive offices in Tulsa, Oklahoma, you will learn what Chester did with $5,000. How by trial and error he found his way in the convenience store business. And while today QuikTrip is a major convenience store chain, it had its very humble beginnings. Listen now as Chester Cadieux takes you back to the early days on VoicesofOklahoma.com Chapter 2 — 5:13 Cadieux French Canadian John Erling: Today is July 31, 2009, and my name is John Erling. Chester Cadieux: My name is Chester Cadieux. I am 77 years old. I was born in Tulsa, Oklahoma. I have lived here almost all of my life. JE: And your date of birth? CC: 2/24/32 JE: Okay and you were born probably at which hospital in Tulsa? CC: Saint John’s JE: Where are we recording this? CC: Well, we’re recording this in the QuikTrip Corporate Office. JE: Okay, here in Tulsa, Oklahoma. CC: Right here in Tulsa, that’s right. CHESTEr CADIEUX 2 JE: Your parents’ names and who they– CC: My Father’s name was the same as mine, Chester Edward Cadieux.
    [Show full text]
  • FOOT TRAFFIC REPORT for the Fuel & Convenience Retailing Industry
    FOOT TRAFFIC REPORT for the fuel & convenience retailing industry Q1 2018 FOOT TRAFFIC REPORT Q1 2018 GasBuddy and Cuebiq examined more than 32.6 million consumer visits to fuel and convenience retailers between January 1 and March 31, 2018. This data provides actionable insights into consumer behavior and the factors that influence foot traffic. HIGHLIGHTS: New Rankings System This report now separates fuel and convenience brands into four categories based on the number of locations. Brands who received the most foot traffic per station in their respective categories include Ohio-based Speedway (1000+ locations), Washington-based Costco (250 – 999 locations), Kentucky-based Thorntons (50 – 249 locations) and Indiana-based Ricker’s (30 – 49 locations). Better Offerings, Better for Business In the 1000+ location category, four of the top five are convenience brands that emphasize in-store offerings. Speedway captured the top spot in this category following improvements in their fresh food service and putting a bigger emphasis on their loyalty program. Cumberland Farms #1 in Most States Cumberland Farms captures the highest average footfall traffic in six states, all of New England, despite falling short of the Top 10 overall within its category of 250 to 999 locations. Wawa comes in second with five states, including hotly-contested Pennsylvania. Costco and Kroger tie for third place with four states, and Speedway and Pilot tie for fifth place with three each. Hump Day is the Busiest Pump Day Wednesday at 5 p.m. was the busiest time time for fuel and convenience brands, followed by Friday from 4-6 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Individual Self-Insured Employer List
    Workers' Disability Compensation Agency Self-Insured Programs Individual Self-Insured Employer List A B F Freight System, Inc. Alro Steel Corporation Ms. Lynette Woodie Mr. Jim Norman 3801 Old Greenwood Road 3100 E. High Street P.O. Box 10048 P.O. Box 927 Fort Smith, AR 72917-0048 Jackson, MI 49204-0927 Self-Insured Carrier ID: 42090248 Self-Insured Carrier ID: 33047766 Self-Administered Parker Services, LLC Alticor Inc. A J M Packaging Corporation Ms. Judy Chavis Mr. Terry Jackson 7575 Fulton Street East Suite 100 Mail Code: 56-3T E-4111 Andover Road Ada, MI 49355-0001 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 Self-Insured Carrier ID: 59090441 Self-Insured Carrier ID: 26022282 Self-Administered Constitution State Services LLC A. D. Transport Express, Inc. American Electric Power Company, Inc. Mr. Gary A Percy Mr. Loyd Hudson 5601 Belleville Road 1 Riverside Plaza Canton, MI 48188 15th Floor IDM Center Self-Insured Carrier ID: 42091119 Columbus, OH 43215-2355 CompOne Administrators, Inc. Self-Insured Carrier ID: 49092102 Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc. ABM Industries Incorporated American National Red Cross Mr. Chris Ridge Mr. Mark Sherman 4151 Ashford Dunwoody Road 431 18th St. NW Suite 600 Washington, DC 20006 Atlanta, GA 30319 Self-Insured Carrier ID: 80001585 Self-Insured Carrier ID: 30057710 Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. ESIS, Inc. Andersons, Inc. (The) ADAC Plastics, Inc. Ms. Jan LaPlant Mr. Lucas McCotter P.O. Box 119 5690 Eagle Dr. 1947 Briarfield Blvd. Grand Rapids, MI 49512 Maumee, OH 43537 Self-Insured Carrier ID: 30043041 Self-Insured Carrier ID: 07032385 Eagle Claims Management, LLC ESIS, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Returnable Fee Ledger
    Michigan Department Of Licensing And Regulatory Affairs RETURNABLE FEE LEDGER Run By: BCZAIK Run On: September 11, 2015 06:57 AM District LANSING LGU % Begin Date 01-APR-15 End Date 30-JUN-15 Report: LLRE_REP_RETUR September 11, 2015 06:57 AM Michigan Department Of Licensing And Regulatory Affairs RETURNABLE FEE LEDGER District Name : LANSING LGU : L-1 BAINBRIDGE TWP PD TO CNTY 11 Business ID Licensee Name and Address License Type License Number Fee 132895 HAUCH, SHELLY SDM 11-75653-2015 100.00 5701 E NAPIER BENTON HARBOR, MI 49022 SDD 10-106320-2015 234.00 140223 QUALITY MARATHON, L.L.C. SDM 11-108590-2015 100.00 8151 E NAPIER BENTON HARBOR, MI 49022 159437 SECB, INC. CLASSC 01-137515-2015 100.00 5265 NAPIER CIR BENTON HARBOR, MI 49022 SDM 11-137516-2015 600.00 215962 J & T OPERATIONS, INC. CLASSC 01-183371-2015 100.00 R 2 195 S M 140 SDM 11-183372-2015 600.00 Total Fees Received for LGU $1,834.00 Rate of Refund 55.0% Total Returnable Fees for LGU $1,008.70 Report: LLRE_REP_RETURN_FEE2 September 11, 2015 06:57 AM Page 1 Michigan Department Of Licensing And Regulatory Affairs RETURNABLE FEE LEDGER District Name : LANSING LGU : L-2 BARODA TWP Business ID Licensee Name and Address License Type License Number Fee 190152 SILVERSPOON II, LLC CLASSC 01-162948-2015 100.00 9218 CLEVELAND BARODA, MI 49101 SDM 11-162949-2015 600.00 216383 BARODA PHILLIPS 66, INC. SDD 10-182643-2015 100.00 7773 STEVENSVILLE BARODA BARODA, MI 49101 SDM 11-182644-2015 468.00 240165 VILLAGE OF BARODA 24 HR 24-252466- 9091 FIRST BARODA, MI 49101 Total Fees Received for LGU $1,268.00 Rate of Refund 55.0% Total Returnable Fees for LGU $697.40 Report: LLRE_REP_RETURN_FEE2 September 11, 2015 06:57 AM Page 2 Michigan Department Of Licensing And Regulatory Affairs RETURNABLE FEE LEDGER District Name : LANSING LGU : L-3 BENTON TWP Business ID Licensee Name and Address License Type License Number Fee 5930 BOARD OF TRUSTEES LAKE MICHIGAN COLLEGE CLASSC 01-9095-2015 3050.00 2755 E NAPIER MENDEL CTR FOR ARTS & TECHNOLOGY 6029 CHIEF'S BAR, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • 1St Quarter 2016-17 (Lansing)
    Michigan Department Of Licensing And Regulatory Affairs RETURNABLE FEE LEDGER District Name : LANSING LGU : L-1 BAINBRIDGE TWP PD TO CNTY 11 Business ID Licensee Name and Address License Type License Number Fee 132895 HAUCH, SHELLY SDM 11-75653-2016 100.00 5701 E Napier Ave Benton Harbor, MI 49022-9613 SDD 10-106320-2016 252.00 140223 QUALITY MARATHON, L.L.C. SDM 11-108590-2016 100.00 8151 E Napier Ave Benton Harbor, MI 49022-9481 159437 SECB, INC. CLASSC 01-137515-2016 100.00 5265 Napier Cir Benton Harbor, MI 49022-8618 SDM 11-137516-2016 600.00 215962 J & T OPERATIONS, INC. CLASSC 01-183371-2016 100.00 R 2 195 S M 140 SDM 11-183372-2016 600.00 Total Fees Received for LGU $1,852.00 Rate of Refund 55.0% Total Returnable Fees for LGU $1,018.60 Report: LLRE_REP_RETURN_FEE2 September 01, 2016 12:35 PM Page 1 Michigan Department Of Licensing And Regulatory Affairs RETURNABLE FEE LEDGER District Name : LANSING LGU : L-2 BARODA TWP Business ID Licensee Name and Address License Type License Number Fee 190152 SILVERSPOON II, LLC CLASSC 01-162948-2016 100.00 9218 Cleveland Ave Baroda, MI 49101-9735 SDM 11-162949-2016 600.00 216383 BARODA PHILLIPS 66, INC. SDD 10-182643-2016 100.00 7773 Stevensville Baroda Rd Baroda, MI 49101-9723 SDM 11-182644-2016 450.00 240165 VILLAGE OF BARODA 24 HR 24-252466- 9091 First St Baroda, MI 49101-8924 24 HR 24-265226- Total Fees Received for LGU $1,250.00 Rate of Refund 55.0% Total Returnable Fees for LGU $687.50 Report: LLRE_REP_RETURN_FEE2 September 01, 2016 12:35 PM Page 2 Michigan Department Of Licensing And Regulatory Affairs RETURNABLE FEE LEDGER District Name : LANSING LGU : L-3 BENTON TWP Business ID Licensee Name and Address License Type License Number Fee 5930 BOARD OF TRUSTEES LAKE MICHIGAN COLLEGE CLASSC 01-9095-2016 3050.00 2755 E Napier Ave Benton Harbor, MI 49022-1881 6029 CHIEF'S BAR, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Annual Report 2017
    2017 ANNUAL REPORT CASEY’S GENERAL STORES, ANNUAL INC. 2017 REPORT DEVELOPING OUR FUTURE TABLE OF CONTENTS 2017 $269.7 $4.54 2016 $348.7 $5.79 2015 $282.0 $4.66 EARNINGS BEFORE BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE INCOME TAX (IN MILLIONS) {1} Message to our Shareholders ❱ 3 Management Team ❱ 5 Store Operations ❱ 7 Store Growth ❱ 13 Finance ❱ 15 Board of Directors ❱ 17 Investor Information ❱ 18 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 2016 2017 % CHANGE Total Revenue (in Thousands) ❱ $7,122,086 $7,506,587 5.4% Cash Flow from Operations (in Thousands) ❱ $472,386 $459,273 -2.8% Net Income (in Thousands) ❱ $225,982 $177,485 -21.5% EPS (Basic) ❱ $5.79 $4.54 -21.6% EPS (Diluted) ❱ $5.73 $4.48 -21.8% Employees ❱ 34,997 35,014 0.0% Number of Stores ❱ 1,931 1,978 2.4% TERRY W. HANDLEY - PRESIDENT & CEO {3} Message to our Shareholders Fiscal 2017 proved to be difficult not center expanding our geographic As a further commitment to creating only for Casey’s, but for the broader footprint, we have added more shareholder value, the Board of convenience, grocery, and food service resources to the store development Directors approved a share repurchase industries. The weak agricultural area in order to sustain a higher program in fiscal 2017 under which economy, which slowed the growth in rate of store growth than the recent the Company is authorized to customer traffic to stores, combined past. As a result of these efforts, repurchase up to an aggregate of with less volatility in wholesale fuel the Company had 27 new stores $300 million of our outstanding costs from prior year and wage rate under construction, 116 sites under common stock.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 1 Letter from the President
    2012 www.lansingchamber.org 1 LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT Dear Chamber Members, Welcome to the Lansing Regional The Lansing Regional Chamber of Commerce and our seven Chamber Chamber of Commerce 2012 partners from Charlotte, Clinton County, DeWitt, Eaton Rapids, Community Guide & Membership Grand Ledge, Mason and Williamston encourage you to explore the Directory. I am confident you numerous benefits of Chamber membership that are detailed in this will find this year’s Directory to publication. Your Chamber of Commerce is working hard to provide be a valuable tool filled with rich services and programs that will help you grow your business. resources that will assist you and your organization in many ways. On behalf of my colleagues at the Lansing Regional Chamber of Commerce and our regional Chamber partners, I would like to The 2012 Community Guide is thank you for your membership investment in our organizations and designed to offer you important extend our best wishes for a highly successful 2012. information about our region including economic growth highlights, demographics, information about homes and housing, transportation, educational institutions, Sincerely, health care and an impressive description of our numerous cultural assets. The material contained in the Community Guide can be useful in compiling reports and presentations and for building awareness about our region with people outside Greater Lansing. Many of our members have told us over the years that the Tim Daman Membership Directory section of this publication is one of their most President/CEO important resources for making connections to other businesses and Lansing Regional Chamber of Commerce organizations in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Seeking Market Access for Iowa-Based, Value-Added Food
    RWG02-05A Investigation of Strategic Partnership Opportunities with Iowa Convenience Store Retailers: Seeking Market Access for Iowa -Based, Value-Added Food Products By John Norwood, Sue Futrell and Mary Holz-Clause November 1, 2005 Introduction Recent stories from the popular press have suggested that convenience stores may be an untapped opportunity for Iowa producers to market local products. The purpose of this study was to investigate the interest that Iowa-based convenience stores (C-stores) may have in purchasing locally grown or locally prepared foods. Independent Iowa producers appear to be well situated to tap this rapidly growing market segment. Iowa is home to a significant number of C-store operations which span from the single store operator, to mid-sized operations with 5 to 20 stores, to large multi-state enterprises with 100 or more stores across the Midwest. While convenience stores historically have relied on the sale of gasoline, tobacco and other convenience products to provide three quarters of their revenue, the industry reports new trends toward expanded food offerings as a way to improve both revenue generation and overall store profitability. Sales of food products in C-stores have been steadily increasing as a proportion of revenue over the past 10 years. In many small rural towns where population declines have led to the closing of local grocery stores, the convenience store has taken its place as both a source of basic sundries and as a community node. Meanwhile in some urban intercity neighborhoods, mainstream grocery stores have relocated to more lucrative locations leaving C-stores to supply both gas and convenience groceries.
    [Show full text]