Core 1..192 Hansard

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Core 1..192 Hansard House of Commons Debates VOLUME 147 Ï NUMBER 027 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 41st PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, November 29, 2013 Speaker: The Honourable Andrew Scheer CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 1539 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, November 29, 2013 The House met at 10 a.m. hundreds of pages that affected thousands of our laws totally unrelated to the budget. We had to deal with those. They were shoved down our throats. We tried to divide the bills into different parts, so they could be studied in the appropriate committees, but we Prayers did not succeed. As an example, one of the budget bills contained a measure, GOVERNMENT ORDERS introduced by the Conservatives, providing for the removal of protections for lakes and rivers in Canada. Ï (1005) [Translation] Someone on the other side of the House will have to explain to me PROTECTING CANADIANS FROM ONLINE CRIME ACT how removing the protections for our lakes and rivers relates to the budget. We tried to divide this section of the bill to send it to the The House resumed from November 28 consideration of the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development, motion that Bill C-13, An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the where it should have been studied. Unfortunately, the Conservatives Canada Evidence Act, the Competition Act and the Mutual Legal refused. Assistance in Criminal Matters Act, be read the second time and referred to a committee. Every time we have tried to introduce amendments to omnibus Ms. Rosane Doré Lefebvre (Alfred-Pellan, NDP): Mr. Speaker, bills or divide them by seeking the unanimous consent of the House, I am pleased to rise to speak to Bill C-13 today, November 29. the Conservatives have flatly refused. There are various reasons why it is important that we sit here today and discuss Bill C-13. The most important reason is the I am extremely disappointed that Bill C-13 does not go deeper into respect that we all have for the fight against bullying, especially cyberbullying, which is a sensitive issue that requires so much bullying directed at our youth. attention. It does not just affect young people, as we have seen in the high-profile media stories in recent years. Cyberbullying affects a No one in the House is against virtue or the idea that we must large segment of the population. I will come back to this later in my identify all the means and tools that could be used in the fight against speech. cyberbullying. I will be using my 20 minutes to talk about cyberbullying It is extremely disappointing to see the Conservatives playing specifically. That is what the title of the bill makes us think it is cheap political games in the House with legislation that should be about. However, Bill C-13 unfortunately covers more than just passed unanimously. They are trying to add items and make us say cyberbullying. It talks about numerous other ways and means to yes to things that are in no way related to cyberbullying. It is address a number of aspects of online crime, in addition to other incredibly disappointing to see the other side of the House engaging things that have nothing to do with cyberbullying. in petty politics. Allow me to explain. If members take the time to really read what In Bill C-13, the part on cyberbullying is a pretty close copy of is in Bill C-13, they will see that the section on bullying is only two what my colleague from Dartmouth—Cole Harbour introduced last pages long. This bill is more than 50 pages long, and it is clear upon June. That was a private member's bill, and everyone agreed with the reading it that it is yet another Conservative omnibus bill. principle of the bill. However, instead of examining it together and passing it quickly, the Conservatives decided to take part of what my I will not hide my disappointment today at having to rise to speak colleague was proposing in Bill C-540 and add it to Bill C-13, along once again to an omnibus bill. This is unfortunately not the first time with some other elements. one has been introduced in the House. We have had several omnibus bills in the past two parliaments—indeed, since this government won a majority. This is a sorry state of affairs, for many reasons. Instead of concentrating on a bill on cyberbullying that was properly divided, the Conservatives opened up the floodgates and The latest budget bills introduced by the Conservatives are added some other things. They have made Bill C-13 into quite the examples of such omnibus legislation. We had bills comprising concoction. 1540 COMMONS DEBATES November 29, 2013 Government Orders I also wanted to talk about another bill today. A few months ago, problem. We can then come back to the rest of the bill the my colleague from Chicoutimi—Le Fjord moved a very interesting government has handed us—a rehash of the former Bill C-30— motion on cyberbullying. I cannot elaborate on it too much, because which addresses the completely different topic of privacy. the motion had to do with more than just cyberbullying. However, I know my colleague from Chicoutimi—Le Fjord worked very hard on that motion. Almost all experts and public interest groups agreed that it was a very important motion. Unfortunately, the only party Let us focus on the two pages on cyberbullying out of the 50-some that voted against the motion was the Conservative Party. It is so sad pages in Bill C-13. Let us pass these measures so that the authorities that the Conservatives are refusing to discuss the private member's can make use of them as quickly as possible. That is how we can bill introduced by the hon. member for Dartmouth—Cole Harbour, combat cyberbullying together. which focused solely on cyberbullying, and that they so easily dismissed the idea of debating and adopting the motion moved by my colleague from Chicoutimi—Le Fjord. Cyberbullying boggles my mind. Honestly, it is so sad. No one Before I talk about privacy in more detail, I want to say that Laval can claim they have never encountered bullying. It is impossible. does a lot of good things and I like to brag about them. A Laval When I was attending Horizon Jeunesse secondary school in Laval, organization called Volteface has found a unique way to address we had pagers. Cellphones did not exist yet. I am lucky because I bullying and especially cyberbullying in Quebec. I cannot speak for was never bullied in high school. I was more of a social butterfly. I the other provinces, regions or territories in Canada, but this is the had all sorts of friends. I was never directly affected by bullying at only program of its kind in Quebec. Volteface is an alternative justice school. However, I have friends who were bullied at school. It is organization that finds ways to help build harmonious relationships serious. My brother was bullied. He would often have his lunch by offering preventive activities and alternative conflict resolution stolen. He was embarrassed and did not want to talk about it with my mechanisms. It works with teenagers, victims, the general public, parents. Today, my brother is six feet tall and as strong as an ox, but, parents, schools and the community. unfortunately for him, that was not the case when he was in high school. He was very cute and very nice. Perhaps he was bullied because he was too cute and too nice. Those were the early days of the Internet. We did not have a Volteface created an innovative tool as part of its “Ultimatum < computer at home. We had to do our research on the computers at the Échap > LA CYBER INTIMIDATION” project. The organization is library. We could not afford a computer. We did not have to deal with actually based in Shawinigan, but it operates in Laval. It has cyberbullying, but bullying was all around me and part of my daily developed a partnership and focuses on high schools. The guide is life. I saw what an impact bullying could have. Unfortunately, some intended for high school students, their parents and school staff. It students who were bullied at Horizon Jeunesse committed suicide. offers information on how to prevent cyberbullying and talks about what kind of action is appropriate. This project focuses especially on Bullying at school is one thing, but when we are at home, we are youth and has been operating in Laval since Volteface created it. It is protected. We are in a bubble. However, cyberbullying follows us 24 a very worthwhile program. hours a day. We go home and use social media. Almost everyone has an iPhone or a BlackBerry in their pockets. We have access to Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn. We can access a host of social media very quickly. The impact is immediate and it follows us day They are targeting young people because a number of studies and night. There is no break from it. I cannot imagine what it must indicate that, although people of all ages can be affected by be like to be a victim of cyberbullying when there is no getting away cyberbullying, youth 12 to 14 are at greater risk. My daughter is from it. It is very serious. seven months old, and I am already worried about the tween years. I My colleague from Gatineau raised an extremely important point do not know what social media will be like then, but I say to myself this week.
Recommended publications
  • Core 1..196 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 14.50)
    House of Commons Debates VOLUME 146 Ï NUMBER 029 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 41st PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, October 7, 2011 Speaker: The Honourable Andrew Scheer CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 1993 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, October 7, 2011 The House met at 10 a.m. We must also build the jobs of the future. This means we must shift to a green economy to stimulate growth, create new jobs, eradicate poverty and limit humanity's ecological footprint. It is no longer a choice between saving our economy and saving the Prayers environment. It is a choice between being a producer and a consumer in the old economy and being a leader in a new economy. It is a choice between decline and prosperity. GOVERNMENT ORDERS Ï (1005) [English] The government should work in partnership with provinces, KEEPING CANADA'S ECONOMY AND JOBS GROWING territories, municipalities, labour organizations, industry sectors, first ACT nations and others to develop a national sustainable energy and The House resumed from October 6 consideration of the motion economic growth strategy to position Canada to succeed in the that Bill C-13, An Act to implement certain provisions of the 2011 global economy. It should develop a clean energy employment budget as updated on June 6, 2011 and other measures, be read the transition for Canada with goals for 2015, 2020, 2025 and 2030. second time and referred to a committee. This strategy should include skills development, training programs and certification courses. Ms. Kirsty Duncan (Etobicoke North, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I rise today to speak to Bill C-13.
    [Show full text]
  • Residents Stunned As Mardi Gras Cancelled
    August 2019 [email protected] No. 09 Buy local. Live local. Residents stunned as Mardi Gras cancelled Area residents are shocked “Last year the event was a huge suc- and disappointed by the cess and this year promises to be big- abrupt cancellation of a much- ger and better,” the organizers wrote anticipated annual Lake Shore before cancelling the festival. Mardi Gras festival that fea- They said more than 10,000 guests tured dozens of top rock, attended the event in 2018 to listen to blues and jazz bands and stars the bands, participate in the activities as Kim Mitchell, Rik Emmett, or just have fun at the fair. Officials COMMUNITY STUNNER! HUNDREDS OF TOP BANDS HAVE PERFORMED at the now gone 15th Annual Lake Chilliwack, 54-40 and others Shore Mardi Gras festival; including (from left) B.C.’s rockers 54-40, Rik Emmett, local bluesman Spider of the Lake Shore and Long Branch over the last 15-years. Jones and Green River Revival among the many others. Courtesy photos. BIA’s said they had heard of the can- The popular festival, which cellation of the event which drew th thousands of families and music fans last year celebrated its 15 an- was not involved. Members of the “We apologize for the late notice and niversary, was founded by Councillor to the area for the four-day festival.. committee did not return phone calls thank you for your past support.” “I went to the festival for the bands ev- Mark Grimes and attracted 10,000 or or leave an explanation to the commu- The organizers promised family activi- more fans to see some of the bands.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Bill C-24 – Strengthening Canadian Citizenship Act and Bill C-51 – Anti-Terrorism Act
    CONSTRUCTING CITIZENSHIP THROUGH NATIONAL SECURITY: AN ANALYSIS OF BILL C-24 – STRENGTHENING CANADIAN CITIZENSHIP ACT AND BILL C-51 – ANTI-TERRORISM ACT BRIANNA GARNEAU Thesis submitted to the University of Ottawa in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts. Department of Criminology Faculty of Social Sciences University of Ottawa © Brianna Garneau, Ottawa, Canada, 2018 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to give a special thank you to my supervisor Professor Baljit Nagra, whose encouragement, guidance and support assisted me in the makings and completion of this goal. I would also like to thank my examiners Professor Maritza Felices- Luna and Professor David Moffette for their invaluable feedback. Thank you all for supporting me, having faith in my abilities, and pushing me to reach my full potential throughout this entire process. An infinite love-filled thank you to my mother, Lyne. This thesis would not have been completed without you. Thank you for being my biggest cheerleader in my moments of doubt and for being alongside me every step of the way in every way you could. Thank you to my step-father, Tommy, my brother Dante, and my sisters Chloe and Charlee-Rose for always carrying light into my gloomy days. Thank you to my dearest friends Subhah and Tara for being my partners-in- crime throughout this Master’s program – it would have been a lonely experience without you and I am forever grateful to have had you experience this roller coaster with me. I love you all, thank you from the bottom of my heart.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..182 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 14.00)
    House of Commons Debates VOLUME 146 Ï NUMBER 044 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 41st PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, November 4, 2011 Speaker: The Honourable Andrew Scheer CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 2961 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, November 4, 2011 The House met at 10 a.m. Mr. Chris Alexander: Mr. Speaker, I rise again in support of the bill that addresses the urgent need to ensure the proper functioning of our military justice system. Prayers The bill comes to us in the context of two facts that I think all hon. members will recognize. One, a legal circumstance that places GOVERNMENT ORDERS additional pressure on all of us to ensure the smooth functioning of our military justice system, one that has served Canada well for Ï (1005) decades. We just celebrated the centenary of the Office of the Judge Advocate General without a challenge to its constitutionality. I will [English] come back to that issue and delve into the circumstances that have SECURITY OF TENURE OF MILITARY JUDGES ACT led to a danger of that happening. Hon. Bev Oda (for the Minister of National Defence) moved that Bill C-16, An Act to amend the National Defence Act (military judges), be read the second time and referred to a committee. This is a measure that has been considered in the House three times during three previous Parliament when bills were brought Mr. Chris Alexander (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister forward that provided for exactly the very limited measures that are of National Defence, CPC): Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Accession No. 1986/428
    -1- Liberal Party of Canada MG 28 IV 3 Finding Aid No. 655 ACCESSION NO. 1986/428 Box No. File Description Dates Research Bureau 1567 Liberal Caucus Research Bureau Briefing, Book - British Columbia, Vol. I July 1981 Liberal Caucus Research Bureau Briefing, Book - Saskatchewan, Vol. I and Sept. 1981 II Liberal Caucus Research Bureau Briefing, Book - Alberta, Vol. II May 20, 1981 1568 Liberal Caucus Research Bureau Briefing, Book - Manitoba, Vols. II and III 1981 Liberal caucus Research Bureau Briefing, Book - British Columbia, Vol. IV 1981 Elections & Executive Minutes 1569 Minutes of LPC National Executive Meetings Apr. 29, 1979 to Apr. 13, 1980 Poll by poll results of October 1978 By-Elections Candidates' Lists, General Elections May 22, 1979 and Feb. 18, 1980 Minutes of LPC National Executive Meetings June-Dec. 1981 1984 General Election: Positions on issues plus questions and answers (statements by John N. Turner, Leader). 1570 Women's Issues - 1979 General Election 1979 Nova Scotia Constituency Manual Mar. 1984 Analysis of Election Contribution - PEI & Quebec 1980 Liberal Government Anti-Inflation Controls and Post-Controls Anti-Inflation Program 2 LIBERAL PARTY OF CANADA MG 28, IV 3 Box No. File Description Dates Correspondence from Senator Al Graham, President of LPC to key Liberals 1978 - May 1979 LPC National Office Meetings Jan. 1976 to April 1977 1571 Liberal Party of Newfoundland and Labrador St. John's West (Nfld) Riding Profiles St. John's East (Nfld) Riding Profiles Burin St. George's (Nfld) Riding Profiles Humber Port-au-Port-St.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..146 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 8.00)
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 140 Ï NUMBER 098 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 38th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, May 13, 2005 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 5957 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, May 13, 2005 The House met at 10 a.m. Parliament on February 23, 2005, and Bill C-48, an act to authorize the Minister of Finance to make certain payments, shall be disposed of as follows: 1. Any division thereon requested before the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, shall be deferred to that time; Prayers 2. At the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, all questions necessary for the disposal of the second reading stage of (1) Bill C-43 and (2) Bill C-48 shall be put and decided forthwith and successively, Ï (1000) without further debate, amendment or deferral. [English] Ï (1010) MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE The Speaker: Does the hon. government House leader have the The Speaker: I have the honour to inform the House that a unanimous consent of the House for this motion? message has been received from the Senate informing this House Some hon. members: Agreed. that the Senate has passed certain bills, to which the concurrence of this House is desired. Some hon. members: No. Mr. Jay Hill (Prince George—Peace River, CPC): Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberals Lead in Etobicoke-Lakeshore
    MEDIA INQUIRIES: Lorne Bozinoff, President [email protected] 416.960.9603 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Liberals lead in Etobicoke-Lakeshore TORONTO th Bernard Trottier in second September 18 , 2015 HIGHLIGHTS: TORONTO September 18th, 2015 - In a random sampling of public opinion taken by the Forum Poll among 835 voters in the federal riding of Etobicoke-Lakeshore, more More than 4-in-10 will vote than 4-in-10 will vote for the Liberal candidate, James Maloney (41%) while one for the Liberal candidate, third will support the Conservative incumbent, Bernard Trottier (33%). One fifth will James Maloney (41%) while vote NDP, for Phil Trotter (22%) and few will vote Green (4%). The Conservative vote one third will support the is common to younger groups (35 to 44 - 41%) and mid income groups ($40K to Conservative incumbent, $60K - 48%). The Liberal vote is older (45 to 54 - 50%), female (44%) and wealthier Bernard Trottier (33%). ($100K to $250K - 52%). The NDP vote is common to the youngest (37%). “This has been a long-time “This has been a long-time Liberal riding, and it turned over to the Conservatives in Liberal riding, and it turned 2011 when the Liberal leader, Michael Ignatieff ran here. It appears that, now a less over to the Conservatives in vilified candidate is running, the riding is returning to its default red hue," said 2011 when the Liberal Forum Research President, Dr. Lorne Bozinoff. leader, Michael Ignatieff ran Lorne Bozinoff, Ph.D. is the president and founder of Forum Research. He can be here. It appears that, now a reached at [email protected] or at (416) 960-9603.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..31 Journalweekly (PRISM::Advent3b2 8.00)
    HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES DU CANADA 38th PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION 38e LÉGISLATURE, 1re SESSION Journals Journaux No. 134 No 134 Friday, October 7, 2005 Le vendredi 7 octobre 2005 10:00 a.m. 10 heures PRAYERS PRIÈRE GOVERNMENT ORDERS ORDRES ÉMANANT DU GOUVERNEMENT The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Mitchell La Chambre reprend l'étude de la motion de M. Mitchell (Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food), seconded by Mr. Brison (ministre de l'Agriculture et de l'Agroalimentaire), appuyé par M. (Minister of Public Works and Government Services), — That Bill Brison (ministre des Travaux publics et des Services S-38, An Act respecting the implementation of international trade gouvernementaux), — Que le projet de loi S-38, Loi concernant commitments by Canada regarding spirit drinks of foreign la mise en oeuvre d'engagements commerciaux internationaux pris countries, be now read a second time and referred to the par le Canada concernant des spiritueux provenant de pays Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food. étrangers, soit maintenant lu une deuxième fois et renvoyé au Comité permanent de l'agriculture et de l'agroalimentaire. The debate continued. Le débat se poursuit. The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to. La motion, mise aux voix, est agréée. Accordingly, Bill S-38, An Act respecting the implementation En conséquence, le projet de loi S-38, Loi concernant la mise en of international trade commitments by Canada regarding spirit oeuvre d'engagements commerciaux internationaux pris par le drinks of foreign countries, was read the second time and referred Canada concernant des spiritueux provenant de pays étrangers, est to the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliament of Canada / Parlement Du Canada
    PARLIAMENT OF CANADA / PARLEMENT DU CANADA The Dominion of Canada was created under the provisions of an Act of the Imperial Parliament (30 Victoria, Chapter III) passed in 1867, and formally cited as The British North America Act, 1867. This Act received Royal Assent, March 29th, 1867, and came into effect by virtue of Royal Proclamation, July 1st, 1867. The Constitution Act, 1867, provides: “There shall be one Parliament for Canada, consisting of the Queen, an Upper House styled the Senate, and the House of Commons.” (Clause 17) “There shall be a Session of the Parliament of Canada once at least in every year, so that twelve months shall not intervene between the last Sitting of the Parliament in one Session and its first Sitting in the next Session.” (Section 20) “Every House of Commons shall continue for five years from the Day of the Return of the Writs for choosing the House (subject to be sooner dissolved by the Governor General), and no longer.” (Section 50) “The Governor-General shall, from time to time, in the Queen's name, by instrument under the Great Seal of Canada, summon and call together the House of Commons.” (Section 38) “Either the English or the French language may be used by any person in the Debates of the House of the Parliament of Canada and of the House of the Legislation of Quebec, and both these languages are used in the respective records and Journals of those Houses; and either of those languages may be used by any person or in any Pleading or Process or in issuing from any Court of Canada established under the Constitution Act and in or from all or any of the Courts of Quebec.” (Section 133) “91.
    [Show full text]
  • Question of Privilege Relating to the Failure of the Government to Fully Provide the Documents As Ordered by the House
    HOUSE OF COMMONS CANADA QUESTION OF PRIVILEGE RELATING TO THE FAILURE OF THE GOVERNMENT TO FULLY PROVIDE THE DOCUMENTS AS ORDERED BY THE HOUSE Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs Joe Preston, M.P. Chair MARCH 2011 40th PARLIAMENT, 3rd SESSION Published under the authority of the Speaker of the House of Commons SPEAKER’S PERMISSION Reproduction of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees, in whole or in part and in any medium, is hereby permitted provided that the reproduction is accurate and is not presented as official. This permission does not extend to reproduction, distribution or use for commercial purpose of financial gain. Reproduction or use outside this permission or without authorization may be treated as copyright infringement in accordance with the Copyright Act. Authorization may be obtained on written application to the Office of the Speaker of the House of Commons. Reproduction in accordance with this permission does not constitute publication under the authority of the House of Commons. The absolute privilege that applies to the proceedings of the House of Commons does not extend to these permitted reproductions. Where a reproduction includes briefs to a Standing Committee of the House of Commons, authorization for reproduction may be required from the authors in accordance with the Copyright Act. Nothing in this permission abrogates or derogates from the privileges, powers, immunities and rights of the House of Commons and its Committees. For greater certainty, this permission does not affect the prohibition against impeaching or questioning the proceedings of the House of Commons in courts or otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • C-6 CANADA YEAR BOOK the Hon. Hedard Robichaud, April 22, 1963
    C-6 CANADA YEAR BOOK The Hon. Hedard Robichaud, April 22, 1963 The Hon. Leonard Stephen Marchand, The Hon. Roger Teillet, April 22, 1963 September 15, 1976 The Hon. Charies Mills Drury, April 22, 1963 The Hon. John Roberts, September 15, 1976 The Hon. Maurice Sauve, February 3, 1964 The Hon. Monique Begin, September 15, 1976 The Hon. Yvon Dupuis, February 3, 1964 The Hon. Jean-Jacques Blais, September 15, 1976 The Hon. Edgar John Benson, June 29, 1964 The Hon. Francis Fox, September 15, 1976 The Hon. Leo Alphonse Joseph Cadieux, The Hon. Anthony Chisholm Abbott, February 15, 1965 September 15, 1976 The Hon. Lawrence T. Pennell, July 7, 1965 The Hon. lona Campagnolo, September 15, 1976 The Hon. Jean-Luc Pepin, July 7, 1965 The Hon. Joseph-Philippe Guay, November 3, 1976 The Hon. Alan Aylesworth Macnaughton, The Hon. John Henry Horner, April 21, 1977 October 25, 1965 The Hon. Norman A. Cafik, September 16, 1977 The Hon. Jean Marchand, December 18, 1965 The Hon. J. Gilles Lamontagne, January 19, 1978 The Hon. Joseph Julien Jean-Pierre Cote, The Hon. John M. Reid, November 24, 1978 December 18, 1965 The Hon. Pierre De Bane, November 24, 1978 TheRt. Hon. John Napier Turner, December 18, 1965 The Rt. Hon. Charles Joseph (Joe) Clark, June 4, 1979 The Rt. Hon. Pierre Elliott Trudeau, April 4, 1967 The Hon. Flora Isabel MacDonald, June 4, 1979 The Hon. Joseph-Jacques-Jean Chretien, April 4, 1967 The Hon. James A. McGrath, June 4, 1979 The Hon. Pauline Vanier, April II, 1967 The Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • STRENGTHENING PARLIAMENTARY SCRUTINY of ESTIMATES and SUPPLY Report of the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estim
    STRENGTHENING PARLIAMENTARY SCRUTINY OF ESTIMATES AND SUPPLY Report of the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates Pat Martin, M.P. Chair JUNE 2012 41st PARLIAMENT, FIRST SESSION Published under the authority of the Speaker of the House of Commons SPEAKER’S PERMISSION Reproduction of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees, in whole or in part and in any medium, is hereby permitted provided that the reproduction is accurate and is not presented as official. This permission does not extend to reproduction, distribution or use for commercial purpose of financial gain. Reproduction or use outside this permission or without authorization may be treated as copyright infringement in accordance with the Copyright Act. Authorization may be obtained on written application to the Office of the Speaker of the House of Commons. Reproduction in accordance with this permission does not constitute publication under the authority of the House of Commons. The absolute privilege that applies to the proceedings of the House of Commons does not extend to these permitted reproductions. Where a reproduction includes briefs to a Standing Committee of the House of Commons, authorization for reproduction may be required from the authors in accordance with the Copyright Act. Nothing in this permission abrogates or derogates from the privileges, powers, immunities and rights of the House of Commons and its Committees. For greater certainty, this permission does not affect the prohibition against impeaching or questioning the proceedings of the House of Commons in courts or otherwise. The House of Commons retains the right and privilege to find users in contempt of Parliament if a reproduction or use is not in accordance with this permission.
    [Show full text]