Puccinia Canaliculata: Ambrosia Artemisiifolia: Connecticut ­ 10667,North Carolina ­ 94, 282,North Dakota ­ 94, Ambrosia Confertifolia Arizona ­ 241, Ambrosia Sp

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Puccinia Canaliculata: Ambrosia Artemisiifolia: Connecticut ­ 10667,North Carolina ­ 94, 282,North Dakota ­ 94, Ambrosia Confertifolia Arizona ­ 241, Ambrosia Sp 1/3/2017 All data for a single taxon ***Tell us why you value the fungal databases*** Data for Puccinia canaliculata Puccinia canaliculata (Schwein.) Lagerh. (Urediniomycetes, Uredinales) ≡ Sphaeria canaliculata Schwein. 1832 Notes: Heteroecious; aecial host ­ Asteraceae; telial host ­ Cyperus. Hiratsuka et al. (The rust flora of Japan. p. 618. 1992). Distribution: HI; North America; West Indies; Japan; Taiwan. Updated prior to 1989 Fungus­Host ­ 286 records were found using the criteria: name = Puccinia canaliculata and its synonyms Puccinia canaliculata: Ambrosia artemisiifolia: Connecticut ­ 10667,North Carolina ­ 94, 282,North Dakota ­ 94, Ambrosia confertifolia Arizona ­ 241, Ambrosia sp. USSR ­ 36214, Ambrosia trifida Connecticut ­ 94, 10667,Iowa ­ 25000,Illinois ­ 94,Indiana ­ 94, 16728,Missouri ­ 94, 11289, 16728, Bahia dissecta Arizona ­ 241, Cosmos parviflorus Arizona ­ 241, Cyperus articulatus Puerto Rico ­ 5824, 24142,Virgin Islands ­ 5824,West Indies ­ 37521, Cyperus compressus China ­ 38669, 39922,Japan ­ 6973, Cyperus cylindricus Delaware ­ 16728, Cyperus difformis China ­ 8252, 36727, 38669,Japan ­ 6973,Korea ­ 39503, Cyperus diffusus China ­ 36727, Cyperus digitatus China ­ 8097,Japan ­ 22586,Taiwan ­ 7875, Cyperus distans Japan ­ 6973,Puerto Rico ­ 8525, Cyperus erythrorhizos Iowa ­ 10325,Missouri ­ 11289, Cyperus esculentus Arizona ­ 241, 3487,Bolivia ­ 5821,California ­ 94, 3163, 5608, 16728, 25284,Canada ­ 7870, 8376,Connecticut ­ 10667,District of Columbia ­ 16728,Florida ­ 16728,Iowa ­ 10325,Illinois ­ 127,Indiana ­ 16728,Jamaica ­ 22570,Kansas ­ 16728,Mexico ­ 6908, 16728,Michigan ­ 16728,Missouri ­ 11289,North Carolina ­ 282,Nebraska ­ 16728,New Jersey ­ 16728,New Mexico ­ 16728,Oklahoma ­ 2410, 16728,Pennsylvania ­ 39011,Southern states ­ 94,Texas ­ 2267, 16728,Wisconsin ­ 94,Zimbabwe ­ 8318, Cyperus esculentus var. leptostachys Argentina ­ 11172, Cyperus fendlerianus Arizona ­ 241,New Mexico ­ 16728, Cyperus ferax Colombia ­ 5034, 5035, 24349, 36089, 37597, 37824,Costa Rica ­ 8518, 39910,Cuba ­ 8361, 8519, 16728,Dominican Republic ­ 5057, 39171, 40296,Guyana ­ 24349, 40325,Puerto Rico ­ 8517, 16728, 24142, Cyperus ferox Dominican Republic ­ 9660, Cyperus filiculmis California ­ 94,Southern states ­ 94,Wisconsin ­ 94, Cyperus fuscus China ­ 36727, Cyperus giganteus Puerto Rico ­ 5824, 8517, 16728, 24142,Virgin Islands ­ 5824,West Indies ­ 37521, Cyperus globulosus Venezuela ­ 9614, 39173, Cyperus glomeratus China ­ 8252, 38669, Cyperus hallii Missouri ­ 11289, 16728, Cyperus haspan Dominican Republic ­ 5057, 9660, 39172,West Indies ­ 37521, Cyperus houghtonii Nebraska ­ 16728,Wisconsin ­ 16728, Cyperus inflexus Wisconsin ­ 2739, Cyperus iria China ­ 8097, 8252, 36727, 38669,Cuba ­ 8361,Japan ­ 6831, 6973, 22586,Taiwan ­ 7875, 8251, 8303,West Indies ­ 37521, Cyperus laevigatus Puerto Rico ­ 8517, 8524, Cyperus linearispiculatus China ­ 36727, Cyperus microiria China ­ 38669,Japan ­ 6831, 6973, 22586,Korea ­ 39503, Cyperus mutisii Jamaica ­ 16728, 22570, Cyperus obtusiflorus var. flavissimus Madagascar ­ 8516,South Africa ­ 17151, Cyperus odoratus Cuba ­ 8050,Puerto Rico ­ 5824, 8517, 8525,Virgin Islands ­ 5824,West Indies ­ 37521, Cyperus orthostachyus China ­ 22556, 38669, 39922,USSR ­ 36214, Cyperus polystachyos Japan ­ 6973, Cyperus radiatus Puerto Rico ­ 8517, 8524, Cyperus reticulatus Puerto Rico ­ 8517, 16728, Cyperus rotundus Brazil ­ 8599,California ­ 94,Cambodia ­ 24598,China ­ 8252, 34592, 36727, 38669, 39922, 43580,Colombia ­ 36089,Cuba ­ 8050, 8361,Ethiopia ­ 34859,Florida ­ 1, 16728,Hawaii ­ 1710, 26021,Kansas ­ https://nt.ars­grin.gov/fungaldatabases/new_allView.cfm?whichone=all&thisName=Puccinia%20canaliculata&organismtype=Fungus&fromAllCount=yes 1/6 1/3/2017 All data for a single taxon 16728,Mississippi ­ 1289,Oklahoma ­ 2410,Oman ­ 45422,Puerto Rico ­ 5824,Southern states ­ 94,Virgin Islands ­ 5824,West Indies ­ 37521,Wisconsin ­ 94, Cyperus rusbyi Arizona ­ 2, 241, 3487, Cyperus sanguinolentus China ­ 8097, 8252, 34592, 36727, 38669, 39922, 43580, Cyperus serotinus Taiwan ­ 7875, Cyperus sesleroides Mexico ­ 6908, 16728, Cyperus sp. Arizona ­ 3487,California ­ 25284,China ­ 30293, 36727, 38669,Colorado ­ 16728,Colombia ­ 37597, 37598, 37824,Costa Rica ­ 39910,Florida ­ 1,Guatemala ­ 16728,Guyana ­ 40325,Madagascar ­ 17151,Mexico ­ 6908, 7848, 16728,North Carolina ­ 16728,Oklahoma ­ 2410,Tanzania ­ 6827,Texas ­ 24771,West Indies ­ 37521, Cyperus speciosus Kansas ­ 16728, Cyperus sphacelatus Puerto Rico ­ 8517, Cyperus strigosus Alabama ­ 16728,California ­ 94,Canada ­ 7870, 8376,Connecticut ­ 10667,Delaware ­ 16728,Iowa ­ 10325, 16728,Illinois ­ 16728,Indiana ­ 16728,Kansas ­ 16728,Louisiana ­ 16728,Massachusetts ­ 10667,Michigan ­ 16728,Missouri ­ 11289,Mississippi ­ 1289, 16728,North Carolina ­ 282,Nebraska ­ 16728,New York ­ 16728,Oklahoma ­ 2410, 16728,Pennsylvania ­ 16728, 39011,Southern states ­ 94,Virginia ­ 16728,Vermont ­ 10667,Wisconsin ­ 94, 1157,West Virginia ­ 16728, Cyperus surinamensis Colombia ­ 36089,Cuba ­ 16728,Puerto Rico ­ 8517,Texas ­ 16728, Cyperus thyrsiflorus Mexico ­ 16728, Cyperus vahlii Dominican Republic ­ 5057, Dichromena radicans Costa Rica ­ 8518,Dominican Republic ­ 5057, Helianthus annuus Kansas ­ 36767, Heliopsis parvifolia Arizona ­ 2, 241, 3487, Inula sp. USSR ­ 36214, Kyllinga brevifolia Puerto Rico ­ 8517, Kyllinga pumila Puerto Rico ­ 8517, Pycreus globosus China ­ 36727, Senecio ampullaceus Texas ­ 2267, Xanthium canadense California ­ 5608,Massachusetts ­ 10667, Xanthium italicum Oklahoma ­ 2399, Xanthium saccharatum Arizona ­ 3487,Eastern states ­ 94,Nebraska ­ 94,New Mexico ­ 94,South central states ­ 94, Xanthium sp. Arkansas ­ 16728,Delaware ­ 16728,Iowa ­ 10325, 16728,Indiana ­ 16728,New Mexico ­ 16728,Oklahoma ­ 2410,Pennsylvania ­ 16728, 39011,USSR ­ 36214, Xanthium strumarium Arizona ­ 241, An * indicates a questionable report. Click on associated reference link for more information. Literature ­ 84 records were found using the criteria: name = Puccinia canaliculata Alfieri Jr., S.A., Langdon, K.R., Wehlburg, C., and Kimbrough, J.W. 1984. Index of Plant Diseases in Florida (Revised). Florida Dept. Agric. and Consumer Serv., Div. Plant Ind. Bull. 11: 1­389. (1) Alvarez, M.G. 1976. Primer catalogo de enfermedades de plantas Mexicanas. Fitofilo 71: 1­169. (7848) Anonymous 1931­1970. California Fungi. Nos. 1­1325. Exsiccati set, N/A pages. (3163) Anonymous 1960. Index of Plant Diseases in the United States. U.S.D.A. Agric. Handb. 165: 1­531. (94) Anonymous 1979. List of plant diseases in Taiwan. Pl. Protect. Soc., Republ. of China, 404 pages. (8303) Arnold, G.R.W. 1986. Lista de Hongos Fitopatogenos de Cuba. Ministerio de Cultura Editorial Cientifico­Tecnica, 207 pages. (8050) Arthur, J.C. 1915. Uredinales of Porto Rico based on collections by F.L. Stevens. Mycologia 7: 168­196, 315­332. (8524) Arthur, J.C. 1916. Uredinales of Porto Rico based on collections by F.L. Stevens. Mycologia 8: 16­33. (8525) Arthur, J.C. 1917. Uredinales of Porto Rico based on collections by H.H. Whetzel and E.W. Olive. Mycologia 9: 55­104. (8517) Arthur, J.C. 1918. Uredinales of Costa Rica based on collections by E.W.D. Holway. Mycologia 10: 111­154. (8518) Arthur, J.C., and Johnston, J.R. 1917. Uredinales of Cuba. Mem. Torrey Bot. Club 17: 97­175. (8519) Azbukina, Z.M. 1984. [Key to the rust fungi of the Soviet Far East]. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Moscow, 286 pages. (36214) Barreto, R.W., and Evans, H.C. 1995. Mycobiota of the weed Cyperus rotundus in the state of Rio de Janeiro, with an elucidation of its associated Puccinia complex. Mycol. Res. 99: 407­419. (8599) Berndt, R. 2004. A checklist of Costa Rican rust fungi. Pages 185­236 in Agerer, R., M. Piepenbring, and P. Blanz. Frontiers in Basidiomycete Mycology. IHW­Verlag. 428 pg. (39910) Blasdale, W.C. 1919. A preliminary list of the Uredinales of California. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 7: 101­157. (5608) Boewe, G.H. 1964. Some plant diseases new to Illinois. Pl. Dis. Reporter 48: 866­870. (127) https://nt.ars­grin.gov/fungaldatabases/new_allView.cfm?whichone=all&thisName=Puccinia%20canaliculata&organismtype=Fungus&fromAllCount=yes 2/6 1/3/2017 All data for a single taxon Bouriquet, G., and Bassino, J.­P. 1965. Les Uredinees De Madagascar. Paris, France, 177 pages. (8516) Buritica, P., and Pardo Cardona, V.M. 1996. Flora Uredineana Colombiana. Rev. Acad. Colomb. Cienc. 20: 183­236. (37597) Cao, Z.­m., Li, Z.Q., and Zhuang, J.­Y. 2000. Uredinales from the Qinling Mountains (continued I). Mycosystema 19: 181­192. (34592) Cao, Z.­m., and Li, Z.­Q. 1999. Rust Fungi of Qinling Mountains. China Forestry Publishing House, 188 pages. (43580) Castellani, E., and Ciferri, R. 1950. Mycoflora Erythraea, Somala et Aethipica Suppl. 1. Atti Ist. Bot. Lab. Crittog. Univ. Pavia, 52 pages. (34859) Chardon, C.e., and Toro, R.A. 1930. Mycological explorations of Colombia. J. Dept. Agric. Porto Rico 14: 195­369. (5035) Chardon, C.e., and Toro, R.A. 1934. Mycological Explorations of Venezuela. Monogr. Univ. Puerto Rico, B 2: 1­351. (9614) Cho, W.D., and Shin, H.D., Eds. 2004. List of plant diseases in Korea. Fourth edition. Korean Society of Plant Pathology, 779 pages. (39503) Ciferri, R. 1929. Micoflora Domingensis. Lista de los hongos hasta la fecha indicados en Santo Domingo. Ser. B, Bot. Estac. Agron. Moca 14: 1­260. (40296) Ciferri, R. 1961. Mycoflora Domingensis Integrata. Quaderno 19: 1­539. (9660) Conners, I.L. 1967. An Annotated Index of Plant Diseases in Canada and Fungi Recorded on Plants in Alaska, Canada and Greenland.
Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Species List for Bob Janes Preserve
    Plant Species List for Bob Janes Preserve Scientific and Common names obtained from Wunderlin 2013 Scientific Name Common Name Status EPPC FDA IRC FNAI Family: Azollaceae (mosquito fern) Azolla caroliniana mosquito fern native R Family: Blechnaceae (mid-sorus fern) Blechnum serrulatum swamp fern native Woodwardia virginica Virginia chain fern native R Family: Dennstaedtiaceae (cuplet fern) Pteridium aquilinum braken fern native Family: Nephrolepidaceae (sword fern) Nephrolepis cordifolia tuberous sword fern exotic II Nephrolepis exaltata wild Boston fern native Family: Ophioglossaceae (adder's-tongue) Ophioglossum palmatum hand fern native E I G4/S2 Family: Osmundaceae (royal fern) Osmunda cinnamomea cinnamon fern native CE R Osmunda regalis royal fern native CE R Family: Polypodiaceae (polypody) Campyloneurum phyllitidis long strap fern native Phlebodium aureum golden polypody native Pleopeltis polypodioides resurrection fern native Family: Psilotaceae (whisk-fern) Psilotum nudum whisk-fern native Family: Pteridaceae (brake fern) Acrostichum danaeifolium giant leather fern native Pteris vittata China ladder break exotic II Family: Salviniaceae (floating fern) Salvinia minima water spangles exotic I Family: Schizaeaceae (curly-grass) Lygodium japonicum Japanese climbing fern exotic I Lygodium microphyllum small-leaf climbing fern exotic I Family: Thelypteridaceae (marsh fern) Thelypteris interrupta hottentot fern native Thelypteris kunthii widespread maiden fern native Thelypteris palustris var. pubescens marsh fern native R Family: Vittariaceae
    [Show full text]
  • Cyperaceae of Puerto Rico. Arturo Gonzalez-Mas Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1964 Cyperaceae of Puerto Rico. Arturo Gonzalez-mas Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Gonzalez-mas, Arturo, "Cyperaceae of Puerto Rico." (1964). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 912. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/912 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been 64—8802 microfilmed exactly as received GONZALEZ—MAS, Arturo, 1923- CYPERACEAE OF PUERTO RICO. Louisiana State University, Ph.D., 1964 B o ta n y University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan CYPERACEAE OF PUERTO RICO A Dissertation I' Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Botany and Plant Pathology by Arturo Gonzalez-Mas B.S., University of Puerto Rico, 1945 M.S., North Carolina State College, 1952 January, 1964 PLEASE NOTE: Not original copy. Small and unreadable print on some maps. Filmed as received. UNIVERSITY MICROFILMS, INC. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The author wishes to express his sincere gratitude to Dr. Clair A. Brown for his interest, guidance, and encouragement during the course of this investigation and for his helpful criticism in the preparation of the manuscript and illustrations.
    [Show full text]
  • National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands 1996
    National List of Vascular Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary Indicator by Region and Subregion Scientific Name/ North North Central South Inter- National Subregion Northeast Southeast Central Plains Plains Plains Southwest mountain Northwest California Alaska Caribbean Hawaii Indicator Range Abies amabilis (Dougl. ex Loud.) Dougl. ex Forbes FACU FACU UPL UPL,FACU Abies balsamea (L.) P. Mill. FAC FACW FAC,FACW Abies concolor (Gord. & Glend.) Lindl. ex Hildebr. NI NI NI NI NI UPL UPL Abies fraseri (Pursh) Poir. FACU FACU FACU Abies grandis (Dougl. ex D. Don) Lindl. FACU-* NI FACU-* Abies lasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt. NI NI FACU+ FACU- FACU FAC UPL UPL,FAC Abies magnifica A. Murr. NI UPL NI FACU UPL,FACU Abildgaardia ovata (Burm. f.) Kral FACW+ FAC+ FAC+,FACW+ Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL FACU- FACU- UPL UPL UPL UPL UPL NI NI UPL,FACU- Acacia choriophylla Benth. FAC* FAC* Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd. FACU NI NI* NI NI FACU Acacia greggii Gray UPL UPL FACU FACU UPL,FACU Acacia macracantha Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd. NI FAC FAC Acacia minuta ssp. minuta (M.E. Jones) Beauchamp FACU FACU Acaena exigua Gray OBL OBL Acalypha bisetosa Bertol. ex Spreng. FACW FACW Acalypha virginica L. FACU- FACU- FAC- FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acalypha virginica var. rhomboidea (Raf.) Cooperrider FACU- FAC- FACU FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acanthocereus tetragonus (L.) Humm. FAC* NI NI FAC* Acanthomintha ilicifolia (Gray) Gray FAC* FAC* Acanthus ebracteatus Vahl OBL OBL Acer circinatum Pursh FAC- FAC NI FAC-,FAC Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FAC FACU FACU* FAC FACU FACU*,FAC Acer grandidentatum Nutt.
    [Show full text]
  • Antiparasitic Effects of Medicinal Plants (Part 1)- a Review
    IOSR Journal Of Pharmacy www.iosrphr.org (e)-ISSN: 2250-3013, (p)-ISSN: 2319-4219 Volume 6, Issue 10 Version. 3 (October 2016), PP. 51-66 Antiparasitic effects of medicinal plants (part 1)- A review Prof Dr Ali Esmail Al-Snafi Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Thi qar University, Nasiriyah, Iraq . Cell: +9647801397994. Email: [email protected] Abstract: Many previous researches showed that many plants exerted antiparasitic, antiprotozoal, molluscicidal and insecticidal. These plants included: Achillea santolina, Ailanthus altissima, Allium cepa, Allium sativum, Ammi majus, Anagyris foetida, Antirrhinum majus, Apium graveolens, Arachis hypogaea, Artemisia campestris, Arundo donax, Asclepias curassavica, Ballota nigra, Bauhinia variegate, Betula alba, Bidens tripartite, Brassica nigra, Bryophyllum calycinum, Caccinia crassifolia, Caesalpinia crista,Calendula officinalis, Calotropis procera, Canna indica, Capparis spinosa, Carum carvi, Cassia occidentalis, Celosia cristata, Chenopodium album, Chorchorus capsularis, Chrysanthemum cinerariaefolium, Cichorium intybus, Citrullus colocynthis, Citrus limetta, Citrus medica, Citrus sinensis, Citrus limonum, Citrus aurantifolia, Citrus reticulate, Citrus vitis, Clerodendron inerme, Clitoria ternatea, Corchorus capsularis, Cordia myxa, Coriandrum sativum, Coronilla scorpioides, Coronilla varia, Crocus sativus, Cupressus sempervirens, Cymbopogon schoenanthus, Cyminum cuminum, Cynodon dactylon, Dalbergia sissoo, Datura metel, Datura stramonium, Dianthus caryophyllum, Digitalis purpurea,
    [Show full text]
  • Marginal Plants Hardy & Tropical
    Marginal Plants Hardy & Tropical For more information about the Colorado Water Garden Society or other aspects of pond keeping along the front-range go to: http://www.colowatergardensociety.org or send an e-mail to: [email protected] Written by Bob Hoffman, originally published 2005 Revised by Bob Hoffman & Edited by Dorothy Martinez 2013 ©Copyright 1999 - 2021, All Rights Reserved www.colowatergardensociety.org This brochure will investigate marginal plants by species. Marginal plants are used in the shallow part of your pond. Water plants are listed with a hardiness zone where they are best grown, but with some care most water plants can be kept year-round. Most water plants are listed as hardy or tropical. For those of us living in Metro Denver, depending on our Winter, "hardy" translates to mean zone 5 or 6. A tropical to us is normally zone 7. What that means is any plant with a zone 7 or higher must be protected, while zone 6 is borderline. Protection can mean protection from freezing to treating the plant as a houseplant for the Winter. HARDY MARGINALS ARROW ARUM Araceae Peltandra, Zone 5 - 9 Arrowhead shaped leaf on a 1' - 2' tall stem Peltandra sagittifolia can produce white flowers. Peltandra virginica can produce green flowers. Sun to shade. ARROWHEAD Alismataceae Sagittaria latifolia, Zone 5 - 10 Arrow-shaped green leaves with small white flowers. Sun. BOGBEAN Menyanthaceae Menyanthes trifoliata, Zone 3 - 10 An herbaceous perennial 9" - 12" tall with three-lobed, dark green leaves with short-lived white flowers in the Spring. Sun. CATTAIL Typhaceae Typha, Zone 3 - 11 Typha angustifolia has a narrow-leaf cattail and grows to 4'.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on Cyperus Rotundus a Potential Medicinal Plant
    IOSR Journal Of Pharmacy www.iosrphr.org (e)-ISSN: 2250-3013, (p)-ISSN: 2319-4219 Volume 6, Issue 7 Version. 2 (July 2016), PP. 32-48 A review on Cyperus rotundus A potential medicinal plant Prof Dr Ali Esmail Al-Snafi Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Thi qar University, Iraq Abstract:- Many previous studies showed Cyperus rotundus contained flavonoids, tannins, glycosides, furochromones, monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, sitosterol, alkaloids saponins, terpenoids, essential oils, starch, carbohydrates, protein, separated amino acids and many other secondary metabolites. The previous works also showed that the plant exerted antiparasitic, insecticidal, repellent, antibacterial, antioxidant, anticancer, central nervous, neuroprotective, antiinflammatory, antipyretic, analgesic, hypolipidemic, weight control, antiplatelet, gastrointestinal, hepatoprotective, antidiabetic, anti-dysmenorrhea, dermatological and many other effects. This review was designed to highlight the chemical constituents and pharmacological effects of Cyperus rotundus. Keywords:- pharmacology, pharmacognosy, medicinal plants, constituents, Cyperus rotundus I. INTRODUCTION Herbal medicine is the oldest form of medicine known to mankind. It was the mainstay of many early civilizations and still the most widely practiced form of medicine in the world today[1]. WHO has estimated that perhaps 80% of the inhabitants of the world rely chiefly on traditional medicines for their primary health care needs. In the developed countries, in the USA, for example, 25% of all prescriptions dispensed from community pharmacies from 1959 to 1980 contained plant extracts or active principles prepared from higher plants[2]. Plants generally produce many secondary metabolites which were constituted an important source of many pharmaceutical drugs[3]. Many previous reviews revealed the wide range of the pharmacological and therapeutic effects of medicinal plants[4-45].
    [Show full text]
  • Estudos Anatômicos De Cyperaceae (Poales) Com Ênfase Na Anatomia Kranz
    UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA “JÚLIO DE MESQUITA FILHO” INSTITUTO DE BIOCIÊNCIAS - RIO CLARO PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS BIOLOGIA VEGETAL Estudos anatômicos de Cyperaceae (Poales) com ênfase na anatomia Kranz Shirley Martins Tese apresentada ao Instituto de Biociências do Campus de Rio Claro, Universidade Estadual Paulista, como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do título de Doutora em Ciências Biológicas (Biologia Vegetal). Junho - 2012 UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA “JÚLIO DE MESQUITA FILHO” INSTITUTO DE BIOCIÊNCIAS - RIO CLARO PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS BIOLOGIA VEGETAL Estudos anatômicos de Cyperaceae (Poales) com ênfase na anatomia Kranz Shirley Martins Orientadora: Profa. Dra. Vera Lucia Scatena Tese apresentada ao Instituto de Biociências do Campus de Rio Claro, Universidade Estadual Paulista, como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do título de Doutora em Ciências Biológicas (Biologia Vegetal). Junho - 2012 i Dedico Minha mãe Silvia Martins por seu exemplo de luta e superação e pelo amor incondicional. ii Agradecimentos A Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), pela bolsa concedida no primeiro ano de doutorado (Processo: 33004137) e a Fundação de Apoio a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) pela bolsa concedida nos três últimos anos de doutorado (Processo: 2008/09380-2). Ao Departamento de Botânica do Instituto de Biociências, UNESP/Rio Claro, pela infraestrutura disponibilizada para o desenvolvimento dessa pesquisa. Aos funcionários da Seção de Pós-Graduação, da Biblioteca e do Departamento de Botânica, pela ajuda e atenção, especialmente a secretária Célia Hebling e ao técnico Ari Pesce, pela atenção e amizade. Agradeço aos professores do Departamento de Botânica da UNESP/Rio Claro pelo enorme aprendizado durante as disciplinas e pelas importantes conversas científicas ou não científicas nos corredores.
    [Show full text]
  • Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Dark Septate Fungi in Plants Associated with Aquatic Environments Doi: 10.1590/0102-33062016Abb0296
    Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and dark septate fungi in plants associated with aquatic environments doi: 10.1590/0102-33062016abb0296 Table S1. Presence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and/or dark septate fungi (DSF) in non-flowering plants and angiosperms, according to data from 62 papers. A: arbuscule; V: vesicle; H: intraradical hyphae; % COL: percentage of colonization. MYCORRHIZAL SPECIES AMF STRUCTURES % AMF COL AMF REFERENCES DSF DSF REFERENCES LYCOPODIOPHYTA1 Isoetales Isoetaceae Isoetes coromandelina L. A, V, H 43 38; 39 Isoetes echinospora Durieu A, V, H 1.9-14.5 50 + 50 Isoetes kirkii A. Braun not informed not informed 13 Isoetes lacustris L.* A, V, H 25-50 50; 61 + 50 Lycopodiales Lycopodiaceae Lycopodiella inundata (L.) Holub A, V 0-18 22 + 22 MONILOPHYTA2 Equisetales Equisetaceae Equisetum arvense L. A, V 2-28 15; 19; 52; 60 + 60 Osmundales Osmundaceae Osmunda cinnamomea L. A, V 10 14 Salviniales Marsileaceae Marsilea quadrifolia L.* V, H not informed 19;38 Salviniaceae Azolla pinnata R. Br.* not informed not informed 19 Salvinia cucullata Roxb* not informed 21 4; 19 Salvinia natans Pursh V, H not informed 38 Polipodiales Dryopteridaceae Polystichum lepidocaulon (Hook.) J. Sm. A, V not informed 30 Davalliaceae Davallia mariesii T. Moore ex Baker A not informed 30 Onocleaceae Matteuccia struthiopteris (L.) Tod. A not informed 30 Onoclea sensibilis L. A, V 10-70 14; 60 + 60 Pteridaceae Acrostichum aureum L. A, V, H 27-69 42; 55 Adiantum pedatum L. A not informed 30 Aleuritopteris argentea (S. G. Gmel) Fée A, V not informed 30 Pteris cretica L. A not informed 30 Pteris multifida Poir.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification and Description of World Formation Types
    United States Department of Agriculture Classification and Description of World Formation Types Don Faber-Langendoen, Todd Keeler-Wolf, Del Meidinger, Carmen Josse, Alan Weakley, David Tart, Gonzalo Navarro, Bruce Hoagland, Serguei Ponomarenko, Gene Fults, Eileen Helmer Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Service Research Station Report RMRS-GTR-346 August 2016 Faber-Langendoen, D.; Keeler-Wolf, T.; Meidinger, D.; Josse, C.; Weakley, A.; Tart, D.; Navarro, G.; Hoagland, B.; Ponomarenko, S.; Fults, G.; Helmer, E. 2016. Classification and description of world formation types. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-346. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 222 p. Abstract An ecological vegetation classification approach has been developed in which a combi- nation of vegetation attributes (physiognomy, structure, and floristics) and their response to ecological and biogeographic factors are used as the basis for classifying vegetation types. This approach can help support international, national, and subnational classifica- tion efforts. The classification structure was largely developed by the Hierarchy Revisions Working Group (HRWG), which contained members from across the Americas. The HRWG was authorized by the U.S. Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) to devel- op a revised global vegetation classification to replace the earlier versions of the structure that guided the U.S. National Vegetation Classification and International Vegetation Classification, which formerly relied on the UNESCO (1973) global classification (see FGDC 1997; Grossman and others 1998). This document summarizes the develop- ment of the upper formation levels. We first describe the history of the Hierarchy Revisions Working Group and discuss the three main parameters that guide the clas- sification—it focuses on vegetated parts of the globe, on existing vegetation, and includes (but distinguishes) both cultural and natural vegetation for which parallel hierarchies are provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Phase II Report
    Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Phase II Report By Dr. Terri Hildebrand Southern Utah University, Cedar City, UT and Dr. Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting, Kanab, UT Colorado Plateau Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit Agreement # H1200-09-0005 1 May 2012 Prepared for Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Southern Utah University National Park Service Mojave Network TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # Introduction . 4 Study Area . 6 History and Setting . 6 Geology and Associated Ecoregions . 6 Soils and Climate . 7 Vegetation . 10 Previous Botanical Studies . 11 Methods . 17 Results . 21 Discussion . 28 Conclusions . 32 Acknowledgments . 33 Literature Cited . 34 Figures Figure 1. Location of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 5 Figure 2. Ecoregions and 2010-2011 collection sites in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 8 Figure 3. Soil types and 2010-2011 collection sites in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 9 Figure 4. Increase in the number of plant taxa confirmed as present in Grand Canyon- Parashant National Monument by decade, 1900-2011 . 13 Figure 5. Southern Utah University students enrolled in the 2010 Plant Anatomy and Diversity course that collected during the 30 August 2010 experiential learning event . 18 Figure 6. 2010-2011 collection sites and transportation routes in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 22 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # Tables Table 1. Chronology of plant-collecting efforts at Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument . 14 Table 2. Data fields in the annotated checklist of the flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument (Appendices A, B, C, and D) .
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinated Resource Management Plan
    APPLETON-WHITTELL RESEARCH RANCH COORDINATED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN The Research Ranch was established in 1968 by the Appleton family as an ecological field station to provide a large scale exclosure by which various land uses and actions in the Southwest could be evaluated. This role, as a control or reference area, creates challenges to land management actions. Each proposed action must be judged not only on the conservation outcome but also on the potential to have adverse impact on the research values for which the field station was established. Effective management for both conservation and research is only possible if all partners are informed and involved. The Research Ranch, approximately 8,000 acres, is a complicated partnership among land owners and federal land administrative agencies: Coronado National Forest (CNF), Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Resolution Copper Mining Co. (RCM), The Research Ranch Foundation (TRRF), The Nature Conservancy (TNC), and National Audubon Society (NAS or Audubon). NAS manages the facility via contractual agreements with each entity. The Research Ranch is a Center/Sanctuary of NAS, administered through the Audubon Arizona state office in Phoenix. Audubon’s strategic plan is to achieve conservation results on a broad scale by leveraging the NAS network and engaging diverse people; the Research Ranch is evaluated by NAS for its support of the following conservation concerns: Climate Change, Water, Working Lands and Bird Friendly Communities. This Coordinated Resource Management Plan (CRMP) constitutes all ownership along with the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), Arizona Game & Fish Department (AZGF) and US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS). Planned practices to meet goals listed in this CRMP may not necessarily be implemented on all parcels.
    [Show full text]