DOCSLIB.ORG

Host Plant Relationships Between Native Lepidoptera and Three Native Grasses Diane M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Host Plant Relationships Between Native Lepidoptera and Three Native Grasses Diane M Host Plant Relationships Between Native Lepidoptera and Three Native Grasses Diane M. Narem, Mary H. Meyer Department of Horticultural Science, University of Minnesota – Twin Cities Table 1. Little Bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium) Lepidoptera use native grasses for: Introduction COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME Oslar’s roadside skipper Amblyscirtes oslari Oviposition adults lay eggs directly on grasses Native grasses are host plants, providing food and shelter, for Arogos skipper Atrytone arogos numerous Lepidoptera species during their larval stage. However, dusted skipper Atrytonopsis hianna Shelter these benefits to Lepidoptera are not typically known to many common wood nymph Cercyonis pegala larvae build shelters using silk horticulturists, let alone the average consumer. We reviewed the Cosmopterigidae moth Cosmopterix callichalca larvae hide in the base of grasses literature to document specific associations between native Assiniboia skipper Hesperia assiniboia larvae overwinter as larvae in grasses Dakota skipper shelter by Diane Narem Lepidoptera species and native grasses. Dakota skipper Hesperia dacotae Leonard’s skipper Hesperia leonardus Food cobweb skipper Hesperia metea larvae feed from shelter Methods Ottoe skipper Hesperia ottoe larvae feed camouflaged in the open Indian skipper Hesperia sassacus larvae feed by leaf mining 15 swarthy skipper Nastra lherminier larvae feed by boring into stem or roots Three native prairie grasses, common in the horticulture trade: little Poweshiek skipperling Oarisma poweshiek larvae feed on seeds bluestem, [Schizachyrium scoparium (Michx.) Nash], blue grama, crossline skipper Polites origenes Dakota skipper larvae by MN Zoo (Bouteloua gracilis Willd. ex Kunth), and big bluestem (Andropogon Gelechiidae moth Stereomita andropogonis gerardii Vitman) were reviewed as host plants. Records which Ottoe skipper by Bryan Reynolds identified these grasses as host plants for native Lepidoptera Discussion species in the upper Midwest region (ND, SD, MN, IA, WI, MI, IL) Table 2. Blue Grama (Bouteloua gracilis) were included. COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME Oslar’s roadside skipper Amblyscirtes oslari Additional grass skipper species that feed on native grasses were found. Simius skipper Notamblyscirtes simius However, their host plants were listed only to genus, or were not listed in Results Mead’s wood nymph Cercyonis meadii the plant community reference that defined the scope of our study. Blake’s tiger moth Grammia blakei Further research on grass skippers and moths may reveal additional Assiniboia skipper Hesperia assiniboia Lepidoptera species that use these native grasses. Lepidoptera that use native common branded skipper Hesperia comma This information can assist horticulturalists, ecologists, landscape prairie graminoids: Leonard’s skipper Hesperia leonardus planners, land managers, and homeowners in their decisions to buy and plant native grass species. Ottoe skipper Hesperia ottoe Butterflies This knowledge provides increased awareness about the larval life stage Pahaska skipper Hesperia pahaska Family Hesperiidae, Subfamily of butterflies and moths to concerned citizens and green industry and Uncas skipper Hesperia uncas Hesperiinae 13 further supports the importance of conserving native prairie to maintain Dion skipper by Bryan Reynolds Hesperiinae larvae eat grasses and/or Ridings’ satyr Neominois ridingsii Lepidoptera. sedges. Garita skipperling Oarisma garita Most larvae build shelters, overwinter in Rhesus skipper Polites rhesus larvae stage. Uncas skipper by Bryan Reynolds Adults have short bodies, fly in bursts. Acknowledgements Family Nymphalidae, Subfamily Nicole Roth,; Kimberley Shropshire; Dr. Karen Oberhauser and Dr. Robert Satyrinae Table 3. Big Bluestem (Andropogon gerardii) Dana; James Scott, Ann Swengel, Scott Swengel, Eric Metzler, Ron Huber, Most Satyrinae larvae eat COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME Eric Quinter, Chris Schmidt, and John Brown and the Minnesota Department grasses/sedges. of Agriculture Specialty Crop Block Grant for funding this research. Ottoe skipper by Bryan Reynolds Oslar’s roadside skipper Amblyscirtes oslari Larvae are camouflaged. Delaware skipper Anatrytone logan Adults have “hopping” flight pattern, Arogos skipper Atrytone arogos mostly feed on sap. dusted skipper Atrytonopsis hianna References wheat head armyworm Faronta diffusa Moths Dakota skipper Hesperia dacotae Narem, D. M. and Meyer, M.H. 2017. Native Prairie Graminoid Host Plants of Species from multiple different families: cobweb skipper Hesperia metea Subfamily Arctiinae (tiger moths) Minnesota and Associated Lepidoptera: A Literature Review. Journal of the Ottoe skipper Hesperia ottoe Subfamily Cosmopteriginae (cosmet Lepidopterists’ Society. https://www.lepsoc.org. (In press). moths) Indian skipper Hesperia sassacus Subfamily Anomologinae 11 Newman’s borer Meropleon ambifusca Subfamily Noctuinae – contains Byssus skipper Problema byssus generalists Common wood nymph by Karl Foord Arogos skipper by Bryan Reynolds.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description
    Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description Prepared by: Michael A. Kost, Dennis A. Albert, Joshua G. Cohen, Bradford S. Slaughter, Rebecca K. Schillo, Christopher R. Weber, and Kim A. Chapman Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 13036 Lansing, MI 48901-3036 For: Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral and Fire Management Division September 30, 2007 Report Number 2007-21 Version 1.2 Last Updated: July 9, 2010 Suggested Citation: Kost, M.A., D.A. Albert, J.G. Cohen, B.S. Slaughter, R.K. Schillo, C.R. Weber, and K.A. Chapman. 2007. Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description. Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Report Number 2007-21, Lansing, MI. 314 pp. Copyright 2007 Michigan State University Board of Trustees. Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status or family status. Cover photos: Top left, Dry Sand Prairie at Indian Lake, Newaygo County (M. Kost); top right, Limestone Bedrock Lakeshore, Summer Island, Delta County (J. Cohen); lower left, Muskeg, Luce County (J. Cohen); and lower right, Mesic Northern Forest as a matrix natural community, Porcupine Mountains Wilderness State Park, Ontonagon County (M. Kost). Acknowledgements We thank the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral, and Fire Management Division for funding this effort to classify and describe the natural communities of Michigan. This work relied heavily on data collected by many present and former Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) field scientists and collaborators, including members of the Michigan Natural Areas Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollinator Butterfly Habitat
    The ecology and conservation of grassland butterflies in the central U.S. Dr. Ray Moranz Moranz Biological Consulting 4514 North Davis Court Stillwater, Oklahoma 74075 Outline of the Presentation, Part I • Basic butterfly biology • Butterflies as pollinators • Rare butterflies of Kansas Outline of the Presentation, Part 2 • Effects of fire and grazing on grassland butterflies • Resources to learn more about butterflies • 15 common KS butterflies Life Cycle of a Painted Lady, Vanessa cardui Egg Larva Adult Chrysalis Some butterflies migrate The Monarch is the best-known migratory butterfly Knife River Indian Villages National Historic Site, North Dakota Fall migratory pathways of the Monarch The Painted Lady is another migrant Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico Other butterflies are non- migratory Such as this regal fritillary, seen in Anderson County, Kansas Implications of migratory status -migratory butterflies aren’t vulnerable to prescribed burns in winter and early spring (they haven’t arrived yet) -full-year resident butterflies ARE vulnerable to winter and spring fires -migratory butterflies may need lots of nectar sources on their flyway to fuel their flight Most butterfly caterpillars are host plant specialists Implications of host plant specialization • If you have the host plant, you probably have the butterfly • If you plant their host, the butterfly may follow • If you and your neighbors lack the host plants, you are unlikely to see the butterflies except during migration Butterflies as pollinators • Bees pollinate more plant
    [Show full text]
  • Orange Sulphur, Colias Eurytheme, on Boneset
    Orange Sulphur, Colias eurytheme, on Boneset, Eupatorium perfoliatum, In OMC flitrh Insect Survey of Waukegan Dunes, Summer 2002 Including Butterflies, Dragonflies & Beetles Prepared for the Waukegan Harbor Citizens' Advisory Group Jean B . Schreiber (Susie), Chair Principal Investigator : John A. Wagner, Ph . D . Associate, Department of Zoology - Insects Field Museum of Natural History 1400 South Lake Shore Drive Chicago, Illinois 60605 Telephone (708) 485 7358 home (312) 665 7016 museum Email jwdw440(q-), m indsprinq .co m > home wagner@,fmnh .orq> museum Abstract: From May 10, 2002 through September 13, 2002, eight field trips were made to the Harbor at Waukegan, Illinois to survey the beach - dunes and swales for Odonata [dragonfly], Lepidoptera [butterfly] and Coleoptera [beetles] faunas between Midwest Generation Plant on the North and the Outboard Marine Corporation ditch at the South . Eight species of Dragonflies, fourteen species of Butterflies, and eighteen species of beetles are identified . No threatened or endangered species were found in this survey during twenty-four hours of field observations . The area is undoubtedly home to many more species than those listed in this report. Of note, the endangered Karner Blue butterfly, Lycaeides melissa samuelis Nabakov was not seen even though it has been reported from Illinois Beach State Park, Lake County . The larval food plant, Lupinus perennis, for the blue was not observed at Waukegan. The limestone seeps habitat of the endangered Hines Emerald dragonfly, Somatochlora hineana, is not part of the ecology here . One surprise is the. breeding population of Buckeye butterflies, Junonia coenid (Hubner) which may be feeding on Purple Loosestrife . The specimens collected in this study are deposited in the insect collection at the Field Museum .
    [Show full text]
  • Working List of Prairie Restricted (Specialist) Insects in Wisconsin (11/26/2015)
    Working List of Prairie Restricted (Specialist) Insects in Wisconsin (11/26/2015) By Richard Henderson Research Ecologist, WI DNR Bureau of Science Services Summary This is a preliminary list of insects that are either well known, or likely, to be closely associated with Wisconsin’s original native prairie. These species are mostly dependent upon remnants of original prairie, or plantings/restorations of prairie where their hosts have been re-established (see discussion below), and thus are rarely found outside of these settings. The list also includes some species tied to native ecosystems that grade into prairie, such as savannas, sand barrens, fens, sedge meadow, and shallow marsh. The list is annotated with known host(s) of each insect, and the likelihood of its presence in the state (see key at end of list for specifics). This working list is a byproduct of a prairie invertebrate study I coordinated from1995-2005 that covered 6 Midwestern states and included 14 cooperators. The project surveyed insects on prairie remnants and investigated the effects of fire on those insects. It was funded in part by a series of grants from the US Fish and Wildlife Service. So far, the list has 475 species. However, this is a partial list at best, representing approximately only ¼ of the prairie-specialist insects likely present in the region (see discussion below). Significant input to this list is needed, as there are major taxa groups missing or greatly under represented. Such absence is not necessarily due to few or no prairie-specialists in those groups, but due more to lack of knowledge about life histories (at least published knowledge), unsettled taxonomy, and lack of taxonomic specialists currently working in those groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Usands in Walton Co., Coming in from the Gulf, Flying in a Northerly Direction, but Only Near the Water
    NEW S Number 3 15 April 1969 of the Lepidopterists' Society Editorial Committee of the NEWS E. J. Newcomer, Editor 1509 Summitview, Yakima, Washington 98902, U. S. A. J. Donald Eff John Heath F. W. Preston H. A. Freeman G. Hesselbarth G. W. Rawson L. Paul Grey L. M. Martin Fred Thorne Richard He itzman Bryant Mather E. C. Welling M. L. D. Miller ANNUAL SUMMARY IN THIS ISSUE ... This Summary is one of the best. All coordinators got their reports to me in good time (March 27, and most of them earlier) and they were well written, which I appreciate very much as I cannot be familiar with conditions allover the area. I was a bit disappointed at the small nu.mber of reports received from my own Zone, only 6. Except of course, for Zones VIII and IX, from 15 to 31 reports came to the Coordinators, with a maximum of 31 for Zone I. The total was 135. -"'--Editor. SUMMARY OF MIGRATION There is more information than usual in this Summary about the migration of Vanessa cardui and Danaus plexippus, hence a summary of this migration is given here: V. cardui., --Migrating towards the NW in mid-March in Sonora, Mexico, but curiously no reports of this species from Arizona, New Mexico or Nevada. Migrating north in Cal if­ ornia, starting in San Diego Co., March 2 and reaching San Francisco Bay area March 27. Appearing in Colo. (Denver and vicinity) in early June. None reported north of these states. In the East, appeared in Missouri March 30 to early May; Iowa, April 10, maximum May 2-5 (see Iowa report for deatils); reached S.
    [Show full text]
  • Upland & Pollinator Plants Flip Book
    Pictures Ilex opaca Callicarpa americana American Holly Beautyberry Prunus serotina Pteridium aquilinum Black Cherry Bracken Fern Descriptions Callicarpa americana Ilex opaca The American beautyberry is a shrub, 6-9 ft in height. Shoot This tree grows to be 35 to 50 ft tall and 15 to 25 ft wide. growth occurs throughout much of the season. It is It has a dense, pyramid-shaped crown. characterized by its attractive foliage and clusters of flowers or fruit around the leaf nodes. Leaves Leaves Alternate, simple and laceolate or elliptic in shape, 2-4 inches long and 1-1.5 inches wide. Medium to dark, Simple, opposite or subopposite, and deciduous. 3-5” long green in color, and shiny or flat. Leaf margins are usually and 1-3” wide, oval shaped, with an acute apex. Leaf bases spiny and will be flat or wavy. are tapered, margins are serrate. Surfaces are green and usually glabrous above, paler and pubescent below. Flowers Petioles are short and slender. Small, green or white in color, fragrant and found in Flowers clusters in the leaf axils. Perfect, in sessile clusters around the leaf nodes Bark Fruit The bark is light gray and may be covered by wart-like growths. Because the bark is very thin, it is easily A 4-pitted lavender-pink, magenta, or violet drupe, about 1/4 damaged. inch in diameter. Lasts long into winter and is eaten by a variety of birds. Interesting Facts Trunk The preserved berries of this tree were used by American Indians as decorative buttons. Historically, the Older stems have a thin protective, light-brown bark.
    [Show full text]
  • Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations
    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations Revised Report and Documentation Prepared for: Department of Defense U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Submitted by: January 2004 Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations: Revised Report and Documentation CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary..........................................................................................iii 2.0 Introduction – Project Description................................................................. 1 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 NatureServe Data................................................................................................ 3 3.2 DOD Installations............................................................................................... 5 3.3 Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Nationwide Assessment of Species at Risk on DOD Installations..................... 8 4.2 Assessment of Species at Risk by Military Service.......................................... 13 4.3 Assessment of Species at Risk on Installations ................................................ 15 5.0 Conclusion and Management Recommendations.................................... 22 6.0 Future Directions.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Inventory at Missouri National Recreational River
    Inventory of Butterflies at Fort Union Trading Post and Knife River Indian Villages National Historic Sites in 2004 --<o>-- Final Report Submitted by: Ronald Alan Royer, Ph.D. Burlington, North Dakota 58722 Submitted to: Northern Great Plains Inventory & Monitoring Coordinator National Park Service Mount Rushmore National Memorial Keystone, South Dakota 57751 October 1, 2004 Executive Summary This document reports inventory of butterflies at Knife River Indian Villages National Historic Site (NHS) and Fort Union Trading Post NHS, both administered by the National Park Service in the state of North Dakota. Field work consisted of strategically timed visits throughout Summer 2004. The inventory employed “checklist” counting based on the author's experience with habitat for the various species expected from each site. This report is written in two separate parts, one for each site. Each part contains an annotated species list for that site. For possible later GIS use, noteworthy species encounters are reported by UTM coordinates, all of which are provided conveniently in a table within the report narrative for each site. An annotated listing is also included for each species at each site. Each of these provides a brief description of typical habitat, principal larval host(s), and information on adult phenology. This information is followed by abbreviated citations for published works in which more detailed information may be located. Recommendations are then made for each site on the basis of endemism, prairie butterfly conservation and
    [Show full text]
  • List of Insect Species Which May Be Tallgrass Prairie Specialists
    Conservation Biology Research Grants Program Division of Ecological Services © Minnesota Department of Natural Resources List of Insect Species which May Be Tallgrass Prairie Specialists Final Report to the USFWS Cooperating Agencies July 1, 1996 Catherine Reed Entomology Department 219 Hodson Hall University of Minnesota St. Paul MN 55108 phone 612-624-3423 e-mail [email protected] This study was funded in part by a grant from the USFWS and Cooperating Agencies. Table of Contents Summary.................................................................................................. 2 Introduction...............................................................................................2 Methods.....................................................................................................3 Results.....................................................................................................4 Discussion and Evaluation................................................................................................26 Recommendations....................................................................................29 References..............................................................................................33 Summary Approximately 728 insect and allied species and subspecies were considered to be possible prairie specialists based on any of the following criteria: defined as prairie specialists by authorities; required prairie plant species or genera as their adult or larval food; were obligate predators, parasites
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies and Moths of Comal County, Texas, United States
    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Apyrrothrix araxes Dull Firetip Phocides pigmalion Mangrove Skipper Phocides belus Belus Skipper Phocides palemon Guava Skipper Phocides urania Urania skipper Proteides mercurius Mercurial Skipper Epargyreus zestos Zestos Skipper Epargyreus clarus Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus spanna Hispaniolan Silverdrop Epargyreus exadeus Broken Silverdrop Polygonus leo Hammock Skipper Polygonus savigny Manuel's Skipper Chioides albofasciatus White-striped Longtail Chioides zilpa Zilpa Longtail Chioides ixion Hispaniolan Longtail Aguna asander Gold-spotted Aguna Aguna claxon Emerald Aguna Aguna metophis Tailed Aguna Typhedanus undulatus Mottled Longtail Typhedanus ampyx Gold-tufted Skipper Polythrix octomaculata Eight-spotted Longtail Polythrix mexicanus Mexican Longtail Polythrix asine Asine Longtail Polythrix caunus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) Zestusa dorus Short-tailed Skipper Codatractus carlos Carlos' Mottled-Skipper Codatractus alcaeus White-crescent Longtail Codatractus yucatanus Yucatan Mottled-Skipper Codatractus arizonensis Arizona Skipper Codatractus valeriana Valeriana Skipper Urbanus proteus Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus viterboana Bluish Longtail Urbanus belli Double-striped Longtail Urbanus pronus Pronus Longtail Urbanus esmeraldus Esmeralda Longtail Urbanus evona Turquoise Longtail Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail Urbanus teleus Teleus Longtail Urbanus tanna Tanna Longtail Urbanus simplicius Plain Longtail Urbanus procne Brown Longtail
    [Show full text]
  • Pawnee Montane Skipper Post-Fire Habitat Assessment Survey – August/September 2009 Pawnee Montane Skipper Post-Fire Habitat Assessment Survey – August/September 2009
    Pawnee Montane Skipper Post-fire Habitat Assessment Survey – August/September 2009 Pawnee Montane Skipper Post-fire Habitat Assessment Survey – August/September 2009 Prepared For U.S. Forest Service Pike and San Isabel National Forest South Platte Ranger District Morrison, Colorado U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Lakewood, Colorado And Denver Water Denver, Colorado Prepared by: John Sovell Colorado Natural Heritage Program Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University 1474 Campus Delivery Fort Collins, CO 80523-8002 http://www.cnhp.colostate.edu March 2010 Copyright © 2010 Colorado State University Colorado Natural Heritage Program All Rights Reserved Cover photograph: View of the forest in 2002 after the fire with beetle shaving at the base of a burned tree, by John Sovell ii TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background and Purpose .................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Study area Conditions in 2009 ............................................................................................ 4 2.0 PROJECT OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................... 5 3.0 PROJECT AREA .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • This Site Captures Roadside Habitat and Surrounding Second-Growth
    Seldom Seen Corners CA This site captures roadside habitat and surrounding second-growth deciduous forest that supports populations of Indian skipper butterfly ( Hesperia sassacus ) and long dash butterfly ( Polites mystic ), invertebrate species of conservation concern in Pennsylvania. Butterflies undergo four stages in their life cycle: egg, caterpillar, pupa, and adult. Once an adult female has mated, she seeks out the species of host plant appropriate for her species on which to lay her fertilized eggs. Most species lay their eggs on a plant that the newly hatched caterpillar will eat. When an egg hatches, a small caterpillar emerges and spends all its time eating and growing. As a caterpillar grows, it sheds its exoskeleton – usually three or four times – over Indian skipper butterfly. Photo: Will Cook the course of two to three weeks. During the caterpillar stage, the animal is highly vulnerable to predation by wasps and birds, parasitization by wasps or flies, or infection by fungal or viral pathogens; most caterpillars do not survive to the next stage of development. Once a caterpillar has reached full size, it attaches itself to a support and encases itself in a hard outer shell (chrysalis), and becomes a pupa. While in the pupa stage, the butterfly transforms into an adult. When the adult inside the chrysalis is fully formed, the chrysalis splits and the adult butterfly emerges (Glassberg 1999). Habitat for Indian skipper is old fields, pastures, and clearings. The caterpillars live in silken tubes at the base of grass clumps and leave them to feed. The older caterpillars overwinter and in the spring pupate in a loose cocoon.
    [Show full text]