DOCSLIB.ORG

Lie Group Structures on Quotient Groups and Universal Complexifications for Infinite-Dimensional Lie Groups

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lie Group Structures on Quotient Groups and Universal Complexifications for Infinite-Dimensional Lie Groups View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Journal of Functional Analysis 194, 347–409 (2002) doi:10.1006/jfan.2002.3942 Lie Group Structures on Quotient Groups and Universal Complexifications for Infinite-Dimensional Lie Groups Helge Glo¨ ckner1 Department of Mathematics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803-4918 E-mail: [email protected] Communicated by L. Gross Received September 4, 2001; revised November 15, 2001; accepted December 16, 2001 We characterize the existence of Lie group structures on quotient groups and the existence of universal complexifications for the class of Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff (BCH–) Lie groups, which subsumes all Banach–Lie groups and ‘‘linear’’ direct limit r r Lie groups, as well as the mapping groups CK ðM; GÞ :¼fg 2 C ðM; GÞ : gjM=K ¼ 1g; for every BCH–Lie group G; second countable finite-dimensional smooth manifold M; compact subset SK of M; and 04r41: Also the corresponding test function r r # groups D ðM; GÞ¼ K CK ðM; GÞ are BCH–Lie groups. 2002 Elsevier Science (USA) 0. INTRODUCTION It is a well-known fact in the theory of Banach–Lie groups that the topological quotient group G=N of a real Banach–Lie group G by a closed normal Lie subgroup N is a Banach–Lie group provided LðNÞ is complemented in LðGÞ as a topological vector space [7, 30]. Only recently, it was observed that the hypothesis that LðNÞ be complemented can be omitted [17, Theorem II.2]. This strengthened result is then used in [17] to characterize those real Banach–Lie groups which possess a universal complexification in the category of complex Banach–Lie groups. It is the goal of the present paper to extend these results to more general classes of infinite-dimensional Lie groups, and to discuss interesting examples. We mainly focus on a class of Lie groups which we call ‘‘Baker– Campbell–Hausdorff (BCH)–Lie groups.’’ These are analytic Lie groups in the sense of [13], modelled on arbitrary, not necessarily sequentially complete, locally convex spaces, whose exponential function induces a local 1 Present address: Department of Mathematics, Darmstadt University of Technology, Schlossgartenstr. 7, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany. 347 0022-1236/02 $35.00 # 2002 Elsevier Science (USA) All rights reserved. 348 HELGE GLO¨ CKNER diffeomorphism at 0 and whose group multiplication is given locally by the Campbell–Hausdorff series (see Section 2 for details). Thus, by definition, BCH–Lie groups share some of the most important properties of Banach– Lie groups. Although the class of BCH–Lie groups excludes diffeomorphism groups and other infinite-dimensional Lie groups which behave quite unlike Banach–Lie groups, it subsumes many important examples. In particular, beside Banach–Lie groups, every linear direct limit Lie group is a BCH–Lie group, and so are all groups of mappings or test functions with values in BCH–Lie groups, as will be shown below. In this article, we develop the general Lie theory of BCH–Lie groups, and in particular a general theory of universal complexifications for these groups. The general results are then applied to the specific examples of BCH–Lie groups described before. It turns out that universal complexifications exist for these groups under natural hypotheses, and we find explicit descriptions of the universal complexifications in important cases. We remark that, as opposed to universal complexifications, many authors call a complex Lie group H a ‘‘complexification’’ of a given real Lie group G if G is a subgroup of H and LðHÞ¼LðGÞC (e.g., [25] in the finite- dimensional case, [29, 42] in the infinite-dimensional setting). This point of view is sufficient for many practical purposes. However, already in the finite- dimensional case, many Lie groups do not possess complexifications in the preceding sense; and if such a complexification exists, it need not be uniquely determined. In contrast, a universal complexification of a real Lie group G in a given category A of complex Lie groups is a complex Lie group GC 2 ob A which satisfies a suitable universal property together with a (not necessarily injective) smooth homomorphism gG : G ! GC (cf. [7, 17, 21]). Whenever it exists, GC is unique up to isomorphism. Surpris- ingly, although it is well-known that every finite-dimensional Lie group has a universal complexification in the category of finite-dimensional complex Lie groups [7], and although universal complexifications are a standard topic in textbooks on finite-dimensional Lie groups, universal complex- ifications of infinite-dimensional Lie groups have hardly been studied in the literature. Only recently, the existence question of universal complex- ifications of Banach–Lie groups was raised in [12] and then fully solved in [17]. In particular, it is known now that there are real Banach–Lie groups which do not have universal complexifications in the category of complex Banach–Lie groups. A theory of universal complex- ifications for more general classes of infinite-dimensional Lie groups is still missing in the literature. The present paper intends to close this gap, at least for the class of BCH–Lie groups. In particular, for a real BCH–Lie group G; we shall find a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a universal complexification in the category of complex BCH–Lie groups, as well as a sufficient condition for the existence of a universal complexification LIE GROUP STRUCTURES 349 in the category of all complex Lie groups with complex analytic exponential functions. Let us briefly outline the contents of the individual sections now, summarize the main results, and relate them to the literature. We begin with general terminology and basic facts concerning smooth and analytic Lie groups, as well as the required differential calculus (Section 1). In Section 2, we define BCH–Lie groups and develop the basic Lie theory for such groups, for later use.2 Generalizing the recent results concerning quotients of Banach–Lie groups mentioned above, we prove (Corollary 2.21; see Theorem 2.20 for a complex analogue): 0.1. Quotient Theorem. Let G be a real BCH–Lie group and N be a closed, normal subgroup of G. Then the topological quotient group G=N can be given a real BCH–Lie group structure if and only if N is a Lie subgroup of G. If G is a Banach–Lie group here, we obtain a second characterization in the spirit of the solution to Hilbert’s fifth problem: G=N is a Banach–Lie group if and only if it has no small subgroups. It is well known that the group CrðK; GÞ of Cr-mappings on a compact smooth manifold K with values in a finite-dimensional Lie group G is a 1 Banach–Lie group for r 2 N0; and that C ðK; GÞ is a Fre´ chet–Lie group satisfying the axioms of a BCH–Lie group (see, for example, [31]). For infinite-dimensional G modelled on sequentially complete spaces, CðK; GÞ had been made a Lie group in [37]. The groups D1ðM; GÞ of smooth test functions with values in a finite-dimensional Lie group G had already been given a topological group structure making them ‘‘nuclear Lie groups’’ in 1 [1]. For finite-dimensional G; the Lie groups CK ðM; GÞ have been considered in [33, 34] and a direct limit argument has been used there to specify an analytic structure on D1ðM; GÞ:3 Generalizing these construc- tions, we establish results slightly more general than the following (Sections 3 and 4): 0.2. Mapping Groups and Test Function Groups. Suppose that M is a s-compact finite-dimensional smooth manifold, K M a compact subset, N K r r 2 0 [ f1g; and G a smooth (resp., -analytic) Lie group. Then CK ðM; GÞ and DrðM; GÞ can be made smooth (resp., K-analytic) Lie groups in a natural r r K way, with Lie algebras CK ðM; LðGÞÞ and D ðM; LðGÞÞ: IfGisa -analytic r r BCH–Lie group, then so are CK ðM; GÞ and D ðM; GÞ: 2 Several interesting results concerning the closely related class of ‘‘CBH–Lie groups’’ can be found in [43]. For the most part, the material we present is complementary. 3 We should also mention the ‘‘weighted gauge groups’’ (with values in finite-dimensional Lie groups) studied in [5]. 350 HELGE GLO¨ CKNER A smooth Lie group structure on C1ðM; GÞ in the sense of ‘‘convenient differential calculus’’ had already been established in [26], for any smooth Lie group G in that sense. In Sections 5 and 7, we develop a general theory of universal complex- ifications for BCH–Lie groups. As our third main result, we obtain a characterization of those real BCH–Lie groups which possess a universal complexification in the category of complex BCH–Lie groups (cf. Theorem 7.2, Corollary 7.6): 0.3. Complexification Theorem. Given a real BCH–Lie group G, let N be the intersection of all kernels of smooth homomorphisms from G into complex BCH–Lie groups. Then G has a universal complexification GC in the category of complex BCH–Lie groups if and only if N is a Lie subgroup of G and ðLðGÞ=LðNÞÞC is enlargible. In this case, LðGCÞffiðLðGÞ=LðNÞÞC: If GC exists in the category of complex BCH–Lie groups and N is a discrete subgroup of G, then in fact GC is a universal complexification for G in the category of all complex Lie groups with complex analytic exponential functions. Here, the final assertion is based on a general existence criterion (Theorem 5.4): 0.4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quotient Groups §7.8 (Ed.2), 8.4 (Ed.2): Quotient Groups and Homomorphisms, Part I
    Math 371 Lecture #33 x7.7 (Ed.2), 8.3 (Ed.2): Quotient Groups x7.8 (Ed.2), 8.4 (Ed.2): Quotient Groups and Homomorphisms, Part I Recall that to make the set of right cosets of a subgroup K in a group G into a group under the binary operation (or product) (Ka)(Kb) = K(ab) requires that K be a normal subgroup of G. For a normal subgroup N of a group G, we denote the set of right cosets of N in G by G=N (read G mod N). Theorem 8.12. For a normal subgroup N of a group G, the product (Na)(Nb) = N(ab) on G=N is well-defined. We saw the proof of this before. Theorem 8.13. For a normal subgroup N of a group G, we have (1) G=N is a group under the product (Na)(Nb) = N(ab), (2) when jGj < 1 that jG=Nj = jGj=jNj, and (3) when G is abelian, so is G=N. Proof. (1) We know that the product is well-defined. The identity element of G=N is Ne because for all a 2 G we have (Ne)(Na) = N(ae) = Na; (Na)(Ne) = N(ae) = Na: The inverse of Na is Na−1 because (Na)(Na−1) = N(aa−1) = Ne; (Na−1)(Na) = N(a−1a) = Ne: Associativity of the product in G=N follows from the associativity in G: [(Na)(Nb)](Nc) = (N(ab))(Nc) = N((ab)c) = N(a(bc)) = (N(a))(N(bc)) = (N(a))[(N(b))(N(c))]: This establishes G=N as a group.
    [Show full text]
  • The Category of Generalized Lie Groups 283
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 199, 1974 THE CATEGORYOF GENERALIZEDLIE GROUPS BY SU-SHING CHEN AND RICHARD W. YOH ABSTRACT. We consider the category r of generalized Lie groups. A generalized Lie group is a topological group G such that the set LG = Hom(R, G) of continuous homomorphisms from the reals R into G has certain Lie algebra and locally convex topological vector space structures. The full subcategory rr of f-bounded (r positive real number) generalized Lie groups is shown to be left complete. The class of locally compact groups is contained in T. Various prop- erties of generalized Lie groups G and their locally convex topological Lie algebras LG = Horn (R, G) are investigated. 1. Introduction. The category FT of finite dimensional Lie groups does not admit arbitrary Cartesian products. Therefore we shall enlarge the category £r to the category T of generalized Lie groups introduced by K. Hofmann in [ll]^1) The category T contains well-known subcategories, such as the category of compact groups [11], the category of locally compact groups (see §5) and the category of finite dimensional De groups. The Lie algebra LG = Horn (R, G) of a generalized Lie group G is a vital and important device just as in the case of finite dimensional Lie groups. Thus we consider the category SI of locally convex topological Lie algebras (§2). The full subcategory Í2r of /--bounded locally convex topological Lie algebras of £2 is roughly speaking the family of all objects on whose open semiballs of radius r the Campbell-Hausdorff formula holds.
    [Show full text]
  • Quotient-Rings.Pdf
    4-21-2018 Quotient Rings Let R be a ring, and let I be a (two-sided) ideal. Considering just the operation of addition, R is a group and I is a subgroup. In fact, since R is an abelian group under addition, I is a normal subgroup, and R the quotient group is defined. Addition of cosets is defined by adding coset representatives: I (a + I)+(b + I)=(a + b)+ I. The zero coset is 0+ I = I, and the additive inverse of a coset is given by −(a + I)=(−a)+ I. R However, R also comes with a multiplication, and it’s natural to ask whether you can turn into a I ring by multiplying coset representatives: (a + I) · (b + I)= ab + I. I need to check that that this operation is well-defined, and that the ring axioms are satisfied. In fact, everything works, and you’ll see in the proof that it depends on the fact that I is an ideal. Specifically, it depends on the fact that I is closed under multiplication by elements of R. R By the way, I’ll sometimes write “ ” and sometimes “R/I”; they mean the same thing. I Theorem. If I is a two-sided ideal in a ring R, then R/I has the structure of a ring under coset addition and multiplication. Proof. Suppose that I is a two-sided ideal in R. Let r, s ∈ I. Coset addition is well-defined, because R is an abelian group and I a normal subgroup under addition. I proved that coset addition was well-defined when I constructed quotient groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Math 412. Adventure Sheet on Quotient Groups
    Math 412. Adventure sheet on Quotient Groups Fix an arbitrary group (G; ◦). DEFINITION: A subgroup N of G is normal if for all g 2 G, the left and right N-cosets gN and Ng are the same subsets of G. NOTATION: If H ⊆ G is any subgroup, then G=H denotes the set of left cosets of H in G. Its elements are sets denoted gH where g 2 G. The cardinality of G=H is called the index of H in G. DEFINITION/THEOREM 8.13: Let N be a normal subgroup of G. Then there is a well-defined binary operation on the set G=N defined as follows: G=N × G=N ! G=N g1N ? g2N = (g1 ◦ g2)N making G=N into a group. We call this the quotient group “G modulo N”. A. WARMUP: Define the sign map: Sn ! {±1g σ 7! 1 if σ is even; σ 7! −1 if σ is odd. (1) Prove that sign map is a group homomorphism. (2) Use the sign map to give a different proof that An is a normal subgroup of Sn for all n. (3) Describe the An-cosets of Sn. Make a table to describe the quotient group structure Sn=An. What is the identity element? B. OPERATIONS ON COSETS: Let (G; ◦) be a group and let N ⊆ G be a normal subgroup. (1) Take arbitrary ng 2 Ng. Prove that there exists n0 2 N such that ng = gn0. (2) Take any x 2 g1N and any y 2 g2N. Prove that xy 2 g1g2N.
    [Show full text]
  • Quasi P Or Not Quasi P? That Is the Question
    Rose-Hulman Undergraduate Mathematics Journal Volume 3 Issue 2 Article 2 Quasi p or not Quasi p? That is the Question Ben Harwood Northern Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.rose-hulman.edu/rhumj Recommended Citation Harwood, Ben (2002) "Quasi p or not Quasi p? That is the Question," Rose-Hulman Undergraduate Mathematics Journal: Vol. 3 : Iss. 2 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholar.rose-hulman.edu/rhumj/vol3/iss2/2 Quasi p- or not quasi p-? That is the Question.* By Ben Harwood Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Northern Kentucky University Highland Heights, KY 41099 e-mail: [email protected] Section Zero: Introduction The question might not be as profound as Shakespeare’s, but nevertheless, it is interesting. Because few people seem to be aware of quasi p-groups, we will begin with a bit of history and a definition; and then we will determine for each group of order less than 24 (and a few others) whether the group is a quasi p-group for some prime p or not. This paper is a prequel to [Hwd]. In [Hwd] we prove that (Z3 £Z3)oZ2 and Z5 o Z4 are quasi 2-groups. Those proofs now form a portion of Proposition (12.1) It should also be noted that [Hwd] may also be found in this journal. Section One: Why should we be interested in quasi p-groups? In a 1957 paper titled Coverings of algebraic curves [Abh2], Abhyankar conjectured that the algebraic fundamental group of the affine line over an algebraically closed field k of prime characteristic p is the set of quasi p-groups, where by the algebraic fundamental group of the affine line he meant the family of all Galois groups Gal(L=k(X)) as L varies over all finite normal extensions of k(X) the function field of the affine line such that no point of the line is ramified in L, and where by a quasi p-group he meant a finite group that is generated by all of its p-Sylow subgroups.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development and Understanding of the Concept of Quotient Group
    HISTORIA MATHEMATICA 20 (1993), 68-88 The Development and Understanding of the Concept of Quotient Group JULIA NICHOLSON Merton College, Oxford University, Oxford OXI 4JD, United Kingdom This paper describes the way in which the concept of quotient group was discovered and developed during the 19th century, and examines possible reasons for this development. The contributions of seven mathematicians in particular are discussed: Galois, Betti, Jordan, Dedekind, Dyck, Frobenius, and H61der. The important link between the development of this concept and the abstraction of group theory is considered. © 1993 AcademicPress. Inc. Cet article decrit la d6couverte et le d6veloppement du concept du groupe quotient au cours du 19i~me si~cle, et examine les raisons possibles de ce d6veloppement. Les contributions de sept math6maticiens seront discut6es en particulier: Galois, Betti, Jordan, Dedekind, Dyck, Frobenius, et H61der. Le lien important entre le d6veloppement de ce concept et l'abstraction de la th6orie des groupes sera consider6e. © 1993 AcademicPress, Inc. Diese Arbeit stellt die Entdeckung beziehungsweise die Entwicklung des Begriffs der Faktorgruppe wfihrend des 19ten Jahrhunderts dar und untersucht die m/)glichen Griinde for diese Entwicklung. Die Beitrfi.ge von sieben Mathematikern werden vor allem diskutiert: Galois, Betti, Jordan, Dedekind, Dyck, Frobenius und H61der. Die wichtige Verbindung zwischen der Entwicklung dieses Begriffs und der Abstraktion der Gruppentheorie wird betrachtet. © 1993 AcademicPress. Inc. AMS subject classifications: 01A55, 20-03 KEY WORDS: quotient group, group theory, Galois theory I. INTRODUCTION Nowadays one can hardly conceive any more of a group theory without factor groups... B. L. van der Waerden, from his obituary of Otto H61der [1939] Although the concept of quotient group is now considered to be fundamental to the study of groups, it is a concept which was unknown to early group theorists.
    [Show full text]
  • A STUDY on the ALGEBRAIC STRUCTURE of SL 2(Zpz)
    A STUDY ON THE ALGEBRAIC STRUCTURE OF SL2 Z pZ ( ~ ) A Thesis Presented to The Honors Tutorial College Ohio University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Graduation from the Honors Tutorial College with the degree of Bachelor of Science in Mathematics by Evan North April 2015 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Background 5 2.1 Group Theory . 5 2.2 Linear Algebra . 14 2.3 Matrix Group SL2 R Over a Ring . 22 ( ) 3 Conjugacy Classes of Matrix Groups 26 3.1 Order of the Matrix Groups . 26 3.2 Conjugacy Classes of GL2 Fp ....................... 28 3.2.1 Linear Case . .( . .) . 29 3.2.2 First Quadratic Case . 29 3.2.3 Second Quadratic Case . 30 3.2.4 Third Quadratic Case . 31 3.2.5 Classes in SL2 Fp ......................... 33 3.3 Splitting of Classes of(SL)2 Fp ....................... 35 3.4 Results of SL2 Fp ..............................( ) 40 ( ) 2 4 Toward Lifting to SL2 Z p Z 41 4.1 Reduction mod p ...............................( ~ ) 42 4.2 Exploring the Kernel . 43 i 4.3 Generalizing to SL2 Z p Z ........................ 46 ( ~ ) 5 Closing Remarks 48 5.1 Future Work . 48 5.2 Conclusion . 48 1 Introduction Symmetries are one of the most widely-known examples of pure mathematics. Symmetry is when an object can be rotated, flipped, or otherwise transformed in such a way that its appearance remains the same. Basic geometric figures should create familiar examples, take for instance the triangle. Figure 1: The symmetries of a triangle: 3 reflections, 2 rotations. The red lines represent the reflection symmetries, where the trianlge is flipped over, while the arrows represent the rotational symmetry of the triangle.
    [Show full text]
  • Lie Groups in Quantum Information Session 3: Simple Lie Groups and Simple Lie Algebras
    Lie groups in quantum information Session 3: Simple Lie groups and simple Lie algebras Andrew Zhao June 26, 2019 1 Simple groups We begin with the definition of normal subgroups (sometimes also referred to as invariant subgroups). Given a particular group, these are the subgroups (recall: subsets closed with respect to the group operation) which are invariant to conjugation by any element of the full group. Definition 1.1. Let G be a group and N ⊆ G a subgroup. We call N a normal subgroup of G if, ∀n ∈ N −1 and ∀g ∈ G, gng ∈ N. (This relation is often denoted N C G.) Example 1.1. Consider the symmetric group S3 := {1, (01), (02), (12), (012), (021)}. Its normal subgroups are S3, {1}, and {1, (012), (021)}. Proof. Since groups are closed by definition, the entire group is always a normal subgroup of itself. The subgroup containing only the identity element is also always normal, since g1g−1 = gg−1 = 1 ∈ {1}. The only nontrivial normal subgroup of S3 is N = {e, (012), (021)}, which can be checked explicitly by −1 calculating gng for all g ∈ S3 and n ∈ N. As an example, for n = (012), we have: 2 0 2 (01)(012)(01)−1 = (1) 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 = 0 1 2 0 0 = = (021) ∈ N, 1 2 0 0 0 (021)(012)(021)−1 = (2) 1 2 2 1 1 2 | {z } 1 = (012) ∈ N. The remaining calculations follow similarly. Not all groups have nontrivial normal subgroups. Those which do not are said to be simple.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Quotient Groups III We Know That the Kernel of a Group Homomorphism Is a Normal Subgroup
    7. Quotient groups III We know that the kernel of a group homomorphism is a normal subgroup. In fact the opposite is true, every normal subgroup is the kernel of a homomorphism: Theorem 7.1. If H is a normal subgroup of a group G then the map γ : G −! G=H given by γ(x) = xH; is a homomorphism with kernel H. Proof. Suppose that x and y 2 G. Then γ(xy) = xyH = xHyH = γ(x)γ(y): Therefore γ is a homomorphism. eH = H plays the role of the identity. The kernel is the inverse image of the identity. γ(x) = xH = H if and only if x 2 H. Therefore the kernel of γ is H. If we put all we know together we get: Theorem 7.2 (First isomorphism theorem). Let φ: G −! G0 be a group homomorphism with kernel K. Then φ[G] is a group and µ: G=H −! φ[G] given by µ(gH) = φ(g); is an isomorphism. If γ : G −! G=H is the map γ(g) = gH then φ(g) = µγ(g). The following triangle summarises the last statement: φ G - G0 - γ ? µ G=H Example 7.3. Determine the quotient group Z3 × Z7 Z3 × f0g Note that the quotient of an abelian group is always abelian. So by the fundamental theorem of finitely generated abelian groups the quotient is a product of abelian groups. 1 Consider the projection map onto the second factor Z7: π : Z3 × Z7 −! Z7 given by (a; b) −! b: This map is onto and the kernel is Z3 ×f0g.
    [Show full text]
  • Groups with Preassigned Central and Central Quotient Group*
    GROUPS WITH PREASSIGNED CENTRAL AND CENTRAL QUOTIENT GROUP* BY REINHOLD BAER Every group G determines two important structural invariants, namely its central C(G) and its central quotient group Q(G) =G/C(G). Concerning these two invariants the following two problems seem to be most elementary. If A and P are two groups, to find necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of a group G such that A and C(G), B and Q(G) are isomorphic (existence problem) and to find necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of an isomorphism between any two groups G' and G" such that the groups A, C(G') and C(G") as well as the groups P, Q(G') and Q(G") are isomorphic (uniqueness problem). This paper presents a solution of the exist- ence problem under the hypothesis that P (the presumptive central quotient group) is a direct product of (a finite or infinite number of finite or infinite) cyclic groups whereas a solution of the uniqueness problem is given only un- der the hypothesis that P is an abelian group with a finite number of genera- tors. There is hardly any previous work concerning these problems. Only those abelian groups with a finite number of generators which are central quotient groups of suitable groups have been characterized before, t 1. Before enunciating our principal results (in §2) some notation and con- cepts concerning abelian groups will have to be recorded for future reference. If G is any abelian group, then the composition of the elements in G is denoted as addition: x+y.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Math 571 (Abstract Algebra), Chapter Iii: Quotient Groups and Homomorphisms
    NOTES ON MATH 571 (ABSTRACT ALGEBRA), CHAPTER III: QUOTIENT GROUPS AND HOMOMORPHISMS LI LI 3.1 Definitions and examples Start from the example Z ! Z=nZ, point out the difference to the notion of a subgroup: there is no nontrivial homomorphism Z=nZ ! Z. Explain the notion “fiber". Proposition 1. Let ' : G ! H be a homomorphism of groups. (1) '(1G) = 1H . (2) '(g−1) = '(g)−1 for all g 2 G. n n (3) '(g ) = '(g) for all g 2 G; n 2 Z. (4) ker' is a subgroup of G. (5) im' is a subgroup of H. Definition 2. Let ' : G ! H be a homomorphism with kernel K. The quotient group or factor group, G=K, is the group whose elements are the fibers of ', and the group operation is: if X = '−1(a) and Y = '−1(b), then XY is defined to be '−1(ab). Remark. G=K is \the same" as im'. Definition 3. For N ≤ G and g 2 G, define gN = fgnjn 2 Ng; Ng = fngjn 2 Ng called a left coset and a right coset of N in G. Any element in a coset is called a representative. Remark. For additive group, cosets are written as g + N or N + g. Proposition 4. Let ' : G ! H be a group homomorphism and K be the kernel. Let a be an element in im' and X = '−1(a). Then (1) For any u 2 X, X = uK. (2) For any u 2 X, X = Ku. Remark. uK = Ku, i.e. uKu−1 = K. Definition 5. The element gng−1 is called the conjugate of of n by g.
    [Show full text]
  • Homomorphisms of Two-Dimensional Linear Groups Over a Ring of Stable Range One
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Journal of Algebra 303 (2006) 30–41 www.elsevier.com/locate/jalgebra Homomorphisms of two-dimensional linear groups over a ring of stable range one Carla Bardini a,∗,YuChenb a Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Milano, Italy b Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Torino, Italy Received 30 July 2004 Communicated by Efim Zelmanov Abstract Let R be a commutative domain of stable range 1 with 2 a unit. In this paper we describe the homo- morphisms between SL2(R) and GL2(K) where K is an algebraically closed field. We show that every non-trivial homomorphism can be decomposed uniquely as a product of an inner automorphism and a homomorphism induced by a morphism between R and K. We also describe the homomorphisms be- tween GL2(R) and GL2(K). Those homomorphisms are found of either extensions of homomorphisms from SL2(R) to GL2(K) or the products of inner automorphisms with certain group homomorphisms from GL2(R) to K. © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Minimal stable range; Two-dimensional linear group; Homomorphism Introduction Let R be a commutative domain of stable range 1 and K an algebraically closed field. The main purpose of this paper is to determinate the homomorphisms from SL2(R),aswellas GL2(R),toGL2(K) provided that 2 is a unit of R. The study of homomorphisms between linear groups started by Schreier and van der Waerden in [19] where they found that the automorphisms of a general linear group GLn over com- plex number field have a “standard” form, which is the composition of an inner automorphism, * Corresponding author.
    [Show full text]