Tanzania & Kenya Luxury Safari
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Supervisory Committee
Costs and Benefits of Nature-Based Tourism to Conservation and Communities in the Serengeti Ecosystem by Masuruli Baker Masuruli BSc. Sokoine University of Agriculture, 1993 MSc. University of Kent, 1997 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of Geography Masuruli Baker Masuruli, 2014 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This dissertation may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee Costs and Benefits of Nature-Based Tourism to Conservation and Communities in the Serengeti Ecosystem by Masuruli Baker Masuruli BSc. Sokoine University of Agriculture, 1993 MSc. University of Kent, 1997 Supervisory Committee Dr. Philip Dearden (Department of Geography) Co-Supervisor Dr. Rick Rollins (Department of Geography) Co-Supervisor Dr. Leslie King (Department of Geography) Departmental Member Dr. Ana Maria Peredo (Peter B. Gustavson School of Business, University of Victoria) Outside Member iii Abstract Supervisory Committee Dr. Philip Dearden (Department of Geography) Co-Supervisor Dr. Rick Rollins (Department of Geography) Co-Supervisor Dr. Leslie King (Department of Geography) Departmental Member Dr. Ana Maria Peredo (Peter B. Gustavson School of Business, University of Victoria) Outside Member People visit protected areas (PAs) for enjoyment and appreciation of nature. However, tourism that is not well planned and managed can significantly degrade the environment, and impact negatively on nearby communities. Of further concern is the distribution of the costs and benefits of nature-based tourism (NBT) in PAs, with some communities experiencing proportionally more benefits, while other communities experience more of the cost. -
Small Carnivore Conservation Action Plan
Durant, S. M., Foley, C., Foley, L., Kazaeli, C., Keyyu, J., Konzo, E., Lobora, A., Magoma, N., Mduma, S., Meing'ataki, G. E. O., Midala, B. D. V. M., Minushi, L., Mpunga, N., Mpuya, P. M., Rwiza, M., and Tibyenda, R. The Tanzania Small Carnivore Conservation Action Plan. Durant, S. M., De Luca, D., Davenport, T. R. B., Mduma, S., Konzo, S., and Lobora, A. Report: 162-269. 2009. Arusha, Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute. Keywords: 1TZ/abundance/action plan/caracal/Caracal caracal/conservation/conservation action plan/distribution/ecology/Felis silvestris/Leptailurus serval/serval/wildcat Abstract: This report covers the proceedings of the First Tanzania Small Carnivore Conservation Action Plan Workshop held at TAWIRI on 19th-21st April 2006. The workshop brought together key stakeholders to assess existing information and establish a consensus on priorities for research and conservation for 28 species of small to medium carnivore in Tanzania (excluding cheetah, wild dogs, aardwolf, spotted hyaena, striped hyaena, leopard and lion, all of which were covered in other workshops). Recent records were used to confirm the presence of 27 of these species in Tanzania. These were three species of cats or felids: serval (Leptailurus serval); caracal (Caracal caracal) and wild cat (Felis silvestris). Five mustelids: Cape clawless otter (Aonyx capensis); spotted-necked otter (Hydrictis maculicollis); honey badger (Mellivora capensis); striped weasel (Poecilogale albinucha); and zorilla (Ictonyx striatus). Four canids: bat-eared fox (Otocyon megalotis); black-backed jackal (Canis mesomelas); golden jackal (Canis aureus); side-striped jackal (Canis adustus). Four viverrids: common genet (Genetta genetta); large-spotted genet (Genetta maculata); servaline genet (Genetta servalina); and African civet (Viverra civettina). -
Combating Poaching and Illegal Logging in Tanzania Voices of the Rangers – Hands-On Experiences from the Field
ENVIRONMENTAL CRIME SERIES ENVIRONMENTAL CRIME SERIES ENVIRONMENTAL CRIME SERIES COMBATING POACHING AND ILLEGAL LOGGING IN TANZANIA VOICES OF THE RANGERS – HANDS-ON EXPERIENCES FROM THE FIELD 1 Editorial Team Frode Smeby, Consultant, GRID-Arendal Rune Henriksen, Consultant, GRID-Arendal Christian Nellemann, GRID-Arendal (Current address: Rhipto Rapid Response Unit, Norwegian Center for Global Analyses) Contributors Benjamin Kijika, Commander, Lake Zone Anti-Poaching Unit Rosemary Kweka, Pasiansi Wildlife Institute Lupyana Mahenge, Lake Zone Anti-Poaching Unit Valentin Yemelin, GRID-Arendal Luana Karvel, GRID-Arendal Anonymous law enforcement officers from across Tanzania. The rangers have been anonymized in order to protect them from the risk of retributions. The authors gratefully acknowledge the sharing of information and experiences by these rangers, who risk their lives every day in the name of conservation. Cartography Riccardo Pravettoni All photos © Frode Smeby and Rune Henriksen Norad is gratefully acknowledged for providing the necessary ENVIRONMENTAL CRIME SERIES funding for the project and the production of this publication. 2 COMBATING POACHING AND ILLEGAL LOGGING IN TANZANIA VOICES OF THE RANGERS – HANDS-ON EXPERIENCES FROM THE FIELD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 WILDLIFE CRIME 6 ILLEGAL LOGGING 9 CHARCOAL 10 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 12 WILDLIFE CRIME 15 EXPERIENCES 16 CHALLENGES 17 SITUATION OF THE LAKE ZONE ANTI-POACHING UNIT 21 FIELD EVALUATION OF LAKE ZONE ANTI-POACHING UNIT 23 UGALLA GAME RESERVE 29 ILLEGAL LOGGING 35 CORRUPTION AND -
Profile on Environmental and Social Considerations in Tanzania
Profile on Environmental and Social Considerations in Tanzania September 2011 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) CRE CR(5) 11-011 Table of Content Chapter 1 General Condition of United Republic of Tanzania ........................ 1-1 1.1 General Condition ............................................................................... 1-1 1.1.1 Location and Topography ............................................................. 1-1 1.1.2 Weather ........................................................................................ 1-3 1.1.3 Water Resource ............................................................................ 1-3 1.1.4 Political/Legal System and Governmental Organization ............... 1-4 1.2 Policy and Regulation for Environmental and Social Considerations .. 1-4 1.3 Governmental Organization ................................................................ 1-6 1.4 Outline of Ratification/Adaptation of International Convention ............ 1-7 1.5 NGOs acting in the Environmental and Social Considerations field .... 1-9 1.6 Trend of Aid Agency .......................................................................... 1-14 1.7 Local Knowledgeable Persons (Consultants).................................... 1-15 Chapter 2 Natural Environment .................................................................. 2-1 2.1 General Condition ............................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Wildlife Species .................................................................................. -
Improving Conservation Efforts in the Serengeti Ecosystem, Tanzania: an Examination of Knowledge, Benefits, Costs, and Attitudes
Improving conservation efforts in the Serengeti ecosystem, Tanzania: an examination of knowledge, benefits, costs, and attitudes A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Jennifer Ann Schmitt IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Stephen Polasky, adviser January, 2010 © Jennifer Ann Schmitt January 2010 Acknowledgements Thank you to the Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute (TAWIRI), Tanzanian National Parks (TANAPA), and the Tanzanian Commission for Science and Technology (COSTECH) for permission to carry out my research in Tanzania. I am thankful for Savannas Forever Tanzania, its directors Dr. Craig Packer and Susan James and especially the dedicated field team: Martin Andimile, Andrew Ferdinand, Florentina Julius, Alais Lendii, Cecilia Lukindo, Emmanuel Lyimo, Mwila Mbegu, David Mollel and Gerald Mollel. Their support and assistance in the design, implementation, and recording of questionnaires was integral to my dissertation. Thank you to those who helped fund my research including: Frankfurt Zoological Society, University of Minnesota Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences, University of Minnesota International Doctoral Dissertation International Research Grant, and Savannas Forever Tanzania. I also wish to thank the initial funders of Savannas Forever Tanzania, including the Friedkin Family Foundation and the United States Agency for International Development. I am grateful for the village leaders and villagers of Bonchugu, Bukore, Engaresero, Iramba Ndogo, Mariwanda, Mbushi, Misseke, Mwamhongo, Nata Mbiso, Nyamburi, Nyanza, Oldonyosambu, Oloirien Magaiduru, Piyaya, Robanda, Sakasaka, Samunge, Sapa, Singisi, and Soitsambu for participating in this study and welcoming the Savannas Forever field team. Thank you as well to the villages of Majengo, Meserani C, Minjingu, Naitolia, Orkesumet, Orngadida, Sangaiwe, and Terrat where we initially piloted our study questionnaires. -
Terrestrial Kbas in the Great Lakes Region (Arranged Alphabetically)
Appendix 1. Terrestrial KBAs in the Great Lakes Region (arranged alphabetically) Terrestrial KBAs Country Map No.1 Area (ha) Protect AZE3 Pressure Biological Other Action CEPF ion2 Priority4 funding5 Priority6 EAM7 Ajai Wildlife Reserve Uganda 1 15,800 **** medium 4 1 3 Akagera National Park Rwanda 2 100,000 *** medium 3 3 3 Akanyaru wetlands Rwanda 3 30,000 * high 4 0 2 Bandingilo South Sudan 4 1,650,000 **** unknown 4 3 3 Bangweulu swamps (Mweru ) Zambia 5 1,284,000 *** high 4 3 2 Belete-Gera Forest Ethiopia 6 152,109 **** unknown 3 3 3 Y Bonga forest Ethiopia 7 161,423 **** medium 2 3 3 Y Budongo Forest Reserve Uganda 8 79,300 **** medium 2 3 3 Y Bugoma Central Forest Uganda 9 40,100 low 2 3 3 **** Y Reserve Bugungu Wildlife Reserve Uganda 10 47,300 **** medium 4 3 3 Y Bulongwa Forest Reserve Tanzania 11 203 **** unknown 4 0 3 Y Burigi - Biharamulo Game Tanzania 12 350,000 unknown 4 0 3 **** Reserves Bururi Forest Nature Reserve Burundi 13 1,500 **** medium 3 1 3 Y Busia grasslands Kenya 14 250 * very high 4 1 2 Bwindi Impenetrable National Uganda 15 32,700 low 1 3 3 **** Y Park 1 See Basin level maps in Appendix 6. 2 Categorised * <10% protected; ** 10-49% protected; *** 50-90% protected: **** >90% protected. 3 Alliaqnce for Zero Extinction site (Y = yes). See section 2.2.2. 4 See Section 9.2. 5 0 – no funding data; 1 – some funding up to US$50k allocated; 2 – US$50-US$250k; 3 – >US$250k. -
Safari in Tanzania 10 Nights / 11 Days 2019
Safari in Tanzania 10 nights / 11 days 2019 www.tanganyika.com Safari in Tanzania 10 nights / 11 days 2019 Day 1 Kilimanjaro Airport / Arumeru river Lodge Meet and greet at Kilimanjaro airport upon arrival Optional: Visas can be issued upon arrival with our assistance under customs Private transfer to Arumeru River Lodge. Rest of the day at leisure. Dinner & overnight at Arumeru River Lodge (4****) Jour 2 Arumeru / Arusha National Park Leave lodge after breakfast and make your way to Arusha National Park, only about 30/40 mn away from the lodge. Nestled at the foot of Mount Meru, Arusha National park offers breathtaking view over the mountain as well as nearby Mt Kilimanjaro and its eternal snows. A good number of African species can be found in this park : girafes, antelopes, hippos, buffalos and the famous Black and White Colobus Monkey. Picnic lunch in Arusha National Park. Then head back to lodge in the afternoon Dinner & overnight at Arumeru River Lodge (4****) Day 3 Arumeru / Tarangire / Maweninga Camp Depart from River Trees after breakfast and make your way towards Tarangire National Park. Full day game drive in Tarangire with picnic lunch. This 2 600 sqm park is the home of rare species such as the Gerenuk, small Kudu, and Oryx… Late Summer & Autumn is a great time to game drive in this park and lots can be seen: Big cats, Elephants (thousands can even be seen in one day!), Giraffes, Buffalos… Dinner & overnight at Maweninga Camp www.maweninga-camp.com Maweninga camp is installed atop a great granite massif, in the north-west of Tarangire National Park. -
Cross-Boundary Human Impacts Compromise the Serengeti-Mara Ecosystem
This is a repository copy of Cross-boundary human impacts compromise the Serengeti- Mara ecosystem. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/144632/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Veldhuis, Michiel P., Ritchie, Mark E., Ogutu, Joseph O. et al. (10 more authors) (2019) Cross-boundary human impacts compromise the Serengeti-Mara ecosystem. Science. 1424–1428. ISSN 0036-8075 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav0564 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Title: The Serengeti squeeze: cross-boundary human impacts compromise an iconic protected ecosystem Authors: Michiel P. Veldhuis1*, Mark E. Ritchie2, Joseph O. Ogutu3, Thomas A. Morrison4, Colin M. Beale5, Anna B. Estes6,7, William Mwakilema8, Gordon O. Ojwang1,9, Catherine L. Parr 10,11,12, James Probert10, Patrick W. Wargute9, J. Grant C. Hopcraft4 and Han Olff1 Affiliations: -
Making Wildlife Economica Lly Viable for Communities
E FOR ABL Y VI LL ANZANIA AROUND THE WESTERN IVING L SERENGETI, T IUCN The World Conservation Union COMMUNITIES MAKING WILDLIFE ECONOMICA BIODIVERSITY ECONOMICS FOR EASTERN AFRICA IUCN - The World Conservation Union Eastern Africa Regional Office PO Box 68200 Lucy Emerton Nairobi, KENYA & Iddi Mfunda Tel: ++254 2 890 605-12 Fax: ++ 254 2 890 615 March 1999 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION TO THE CASE STUDY.........................................................................................2 2. BACKGROUND TO THE WESTERN SERENGETI.........................................................................4 2.1 The Serengeti ecosystem.........................................................................................4 2.2 Land use and wildlife management..........................................................................5 2.3 The Western Serengeti area ....................................................................................6 3. CHANGING APPROACHES TO CONSERVATION AND COMMUNITY BENEFIT- GENERATION ......................................................................................................................................10 3.1 Protection and economic isolation.........................................................................10 3.2 Community outreach.............................................................................................11 3.3 Integrated ecosystem conservation and development.............................................11 3.4 The changing local economic impact of conservation approaches -
The Management of Protected Areas in Serengeti Ecosystem: a Case Study of Ikorongo and Grumeti Game Reserves (Iggrs)
Research Inventy: International Journal of Engineering And Science Vol.6, Issue 11 (December 2016), PP -22-50 Issn (e): 2278-4721, Issn (p):2319-6483, www.researchinventy.com The Management of Protected Areas in Serengeti Ecosystem: A Case Study of Ikorongo and Grumeti Game Reserves (IGGRs) Zella, Adili .Y Department of Economic Studies The Mwalimu Nyerere Memorial Academy (MNMA)-Zanzibar P.O Box 307 Zanzibar, Tanzania Abstract: The study assessed the management of protected areas in Serengeti ecosystem using the case of IGGRs. Specifically, the study aimed at identifying the strategies used for natural resources management; examining the impacts of those strategies; examining the hindrances of the identified strategies; and lastly, examining the methods for scaling up the performance of strategies used for natural resources in the study area. The study involved two villages among 31 villages bordering IGGRs where in each village; at least 5% of the households were sampled. Both Primary data and secondary data were collected and analyzed both manually and computer by using SPSS software. The study revealed that, study population ranked IGGRs performance on protection of natural resources, especially on conserving wildlife for future generation and in reducing poaching to be good(53.3%). In addition, the relationship with IGGRs was said to be considerable good (46.7%). In the aspect of reducing poaching, the findings show that poaching has been reduced by 96.2% from 2009 to 2012. Furthermore, 81.4% of respondents said they use different strategies to control loss of natural resources which in turn has considerably improved the relationship between protected areas and the surrounding communities in some of the aspects. -
Tanzania National Giraffe Conservation Action Plan (2020
National Giraffe Conservation Plan (2020-2024) National Giraffe Conservation Action Plan 2020 2024 III National Giraffe Conservation Plan (2020-2024) iii National Giraffe Conservation Plan (2020-2024) National Giraffe Conservation Plan (2020-2024) NATIONAL GIRAFFE CONSERVATION ACTION ________________________________________________________________________________ PLAN (2020 - 2024) Editors Julius Keyyu Alex Kisingo Edward Kohi Wilfred Marealle Emmanuel Lyimo Arthur Muneza Julian Fennessy Design and layout Jerome Kimaro Published by The Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute (TAWIRI) P.O Box 661 Arusha TANZANIA ©TAWIRI, 2019 ISBN: 978-9976-5380-0-7 Reproduction of this document for educational, conservation and other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this document for sale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. E. Kohi, 2020 iv v National Giraffe Conservation Plan (2020-2024) National Giraffe Conservation Plan (2020-2024) COOPERATION AND COLLABORATION FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE PLAN Statement of Endorsement The development of this action plan was a product of thorough planning, hard work and collaboration between government and nongovernmental partners. The following partner institutions supported and collaborated with TAWIRI for the successful development of this plan: I hereby endorse this management plan and call upon all stakeholders to support its implementation. ________________________________________ Dr Hamisi Kigwangalla (MP) MINISTER FOR NATURAL RESOURCES AND TOURISM Date 4th December 2019 vi vii National Giraffe Conservation Plan (2020-2024) National Giraffe Conservation Plan (2020-2024) Acknowledgements Forward Preparation of this document was made possible by extensive This Giraffe ConservationAction Plan (2020-2024) is designed to guide the support from the Government of the United Republic of implementation of local and national activities to conserve giraffe in Tanzania. -
Singita-Grumeti Big Mammal Day FOLEY 2
Setting a new 24-hour Big Mammal Day World Record in the Singita Grumeti area By Charles Foley, with Lara Foley and Brenden Simonson In September of this year we approached the management at Singita Grumeti in the Serengeti ecosystem with an unusual request: would they be interested in supporting an attempt to break the Big Mammal Day world record in their concession area? The Big Mammal Day concept stemmed from the much more common Big Birding Day where birding enthusiasts attempt to see as many different species of bird as possible in a 24-hour period – usually midnight to midnight. Certain rules apply; for instance, the participants have to find the animals themselves without outside assistance, the animals must be wild, and they cannot be trapped. My wife, Lara, and I had set the original Big Mammal Day record of 42 species in 2004, covering parts of the Ngorongoro Conservation Area and southern Serengeti National Park (a report of which was published in Birding Magazine in 2005). Since then several other groups have attempted Big Mammal Days, and the record was matched in a remarkable effort in California a few years ago. This got us wondering - would it be possible to see as many as 50 species in a single 24-hour period? To reach 50 species, a site would have to be carefully selected and would require the following features: 1) it would have to be in the tropics, in an area with high mammal species diversity, 2) it would have to be a savanna ecosystem where mammals are relatively easy to see, 3) night driving should be legal, as almost 70% of mammal species are either nocturnal or crepuscular, 4) there would have to be strong local knowledge that one could tap into during the reconnaissance phase, and 5) the area would need to have lots of species of bats.