DOCSLIB.ORG

Byssus Skipper — Wisconsinbutterflies.Org Page 1 of 7

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Byssus Skipper — Wisconsinbutterflies.Org Page 1 of 7 Byssus Skipper — wisconsinbutterflies.org Page 1 of 7 Wisconsin Butterflies z butterflies z tiger beetles z robber flies Search species Byssus Skipper Problema byssus This is a confusing species to identify. I have spent more time studying this species than any other species of insect. Part of the problem is that it is not as common, especially in Wisconsin and it has a subspecies in the southeastern part of the United States which is more common, has more written about it, is easier to identify, and is often pictured in books. The subspecies that we have here is more variable, especially the males, which are sometimes nearly unmarked from below. In the Field Guide to The Skipper Butterflies of Illinois (Bouseman, Sternburg, and Wiker, 2006), this species is said to be using more disturbed habitats including roadsides and restored prairie and is apparently more common than it used to be. Weekly sightings for Byssus Skipper Identifying characteristics Below, the male of this species is variable, but ranges from a very bright yellowish orange to a somewhat darker orange with a darker margin, occasionally an obvious lighter area in the middle of the hindwing, and a white fringe. The female from below is much darker, and often is nearly brown with a very obvious spot band in the hindwing with all the spots of nearly the same size and in a crescent. Above, the male is yellowish orange with black margins. The male has no stigma, but does have a black mark at the end of the cell. There usually is little darkening of the veins, and there are a few dark marks toward the body on the forewing. The female is nearly brown with a very distinct row of orange spots on the forewing. Similar species The female Delaware Skipper is very similar to the male Byssus Skipper. In fact, the first photo I took of http://wisconsinbutterflies.org/butterfly/species/147-byssus-skipper 6/5/2009 Byssus Skipper — wisconsinbutterflies.org Page 2 of 7 a male Byssus Skipper, I originally assumed was a Delaware Skipper female. It wasn’t until I had done some additional research about the Byssus Skipper, which I was attempting to photograph, that I noticed that it might not be a Delaware Skipper. After much research into the differences between the two, I did determine that my photos were of a Byssus male. Later I was questioned about this determination and I revisited my photos and research and asked the opinions of others more familiar with the Byssus than myself and have determined that the photo was indeed a Byssus Skipper male. The differences between the two from above are minimal. Looking at the photo on the bottom that compares the two from both above and from below, notice that the female Delaware has very darkened veins, a large dark mark near the body, and orange fringe, while the Byssus does not have darkened veins, it has few dark markings near the body, and has white fringe. These characteristics are somewhat variable, and not all specimens would have all three characteristics the same, thus it is important to try to see or photograph this skipper from below so that you can also use these characteristics to help in identification. In 2007 I was able to take photos of many Delaware females and the two males on this page. The amount of black near the body on the forewing above does appear to be diagnostic. All female Delaware Skippers have much more black compared to the Byssus Skipper and each one that I saw perching was easy to identify based upon that characteristic. The Delaware Skipper from below is very uniform in color with no markings and fringe that is orange and nearly the same color as the wings. The Byssus Skipper from below is much brighter, has obvious darkened margins, and has white fringe, which contrasts greatly with the wing color. The Byssus Skipper has been found only in the far southwestern part of Wisconsin so it is not likely to be an identification problem throughout most of Wisconsin, but it looks so much like the Delaware it may be that it has simply been overlooked. The female Byssus is also very similar to the female Black Dash. The markings and coloration from above are nearly the same on these species but the spot band below on the Black Dash has the two middle spots more elongated than the others, while the Byssus Skipper female has spots that are nearly the same size. The seventh and eighth photos on this page are of a fairly worn individual, but without a good photo showing clearly that the spots are all similar; it cannot be identified with certainty. This individual was clearly larger than a Black Dash and was found on the dry hillside, a more likely habitat for the Byssus Skipper that has since been found there. Habitat High quality prairie habitat, but may be found in restored prairie habitat or along roadsides where the larval host plant, big bluestem is found. Flight This species is single brooded and flies from late June through July. Abundance Uncommon in the southwestern part of the state. Early Byssus Skipper Sightings Date County Reported by Jun 23, 2007 Lafayette Todd Sima and Mike Reese Jun 24, 2007 Grant Mike Reese Jul 2, 2006 Lafayette Todd Sima, Mike Reese Jul 6, 2008 Lafayette Ann & Scott Swengel http://wisconsinbutterflies.org/butterfly/species/147-byssus-skipper 6/5/2009 Byssus Skipper — wisconsinbutterflies.org Page 3 of 7 Jul 6, 2008 Grant Ann & Scott Swengel Locations Skippers | Grass-Skippers Click to enlarge Male, Hardscrabble SNA, Lafayette Co., WI. July 2, 2006. http://wisconsinbutterflies.org/butterfly/species/147-byssus-skipper 6/5/2009 Byssus Skipper — wisconsinbutterflies.org Page 4 of 7 Click to enlarge Male, Hardscrabble SNA, Lafayette Co., WI. July 2, 2006. Same individual as above. Click to enlarge Male, Hardscrabble SNA, Lafayette Co., WI. June 23, 2007. Same individual as the photo above. http://wisconsinbutterflies.org/butterfly/species/147-byssus-skipper 6/5/2009 Byssus Skipper — wisconsinbutterflies.org Page 5 of 7 Click to enlarge Male. Dewey Heights Prairie SNA, Grant Co., WI. June 24, 2007. Click to enlarge Male, Hardscrabble SNA, Lafayette Co., WI. June 23, 2007. http://wisconsinbutterflies.org/butterfly/species/147-byssus-skipper 6/5/2009 Byssus Skipper — wisconsinbutterflies.org Page 6 of 7 Click to enlarge Male. Dewey Heights Prairie SNA, Grant Co., WI. June 24, 2007. Same individual as above. Click to enlarge Female, Hardscrabble Prairie SNA, Lafayette Co., WI, July 28, 2005. http://wisconsinbutterflies.org/butterfly/species/147-byssus-skipper 6/5/2009 Byssus Skipper — wisconsinbutterflies.org Page 7 of 7 Female, Hardscrabble Prairie SNA, Lafayette Co., WI, July 28, 2005. Click to enlarge This photo compares the Byssus Skipper male, left photos, with Delaware Skippers, a female top right and an unknown gender Delaware Skipper bottom right. The photos from below and the photo on the top right were all taken on July 2, 2006 on the same hillside at Hardscrabble State Natural Area in Lafayette County. Show lightbox © 2009 wisconsinbutterflies.org | contact | about http://wisconsinbutterflies.org/butterfly/species/147-byssus-skipper 6/5/2009.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Threatened & Endangered Species
    Threatened & Endangered Species Iowa Animal ID Guide September 2011 Amphibians Butterflies Fresh Water Mussels Mammals Birds Fish Land Snails Reptiles A special thanks to the Iowa Department of Natural Resources for providing content to this guide. Natural Resources Conservation Service Helping People Help the Land www.ia.nrcs.usda.gov USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. How to use the Threatened & Endangered Species Iowa Animal ID Guide: • Endangered species are fish, plant life, or wildlife in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant part of its range. • Threatened species likely become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant part of its range. • Orange color-coded species are Iowa’s endangered animal species. They are listed in alphabetical order by common name. • Blue color-coded species are Iowa’s threatened animal species. They are also listed in alphabetical order by common name. • The scientific name for each species is listed below the common name. • Maps on each page highlight the species range in Iowa. Counties filled with a lighter color are only federally protected, while those with a darker color are both state and federally protected. Categories for each species: Amphibians Fish Mammals Birds Fresh Water Mussels Butterflies Land Snails Reptiles Endangered Animal Species Barn owl Tyto alba Habitat Nests and roosts in dark, secluded places. Often found in old barns and abandoned buildings. Barn owls hunt in grassland habitats along field edges, fence rows, and wetland edges where pray is most available. Appropriate practices • Establish grassland to attract prey (200 acres adjacent to potential barn nesting sites can produce good results).
    [Show full text]
  • Pollinator Butterfly Habitat
    The ecology and conservation of grassland butterflies in the central U.S. Dr. Ray Moranz Moranz Biological Consulting 4514 North Davis Court Stillwater, Oklahoma 74075 Outline of the Presentation, Part I • Basic butterfly biology • Butterflies as pollinators • Rare butterflies of Kansas Outline of the Presentation, Part 2 • Effects of fire and grazing on grassland butterflies • Resources to learn more about butterflies • 15 common KS butterflies Life Cycle of a Painted Lady, Vanessa cardui Egg Larva Adult Chrysalis Some butterflies migrate The Monarch is the best-known migratory butterfly Knife River Indian Villages National Historic Site, North Dakota Fall migratory pathways of the Monarch The Painted Lady is another migrant Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico Other butterflies are non- migratory Such as this regal fritillary, seen in Anderson County, Kansas Implications of migratory status -migratory butterflies aren’t vulnerable to prescribed burns in winter and early spring (they haven’t arrived yet) -full-year resident butterflies ARE vulnerable to winter and spring fires -migratory butterflies may need lots of nectar sources on their flyway to fuel their flight Most butterfly caterpillars are host plant specialists Implications of host plant specialization • If you have the host plant, you probably have the butterfly • If you plant their host, the butterfly may follow • If you and your neighbors lack the host plants, you are unlikely to see the butterflies except during migration Butterflies as pollinators • Bees pollinate more plant
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves
    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of Iowa's Lepidoptera
    The Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science: JIAS Volume 105 | Number Article 9 1998 The tS atus of Iowa's Lepidoptera Dennis W. Schlicht Timothy T. Orwig Morningside College Copyright © Copyright 1998 by the Iowa Academy of Science, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uni.edu/jias Part of the Anthropology Commons, Life Sciences Commons, Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons, and the Science and Mathematics Education Commons Recommended Citation Schlicht, Dennis W. and Orwig, Timothy T. (1998) "The tS atus of Iowa's Lepidoptera," The Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science: JIAS: Vol. 105: No. 2 , Article 9. Available at: http://scholarworks.uni.edu/jias/vol105/iss2/9 This Research is brought to you for free and open access by UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in The ourJ nal of the Iowa Academy of Science: JIAS by an authorized editor of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Jour. Iowa Acad. Sci. 105(2):82-88, 1998 The Status of Iowa's Lepidoptera DENNIS W. SCHLICHT1 and TIMOTHY T. ORWIG2 1 Iowa Lepidoptera Project, 1108 First Avenue, Center Point, Iowa 52213. 2 Morningside College, Sioux City, Iowa 51106. Including strays, 122 species of butterflies have been confirmed in Iowa. However, since European settlement the populations of taxa of Iowa Lepidoptera have declined. While certain generalist species have experienced declines, species with life cycles that include native habitats, especially prairies and wetlands, have been particularly vulnerable. In a 1994 revision of the Iowa endangered and threatened species list, the Natural Resource Commission (NRC) listed two species of butterflies as endangered, five as threatened, and 25 as special concern, using general legal definitions of those rankings (NRC 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Tripsacum Dactyloides Scientific Name  Tripsacum Dactyloides (L.) L
    Tropical Forages Tripsacum dactyloides Scientific name Tripsacum dactyloides (L.) L. Subordinate taxa: Perennial clump grass, Texas, USA Tripsacum dactyloides (L.) L. var. dactyloides Tiller base with short, knotty rhizome and developing prop roots (ILRI 15488) Tripsacum dactyloides (L.) L. var. hispidum (Hitchc.) de Wet & J.R. Harlan Tripsacum dactyloides (L.) L. var. meridonale de Wet & Timothy Tripsacum dactyloides (L.) L. var. mexicanum de Wet & J.R. Harlan Synonyms Single raceme with white stigmas emerging from ♀ spikelets at base of var. dactyloides: basionym Coix dactyloides L.; raceme; purplish stems Tripsacum dactyloides (L.) L. var. occidentale H.C. Single racemes and subdigitate panicle; Cutler & E.S. Anderson anthers emerging from ♂ apical flowers, stigmas on ♀ basal flowers already var. hispidum (Hitchc.) de Wet & J.R. Harlan: senescent Basionym: Tripsacum dactyloides subsp. hispidum Hitchc. Family/tribe Family: Poaceae (alt. Gramineae) subfamily: Panicoideae tribe: Andropogoneae subtribe: Tripsacinae. Morphological description Seed unit with caryopsis Seed units An extremely variable perennial clump grass, with short, fibrous, knotty rhizomes and deep hollow roots. Culms 1‒2.5 (‒4 m) tall, and 3‒5 cm thick at base, branching, prop-rooting from lower nodes; stems purplish, glabrous. Leaf sheath glabrous, often purplish; leaf-blade lanceolate-acuminate, to 30‒75 (‒1.5) cm long and 9‒35 (‒45) mm wide, mostly glabrous, sometimes hairy at the base of the upper blade surface; prominent midrib; Seed production area, Knox margin scabrous; ligule a fringed membrane, 1‒1.5 mm County, Texas, USA (PI 434493) long. Inflorescence 10‒20 (‒30) cm long, terminal and axillary, commonly a single raceme, or subdigitate panicle comprising 2‒3 (‒6) racemes of usually A.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies of Citrus County and Host Plants
    Butterflies of Citrus County ~---4- --•;... ____ - Family I Species Host plant Hesperiidae SkipQers Phocides Qigmalion Mangrove Skipper ~mangrove herbs, vines, shrubs, and trees in the pea family (Fabaceae) including false indigobush (Amorpha fruticosa L.), American hogpeanut (Amphicarpaea bracteata [L.) Fernald), Atlantic pidgeonwings or butterfly pea (Clitoria mariana L.), groundnut (Apios ~vreus clarus Silver-spotted Skip~ americana Medik.), American wisteria (Wisteria frutescens [L.) Poir.) and the introduced Dixie ticktrefoil (Desmodium tortuosum [Sw.] DC.), kudzu (Pueraria montana [Lour.] Merr.), black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.), Chinese wisteria (Wisteria sinensis [Sims) DC.) and a variety of other legumes Urbanus prqJg_µs Long-t~.Ued SkiQpec vine legumes including various beans (Phaseolus), hog peanuts (Amphicarpa bracteata), beggar's ticks (Desmodium), blue peas (Clitoria), and wisteria (Wisteria) Various legumes inclu ding wild and cu ltivated beans (Phaseolus), begga r's ticks Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail (Desmodium), and bl ue peas (Clit oria ) -· Beggar\'s ticks (Desmodium); occasionally false indigo (Baptisia) and bush clover Achalarus ly-ciades Hoar.y_r;_ggg {Lespedeza); all in the pea family {Fabaceae) - pea family (Fabaceae) including beggar's ticks (Desmodium), bush clover (Lespedeza), Thor'lbes P'llades Northern Cloud'lwing clover (Trifolium), lotus (Hosackia), and others. -----· Thory-bes bathy-llus Southern Cloudywing Potato bean, Apios americana. Ozark milkvetch, Astragalus distortus var. engelmanni ~ ---- Lespedezas (Lespedeza spp .) are reported as well as Florida Hoarypea (Tephrosia l ibQr:_y_bes confusis Confused Cloudy-wing florid a) . -· -- -------- Staphy:lus hayhurst_ii Ha yh u r?J?-5.IAJ.\QQ Wi ri_g Lambsquart ers {Che nopodium) in the goosefoot family (Chenopodiaceae ), and occasiona lly chaff flower (Alternanthera) in the pigweed family (Amaranthaceae).
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation of the Arogos Skipper, Atrytone Arogos Arogos (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) in Florida Marc C
    Conservation of the Arogos Skipper, Atrytone arogos arogos (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) in Florida Marc C. Minno St. Johns River Water Management District P.O. Box 1429, Palatka, FL 32177 [email protected] Maria Minno Eco-Cognizant, Inc., 600 NW 35th Terrace, Gainesville, FL 32607 [email protected] ABSTRACT The Arogos skipper is a rare and declining butterfly found in native grassland habitats in the eastern and mid- western United States. Five distinct populations of the butterfly occur in specific parts of the range. Atrytone arogos arogos once occurred from southern South Carolina through eastern Georgia and peninsular Florida as far south as Miami. This butterfly is currently thought to be extirpated from South Carolina and Georgia. The six known sites in Florida for A. arogos arogos are public lands with dry prairie or longleaf pine savanna having an abundance of the larval host grass, Sorghastrum secundum. Colonies of the butterfly are threat- ened by catastrophic events such as wild fires, land management activities or no management, and the loss of genetic integrity. The dry prairie preserves of central Florida will be especially important to the recovery of the butterfly, since these are some of the largest and last remaining grasslands in the state. It may be possible to create new colonies of the Arogos skipper by releasing wild-caught females or captive-bred individuals into currently unoccupied areas of high quality habitat. INTRODUCTION tered colonies were found in New Jersey, North Carolina, South Carolina, Florida, and Mississippi. The three re- gions where the butterfly was most abundant included The Arogos skipper (Atrytone arogos) is a very locally the New Jersey pine barrens, peninsular Florida, and distributed butterfly that occurs only in the eastern and southeastern Mississippi.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a New Conservation Vision for the Great Lakes Region: a Second Iteration
    Toward a New Conservation Vision for the Great Lakes Region: A Second Iteration (Revised September 2000) Prepared by The Nature Conservancy Great Lakes Program 8 South Michigan Avenue Suite 2301 Chicago, IL 60603 (312) 759-8017 Copyright 2000 Toward a New Conservation Vision for the Great Lakes Toward A New Conservation Vision for the Great Lakes In 1996, The Nature Conservancy’s Great Lakes Program launched a collaborative initiative to identify high priority biodiversity conservation sites in the Great Lakes region. This initiative was precipitated by the Conservancy broadening its focus beyond just rare and endangered species and natural communities. The Conservancy recognized that to effectively protect the full range of biodiversity, conservation efforts must include those species and natural communities that are more common and representative as well as those that are declining or vulnerable. Taking an Ecoregional Perspective To address this shift in focus, the Conservancy oriented its work based on ecoregions—large areas defined by the influences of shared climate and geology, the main factors that determine the broad-scale distribution of plants and animals.1 The Great Lakes ecoregion—which includes major portions of Canada and the United States—is one of 64 ecologically distinct regions of the continental United States. For each of these ecoregions, the Conservancy is developing a detailed plan that identifies the places that need to be protected to conserve native biodiversity for the long term. At many of these places, local communities, private landowners and an array of public and private entities are already leading important conservation efforts. The Great Lakes ecoregional planning initiative is a systematic approach that identifies all native species, natural communities and aquatic systems characteristic of the Great Lakes region and then determines how many of and where these elements of biodiversity need to be protected over the long term.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Butterflies & Host Plants
    GIANT SKIPPERS Family: Hesperiidae, Subfamily: Megathymi- nae Yucca Giant-Skipper: Megathymus yuccae Host: Yuccas (Yucca aloifolia, Y. gloriosa, Y. fila- mentosa, Y. flaccida) Carolina Satyr S. Pearly-eye Gemmed Satry Viola’s Wood-Satyr Horace’s Duskywing by Gosse Silver-spotted Skipper nectaring on pickerlweed Butterflies need native host plants to complete SATYRS their life cycle. The larvae of many species can Family: Nymphalidae, Subfamily: Satyrinae only survive on specific plants; think of mon- Southern Pearly-eye: Enodia portlandia * archs and milkweeds, longwings and passion- Host: Switchcane (Arundinaria tecta) flowers. The host plants listed here are native to the coastal region of Georgia & South Caro- Creole Pearly Eye: Enodia creola Delaware Skipper Long-tailed Skipper Host: Switchcane (Arundinaria tecta) lina. They provide a critical link for butterfly survival. Protect native plants in your landscape Appalachian Brown: Satyrodes appalachia and grow them in your gardens to support Host: Carex spp., Rhynchospora spp. these important pollinators. Gemmed Satyr: Cyllopsis gemma * Host: Woodoats (Chasmanthium laxum, C. ses- siliflorum) Sachem Skipper Whirlabout Skipper Carolina Satyr: Hermeuptychia sosybius * Host: St. Augustine (Stenotaphrum secundatum) Georgia Satyr: Neonympha areolata Host: Sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense), Sedges (Cyperaceae) Fiery Skipper Checkered Skipper Provided by Coastal WildScapes Little Wood Satyr: Megisto cymela * Twin-spotted Skipper Lace-winged Roadside (www.coastalwildscapes.org) Host: St. Augustine
    [Show full text]
  • ITC Iowa Environmental Overview: Rare Species and Habitats Linn County, IA June 8Th, 2016 SCHEDULE
    ITC IOWA ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW: RARE SPecies AND HABITAts Linn County, IA June 8th, 2016 SCHEDULE MEETING PLACE: Days Inn and Suites of Cedar Rapids (Depart at 7:00 am) • 2215 Blairs Ferry Rd NE, Cedar Rapids, IA 52402 STOP 1: Highway 100 Extension Project and Rock Island Botanical Preserve (7:15 am-10:45 am) • Ecosystems: Emergent Wetland, Dry Sand Prairie, Sand Oak Savanna, River Floodplain Forest • T&E Species : Northern long-eared bat, Prairie vole, Western harvest mouse, Southern flying squirrel, Blanding’s turtle, Bullsnake, Ornate box turtle, Blue racer, Byssus skipper, Zabulon skipper, Wild Indigo duskywing, Acadian hairstreak, Woodland horsetail, Prairie moonwort, Northern Adder’s-tongue, Soft rush, Northern panic-grass, Great Plains Ladies’-tresses, Glomerate sedge, Goats-rue, Field sedge, Flat top white aster • Invasive Species: Garlic mustard, Common buckthorn, Eurasian honeysuckles, Autumn-olive, Yellow & White sweet-clover, Common mullein, Bouncing bet, Kentucky bluegrass, Siberian elm, Japanese barberry, White mulberry, Smooth brome LUNCH: BurgerFeen (11:00 am – 12:00 pm) • 3980 Center Point Rd NE, Cedar Rapids, IA 52402 STOP 2: McLoud Run (12:15 pm – 2:45 pm) • Current Ecosystems: Disturbed Floodplain Forest • T&E Species: none • Invasive Species: Black locust, Bird’s-foot trefoil, Bouncing bet, Crown vetch, Cut-leaved teasel, Eurasian Honeysuckles, Garlic mustard, Japanese knotweed, Reed canary grass, Siberian elm, Tree-of-heaven, White mulberry, Wild parsnip RETURN TO HOTEL (3:00 pm) Martha Holzheuer, LLA, CE, CA Matt
    [Show full text]
  • A Biological Survey of the Linda's Roadside Skipper Butterfly
    FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORT Federal Aid Grant No. F14AF01227 (T-82-1) A Biological Survey of the Linda’s Roadside Skipper Butterfly (Amblyscirtes linda) Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation Grant Period: April 1, 2015 – March 31, 2020 FINAL PERFOMANCE REPORT State: Oklahoma Grant Number: F14AF01227 (T-82-1) Grant Program: State Wildlife Grants Program Grant Name: A Biological Survey of the Linda’s Roadside Skipper Butterfly (Amblyscirtes linda) Reporting Period: April 1, 2015 – March 31, 2020 Grant Period: April 1, 2015 – March 31, 2020 Principal Investigator: Dr. Katrina Menard, Assistant Staff Curator of Recent Invertebrates, Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History, University of Oklahoma. ABSTRACT: We conducted field surveys in seven counties in eastern Oklahoma to document Linda’s Roadside Skippers (Amblyscirtes linda). We obtained 196 adult Hesperiidae butterflies of which at least 37 are Amblyscirtes linda or its sister taxon A. belli. Each specimen that we collected was properly prepared, labeled and accessioned into the Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History’s Recent Invertebrates Collection. Many of these specimens represented species placed in our collection for the first time including the first curated specimens of A. linda collected from Oklahoma. We collected DNA vouchers from each of the butterfly species that we collected and successfully extracted DNA from these specimens, amplified it using Polymerase Chain Reaction, sequenced the CO1 gene, and uploaded the genetic information into the Barcode of Life Database. Each butterfly specimen was imaged to coordinate with its DNA barcode records. Genitalia also were imaged to aid in species identification and verification. We obtained samples of the presumed larval host plant, Indian Woodoat (Chasmanthium latifolium), from most sites where we collected butterflies and deposited these into the OU Herbarium for future study.
    [Show full text]
  • A SKELETON CHECKLIST of the BUTTERFLIES of the UNITED STATES and CANADA Preparatory to Publication of the Catalogue Jonathan P
    A SKELETON CHECKLIST OF THE BUTTERFLIES OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA Preparatory to publication of the Catalogue © Jonathan P. Pelham August 2006 Superfamily HESPERIOIDEA Latreille, 1809 Family Hesperiidae Latreille, 1809 Subfamily Eudaminae Mabille, 1877 PHOCIDES Hübner, [1819] = Erycides Hübner, [1819] = Dysenius Scudder, 1872 *1. Phocides pigmalion (Cramer, 1779) = tenuistriga Mabille & Boullet, 1912 a. Phocides pigmalion okeechobee (Worthington, 1881) 2. Phocides belus (Godman and Salvin, 1890) *3. Phocides polybius (Fabricius, 1793) =‡palemon (Cramer, 1777) Homonym = cruentus Hübner, [1819] = palaemonides Röber, 1925 = ab. ‡"gunderi" R. C. Williams & Bell, 1931 a. Phocides polybius lilea (Reakirt, [1867]) = albicilla (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) = socius (Butler & Druce, 1872) =‡cruentus (Scudder, 1872) Homonym = sanguinea (Scudder, 1872) = imbreus (Plötz, 1879) = spurius (Mabille, 1880) = decolor (Mabille, 1880) = albiciliata Röber, 1925 PROTEIDES Hübner, [1819] = Dicranaspis Mabille, [1879] 4. Proteides mercurius (Fabricius, 1787) a. Proteides mercurius mercurius (Fabricius, 1787) =‡idas (Cramer, 1779) Homonym b. Proteides mercurius sanantonio (Lucas, 1857) EPARGYREUS Hübner, [1819] = Eridamus Burmeister, 1875 5. Epargyreus zestos (Geyer, 1832) a. Epargyreus zestos zestos (Geyer, 1832) = oberon (Worthington, 1881) = arsaces Mabille, 1903 6. Epargyreus clarus (Cramer, 1775) a. Epargyreus clarus clarus (Cramer, 1775) =‡tityrus (Fabricius, 1775) Homonym = argentosus Hayward, 1933 = argenteola (Matsumura, 1940) = ab. ‡"obliteratus"
    [Show full text]