DOCSLIB.ORG

Late Antique Or Early Medieval?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Late Antique Or Early Medieval? CHAPTER 2 Stone Cists: Late Antique or Early Medieval? There is no uniform or standard type of Old Croatian Stone cists are common during the second (or middle) grave or grave architecture. However, the links to the late horizon, especially in cemeteries between the Zrmanja antique burial rites and grave architecture are at best and the Trebišnjica.14 The younger part of the Stranče- tenuous.1 A number of authors have claimed that the sup- Gorica cemetery near Crikvenica includes plain inhuma- posed adoption of the late antique burial practices took tion pits, but blocks of roughly hewn stone have also been place in the late 8th or early 9th century,2 an opinion found in some graves, often around the pit. No true cist rejected by others who insisted on cultural discontinuity. 3 is known, however, from that cemetery. Plain inhumation Janko Belošević,4 on the other hand, believed that the pits are also known from Lika,15 Gomjenica near Prijedor, burial customs documented in 8th- and 9th-century cem- Junuzovci, Mahovljani, Petoševci, and Mihaljevići.16 eteries in Croatia were no different from those in the rest Stone-lined graves of rectangular (and not oval) shape of the “Slavic world.” To be sure, Belošević’s plain inhuma- appear in Istria, for example at Žminj.17 To date, the area tions, some in stone-lined pits, have many analogies dated between the Zrmanja and the Trebišnjica has the majority no later than the mid-9th century in the cemeteries of the of available on stone cists. In his study of the Mravince Sopronkőhida-Pitten-Pottenbrunn group in northwestern cemetery, Ljubo Karaman believed that plain inhumation Hungary and in Austria.5 Stone cists appear only occa- pits were the earliest form of grave employed by the early sionally at Kašić-Razbojine,6 Smilčić-Kulica, Medviđa, medieval Croats, who then adopted stone cists only after Stankovci,7 Velim,8 in the hinterland of Zadar,9 and at their conversion to Christianity around AD 800.18 Karaman Dubravice.10 Such cists appear in relatively larger num- believed that only analogies from within the Slavic world bers in valley of the Cetina river,11 but also at Mogorjelo were relevant for understanding early medieval forms of (Bosnia and Hercegovina) along the eastern rampart of graves in Croatia.19 the fort.12 The inspiration for such cists may have derived Š. Batović and O. Oštrić20 treated such forms of from graves with timber coffins, such as found in south- graves as an Illyrian (prehistoric) legacy. They pointed to western Slovakia during the Late Avar period.13 Mihaljevići and Nin–Ždrijac as examples of continuity from the ancient times. However, judging from the avail- able publication,21 in Mihaljevići there are clearly two distinct phases, with several grave superpositions, and 1 Batović-Oštrić 1969, 256. 2 Batović-Oštrić 1969, 255–259; Jelovina 1976, 76, 148; Belošević very different grave goods. Those were in fact two differ- 1980, 72, 133. ent cemeteries dated at a great distance in time from each 3 Čović 1969, 288, 299. other. The only thing they have in common is the loca- 4 Belošević 1980, 77. tion. In Nin–Ždrijac, there are Liburnian graves in square 5 Justová 1990, 224. stone cists underneath the westernmost section of the 6 Jelovina 1968a, 51. early medieval cemetery. They have been dated between 7 Belošević 1980, tab. XXXVII. the 9th and the 3rd century BC.22 The chronological gap 8 Jurić 2004a; Mezić 2004. between the first and the second cemetery is therefore 9 Jelovina (1976, 150) and Belošević (1980, 52, 74) wrongly date the graves in the environs of Zadar to the middle and second half considerable—more than a millennium. Continuity can of the 8th century. While stone-lined graves do indeed appear hardly be assumed under such circumstances. Nor can the in the “classical” Old Croatian horizon, they are restricted to the area east of the Neretva and up to the Župa. The end of that horizon around the middle of the 9th century coincides in 14 Sokol 1980a, 274; Sokol 1997a. time with cultural changes taking place in Moravia and west- 15 Ercegović 1960, 246. ern Slovakia (Budinský-Krička 1959, 35; Dostál 1966, 62, 68, 75, 16 Miletić 1989. 89–90; Marešová 1983, 116, 134; Hanuliak 2005, 30, 240), as well as 17 Marušić 1987a, 62–65. in northwestern Hungary (Justová 1990, 224). 18 Karaman 1940, 25–28 and 30. 10 Z. Gunjača 1995, 160. 19 Karaman 1940, 119. 11 Milošević 1990, 331. 20 Batović-Oštrić 1969, 256. 12 Čremošnik 1951b, 242. 21 Miletić 1956. 13 Točík 1968. 22 Batović 1970, 43; Belošević 1980, 25, tab. IV., pic. 1 and 2. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���6 | doi ��.��63/9789004306745_0�0 Stone Cists: Late Antique or Early Medieval? 127 western orientation of graves be taken as an indication of Jelovina28 similarly believed that the grave architecture in continuity from Late Antiquity to the early Middle Ages, the region pointed to a “a semi-Romanized local Illyrian since such an orientation appears in many areas of early population.” His claims of continuity from Late Antiquity medieval Europe with no funerary traditions going back to the early Middle Ages are primarily based on the evi- to late antique practices. dence from three cemeteries, two of which have remained The survival of a native population in Dalmatia and unpublished to this day—Bijaći-St Martha, Danilo- the pre-Alpine region during between the late fifth and Šematorij, and Bribir-Vratnice.29 According to Jelovina, in the early seventh century has been postulated by Zdenko Danilo-Šematorij, 32 out of 403 excavated graves are of a Vinski.23 Vinski believed that the chronology of such late antique date, while only 5 out of 128 graves in Bribir- typical artifacts as bow fibulae, fibulae with bent stem, Vratnice cemetery have been dated to Late Antiquity. disc-shaped fibulae, various types of buckles and beads, Only in Bijaći-St. Martha is the percentage higher, namely and bracelets with animal-shaped heads strongly sup- 15 out of 28 newly discovered graves. Needless to say, that ported the idea of a contact between the native popu- late antique and medieval graves are found within one lation and the early Slavs. He was convinced therefore and the same cemetery site is no indication of continu- that early medieval cemeteries in Croatia reflected “the ity. Such a situation may be easily be explained in terms late antique tradition, especially in view of jewelry and of two burial phases (i.e., two separate cemeter, unless grave architecture”.24 But Janko Belošević’s dissertation the archaeological material bespeaks a gradual transition (of which Zdenko Vinski was the supervisor) later showed from the earliest to the latest burial assemblages. Out of that Vinski’s native material of late antique date is absent the five late antique graves in Bribir–Vratnice, one was from sites with early medieval cemeteries. The latter rep- a plain inhumation pit, while the others were pits lined resent therefore something completely new, linked to the with bricks or regularly hewn stones bonded with mor- Frankish world to the north, and not to the late antique tar.30 From the evidence published so far, it appears that traditions of the Mediterranean south. some of the early medieval graves lie on top of the late Branko Marušić25 has drawn the scholarly attention to antique ones burials.31 Nor is there any indication of an stone-lined inhumation pits in “barbarized cemeteries” in early medieval grave in a plain inhumation pit or in a pit Istria, which are dated to the 7th and 8th century. He has lined with brick or stones bonded with mortar (such as also pointed to the existence of stone cists in the 9th- and typical for the late antique burials). 10th-century cemeteries of Buzet and Rižana. He believed Moreover, according to Dušan Jelovina,32 the late that that grave architecture originated in the “Bronze Age antique graves in Danilo and Bijaći have been found and the hill-fort cultures.” However, if rectangular stone underneath the early medieval ones, much like in cists were the predominant type of grave architecture Mihaljevići. In Bijaći-St Martha, the late antique graves among Croats in Istria,26 and illustrated in such cem- are over 1 m underneath the early medieval graves (which eteries as Žminj and Buje, then that cannot be a legacy have, therefore, not disturbed them). Despite claims to of the “Bronze Age culture,” because in the latter, grave the contrary,33 the architecture of the late antique graves pits are fashioned out of “stones.” It is important to note is different from that of the early medieval graves. that rectangular stone cists co-existed with timber cof- A considerable chronological gap has also been initially fins, the latter being completely absent from any earlier advanced for the late antique and early medieval burial cemeteries. In his book on the early medieval cemeter- phases in Lučane near Sinj,34 even though the excavator of ies between the Zrmanja and the Cetina rivers,27 Dušan that site has meanwhile changed his opinion on matters of continuity.35 According to Jelovina, despite assumed continuity between Late Antiquity and the early Middle Ages, no graves of the pagan (or first) horizon have been 23 Vinski 1971. 24 Vinski 1971, 60–61. 25 Marušić 1987a, 100. 28 Jelovina 1976, 76–77, 80, 148, 151. 26 Marušić 1987a, 98. 29 Jelovina 1976, 76; only published in 1992a. 27 It has become fashionable with many authors to limit their 30 Vrsalović 1968a; Jelovina 1992a. research to the area between those two rivers, although no 31 Vrsalović 1968a, tab.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Symbols of Power in Ireland and Scotland, 8Th-10Th Century Dr
    Symbols of power in Ireland and Scotland, 8th-10th century Dr. Katherine Forsyth (Department of Celtic, University of Glasgow, Scotland) Prof. Stephen T. Driscoll (Department of Archaeology, University of Glasgow, Scotland) d Territorio, Sociedad y Poder, Anejo Nº 2, 2009 [pp. 31-66] TSP Anexto 4.indb 31 15/11/09 17:22:04 Resumen: Este artículo investiga algunos de los símbolos utilizaron las cruces de piedra en su inserción espacial como del poder utilizados por las autoridades reales en Escocia signos de poder. La segunda parte del trabajo analiza más e Irlanda a lo largo de los siglos viii al x. La primera parte ampliamente los aspectos visibles del poder y la naturaleza del trabajo se centra en las cruces de piedra, tanto las cruces de las sedes reales en Escocia e Irlanda. Los ejemplos exentas (las high crosses) del mundo gaélico de Irlanda estudiados son la sede de la alta realeza irlandesa en Tara y y la Escocia occidental, como las lastras rectangulares la residencia regia gaélica de Dunnadd en Argyll. El trabajo con cruz de la tierra de los pictos. El monasterio de concluye volviendo al punto de partida con el examen del Clonmacnoise ofrece un ejemplo muy bien documentado centro regio picto de Forteviot. de patronazgo regio, al contrario que el ejemplo escocés de Portmahomack, carente de base documental histórica, Palabras clave: pictos, gaélicos, escultura, Clonmacnoise, pero en ambos casos es posible examinar cómo los reyes Portmahomack, Tara, Dunnadd, Forteviot. Abstract: This paper explores some of the symbols of power landscape context as an expression of power.
    [Show full text]
  • Medieval Mediterranean Influence in the Treasury of San Marco Claire
    Circular Inspirations: Medieval Mediterranean Influence in the Treasury of San Marco Claire Rasmussen Thesis Submitted to the Department of Art For the Degree of Bachelor of Arts 2019 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER I. Introduction………………………...………………………………………….3 II. Myths……………………………………………………………………….....9 a. Historical Myths…………………………………………………………...9 b. Treasury Myths…………………………………………………………..28 III. Mediums and Materials………………………………………………………34 IV. Mergings……………………………………………………………………..38 a. Shared Taste……………………………………………………………...40 i. Global Networks…………………………………………………40 ii. Byzantine Influence……………………………………………...55 b. Unique Taste……………………………………………………………..60 V. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………...68 VI. Appendix………………………………………………………………….….73 VII. List of Figures………………………………………………………………..93 VIII. Works Cited…………………………………………………...……………104 3 I. Introduction In the Treasury of San Marco, there is an object of three parts (Figure 1). Its largest section piece of transparent crystal, carved into the shape of a grotto. Inside this temple is a metal figurine of Mary, her hands outstretched. At the bottom, the crystal grotto is fixed to a Byzantine crown decorated with enamels. Each part originated from a dramatically different time and place. The crystal was either carved in Imperial Rome prior to the fourth century or in 9th or 10th century Cairo at the time of the Fatimid dynasty. The figure of Mary is from thirteenth century Venice, and the votive crown is Byzantine, made by craftsmen in the 8th or 9th century. The object resembles a Frankenstein’s monster of a sculpture, an amalgamation of pieces fused together that were meant to used apart. But to call it a Frankenstein would be to suggest that the object’s parts are wildly mismatched and clumsily sewn together, and is to dismiss the beauty of the crystal grotto, for each of its individual components is finely made: the crystal is intricately carved, the figure of Mary elegant, and the crown vivid and colorful.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between King Alfred the Great and Ceolwulf II of Mercia (874-C.879)
    Penn History Review Volume 26 Issue 2 Article 2 February 2020 The Relationship between King Alfred the Great and Ceolwulf II of Mercia (874-c.879) Brent Weisberg University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/phr Recommended Citation Weisberg, Brent (2020) "The Relationship between King Alfred the Great and Ceolwulf II of Mercia (874-c.879)," Penn History Review: Vol. 26 : Iss. 2 , Article 2. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/phr/vol26/iss2/2 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/phr/vol26/iss2/2 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Alfred the Great and Ceolwulf II The Relationship between King Alfred the Great and Ceolwulf II of Mercia (874-c.879) Brent Weisberg, University of Pennsylvania Introduction Studying King Ceolwulf II of Mercia presents one with a situation not unlike the one former US Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld’s described concerning American intelligence work in Iraq in 2002: "there are known knowns… there are known unknowns… but there are also unknown unknowns."1 The "known knowns" of Ceolwulf’s reign are few and far between. All we have to bear witness to the life and legacy of Ceolwulf, the last independent ruler of Mercia, are two charters of his, a few mentions in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle as well as two of its likely derivatives, and several dozen coins.2 The few coins we have, particularly examples of Two Emperors type coins from the recent Watlington hoard find, provide material evidence of Ceolwulf’s reign that may be used to corroborate or contravene literary evidence.3 I shall seek to elucidate the history of Ceolwulf that I discern to be most plausible through the lens of his relationships with King Alfred of Wessex and the Vikings.
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Operation Between the Viking Rus' and the Turkic Nomads of The
    Csete Katona Co-operation between the Viking Rus’ and the Turkic nomads of the steppe in the ninth-eleventh centuries MA Thesis in Medieval Studies Central European University Budapest May 2018 CEU eTD Collection Co-operation between the Viking Rus’ and the Turkic nomads of the steppe in the ninth-eleventh centuries by Csete Katona (Hungary) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Medieval Studies. Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU. ____________________________________________ Chair, Examination Committee ____________________________________________ Thesis Supervisor ____________________________________________ Examiner ____________________________________________ Examiner CEU eTD Collection Budapest May 2018 Co-operation between the Viking Rus’ and the Turkic nomads of the steppe in the ninth-eleventh centuries by Csete Katona (Hungary) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Medieval Studies. Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU. ____________________________________________ External Reader CEU eTD Collection Budapest May 2018 Co-operation between the Viking Rus’ and the Turkic nomads of the steppe in the ninth-eleventh centuries by Csete Katona (Hungary) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Medieval Studies. Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU. ____________________________________________ External Supervisor CEU eTD Collection Budapest May 2018 I, the undersigned, Csete Katona, candidate for the MA degree in Medieval Studies, declare herewith that the present thesis is exclusively my own work, based on my research and only such external information as properly credited in notes and bibliography.
    [Show full text]
  • Viking Age Arms and Armor Originating in the Frankish Kingdom
    The Hilltop Review Volume 4 Issue 2 Spring Article 8 April 2011 Viking Age Arms and Armor Originating in the Frankish Kingdom Valerie Dawn Hampton Western Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/hilltopreview Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Hampton, Valerie Dawn (2011) "Viking Age Arms and Armor Originating in the Frankish Kingdom," The Hilltop Review: Vol. 4 : Iss. 2 , Article 8. Available at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/hilltopreview/vol4/iss2/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Hilltop Review by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact wmu- [email protected]. 36 VIKING AGE ARMS AND ARMOR ORIGNINATING IN THE FRANKISH KINGDOM By Valerie Dawn Hampton Department of History [email protected] The export of Carolingian arms and armor to Northern regions outside the Frankish Empire from the 9th and early 10th century is a subject which has seen a gradual increase of interest among archaeologists and historians alike. Recent research has shown that the Vikings of this period bore Frankish arms, particularly swords, received either through trade or by spolia that is plunder.1 In the examination of material remains, illustrations, and capitularies, the rea- son why Carolingian arms and armor were prized amongst the Viking nations can be ascertained and evidence found as to how the Vikings came to possess such valued items. The material remains come from a variety of archaeological sites, which have yielded arms and sometimes even well preserved armor.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology Activity Sheet
    What Is Chronology Chronology? The skill of putting events into time order is called chronology. History is measured from the first recorded written word about 6,000 years ago and so historians need to have an easy way to place events into order. Anything that happened prior to written records is called ‘prehistory’. To place events into chronological order means to put them in the order in which they happened, with the earliest event at the start and the latest (or most recent) event at the end. Put these events into chronological order from your morning Travelled to school Cleaned teeth 1. 2. 3. 4. Got dressed Woke up 5. 6. Had breakfast Washed my face How do we measure time? There are many ways historians measure time and there are special terms for it. Match up the correct chronological term and what it means. week 1000 years year 10 years decade 365 days century 7 days millennium 100 years What do BC and AD mean? When historians look at time, the centuries are divided between BC and AD. They are separated by the year 0, which is when Jesus Christ was born. Anything that happened before the year 0 is classed as BC (Before Christ) and anything that happened after is classed as AD (Anno Domini – In the year of our Lord). This means we are in the year 2020 AD. BC is also known as BCE and AD as CE. BCE means Before Common Era and CE means Common Era. They are separated by the year 0 just like BC and AD, but are a less religious alternative.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago, Newberry Library, Masi Fragm. 14 and the Fate of the Theodulf Bible in the Long Ninth Century
    Quærendo 49 (2019) 119-134 brill.com/qua Chicago, Newberry Library, Masi Fragm. 14 and the Fate of the Theodulf Bible in the Long Ninth Century Evina Steinova Postdoctoral Researcher, Huygens ING, KNAW, The Netherlands [email protected] Abstract Manuscript fragment Chicago, Newberry Library, Masi Fragm. 14 was previously mis- identified as containing an unknown sermon or biblical excerpts. It is, in fact, a rem- nant of large-format deluxe Bible containing a set of Spanish prefaces to the Pauline epistles. These prefaces identify the deluxe codex as a descendant of a Theodulf Bible, a scholarly revision of the biblical text produced in the first decades of the ninth century by Theodulf of Orleans. Only seven copies of the Theodulf Bible are known. It is thus relevant that the Newberry fragment may have been dependent on another, previously unknown copy that was kept in one of the large monasteries of northwest- ern France, from which the fragment most probably comes. Because of its provenance from Haspres, the deluxe manuscript may have been produced in the nearby abbey of St. Vaast in Arras or perhaps by the community of the abbey of Jumièges. Keywords early medieval manuscript fragments – Theodulf Bible – Bible in the early Middle Ages – Carolingian manuscripts According to the Codices Latini Antiquiores and Bernhard Bischoff’s Katalog der festländischen Handschriften,1 the Newberry Library in Chicago owns sixteen 1 I would like to thank Rosamond McKitterick for her precious comments and corrections. © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2019 | doi:10.1163/15700690-12341435 120 Steinova manuscript fragments that can be dated to before the year 900.2 These frag- ments were cataloged for the first time in 1972 by Michael Masi, who assigned them their present shelf-marks and provided them with a short description and a tentative date.3 Masi identified one of these fragments, his number 14, as containing an unidentified sermon copied in the ninth century.
    [Show full text]
  • The Viking Expeditions to Spain During the 9Th Century
    TH THE VIKING EXPEDITIONS TO SPAIN DURING THE 9 CENTURY by Víctor Emanuel Aguirre Odense, Centre for Medieval Studies 2013 CONTENT 2 MAPS 3 4 THE VIKING EXPEDITIONS TO SPAIN DURING THE 9TH CENTURY The Sources This article in two parts aims at making the Scandinavian readers a bit more familiar with a topic that has barely been approached by scholars, neither in the north nor in the south. The target of this first part is to contribute to the Nordic historiography with a series of texts that prove useful to track down the movements of the Vikings1 along the coasts of the Iberian Peninsula during the 9th century. The importance of these reports lays in the fact that there is no alternative way of knowing of such events – rather isolated, yet important – that have taken place during the Spanish and Scandinavian Middle Ages. There is no archaeological evidence, and the chances to relay on the study of old place names are very reduced and isolated2. Given the consequent importance of chronicles, our efforts should not be merely placed on transcribing them and describing the historical context in which they were created, but we should focus on assessing how useful they are as tools to reconstruct a historical era. Scandinavian historians and experts in Viking history are all likely to be familiar with the Annales Bertiniani, which represent an important source for studying the movements of the Nordic pirates in France. They will however find other Hispanic – and even Arab and Latin – source more obscure, as their contributions to the study of the Vikings has been much less 1 *I would like to dedicate this article to Karen Fog Rasmussen, to show my gratitude for her help, kindness and patience.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Paolo Merlo 1. Introduction the Corpus of Ancient Aramaic
    CHAPTER FIVE LITERATURE Paolo Merlo 1. Introduction The corpus of ancient Aramaic texts is rather limited and cannot be com- pared with other Ancient Near Eastern examples, such as the Akkadian or Egyptian ones. Strictly speaking, no literary work has yet come to light within the corpus of Old Aramaic inscriptions from Syria except for the poorly preserved and fragmented inscription from Tell Deir ʿAlla. It is nevertheless possible to discover some literary features in Old Aramaic inscriptions of other genres, such as royal inscriptions, stelae, letters, or international treaties. In this chapter some literary aspects and stylistic devices of these ancient Aramaic texts shall be reviewed. 2. Terminology “Old Aramaic” usually refers to the earliest phase of the Aramaic lan- guage.1 The texts pertaining to this period date from the origin of the language in the 9th century B.C. to the rise of the Babylonian empire in the 6th century B.C. While the starting date is self-evident (it marks the earliest possible evidence of Aramaic), some problems arise when deter- mining the lower chronological limit. Some scholars set the beginning of “Official Aramaic” with the spread of the Assyrian empire around 700 B.C. (J.A. Fitzmyer), others place the lower limit of the Old Aramaic language at the collapse of the Assyrian Empire (St. A. Kaufman), and still others consider the texts from the Neo-Assyrian and Neo-Babylonian period to be a new phase of Old Aramaic (V. Hug). The scholars following the latter theory divide the Old Aramaic corpus into two main groups: the earlier Old Aramaic inscriptions (i.e., the texts of the independent Aramaean cities), and the later Old Aramaic inscriptions (i.e., the texts produced 1 For more details, cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Political History from 6Th Century A. D. to 9Th Century A. D. the Territories
    C H A P T E R II Political History from 6th Century A. D. to 9th Century A. D. The territories of early Bengal became an integral part of the Gupta empire. But it would not be proper to say that the people of Bengal submitted to the mighty Gupta emperors rather meekly. At least, we have one instance to show that the people of Bengal rose like one man and gave stiff resistence to the invading forces under King Chandra, though ultimately they were beaten. In view of the inevitable chaos that followed the dismemberment of the Gupta empire, the people of Bengal for the first time emerged into the limelight of political history of India and curved out independent principalities. The downfall of the Guptas marked the breaking up of northern India into a number of small states. Saurast­ racame under the domination of the Haitrakas of Valavi. Thane§_vara was taken over by the Pushyabhut is, while the Haukhauris held sway in Kanauj. y£sodharman, a military adventurer, attempted to set up an ephemeral empire in central India, Rajputana and other parts of the Punjab 1• 17 Magadha and Mal wa pas sed under the sway of the Later Guptas who ~ay have been an offshoot of the Imperial Guptas, but as yet we have no positive evidence in support of this view. Bengal also took advantage of the political situation tc shake off the foreign yoke and two powerful independent Kingdoms, viz. Vanga and Gauda were established there in the siXth and seventh • 2 Century A.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade and Exchange in Anglo-Saxon Wessex, C Ad 600–780
    Medieval Archaeology, 60/1, 2016 Trade and Exchange in Anglo-Saxon Wessex, c ad 600–780 By MICHAEL D COSTEN1 and NICHOLAS P COSTEN2 THIS PAPER ASSESSES the provenance and general distribution of coins of the period c ad 600–780 found in the west of Anglo-Saxon Wessex. It shows that the distribution of coin finds is not a function of the habits of metal detectorists, but a reflection of the real pattern of losses. In the second part of the paper, an analysis of the observed distributions is presented which reveals that the bulk of trade, of which the coins are a sign, was carried on through local ports and that foreign trade was not mediated through Hamwic, but came directly from the Continent. The distribution of coin finds also suggests an important export trade, probably in wool and woollen goods, controlled from major local centres. There are also hints of a potentially older trade system in which hillforts and other open sites were important. INTRODUCTION Discussion of trade and exchange in the middle Anglo-Saxon period has reached an advanced stage, and the progress in understanding the possible reach and consequences of recent discoveries has transformed our view of Anglo-Saxon society in the period ad 600–800. Most of the research has focused upon the eastern side of Britain, in particular upon discoveries in East Anglia, Lincolnshire and the south-east. The stage was really set in 1982 when Richard Hodges put forward his model of the growth of exchange and trade among the emerging 7th-century Anglo-Saxon kingdoms; he developed the thesis that the trade which took place was concentrated in particular localities which he labelled ‘emporia’.3 It seemed that there might be one of these central places for each of the newly forming Anglo-Saxon kingdoms, or at least the dominant ones.
    [Show full text]
  • Introductions to Heritage Assets: Ships and Boats: Prehistory to 1840
    Ships and Boats: Prehistory to 1840 Introductions to Heritage Assets Summary Historic England’s Introductions to Heritage Assets (IHAs) are accessible, authoritative, illustrated summaries of what we know about specific types of archaeological site, building, landscape or marine asset. Typically they deal with subjects which lack such a summary. This can either be where the literature is dauntingly voluminous, or alternatively where little has been written. Most often it is the latter, and many IHAs bring understanding of site or building types which are neglected or little understood. Many of these are what might be thought of as ‘new heritage’, that is they date from after the Second World War. Principally from the archaeological evidence, this overview identifies and describes pre-Industrial vessels (that is from the earliest times to about 1840) used on inland and coastal waters and the open sea, as well as ones abandoned in coastal areas. It includes vessels buried through reclamation or some other process: many of the most significant early boats and ships have been discovered on land rather than at sea. Vessels and wrecks pre-dating 1840 are relatively rare: the latter comprise just 4 per cent of known sites around the English coast. This guidance note has been written by Mark Dunkley and edited by Paul Stamper. It is one is of several guidance documents that can be accessed at HistoricEngland.org.uk/listing/selection-criteria/listing-selection/ihas-buildings/ First published by English Heritage March 2012. This edition published by Historic England July 2016. All images © Historic England unless otherwise stated.
    [Show full text]