Guildford Environmental Forum Celebrates Its First 25 Years

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Guildford Environmental Forum Celebrates Its First 25 Years IN THIS ISSUE Our 25 years / The IPCC Report / Guildford in Bloom / Effingham Commoners' Day / Award for Energy4All / Making Guildford an Eco Diocese / The Year Gone By Future events on back page GUILDFORD ENVIRONMENTAL FORUM www.gefweb.org.uk DECEMBER 2018 – FEBRUARY 2019 Guildford Environmental Forum celebrates its first 25 years ON 11th OCTOBER, GUILDFORD to a packed room including the Lord ENVIRONMENTAL FORUM CELEBRATED Lieutenant of Surrey, representatives from ITS 25th ANNIVERSARY. Guildford and Woking Borough Councils, In a week when coincidentally the Surrey University. Guildford Diocese, Surrey Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Wildlife Trust, Surrey Hills AONB, Guildford Change (IPPC) released its alarming special Society, Guildford Rotary and several local report on the impacts of global warming, businesses. Apologies were received from the Forum had invited a celebrated speaker the leader, deputy leader and managing to address the prime issue of today – director of Guildford Borough Council (GBC) climate change. as well as many others who were unable to James Smith CBE, former chair of Shell attend. UK and of the Carbon Trust, proved to be As we settled back to enjoy the lecture, an admirable choice, speaking on ‘MUST the speaker, known for his commitment WE, CAN WE AND WILL WE AVOID to exploring and promoting low-carbon DANGEROUS CLIMATE CHANGE?' technologies, challenged the audience by setting an exam consisting of four 2 questions: The IPCC October 2018 report – a summary 3 How do we avoid dangerous climate change; Our human activities are estimated to emissions ceased today. The slower the rate of sea but still get the energy we need; 1 have caused approximately 1.0°C of global level rise, the greater the opportunities for us to at least cost; warming above the global average for 1900, adapt to it. and with a high likelihood of which is as warm if not warmer than the climate Limiting global warming to 1.5°C or at most was at its hottest some 12,000 years ago at the success? 6 to 2°C above 1900 levels will limit the impact on end of the Ice Age. The recent warming has terrestrial, freshwater, and coastal ecosystems, This resulted in a lively interchange of reversed a long term cooling trend lasting some views throughout the evening. enabling us to rely more on their services. thousands of years. Biodiversity will continue to decrease under the It quickly became evident that all were Global warming is likely to rise above its pressure of population growth. agreed that we must avoid dangerous 2 present increase of 1.0°C to reach 1.5°C climate change, which the IPPC report There were plenty of questions for James Smith to ponder. Limiting global warming to 1.5°C compared to between 2030 and 2052 if it continues to increase 7 2ºC will reduce the rate of increase in ocean has demonstrated as a global average policies and infrastructure, to bring this at the current rate, so we have a margin of just temperature and of loss of oxygen from the o temperature rise of more than 1.5 C about. 0.5°C to work in if we are to not to overshoot ocean. In addition the proposed reduction in above pre-industrial levels (we are It is unfortunate that the leaders at that demanding target. carbon emissions will decrease the rate of increase o already committed to a 1 C rise). The Guildford Borough Council were not Climate-related risks to the planet’s natural in ocean acidity. These changes will reduce risks speaker demonstrated, using a series of present to hear this message as the Council, 3 and human systems are higher than at present to marine biodiversity, fisheries, and marine authoritative studies and quotes, that it local businesses and residents need to work for the anticipated global warming of 1.5°C. The ecosystems. is technically possible to avoid dangerous together to reduce Guildford’s carbon risks include steadily rising sea levels, decreased To limit global warming to the 1.5°C target, availability of water for populations in arid 8 climate change provided that we use, as footprint. anthropogenic emissions of CO2 emissions must a matter of urgency, all the wide range The speaker left us with one final thought regions, added heat pressure on agricultural decline by about 45% by 2030, reaching zero plants in those same regions, an increased around 2050. of technologies available, including – MAKE IT URGENT – as the changes are incidence of severe heat-waves and forest fires, To limit global warming to below 2°C, CO renewables, nuclear, hydrogen and carbon massive and we have left it very late and coral bleaching, and ocean acidification affecting 2 9 emissions must decline by about 20% by 2030, capture and storage (CCS). Decarbonising are close to running out of time, and may the base of the food chain in places. Dry areas reaching zero around 2075. electricity is relatively straightforward but require carbon removing technologies will tend to become dryer, wet places wetter. Our heat and transport are more difficult. (‘negative carbon’). The climate doesn’t global food security will be diminished, while Pathways limiting global warming to 1.5°C the threat of forced migration will increase. The 10 with no or limited overshoot will require rapid He also quoted various studies which have a reset button and we have one shot combination of increased heat and humidity will and far-reaching transitions in energy use, land have shown that the cost, although non- at getting it right for our children and likely expand the spread of certain disease vectors use, urban development, infrastructure (including trivial, is affordable. However, both he and grandchildren. (e.g. malaria, dengue fever) north and south from transport and buildings), and industrial systems. the audience were more sceptical about the After an absorbing two hours the their current tropical to subtropical locations. The required transitions are unprecedented strength of the will to keep below the 2oC, chairman regretfully had to bring in terms of scale, but not necessarily in terms Climate models suggest how global warming let alone the 1.5oC, level. the proceedings to a close, thanking 4 of speed. They imply deep carbon emission may develop if we overshoot the 1.5C target and reductions in all sectors, multiple options It was stressed that we require both the the speaker for a thought-provoking move towards a global average warming of 2°C. will and action at global, national and local presentation setting out the challenges the for mitigation, and a substantial increase of Those global averages conceal the fact that the investments in those options. levels. We need to consume less, have a world faces. GEF will need to work hard to Arctic will warm twice or even three times as fast sufficient and visible price on carbon for all spread this message so that Guildford can as elsewhere, with a high probability of melting To reach the 1.5°C target, renewable energy 11 sources must supply 70–85% of electricity by goods, a logical, low carbon strategy based play its part. yet more Greenland ice, further raising sea level. At 2°C above 1900 levels, currently hot extremes 2050. on both price and regulation, with the right Report by Bill Kyte, photographs by Raymond Smith will be significantly exceeded, rain will be The voluntary global emissions cuts offered heavier leading to increased severe flooding in 12 by the world’s nations under the 2015 Paris currently wet areas, presently dry areas will suffer Agreement would lead to global warming of more extended droughts, freshwater supplies will about 3°C. Larger efforts are required. decline in dry regions, and higher sea levels will increase the likelihood of coastal flooding on 13 The demanding 1.5C target can only be low lying coasts. met by joint action from national and sub- national authorities, civil society, the private By 2100, global mean sea level rise may reach sector, indigenous peoples, local communities and 5 1.0 metre or more (less if the temperature individuals. International cooperation is essential rise then is 1.5°C or less). However, sea level for this target to be met. We did it for the Ozone will continue to rise well beyond 2100 even if Hole, and we can do it for the climate. The full report can be downloaded from http://report.ipcc.ch/sr15/pdf/sr15_spm_final.pdf 4 Comments from GEF's Climate Change Group 5 The GEF Climate Change Group has discussed the IPCC • We must increasingly adopt lifestyles and report on climate change [see below] and the 25th technologies that accord with “One Planet Living”. GUILDFORD IN BLOOM 2018 anniversary presentation by James Smith, and can • We should, as far as possible, ensure that our summarise its views as follows: investments are placed in “ethical funds”, which a. We totally support the key focus of our 25th should prioritise green technologies. Anniversary talk “that we must avoid dangerous e. Advice on how to achieve sustainable living for the climate change”, which the IPPC report (issued on 21st century, entitled ‘Transformation is Feasible’ 8th October, 2018) has demonstrated requires a was also published in October, by the Stockholm temperature rise of no more than 1.5oC above pre- Resilience Centre, as an update to the 1972 Club industrial levels. of Rome report ‘Limits to Growth’. It supports the b. We also fully endorse James Smith’s emphasis that thrusts of James Smith’s talk, and of the October we must MAKE IT URGENT as the changes are reports of the IPCC and the Royal Society.
Recommended publications
  • T Clandon Parish Council
    CLANDON PARISH COUNCIL ChairmanWE, : ;T Mr Terence Patrick , Stoney Royd, Woodstock, West Clandon, Guildford, GU4 7UJ Clerk: Mr John Stone, Hunters End, Lime Grove, West Clandon, Guildford GU4 7UT 01483 385187: [email protected] : www.westclandon.org.uk Tracy Coleman Director of Planning and Regeneration Guildford Borough Council Millmead House Millmead Guildford, Surrey GU24BB 13'*^ March 2019 Dear Ms Coleman, Application for Designation of the Civil Parish of West Clandon as a Neighbourhood Area. In accordance with the provisions of the Localism Act 2011 and the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 Section 5, West Clandon Parish Council formally apply to Guildford Borough Council as the Planning Authority to designate the Civil Parish of West Clandon as a Neighbourhood Area, in accordance with Regulation 5 of the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 ("The Regulations"). Map- Attached herewith is a map showing the Civil Parish of West Clandon as required by the Regulations. The Regulations also require the following two statements in support of this application. Statement 1 Why the Parish of West Clandon is appropriate to be designated as a Neighbourhood Area. The Village of West Clandon is at the heart of the Parish located in the County of Surrey four miles to the East of Guildford. The Parish Council has been in continuous operation since 1889 and is one of 24 parishes within the Borough of Guildford. At the last census the population was recorded as 1363. Significant development is proposed both within the parish boundaries and adjacent areas under the auspices of the Guildford Local Plan. The Parish Council wishes to play an active role in ensuring new developments are well planned and integrated into the local area and serve the interests of residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Proposals for New Parliamentary Constituency Boundaries in the South East Region Contents
    Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in the South East region Contents Summary 3 1 What is the Boundary Commission for England? 5 2 Background to the 2018 Review 7 3 Initial proposals for the South East region 11 Initial proposals for the Berkshire sub-region 12 Initial proposals for the Brighton and Hove, East Sussex, 13 Kent, and Medway sub-region Initial proposals for the West Sussex sub-region 16 Initial proposals for the Buckinghamshire 17 and Milton Keynes sub-region Initial proposals for the Hampshire, Portsmouth 18 and Southampton sub-region Initial proposals for the Isle of Wight sub-region 20 Initial proposals for the Oxfordshire sub-region 20 Initial proposals for the Surrey sub-region 21 4 How to have your say 23 Annex A: Initial proposals for constituencies, 27 including wards and electorates Glossary 53 Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in the South East region 1 Summary Who we are and what we do Our proposals leave 15 of the 84 existing constituencies unchanged. We propose The Boundary Commission for England only minor changes to a further 47 is an independent and impartial constituencies, with two wards or fewer non -departmental public body which is altered from the existing constituencies. responsible for reviewing Parliamentary constituency boundaries in England. The rules that we work to state that we must allocate two constituencies to the Isle The 2018 Review of Wight. Neither of these constituencies is required to have an electorate that is within We have the task of periodically reviewing the requirements on electoral size set out the boundaries of all the Parliamentary in the rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Contaminated Land Strategy
    GUILDFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL CONTAMINATED LAND INSPECTION STRATEGY OCTOBER 2001 Adrian Maunders Director of Housing and Health Services Strategy prepared by: Housing and Health Services Guildford Borough Council Gary Durrant Millmead House Principal Environmental Health Officer Millmead Guildford Borough Council Guildford 01483 444373 Surrey, GU2 4BB [email protected] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Guildford Borough Council is required to produce a strategy for the inspection of its district for contaminated land. This is then to be submitted to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs by July 2001, under the provisions of Part IIA of the Environmental Protection Act 1990. The priorities for dealing with contaminated land are aimed primarily at protecting human and animal health, controlled waters and ecosystems. In addition to these, prevention of damage to property and further contamination are included along with encouragement to voluntarily remediate brownfield sites. A five-year programme of inspection was commenced in April 2001 to run until April 2006. It is in 6 stages and based on a category system. Priority is given to land in areas of population and controlled waters and the final category being in undeveloped areas including the Green Belt. Sites that require urgent attention, whether through complaint or new information coming to light, will be dealt with immediately under procedures outlined in this strategy. Before land can be formally designated as contaminated it has to meet certain criteria, however once this has been attained, the information will be kept on a public register to be accessible during office hours. Guildford Borough Council will work in partnership with all other organisations and consultees specified within the guidance notes on this document and at every stage of the inspection process.
    [Show full text]
  • Honorary Freemen of the Borough of Guildford
    Honorary Freemen of the Borough of Guildford Introduction In past centuries, admission to the Freedom of a Borough conferred upon the recipient possession of recognisable privileges. In order to carry out certain trades or professions in a particular Borough, one had to be enrolled as a freeman and admission to the freedom was frequently necessary in order to have a vote in parliamentary elections. To become a freeman of Guildford, one had to be: (a) apprenticed to a freeman of the Borough for at least seven years, or (b) the eldest son of a freeman, or (c) by admission into the “Corporation”. Records kept in the Guildford Muniment Room contain the names of 1,061 persons admitted to the freedom of the Borough between 1655 and 1933 and also record the production of indentures of apprenticeship between 1655 and 1903. Typical entries in the two volumes of Borough Records known as the Freemen’s Books are reproduced below: 39. BARRETT, John, of Ockley. Appr. by ind. 7 Nov. 1796 to Jos. Jennings of H.T., plumber and glazier, Jos Jennings having died. Adm. 10 Oct 1803. (Jos. Jennings was one of the Society of Bailiffs.) 2/41. 2/43. 2/101. 3/1 52. BAVERSTOCK, John, son of Wm. road-surveyor. Appr. Wm.Elkins, brewer and one of the Aldermen, by ind. 6 Jan. 1826, for 7 yrs from that date, “to learn the Art of a Brewer’s Clerk”, Adm. 14 Oct. 1833. 2/80. 2/133 186. COBBETT, Wm., of High St., G., son of Wm. of Littleton, St.N.
    [Show full text]
  • West Sussex Discounted / Free Travel: Burgess Hill Saver Tickets: • Children Under 5 Travel Free
    Company wide items: West Sussex Discounted / Free Travel: Burgess Hill Saver Tickets: • Children under 5 travel free. Adult: Child: Day Ticket: £3.60 £1.80 • Child Tickets can be issued to those aged 5- Weekly Ticket: £14.00 £7.00 15 years old inclusive. Valid for 7 days including the date of issue. Valid on all services in the Burgess Hill area. Haywards Heath Saver Tickets: Adult: Child: Day Ticket: £4.20 £2.10 Weekly Ticket: £16.00 £8.00 Weekly - Valid for 7 days including the date of issue. Valid on all services in the Haywards Heath area. Steyning Grammar School Flat Rate Fares: Adult: Child/Student: Discovery Tickets Single Ticket: £5.60 £2.80 Valid only on the date issued: Return Ticket: £10.00 £5.00 Adult: £9.00 Weekly Ticket: £40.00 £20.00 Child: £7.20 Weekly - Valid for 7 days including the date of issue. Family:* £17.50 *Up to 2 Adults and up to 3 Children. WS Student Tickets • Anyone aged 16-19, with a valid form of I.D. to prove their age, is eligible to buy standard National Travel Tokens tickets at the Discounted price, so long as Valid currency on all routes. their journey either starts or ends in West Sussex. Compass Rover Adult: Child: Weekly Ticket: £28.00 £14.00 Weekly - Valid for 7 days including the date of issue. Not valid or sold on the following services: 107, 141, 428, 615, 625, 662, 668, 740 and 743. Company wide items: East Sussex Discounted / Free Travel: The Weekly East Sussex Freedom Ticket: • Children under 5 travel free.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions Designation (No
    Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2020 No. 946 ROAD TRAFFIC, ENGLAND The Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions Designation (No. 2) Order 2020 Made - - - - 2nd September 2020 Laid before Parliament 8th September 2020 Coming into force - - 29th September 2020 This Order is made in exercise of the powers conferred by paragraph 8(1) of Part 2 of Schedule 8 and paragraph 3(1) of Schedule 10 to the Traffic Management Act 2004(1). Hampshire County Council, East Sussex County Council, the Council of the City of Stoke-on-Trent and Surrey County Council have each applied to the Secretary of State for an order to be made in exercise of those powers, in respect of part of its respective area. The Secretary of State has consulted the Chief Constables of the Hampshire, East Sussex, Staffordshire and Surrey Police, in accordance with the requirements of paragraph 8(3) of Part 2 of Schedule 8 and paragraph 3(4) of Schedule 10 to that Act. Accordingly, the Secretary of State(2) makes this Order. Citation and commencement 1. This Order may be cited as the Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions Designation (No. 2) Order 2020 and comes into force on 29th September 2020. Interpretation 2. In this Order— “grid reference” means Ordnance Survey National Grid reference point; and “strategic road network” means the highways for which Highways England Company Limited(3) is the highway authority by virtue of the Appointment of a Strategic Highways Company Order 2015(4).
    [Show full text]
  • Guildford/Mole Valley
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. - 37 Principal Area Boundary Review BOROUGH OF GU LDFORD D SIR CT OF MOLE VALLEY U)CAL GOVEHNMOiT BOUNDARY COMMISSION J'OH ENGLAND REPORT NO. 537 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Mr G J Ellerton CMC MBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J G Powell FRICS FSVA MEMBERS Lady Ackner Mr G R Prentice Professor G E Cherry Mr K J L Newell Mr B Scholes QBE THE RIGHT HON NICHOLAS RIDLEY MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT PRINCIPAL AREA BOUNDARY REVIEW : THE BOROUGH OF GUILDFORD AND THE DISTRICT OF MOLE VALLEY BACKGROUND 1. In a letter dated 20 December 1985 your predecessor as Secretary of State for the Environment notified us of his decision not to give effect to our proposals to transfer part of Woodlands Road from the unparished area of the district of Mole Valley to the parish of Effingham, in the borough .of Guildford (both districts being in the non-metropolitan county of Surrey)- Your predecessor noted that part of Woodlands Road is already in Effingham, and all of it, including the area concerned in our proposals, is separated by a stretch of open country from the built-up area of Great Bookham. He cc^.-sr.^ed further that the village of Effingham is, however, itself separated from other places in the borough of Guildford by open country, and parts of it closely adjoin development on the edge of Little Bookham. The Chief Executive of Mole valley District Council, in a letter to us had referred to earlier local government connections between Effingham and Dorking and your predecessor did not consider that the possibility that Effingham, or part of it, had a greater community of interest with the Bookhams, Leatherhead and Mole Valley had been fully tested in the review.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 4^ 7 LOCAL GOTEEDMHT BOUNDARY OOJMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO. ^" 3 7 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNMHY COMMISSIOH FOR ENGLAND CHAIBMAH Mr G J Ellerton CMS MBE IEPTJTT CHATRMAN Sir Wilfred Burns CB CBE MEMBERS Lftdj Ackner Mr T BrockUnk DL Mr D P Harrison Professor G E Cherry T3I1 3T. HCS. PATRICK J2KKIN UP SECRETARY OF STATE ?03 THE EKVI30KK2IT *. In their parish review report subnitted to us on 16 June iV80f Guildford Borough Council suggested changes to parts of ths boundary between the Borough, of Cuildford ?.r.d the Boroughs of Surrey Heath, Poking and Elmbridge, and Districts of Hole Valley and T7averley in the Coi-nty of Surrey, and the Borough of 3ushmoor in the County of Hacipahire in the following parishad and unparished areas:- Ash Parish, Guildford/Surrey Heath Borough Pirbright Parish, Guildford/Surroy Eeath Borough Pirbright Parish, Guildi'ord/tfokinc Borough Ockha-n Parisii, Guildfcrd/Elcbridge Borough Effin^haa Parish, Guildford/r.role Valley District East I'.orsley Parish, Guildford/Abinger Parish, Kole Valley Shere Parish, Guildford/Abinter Parish, Hole Valley Shere Parish, Guildford/Ev/hurst Parish, Vfaverley District Albury Parish, Cuildford/V.'onersh Parish, V/averley r:halfor;l parish, Guildford/Bcamley Parish, TTaverley Shalford Parish, Guildford/Godalming Parish, 77averley Coinpton Parish, Guildford/Godalmir.g Parish, '.V-: verley Shackleford Parish, Guildford/Goclaiming Parish, i7a*/erley ShaclQeford Parish, Guildford/Witley Parish, ";7averley Seale and Tongham Parish, Guildford/Elstead Parisl;, /teverley Seale and Toafjham Parish, GuildTord/Tilford Parish, VTaverley Seale and Tonghaa Parish, Guildford/7averley District Ash Parish, Guilclford, Surrey/Rushooor Borough, Eaapshlre ^ ;2.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Footcare Services Food Support
    Transport Care for Guildford Good neighbour scheme serving the old borough of Guildford: the town centre, Onslow Village, Park Barn, Burpham, Merrow and Stoughton. They provide transport to GP surgeries, clinics, dentists and hospitals. They also do shopping on behalf of someone and do small one off jobs in the home like putting up shelves or changing light bulbs. Tel: 01483 566 635. Lines are open Monday-Friday: 9am-1pm and 2pm-4pm Guildford Community Transport (provided by Guildford Borough Council) Provides a variety of services to residents such as dial a ride, door to store, social trips and transport to social centres for older people. They help those who can't easily use public transport, including those who are: over 60 years of age of any age but have a physical disability or mobility problem of any age but are suffering short or long term ill health of any age but have learning difficulties of any age but have mental health issues Tel: 01483 458052 or Email: [email protected] Footcare Services Private Chiropodist This a private chiropodist; her name is Vida Bonell. Vida runs appointments on Tuesdays. She is able to do more involved treatments. You can contact her directly to book an appointment or discuss pricings (this is currently approximately £27.00). Tel: 07941 994878 Email: [email protected] Age UK Footcare Service Provides basic foot care such as nail cutting and giving advice. The appointments are currently £16.00 each and are held at the Park Barn Centre, Guildford and St John’s Church, Merrow.
    [Show full text]
  • 9358 the LONDON GAZETTE, 25Ra AUGUST 1966
    9358 THE LONDON GAZETTE, 25ra AUGUST 1966 (2) 21 High Street and Sherborne House, Hoddesdon, (6) 25 Charles Street, Epping, Essex, by E. J. Herts, by Hoddesdon Motor Company Limited. and K. A. Dedman, 106 Sandown Road, (3) 2 Postwood Green, Hertford Heath, Herts, by Shanklin, Isle of Wight, Hants. A. W. and E. Berry of that address. (7) Land at rear of Dalehurst, Gaylands, The Bays (4) 56 Longmeadow, Bedgrove, Aylesbury, Bucks, by and Aran, Branksome Avenue, Stanford-le- Lavells Limited. Hope, Essex, by Oakbridge Development Com- (5) 73, 75 and 77 Marl Pit Lane, Norwich, Norfolk, pany Limited. by F. E. Sawyer (Property) Limited. (8) Land at rear of 46 Atlantic Road, Brixton, (6) Land to N. of Westgate, Peterborough, Northants, London S.W.2, by The Prudential Assurance by J. Charkham, 11 The Rise, Edgware, Middx. Company Limited. (7) Land adjoining Ver Road, Redbourn, Herts, by (9) 6 Worthington Way, Lexden, Colchester, Essex, Burtsa Property Company Limited. by Beecham Group Limited. (10) 79 Branksome Avenue, Stanford-le-Hope, Essex, by C. G. and G. J. McWilliams of that ad- THE TUNBRIDGE WELLS DISTRICT LAND REGISTRY, dress. (11) 16 Cambridge Road, Anerley, London S.E.20, Tunbridge Welis, Kent. by H. J. Hughes of that address. (12) Greenfields, Church Lane, Springfield, Chelms- FREEHOLD ford, Essex, by T. A. Buckingham of that (1) Torwode, Ruxbury Road, Chertsey, Surrey, by address. J. S. Thomson of that address. (13) Land at rear of 49 and 51 Aylesbury Drive, (2) Land formerly known as Priory Mill and land Holland-on-Sea, Essex, by Seven Sisters (Ayles- adjoining, Tonbridge, Kent, by Wallace & bury) Properties Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape SPD
    Supplementary Planning Document Mole Valley Local Plan Landscape SPD July 2013 This document can be made available in large print, on audio cassette, in Braille and in other languages Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Policy Context 3 3 Using the Landscape SPD 5 4 The Landscape of Mole Valley - An Overview 11 5 Character Profiles 21 5.1 Thames Basin Lowlands 23 5.1.1 Character Profile: Esher and Epsom 24 5.1.2 Character Profile: Ockham and Clandon 26 5.1.3 Character Profile: Lower Mole 29 5.2 North Downs 31 5.2.1 Character Profile: Box Hill 33 5.2.2 Character Profile: Mole Gap 37 5.2.3 Character Profile: Ranmore and Hackhurst Downs 40 5.3 Wealden Greensand 42 5.3.1 Character Profile: Holmesdale 43 5.3.2 Character Profile: Pippbrook and Tillingbourne 46 5.3.3 Character Profile: Reigate Greensand 49 5.3.4 Character Profile: Leith Hill Greensand 51 5.4 Low Weald 54 5.4.1 Character Profile: Open Weald 55 5.4.2 Character Profile: Wooded Weald 57 6 Glossary and Sources of Further Information 61 1 Appendices 62 Mole Valley District Council Mole Valley Local Development Framework Landscape SDP Contents Mole Valley Local Development Framework Landscape SDP Mole Valley District Council 1 Introduction Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 The landscape of Mole Valley is cherished by its residents and visitors alike. Large extents are protected through European, National and local designations. Substantial areas are owned or managed by organisations whose focus is primarily conservation and informal recreation, such as the National Trust and the Surrey Wildlife Trust.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Delivery Plan
    Contents What is an Infrastructure Delivery Plan? 3 Background 3 The Policy Context 3 Planning Infrastructure Contributions 4 Planned Development 5 Assessing Existing and Future Needs 6 Infrastructure Position 7 Physical Infrastructure Strategic Road Network 22 Local Highway Network 23 Rail 27 Transport Bus 29 Community Transport 30 Walking & Cycling 32 Energy Gas & Electricity 34 Water Supply 36 Water Waste Water 40 Waste & Recycling Waste & Recycling 42 Broadband & Broadband & Telecommunications 44 Telecommunications Green Infrastructure Provision for Children and Young People 45 Sports Pitches 48 Open Space 50 Green Thames Basin Heaths SPA Avoidance Strategy 59 Wealden Heaths SPA – Hindhead Avoidance 61 Strategy Flood Infrastructure 63 Social and Community Infrastructure Leisure Indoor Leisure Facilities 64 Early Years Provision 66 Education Primary & Secondary 67 Higher & Further Education 69 Commissioners, Provision of NHS Services, 71 Secondary and Community Health Care provision Health & Social Care Primary Health Care 75 Social Care 77 Libraries 78 Community Services Community Facilities inc. Day Centres, Village 78 Halls Fire and Rescue 79 Emergency Services Ambulance 80 Police 81 Delivery 82 Infrastructure Delivery Schedule 83 1 Figures and Tables Figures Page Figure 1 Map showing main settlements and the road and rail 24 networks in Waverley Figure 2 Indicative Energy Supply Boundaries 36 Figure 3 Indicative Water Supply Coverage 40 Figure 4 Indicative Wastewater Catchment Areas 42 Figure 5 Accessibility to Facilities for Children
    [Show full text]