Community Profile a Guide to the Unincorporated Communities of Alameda County: Ashland, Castro Valley, Cherryland, Fairview and San Lorenzo

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Community Profile a Guide to the Unincorporated Communities of Alameda County: Ashland, Castro Valley, Cherryland, Fairview and San Lorenzo asz 2008 Community Profile A guide to the unincorporated communities of Alameda County: Ashland, Castro Valley, Cherryland, Fairview and San Lorenzo Eden Area Livability Initiative: Integrated Strategic Vision & Plan First Edition February 20, 2008 Prepared by the Office of Supervisor Nate Miley, District 4, Alameda County Board of Supervisors L. Wicks i Last saved on 3/11/2008 L. Wicks ii Last saved on 3/11/2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART PAGE FOREWORD v INTRODUCTION: EDEN AREA LIVABILITY INITIATIVE 1 Mission, Goals, Objectives , and Background PURPOSE , STRUCTURE & DESCRIPTION OF THE COMMUNITY ANALYSIS 2 LIVABILITY PRINCIPLES 3 THRIVE ELEMENTS OF LIVABILITY 4-5 EXPLANATION OF DATA PART 1 6 Communities & Zip Codes Census data = Census Designated Place Community Descriptions Explanation of data, maps and boundaries of data comparison GEOGRAPHIC BOUNDARIES & MAPS PART 2 7- 12 HISTORY OF AREA PART 3 13-29 DEMOGRAPHICS PART4 30-58 Population 30 Percentage of Population, by age in Alameda County and in the Eden Area 31 Race 32-34 Language Spoken at Home 35 Educational Attainment 36-37 Grandparents as Caregivers 38 Disability Status of the Civilian non-institutionalized population 38 Nativity and Place of Birth 39-40 Employment Statistics 41 Occupation 42-44 Occupation Trends & Industries of Employment 46 Common Industries for Females 47 Common Occupations for Females 47 Income 48 Poverty 48 Housing 49-57 Household by Type Housing Occupancy and Tenure Housing Stock and Ownership Year Structure Built Year householder moved into unit Housing Value Selected monthly owner Costs as a percentage of Household Income in 1999 Gross rent Gross rent as a percentage of Household Income in 19 L. Wicks iii Last saved on 3/11/2008 Tax Base 58 COMMUNITY DATA SETS Transportation Modes and Major Routes of Travel PART 5 59-66 Personal vehicular travel Commuting to Work Public Transportation San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Alameda - Contra Costa Transit District (AC Transit) Pedestrian & Bicycle use Highways & and Frequented Roadways Business / Commercial PART 6 67-69 Business Base Industry Local Unions & Major Employers Religious and Faith Based Institutions and Organization PART 7 70-73 Community Based Organizations PART 8 73-82 Community Events 82 Civic Associations PART 9 83-86 Community Associations Chambers of Commerce Sports Clubs and Associations Service/Fraternal Organizations Community Events Crime Rate PART 10 87 Health PART 11 88-101 School System PART 12 102-106 Recreation & Library Facilities PART 13 107-109 Local Media PART 14 110 Local Politics PART 15 110-113 Municipal Public Service Delivery & Special Districts and Other PART 16 113-117 Locally Elected Boards County Agencies PART 17 118-119 Unincorporated Services Budget Summary PART 18 120-128 Municipal Plans PART 19 129-130 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 131 L. Wicks iv Last saved on 3/11/2008 FOREWORD The Unincorporated Area, with its diverse neighborhoods and interests, is a Supervisor Nate Miley dynamic region with tremendous potential to realize the needs and dreams of Alameda County all its residents. I am committed to working towards this vision and welcome Board of Supervisors, wide participation. A successful strategic vision for the Eden Area is dependent District 4 on the engagement of a broad group of stakeholders. As many who are reading this know, the urban unincorporated area of Alameda County is one of the largest jurisdictions in the County. The combined population of the communities of Ashland, Castro Valley, Cherryland, Fairview, Hillcrest Knolls, and San Lorenzo is approximately 140,000. If these communities were a city, it would be the fourth largest in Alameda County behind only Oakland, Fremont, and Hayward. The vast majority of this area is in Alameda County District 4, which I have had the honor of representing as your County Supervisor since 2001. From the beginning of my first term it has been clear to me that residents are proud of the unique characteristics and histories of the individual unincorporated communities and want to retain their individual community identities. At the same time, the small and under‐resourced nature of most of these communities creates some disadvantages compared to neighboring cities when competing for economic and community development, creating and implementing desirable land‐use policy, and in other ways that determine “optimum livability.” The area’s identity is obscured, in part, because it is defined by what it is not: a municipality. Equally important the area’s identity and cohesiveness is that it is served by many jurisdictions. Some of these include a number of County agencies, several school districts, two transportation agencies, a hospital district, several fire departments, and sanitary districts as well as a parks and recreation district. While each of these public agencies is no doubt committed to the betterment of its constituents, each agency’s vision will always be too narrow to take in the broad needs and desires of all residents. In addition, while some residents are actively engaged in a broad range of issues impacting individual communities, broader community participation is ideal and necessary to reach meaningful consensus for a community‐wide vision. Like many jurisdictions, Unincorporated Alameda County lacks coordination among the public and quasi‐public agencies that serve this area. As a result, services may be duplicative or suffer from gaps. Also, residents may have to take their concerns to numerous bodies. Additionally, a lack of coordination can result in missed opportunities to partner and leverage funds in an already underserved area. Equally important is our desire to fully engage community residents and other stakeholders in the overall planning process. Community members should have an opportunity to engage in this process at multiple levels, from more long‐term positions of leadership to sharing their views at a single event. The end results of this process should be list of identified catalyst projects that best support the community’s identified needs, sense of itself and promotes a greater range of community representation and involvement. Our desire to develop a more cohesive community‐driven vision of a livable community as well as to identify and develop the leaders of this community to continue to advocate for community needs well beyond the project duration. I send my appreciation to all the support my office has received while developing this document. L. Wicks Sincerely, v Last saved on 3/11/2008 INTRODUCTION The Eden Area Livability Initiative is an integrated partnership between the community, the county and the non-county public sector jurisdictions that have a stake in the unincorporated urban areas of Alameda County. The Livability Initiative is the strategic development of a shared vision and plan and builds pride for the unincorporated urban areas of Alameda County. Mission: To create, strengthen and sustain a livable community in the urban unincorporated areas of Alameda County. Goals: → To encourage planning and action across disciplines and interest areas → To engage the community in a significant way → To call for County Agencies to collaborate in new ways → To build stronger partnerships between the County, other jurisdictions and the community. Objectives → To increase community participation in decisions that affect the community → To find a shared community vision → To ensure coordination and implementation of this vision and plan between the County government and the community → To strengthen relationships between government and the community → To ensure appropriate policy formation and implementation → To make the unincorporated communities of Alameda County a great place to live, work, and play! BACKGROUND Alameda County launched the Eden Area Livability Initiative (EALI) in December of 2004, spearheaded by Alameda County Supervisor Nate Miley, with the goal of improving the livability of the community of the western part of the unincorporated areas of Alameda County (referred to hereafter as the “Eden Area”). The western part of unincorporated Alameda County is comprised of several community-identified communities, such as Ashland, Cherryland, Castro Valley, Fairview, and San Lorenzo, along with several community-identified neighborhoods within the larger communities such as Fairmont Terrace, El Portal Ridge, Hillcrest Knolls, San Lorenzo Village, Five Canyons, and others. These communities are located within very close proximity to each other, share borders and contain approximately 130, 000 residents. EALI developed from the formulation of the Livability Principles, based on the Ahwahnee Principles, which identify regional and local beliefs that will be used to guide the development of an integrated approach for future planning, development, land use and all aspects of service delivery (including education, infrastructure, fire, recreation, public health, public safety, and public works) decisions within the Eden Area. It is anticipated that these Livability Principles and later developed “Livability Elements” will serve to encourage integration throughout the departments of Alameda County governed by the Board of Supervisors, and as a basis to improve cross-jurisdictional coordination among the various agencies serving the residents of the unincorporated area, but not governed by the Board of Supervisors. Throughout the life of the Initiative, community members have played a vital role in the development and the direction of the process. Several community
Recommended publications
  • Bicycle Master Plan in 2007
    CITY OF HAYWARD BICYCLE MASTER PLAN October 2007 Prepared by Alta Planning + Design This page left blank intentionally. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1. Introduction..................................................................................................................................................1-1 1.1. Why Bicycling?.............................................................................................................................1-1 1.2. Purpose of the Bicycle Master Plan ...........................................................................................1-1 1.3. Summary of Changes between 1997 and 2006 Plans ...............................................................1-2 1.4. Plan Contents...............................................................................................................................1-4 2. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 2. Goals and Objectives...................................................................................................................................2-1 2.1. New Facilities...............................................................................................................................2-1 2.2. Bicycle Commuting and Recreational Opportunities ...............................................................2-1 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS 3. Existing Conditions......................................................................................................................................3-1 3.1. Setting...........................................................................................................................................3-1
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Hayward Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
    EARTHQUAKE SEA LEVEL RISE FLOOD DROUGHT CLIMATE CHANGE LANDSLIDE HAZARDOUS WILDFIRE TSUNAMI MATERIALS LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2 016 CITY OF heart of the bay TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................................... 4 TABLE OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................... 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 RISK ASSESSMENT & ASSET EXPOSURE ......................................................................................... 6 EARTHQUAKE ................................................................................................................................. 6 FIRE ............................................................................................................................................... 6 LANDSLIDE ..................................................................................................................................... 6 FLOOD, TSUNAMI, AND SEA LEVEL RISE .......................................................................................... 6 DROUGHT ....................................................................................................................................... 6 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ................................................................................................................. 7 MITIGATION STRATEGIES ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural and Paleontological Resources
    LSA ASSOCIATES, INC EBRPD WILDFIRE HAZARD REDUCTION AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN EIR JULY 2009 IV. SETTING, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION E. CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES E. CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section provides an overview of the potential presence of cultural and paleontological resources in the Study Area of the East Bay Regional Parks District’s (EBRPD’s) Wildfire Hazard Reduction and Resource Management Plan (Plan) the proposed project. Also included is a discussion of potential impacts to such resources as a result of project implementation, as well as mitigation recommendations, as warranted. LSA Associates, Inc., provided EBRPD with a more detailed report concerning cultural and paleontological resources that is available for review at EBRPD’s Administrative Headquarters 2950 Peralta Oaks Court, Oakland CA. The lands managed by EBRPD are home to a wide range of cultural and paleontological resources. These resources contribute to the diverse historical and geological background of the San Francisco Bay Area, and are unique, nonrenewable community assets. Such resources on EBRPD lands include, but are not limited to, prehistoric and historical archaeological sites, historical buildings and structures, areas of traditional or religious value to contemporary communities, and fossiliferous geological deposits. 1. Setting This subsection describes the existing conditions for cultural and paleontological resources in the Study Area. The subsection begins with a description of the methods used to obtain background information, followed by an overview of the Study Area’s prehistory, ethnography, history, and paleontology/geology. A summary of recorded cultural and paleontological resources in the Study Area follows. Finally, the legislative context for cultural and paleontological resources is presented.
    [Show full text]
  • East Bay Regional Parks Insert in This Issue
    Have a merry East Bay Crippsmas! Music at the Mission ‘Love Regional Triangle’ Parks Insert in Page 40 this issue Page 32 The newspaper for the new millennium 510-494-1999 [email protected] www.tricityvoice.com December 9, 2014 Vol. 13 No. 49 SUBMITTED BY YOKO’S DANCE & PERFORMING ARTS ACADEMY PHOTOS BY ERIN LAMOYNE his year marks the tenth anniversary of Yoko’s Dance and Performing Arts Acad- T emy’s “Nutcracker” production. In 2005, Yoko Young, founder of the academy, choreo- graphed the full ballet for her dancers to perform on stage for Fremont and its surrounding commu- nities. She loved the holiday tradition of “The Nutcracker” and wanted local children and adults to be able to experience it. Sadly, at the end of Oc- tober last year Yoko passed away. She had always been an active and beloved member of Fremont, so Mayor Bill Harrison declared December 15 Yoko Young Day for the City of Fremont. Eighty-five student dancers, ages 5 to 18, will carry on Yoko’s much-loved tradition with three performances of “The Nutcracker” at the Ohlone College Smith Center on December 13 and 14. The role of Clara will be performed by Celeste Kay Lau, Kristin Leung, and Erin Wengrow; the continued on page 12 This free performance (no tickets are necessary) is sponsored by the Fremont Bank Foundation. SUBMITTED BY JIM CARTER Claus. So be certain to bring the kids and grandkids – they’ll love it. njoy an evening of holiday music This free performance (no tickets are provided free of charge by the Tri- necessary) is sponsored by the Fremont E City area’s 50-musician symphony, Bank Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Street, Hayward, CA 94541 (510) 881-6700
    Minutes – July 25, 2011 – Page 1. Hayward Area Recreation and Park District 1099 “E” Street, Hayward, CA 94541 (510) 881-6700 M I N U T E S March 26, 2012 MEETING The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Hayward Area Recreation and Park District was called to order by President Waespi at 5:30 p.m. on Monday, March 26, 2012 in the Board Room of the Administration Building at 1099 ‘E’ Street, Hayward. BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ President Waespi announced that the Board of Directors would adjourn the CLOSED SESSION meeting to hold a Closed Session for a meeting with designated representatives to discuss negations with the SEIU 1021 Bargaining Unit of the Hayward Area Recreation and Park District, followed by a meeting with Legal Counsel regarding existing litigation in the case of the Hayward Area Recreation and Park District and Alameda County regarding 16301 and 16635 E. 14th Street, San Leandro, CA. RECONVENE TO The Board Meeting reconvened at 7:01 p.m. and was followed by the REGULAR SESSION Pledge of Allegiance and Roll Call. PLEDGE TO FLAG The Pledge of Allegiance was followed by Roll Call. PRESENT Directors: Andrade, Hodges, Jameson, Pereira, Waespi Staff: Ely, Giammona, Gouveia, Lepore, Hamid CLOSED SESSION President Waespi reported that the Board of Directors held a Closed Session ANNOUNCEMENT at 5:30 p.m. on this date as reported above at which no reportable action was taken. MONTHLY VOLUNTEER President Waespi postponed presentation of the Monthly Volunteer RECOGNITION AWARD Recognition Award to the Monday, April 9, 2012 Board of Directors’ meeting, as the recipient of the February 2012 award, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • American Era in the Mid-19Th Century, Most of the Rancho and Pueblo
    American Era In the mid-19th century, most of the rancho and pueblo lands in California were subdivided as the result of population growth and the American takeover. The initial explosion in population was associated with the Gold Rush (1848), followed later by the construction of the transcontinental railroad (1869). The growth of the general project area was dependent on transportation-first by I water and roads and later, by rail and then by air. I The modern City of Hayward had its origins in the 1850s, during the Gold Rush, when squatters and settlers began to appear in the area. The City lay within the boundaries of Rancho San Lorenzo, a 17,000-acre estate granted in 1821 to the Mexican colonist Guillermo Castro. William Hayward occupied a tent in 1851 in Palomares Canyon. In 1854, Castro had a map surveyed for a town covering 28 blocks in the vicinity of his adobe and began selling land to settlers. 4.5.2.3 Paleontological Resources As noted above, paleontological resources are the fossilized remains of organisms from prehistoric environments ground in geologic strata. Most of the city of Hayward is located on Quaternary sedimentary deposits which are from the most recent geologic periods (i.e., Holocene, Pleistocene) dating back to 1.6 million years ago. Some of eastern Hayward is located on Mesozoic sedimentary rocks from the Mesozoic period dating back to 245 million years ago, when dinosaurs roamed the earth. Both types of geologic rocks may contain fossils of flora and fauna, particularly marine species. According to the General Plan Background Report, five paleontological resources have previously been discovered in the City of Hayward, including four mammalian fossils (e.g., bison, prehistoric horse) and one gastropod fossil (i.e., marine snail) from the Quaternary period.
    [Show full text]
  • Bart at Twenty: Land Use and Development Impacts
    ffional Development BART@20: Land Use and Development Impacts Robert Cervero with research assistance by Carlos Castellanos, Wicaksono Sarosa, and Kenneth Rich July 1995 University of California at Berkeley - 1 BART@20: Land Use and Development Impacts Robert Cervero with Research Assistance by Carlos Castellanos, Wicaksono Sarosa, and Kenneth Rich This paper was produced with support provided by the U.S. Department of Transportation and the California State Department of Transportation (Caltrans) through the University of California Transportation Center. University of California at Berkeley Institute of Urban and Regional Development Table of Contents ONE: BART at 20: An Analysis of Land Use Impacts 1 1. INTRODUCTION 1 TWO: Research Approach and Data Sources 3 THREE: Employment and Population Changes in BART and Non-BART Areas 6 3.1. Population Changes 6 3.2. Employment Changes 3.3. Population Densities 15 3.4. Employment Densities 15 3.5. Summary 20 FOUR: Land Use Changes Over Time and by Corridor 21 4.1. General Land-Use Trends 23 4.2. Pre-BART versus Post-BART 25 4.3. Early versus Later BART 30 4.4. Trends in Non-Residential Densities 33 4.4. Summary 37 FIVE: Land-Use Changes by Station Classes 38 5.1. Grouping Variables 38 5.2. Classification 38 5.3. Station Classes 41 5.4. Trends in Residential and Non-Residential Growth Among Station Classes 44 5.5. Percent Growth in Early- versus Later-BART Years Among Station Classes 46 5.6. Trends in Non-Residential Densities Among Station Classes 46 SLX: Matched-Pair Comparisons of Land-Use Changes near BART Stations Versus Freeway Interchanges 51 6.1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Geographic History of San Lorenzo Creek Watershed
    A GEOGRAPHIC HISTORY OF SAN LORENZO CREEK WATERSHED LANDSCAPE PATTERNS UNDERLYING HUMAN ACTIVITIES IN THE LANDS OF THE YRGIN MISSION SAN JOSE RANCHO, 1796-1834 SAN LEANDRO, SAN LORENZO, AND SAN RAMON RANCHOS, 1830s-1849 TOWNS OF HAYWARD’S, SQUATTERSVILLE, AND MT EDEN, 1850s CITIES OF HAYWARD, SAN LORENZO, AND CASTRO VALLEY Robin Grossinger and Elise Brewster San Francisco Estuary Institute Regional Watershed Program Prepared for the Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Clean Water Program SFEI Contribution 85 December 2003 Some agents of change in the San Lorenzo Creek watershed, 1769-2003. Rainfall data (July-June year) compiled by Lester McKee from Hayward data, using correlation to early San Francisco rainfall records that were developed by Jan Null (ggweather.com). Local flooding data from FEMA 1986 and Modrell (pers. comm.). Mission livestock data from Jackson 1994. Population data from Eden Writers 1975. San Francisco Estuary Institute 2 San Lorenzo Creek Landscape Patterns in the San Lorenzo Creek Watershed and Surrounding Areas Table of Contents San Lorenzo Creek Watershed ……………………………………………………………………………. 2 San Lorenzo Creek …………………………………………………………………………………………… 2 Alluvial Plain …………………………………………………………………………………….……………. 5 The Bay - Tidal Marshland ………………………………………………………….……………………. 6 Salt Ponds ………………………………………………………….………………………………………….. 7 Landings ……………………………………………………………………………………………….………. 7 Mission San Jose Rangeland ………………………………………………………………….……….. 9 Diramaderos - Sausals - Indian Grant - San Lorenzo Grove …………………….……………
    [Show full text]
  • City of Hayward
    CITY OF HAYWARD Hayward City Hall 777 B Street Hayward, CA 94541 www.Hayward-CA.gov Agenda Thursday, August 2, 2018 3:00 PM Hayward Shoreline Interpretive Center 4901 Breakwater Avenue Hayward Area Shoreline Planning Agency Hayward Area Shoreline Planning Agenda August 2, 2018 Agency A Joint Powers Authority Comprised of the East Bay Regional Park District, the Hayward Area Recreation and Park District, and the City of Hayward 3:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER 3:02 PM - INTRODUCTIONS 1. MIN 18-101 Approval of the HASPA Minutes of April 12, 2018 Attachments: Attachment I Draft HASPA Minutes of April 12 2018 3:05 PM - PUBLIC COMMENTS: The Public Comment section provides an opportunity to address the Oversight Board on items not listed on the agenda. The Board welcomes your comments and requests that speakers present their remarks in a respectful manner, within established time limits, and focus on issues which directly affect the Board or are within the jurisdiction of the Board as the Board is prohibited by State law from discussing items not listed on the agenda, your item will be taken under consideration and may be referred to staff. 3:15 PM - REPORTS: Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) 2. RPT 18-139 Caltrans SB1 Grant Application (Lee) Attachments: Draft Reso and MOU 3. ClimateCorps Fellow (Lee) 4. Industrial Zoning District Regulations Update (Lee) 5. 2018 Measure AA Grant Application (Lee) 6. Shrinking Shores Project (De Ponte) 7. RPT 18-141 Draft Budget Attachments: Draft Budget 8. South Bay Salt Ponds EIR (Hamlat) 9. Additional Items as
    [Show full text]
  • From Rancho to Recreation Rec
    Don Castro Reg. From Rancho to Recreation Rec. Area R ST. TO REACH LAKE CHABOT MARINA TE N BL. CE GRO From I-580 in San Leandro, exit at Fairmont Drive and go CYN VE . WAY RD . east (uphill). (Note that Fairmont Drive becomes Lake L Anthony Lands that became Grass Valley Regional Park in FISHING The lake is well-stocked and is a popular and lawns are provided. Campers may hike to the lake BL. THILL Park. The Skyline Trail extends northwest through CROW B . Y AV E Chabot Road.) The Marina entrance will be on the left at L 580 FOO L 1952 (later Anthony Chabot and Lake Chabot regional Bay Area fishing destination. It is also an ideal location for fishing. Daily Fishing Access Permits and firewood A Redwood, Tilden, and other Regional Parks to Wildcat MISSION V O HEYER R T S C D. A R BL. the bottom of the hill (parking fee). From I-580 west- N parks) were on territory east of what would become for kids out for their first fishing experience. are sold at the campground. The campground’s loca- Y AD Canyon Regional Park in Richmond. The Bay Area C . L RO G N I L L L E B W E bound in Castro Valley, take the Strobridge Avenue exit. L L AD T S U RO L R Chabot L Oakland and San Leandro, an area where Native All California Fish and Game regulations apply. A tion is convenient for people visiting San Francisco and C I Ridge Trail currently begins at Pinole Valley Park in H A 238 N AD E LLEY V Turn right on Strobridge, right on Castro Valley Boule- E B S .
    [Show full text]
  • I. Presentation Summary II. Key Takeaways
    City of Hayward Downtown Specific Plan Task Force Meeting #1 Summary Notes December 12, 2016 6:00pm – 8:00pm Hayward City Hall, 777 B St, Hayward, CA 94541 Conference Room 2A I. Presentation Summary On December 12, 2016, the City of Hayward and lead consultant Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. (LWC) held the first Task Force meeting for the Downtown Hayward Specific Plan (Project). LWC presented an overview of the project with an accompanying PowerPoint presentation on the makeup of the consultant team, task force purpose and role, outreach program, meetings to date, and schedule and next steps. Following the presentation, LWC posed four questions to the Task Force and other meeting attendees on Downtown Hayward: 1) Key Issues, 2) Strengths, 3) Greatest Opportunities for Improvement, and 4) How Can the Specific Plan Help. Findings from the discussion are summarized below. II. Key Takeaways Community outreach efforts should consider broader audiences, and reach out to local high schools, senior centers, neighborhoods outside of the Downtown, and large employers – including advanced manufacturing and biotech companies that have recently located to Hayward. Homelessness has and will continue to be a major issue impacting the perception of safety Downtown. Pedestrian and bicycle safety should be a priority of the planning effort. Despite the close community and attractive amenities, Downtown lacks a sense of place and identity. Vacancies are a problem in Downtown, largely because of absentee landlords who have little or no connection or commitment to the community or incentive to improve their properties. There is a potential to build off of the “family friendly” environment and reputation of Downtown.
    [Show full text]
  • Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, Circa 1852-1904
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/hb109nb422 Online items available Finding Aid to the Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, circa 1852-1904 Finding Aid written by Michelle Morton and Marie Salta, with assistance from Dean C. Rowan and Randal Brandt The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ © 2008, 2013 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Finding Aid to the Documents BANC MSS Land Case Files 1852-1892BANC MSS C-A 300 FILM 1 Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in Cali... Finding Aid to the Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, circa 1852-1904 Collection Number: BANC MSS Land Case Files The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Finding Aid Written By: Michelle Morton and Marie Salta, with assistance from Dean C. Rowan and Randal Brandt. Date Completed: March 2008 © 2008, 2013 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Collection Summary Collection Title: Documents pertaining to the adjudication of private land claims in California Date (inclusive): circa 1852-1904 Collection Number: BANC MSS Land Case Files 1852-1892 Microfilm: BANC MSS C-A 300 FILM Creators : United States. District Court (California) Extent: Number of containers: 857 Cases. 876 Portfolios. 6 volumes (linear feet: Approximately 75)Microfilm: 200 reels10 digital objects (1494 images) Repository: The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ Abstract: In 1851 the U.S.
    [Show full text]