Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Home , Borough of Guildford, Borough of Runnymede, Gatton Park, Guildford bus station, Thorpe Interchange

S Transport for Surrey

CUMULATIVE ASSESSMENT OF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS ON THE HIGHWAY NETWORK

Final Report

Project Title: Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Document Title: Final Report

Client Reference:

Date: 06 September 2011

Prepared By: Print Emma Brundle

Sign ......

Authorised By: Print Steve Howard

Sign ......

Amendment List Iss. / Rev. Iss. / Rev Remove Insert Date Page Iss. / Rev. Page Iss. / Rev. 1 4/7/11 Final 5/9/11

0201SF10 07/08/02 Filename: I:\EAI\SY all\Economy Team\02. Infrastructure\02. CIL\03 County Council workstreams\SICP\Cumulative Assessment - Final Report.docc

Issue No.Final Page 2 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 1 INTRODUCTION 8 1.1 Background 8 1.2 Aims and Objectives 9 1.3 Scope 9 1.4 Report Structure 10 2 MODEL DESCRIPTION 11 2.1 Context 11 2.2 Vehicle Types 11 2.3 Time Period 11 2.4 Assignment Method 11 2.5 Zoning System 12 2.6 Study Area 12 3 ESTIMATION OF TRIP RATES 14 3.1 Trip Generation 14 3.2 Planning Data & TRICS Trip Generation 14 3.3 TEMPRO Trip Generation 16 4 SCENARIOS AND FORECAST MATRICES 17 4.1 Modelled Scenarios 17 4.2 Additional Trips 17 4.3 Largest Increases in Trips 21 4.4 Forecast Matrices 29 5 MODELLING RESULTS 36 5.1 Summary Network Statistics 36 5.2 Strategic Route Network Journey Times 38 5.3 Cost of Congestion compared to Volume/Capacity Ratio 43 5.4 Volume/Capacity Ratio 49 5.5 Difference in Flow 57 5.6 Merge and Diverge Assessment of the SRN 66 6 CONCLUSION 70 6.1 Context 70 6.2 Traffic Impacts on the SRN in Surrey 71 6.3 Traffic Impacts on the LRN of Surrey 72 6.4 Summary of Impacts 73 6.5 Conclusions 74 6.6 Limitations of Study 75

Issue No.Final Page 3 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Surrey Infrastructure Capacity Project (SICP) is an exciting and innovative initiative. The project was set up to establish infrastructure planning to help manage the housing, employment, population and economic growth planned for Surrey between now and 2026. The project allows Surrey County Council to assess current and future countywide infrastructure requirements alongside the 11 district and borough councils, Surrey Police, Surrey Primary Care Trust, the business community and other key infrastructure and service providers including transport, utilities, education and health.

The project was also a response to the strong perception that Surrey has developed without adequate infrastructure, resulting in a deficit in provision in some parts of the county. This is because growth has spread unevenly across Surrey leading to increased pressure on certain areas. The situation has not been helped by the pattern of housing development, which has traditionally been delivered on small sites that do not attract associated infrastructure provision, leading to a cumulative strain on existing facilities and services

This ‘Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network’ study was undertaken to consider the cumulative impacts of all known future development within Surrey, as well as large developments located externally to the County, with respect to highway capacity, to the likely additional traffic generated by committed and non- committed planned residential and commercial development, as proposed in the emerging Core Strategies of the Local Development Frameworks for the borough and districts in and around Surrey.

The main aims of the cumulative transport assessment were to:

• Evaluate the highway capacity impacts of the cumulative county-wide strategic development within Surrey and large developments external to Surrey; • Assist in assessing the sensitivity of both the Strategic Route Network (SRN) and Local Road Network (LRN), including classified A and B roads to satisfy the Highways Agency (HA) responsible for the SRN, and Surrey County Council (SCC) the designated highway authority for the LRN, on the ability of the highway network to cope with the predicted future traffic demand; • Assist in identifying specific locations which may require additional infrastructure provision for transport services; • And contribute towards the development and adoption of a costed strategic infrastructure schedule at a county-wide level.

The main objectives of the cumulative transport assessment were to:

• Identify the amounts and locations of additional commercial and residential development in Surrey and the large developments external to the County; • Calculate the distribution of vehicle trips resulting from the additional development; • Forecast the traffic impacts of individual developments on the SRN and LRN; • Act as a starting point for identifying locations which may either require additional infrastructure provision for transport services or further study to identify appropriate mitigation measures; • Report the likely highway capacity impacts on both SRN and LRN.

The main benefit of this approach was to ensure that any strategic infrastructure requirements identified could be used to support the districts and boroughs needs to produce local Infrastructure Delivery Plans (IDP) using a common and consistent strategic

Issue No.Final Page 4 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

evidence base. This evidence base could also be used to support future bids for Central Government funding for transport infrastructure and services.

The transport assessment used the strategic Surrey County Transport Model (SINTRAM V4.1) in conjunction with the OmniTRANS modelling software suite to evaluate highway capacity impacts on both the SRN and LRN, at present SINTRAM is unable to accurately assess queuing and individual driver behaviour at junctions or assess the provision of Public Transport such as bus and rail. SINTRAM encapsulates the detailed road network, including key junction for Surrey and surrounding local authorities and has been developed to meet the requirements of the Department of Transport (DfT) modelling guidance (WebTAG).

The SINTRAM model assess link capacity and therefore indicates which road sections are likely to experience delays as a result of traffic demand exceeding capacity with a consequent reduction in vehicle speeds. It can also indicate how traffic diverts away from busy routes (i.e. re-distribution effects), where traffic is slowed because of excessive demand, and adds to flows on secondary routes that may be less suitable and hence more sensitive to changes in flows. Thus making it a reasonable tool to assess the impacts of future development at a strategic county-wide level.

The transport assessment is currently based on an average AM peak hour (0700-1000) and includes a base year of 2011 and a forecast year of 2026.

The following scenarios have been included in this assessment: • 2011 Base; • 2026 Do-Nothing (includes growth for all of Great Britain, except Surrey and external developments, defined as the study area for this assessment); • 2026 Do-Something (includes growth for all areas).

Main Outcomes

Analysis of the available planning data suggests that in the 2026 Do-Something scenario the modelled zone in Surrey to incur the largest amount of estimated additional departure trips is zone 379 Ottershaw (Runnymede) with a projected increase of 758 departure trips. Whereas zone 383 Addlestone Moor (Runnymede) is projected to gain the largest amount of estimated additional arrival trips, 282 trips. Explanation as to why zone 379 Ottershaw is estimated to incur the largest amount of departure trips is related to the redevelopment of the former Defence Evaluation and Research Agency (DERA) site, that is located in close proximity to the zone in Runnymede. Modelled zones in the borough of Reigate and Banstead are predicted to incur the largest proportion of additional trips in the 2026 Do- Something, compared to all other Surrey borough/districts.

The main outcomes of this cumulative assessment are based on aggregations of modelled outputs from network summary statistics including vehicle kilometrage, travel times and average speeds and the relationships between them. Detailed analysis has been undertaken on the SRN by comparing journey times. Known congestion ‘bottlenecks’ have been assessed by comparing current cost of congestion data against volume capacity ratio plots. Traffic flow and congestion impacts between scenarios have been ranked for both the SRN and LRN and finally a highway capacity assessment has been undertaken on several motorway merges and diverges.

The main results for both the SRN and LRN are summarised in the table below. The table is based on the greatest changes in flow, density and speed between 2026 Do-Something and 2026 Do Nothing modelled scenarios.

Issue No.Final Page 5 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Criteria SRN LRN • M3 Junction 4 to 1 (specifically • A23 corridor Journey Time Junction 3 to 2) • A320 corridor • M25 Junctions 13 to 14 • Horley Rd/ Mill Ln, westbound (Reigate & • M3 Junctions 4 to 1 Banstead) Volume/Capacity • A3 from Ripley to M25 Wisley • Chobham Ln, Trumps Green Rd and Ratio Interchange Stroude Rd, northbound (Runnymede) • A245/B382 Old Woking Rd, westbound (Woking) • M25 Junction 11 to 13 • B386 Holloway Hill, Green Ln, eastbound • M25 J13 to 11 (Runnymede) • M23 J10 to 8 • Chobham Rd, Trumps Green Rd and Difference in Stroude Rd, northbound (Runnymede) Flow • A245/B382 Old Woking Rd, westbound (Woking) • A331 Blackwater Valley Route, northbound (Surrey Heath)

The table above highlights sections of both the SRN and LRN within Surrey that are sensitive to reasonably significant increases in traffic flow, exacerbating and prolonging existing levels of congestion, resulting in reduced levels of service and reduced journey time reliability during the am peak hour for local roads in and around urban areas and on the approaches and along the mainline of the SRN.

The analysis suggests that although major additional highway capacity infrastructure investment such as motorway widening, or local bypasses is not necessary to meet the demands of future development, other types of highway capital schemes in some urban areas, at key junctions and other sensitive locations will be required in order to promote and manage the additional demand due to the future development. These schemes will not necessarily create additional capacity but which will assist in managing or improving journey time reliability and levels of service by managing the impacts to ensure congestion - both delay and journey time reliability - does not deteriorate beyond current levels.

Given that providing additional capacity is no longer considered to be the best solution except in certain locations and for particular circumstances, a mix of solutions will be required involving a wide range of tools. This mix of solutions includes demand management, integrated land use & transport planning, network management, traffic management, freight & goods management and behavioural change. Many of these solutions are contained within Surrey’s recently adopted Surrey Transport Plan (STP3) which include strategies and associated toolkits to provide adequate mitigation measures and assist in the formulation of robust Infrastructure Delivery Plans.

The results and analysis of this cumulative assessment of future development impacts in Surrey, have been presented and endorsed by the ‘Surrey Infrastructure Project Board’ in July 2011.

Limitations of Study

Given the strategic nature of the highway capacity assessment and modelling methodology used there are a number of limitations which need to be considered during the preparation and interpretation of the highway capacity impacts on both the SRN and LRN within this report which are set out below.

Issue No.Final Page 6 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

The results presented in this report are based on local planning estimates from the emerging Core Strategies of the boroughs and districts, which are all at different stages within the LDF process, and are based on estimates available as of February 2010, hence, any future changes to the size and distribution of housing and commercial provision may alter the impacts and interpretation of the analysis of this assessment.

The limitations of the planning estimates (such as the varying degrees of available planning data internally and external to Surrey and the uncertainty of the size, distribution and land-use of any future planned developments) the interpretation of the likely impacts on both the SRN and LRN within this assessment should be treated as broad strategic projections, and as such further work would be recommended, (including complementary analysis using appropriate modelling \ assessment tools), to further assist in the identification of additional infrastructure needs and other potential mitigation measures at a more local and detailed level.

The cumulative county-wide transport assessment assumes that all the committed and non-committed planned estimates of development would occur simultaneously and that any impacts described in this report do not account for any possible mitigation, demand management or infrastructure provision and effectively present a worse case situation.

Issue No.Final Page 7 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background

1.1.1 The Surrey Infrastructure Capacity Project (SICP) is an exciting and innovative initiative. The project was set up to establish infrastructure planning to help manage the housing, employment, population and economic growth planned for Surrey between now and 2026. The project allows Surrey County Council to assess current and future countywide infrastructure requirements alongside the 11 district and borough councils, Surrey Police, Surrey Primary Care Trust, the business community and other key infrastructure and service providers including transport, utilities, education and health.

1.1.2 The project was also a response to the strong perception that Surrey has developed without adequate infrastructure, resulting in a deficit in provision in some parts of the county. This is because growth has spread unevenly across Surrey leading to increased pressure on certain areas. The situation has not been helped by the pattern of housing development, which has traditionally been delivered on small sites that do not attract associated infrastructure provision, leading to a cumulative strain on existing facilities and services

1.1.3 This ‘Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network’ study was undertaken to consider the cumulative impacts of all known future development within Surrey, as well as large developments located externally to the County, with respect to highway capacity, to the likely additional traffic generated by committed and non-committed planned residential and commercial development, as proposed in the emerging Core Strategies of the Local Development Frameworks for the borough and districts in and around Surrey.

1.1.4 The aim of this project is to assess projected cumulative impacts on the strategic and local highway network in Surrey, as a result of additional traffic generated from projected future development, between 2011 and 2026.

1.1.5 The assessment takes account of all development within Surrey, as well as large development pressures located external to the County that are in close proximity to the boundary (including the borough of Rushmoor, Aldershot Urban Extension (AUE), the district of Hart, Bordon, Crawley, East Grinstead, Haywards Heath and Horsham).

1.1.6 The investigation into the cumulative impact of all such development was performed using the Strategic County Transport Model (SINTRAM).

1.1.7 SCC’s Transport Studies modelling team have previously assisted many of Surrey’s borough/districts with Transport Assessments (TA) in relation to their Local Development Frameworks (LDF) and Core Strategies (CS), using SINTRAM. The purpose of these assessments was to determine the sensitivity of the strategic and local highway network to the proposed future developments (commercial and residential) between 2005 and 2026. However, these assessments were all conducted in isolation and therefore only indicated projected highway impacts based on the individual boroughs/districts proposed developments. Such assessments have been completed for the following Surrey boroughs/districts:

• Reigate and Banstead

Issue No.Final Page 8 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

• Mole Valley • Elmbridge • Waverley • Woking • Runnymede • Surrey Heath (joint with Hampshire borough/districts of Rushmoor and Hart to create the Transport Assessment for the M3 Corridor J3 – 4a Joint LDF Study).

1.2 Aims and Objectives

1.2.1 The main aims of the cumulative transport assessment were to:

1.2.2 The main objectives of the cumulative transport assessment were to:

1.2.3 The main benefit of this approach was to ensure that any strategic infrastructure requirements identified could be used to support the districts and boroughs needs to produce local Infrastructure Delivery Plans (IDP) using a common and consistent strategic evidence base. This evidence base could also be used to support future bids for Central Government funding for transport infrastructure and services.

1.3 Scope

1.3.1 The assessment uses the strategic County transport model (SINTRAM V4.1) and OmniTRANS transport modelling software as the modelling tool in this assessment.

1.3.2 For comparison purposes a 2011 base year and 2026 Do-Nothing scenario were developed as references. This is described later in Section 4. For this element of the study, one modelled network was used throughout the assessment, and this network reflects the road network in its current state (the Hindhead Improvement

Issue No.Final Page 9 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Scheme was not modelled). Base and forecast scenario matrices were developed using trip generation derived from borough/districts planning data along with the Trip Rate Information Computer System (TRICS) database and forecasts from the Trip End Model Programme (TEMPRO).

1.3.3 The assessment only considers the impacts on highway capacity at a strategic level and as such the modelling methodology employed is unable to answer detailed questions regarding traffic interactions, such as queuing and individual driver behaviour at junctions. It does not consider other travel modes such as Public Transport including buses and rail.

1.4 Report Structure

1.4.1 This technical report describes both the methodology and highway capacity implications from the transport assessment of cumulative impacts from future development. The technical report is structured as listed below:

- Section 2: A description of the model and it’s constraints; - Section 3: The estimation of trip rates for the proposed developments and scenarios; - Section 4: The development and summary results of the forecasting methodology; - Section 5: Analysis and results of the modelling work undertaken, including network statistics, changes in traffic flow and capacity assessments; - Section 6: Main conclusions of the impacts on both the SRN and LRN and summary of evaluation.

1.4.2 To accompany this technical report, a technical annex has been produced as a separate document containing additional reference information, including:

- Appendix A: Modelled Zone Plans of Surrey Borough \ Districts - Appendix B: Origin & Destination Trip Ends for Modelled Zones in Surrey - Appendix C: Flow Charts detailing Forecasting Methodologies - Appendix D: DMRB Volume 6 Section 2 Junction Layout Geometry Guidance - Appendix E: Assessment of M25 Junctions based on DMRB Guidance

Issue No.Final Page 10 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

2 MODEL DESCRIPTION

2.1 Context

2.1.1 The County model (SINTRAM Version 4.1_SICP_110615) was used to evaluate the cumulative assessment of future development proposals. SINTRAM is a strategic model that encapsulates the road network of Surrey and surrounding local authorities; at a national level the model incorporates all strategic roads within Great Britain.

2.1.2 All motorways, A and B roads together with some local roads are explicitly modelled within SINTRAM. Where traffic junctions and traffic signals are likely to have significant effects, the details of their general layout or timing of the signals are also included in the modelling. However, strategic modelling uses aggregate descriptions of traffic such as flow, density and speed, as well as the relationships between them and hence does not include every road or junction. As a result the model is unable to answer detailed questions regarding traffic interactions, such as queuing and individual driver behaviour. It can, however, provide approximate answers to a wide range of transport problems (i.e. re- distribution effects), making it a reasonable tool for the cumulative transport assessment and assessing potential impacts on the strategic and local network within the County.

2.1.3 The SINTRAM model assesses link capacity and therefore indicates which road sections are likely to experience delays as a result of traffic demand exceeding capacity with a consequent reduction in vehicle speeds. It can also indicate how traffic diverts away from busy routes (i.e. re-distribution effects), where traffic is slowed because of excessive demand, and adds to flows on secondary routes that may be less suitable and hence more sensitive to changes in flows. Thus making it a reasonable tool for the strategic cumulative assessment of development in the County until the forecast year of 2026.

2.2 Vehicle Types

2.2.1 Cars, LGVs and HGVs are separately represented in the model. Trips by public transport are not modelled.

2.3 Time Period

2.3.1 The evaluation was performed for the average hour of the AM peak period (0700 – 1000 hours).

2.4 Assignment Method

2.4.1 A fixed matrix equilibrium assignment was performed using the Method of Successive Averages (MSA). This is an assignment using user equilibrium with optional Burrell type perturbations. The assignment allocates given travel demand (a set of trips with fixed origins and destinations) on the modelled network in order to obtain distribution of traffic flow. The resulting traffic flow represents the ‘average’ conditions for the time period under study. The assignment was performed for 80 iterations with a spreadfactor of 0.5 for all modelled scenarios.

Issue No.Final Page 11 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

2.5 Zoning System

2.5.1 SINTRAM makes use of a zoning system. Zones within Surrey are based on national census output areas, whereas zones external to the County cover larger areas and are generally less refined in comparison, (a result of being located outside the models key study area, Surrey). See Appendix A for a modelled zone plan of every borough in Surrey.

2.6 Study Area

2.6.1 The study area of this assessment covers all modelled zones within Surrey as well as zones covering large external development pressures to the County, such as the borough of Rushmoor, Bordon etc. Figure 2.1 shows all modelled zones that additional trips were incorporated to in this assessment. However, it should be noted that all modelling results and analysis presented in this report, is for the SRN and LRN within the Surrey boundaries only.

Issue No.Final Page 12 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Key Zone boundaries N of zones in study area

District of Hart

Borough of Rushmoor

East Grinstead Crawley

Bordon Horhsam

Haywards Heath

Figure 2.1: Study area defined by modelled zone boundaries (all Surrey zones and zones covering known large developments external to the County).

Issue No. Final Page 13 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

3 ESTIMATION OF TRIP RATES

3.1 Trip Generation

3.1.1 Two sources were used to establish the trip generation for the study area (all modelled zones in Surrey and zones covering specific large external developments to Surrey) included in this assessment. These sources were: • Borough/district planning data with use of TRICS (version 2010(a)); • TEMPRO (version 5.4).

3.1.2 Table 3.1 informs which source of trip generation was utilised for all areas/developments in the study area.

Area / Development Source of Trip Generation Elmbridge BC Planning data with TRICS Epsom & Ewell BC TEMPRO Guildford BC TEMPRO Mole Valley DC Planning data with TRICS Reigate & Banstead BC Planning data with TRICS Runnymede BC Planning data with TRICS Spelthorne BC TEMPRO Surrey Heath BC Planning data with TRICS Tandridge DC TEMPRO Waverley BC Planning data with TRICS Woking BC Planning data with TRICS Rushmoor BC (including AUE) Planning data with TRICS Hart DC Planning data with TRICS Bordon TEMPRO Crawley TEMPRO East Grinstead TEMPRO Haywards Heath TEMPRO Horsham TEMPRO Table 3.1: Source of trip generation for all areas/developments involved in the assessment

3.1.3 It was thought appropriate to include projected large developments that are external to Surrey but in close proximity to the County boundary in this assessment. This will ensure that any traffic impacts related to these developments that may impact upon Surrey are accounted for. It is likely that traffic generated from such large external developments will travel in/out of Surrey due to their close proximity. The developments external to Surrey that have been included in this assessment are as follows: • All developments in the borough of Rushmoor (including AUE); • All developments in the district of Hart; • Bordon • Crawley • East Grinstead • Haywards Heath • Horsham

3.2 Planning Data & TRICS Trip Generation

3.2.1 As SCC has previously been involved in a number of the County’s borough/districts LDFs, current and future planning was readily available.

Issue No. Final Page 14 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

3.2.2 Planning data was available for seven of the eleven County’s boroughs which detailed the committed and planned commercial and residential developments from 2005 to 2026.

3.2.3 The planning data contained two key categories of development: commercial and residential. It reflects the borough/districts estimates of development to occur between 2005 and 2026. Details of these estimated developments were also provided, including the estimated location and size of developments.

3.2.4 The planning data provided details of whether each development had been committed by planning permission or not. Status of planning permission affects the implications of developments because it is not possible to influence the developments that have received planning permission. However, the planning data did not detail the years that the developments occurred or are proposed to occur. Due to this it was assumed that all committed developments was dated between 2005 and 2011, whereas all non-committed planned developments was dated between 2011 and 2026.

3.2.5 Development trip rates were obtained from TRICS with use of the planning data. A trip rate refers to the amount of trips generated by a development. These include both trips that arrive and depart from a development.

3.2.6 The TRICS database stores information recorded from past surveys completed in the UK for a range of locations and land uses, counting the number of vehicular trips made to and from individual sites. The TRICS database allows users to select sites that are relevant and similar in criteria to a development site in question. This enables the estimation of trip rates to and from proposed developments based on past surveyed sites.

3.2.7 It should be noted that TRICS is a ‘subjective tool’. This is because personal choice and judgement plays a key role in decision making when choosing appropriate sites to compare with the existing and proposed developments.

3.2.8 TRICS Good Practice Guide 2009 was followed for the interrogation of the database to determine comparative sites.

3.2.9 Trip rates produced from the TRICS database were calculated as a trip rate estimate per 100m² gross floor area (GFA) for commercial developments, and per household for residential developments. Estimates were then applied to the relevant (GFA) or number of households for each development, by modelled zone.

3.2.10 Trip rate estimates were generated for both the existing and proposed developments (where possible due to data limitations) using the TRICS database. Therefore it was possible to calculate the additional amount of trips per development by deducting the existing trip rate from the proposed.

3.2.11 Three vehicles types are modelled within SINTRAM: Cars, LGVs and HGVs. Consequently vehicle proportions were calculated for these vehicle types from the corresponding surveys in the TRICS database.

3.2.12 Whilst different trip rates were generated for each category of development for each land use, trip rates also needed to be extracted to appropriate corresponding (TRICS) locations. The (TRICS) database classifies all surveys conducted at a development as one of the following:

Issue No. Final Page 15 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

• town centre; • edge of town centre; • neighbourhood centre; • suburban area; • edge of town and • free standing.

3.2.13 The methodology for assigning a TRICS location to each development differed between the developments, depending whether detailed locations were provided in the planning data. The developments that provided addresses for each development had a precise TRICS location assigned. Whereas, the developments that did not have precise locations were awarded a TRICS location based on the entire or proportion of the relevant modelled zone. TRICS locations were defined by use of local knowledge and aerial photography.

3.2.14 The planning data utilised in this assessment is the same as what was used previously in the individual borough/districts assessments. Therefore the planning data may not be as recent for some boroughs, but due to time constraints it was not feasible to re-visit all boroughs and ask for a re-evaluation of the planning data. This is also the reason why it was not possible to utilise detailed planning data for all other areas/developments in the study area.

3.3 TEMPRO Trip Generation

3.3.1 At the time of this cumulative assessment being conducted SCC did not possess planning data for the entire study area of the assessment. Planning data was absent for four of SCC borough/districts (Guildford, Epsom and Ewell, Spelthorne and Tandridge) and all external developments to the County with exception to the borough of Rushmoor and district of Hart. Therefore it was not possible to calculate the estimated amount trip rates for all areas involved in the study area by use of TRICS. Therefore TEMPRO forecasts were used for trip generation in zones where planning data was not available.

3.3.2 TEMPRO (version 5.4) was used to extract the trip generation for a 2026 forecast. TEMPRO forecasts had already been extracted prior to this assessment for use in the County models demand matrices. As such the trip generation that was stored in the SINTRAM matrices was manipulated to represent the trip generation between 2005 and 2026 for zones that planning data was not available for. See Section 4 and Appendix C for more detail on the methodology involved in manipulating TEMPRO forecasts/SINTRAM demand matrices.

3.3.3 Both TRICS and TEMPRO are industry standard software and conform to current government guideline methodologies.

Issue No. Final Page 16 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

4 SCENARIOS AND FORECAST MATRICES

4.1 Modelled Scenarios

4.1.1 For the purposes of this assessment it was thought best to create three modelled scenarios: • 2011 Base; • 2026 Do-Nothing; • 2026 Do-Something.

4.1.2 Trip ends are the total number of trips that either have an origin (origin/departure trip ends) or destination (destination/arrival trip ends) within a defined modelled zone.

4.1.3 The 2011 Base represents the current situation and as such all trip ends are for 2011.

4.1.4 The 2026 Do-Nothing is where all trip ends external to the study area are for 2026, but trip ends within the study area (study area defined as Surrey zones and the zones in the borough of Rushmoor, district of Hart, Bordon, Crawley, East Grinstead, Haywards Heath and Horsham) are for the 2011 base year. Therefore the 2026 Do-Nothing represents the traffic impacts in Surrey as a result of the rest of the Country’s development to the forecast year of 2026, as no future development occurs in the study area (as this is retained at the base year).

4.1.5 The 2026 Do-Something is the same as the 2026 Do-Nothing, but includes the 2011 to 2026 proposed development (non-committed planned estimated development) in the study area. Therefore the 2026 Do-Something is where all trip ends in the model represent the forecast year of 2026.

4.1.6 All three modelled scenarios were created using both sources of trip generation; planning data combined with TRICS and TEMPRO forecasts. Therefore the modelled scenarios make use of accurate planning data to enable trip generation where possible, instead of wholly relying on TEMPRO forecasts.

4.1.7 The 2011 base acts as a reference case for the 2026 Do-Nothing and the 2026 Do-Nothing acts as a reference for the 2026 Do-Something.

4.2 Additional Trips

4.2.1 Tables 4.1 to 4.4 display a summary of the trip ends (for all modelled vehicles) by borough/district for the 2011 base, 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something. The absolute and percentage difference in trip ends shows the growth in trip ends between the scenarios and the relevant references.

4.2.2 Table 4.1 indicates that there are no changes in departure trip ends within Surrey between the 2011 base and 2026 Do-Nothing. This is because Surrey trip ends are restrained to the 2011 base year in the 2026 Do-Nothing. Table 4.1 shows that the borough of Reigate and Banstead is likely to incur the largest increase (16.5%) in departure trip ends within Surrey in the 2026 Do-Something (when compared to the 2026 Do-Nothing), followed by the boroughs of Woking (12.6% increase) and Runnymede (10.5% increase).

4.2.3 Table 4.2 states the three boroughs that contain the largest proportions of total departure trips in the County are Guildford (16.3%, 16.3% and 15.9%), Reigate

Issue No. Final Page 17 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

and Banstead (11.4%, 11.4% and 12.3%) and Elmbridge (10.7%, 10.7% and 10.4%) in the 2011 base, 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something respectively.

4.2.4 Table 4.3 indicates that there is a minimal increase in arrival trip ends in Surrey (135 trips) in the 2026 Do-Nothing, shown by a comparison to the 2011 base. This increase occurs, (even though the trip ends stay the same as the 2011 base year) as a result of the forecasting methodology using the furness method, which ends on a row balance, to create the 2026 Do-Nothing matrix. The furness method is a way of incorporating additional trips to a matrix, and the model does this by trying to add the trips to the relevant origin (rows) and destinations (columns) cells in the matrix. A matrix must balance the row and column totals, but a compromise is generally made to ensure the matrix totals balance, the compromise consists of a small amount of extra trips being added to the model. However, it is possible to state if the matrix balances to rows or columns, and in the case of the Do-Nothing, a row balance was chosen (as have greater reliance on origin data in AM peak hour). This row balance ensured that the desired amount of additional trips was added to the rows of the matrix and the small extra amount of trips (compromise) was added to the columns. Hence, no difference in origin trip ends being shown between the 2011 base and 2026 Do-Nothing in Table 4.1 and 4.2, but an additional 135 destination trips between the 2011 base and 2026 Do-Nothing being displayed in Table 4.3 and 4.4.

4.2.5 However, 135 additional trips generated from a furness method is a very minor amount in a model of this size, as shown by the percentage increases in Table 4.3 (all below 0.2%).

4.2.6 The largest increase in arrival trip ends in the County between the 2026 Do- Nothing and 2026 Do-Something is an additional 1,669 arrival trips (11.1% increase) in the borough of Reigate and Banstead.

4.2.7 Table 4.4 states that the three boroughs that incur the largest proportions of total arrival trips in the County are Guildford (15.6%, 15.6% and 15.5%), Reigate and Banstead (10.9%, 10.9% and 11.3%) and Elmbridge (10.6%, 10.6% and 10.3%) in the 2011 base, 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something respectively.

4.2.8 Therefore the borough of Reigate and Banstead incurs the largest increase in both departure (16.5% increase) and arrival trips (11.1% increase) in the 2026 Do-Something scenario (when compared to the 2026 Do-Nothing).

4.2.9 See Appendix B for trip ends (departure/origin and arrival/destination) for each modelled zone in Surrey.

Issue No. Final Page 18 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Origin (Departure) Trip Ends Absolute Difference Percentage Difference 2026 Do- 2026 Do- Borough/District 2026 Do- 2026 Do- 2026 Do- 2026 Do- Something Something 2011 Nothing less Nothing less Nothing Something less 2026 Do- less 2026 Do- 2011 2011 Nothing Nothing Elmbridge 14,101 14,101 14,714 0 613 0.0% 4.3% Epsom & Ewell 8,588 8,588 9,366 0 778 0.0% 9.1% Guildford 21,358 21,358 22,571 0 1,213 0.0% 5.7% Mole Valley 10,323 10,323 10,883 0 560 0.0% 5.4% Reigate & Banstead 14,949 14,949 17,411 0 2,462 0.0% 16.5% Runnymede 9,549 9,549 10,552 0 1,003 0.0% 10.5% Spelthorne 11,158 11,158 11,960 0 802 0.0% 7.2% Surrey Heath 7,921 7,921 8,607 0 686 0.0% 8.7% Tandridge 9,898 9,898 10,459 0 561 0.0% 5.7% Waverley 13,380 13,380 14,095 0 715 0.0% 5.3% Woking 10,053 10,053 11,317 0 1,264 0.0% 12.6% Total 131,278 131,278 141,935 0 10,657 0% 8% Table 4.1: Average AM (0700 – 1000) peak hour origin (departure) trip ends for all modelled vehicles and scenarios within Surrey

Origin (Departure) Trip Ends Borough/District 2026 Do- 2026 Do- 2011 Nothing Something Elmbridge 10.7% 10.7% 10.4% Epsom & Ewell 6.5% 6.5% 6.6% Guildford 16.3% 16.3% 15.9% Mole Valley 7.9% 7.9% 7.7% Reigate & Banstead 11.4% 11.4% 12.3% Runnymede 7.3% 7.3% 7.4% Spelthorne 8.5% 8.5% 8.4% Surrey Heath 6.0% 6.0% 6.1% Tandridge 7.5% 7.5% 7.4% Waverley 10.2% 10.2% 9.9% Woking 7.7% 7.7% 8.0% Total 100% 100% 100% Table 4.2: Percentage breakdown of origin (departure) trip ends within Surrey

Issue No. Final Page 19 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Destination (Arrival) Trip Ends Absolute Difference Percentage Difference 2026 Do- 2026 Do- Borough/District 2026 Do- 2026 Do- 2026 Do- 2026 Do- Something Something 2011 Nothing less Nothing less Nothing Something less 2026 Do- less 2026 Do- 2011 2011 Nothing Nothing Elmbridge 14,713 14,723 15,277 10 554 0.1% 3.8% Epsom & Ewell 9,373 9,380 9,908 7 528 0.1% 5.6% Guildford 21,578 21,598 22,872 20 1,274 0.1% 5.9% Mole Valley 11,024 11,034 11,716 10 682 0.1% 6.2% Reigate & Banstead 15,033 15,069 16,738 36 1,669 0.2% 11.1% Runnymede 11,277 11,289 12,463 12 1,174 0.1% 10.4% Spelthorne 12,021 12,030 12,526 9 496 0.1% 4.1% Surrey Heath 8,304 8,311 8,854 7 543 0.1% 6.5% Tandridge 11,072 11,078 11,616 6 538 0.1% 4.9% Waverley 14,002 14,014 14,718 12 704 0.1% 5.0% Woking 10,030 10,036 10,983 6 947 0.1% 9.4% Total 138,427 138,562 147,671 135 9,109 0% 7% Table 4.3: Average AM (0700 – 1000) peak hour destination (arrival) trip ends for all modelled vehicles and scenarios within Surrey

Destination (Arrival) Trip Ends Borough/District 2026 Do- 2026 Do- 2011 Nothing Something Elmbridge 10.6% 10.6% 10.3% Epsom & Ewell 6.8% 6.8% 6.7% Guildford 15.6% 15.6% 15.5% Mole Valley 8.0% 8.0% 7.9% Reigate & Banstead 10.9% 10.9% 11.3% Runnymede 8.1% 8.1% 8.4% Spelthorne 8.7% 8.7% 8.5% Surrey Heath 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% Tandridge 8.0% 8.0% 7.9% Waverley 10.1% 10.1% 10.0% Woking 7.2% 7.2% 7.4% Total 100% 100% 100% Table 4.4: Percentage breakdown of destination (arrival) trip ends within Surrey

Issue No. Final Page 20 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

4.3 Largest Increases in Trips

4.3.1 Tables 4.5 and 4.6 show the top twenty modelled zones within Surrey that have the largest amount of origin (departure) and destination (arrival) trip ends in the 2011 base matrix.

4.3.2 The area of the modelled zones (in hectares) is also displayed. It should be noted that the largest modelled zone in Surrey covers an area of 4,767 hectares (zone 320, Elstead & Thursley, Waverley).

No. of 2011 Area of Zone Trips to Zone Name Borough/District Origin Zone No. One Trip Ends (Hectares) Hectare 73 Ash & Normandy Guildford 2,434 3,249 0.75 186 Knaphill / St Johns Woking 1,640 380 4.32 318 Stoughton Guildford 1,180 123 9.59 279 Park Barn Guildford 1,113 131 8.50 454 Sunbury Common Spelthorne 1,078 174 6.20 415 Leatherhead Mole Valley 1,004 617 1.63 264 Horley - Meath Green Reigate & Banstead 978 328 2.98 450 Sunbury & Kempton Park Spelthorne 973 366 2.67 94 Burpham Guildford 958 222 4.32 298 Rydes Hill Guildford 950 109 8.72 455 West Bedfont Spelthorne 933 252 3.70 452 Ashford Common Spelthorne 926 154 6.01 385 Chertsey Runnymede 886 545 1.63 398 Merstham Reigate & Banstead 872 938 0.93 431 Walton on Thames Reservoirs Elmbridge 862 583 1.48 448 Staines - Kingston Rd (east) Spelthorne 857 131 6.54 519 Worplesdon Guildford 857 1,109 0.77 396 Nork Reigate & Banstead 852 363 2.35 408 Dorking - south Mole Valley 846 402 2.10 446 Laleham Spelthorne 840 1,070 0.79 Table 4.5: Top twenty Surrey zones with largest origin (departure) trip ends in 2011 base

Issue No. Final Page 21 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Area of No. of 2011 Zone Zone Trips to Zone Name Borough/District Destination No. (Hectares One Trip Ends ) Hectare 73 Ash & Normandy Guildford 1,958 3,249 0.60 186 Knaphill / St Johns Woking 1,806 380 4.75 454 Sunbury Common Spelthorne 1,353 174 7.76 407 Holmwood Mole Valley 1,339 1,325 1.01 329 Hindhead Waverley 1,229 682 1.80 383 Addlestone Moor Runnymede 1,208 306 3.95 385 Chertsey Runnymede 1,192 545 2.19 450 Sunbury & Kempton Park Spelthorne 1,174 366 3.21 264 Horley - Meath Green Reigate & Banstead 1,130 328 3.45 318 Stoughton Guildford 1,127 123 9.16 278 Onslow Village Guildford 1,110 133 8.35 408 Dorking - south Mole Valley 1,104 402 2.75 448 Staines - Kingston Rd (east) Spelthorne 1,084 131 8.27 298 Rydes Hill Guildford 1,067 109 9.79 386 Thorpe Runnymede 1,043 856 1.22 445 Staines - Laleham Rd Spelthorne 1,009 217 4.65 415 Leatherhead Mole Valley 999 617 1.62 397 Banstead Reigate & Banstead 991 462 2.15 384 Englefld Green Runnymede 981 670 1.46 279 Park Barn Guildford 973 131 7.43 Table 4.6: Top twenty Surrey zones with largest destination (arrival) trip ends in 2011 base

4.3.3 Tables 4.5 and 4.6 report that zone 73 (Ash & Normandy) and 186 (Knaphill / St. Johns) contain the largest amount of origin (departure) trip ends, as well as destination (arrival) trip ends, in the 2011 base scenario.

4.3.4 These zones appear both in Tables 4.5 and 4.6 indicating that these zones with the largest amount of origins also contain some of the largest amount of destinations trip ends. Zones within the boroughs of Guildford and Spelthorne are featured most in the top twenty zones of origin and destination trip ends in the 2011 base. Zones highlighted in bold, in Tables 4.5 and 4.6, indicates that the entry occurs in the top twenty of both largest origin and destination trip ends.

4.3.5 Tables 4.7 and 4.8 show the top twenty modelled zones within Surrey that have the largest amount of origin and destination trip ends in the 2026 Do-Something matrix.

4.3.6 Data was not presented for the 2026 Do-Nothing, as the trip ends are virtually the same as the 2011 base (for the zones in Surrey) as shown by Tables 4.1 to 4.4.

4.3.7 It is important to note that the trip generation for the Surrey boroughs of Epsom & Ewell, Guildford, Spelthorne and Tandridge are purely based on TEMPRO forecasts.

Issue No. Final Page 22 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

2026 DS Area of No. of Zone Origin Zone Trips to Zone Name Borough/District No. Trip (Hectares One Ends ) Hectare 73 Ash & Normandy Guildford 2,649 3,249 0.82 186 Knaphill / St Johns Woking 1,774 380 4.67 264 Horley - Meath Green Reigate & Banstead 1,518 328 4.63 379 Ottershaw Runnymede 1,512 1,835 0.82 318 Stoughton Guildford 1,267 123 10.30 279 Park Barn Guildford 1,212 131 9.25 415 Leatherhead Mole Valley 1,124 617 1.82 454 Sunbury Common Spelthorne 1,123 174 6.45 452 Ashford Common Spelthorne 1,036 154 6.73 450 Sunbury & Kempton Park Spelthorne 1,031 366 2.82 298 Rydes Hill Guildford 1,028 109 9.43 455 West Bedfont Spelthorne 1,005 252 1.91 94 Burpham Guildford 997 222 4.49 398 Merstham Reigate & Banstead 979 938 1.04 396 Nork Reigate & Banstead 951 363 2.62 105 Redhill - Marketfield Way Reigate & Banstead 939 159 5.91 446 Laleham Spelthorne 915 1,070 0.86 448 Staines - Kingston Rd (east) Spelthorne 914 131 6.98 431 Walton on Thames Reservoirs Elmbridge 908 583 1.56 408 Dorking - south Mole Valley 900 402 2.24 Table 4.7: Top twenty Surrey zones with largest origin (departure) trip ends in 2026 Do- Something

Area of No. of 2026 DS Zone Zone Trips to Zone Name Borough/District Destination No. (Hectares One Trip Ends ) Hectare 73 Ash & Normandy Guildford 2,080 3,249 0.64 186 Knaphill / St Johns Woking 1,951 380 5.13 383 Addlestone Moor Runnymede 1,491 306 4.87 407 Holmwood Mole Valley 1,424 1,325 1.07 454 Sunbury Common Spelthorne 1,389 174 7.98 264 Horley - Meath Green Reigate & Banstead 1,286 328 3.92 385 Chertsey Runnymede 1,272 545 2.33 329 Hindhead Waverley 1,259 682 1.85 450 Sunbury & Kempton Park Spelthorne 1,192 366 3.26 278 Onslow Village Guildford 1,190 133 8.95 318 Stoughton Guildford 1,184 123 9.63 408 Dorking - south Mole Valley 1,162 402 2.89 448 Staines - Kingston Rd (east) Spelthorne 1,136 131 8.67 298 Rydes Hill Guildford 1,124 109 10.31 386 Thorpe Runnymede 1,110 856 1.30 518 Doversgreen & South Park Reigate & Banstead 1,076 602 1.79 445 Staines - Laleham Rd Spelthorne 1,071 217 4.94 397 Banstead Reigate & Banstead 1,058 462 2.29 415 Leatherhead Mole Valley 1,042 617 1.69 279 Park Barn Guildford 1,035 131 7.90

Issue No. Final Page 23 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Table 4.8: Top twenty Surrey zones with largest destination (arrival) trip ends in 2026 Do- Something

Issue No. Final Page 24 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

4.3.8 Zones highlighted in bold, in Tables 4.7 and 4.8, indicates that the entry occurs in the top twenty of both largest origin and destination trip ends.

4.3.9 Tables 4.7 and 4.8 indicate that the two zones that contain the largest origin and destination trip ends in the 2011 base (zones 73 and 186) continue to be prevalent in the 2026 Do-Something. However, the growth in trip ends in these zones is not thought to be very large, for example the largest increase is 215 origin trips in zone 73 (Ash & Normandy).

4.3.10 Comparisons of zones containing the largest trip ends in the 2011 base and 2026 Do-Something indicates that the trends remain relatively constant. However, a main difference concerning origin trip ends is the appearance of zones 379 (Ottershaw) and 105 (Redhill – Marketfield Way) in Table 4.7. This refers to an increase in origin trip ends in these two zones caused by proposed non- committed planned development between 2011 and 2026.

4.3.11 The trend displayed between the 2011 and 2026 destination trip ends also remains relatively constant, with exception to zone 518 (Doversgreen & South Park) as this zone appears in the top twenty of largest trip ends in the 2026 Do- Something, but not in the 2011 top twenty.

4.3.12 Figure 4.1 shows the disposition of additional departure trips projected to occur between 2011 and 2026 within Surrey, as well as the relevant large developments external to the County. Proportional circles plotted on the modelled network represent the additional departure trips. The areas of the circles are scaled to the zone containing the largest amount of additional departure trips.

4.3.13 Therefore Figure 4.1 presents a pictorial representation of the quantity and location of the additional departure trips between the 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something (in the study area this refers to 2011 to 2026 non-committed development).

4.3.14 The proportional circles are positioned at the top left of each zone centroid (the area of zone where traffic loads on and off of the network).

Issue No. Final Page 25 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Key N 343 Zone Number Circle proportional to amount of additional departure trips

Figure 4.1: Additional departure (origin) trips between the 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something, for all zones in Surrey and large developments external to the County i.e. 2011 to 2026 non-committed planned development.

Issue No. Final Page 26 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

4.3.15 Figure 4.1 indicates that the areas to incur the largest amount of additional departure trips in the 2026 Do-Something are external to County. Zone 491 Crawley South in West Sussex, is projected to generate some of the largest amounts of additional departure trips between 2011 and 2026. The zone containing the AUE development in Hampshire (zone 155 Aldershot Barracks) is also forecast to generate a large amount of additional departure trips.

4.3.16 Figure 4.1 indicates that there are multiple areas of the County, which are forecast to incur relative amounts of additional departure trips in the average AM peak hour in close proximity. Broadly these areas are the boroughs of Runnymede and Reigate and Banstead. This trend shown by Figure 4.1 has also been previously identified in Table 4.1, as these boroughs incur the largest proportions of additional departure trips in the 2026 Do-Something.

4.3.17 Tables 4.9 and 4.10 show the twenty zones within Surrey that incur the largest increases in trip ends between the 2026 Do-Nothing (essentially the 2011 base) and the 2026 Do-Something. The absolute differences as well as the percentage differences are displayed. Therefore Table 4.9 displays the same information shown in Figure 4.1, in absolute values, but only Surrey zones.

4.3.18 Tables 4.9 and 4.10 report that, within Surrey, zone 379 (Ottershaw) experiences the largest increase (758 trips) in departure trips and zone 383 (Addlestone Moor) experiences the largest increase (282 trips) in arrival trips, between the 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something.

4.3.19 Zones within the borough of Reigate and Banstead are featured most frequently in the twenty largest increases in departure and arrival trip ends. This correlates to information previously shown in Tables 4.1 and 4.3, as Reigate and Banstead is to incur the largest proportion of additional trips compared to all other Surrey borough/districts.

4.3.20 Two of the top five zones with largest increases in departure trip ends, zone 379 Ottershaw and 365 Deepcut & Mytchett contain some of the largest developments (in terms of size) forecast to occur within the County. The redevelopment of the former Defence Evaluation and Research Agency (DERA) site (in Runnymede) is projected to occur between 2011 and 2026, and as such is represented in this modelling, giving explanation as to why zone 379 contains the largest increase in departure trips. Secondly the redevelopment of the Princess Royal Barracks at Deepcut has also been included in this assessment, and is an explanation for why zone 365 contains the fifth largest increase in departure trips.

Issue No. Final Page 27 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Absolute Percentage Difference Difference Area of Zone No. Zone Name Borough/District (2026 DS (2026 DS Zone less 2026 less 2026 (Hectares) DN) DN) 379 Ottershaw Runnymede 758 101% 1,835 264 Horley - Meath Green Reigate & Banstead 540 55% 328 274 West Byfleet Town Centre Woking 468 224% 49 365 Deepcut & Mytchett Surrey Heath 325 64% 1,015 275 Woking Town Centre Woking 314 217% 24 73 Ash & Normandy Guildford 215 9% 3,249 105 Redhill - Marketfield Way Reigate & Banstead 175 23% 159 393 Kingswood Reigate & Banstead 152 22% 1,409 272 Gatton Park & Wray Park Reigate & Banstead 146 40% 442 186 Knaphill / St Johns Woking 134 8% 380 312 Redhill - Marketfield Way Reigate & Banstead 131 127% 159 166 Horley Town Centre Reigate & Banstead 124 19% 215 110 Reigate Rd / Linkfield Corner Reigate & Banstead 120 24% 95 415 Leatherhead Mole Valley 120 12% 617 461 Longmead & Horton Hospitals East Epsom & Ewell 113 17% 213 452 Ashford Common Spelthorne 110 12% 154 398 Merstham Reigate & Banstead 107 12% 938 462 Ruxley Lane Epsom & Ewell 104 14% 240 279 Park Barn Guildford 99 9% 131 396 Nork Reigate & Banstead 99 12% 363 Table 4.9: Top twenty Surrey zones with largest difference in origin (departure) trip ends between the 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something

Absolute Percentage Difference Difference Area of Zone No. Zone Name Borough/District (2026 DS (2026 DS Zone less 2026 less 2026 (Hectares DN) DN) 383 Addlestone Moor Runnymede 282 23% 306 387 New Haw Runnymede 202 38% 357 264 Horley - Meath Green Reigate & Banstead 155 14% 328 519 Worplesdon Guildford 146 19% 1,109 186 Knaphill / St Johns Woking 143 8% 380 518 Doversgreen & South Pk Reigate & Banstead 131 14% 602 73 Ash & Normandy Guildford 121 6% 3,249 105 Redhill - Marketfield Way Reigate & Banstead 117 15% 159 382 Addlestone Town Centre Runnymede 110 16% 264 398 Merstham Reigate & Banstead 110 12% 938 380 West Byfleet - Woodham Runnymede 104 22% 244 166 Horley Town Centre Reigate & Banstead 97 14% 215 374 Frimley & Frimley Hospital Surrey Heath 95 10% 214 110 Reigate Rd / Linkfield Corner Reigate & Banstead 87 16% 95 381 Row Town Runnymede 85 13% 318 407 Holmwood Mole Valley 84 6% 1,325 271 Horley - North East Reigate & Banstead 81 17% 269 278 Onslow Village Guildford 79 7% 133 385 Chertsey Runnymede 79 7% 545 272 Gatton Park & Wray Park Reigate & Banstead 74 16% 442 Table 4.10: Top twenty Surrey zones with largest difference in destination (arrival) trip ends between the 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something.

Issue No. Final Page 28 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

4.4 Forecast Matrices

4.4.1 To generate the 2011 base matrix it was necessary to first obtain TEMPRO trip end forecasts for the years of 2005 and 2011. 2011 trip ends where applied to all zones in the model that SCC does not possess planning data for, whereas 2005 trip ends where initially applied to all zones that SCC does possess planning data for. 2005 to 2011 trip rates (sourced from committed planning data and TRICS trip generation) were then added to the 2005 trip ends using the growth factor method, based on a row balance.

4.4.2 The 2011 base matrix was then utilised in the creation of the 2026 Do-Nothing forecast matrix. All trip ends in zones covering the study area were retained at the 2011 base year whereas all other trips in the model represent the forecast year of 2026. 2026 trip end forecasts for all other zones external to the study area were sourced from TEMPRO. All trips in the 2026 Do-Nothing were incorporated into the matrix by using the furness method, based on a row balance.

4.4.3 The 2026 Do-Something matrix was created by initially using the 2026 Do- Nothing matrix, and then adding the 2011 to 2026 additional trips to the zones in the study area (SCC and large developments external to the County). 2011 to 2026 additional trip rates were sourced from non-committed planning data and TRICS (for study area zones that SCC obtained planning data for) as well as TEMPRO trip end forecasts (for study area zones that SCC did not obtain planning data for). The additional forecast trip ends between 2011 and 2026 were incorporated into the matrix using the growth factor method, based on a row balance.

4.4.4 Use of a row (origin) balance in the growth factor method was thought preferable to a column (destination) balance as departure trips can be assumed to be more reliable in the AM time period. A row balance causes the matrix to balance according to the matrix row total, causing any balancing (adding/subtracting of any additional trips) to occur in the column totals of the matrix, making the row trip ends more accurate. It could therefore be said that this assessment is more reliable in terms of projected additional departure (origin) trips in the scenarios, as these trips have been incorporated in the model in an accurate method.

4.4.5 Additional trips added to the relevant zones of the forecast matrices follow the base AM distribution of individual zones. Such distributions were established during the model validation process. It was thought appropriate to use these base distributions as no information was provided, or obtained, regarding the future distribution of proposed developments.

4.4.6 See Appendix C for detailed flow charts describing the processes undertaken to create the 2011, 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something matrices.

4.4.7 Figures 4.2 to 4.4 show a diagrammatic views of the trip ends incorporated in the 2011, 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something matrices.

Issue No. Final Page 29 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Key 2011 Trip Ends Rest of Britain trip ends sourced from 2011 TEMPRO forecasts Rest of Britain

Study Area

Study Area trip ends either sourced from 2005 TEMPRO forecasts plus 2005 – 2011 trip generation from committed developments planning data/TRICS (for zones that SCC does possess planning data for), or 2011 TEMPRO forecasts (for zones that SCC does not possess planning data for). Figure 4.2: Diagrammatic view of trip ends incorporated in 2011 matrix

Key 2011 Trip Ends Rest of Britain trip 2026 Trip Ends ends sourced from 2026 TEMPRO forecasts Rest of Britain

Study Area

Study Area trip ends same as 2011 matrix, retained at 2011 base year.

Figure 4.3: Diagrammatic view of trip ends incorporated in 2026 Do-Nothing matrix

Issue No. Final Page 30 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Key 2026 Trip Ends Rest of Britain trip ends same as 2026 Do-Nothing matrix.

Rest of Britain

Study Area

Study Area trip ends initially same as 2026 Do-Nothing matrix (2011). Then added 2011 – 2026 trip generation to the 2011 trip ends. 2011 – 2026 trips either sourced from non-committed developments planning data/TRICS (for zones that SCC does possess planning data for), or TEMPRO forecasts (for zones that SCC does not possess planning data for). Figure 4.4: Diagrammatic view of trip ends incorporated in 2026 Do-Something matrix

4.4.8 Tables 4.11 to 4.13 show the aggregated matrices for all modelled vehicle types for the AM average hour (0700 – 1000). The matrices have been aggregated into geographic sectors covering the borough/districts of Surrey, surrounding geographic areas and other areas of the Country.

4.4.9 Table 4.14 shows the matrix totals and intra County trips as well as the absolute and percentage differences between the modelled scenarios and the 2011 base year.

Issue No. Final Page 31 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Elmbridge Epsom & Ewell Guildford Valley Mole Reigate & Banstead Runnymede Spelthorne Surrey Heath Tandridge Waverley Woking Rushmoor & Hart Bordon Horsham & Crawley E.Grinstead & H.Heath London Rest of Britain Total Elmbridge 9,426 25 488 376 12 830 382 3 2 287 325 15 0 63 0 1,369 496 14,099 Epsom & 80 3,849 29 665 644 17 112 2 2 126 18 13 0 25 0 2,730 224 8,534 Ewell Guildford 251 9 12,168 418 225 50 54 173 54 2,104 1,242 835 7 4 30 2,077 1,713 21,414

Mole Valley 365 457 482 6,866 504 4 4 4 6 203 34 15 0 172 1 340 866 10,322 Reigate & 5 643 495 457 8,507 32 29 164 616 97 226 123 0 783 2 1,836 935 14,951 Banstead Runnymede 492 2 109 9 100 5,684 704 326 3 102 727 23 0 54 0 135 1,080 9,549

Spelthorne 372 30 82 3 62 1,643 5,794 11 1 12 94 4 0 19 0 2,141 887 11,156 Surrey 3 1 260 7 36 202 15 4,915 80 48 421 945 3 26 0 138 821 7,921 Heath Tandridge 6 6 175 20 767 2 3 127 5,760 35 53 11 0 236 272 1,333 1,092 9,896

Waverley 142 39 2,585 110 15 6 8 25 16 6,603 283 368 434 1 0 866 1,876 13,376

Woking 191 1 1,896 5 84 678 17 279 12 388 5,108 150 6 63 0 396 777 10,051 Rushmoor 11 12 411 22 25 51 41 647 4 653 86 12,171 52 0 0 1,436 4,706 20,328 & Hart Bordon 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 402 1 1 190 0 0 3 981 1,581 Horsham & 27 45 45 1,136 1,033 23 26 2 293 124 78 8 0 8,853 88 926 7,843 20,548 Crawley E.Grinstead 1 2 42 6 11 0 0 0 313 1 4 0 0 89 359 11 3,749 4,589 & H.Heath London 2,468 3,985 1,355 389 2,215 698 3,297 122 2,206 367 776 339 19 1,927 4 595,810 45,481 661,457 Rest of 871 177 1,042 536 796 1,360 1,533 1,505 1,703 2,449 551 6,242 615 11,656 4,915 179,218 4,832,708 5,047,877 Britain Total 14,712 9,282 21,667 11,024 15,035 11,278 12,019 8,304 11,070 14,001 10,026 21,263 1,326 23,970 5,672 790,765 4,906,235 5,887,649 Table 4.11: 2011 Base aggregated matrix

Issue No. Final Page 32 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Elmbridge Epsom & Ewell Guildford Valley Mole Reigate & Banstead Runnymede Spelthorne Surrey Heath Tandridge Waverley Woking Rushmoor & Hart Bordon Horsham & Crawley E.Grinstead & H.Heath London Rest of Britain Total Elmbridge 9,617 25 446 383 11 822 350 2 2 271 289 12 0 59 0 1,331 479 14,099 Epsom & 86 3,895 27 676 664 16 114 1 1 123 18 13 0 24 0 2,637 238 8,534 Ewell Guildford 230 8 12,234 428 235 47 58 163 50 2,066 1,215 777 8 6 32 2,121 1,737 21,414

Mole Valley 405 434 484 6,923 459 3 4 3 6 189 32 14 0 203 1 309 857 10,322 Reigate & 4 649 493 440 8,351 29 27 155 629 91 231 122 0 920 2 1,876 943 14,963 Banstead Runnymede 438 2 108 8 108 5,734 692 314 2 116 744 22 0 50 0 135 1,073 9,549

Spelthorne 363 28 87 3 67 1,682 5,847 9 1 12 92 4 0 18 0 2,030 914 11,156 Surrey 3 1 258 7 35 200 10 5,042 86 49 406 815 3 28 0 149 831 7,921 Heath Tandridge 5 5 159 19 751 1 2 138 5,671 36 51 10 0 242 278 1,346 1,182 9,896

Waverley 154 42 2,542 106 15 6 7 22 10 6,530 275 350 408 1 0 922 1,986 13,376

Woking 167 1 1,891 5 86 678 19 272 15 372 5,182 146 6 69 0 401 743 10,052 Rushmoor 12 14 427 22 30 52 38 600 5 644 103 12,117 44 0 0 1,300 4,922 20,328 & Hart Bordon 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 400 1 0 281 0 0 5 888 1,581 Horsham & 24 41 41 1,051 1,116 16 21 2 250 89 69 7 0 8,266 90 835 8,630 20,548 Crawley E.Grinstead 1 2 40 6 13 0 0 0 311 1 4 0 0 120 371 10 3,710 4,589 & H.Heath London 2,363 3,969 1,385 409 2,320 676 3,357 110 2,248 364 777 340 17 2,008 4 631,900 49,476 701,723 Rest of 851 176 1,059 548 807 1,325 1,480 1,477 1,792 2,661 548 6,529 559 11,969 4,898 180,945 5,322,541 5,540,166 Britain Total 14,724 9,290 21,686 11,033 15,065 11,287 12,028 8,311 11,078 14,013 10,035 21,278 1,327 23,984 5,675 828,252 5,401,148 6,420,217 Table 4.12: 2026 Do-Nothing aggregated matrix

Issue No. Final Page 33 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Elmbridge Epsom & Ewell Guildford Valley Mole Reigate & Banstead Runnymede Spelthorne Surrey Heath Tandridge Waverley Woking Rushmoor & Hart Bordon Horsham & Crawley E.Grinstead & H.Heath London Rest of Britain Total Elmbridge 10,050 26 462 399 11 871 367 3 2 283 304 13 0 61 0 1,359 505 14,716 Epsom & 91 4,292 29 736 727 17 122 1 2 129 18 14 0 26 0 2,851 254 9,309 Ewell Guildford 243 8 12,942 460 249 49 61 173 52 2,181 1,270 850 8 7 32 2,221 1,825 22,631

Mole Valley 434 458 503 7,318 476 3 4 3 6 196 34 15 0 211 1 325 898 10,884 Reigate & 5 735 601 508 9,772 35 31 164 726 106 267 138 0 1,162 2 2,072 1,087 17,410 Banstead Runnymede 464 2 110 9 113 6,570 703 352 3 117 767 23 0 66 0 145 1,107 10,550

Spelthorne 387 30 92 3 71 1,812 6,293 10 1 12 97 4 0 20 0 2,158 972 11,960 Surrey 3 1 275 7 39 209 13 5,467 97 57 424 930 3 31 0 165 888 8,608 Heath Tandridge 5 6 164 20 786 2 2 145 6,022 37 54 11 0 251 286 1,426 1,243 10,461

Waverley 159 45 2,658 107 16 7 7 23 11 6,921 289 369 438 2 0 951 2,092 14,094

Woking 182 1 2,111 5 88 819 20 292 19 403 5,933 153 6 69 0 420 793 11,315 Rushmoor 12 14 485 22 30 53 42 632 5 729 117 14,000 49 0 0 1,409 5,195 22,792 & Hart Bordon 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 418 1 0 293 0 0 5 927 1,650 Horsham & 26 45 44 1,156 1,219 17 23 2 284 101 74 7 0 9,193 101 878 9,723 22,894 Crawley E.Grinstead 1 2 45 7 13 0 0 0 347 1 4 0 0 117 404 12 3,681 4,634 & H.Heath London 2,363 3,969 1,385 409 2,320 676 3,357 110 2,248 364 777 340 17 2,008 4 631,900 49,476 701,723 Rest of 851 176 1,059 548 808 1,325 1,480 1,477 1,792 2,661 548 6,529 559 11,971 4,898 180,947 5,322,540 5,540,170 Britain Total 15,277 9,809 22,969 11,715 16,737 12,464 12,525 8,853 11,616 14,715 10,978 23,396 1,374 25,195 5,728 829,242 5,403,206 6,435,800 Table 4.13: 2026 Do-Something aggregated matrix

Issue No. Final Page 34 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Surrey Absolute % External to Absolute % County to Absolute % Absolute % Intra Matrix Scenario Difference Difference County Difference Difference External Difference Difference Difference Difference County total from 2011 from 2011 Trips from 2011 from 2011 Trips from 2011 from 2011 from 2011 from 2011 Trips 2011 102,436 35,982 28,833 5,887,649 2026 Do-Nothing 102,399 -37 0.0% 36,213 231 0.6% 28,942 109 0.4% 6,420,217 532,568 9.0% 2026 Do-Something 110,978 8,542 8.3% 36,680 698 1.9% 30,960 2,127 7.4% 6,435,800 548,151 9.3% Table 4.14: Matrix summaries

Issue No. Final Page 35 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

5 MODELLING RESULTS

5.1 Summary Network Statistics

5.1.1 Tables 5.1 and 5.2 present the network based summary statistics for all modelled vehicles and links within Surrey. The summary statistics compare the key outputs from the modelling of the 2011 base, 2026 Do-Nothing and the 2026 Do- Something. The network statistics are disaggregated into road types.

5.1.2 Table 5.1 shows the amount and proportional breakdown of links modelled within the Surrey.

% of Road No. of Road Road Type Length Links Length (Kms) (Kms) Motorway 223 284 7.4% Trunk A road 184 144 3.7% Principal A road 1,892 1,217 31.6% B road 989 823 21.4% Other road 1,520 1,384 35.9% Total 4,808 3,851 100% Table 5.1: Modelled links in Surrey

Surrey Network Totals Absolute Difference Percentage Difference

2026 Do- 2026 Do- 2026 Do- 2026 Do- Statistic Road Type 2026 Do- 2026 Do- Something Something 2011 Nothing Nothing Nothing Something less 2026 less 2026 less 2011 less 2011 Do-Nothing Do-Nothing

Motorway 1,192,870 1,200,8031,215,903 7,933 15,100 0.7% 1.3% Trunk A road 332,312 334,230 337,107 1,918 2,877 0.6% 0.9% Vehicle Principal A road 971,362 976,336 1,005,283 4,974 28,947 0.5% 3.0% Kilometres (veh kms) B road 445,914 451,490 465,251 5,576 13,761 1.3% 3.0% Other road 545,419 550,692 572,904 5,273 22,212 1.0% 4.0% Total 3,487,877 3,513,5513,596,448 25,674 82,897 0.7% 2.4% Motorway 18,747 19,223 19,861 476 638 2.5% 3.3% Trunk A road 5,145 5,226 5,329 81 103 1.6% 2.0% Vehicle Principal A road 21,123 21,314 22,192 191 878 0.9% 4.1% Hours (veh hrs) B road 10,721 10,847 11,380 126 533 1.2% 4.9% Other road 11,824 11,956 12,590 132 634 1.1% 5.3% Total 67,560 68,566 71,352 1,006 2,786 1.5% 4.1% Motorway 63.6 62.5 61.2 -1.10 -1.30 -1.7% -2.1% Trunk A road 64.6 64.0 63.3 -0.60 -0.70 -0.9% -1.1% Average Principal A road 46.0 45.8 45.3 -0.20 -0.50 -0.4% -1.1% Speed (kph) B road 41.6 41.6 40.9 0.00 -0.70 0.0% -1.7% Other road 46.1 46.1 45.5 0.00 -0.60 0.0% -1.3% Average 52.4 52.0 51.2 -0.38 -0.76 -0.7% -1.5% Table 5.2: Surrey summary statistics

Issue No. Final Page 36 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

5.1.3 In summary Table 5.2 indicates that the County as a whole experiences relatively minor increases in the key transport statistics in all modelled scenarios, when compared to their references (2011 base acts as a reference for the 2026 Do- Nothing and the 2026 Do-Nothing is a reference for the 2026 Do-Something).

5.1.4 Secondly all road types experience an increase in vehicle kilometres and vehicle hours between the scenarios and the references. A decrease in average speed is a direct result of increased vehicle kilometres, which is apparent in all modelled variants when compared to their relevant reference case.

5.1.5 No additional trips are added to the study area within the 2026 Do-Nothing, so increases in summary statistics in the 2026 Do-Nothing are the impacts felt in Surrey as a result of residual growth in Great Britain in 2026.

5.1.6 The vehicle kilometres travelled within Surrey increases by 0.7% in the 2026 Do- Nothing when compared to the 2011 base. In the 2026 Do-Something vehicle kilometres increases by 2.4% when compared to the 2026 Do-Nothing. The amount of vehicle hours is the statistic that has the largest increase (4.1%) in the 2026 Do-Something when compared to the 2026 Do-Nothing. The average speed of all links in Surrey is 52.4 kph (2011 base), 52.0 kph (2026 Do-Nothing) and 51.2 kph (2026 Do-Something), relating to a 0.7% and 1.5% reduction in the 2026 Do-Nothing and Do-Something.

5.1.7 The road type that has the largest amount of vehicle kilometres travelled (in the County) for all modelled scenarios is the motorway category. The motorways continue to incur the largest absolute increase in vehicle kilometres in the 2026 Do-Nothing, with an absolute increase of 7,933 veh kms relating to a 0.7% increase (compared to the 2011 base). However, the Principal A road category is also likely to experience the largest increase in vehicle kilometres in the 2026 Do-Something, an increase of 28,947 veh kms relating to a 3% increase (compared to the 2026 Do-Nothing). An explanation for this is that in the 2026 Do-Nothing only trips external to the study area were being growthed to 2026, and as such vehicle kilometres on the motorway links in Surrey incur the largest increase as a result of trips travelling through the County on long distance travel by use of the SRN. In the 2026 Do-Something only additional trips were added to Surrey and local external developments, as a result vehicle kilometres have increased most on principal roads, suggesting increased flow on the LRN around the County to reach a destination internal or external to the County.

5.1.8 The Principal A road category also experiences the largest absolute increase in vehicle hours in the 2026 Do-Something (when compared to the 2026 Do- Nothing), with an absolute increase of 878 veh hrs relating to a 4.1% increase. Trunk roads experience the smallest absolute increase in vehicle hours in the 2026 Do-Something when compared to the 2026 Do-Nothing (absolute increase of 103 veh hrs relating to a 2% increase). Table 5.1 highlights that the road type that covers the smallest amount of distance is the Trunk A road (144 km).

5.1.9 In the 2026 Do-Nothing scenario the road type to experience the largest absolute reduction in average speed is the motorway category (absolute decrease of 1.1 kph relating to a 2.1% reduction), thus correlating with the motorways also incurring the largest increase in vehicle kilometres and vehicle hours in the 2026 Do-Nothing (compared to the 2011 Base). This therefore relates to the trip ends external to the study area using the motorways most to travel through the County, relating to long distance travel. In the 2026 Do-Something the motorways, B roads and Other roads experience the largest absolute decreases in average speed, reduction of 2.1%, 1.7% and 1.3% respectively.

Issue No. Final Page 37 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

5.2 Strategic Route Network Journey Times

5.2.1 Tables 5.3 to 5.6 show the average speeds and journey times estimated to be experienced on all the major sections of the SRN in the County for all modelled vehicles. The sections of the SRN that journey times have been calculated for are: • M25 junction 5 – 14 (clockwise and anti-clockwise) • M23 junction 7 – 10 (northbound and southbound) • M3 junction 1 – 4 (northbound and southbound) • A3 Hindhead – Tolworth (northbound and southbound)

Issue No. Final Page 38 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Differences Journey Time Journey Time Average Speed Average Speed (Mins: Secs) - (Mins, Secs) - Average Speed (Kph) (Kph) - Percentage Journey Time (Mins: Secs) Junction (Kph) - Absolute Absolute Percentage Differences Junction Length Differences Differences Differences (Km) 2026 DS 2026 DS 2026 DS 2026 DS 2026 DN 2026 DN 2026 DN 2026 DN 2011 2026 DN 2026 DS less 2026 less 2026 2011 2026 DN 2026 DS less 2026 less 2026 less 2011 less 2011 less 2011 less 2011 DN DN DN DN J5 - 6 16 48.1 45.2 46.9 -3.0 1.7 -6.2% 3.9% 19:22 20:39 19:53 1:17 -0:46 6.6% -3.7% J6 - 7 5 86.3 86.1 86.1 -0.3 0.0 -0.3% 0.0% 3:11 3:12 3:12 0:01 0:00 0.4% -0.1% J7 - 8 6 76.2 78.0 74.9 1.8 -3.1 2.3% -4.0% 5:21 5:17 5:25 -0:04 0:08 -1.1% 2.5% J8 - 9 11 61.2 60.7 58.7 -0.6 -2.0 -0.9% -3.3% 12:20 12:28 13:1 0:08 0:33 1.2% 4.4% J9 - 10 10 56.0 54.2 51.4 -1.8 -2.8 -3.2% -5.2% 10:39 11:00 11:36 0:21 0:36 3.3% 5.4% J10 - 11 8 65.2 62.6 59.8 -2.5 -2.8 -3.9% -4.5% 7:37 7:57 8:21 0:20 0:24 4.4% 5.1% J11 - 12 4 67.3 67.8 62.0 0.5 -5.8 0.8% -8.6% 3:16 3:14 3:32 -0:02 0:18 -0.9% 9.3% J12 - 13 5 85.0 81.9 81.0 -3.1 -0.9 -3.6% -1.1% 3:40 3:49 3:51 0:09 0:02 4.4% 0.8% J13 - 14 4 71.6 71.0 70.4 -0.5 -0.6 -0.8% -0.9% 4, 12 4:17 4:24 0:05 0:07 2.1% 2.5% J5 - 14 69 68.5 67.5 65.7 -1.1 -1.8 -1.5% -2.7% 69:37 71:54 73:15 2:17 1:21 3.3% 1.9% J14 - 13 3 102.8 102.9 103.1 0.1 0.2 0.1% 0.2% 1:56 1:56 1:56 0:00 0:00 0.0% -0.2% J13 - 12 5 105.0 104.9 104.6 -0.1 -0.3 -0.1% -0.3% 2:54 2:54 2:54 0:00 0:01 0.1% 0.4% J12 - 11 4 95.9 95.7 94.5 -0.3 -1.2 -0.3% -1.3% 2:26 2:26 2:28 0:01 0:02 0.4% 1.5% J11 - 10 8 86.8 86.2 85.8 -0.7 -0.3 -0.8% -0.4% 5:37 5:40 5:41 0:03 0:01 0.8% 0.4% J10 - 9 10 83.9 81.6 82.2 -2.4 0.6 -2.8% 0.7% 7:25 7:39 7:35 0:14 -0:04 3.1% -0.8% J9 - 8 11 84.9 83.7 83.3 -1.3 -0.3 -1.5% -0.4% 8:10 8:08 8:10 0:07 0:02 1.5% 0.4% J8 - 7 6 86.4 85.7 81.6 -0.7 -4.1 -0.9% -4.8% 3:51 3:53 4:06 0:02 0:13 0.9% 5.4% J7 - 6 5 84.7 81.1 81.5 -3.7 0.4 -4.3% 0.5% 3:25 3:32 3:31 0:07 0:00 3.3% -0.2% J6 - 5 16 67.1 63.6 62.5 -3.4 -1.1 -5.1% -1.8% 17:16 18:47 19:19 1:31 0:32 8.8% 2.8% J14 - 5 69 88.6 87.2 86.6 -1.4 -0.7 -1.6% -0.8% 52:51 54:55 55:42 2:04 0:46 3.9% 1.4% Table 5.3: Journey times for the M25 junctions 4 – 15 (clockwise and anit-clockwise)

Issue No. Final Page 39 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Issue No. Final Page 40 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Differences Journey Time Journey Time Average Speed Average Speed (Mins:Secs) - (Mins, Secs) - Junctio Average Speed (Kph) (Kph) - Percentage Journey Time (Mins:Secs) (Kph) - Absolute Absolute Percentage n Differences Junction Differences Differences Differences Length 2026 DS 2026 DS 2026 DS 2026 DS (Km) 2026 DN 2026 DN 2026 DN 2026 DN 2011 2026 DN 2026 DS less 2026 less 2026 2011 2026 DN 2026 DS less 2026 less 2026 less 2011 less 2011 less 2011 less 2011 DN DN DN DN Hindhead - Guildford 21 65.9 65.3 65.4 -0.6 0.1 -1.0% 0.2% 20:45 20:59 20:58 0:13 0:00 1.1% 0.0% (Dennis Roundabout) Guildford (Dennis Roundabout) - 14 78.2 77.2 76.2 -1.1 -0.9 -1.4% -1.2% 10:05 10:16 10:25 0:10 0:10 1.7% 1.6% M25 (Wisley Interchange) M25 (Wisley Interchange) - 15 70.5 70.4 69.0 -0.1 -1.4 -0.1% -2.0% 14:04 14:5 14:33 0:01 0:27 0.1% 3.2% Tolworth Hindhead - 50 71.5 70.9 70.2 -0.6 -0.7 -0.8% -1.1% 44:54 45:19 45:56 0:25 0:36 0.9% 1.3% Tolworth Tolworth - M25 (Wisley 14 76.2 76.4 76.1 0.1 -0.3 0.2% -0.3% 11:52 11:50 11:54 -0:02 0:05 -0.2% 0.6% Interchange) M25 (Wisley Interchange - Guildford 15 93.9 94.0 93.5 0.1 -0.5 0.1% -0.5% 9:15 9:15 9:17 -0:01 0:03 -0.1% 0.5% (Dennis Roundabout) Guildford (Dennis 21 75.8 75.9 75.7 0.1 -0.2 0.1% -0.2% 16:35 16:32 16:38 -0:03 0:06 -0.3% 0.6% Roundabout) - Hindhead Tolworth - 50 82.0 82.1 81.8 0.1 -0.3 0.1% -0.4% 37:42 37:37 37:50 -0:05 0:13 -0.2% 0.6% Hindhead Table 5.6: Journey times for the A3 Hindhead – Tolworth (northbound and southbound)

Issue No. Final Page 41 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

5.2.2 The flow, average speed and journey time of a link are all related. For example a general trend/correlation occurs between the three elements: when flow increases, average speed decreases and a result of this is increased journey time.

5.2.3 Tables 5.3 to 5.6 indicate that the future development projected to occur in the forecast year of 2026 has a minor affect on the SRN within Surrey. For example, the largest overall absolute increase in journey time estimated to occur in the 2026 Do-Something is on the northbound stretch of the M3 (between junctions 4 and 1), with an increase of 1 minute 32 seconds (3.6% increase) when compared to the 2026 Do-Nothing.

5.2.4 Table 5.3 indicates that the M25 junction 5 to 14 (clockwise) has a longer journey time in all modelled variants than junctions 14 to 5 (anti-clockwise). For example, it is estimated that the journey time between junctions 5 and 14 in the average AM peak hour in 2026 Do-Something is 73 minutes 15 seconds, whereas the journey time between junctions 14 and 5 is estimated to be 55 minutes 42 seconds. Therefore a difference of 17 minutes 33 seconds occurs in the 2026 Do-Something based on direction of travel on the whole section of the M25 in Surrey. Table 5.3 also suggests that the largest absolute increases in journey time between individual junctions in the 2026 Do-Something (when compared to the 2026 Do-Nothing), is present between junctions 9 and 10 (36 second increase relating to a 5.4% increase) and junctions 8 and 9 (33 second increase relating to 4.4% increase).

5.2.5 The additional trips generated from forecast development, in all modelled scenarios, is not likely to affect the M23 between junctions 7 and 10 (in a northbound and southbound direction). Table 5.4 indicates that the average speeds, and therefore the journey times too, remain virtually constant for this part of the SRN.

5.2.6 Average speeds and journey times for the M3 in Surrey (junctions 1 to 4) are presented in Table 5.5. The southbound stretch of the M3 between junctions 1 and 4 does not incur any relevant changes in average speed or journey times in the modelled scenarios. However, the northbound stretch, between junction 4 and 1 is subject to an increase in journey time of 1 minute 32 seconds (a 3.6% increase) in the 2026 Do-Something, compared to the 2026 Do-Nothing, as such it also incurs the lowest average speeds. Specifically junctions 3 to 2 are expected to incur the largest absolute increase in journey time in the 2026 Do- Something, 1 minute 1 second (a 4.4% increase), when compared to the 2026 Do-Nothing.

5.2.7 Table 5.6 indicates that the entire Surrey stretch of the A3 has a higher journey time in the 2026 Do-Something in a northbound direction, 45 minutes 56 seconds, when compared to the southbound direction, 37 minutes 50 seconds. A difference of 8 minutes 6 seconds based on the direction of travel in the 2026 Do-Something. When examining journey times for general sections of the A3, the northbound section between the M25 Wisley Interchange and Tolworth junction has the largest individual absolute increase (27 seconds relating to a 3.2% increase) in journey time in the 2026 Do-Something in comparison to the 2026 Do-Nothing.

Issue No. Final Page 42 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

5.3 Cost of Congestion compared to Volume/Capacity Ratio

5.3.1 SCC has created a cost of congestion map for the County for 2007/08. The map utilises free flow travel times, congested travel times, modelled flows and the application of a monetary value for different vehicle types. The cost of congestion is plotted on a map of Surrey to highlight the roads in the County that have the highest costs of congestion due to changes in free flow and congested travel times.

5.3.2 The values of time for each vehicle type (Car, LGV and HGV) were sourced from WebTAG (TAG Unit 3.5.6 Table 9). The modelled flows were sourced from the County model (SINTRAM), and the observed travel times were sourced from the Department for Transport’s (DfT) Congestion Journey Time and Acquisition Monitoring System (CJAMS). The formula used to calculate the cost of congestion for each link is shown below in Figure 5.1.

TCC = ∑ VOTi ( ∑ Vijt Cijt − ∑ V jt C jt ) i jt jt

Where:

TCC = Total Cost of Congestion Vijt = flow of user class i on link j during time of day period t Cijt = travel time of user class i on link j during time of day period t Cj0 = free-flow travel time on link j (generally observed during the off-peak period) VOTi = value of time for user class i (obtained from the DfT’s Highway Economic Note) Figure 5.1: Total Cost of Congestion equation

5.3.3 Figure 5.2 shows the latest cost of congestion map, (2007/08), displaying the two highest cost bands only: between 100 and 200 GBP and over 200 GBP.

5.3.4 It is possible to visually compare the 2007/08 cost of congestion map with the modelled flows and volume/capacity ratios (VCR) for the 2011 base and 2026 Do-Something scenarios. This will aid the identification of areas of highest congestion, in terms of cost, in 2007/08 and whether the trends continue into the modelled 2011 base and forecast year of 2026 (with all committed and non- committed planned development in Surrey being modelled).

5.3.5 Both the volume of traffic and level of congestion projected to occur in the 2011 base and 2026 Do-Something are represented using a coloured bandwidth plot on the modelled road network. The volume/capacity ratios (VCR) are shown only for links within the study area with a VCR equal to or greater than 1, in Figures 5.3 and 5.4.

5.3.6 The cost of congestion map shown in Figure 5.2 indicates roads in the County that have the highest cost of congestion based on 2007/08 modelled flows and observed journey times, by highlighting the roads in red (indicating a cost greater than 200 GBP). The key parts of the SRN with such costs are:

• M3 junctions 4 to 3;

Issue No. Final Page 43 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

• Majority of the M25 between junctions 13 and 8 as well as junctions 6 and 5 (clockwise and anti-clockwise); • A3 approaching the M25 junction 10 Wisley Interchange (from north and south of the M25); • A3 surrounding Guildford (specifically near Dennis roundabout).

5.3.7 In relation to the LRN, the main areas/corridors shown by the 2007/08 cost of congestion map appear to be: • A31 between Farnham and Guildford; • A245 near the Painshill junction; • A320 St Peter’s Way (as well as other local roads surrounding the M25 junction 11).

5.3.8 Figures 5.3 and 5.4 display the VCR bandwidths for all links in the study area that have a VCR value equal to or greater than 1, for the 2011 base and 2026 Do- Something forecast. The widths of the bands displayed on the modelled links are proportionate to the projected flow. The colour of the bands relate to the VCR value, for example, links coloured orange have a VCR value ranging from 1 to 1.59. A value of 1 was chosen as it is likely that when a VCR value between 0.85 and 1 is reached it is likely that the flow conditions will decrease thus increasing the likelihood of flow breakdown, congestion and increased journey times. Therefore a VCR value of 1 relates to more certainty of congestion than 0.85.

5.3.9 Figure 5.3 indicates that the links with the highest VCR values (indicated by dark red bands) in the 2011 base are generally located external to Surrey, such as: • A24 (travelling northbound and into the County) near Horsham; • A23 (travelling northbound and into the County) near Crawley; • A22 (travelling northbound and into the County) at Haywards Heath.

5.3.10 The areas of the SRN that incur largest corridors of congestion in 2011 are: • M3 junctions 4a to 2 (northbound); • M25 junctions 13 to 14 (clockwise); • A3 between A31 and Dennis Roundabout (northbound); • A3 at the Hook junction (northbound and southbound).

5.3.11 With reference to the LRN the main areas of congestion in the 2011 base are: • A31 approaching Farnham (from the south but travelling northbound); • A245 Portsmouth Rd (either side of the Painshill junction).

5.3.12 Figure 5.4 displays VCR bandwidths for the 2026 Do-Something. The VCR bandwidths that have a value equal to or greater than 1 appear to be relatively similar to the 2011 base. This infers that there are not any new, large, areas of congestion projected to occur in 2026 as a result of the committed and non- committed planned future development. However, one area of increased congestion in 2026 (but actually occurs in the 2026 Do-Nothing – compare Figures 5.5 and 5.6 in section 5.4) is apparent on the A3 (travelling northbound) between the Ripley junction and the M25 junction 10 Wisley Interchange.

5.3.13 In relation to comparisons between the cost of congestion map for 2007/08 and the VCR bandwidths for the modelled base year of 2011 and 2026 Do- Something, it appears that similar areas of congestion are being represented. Figures 5.2 (2007/08 cost of congestion map) to 5.4 (2026 Do-Something VCR plot) all highlight the following roads to have high monetary costs and values of congestion:

Issue No. Final Page 44 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

• M3 junctions 3 to 4 (northbound); • M25 junctions 13 to 14 (clockwise); • A245 Portsmouth Rd (west of the A3 Painshill junction); • A31 Alton Rd (northbound) (approaching and through Farnham) • A3 Portsmouth Rd (northbound) (between Ripley junction and M25 junction 10 Wisley Interchange)

5.3.14 Roads that are presented in Figures 5.2 to 5.4 as having high costs of congestion and VCR values over 1, are areas currently thought to be congested (based on observed journey times) and are thought to continue to have high levels of congestion until the forecast year of 2026 (based on modelled flows).

Issue No. Final Page 45 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Figure 5.2: 2007/08 Cost of Congestion map for Surrey

Issue No. Final Page 46 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Key N VCR 1.00 – 1.59 VCR 1.60 – 1.65 VCR 1.66 +

Scale 3,500 vph

Figure 5.3: 2011 base traffic volumes and VCR (VCR values greater than 1 displayed only).

Issue No. Final Page 47 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Key N VCR 1.00 – 1.59 VCR 1.60 – 1.65 VCR 1.66 +

Scale 3,500 vph

Figure 5.4: 2026 Do-Something traffic volumes and VCR (VCR values greater than 1 displayed only)

Issue No. Final Page 48 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

5.4 Volume/Capacity Ratio

5.4.1 Figures 5.5 to 5.7 display the estimated flows and VCRs for all modelled links in the study area. VCR bandwidths are only displayed for links with a VCR equal to or greater than 0.85.

5.4.2 Figure 5.5 displays the projected flows and VCR for the 2011 base. A visual interpretation indicates that the main areas of the County projected to incur some of the highest levels of flow and congestion in the 2011 base are: • A3 Portsmouth Rd, Hindhead - travelling northbound prior to the Hindhead crossroads; • A31 Farnham Rd, Guildford – travelling eastbound prior to the Guildford gyratory; • A245 Portsmouth Rd, Painshill – travelling westbound after the A3 Painshill junction; • M3 J4a to 2 (M25 J12 Thorpe Interchange) – travelling northbound; • A3 Guildford By-pass – travelling northbound between junctions with the A31 and Dennis roundabout; • A31 Alton Road, Farnham – travelling eastbound approaching the Coxbridge roundabout; • M25 junctions 13 to 14 – travelling clockwise.

5.4.3 Figure 5.5 also indicates that areas outside of the County are estimated to incur relatively significant levels of congestion, specifically Horsham, Crawley and East Grinstead. However, an element of caution should be used when analysing areas external to the County as the level of network coding is not as precise due to these areas being outside of the models main area of purpose.

5.4.4 Figure 5.6 displays volumes of traffic and congestion in the 2026 Do-Nothing. The 2026 Do-Nothing represents relatively similar bandwidths as the 2011 base for the LRN. This relates to no development occurring in the study area but the rest of the Country growthed to 2026 forecasts. However, small differences can be seen on the SRN when comparing the 2026 Do-Nothing to the 2011 base. For example the VCR values have changed from the ranges of 0.91 - 0.95 to 0.96 –0.99 on the M25 between junctions 5 and 6 (clockwise and anti-clockwise). Areas external to the County that incur an increase in VCR in the 2026 Do- Nothing (when compared to the 2011 base) is the B2026 Balcombe Road travelling northbound (into the County) from the south near Horsham and the A23 London Road travelling northbound (into the County) from the south (Crawley).

5.4.5 Visual observations of the 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something VCR plots indicate that there are no significant increases in congestion between the two scenarios. However, an area of the SRN projected to experience an increase in flow and therefore congestion, is the M25 between junctions 9 and 8 (anti- clockwise) with an increased VCR value of over 0.85. Increases in congestion are also projected on the LRN in the 2026 Do-Something. The most noticeable being the A31 Hogs Back (eastbound) increasing from a value range between 0.91 and 0.95 to 0.96 and 0.99. The A331 Blackwater Valley Route (BVR) northbound incurs increased congestion as a larger stretch has a VCR value over 0.85 in the 2026 Do-Something. These roads are not part of the SRN but form key routes in an east to west and north to south direction through the County.

Issue No. Final Page 49 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Key N VCR 0.85 – 0.90 VCR 0.91 – 0.95 VCR 0.96 – 0.99 VCR 1.00 – 1.59 VCR 1.60 – 1.65 VCR 1.66 +

Scale 3,500 vph

Figure 5.5: 2011 base traffic volumes and VCR

Issue No. Final Page 50 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Key N VCR 0.85 – 0.90 VCR 0.91 – 0.95 VCR 0.96 – 0.99 VCR 1.00 – 1.59 VCR 1.60 – 1.65 VCR 1.66 +

Scale 3,500 vph

Figure 5.6: 2026 Do-Nothing traffic volumes and VCR

Issue No. Final Page 51 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Key N VCR 0.85 – 0.90 VCR 0.91 – 0.95

VCR 0.96 – 0.99

VCR 1.00 – 1.59

VCR 1.60 – 1.65

VCR 1.66 +

Scale 3,500 vph

Figure 5.7: 2026 Do-Something traffic volumes and VCR

Issue No. Final Page 52 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

5.4.6 All modelled links within the County were ranked based on the differences between the 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something based on three criteria: absolute difference in flow; percentage difference in flow and differences in VCR. Each of these three criteria have been ranked separately and then summed to provide an overall un-weighted score which has then been ranked (i.e. the lowest score equals the highest ranked link) to define the links likely to experience the greatest negative impacts in terms of increases in flows and congestion. Table 5.7 shows a borough/district proportional breakdown of links within the County that are ranked within the top 25%, 10% and top 100 of all links.

No. of No. of % of top % of top No. of % of links in links in Total no. 25% of 10% of links in % of top total no. top 25 % top 10% of links total total top 100 100 links of links of total of total links links links links links Elmbridge 347 7% 38 3% 17 4% 0 0% Epsom & Ewell 228 5% 54 5% 22 5% 5 5% Guildford 884 19% 207 18% 57 12% 8 8% Mole Valley 492 10% 152 13% 53 11% 6 6% Reigate & Banstead 526 11% 195 17% 85 18% 20 20% Runnymede 285 6% 80 7% 55 12% 21 21% Spelthorne 344 7% 70 6% 21 4% 10 10% Surrey Heath 332 7% 88 7% 46 10% 11 11% Tandridge 320 7% 41 3% 10 2% 0 0% Waverley 507 11% 92 8% 24 5% 3 3% Woking 438 9% 158 13% 80 17% 16 16% Total 4703 100% 1175 100% 470 100% 100 100% Table 5.7: Borough/district breakdown of links based on flow and VCR ranking (based on differences between 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something).

5.4.7 Table 5.7 indicates that the borough of Guildford contains the largest proportion of modelled links within the County, 19% of all modelled links. The borough of Guildford also contains the largest proportion of links ranked in the top 25%, whereas the borough of Reigate & Banstead contains the largest proportion of links in the top10% and the borough of Runnymede contains the largest proportion of links in the top 100 links, to incur the largest increases in flow and VCR values between the 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something.

5.4.8 Table 5.8 shows the top twenty links in the County that are forecast to rank highest in terms of increases in flow and VCR. Therefore the links displayed in Table 5.8 are not the links in the County with the highest VCR values, but are the links that are forecast to incur the largest increases (in flow and VCR values) between the 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something as a result of the future trip generation generated from non-committed development.

5.4.9 Figures 5.8 and 5.9 display the geographic locations of the links shown in Table 5.8.

Issue No. Final Page 53 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Abs Diff % Diff in Abs Diff Ranking based on 2026 DS less 2026 Flow (All Vehicles) VCR in Flow Flow in VCR DN

Link Link Abs Road District Capacity 2026 DS 2026 DS 2026 DS % Diff Abs No. Dir 2026 2026 2026 2026 Diff 2011 2011 less less less in Diff in Score Position DN DS DN DS in 2026 DN 2026 DN 2026 DN Flow Flow VCR

10685 1 (S) A245 Old Woking Rd Woking 1,200 689 670 1,010 0.57 0.56 0.84 340 51% 0.28 2 23 6 31 1 15684 2 (E) Horley Road Reigate & Banstead 800 620 633 896 0.77 0.79 1.12 262 41% 0.33 1 37 16 54 2 16870 1 (E) Trumps Green Rd Runnymede 1,200 761 781 1,092 0.63 0.65 0.91 311 40% 0.26 5 45 10 60 3 10688 1 (S) A245 Old Woking Rd Woking 1,200 661 681 957 0.55 0.57 0.80 276 41% 0.23 6 44 13 63 4 15685 2 (W) Horley Rd Reigate & Banstead 800 531 546 757 0.66 0.68 0.95 211 39% 0.26 3 50 30 83 5 16392 1 (N) Stroude Rd Runnymede 1,700 268 278 502 0.16 0.16 0.30 224 81% 0.13 53 6 26 85 6 16749 2 (E) Chobham Ln Runnymede 1,200 697 718 979 0.58 0.60 0.82 261 36% 0.22 8 66 17 91 7 15699 2 (N) Chertsey Rd Woking 800 247 246 397 0.31 0.31 0.50 151 61% 0.19 13 15 69 97 8 8868 2 (W) Mill Ln Reigate & Banstead 800 323 345 504 0.40 0.43 0.63 159 46% 0.20 11 29 61 101 9 16673 1 (S) Short Ln Spelthorne 1,200 412 494 672 0.34 0.41 0.56 178 36% 0.15 29 71 40 140 10 15111 1 (W) B382 Woking Rd Woking 1,700 461 452 647 0.27 0.27 0.38 195 43% 0.11 76 36 33 145 11 8814 2 (N) A242 Croydon Rd Reigate & Banstead 800 396 391 535 0.49 0.49 0.67 145 37% 0.18 14 60 72 146 12 9335 1 (S) Long Ln Spelthorne 1,200 434 506 682 0.36 0.42 0.57 176 35% 0.15 31 75 43 149 13 16861 2 (E) B3407 High St Runnymede 800 513 397 539 0.64 0.50 0.67 142 36% 0.18 16 72 76 164 14 15112 2 (W) B382 Woking Rd Woking 1,700 499 497 687 0.29 0.29 0.40 190 38% 0.11 85 52 35 172 15 8458 1 (W) B3367 Monkton Ln Waverley 800 228 104 217 0.29 0.13 0.27 113 109% 0.14 35 3 143 181 16 16753 2 (E) B386 Holloway Hill Runnymede 1,700 1,843 1,848 2,290 1.08 1.09 1.35 442 24% 0.26 4 177 1 182 17 15914 1 (E) Green Lane Runnymede 1,200 975 914 1,146 0.81 0.76 0.95 232 25% 0.19 12 153 24 189 18 16769 2 (E) Norlands Lane Spelthorne 1,700 197 221 384 0.12 0.13 0.23 163 74% 0.10 130 9 55 194 19 16474 2 (S) Pooley Green Rd Runnymede 1,200 324 233 367 0.27 0.19 0.31 134 57% 0.11 87 20 93 200 20 Table 5.8: Top 20 links in Surrey likely to incur largest increases in flow and VCR between 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something

Values highlighted in green have a VCR value ranging between 0.85 and 1. Values highlighted in orange have a VCR value ranging between 1 and 1.59.

Issue No. Final Page 54 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Key N Ranking relating to 1 links in Table 5.8

2 5 9

Figure 5.8: Location of links ranked in top 20, to incur largest increases in flow and VCR between 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something, East of the County

Issue No. Final Page 55 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

N 13

14 20

6 19 3

17 18

1 4 8 11 15

Key Ranking relating to 1 16 links in Table 5.8

Figure 5.9: Location of links ranked in top 20, to incur largest increases in flow and VCR between 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something, West of the County

Issue No. Final Page 56 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

5.4.10 The majority of links in Table 5.8 do not have VCR values that exceed 0.85. Out of the twenty links to incur the largest increases in flow and VCR in the 2026 Do- Something, eight of these links are within the borough of Runnymede.

5.4.11 Out of the links ranked in Table 5.8, Horley Rd (eastbound) and the B386 Holloway Hill (eastbound) have the highest VCR values in the 2026 Do- Something, 1.12 and 1.35 respectively. These links are ranked 2nd and 17th in Table 5.8.

5.4.12 The majority of links in Table 5.8 are in close proximity to/are within the zones that are projected to incur the largest increase in trip ends (specifically origins/departures) between the 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something, (refer to Tables 4.9 and 4.10). For example Horley Road is detailed in Table 5.8 and zone 264 (Horley – Meath Green) is in Table 4.9, and as such Horley Rd is located within zone 264. This trend also occurs with zone 379 (Ottershaw) as Chobham Ln, Trumps Green and Stroude Ln are located in close proximity to the centroid of this zone. Zone 274 (West Byfleet Town Centre) features as having some of the largest increases in origin (departure) trip ends between the 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something (see Table 4.9) and as such links in close proximity to this zone, A245/B382 Old Woking Rd, are featured in Table 5.8.

5.4.13 Figures 5.8 and 5.9 indicate a trend occurring, by many of the twenty links being in close proximity to each other, and thus forming small corridors of increased flow and levels of congestion. Three of these corridors being: • Horley Rd/Mill Ln, westbound (Reigate & Banstead); • Chobham Ln, Trumps Green Rd and Stroude Rd, eastbound/northbound (Runnymede); • A245/B382 Old Woking Rd, westbound (Woking).

5.5 Difference in Flow

5.5.1 Changes in levels of traffic are shown using a bandwidth plot on the road network with comparisons to relevant scenarios. Figures 5.10 and 5.11 show the differences in traffic between the 2011 base and 2026 Do-Nothing as well as differences between the 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something. Bandwidths are displayed for all links within the County and also areas covering large developments that are external to Surrey. By comparing each scenario with their relevant reference it is possible to visualise the increases/decreases in traffic flows on individual links at a County scale.

5.5.2 Where bandwidths are coloured blue, this indicates an increase in flow whereas links coloured red represent a decrease in flow between the two scenarios being compared. The width of the bands displayed for each link is proportional to the increase/decrease in flow.

Issue No. Final Page 57 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Key N Increase in flow for 2026 Do-Nothing Decrease in flow for 2026 Do-Nothing

Scale Approx 300 vph

Figure 5.10: 2026 Do-Nothing less the 2011 base flow (results in the increases/decreases in flow between 2011 and 2026 Do-Nothing being displayed)

Issue No. Final Page 58 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Key N Increase in flow for 2026 Do-Something Decrease in flow for 2026 Do-Something

Scale Approx 300 vph

Figure 5.11: 2026 Do-Something less the 2026 Do-Nothing flow (results in the increases/decreases in flow between 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something being displayed)

Issue No. Final Page 59 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

5.5.3 Figure 5.10 shows a visual display of the increases/decreases in flow between the 2011 base and 2026 Do-Nothing. Therefore this growth only relates to traffic growth outside of the study area of this assessment.

5.5.4 Figure 5.10 indicates that the largest projected increases in flow on the SRN in relation to the study area are: • M25 junction 10 to 8 (anti-clockwise); • M25 junctions 13 to 12 (anti-clockwise); • M23 junctions 8 to 10 (southbound).

5.5.5 Other areas projected to incur relative increases in flow in the 2026 Do-Nothing are external to the County, such as: • A23 southbound at Crawley; • A24 northbound and southbound at Horsham; • A327 northbound and southbound at Fleet.

5.5.6 Figure 5.11 is a bandwidth plot displaying the increases/decreases in flow between the 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something. The majority of links within the study area experience an increase in flow when a comparison is made to the 2026 Do-Nothing. In relation to the SRN the M25 (within Surrey) in general experiences small changes in flow, although the largest increases being in both the clockwise anti-clockwise directions between junctions 11 and 13. All other parts of the SRN in the County also experience an increase in flow, with the largest of these being: • M23 junction 10 to 8 (northbound); • A3 between M25 Wisley Interchange and Painshill (northbound).

5.5.7 With relation to the LRN there are several locations that appear to be prominent within Figure 5.11 (difference in flow between the 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do- Something): • A331 Blackwater Valley Route (BVR) (northbound); • A31 Hogs Back between A331 and Puttenham (eastbound); • Chobham Ln, Trumps Green Rd and Stroude Rd (northbound).

5.5.8 Areas outside of the County that are projected to experience increases in flow in the 2026 Do-Something are: • West of the BVR, specifically Aldershot and the A323 (Hampshire); • Cluster of links surrounding Gatwick and Crawley, specifically the A23 southbound (West Sussex).

5.5.9 Two links within the County that are noticeable in Figure 5.11, and displaying large bandwidths of increased flow, are the B386 Holloway Hill and Green Lane travelling northbound. Both of these links are located in close proximity to each other and form a corridor crossing the M25 at junction 11.

5.5.10 Table 5.9 shows a borough/district proportional breakdown of links within the County, that fall within the top 100 and top 20 of all links to incur largest increases in flow between the 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something.

5.5.11 Table 5.9 indicates that when examining increases in flow, in isolation, the borough of Runnymede contains the largest proportion of links within the top 100 and 20 largest increases in flow in the 2026 Do-Something. When ranking links based on largest increases in flow and congestion (VCR), the borough of Runnymede also contains the largest proportion of higher ranked links in the top 100 ranked links (see Table 5.7).

Issue No. Final Page 60 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Top 100 % of top Top 20 % of top 20 links to 100 links to links to links to Total No. of % of Total incur incur incur incur Links Links largest largest largest largest increase in increase in increase in increase in flow flow flow flow Elmbridge 349 7% 3 3% 0 0% Epsom & Ewell 228 5% 0 0% 0 0% Guildford 893 19% 13 13% 0 0% Mole Valley 490 10% 0 0% 0 0% Reigate & Banstead 528 11% 13 13% 2 10% Runnymede 277 6% 34 34% 12 60% Spelthorne 339 7% 11 11% 2 10% Surrey Heath 332 7% 11 11% 2 10% Tandridge 320 7% 2 2% 0 0% Waverley 507 11% 1 1% 0 0% Woking 440 9% 12 12% 2 10% Total 4703 100% 100 100% 20 100% Table 5.9: Borough/district breakdown of largest increases in flow between 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something

5.5.12 Table 5.10 lists the twenty links in the County that are expected to experience the largest absolute increases in flow between the 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do- Something. The link that is to incur the largest increase in flow in the 2026 Do- Something is the B386 Holloway Hill in Runnymede, with an increase of 442 vehicles (a 24% increase).

5.5.13 Out of the twenty links displayed in Table 5.10 the A245 Old Woking Road (ranked 5th and 10th) and Horley Road (ranked 13th) are the links that incur the largest proportional increase in flow, 51%, 41% and 41% respectively.

5.5.14 A number of links occurring in the twenty largest increases in flow (Table 5.10) also appear in the top twenty ranked links based on increases in flow and VCR (Table 5.8). Such links that occur in both top twenty lists of links are: • A245 Old Woking Rd (Woking); • Trumps Green Rd (Runnymede); • Chobham Ln (Runnymede); • Stroude Rd (Runnymede); • Horley Rd (Reigate & Banstead); • B386 Holloway Hill (Runnymede); • Green Ln (Runnymede). 5.5.15 Figures 5.12 and 5.13 show the geographic locations of the twenty links in that are displayed in Table 5.10.

5.5.16 Figures 5.12 and 5.13 indicate that the majority of the twenty links in Table 5.10 are located in boroughs to the northeast of the County. Second to this, the following corridors of increased flow are apparent: • M25 junctions 12 – 13 (clockwise and anti-clockwise); • Chobham Ln / Trumps Green Rd / Stroude Rd (northbound); • B386 Holloway Hill / Green Ln (eastbound); • A245 Old Woking Rd / B382 Old Woking Rd (westbound); • A331 BVR between A3011 Lynchford Rd junction and M3 junction 4 (northbound).

Issue No. Final Page 61 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Flow (All Vehicles) Absolute Percentage difference difference Link Link Dir Road District Capacity 2026 DS 2026 DS Rank No. 2026 Do- 2026 Do- Nothing Something less 2026 less 2026 DN DN 16753 2 (E) B386 Holloway Hill Runnymede 1,700 1,848 2,290 442 24% 1 10738 2 (S) M25 J12 - 11 Runnymede 5,700 2,781 3,167 386 14% 2 16684 2 (S) M25 J13 - 12 Runnymede 9,500 4,259 4,604 345 8% 3 10740 2 (N) M25 J12 Slip On N’bound Runnymede 3,800 2,597 2,938 341 13% 4 10685 1 (W) A245 Old Woking Rd Woking 1,200 670 1,010 340 51% 5 16652 1 (N) M25 J12 - 13 Runnymede 9,500 7,973 8,298 325 4% 6 16870 1 (E) Trumps Green Road Runnymede 1,200 781 1,092 311 40% 7 12165 2 (N) A331 BVR Surrey Heath 3,500 3,022 3,326 304 10% 8 16853 1 (E) M25 J13 (part of gyratory) Spelthorne 9,500 3,384 3,670 285 8% 9 10688 1 (W) A245 Old Woking Rd Woking 1,200 681 957 276 41% 10 1100 1 (E) A23 Brighton Rd Reigate & Banstead 3,500 1,036 1,310 274 26% 11 12164 2 (N) A331 BVR Surrey Heath 3,500 1,347 1,612 264 20% 12 15684 2 (E) Horley Road Reigate & Banstead 800 633 896 262 41% 13 16749 2 (E) Chobham Lane Runnymede 1,200 718 979 261 36% 14 16855 1 (S) M25 J13 (part of gyratory) Spelthorne 9,500 4,000 4,254 254 6% 15 10742 2 (N) M25 J12 Slip On N’bound Runnymede 3,800 2,175 2,421 247 11% 16 12166 2 (N) A331 BVR Surrey Heath 3,500 2,834 3,069 235 8% 17 17179 1 (W) A331 BVR (part of gyratory south of M3 J4) Surrey Heath 3,500 2,577 2,811 234 9% 18 15914 1 (E) Green Ln Runnymede 1,200 914 1,146 232 25% 19 16392 1 (N) Stroude Rd Runnymede 1,700 278 502 224 81% 20 Table 5.10: Twenty links in the County that are forecast to incur the largest increases in flow between the 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do- Something

Issue No.Final Page 62 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Key N Ranking relating to 1 links in Table 5.10

Issue No.Final Page 63 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Figure 5.13: Location of links ranked in top 20, to incur largest increases in flow and VCR between 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something, east of the County

Issue No.Final Page 64 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Key N Ranking relating to 1 links in Table 5.10 9

6 15

20 3

4 7 2 16

1 19

12 8

Figure 5.12: Location of links ranked in top 20, to incur largest increases in flow and VCR between 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something, west of the County

Issue No.Final Page 65 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

5.6 Merge and Diverge Assessment of the SRN

5.6.1 A form of highway capacity assessment was undertaken on the merge and diverge junctions of the M25 junctions 10 and 11.

5.6.2 The assessment utilised the guidelines in the Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB) using observed flows for 2010 and the modelled flows for the 2011 base, 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something.

5.6.3 The DMRB Volume 6 (Road Geometry) Section 2 (Junctions) was used in conjunction with the mainline and merge and diverge flows of the M25 junctions 10 and 11, to determine the junction layout that is required for each scenario.

5.6.4 It was thought appropriate to also assess the junction layouts for 2010 using observed flows. Therefore observed flows for 2010 were obtained from the Highways Agency’s (HA) Traffic Database System (TRADS) for the average weekday (Monday to Friday) in the month of September (where possible), for the 0800 – 0900 time period. It is important to note that the flows were extracted for the on and off slips of junctions 10 and 11, as well as the initial mainline (junctions 9 to 10 and 12 to 11). Flows for the other sections of the carriageways were calculated using these flows, allowing consistent flows downstream. The 2010 flows that were extracted from TRADS, rounded to nearest fifty vehicles.

5.6.5 Table 5.11 displays the type of merge/diverge junction layouts that have been determined for the M25 junctions 10 and 11, according to the flows and DMRB guidelines. All junction layouts were identified with reference to the merge/diverge graphs and junction diagrams shown in the DMRB (see Appendix D). The existing layout was obtained by use of aerial photographs, whilst the 2010 layouts were determined by use of the observed flows from TRADS. 2011, 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something flows were extracted from the SINTRAM model.

5.6.6 The key for Table 5.11 is as follows: • C1 = Diverge, lane drop at taper diverge; • D2 = Diverge, lane drop at parallel diverge; • E1 = Merge, lane gain; • F1 = Merge, lane gain with ghost island merge (nearside lane of merge is lane gain); • F2 = Merge, lane gain with ghost island merge (offside lane of merge is lane gain).

Existin 2010 2011 2026 DN 2026 DS Merge / Road g Propose Propose Propose Propose Comment Diverge Layout d Layout d Layout d Layout d Layout M25 J10 Slip Off Nbound Diverge D,2 D,2 D,2 D,2 D,2 Constant M25 J10 Slip On Nbound Merge F,1 F,2 F,2 F,2 F,2 Capacity Required M25 J10 Slip Off Sbound Diverge D,2 D,2 D,2 C,1 C,1 Spare Capacity M25 J10 Slip On Sbound Merge F,2 F,2 F,2 E,1 E,1 Spare Capacity M25 J11 Slip Off Nbound Diverge D,2 C,1 C,1 D,2 D,2 Constant M25 J11 Slip On Nbound Merge F,2 F,2 F,2 F,2 F,2 Constant M25 J11 Slip Off Sbound Diverge D,2 D,2 D,2 D,2 D,2 Constant M25 J11 Slip On Sbound Merge F,1 E,1 F,2 F,2 F,2 Capacity Required

Issue No. Final Page 66 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Table 5.11: M25 junctions 10 and 11 assessment of merge/diverge layouts

5.6.7 See Appendix E for diagrammatic interpretations of details shown in Table 5.11.

Issue No. Final Page 67 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

5.6.8 Table 5.11 indicates whether the junctions have spare capacity, require additional capacity or the capacity requirements remain constant. These provisional statements are based on the differences between the existing layout and the 2026 Do-Something proposed layout.

5.6.9 Table 5.11 indicates that the majority of the merges/diverges of the M25 junctions 10 and 11 do not require any additional capacity based on the flows and DRMB guidance. However, two merges are suggesting an increase in additional capacity in the 2026 Do-Something (based on the modelled flows of this assessment), specifically junction 10 slip on northbound and junction 11 slip off southbound. However, the merge requirements for both of these on slip junctions remain constant between the modelled 2011 base and 2026 Do- Something, with a suggested merge layout of a lane gain with a ghost island merge, (offside lane of the merge being the lane gain) (category F,2).

5.6.10 Table 5.12 shows the flows for all sections of the M25 between junctions 10 and 11 and these are the flows that were utilised for the junction layout assessment of the merges and diverges. VCR values are also displayed, cells coloured green have a VCR value equal to or greater than 0.85.

5.6.11 Table 5.12 indicates that the variation in flows on the specified sections of the SRN is minimal between the 2011 and 2026 Do-Something, as the largest change in flow is 178 vehicles between junctions 12 and 11 (southbound). The VCR values for all links in Table 5.12 are below a value of 1, although a number of links encounter a VCR value above 0.85 (suggesting levels of congestion have been reached), specifically in a northbound direction between junctions 10 and 11.

5.6.12 In general both Tables 5.11 and 5.12 indicate that, generally, there is not a need to increase capacity at the merges and diverges of junctions 10 and 11 of the M25, to accommodate traffic generated from the committed and non-committed planned development, and additional Great Britain growth outside Surrey to the forecast year of 2026.

Issue No. Final Page 68 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

Absolute Difference Flows (Car + LGV +HGV) VCR Absolute Difference in Flow in VCR Road 2026 DS 2026 DS 2010 2011 2026 DN 2026 DS 2011 less 2026 DN 2026 DN 2011 2026 DN 2026 DS less 2026 less 2026 Observed Modelled Modelled Modelled 2010 less 2011 less 2011 DN DN M25 J9 - 10 (Nbound) 5,250 7,314 7,339 7,412 0.96 0.97 0.98 2,064 25 73 0.01 0.01 M25 J10 Slip Off Nbound 1,500 2,382 2,406 2,340 0.63 0.63 0.62 882 24 -66 0.00 -0.01 M25 J10 Mainline through junction Nbound 3,750 4,932 4,933 5,072 0.87 0.87 0.89 1,182 1 139 0.00 0.02 M25 J10 Slip On Nbound 2,400 2,297 2,334 2,265 0.60 0.61 0.60 -103 37 -69 0.01 -0.01 M25 J10 - 11 (Nbound) 6,150 7,229 7,268 7,337 0.95 0.96 0.97 1,079 39 69 0.01 0.01 M25 J11 Slip Off Nbound 1,100 1,687 1,753 1,777 0.44 0.46 0.47 587 66 24 0.02 0.01 M25 J11 Mainline through junction Nbound 5,050 5,542 5,515 5,560 0.97 0.97 0.98 492 -27 45 0.00 0.01 M25 J11 Slip On Nbound 1,700 1,350 1,426 1,537 0.36 0.38 0.40 -350 76 111 0.02 0.02 M25 J11 - 12 (Nbound) 6,750 6,892 6,940 7,097 0.91 0.91 0.93 142 48 157 0.00 0.02 M25 J12 - 11 (Sbound) 7,000 5,798 5,871 6,049 0.76 0.77 0.80 -1,202 73 178 0.01 0.03 M25 J11 Slip Off Sbound 1,800 1,302 1,336 1,484 0.34 0.35 0.39 -498 34 148 0.01 0.04 M25 J11 Mainline through junction Sbound 5,200 4,495 4,535 4,566 0.79 0.80 0.80 -705 40 31 0.01 0.00 M25 J11 Slip On Sbound 900 1,509 1,569 1,567 0.40 0.41 0.41 609 60 -2 0.01 0.00 M25 J11 - 10 (Sbound) 6,100 6,005 6,104 6,132 0.79 0.80 0.81 -95 99 28 0.01 0.01 M25 J10 Slip Off Sbound 2,200 991 990 1,059 0.26 0.26 0.28 -1,209 -1 69 0.00 0.02 M25 J11 Mainline though junction Sbound 3,900 5,013 5,114 5,073 0.88 0.90 0.89 1,113 101 -41 0.02 -0.01 M25 J11 Slip On Sbound 1,400 1,276 1,325 1,329 0.34 0.35 0.35 -124 49 4 0.01 0.00 M25 J10 - 9 (Sbound) 5,300 6,289 6,439 6,403 0.83 0.85 0.84 989 150 -36 0.02 -0.01 Table 5.12: Flows and VCR values for the M25 between junctions 10 and 11

Issue No. Final Page 69 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

6 CONCLUSION

6.1 Context

6.1.1 This ‘Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network’ study was undertaken to consider the cumulative impacts of all known future development within Surrey, as well as large developments located externally to the County, with respect to highway capacity, to the likely additional traffic generated by committed and non-committed planned residential and commercial development, as proposed in the emerging Core Strategies of the Local Development Frameworks for the borough and districts in and around Surrey.

6.1.2 The main aims of the cumulative transport assessment were to:

6.1.3 The main objectives of the cumulative transport assessment were to:

6.1.4 The main benefit of this approach was to ensure that any strategic infrastructure requirements identified could be used to support the districts and boroughs needs to produce local Infrastructure Delivery Plans (IDP) using a common and consistent strategic evidence base. This evidence base could also be used to support future bids for Central Government funding for transport infrastructure and services.

6.1.5 2026 trip generation forecasts for the boroughs/districts in Surrey and developments external to the County were derived from combining planning data (sourced from the borough/districts where possible) and the TRICS database. TEMPRO forecasts were utilised for borough/districts and external developments where planning data was absent. 2026 trip generation was then used to

Issue No.Final Page 70 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

generate forecast matrices for the scenarios. An assumption was made in the trip generation process that all trips prior to 2011 are committed by planning permission and all trips post 2011 are non-committed planned estimates.

6.1.6 The modelling of the forecast scenarios enabled broad comparisons to be made between the base and forecast years. The main focus of this report has been the estimated impacts between the 2011 base year (consisting of committed development only), the 2026 Do-Nothing (no development growth in the study area but rest of Country grows to 2026) and the 2026 Do-Something (based on 2026 Do-Nothing but 2011 to 2026 non-committed planned development is added to the study area).

6.1.7 Analysis of the available planning data suggests that in the 2026 Do-Something scenario the modelled zone in Surrey to incur the largest amount of estimated additional departure trips is zone 379 Ottershaw (Runnymede) with a projected increase of 758 departure trips. Whereas zone 383 Addlestone Moor (Runnymede) is projected to gain the largest amount of estimated additional arrival trips, 282 trips. Explanation as to why zone 379 Ottershaw is estimated to incur the largest amount of departure trips is related to the redevelopment of the former Defence Evaluation and Research Agency (DERA) site, that is located in close proximity to the zone in Runnymede. Modelled zones in the borough of Reigate and Banstead are predicted to incur the largest proportion of additional trips in the 2026 Do-Something, compared to all other Surrey borough/districts.

6.1.8 The main outcomes of this cumulative assessment are based on aggregations of modelled outputs from network summary statistics including vehicle kilometrage, travel times and average speeds and the relationships between them. Detailed analysis has been undertaken on the SRN by comparing journey times. Known congestion ‘bottlenecks’ have been assessed by comparing current cost of congestion data against volume capacity ratio plots. Traffic flow and congestion impacts between scenarios have been ranked for both the SRN and LRN and finally a highway capacity assessment has been undertaken on several motorway merges and diverges.

6.2 Traffic Impacts on the SRN in Surrey

6.2.1 In the 2026 Do-Nothing the motorway links experience the largest absolute increase in vehicle kilometres when compared to the 2011 base, (an increase of 7,933 veh kms / 0.7% increase). As a result, the motorway links also experience the largest absolute increase in vehicle hours (an increase of 476 veh hrs / 2.5% increase) and largest decrease in average speed (a decrease of 1.10 kph / 1.7% decrease) in the 2026 Do-Nothing (compared to the 2011 base). It is to be expected that the motorway links incur the largest increases in traffic impacts in the 2026 Do-Nothing (compared to the 2011 base) as the increase in trip ends in the 2026 Do-Nothing occurred external to the study area, so only increase in flow in Surrey relates to long distance trips travelling through the County, which are likely to use the SRN.

6.2.2 The motorway and trunk A road links are not forecast to experience the largest increases in vehicle kilometres or vehicle hours in the 2026 Do-Something (compared to the 2026 Do-Nothing), this occurs on principal A roads. This suggests that as additional trips generated from the 2011 to 2026 non-committed planned development make greater use of the LRN in Surrey.

Issue No.Final Page 71 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

6.2.3 The increases in congestion and flow are relatively minor on the SRN in the 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something, as shown by the minimal increases in journey times. The journey times were assessed for the Surrey sections of the M25, M23, M3 and A3 for the 2011 base, 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do- Something. The largest absolute increase in journey time on the Surrey SRN between the 2011 base and 2026 Do-Nothing is forecast to occur on the M25 between junctions 5 and 14 (clockwise), with an increase of 2 minutes 17 seconds (3.3% increase), with 1 minute 17 seconds of this increase occurring between junctions 5 and 6. Whereas the largest absolute increase in SRN journey time from comparisons between the 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do- Something is on the M3 between junctions 4 and 1 (northbound), with an increase of 1 minute 32 seconds (3.6% increase). Of this 1 minute 32 second increase on the northbound section of the M3, 1 minute and 1 second of the increase is experienced between junctions 3 and 2.

6.2.4 In relation to largest increases in flow on the SRN, these occur in the 2026 Do- Something specifically on the M25 between junctions 11 and 13 (clockwise and anti-clockwise) and the M23 between junctions 10 and 8 (northbound). In relation to the M25, junction 12 to 11 (anti-clockwise) is ranked as the having the second largest absolute increase in flow between the 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something in the County, with an increase in flow of 386 vehicles (14% increase). Second to this, the M25 junction 13 to 12 (anti-clockwise) is forecast as having the third largest increase in flow (345 vehicles / 8% increase) and junction 12 to 13 (clockwise) is expected to incur the sixth largest increase in flow in the County (325 vehicles / 4% increase). In relation to this, the M25 junction 12 slip on northbound is forecast to incur an increase of flow of 247 vehicles (11% increase and ranked sixteenth largest increase in the County).

6.2.5 The sections of the SRN forecast to experience the highest values of congestion (VCR value ranging between 1 and 1.59) in the 2026 Do-Something are the M3 junctions 4 to 1 (northbound), the M25 junction 13 to 14 (clockwise) and the A3 between the Ripley and M25 Wisley Interchange junctions (northbound).

6.2.6 Sections of the SRN are forecast to incur traffic impacts related to the forecast additional development, however the impacts in relation to journey times and flows are not thought to be of such a significance to cause major disruption to the SRN network, under normal AM peak hour travelling conditions.

6.3 Traffic Impacts on the LRN of Surrey

6.3.1 The category of roads forecast to experience the largest absolute increases in vehicle kilometres and vehicle hours in the 2026 Do-Something is the principal A road category. For example, the principal A roads in Surrey are estimated to experience an increase in vehicle kilometres of 28,947 veh kms (3.0% increase) relating to an increase in vehicle hours of 878 veh hrs (4.1% increase).

6.3.2 When observing the ranking of Surrey links based on the largest absolute increases in VCR and flow as well as the percentage increases in flow between the 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something, 18% of the top 10% of total links are in the borough of Reigate and Banstead, and 21% of the top 100 links are in the borough of Runnymede.

6.3.3 All links ranked in the top twenty of increased flow and VCR in the 2026 Do- Something, form part of the LRN in Surrey. From these top twenty links small

Issue No.Final Page 72 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

corridors of increased flow and VCR are apparent in the 2026 Do-Something, three of these being: • Horley Rd/Mill Ln, westbound (Reigate and Banstead); • Chobham Ln, Trumps Green Rd and Stroude Rd, eastbound/northbound (Runnymede); • A245/B382 Old Woking Rd, westbound (Woking).

6.3.4 Many links with high ranking of increased flow and VCR are in the same location or in close proximity to the zones that are to experience the largest amount of additional trips in the 2026 Do-Something. Examples of this are zones 379 (Ottershaw) and zone 264 (Horley – Meath Green) are to experience the largest amount of additional departure trips in the 2026 Do-Something and the Chobham Lane, Stroude Green corridor as well as the Horley Rd/Mill Ln corridors are located near to these zones.

6.3.5 When considering the absolute increases in flow in isolation between the 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something for the LRN, the borough of Runnymede contains 34% links that are in the top 100 links to incur the largest increases in absolute flow, and Runnymede also contains 60% of links in the top 20.

6.3.6 The link forecast to experience the largest increase in absolute flow between the 2026 Do-Nothing and 2026 Do-Something (as a result of additional trips generated from non-committed planned development) is the B386 Holloway Hill eastbound (Runnymede), with an increase of 442 vehicles (a 24% increase).

6.3.7 The main areas/corridors of the LRN in the County to experience largest absolute increases in flow in the 2026 Do-Something are as follows: • B386 Holloway Hill and Green Ln, eastbound (Runnymede); • Chobham Rd, Trumps Green Rd and Stroude Ln, northbound (Runnymede); • A245/B382 Old Woking Rd, southbound (Woking); • A331 BVR (between A3011 Lynchford Rd and M3 junction 4 junctions), northbound (Surrey Heath).

6.4 Summary of Impacts

6.4.1 The main results for both the SRN and LRN are summarised in the table below. The table is based on the greatest changes in flow, density and speed between 2026 Do-Something and 2026 Do Nothing modelled scenarios.

6.4.2 The table highlights sections of both the SRN and LRN within Surrey that are sensitive to reasonably significant increases in traffic flow, exacerbating and prolonging existing levels of congestion, resulting in reduced levels of service and reduced journey time reliability during the am peak hour for local roads in and around urban areas and on the approaches and along the mainline of the SRN.

6.4.3 Corridors of increased flow and congestion have been identified in the 2026 Do- Something and the majority of these are located in the borough of Runnymede, and a reason for the generation of these corridors of increased flow is the proximity to the zones gaining the largest amount of additional trips (departures and arrivals).

6.4.4 As such levels of congestion and flow increase on the majority of LRN links in the County in the 2026 Do-Something, with localised areas experiencing increases in traffic impacts. However, the overall impact of these increases is relatively

Issue No.Final Page 73 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

insignificant as the proportional increases/decreases in vehicle kilometres, vehicle hours and average speeds are relatively minor. For example the largest proportional increase, at a County level, is a 4.9% increase in vehicle hours on B roads in the 2026 Do-Something, when compared to the 2026 Do-Nothing.

6.5 Conclusions

6.5.1 The analysis suggests that although major additional highway capacity infrastructure investment such as motorway widening, or local bypasses is not necessary to meet the demands of future development, other types of highway capital schemes in some urban areas, at key junctions and other sensitive locations will be required in order to promote and manage the additional demand due to the future development. These schemes will not necessarily create additional capacity but which will assist in managing or improving journey time reliability and levels of service by managing the impacts to ensure congestion - both delay and journey time reliability - does not deteriorate beyond current levels.

6.5.2 Given that providing additional capacity is no longer considered to be the best solution except in certain locations and for particular circumstances, a mix of solutions will be required involving a wide range of tools. This mix of solutions includes demand management, integrated land use & transport planning, network management, traffic management, freight & goods management and behavioural change. Many of these solutions are contained within Surrey’s recently adopted Surrey Transport Plan (STP3) which include strategies and associated toolkits to provide adequate mitigation measures and assist in the formulation of robust Infrastructure Delivery Plans.

6.5.3 The results and analysis of this cumulative assessment of future development impacts in Surrey, have been presented and endorsed by the ‘Surrey Infrastructure Project Board’ in July 2011.

Issue No.Final Page 74 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network

6.6 Limitations of Study

6.6.1 Given the strategic nature of the highway capacity assessment and modelling methodology used there are a number of limitations which need to be considered during the preparation and interpretation of the highway capacity impacts on both the SRN and LRN within this report which are set out below.

6.6.2 The results presented in this report are based on local planning estimates from the emerging Core Strategies of the boroughs and districts, which are all at different stages within the LDF process, and are based on estimates available as of February 2010, hence, any future changes to the size and distribution of housing and commercial provision may alter the impacts and interpretation of the analysis of this assessment.

6.6.3 The limitations of the planning estimates (such as the varying degrees of available planning data internally and external to Surrey and the uncertainty of the size, distribution and land-use of any future planned developments) the interpretation of the likely impacts on both the SRN and LRN within this assessment should be treated as broad strategic projections, and as such further work would be recommended, (including complementary analysis using appropriate modelling \ assessment tools), to further assist in the identification of additional infrastructure needs and other potential mitigation measures at a more local and detailed level.

6.6.4 The cumulative county-wide transport assessment assumes that all the committed and non-committed planned estimates of development would occur simultaneously and that any impacts described in this report do not account for any possible mitigation, demand management or infrastructure provision and effectively present a worse case situation.

Issue No.Final Page 75 Document No. 3380\SICP\01 Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

CUMULATIVE ASSESSMENT OF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS ON THE HIGHWAY NETWORK

Final Report APPENDICES

Appendix A – Modelled Zone Plans of Surrey Borough \ Districts

Appendix B – Origin & Destination Trip Ends for Modelled Zones in Surrey

Appendix C – Flow Charts detailing Forecasting Methodologies

Appendix D – DMRB Volume 6 Section 2 Junction Layout Geometry Guidance

Appendix E – Assessment of M25 Junctions based on DMRB Guidance

Issue No.Final Page 73 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Appendix A – Modelled Zone Plans of Surrey Borough \ Districts

Issue No.Final Page 74 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Elmbridge N

Centroid Connector * Zone Number 152 Zone Boundary

Issue No.Final Page 75 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Epsom & Ewell

Centroid Connector * Zone Number 152 Zone Boundary

Issue No.Final Page 76 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Guildford

Centroid Connector * Zone Number 152 Zone Boundary

Issue No.Final Page 77 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Mole Valley

Centroid Connector * Zone Number 152 Zone Boundary

Issue No.Final Page 78 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Reigate & Banstead

N Centroid Connector * Zone Number 152 Zone Boundary

Issue No.Final Page 79 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Runnymede

Centroid Connector * Zone Number 152 Zone Boundary

Issue No.Final Page 80 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Spelthorne

N Centroid Connector *

Zone Number 152 Zone Boundary

Issue No.Final Page 81 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Surrey Heath

Centroid Connector * Zone Number 152 Zone Boundary

Issue No.Final Page 82 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Tandridge

N Centroid Connector * Zone Number 152 Zone Boundary

Issue No.Final Page 83 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Waverley

Centroid Connector * Zone Number 152 Zone Boundary

Issue No.Final Page 84 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Woking

Centroid Connector * Zone Number 152 Zone Boundary

Issue No.Final Page 85 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Appendix B – Origin & Destination Trip Ends for Modelled Zones in Surrey

Issue No.Final Page 86 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Depature (Origin) trip ends For all modelled zones in SUrrey Absolute Percentage Departure/Origin Trip Ends Differences Differences Zone Zone Name Borough/District 2026 2026 DS 2026 DN 2026 DS No. 2026 Do- 2026 Do- 2011 DN less less less less Nothing Something 2011 2026 DN 2011 2026 DN 379 Ottershaw Runnymede 754 754 1,512 0 758 0% 101% 264 Horley - Meath Green Reigate & Banstead 978 978 1,518 0 540 0% 55% 274 W Byfleet Town Centre Woking 209 209 677 0 468 0% 224% 365 Deepcut & Mytchett Surrey Heath 508 508 833 0 325 0% 64% 275 Woking Town Centre Woking 145 145 459 0 314 0% 217% 73 Ash & Normandy Guildford 2,434 2,434 2,649 0 215 0% 9% 105 Redhill - Marketfield Way Reigate & Banstead 764 764 939 0 175 0% 23% 393 Kingswood Reigate & Banstead 695 695 847 0 152 0% 22% 272 Reigate - Gatton Park & Wray Park Reigate & Banstead 367 367 513 0 146 0% 40% 186 Woking - Knaphill / St Johns Woking 1,640 1,640 1,774 0 134 0% 8% 312 Redhill - Marketfield Way Reigate & Banstead 103 103 234 0 131 0% 127% 166 Horley Town Centre Reigate & Banstead 656 656 780 0 124 0% 19% 110 Reigate - Reigate Rd / Linkfield Corner Reigate & Banstead 494 494 614 0 120 0% 24% 415 Leathead Mole Valley 1,004 1,004 1,124 0 120 0% 12% 461 Epsom - Longmead & Horton Hospitals East Epsom & Ewell 680 680 793 0 113 0% 17% 452 Ashford Common Spelthorne 926 926 1,036 0 110 0% 12% 398 Merstham Reigate & Banstead 872 872 979 0 107 0% 12% 462 Ewell - Ruxley Lane Epsom & Ewell 744 744 848 0 104 0% 14% 279 Guildford - Park Barn Guildford 1,113 1,113 1,212 0 99 0% 9% 396 Nork Reigate & Banstead 852 852 951 0 99 0% 12% 463 Ewell - West Ewell Epsom & Ewell 773 773 872 0 99 0% 13% 400 Burgh Heath & Preston Reigate & Banstead 287 287 385 0 98 0% 34% 378 Virginia Water Runnymede 603 603 695 0 92 0% 15% 318 Guildford - Stoughton Guildford 1,180 1,180 1,267 0 87 0% 7% 362 Bagshot Surrey Heath 739 739 825 0 86 0% 12% 424 Walton on Thames Elmbridge 734 734 820 0 86 0% 12% 397 Banstead Reigate & Banstead 712 712 794 0 82 0% 12% 298 Guildford - Rydes Hill Guildford 950 950 1,028 0 78 0% 8%

Issue No.Final Page 87 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Absolute Percentage Departure/Origin Trip Ends Differences Differences Zone Zone Name Borough/District 2026 2026 DS 2026 DN 2026 DS No. 2026 Do- 2026 Do- 2011 DN less less less less Nothing Something 2011 2026 DN 2011 2026 DN 446 Laleham Spelthorne 840 840 915 0 75 0% 9% 392 Salfords Reigate & Banstead 397 397 470 0 73 0% 18% 455 West Bedfont Spelthorne 933 933 1,005 0 72 0% 8% 395 Tadworth & Walton on the Hill Reigate & Banstead 691 691 762 0 71 0% 10% 445 Staines - Laleham Rd Spelthorne 821 821 891 0 70 0% 9% 516 Woking Station Woking 40 40 110 0 70 0% 175% 371 Camberly - Riverside & Watchetts Surrey Heath 435 435 504 0 69 0% 16% 464 Ewell - Kingston Rd Epsom & Ewell 630 630 697 0 67 0% 11% 347 Limpsfield Tandridge 448 448 513 0 65 0% 15% 394 Chipstead & Hooley Reigate & Banstead 709 709 774 0 65 0% 9% 119 Horsley - East Horsley & Effingham Guildford 821 821 883 0 62 0% 8% 187 Staines - Station / Knowle Green Spelthorne 780 780 840 0 60 0% 8% 453 Ashford Town Centre Spelthorne 796 796 856 0 60 0% 8% 458 Epsom - south east Epsom & Ewell 684 684 744 0 60 0% 9% 459 Ewell - Ewell Village Epsom & Ewell 622 622 682 0 60 0% 10% 429 Esher Elmbridge 635 635 693 0 58 0% 9% 450 Sunbury & Kempton Park Spelthorne 973 973 1,031 0 58 0% 6% 448 Staines - Kingston Rd (east) Spelthorne 857 857 914 0 57 0% 7% 164 Redhill – Town Centre Reigate & Banstead 337 337 391 0 54 0% 16% 408 Dorking – south Mole Valley 846 846 900 0 54 0% 6% 300 Farnham - Weydon Ln & Shortheath Waverley 462 462 514 0 52 0% 11% 423 Brookland - Brooklands & St Georges Hill Elmbridge 683 683 734 0 51 0% 7% 344 Oxted Tandridge 743 743 793 0 50 0% 7% 419 Leatherhead - south Mole Valley 563 563 613 0 50 0% 9% 535 Guildford - Merrow Common Guildford 524 524 574 0 50 0% 10% 447 Halliford - Halliford Spelthorne 674 674 723 0 49 0% 7% 456 Epsom - Hospital Epsom & Ewell 669 669 718 0 49 0% 7% 343 Godstone Tandridge 747 747 795 0 48 0% 6% 432 Weybridge Elmbridge 482 482 530 0 48 0% 10% 444 Shepperton Spelthorne 698 698 746 0 48 0% 7%

Issue No.Final Page 88 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Absolute Percentage Departure/Origin Trip Ends Differences Differences Zone Zone Name Borough/District 2026 2026 DS 2026 DN 2026 DS No. 2026 Do- 2026 Do- 2011 DN less less less less Nothing Something 2011 2026 DN 2011 2026 DN 466 Worcester Park Epsom & Ewell 725 725 773 0 48 0% 7% 518 Reigate - Doversgreen & South Pk Reigate & Banstead 829 829 877 0 48 0% 6% 465 Stoneleigh East Epsom & Ewell 603 603 650 0 47 0% 8% 311 Woking - Brewery Rd Woking 375 375 421 0 46 0% 12% 336 Farnham - Weybourne W Waverley 458 458 504 0 46 0% 10% 431 Walton on Thames Reservoirs Elmbridge 862 862 908 0 46 0% 5% 350 Chelsham Tandridge 582 582 627 0 45 0% 8% 449 Stanwell Spelthorne 778 778 823 0 45 0% 6% 454 Sunbury Common Spelthorne 1,078 1,078 1,123 0 45 0% 4% 185 Woking - Kingfield Woking 113 113 157 0 44 0% 39% 353 Hurst Green Tandridge 753 753 797 0 44 0% 6% 372 Camberly - York Town Surrey Heath 663 663 707 0 44 0% 7% 80 Guildford - Belfields Guildford 666 666 709 0 43 0% 6% 366 Camberly Surrey Heath 434 434 477 0 43 0% 10% 467 Stoneleigh West Epsom & Ewell 465 465 508 0 43 0% 9% 339 Godalmng - Charterhouse Waverley 509 509 551 0 42 0% 8% 360 Caterham - North Tandridge 534 534 576 0 42 0% 8% 545 University of Surrey Guildford 389 389 431 0 42 0% 11% 341 Binscombe Waverley 545 545 586 0 41 0% 8% 451 Ashford Station Spelthorne 824 824 865 0 41 0% 5% 333 Cranleigh East Waverley 786 786 826 0 40 0% 5% 340 Farncombe Waverley 501 501 541 0 40 0% 8% 383 Addlestone Moor Runnymede 818 818 858 0 40 0% 5% 94 Guildford - Burpham Guildford 958 958 997 0 39 0% 4% 278 Guildford - Onslow Village Guildford 603 603 642 0 39 0% 6% 332 Farnham - Hale Waverley 583 583 622 0 39 0% 7% 376 Redhill – Town Centre Reigate & Banstead 96 96 135 0 39 0% 41% 417 Ashtead – south Mole Valley 470 470 509 0 39 0% 8% 331 Wrecclesham Waverley 480 480 518 0 38 0% 8% 357 Caterham – West Tandridge 488 488 526 0 38 0% 8%

Issue No.Final Page 89 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Absolute Percentage Departure/Origin Trip Ends Differences Differences Zone Zone Name Borough/District 2026 2026 DS 2026 DN 2026 DS No. 2026 Do- 2026 Do- 2011 DN less less less less Nothing Something 2011 2026 DN 2011 2026 DN 288 Redhill - Brighton Rd Reigate & Banstead 181 181 218 0 37 0% 20% 262 Woking - Maybury Rd area Woking 305 305 341 0 36 0% 12% 299 Woking – Sheerwater Woking 375 375 411 0 36 0% 10% 313 Redhill - St Johns Reigate & Banstead 347 347 383 0 36 0% 10% 329 Hindhead Waverley 479 479 515 0 36 0% 8% 99 Guildford - Charlotteville Guildford 582 582 617 0 35 0% 6% 116 Horley - East Reigate & Banstead 206 218 253 12 35 6% 16% 418 Dorking - north Mole Valley 566 566 601 0 35 0% 6% 420 Ashtead - village Mole Valley 657 657 692 0 35 0% 5% 359 Caterham - Station Tandridge 442 442 476 0 34 0% 8% 427 Cobham - Fairmile Elmbridge 532 532 565 0 33 0% 6% 430 AshleyPk & Rydens Elmbridge 728 728 761 0 33 0% 5% 471 Farnham - The Bournes Waverley 336 336 369 0 33 0% 10% 113 Redhill - Earlswood Reigate & Banstead 492 492 524 0 32 0% 7% 328 Haslemere Waverley 471 471 503 0 32 0% 7% 413 Bookham Mole Valley 626 626 658 0 32 0% 5% 327 Haslemere - Shottermill Waverley 693 693 724 0 31 0% 4% 352 Lingfield Tandridge 438 438 469 0 31 0% 7% 355 Warlingham Tandridge 405 405 436 0 31 0% 8% 438 West Molesey - Industrial Estate & Hospital Elmbridge 745 745 776 0 31 0% 4% 106 Reigate - Reigate Hill Reigate & Banstead 183 183 213 0 30 0% 16% 123 Epsom Town Centre Epsom & Ewell 362 362 392 0 30 0% 8% 132 Woking - Goldsworth (east) Woking 779 779 809 0 30 0% 4% 281 Chilworth & Gomshall Guildford 779 779 809 0 30 0% 4% 399 Tattenham Reigate & Banstead 825 825 855 0 30 0% 4% 390 Egham Runnymede 375 375 404 0 29 0% 8% 422 Oxshott & Stoke D Abernon Elmbridge 531 531 560 0 29 0% 5% 358 Caterham Town Centre Tandridge 423 423 451 0 28 0% 7% 425 Cobham Town Centre Elmbridge 644 644 672 0 28 0% 4% 287 Redhill - Redstone Hill & Kingswood Business Centre Reigate & Banstead 234 234 261 0 27 0% 12%

Issue No.Final Page 90 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Absolute Percentage Departure/Origin Trip Ends Differences Differences Zone Zone Name Borough/District 2026 2026 DS 2026 DN 2026 DS No. 2026 Do- 2026 Do- 2011 DN less less less less Nothing Something 2011 2026 DN 2011 2026 DN 294 Send Guildford 678 678 705 0 27 0% 4% 434 Walton Lane & Portmore Elmbridge 478 478 505 0 27 0% 6% 325 Cranleigh Town Centre Waverley 437 437 463 0 26 0% 6% 337 Godalming - Busbridge Waverley 428 428 454 0 26 0% 6% 364 Chobham Surrey Heath 378 378 404 0 26 0% 7% 412 Fetcham - south Mole Valley 500 500 526 0 26 0% 5% 503 Farnham - Weybourne E Waverley 272 272 298 0 26 0% 10% 162 Hogsback Guildford 836 836 860 0 24 0% 3% 309 Farnham - Firgrove Hill Waverley 278 278 302 0 24 0% 9% 377 Camberly - Crawley Ridge Surrey Heath 495 495 519 0 24 0% 5% 384 Englefield Green Runnymede 720 720 744 0 24 0% 3% 443 West Molesey - Hurst Rd Elmbridge 781 781 805 0 24 0% 3% 519 Worplesdon Guildford 857 857 881 0 24 0% 3% 302 Reigate - Reigate Heath Reigate & Banstead 89 89 112 0 23 0% 26% 354 Caterham - South Tandridge 430 430 453 0 23 0% 5% 391 Staines – Town Centre & Pooley Green Runnymede 691 691 714 0 23 0% 3% 414 Fetcham – north Mole Valley 491 491 514 0 23 0% 5% 410 Great Bookham Mole Valley 650 650 672 0 22 0% 3% 439 East Molesey Elmbridge 690 690 712 0 22 0% 3% 460 Ewell - East Ewell Epsom & Ewell 712 712 734 0 22 0% 3% 342 Bletchingley & South Nutfield Tandridge 819 819 840 0 21 0% 3% 407 Holmwood Mole Valley 784 784 805 0 21 0% 3% 122 Epsom Station Epsom & Ewell 223 223 243 0 20 0% 9% 421 Ashtead – station Mole Valley 557 557 577 0 20 0% 4% 428 Hersham Elmbridge 614 614 634 0 20 0% 3% 367 Camberly Heath Surrey Heath 581 581 600 0 19 0% 3% 436 Walton on Thames Ambleside & Fieldcommon Elmbridge 502 502 521 0 19 0% 4% 297 Shalford Guildford 548 548 566 0 18 0% 3% 124 Farnham Hospitals Waverley 278 278 295 0 17 0% 6% 134 Guildford - Millmead & The Mount Guildford 362 362 379 0 17 0% 5%

Issue No.Final Page 91 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Absolute Percentage Departure/Origin Trip Ends Differences Differences Zone Zone Name Borough/District 2026 2026 DS 2026 DN 2026 DS No. 2026 Do- 2026 Do- 2011 DN less less less less Nothing Something 2011 2026 DN 2011 2026 DN 541 Drummond Road Guildford 403 403 420 0 17 0% 4% 546 Guildford Business Park Guildford 300 300 317 0 17 0% 6% 104 Clandon Guildford 228 228 244 0 16 0% 7% 273 Reigate - Nutley Ln area & Reigate Business Park Reigate & Banstead 310 310 326 0 16 0% 5% 276 Reigate – Woodhatch Reigate & Banstead 508 508 524 0 16 0% 3% 98 Farnham - West St Waverley 385 385 400 0 15 0% 4% 127 Farnham Town Centre Waverley 159 159 174 0 15 0% 9% 356 Caterham – Chaldon Tandridge 221 221 236 0 15 0% 7% 389 Coopers Hill Runnymede 749 749 764 0 15 0% 2% 409 Betchwoth & Brockham Mole Valley 459 459 474 0 15 0% 3% 532 Tormead Guildford 205 205 220 0 15 0% 7% 107 Compton Guildford 214 214 228 0 14 0% 7% 373 Frimley Green Surrey Heath 525 525 539 0 14 0% 3% 401 Capel Mole Valley 421 421 435 0 14 0% 3% 404 Westcott Mole Valley 235 235 249 0 14 0% 6% 433 Oatlands Park Elmbridge 667 667 681 0 14 0% 2% 75 Badshot Lea Waverley 332 332 345 0 13 0% 4% 95 Guildford - Merrow Guildford 469 469 482 0 13 0% 3% 114 Redhill - Earlswood Common Reigate & Banstead 117 117 130 0 13 0% 11% 137 London Road Guildford 313 313 326 0 13 0% 4% 265 Guildford - Merrow Downs Guildford 316 316 329 0 13 0% 4% 282 Pirbright Guildford 651 651 664 0 13 0% 2% 295 Ripley Guildford 362 362 375 0 13 0% 4% 348 Woldingham Tandridge 297 297 310 0 13 0% 4% 385 Chertsey Runnymede 886 886 899 0 13 0% 1% 426 Burwood Park & Hersham south Elmbridge 662 662 675 0 13 0% 2% 551 Farnham Road Hospital Guildford 237 237 250 0 13 0% 5% 71 Alice Holt Waverley 102 102 114 0 12 0% 12% 310 Guildford - Pewley Hill Guildford 234 234 246 0 12 0% 5% 441 Thames Ditton Elmbridge 753 753 765 0 12 0% 2%

Issue No.Final Page 92 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Absolute Percentage Departure/Origin Trip Ends Differences Differences Zone Zone Name Borough/District 2026 2026 DS 2026 DN 2026 DS No. 2026 Do- 2026 Do- 2011 DN less less less less Nothing Something 2011 2026 DN 2011 2026 DN 289 Redhill - Station Reigate & Banstead 36 36 47 0 11 0% 31% 317 Guildfordd - Woodbridge & Walnut Tree Close Guildford 418 418 429 0 11 0% 3% 361 Whyteleaf Tandridge 445 445 456 0 11 0% 2% 405 Charlwood Mole Valley 282 282 293 0 11 0% 4% 517 Woking - Heathside Woking 109 109 120 0 11 0% 10% 72 Artington Guildford 115 115 125 0 10 0% 9% 411 Mickleham & Westhumble Mole Valley 269 269 279 0 10 0% 4% 440 Hinchley Wood Elmbridge 435 435 445 0 10 0% 2% 126 Farnham Station Waverley 131 131 140 0 9 0% 7% 315 Staines Moor Spelthorne 145 145 154 0 9 0% 6% 363 West End Surrey Heath 376 376 385 0 9 0% 2% 536 Boxgrove Guildford 166 166 175 0 9 0% 5% 552 Slyfield Residential Guildford 276 276 285 0 9 0% 3% 108 Farnham - Compton Waverley 121 121 129 0 8 0% 7% 135 Millmead Guildford 127 127 135 0 8 0% 6% 290 Reigate Town Centre Reigate & Banstead 134 134 142 0 8 0% 6% 291 Ockham & Wisley Guildford 121 121 129 0 8 0% 7% 406 BeareGreen Mole Valley 215 215 223 0 8 0% 4% 502 Horsley - West Horsley Guildford 376 376 384 0 8 0% 2% 521 Woking - Goldsworth (east) Woking 39 39 47 0 8 0% 21% 523 Bisley Surrey Heath 345 345 353 0 8 0% 2% 538 Abbotswood Guildford 169 169 177 0 8 0% 5% 121 Epsom - cinema car parks Epsom & Ewell 90 90 97 0 7 0% 8% 163 Redhill - Holmethorpe East Reigate & Banstead 394 394 401 0 7 0% 2% 369 Lightwater Surrey Heath 513 513 520 0 7 0% 1% 370 Windlsham Surrey Heath 378 378 385 0 7 0% 2% 514 Woking - Hospital Woking 128 128 135 0 7 0% 5% 548 Bedford Road Guildford 159 159 166 0 7 0% 4% 109 Runfold Waverley 117 117 123 0 6 0% 5% 125 Farnham Park Waverley 95 95 101 0 6 0% 6%

Issue No.Final Page 93 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Absolute Percentage Departure/Origin Trip Ends Differences Differences Zone Zone Name Borough/District 2026 2026 DS 2026 DN 2026 DS No. 2026 Do- 2026 Do- 2011 DN less less less less Nothing Something 2011 2026 DN 2011 2026 DN 269 Woking - Mount Hermon Woking 334 334 340 0 6 0% 2% 319 Frensham & Tilford Waverley 400 400 406 0 6 0% 2% 346 Smallflield Tandridge 726 726 732 0 6 0% 1% 351 Felbridge Tandridge 245 245 251 0 6 0% 2% 381 Row Town Runnymede 661 661 667 0 6 0% 1% 435 Claygate Elmbridge 721 721 727 0 6 0% 1% 172 Guildfd - RSCH & Research Park Guildford 92 92 97 0 5 0% 5% 260 Stoke Park South Guildford 85 85 90 0 5 0% 6% 263 Woking – Maybury Woking 279 279 284 0 5 0% 2% 321 Bramley & Winkworth Arboretum Waverley 405 405 410 0 5 0% 1% 345 Dormansland Tandridge 489 489 494 0 5 0% 1% 349 Tatsfield Tandridge 223 223 228 0 5 0% 2% 387 New Haw Runnymede 662 662 667 0 5 0% 1% 320 Elstead & Thursley Waverley 549 549 553 0 4 0% 1% 322 Chiddingfold & Dunsfold Waverley 376 376 380 0 4 0% 1% 323 Witley Waverley 371 371 375 0 4 0% 1% 324 Alfold Waverley 177 177 181 0 4 0% 2% 330 Milford Waverley 397 397 401 0 4 0% 1% 402 Ockley Mole Valley 165 165 169 0 4 0% 2% 416 Headley Mole Valley 326 326 330 0 4 0% 1% 457 Epsom - Horton Hospitals West & The Wells Epsom & Ewell 526 526 530 0 4 0% 1% 92 Woking - Arthurs Bridge Woking 73 73 76 0 3 0% 4% 93 Brookwood Woking 274 274 277 0 3 0% 1% 96 Byfleet Woking 826 826 829 0 3 0% 0% 261 Woking - Maybury East Woking 410 410 413 0 3 0% 1% 296 Shacklefd / Eashing Guildford 141 141 144 0 3 0% 2% 301 Woking - Six Crossroads Woking 200 200 203 0 3 0% 2% 308 South Earlswood Reigate & Banstead 155 155 158 0 3 0% 2% 314 Guildford - St Marthas Hill Guildford 53 53 56 0 3 0% 6% 316 Staines - Two Rivers Spelthorne 35 35 38 0 3 0% 9%

Issue No.Final Page 94 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Absolute Percentage Departure/Origin Trip Ends Differences Differences Zone Zone Name Borough/District 2026 2026 DS 2026 DN 2026 DS No. 2026 Do- 2026 Do- 2011 DN less less less less Nothing Something 2011 2026 DN 2011 2026 DN 326 Ewhurst Waverley 283 283 286 0 3 0% 1% 334 Shamley Green Waverley 200 200 203 0 3 0% 2% 335 Wonersh Waverley 235 235 238 0 3 0% 1% 375 Frimley Ridge & Heatherside Surrey Heath 591 591 594 0 3 0% 1% 403 Abinger & Ranmore Commons Mole Valley 237 237 240 0 3 0% 1% 442 Long Ditton Elmbridge 829 829 832 0 3 0% 0% 469 Worplesdon Station & Sutton Green Woking 286 286 289 0 3 0% 1% 474 Woking - Triggs Lane Woking 77 77 80 0 3 0% 4% 477 Guildford Park Epsom & Ewell 54 54 57 0 3 0% 6% 524 Woking - Carthouse Ln Woking 40 40 43 0 3 0% 8% 534 Stoke Park North Guildford 121 121 124 0 3 0% 2% 78 Woking - Mayford Woking 212 212 214 0 2 0% 1% 117 Woking - Egley Rd Woking 68 68 70 0 2 0% 3% 120 Epsom - Art College Epsom & Ewell 26 26 28 0 2 0% 8% 133 Eastgate North Guildford 40 40 42 0 2 0% 5% 136 Guildfd Town Centre Guildford 55 55 57 0 2 0% 4% 165 Woking - Hook Heath Woking 292 292 294 0 2 0% 1% 167 Woking – Horsell Woking 306 306 308 0 2 0% 1% 168 Woking - Horsell Common Woking 215 215 217 0 2 0% 1% 259 Woking - Parley Drive Woking 237 237 239 0 2 0% 1% 267 Woking – Westfield Woking 255 255 257 0 2 0% 1% 268 Woking – Hoebridge Woking 71 71 73 0 2 0% 3% 277 Old Woking Woking 461 461 463 0 2 0% 0% 283 Pyrford Woking 210 210 212 0 2 0% 1% 284 Pyrford Green Woking 188 188 190 0 2 0% 1% 292 Woking – Kingsway Woking 65 65 67 0 2 0% 3% 306 Slyfield Industrial Guildford 322 322 324 0 2 0% 1% 374 Frimley & Frimley Hospital Surrey Heath 556 556 558 0 2 0% 0% 382 Addlestone Town Centre Runnymede 674 674 676 0 2 0% 0% 388 Addlestone residential & Ham Moor Runnymede 732 732 734 0 2 0% 0%

Issue No.Final Page 95 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Absolute Percentage Departure/Origin Trip Ends Differences Differences Zone Zone Name Borough/District 2026 2026 DS 2026 DN 2026 DS No. 2026 Do- 2026 Do- 2011 DN less less less less Nothing Something 2011 2026 DN 2011 2026 DN 468 Farnham - Dippenhall Waverley 30 30 32 0 2 0% 7% 515 Woking - Leisure Centre Woking 146 146 148 0 2 0% 1% 522 Woking - Goldsworth (east) Woking 35 35 37 0 2 0% 6% 525 Woking - Carthouse Ln Woking 45 45 47 0 2 0% 4% 539 The Bars Guildford 69 69 71 0 2 0% 3% 540 Leapale Road Guildford 48 48 50 0 2 0% 4% 542 Eastgate South Guildford 48 48 50 0 2 0% 4% 543 Tunsgate Guildford 27 27 29 0 2 0% 7% 293 Horley - Haroldslea Reigate & Banstead 69 69 70 0 1 0% 1% 504 East Surrey Hospital & Whitebushes Reigate & Banstead 188 188 189 0 1 0% 1% 544 Millbrook Guildford 29 29 30 0 1 0% 3% 547 Guildford Bus Station Guildford 16 16 17 0 1 0% 6% 549 Guildford Rail Station Guildford 61 61 62 0 1 0% 2% 550 Farnham Road Car Park Guildford 12 12 13 0 1 0% 8% 271 Horley - North East Reigate & Banstead 642 642 642 0 0 0% 0% 338 Godalming Town Centre Waverley 519 519 519 0 0 0% 0% 368 Camberley - Collingwood College Surrey Heath 404 404 404 0 0 0% 0% 380 West Byfleet - Woodham Runnymede 517 517 517 0 0 0% 0% 437 Thames Ditton - Weston Green Elmbridge 393 393 393 0 0 0% 0% 526 Artington P&R Guildford 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 527 Burpham P&R Guildford 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 528 Gravetts Lane P&R Guildford 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 529 A3 West P&R Guildford 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 530 Manor Park P&R Guildford 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 531 Merrow P&R Guildford 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 533 Spectrum P&R Guildford 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 280 W Byfleet - Parvis Rd Woking 191 191 186 0 -5 0% -3% 386 Thorpe Runnymede 707 707 701 0 -6 0% -1%

Issue No.Final Page 96 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Arrival (DESTINATION) trip ends For all modelled zones in SUrrey Absolute Percentage Arrival/Destination Trip Ends Differences Differences Zone Zone Name Borough/District 2026 2026 DS 2026 DN 2026 DS No. 2026 Do- 2026 Do- 2011 DN less less less less Nothing Something 2011 2026 DN 2011 2026 DN 383 Addlestone Moor Runnymede 1,208 1,209 1,491 1 282 0% 23% 387 New Haw Runnymede 533 534 736 1 202 0% 38% 264 Horley - Meath Green Reigate & Banstead 1,130 1,131 1,286 1 155 0% 14% 519 Worplesdon Guildford 780 780 926 0 146 0% 19% 186 Woking - Knaphill / St Johns Woking 1,806 1,808 1,951 2 143 0% 8% 518 Reigate - Doversgreen & South Pk Reigate & Banstead 944 945 1,076 1 131 0% 14% 73 Ash & Normandy Guildford 1,958 1,959 2,080 1 121 0% 6% 105 Redhill - Marketfield Way Reigate & Banstead 759 760 877 1 117 0% 15% 382 Addlestn Town Centre Runnymede 708 709 819 1 110 0% 16% 398 Merstham Reigate & Banstead 902 903 1,013 1 110 0% 12% 380 West Byfleet - Woodham Runnymede 465 466 570 1 104 0% 22% 166 Horley Town Centre Reigate & Banstead 710 711 808 1 97 0% 14% 374 Frimley & Frimley Hospital Surrey Heath 936 937 1,032 1 95 0% 10% 110 Reigate - Reigate Rd / Linkfield Corner Reigate & Banstead 542 543 630 1 87 0% 16% 381 Row Town Runnymede 677 677 762 0 85 0% 13% 407 Holmwood Mole Valley 1,339 1,340 1,424 1 84 0% 6% 271 Horley - North East Reigate & Banstead 472 473 554 1 81 0% 17% 278 Guildford - Onslow Village Guildford 1,110 1,111 1,190 1 79 0% 7% 385 Chertsey Runnymede 1,192 1,193 1,272 1 79 0% 7% 272 Reigate - Gatton Park & Wray Park Reigate & Banstead 458 459 533 1 74 0% 16% 343 Godstone Tandridge 721 721 790 0 69 0% 10% 276 Reigate - Woodhatch Reigate & Banstead 576 576 644 0 68 0% 12% 397 Banstead Reigate & Banstead 991 991 1,058 0 67 0% 7% 386 Thorpe Runnymede 1,043 1,044 1,110 1 66 0% 6% 373 Frimley Green Surrey Heath 619 620 684 1 64 0% 10% 279 Guildford - Park Barn Guildford 973 974 1,035 1 61 0% 6% 445 Staines - Laleham Rd Spelthorne 1,009 1,010 1,071 1 61 0% 6% 80 Guildford - Belfields Guildford 910 910 970 0 60 0% 7%

Issue No.Final Page 97 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Absolute Percentage Arrival/Destination Trip Ends Differences Differences Zone Zone Name Borough/District 2026 2026 DS 2026 DN 2026 DS No. 2026 Do- 2026 Do- 2011 DN less less less less Nothing Something 2011 2026 DN 2011 2026 DN 313 Redhill - St Johns Reigate & Banstead 422 423 483 1 60 0% 14% 336 Farnham - Weybourne W Waverley 593 594 653 1 59 0% 10% 375 Frimley Ridge & Heatherside Surrey Heath 729 730 789 1 59 0% 8% 446 Laleham Spelthorne 887 887 946 0 59 0% 7% 392 Salfords Reigate & Banstead 386 387 445 1 58 0% 15% 408 Dorking - south Mole Valley 1,104 1,105 1,162 1 57 0% 5% 119 Horsley - East Horsley & Effingham Guildford 660 661 717 1 56 0% 8% 298 Guildford - Rydes Hill Guildford 1,067 1,068 1,124 1 56 0% 5% 318 Guildford - Stoughton Guildford 1,127 1,128 1,184 1 56 0% 5% 344 Oxted Tandridge 779 779 835 0 56 0% 7% 277 Old Woking Woking 446 446 501 0 55 0% 12% 460 Ewell - East Ewell Epsom & Ewell 870 871 926 1 55 0% 6% 132 Woking - Goldsworth (east) Woking 784 785 839 1 54 0% 7% 164 Redhill – Town Centre Reigate & Banstead 399 399 453 0 54 0% 14% 399 Tattenham Reigate & Banstead 915 916 970 1 54 0% 6% 420 Ashtead – village Mole Valley 766 766 820 0 54 0% 7% 391 Staines – Town Centre & Pooley Green Runnymede 841 842 895 1 53 0% 6% 458 Epsom - south east Epsom & Ewell 815 815 868 0 53 0% 7% 459 Ewell - Ewell Village Epsom & Ewell 683 683 736 0 53 0% 8% 379 Ottershaw Runnymede 950 950 1,002 0 52 0% 5% 448 Staines - Kingston Rd (east) Spelthorne 1,084 1,085 1,136 1 51 0% 5% 452 Ashford Common Spelthorne 960 960 1,011 0 51 0% 5% 96 Byfleet Woking 856 856 905 0 49 0% 6% 261 Woking - Maybury East Woking 393 393 442 0 49 0% 12% 300 Farnham - Weydon Ln & Shortheath Waverley 531 531 580 0 49 0% 9% 456 Epsom - Hospital Epsom & Ewell 752 753 802 1 49 0% 7% 297 Shalford Guildford 533 533 581 0 48 0% 9% 299 Woking - Sheerwater Woking 357 358 406 1 48 0% 13% 187 Staines - Station / Knowle Green Spelthorne 928 929 976 1 47 0% 5%

Issue No.Final Page 98 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Absolute Percentage Arrival/Destination Trip Ends Differences Differences Zone Zone Name Borough/District 2026 2026 DS 2026 DN 2026 DS No. 2026 Do- 2026 Do- 2011 DN less less less less Nothing Something 2011 2026 DN 2011 2026 DN 388 Addlestone residential & Ham Moor Runnymede 637 638 685 1 47 0% 7% 342 Bletchingley & South Nutfield Tandridge 932 933 979 1 46 0% 5% 395 Tadworth & Walton on the Hill Reigate & Banstead 619 619 665 0 46 0% 7% 332 Farnham – Hale Waverley 629 630 675 1 45 0% 7% 405 Charlwood Mole Valley 434 434 479 0 45 0% 10% 418 Dorking – north Mole Valley 692 693 738 1 45 0% 6% 447 Halliford Spelthorne 734 735 780 1 45 0% 6% 462 Ewell - Ruxley Lane Epsom & Ewell 827 828 873 1 45 0% 5% 463 Ewell - West Ewell Epsom & Ewell 797 798 843 1 45 0% 6% 262 Woking - Maybury Rd area Woking 353 353 397 0 44 0% 12% 396 Nork Reigate & Banstead 897 898 941 1 43 0% 5% 162 Hogsback Guildford 644 644 686 0 42 0% 7% 167 Woking - Horsell Woking 299 300 342 1 42 0% 14% 415 Leatherhead Mole Valley 999 1,000 1,042 1 42 0% 4% 457 Epsom - Horton Hospitals West & The Wells Epsom & Ewell 480 480 522 0 42 0% 9% 113 Redhill - Earlswood Reigate & Banstead 362 363 404 1 41 0% 11% 341 Binscombe Waverley 591 591 632 0 41 0% 7% 423 Brooklands & St Georges Hill Elmbridge 800 800 841 0 41 0% 5% 417 Ashtead - south Mole Valley 507 508 548 1 40 0% 8% 443 West Molesey - Hurst Rd Elmbridge 930 931 971 1 40 0% 4% 353 Hurst Grn Tandridge 796 797 836 1 39 0% 5% 367 Camberly Heath Surrey Heath 723 724 762 1 38 0% 5% 377 Camberly - Crawley Ridge Surrey Heath 745 745 783 0 38 0% 5% 269 Woking - Mount Hermon Woking 302 302 339 0 37 0% 12% 340 Farncombe Waverley 593 593 630 0 37 0% 6% 365 Deepcut & Mytchett Surrey Heath 382 382 419 0 37 0% 10% 410 Great Bookham Mole Valley 571 571 608 0 37 0% 6% 431 Walton on Thames Reservoirs Elmbridge 811 812 849 1 37 0% 5% 461 Epsom - Longmead & Horton Hospitals East Epsom & Ewell 730 731 768 1 37 0% 5%

Issue No.Final Page 99 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Absolute Percentage Arrival/Destination Trip Ends Differences Differences Zone Zone Name Borough/District 2026 2026 DS 2026 DN 2026 DS No. 2026 Do- 2026 Do- 2011 DN less less less less Nothing Something 2011 2026 DN 2011 2026 DN 464 Ewell - Kingston Rd Epsom & Ewell 594 594 631 0 37 0% 6% 346 Smallfield Tandridge 740 741 777 1 36 0% 5% 413 Bookham Mole Valley 647 648 684 1 36 0% 6% 426 Burwood Park & Hersham south Elmbridge 764 765 801 1 36 0% 5% 453 Ashford Town Centre Spelthorne 700 700 736 0 36 0% 5% 545 University of Surrey Guildford 710 711 747 1 36 0% 5% 116 Horley – East Reigate & Banstead 236 254 289 18 35 8% 14% 263 Woking – Maybury Woking 267 267 302 0 35 0% 13% 347 Limpsfield Tandridge 551 551 586 0 35 0% 6% 370 Windlsham Surrey Heath 406 406 441 0 35 0% 9% 393 Kingswood Reigate & Banstead 457 458 493 1 35 0% 8% 421 Ashtead - station Mole Valley 558 559 594 1 35 0% 6% 430 Ashley Park & Rydens Elmbridge 835 836 871 1 35 0% 4% 433 Oatlands Park Elmbridge 670 671 706 1 35 0% 5% 444 Shepperton Spelthorne 713 714 749 1 35 0% 5% 454 Sunbury Common Spelthorne 1,353 1,354 1,389 1 35 0% 3% 123 Epsom Town Centre Epsom & Ewell 398 398 432 0 34 0% 9% 284 Pyrford Green Woking 211 211 245 0 34 0% 16% 425 Cobham Town Centre Elmbridge 699 699 733 0 34 0% 5% 311 Woking - Brewery Rd Woking 431 431 464 0 33 0% 8% 371 Camberly - Riverside & Watchetts Surrey Heath 548 548 581 0 33 0% 6% 389 Coopers Hill Runnymede 953 954 987 1 33 0% 3% 419 Leatherhead south Mole Valley 533 533 566 0 33 0% 6% 301 Woking - Six Crossroads Woking 298 298 330 0 32 0% 11% 424 Walton on Thames Elmbridge 719 719 751 0 32 0% 4% 428 Hersham Elmbridge 706 707 739 1 32 0% 5% 94 Guildford - Burpham Guildford 841 841 872 0 31 0% 4% 281 Chilworth & Gomshall Guildford 759 760 791 1 31 0% 4% 283 Pyrford Woking 197 197 228 0 31 0% 16%

Issue No.Final Page 100 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Absolute Percentage Arrival/Destination Trip Ends Differences Differences Zone Zone Name Borough/District 2026 2026 DS 2026 DN 2026 DS No. 2026 Do- 2026 Do- 2011 DN less less less less Nothing Something 2011 2026 DN 2011 2026 DN 306 Slyfield Industrial Guildford 752 753 784 1 31 0% 4% 412 Fetcham - south Mole Valley 508 508 539 0 31 0% 6% 414 Fetcham - north Mole Valley 486 487 518 1 31 0% 6% 471 Farnham - The Bournes Waverley 372 372 403 0 31 0% 8% 99 Guildford - Charlotteville Guildford 582 583 613 1 30 0% 5% 339 Godalmng - Charterhouse Waverley 537 538 568 1 30 0% 6% 359 Caterham - Station Tandridge 508 509 539 1 30 0% 6% 329 Hindhead Waverley 1,229 1,230 1,259 1 29 0% 2% 432 Weybridge Elmbridge 484 484 513 0 29 0% 6% 95 Guildford - Merrow Guildford 566 567 595 1 28 0% 5% 165 Woking - Hook Heath Woking 322 322 350 0 28 0% 9% 364 Chobham Surrey Heath 324 324 352 0 28 0% 9% 390 Egham Runnymede 665 666 694 1 28 0% 4% 282 Pirbright Guildford 589 589 616 0 27 0% 5% 288 Redhill - Brighton Rd Reigate & Banstead 180 180 207 0 27 0% 15% 360 Caterham - North Tandridge 699 699 726 0 27 0% 4% 124 Farnham Hospitals Waverley 313 313 339 0 26 0% 8% 287 Redhill - Redstone Hill & Kingswood Business Centre Reigate & Banstead 246 246 272 0 26 0% 11% 331 Wrecclesham Waverley 651 652 678 1 26 0% 4% 401 Capel Mole Valley 351 351 377 0 26 0% 7% 294 Send Guildford 519 520 545 1 25 0% 5% 333 Cranleigh East Waverley 536 536 561 0 25 0% 5% 337 Godalming - Busbridge Waverley 460 460 485 0 25 0% 5% 345 Dormansland Tandridge 737 738 763 1 25 0% 3% 467 Stoneleigh West Epsom & Ewell 517 518 543 1 25 0% 5% 321 Bramley & Winkworth Arboretum Waverley 599 600 624 1 24 0% 4% 434 Walton Lane & Portmore Elmbridge 426 426 450 0 24 0% 6% 338 Godalming Town Centre Waverley 505 506 529 1 23 0% 5% 384 Englefield Green Runnymede 981 982 1,005 1 23 0% 2%

Issue No.Final Page 101 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Absolute Percentage Arrival/Destination Trip Ends Differences Differences Zone Zone Name Borough/District 2026 2026 DS 2026 DN 2026 DS No. 2026 Do- 2026 Do- 2011 DN less less less less Nothing Something 2011 2026 DN 2011 2026 DN 438 West Molesey - Industrial Estate & Hospital Elmbridge 734 735 758 1 23 0% 3% 122 Epsom Station Epsom & Ewell 245 245 267 0 22 0% 9% 352 Lingfield Tandridge 443 443 465 0 22 0% 5% 429 Esher Elmbridge 608 608 630 0 22 0% 4% 504 East Surrey Hospital & Whitebushes Reigate & Banstead 123 123 145 0 22 0% 18% 541 Drummond Road Guildford 406 407 429 1 22 0% 5% 309 Farnham - Firgrove Hill Waverley 242 242 263 0 21 0% 9% 357 Caterham – West Tandridge 580 580 601 0 21 0% 4% 358 Caterham Town Centre Tandridge 478 478 499 0 21 0% 4% 400 Burgh Heath & Preston Reigate & Banstead 281 282 303 1 21 0% 7% 416 Headley Mole Valley 251 251 272 0 21 0% 8% 422 Oxshott & Stoke D Abernon Elmbridge 627 627 648 0 21 0% 3% 427 Cobham - Fairmile Elmbridge 469 470 491 1 21 0% 4% 435 Claygate Elmbridge 618 618 639 0 21 0% 3% 449 Stanwell Spelthorne 863 864 885 1 21 0% 2% 72 Artington Guildford 456 457 477 1 20 0% 4% 78 Woking - Mayford Woking 204 204 224 0 20 0% 10% 98 Farnham - West St Waverley 396 396 416 0 20 0% 5% 273 Reigate - Nutley Ln area & Reigate Business Park Reigate & Banstead 260 260 280 0 20 0% 8% 354 Caterham – South Tandridge 365 365 385 0 20 0% 5% 372 Camberly - York Town Surrey Heath 508 509 529 1 20 0% 4% 451 Ashford Station Spelthorne 632 633 653 1 20 0% 3% 106 Reigate - Reigate Hill Reigate & Banstead 192 192 211 0 19 0% 10% 327 Haslemere - Shottermill Waverley 789 790 809 1 19 0% 2% 369 Lightwater Surrey Heath 368 368 387 0 19 0% 5% 409 Betchworth & Brockham Mole Valley 293 294 313 1 19 0% 6% 411 Mickleham & Westhumble Mole Valley 274 274 293 0 19 0% 7% 436 Walton on Thames Ambleside & Fieldcommon Elmbridge 516 516 535 0 19 0% 4% 168 Woking - Horsell Common Woking 151 151 169 0 18 0% 12%

Issue No.Final Page 102 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Absolute Percentage Arrival/Destination Trip Ends Differences Differences Zone Zone Name Borough/District 2026 2026 DS 2026 DN 2026 DS No. 2026 Do- 2026 Do- 2011 DN less less less less Nothing Something 2011 2026 DN 2011 2026 DN 280 West Byfleet - Parvis Rd Woking 194 194 212 0 18 0% 9% 295 Ripley Guildford 346 346 364 0 18 0% 5% 350 Chelsham Tandridge 619 619 637 0 18 0% 3% 366 Camberly Surrey Heath 458 458 476 0 18 0% 4% 376 Redhill – Town Centre Reigate & Banstead 103 103 121 0 18 0% 17% 551 Farnham Road Hospital Guildford 408 408 426 0 18 0% 4% 348 Woldingham Tandridge 303 303 320 0 17 0% 6% 362 Bagshot Surrey Heath 580 580 597 0 17 0% 3% 368 Camberley - Collingwood College Surrey Heath 427 428 445 1 17 0% 4% 439 East Molesey Elmbridge 611 611 628 0 17 0% 3% 450 Sunbury & Kempton Park Spelthorne 1,174 1,175 1,192 1 17 0% 1% 75 Badshot Lea Waverley 232 232 248 0 16 0% 7% 114 Redhill - Earlswood Common Reigate & Banstead 101 101 117 0 16 0% 16% 259 Woking - Parley Drive Woking 233 233 249 0 16 0% 7% 317 Guildford - Woodbridge & Walnut Tree Close Guildford 325 325 341 0 16 0% 5% 325 Cranleigh Town Centre Waverley 366 366 382 0 16 0% 4% 404 Westcott Mole Valley 200 200 216 0 16 0% 8% 514 Woking – Hospital Woking 130 130 146 0 16 0% 12% 515 Woking - Leisure Centre Woking 142 142 158 0 16 0% 11% 546 Guildford Business Park Guildford 454 454 470 0 16 0% 4% 127 Farnham Town Centre Waverley 207 207 222 0 15 0% 7% 134 Guildford - Millmead & The Mount Guildford 327 328 343 1 15 0% 5% 163 Redhill - Holmethorpe East Reigate & Banstead 149 150 165 1 15 1% 10% 265 Guildford - Merrow Downs Guildford 207 207 222 0 15 0% 7% 274 West Byfleet Town Centre Woking 170 170 185 0 15 0% 9% 308 South Earlswood Reigate & Banstead 91 91 106 0 15 0% 16% 469 Worplesdon Station & Sutton Green Woking 286 287 302 1 15 0% 5% 517 Woking - Heathside Woking 120 120 135 0 15 0% 13% 523 Bisley Surrey Heath 331 332 347 1 15 0% 5%

Issue No.Final Page 103 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Absolute Percentage Arrival/Destination Trip Ends Differences Differences Zone Zone Name Borough/District 2026 2026 DS 2026 DN 2026 DS No. 2026 Do- 2026 Do- 2011 DN less less less less Nothing Something 2011 2026 DN 2011 2026 DN 535 Guildford - Merrow Common Guildford 343 344 359 1 15 0% 4% 293 Horley - Haroldslea Reigate & Banstead 104 104 118 0 14 0% 13% 319 Frensham & Tilford Waverley 318 319 333 1 14 0% 4% 355 Warlingham Tandridge 507 508 522 1 14 0% 3% 137 London Road Guildford 287 288 301 1 13 0% 5% 312 Redhill - Marketfield Way Reigate & Banstead 79 80 93 1 13 1% 16% 361 Whyteleaf Tandridge 558 558 571 0 13 0% 2% 93 Brookwood Woking 252 252 264 0 12 0% 5% 310 Guildford - Pewley Hill Guildford 322 322 334 0 12 0% 4% 442 Long Ditton Elmbridge 933 934 946 1 12 0% 1% 538 Abbotswood Guildford 256 257 269 1 12 0% 5% 267 Woking - Westfield Woking 199 199 210 0 11 0% 6% 268 Woking - Hoebridge Woking 83 83 94 0 11 0% 13% 302 Reigate - Reigate Heath Reigate & Banstead 98 98 109 0 11 0% 11% 320 Elstead & Thursley Waverley 261 261 272 0 11 0% 4% 349 Tatsfield Tandridge 176 176 187 0 11 0% 6% 437 Thames Ditton - Weston Green Elmbridge 366 367 378 1 11 0% 3% 503 Farnham - Weybourne E Waverley 141 141 152 0 11 0% 8% 126 Farnham Station Waverley 127 127 137 0 10 0% 8% 290 Reigate Town Centre Reigate & Banstead 122 122 132 0 10 0% 8% 296 Shackleford / Eashing Guildford 137 137 147 0 10 0% 7% 363 West End Surrey Heath 220 220 230 0 10 0% 5% 378 Virginia Water Runnymede 424 425 435 1 10 0% 2% 455 West Bedfont Spelthorne 741 741 751 0 10 0% 1% 548 Bedford Road Guildford 186 186 196 0 10 0% 5% 71 Alice Holt Waverley 97 97 106 0 9 0% 9% 109 Runfold Waverley 107 107 116 0 9 0% 8% 121 Epsom - cinema car parks Epsom & Ewell 111 111 120 0 9 0% 8% 125 Farnham Park Waverley 114 114 123 0 9 0% 8%

Issue No.Final Page 104 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Absolute Percentage Arrival/Destination Trip Ends Differences Differences Zone Zone Name Borough/District 2026 2026 DS 2026 DN 2026 DS No. 2026 Do- 2026 Do- 2011 DN less less less less Nothing Something 2011 2026 DN 2011 2026 DN 260 Stoke Park South Guildford 108 108 117 0 9 0% 8% 326 Ewhurst Waverley 236 236 245 0 9 0% 4% 351 Felbridge Tandridge 335 335 344 0 9 0% 3% 356 Caterham - Chaldon Tandridge 245 245 254 0 9 0% 4% 466 Worcester Park Epsom & Ewell 825 826 835 1 9 0% 1% 502 Horsley - West Horsley Guildford 230 230 239 0 9 0% 4% 107 Compton Guildford 142 142 150 0 8 0% 6% 108 Farnham - Compton Waverley 107 107 115 0 8 0% 7% 185 Woking - Kingfield Woking 77 77 85 0 8 0% 10% 330 Milford Waverley 290 290 298 0 8 0% 3% 532 Tormead Guildford 156 156 164 0 8 0% 5% 536 Boxgrove Guildford 180 181 189 1 8 1% 4% 552 Slyfield Residential Guildford 200 201 209 1 8 1% 4% 92 Woking - Arthurs Bridge Woking 69 69 76 0 7 0% 10% 172 Guildfd - RSCH & Research Park Guildford 119 119 126 0 7 0% 6% 315 Staines Moor Spelthorne 199 199 206 0 7 0% 4% 440 Hinchley Wood Elmbridge 421 421 428 0 7 0% 2% 477 Guildford Park Epsom & Ewell 90 90 97 0 7 0% 8% 135 Millmead Guildford 129 129 135 0 6 0% 5% 289 Redhill – Station Reigate & Banstead 41 41 47 0 6 0% 15% 292 Woking – Kingsway Woking 66 66 72 0 6 0% 9% 322 Chiddingfold & Dunsfold Waverley 364 365 371 1 6 0% 2% 328 Haslemere Waverley 609 610 616 1 6 0% 1% 474 Woking - Triggs Lane Woking 80 80 86 0 6 0% 8% 117 Woking - Egley Rd Woking 56 56 61 0 5 0% 9% 323 Witley Waverley 329 330 335 1 5 0% 2% 334 Shamley Green Waverley 158 158 163 0 5 0% 3% 335 Wonersh Waverley 135 135 140 0 5 0% 4% 406 BeareGreen Mole Valley 148 148 153 0 5 0% 3%

Issue No.Final Page 105 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Absolute Percentage Arrival/Destination Trip Ends Differences Differences Zone Zone Name Borough/District 2026 2026 DS 2026 DN 2026 DS No. 2026 Do- 2026 Do- 2011 DN less less less less Nothing Something 2011 2026 DN 2011 2026 DN 441 Thames Ditton Elmbridge 966 966 971 0 5 0% 1% 516 Woking Station Woking 47 47 52 0 5 0% 11% 104 Clandon Guildford 117 117 121 0 4 0% 3% 133 Eastgate North Guildford 42 42 46 0 4 0% 10% 402 Ockley Mole Valley 203 203 207 0 4 0% 2% 465 Stoneleigh East Epsom & Ewell 610 610 614 0 4 0% 1% 522 Woking - Goldsworth (east) Woking 33 33 37 0 4 0% 12% 534 Stoke Park North Guildford 98 98 102 0 4 0% 4% 539 The Bars Guildford 75 75 79 0 4 0% 5% 542 Eastgate South Guildford 60 60 64 0 4 0% 7% 275 Woking Town Centre Woking 32 32 35 0 3 0% 9% 394 Chipstead & Hooley Reigate & Banstead 686 687 690 1 3 0% 0% 521 Woking - Goldsworth (east) Woking 30 30 33 0 3 0% 10% 540 Leapale Road Guildford 50 50 53 0 3 0% 6% 120 Epsom - Art College Epsom & Ewell 29 29 31 0 2 0% 7% 136 Guildfd Town Centre Guildford 60 60 62 0 2 0% 3% 291 Ockham & Wisley Guildford 78 78 80 0 2 0% 3% 314 Guildford - St Marthas Hill Guildford 63 63 65 0 2 0% 3% 324 Alfold Waverley 207 207 209 0 2 0% 1% 403 Abinger & Ranmore Commons Mole Valley 160 161 163 1 2 1% 1% 524 Woking - Carthouse Ln Woking 36 36 38 0 2 0% 6% 543 Tunsgate Guildford 32 32 34 0 2 0% 6% 316 Staines - Two Rivers Spelthorne 44 44 45 0 1 0% 2% 525 Woking - Carthouse Ln Woking 18 18 19 0 1 0% 6% 544 Millbrook Guildford 40 40 41 0 1 0% 3% 547 Guildford Bus Station Guildford 16 16 17 0 1 0% 6% 549 Guildford Rail Station Guildford 18 18 19 0 1 0% 6% 550 Farnham Road Car Park Guildford 25 25 26 0 1 0% 4% 468 Farnham - Dippenhall Waverley 31 31 31 0 0 0% 0%

Issue No.Final Page 106 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Absolute Percentage Arrival/Destination Trip Ends Differences Differences Zone Zone Name Borough/District 2026 2026 DS 2026 DN 2026 DS No. 2026 Do- 2026 Do- 2011 DN less less less less Nothing Something 2011 2026 DN 2011 2026 DN 526 Artington P&R Guildford 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 527 Burpham P&R Guildford 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 528 Gravetts Lane P&R Guildford 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 529 A3 West P&R Guildford 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 530 Manor Park P&R Guildford 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 531 Merrow P&R Guildford 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 533 Spectrum P&R Guildford 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0%

Issue No.Final Page 107 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Appendix C – Flow Charts detailing Forecasting Methodologies

Issue No.Final Page 108 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Forecast Methodology 2011 Matrix

Issue No.Final Page 109 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Forecast Methodology 2026 Do- Nothing Matrix

Issue No.Final Page 110 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Forecast Methodology 2026 Do- Something Matrix

Issue No.Final Page 111 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Appendix D – DMRB Volume 6 Section 2 Junction Layout Geometry Guidance

Issue No.Final Page 112 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Issue No.Final Page 113 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Issue No.Final Page 114 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Issue No.Final Page 115 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Issue No.Final Page 116 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Appendix E – Assessment of M25 Junctions based on DMRB Guidance

Issue No.Final Page 117 Document No. 3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

Existing Layout – Based on Aerial Photos

A3 A317

ANTI-CLOCKWISE

D,2 F,2 D,2 F,1

J11 J10

D,2 F,2 F,1 D,2

CLOCKWISE

A317 A3

Issue No.Final Page 118 Document No.3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

2010 Proposed Layout – Based on Observed Flows

A3 A317

ANTI-CLOCKWISE 1800 1800 2200 1400

7000 6100 5300 D,2 3900 F,2 D,2 5200 E,1

J11 J10

C,1 F,2 D,2 6750 F,2 5250 5050 6150 3750

1700 1500 CLOCKWISE 1100 2400

A317 A3

Issue No.Final Page 119 Document No.3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

2011 Proposed Layout – Based on Modelled Flows

A3 A317

ANTI-CLOCKWISE 1302 1509 991 1276

5798 6005 6289 4495 F,2 C,1 C,1 5013 E,1

J11 J10

E,1 D,2 F,2 D,2 6892 5542 7229 4932 7314

1350 2382 CLOCKWISE 1687 2297

A317 A3

Issue No.Final Page 120 Document No.3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

2026 Do-Nothing Proposed Layout – Based on Modelled Flows

A3 A317

ANTI-CLOCKWISE 1336 1569 990 1325

5871 6439 6104 D,2 4535 F,2 C,1 5114 E,1

J11 J10

D,2 F,2 F,2 D,2 7339 6940 5515 7268 4933

1426 2406 CLOCKWISE 1753 2334

A317 A3

Issue No.Final Page 121 Document No.3380\SICP\01

Cumulative Assessment of Future Development Impacts on the Highway Network Appendices

2026 Do-Something Proposed Layout – Based on Modelled Flows

A3 A317

ANTI-CLOCKWISE 1484 1567 1059 1329

6049 6403 6132 D,2 4566 F,2 C,1 5073 E,1

J11 J10

F,2 D,2 D,2 F,2 5072 7412 7097 5560 7337

1537 CLOCKWISE 1777 2265 2340

A317 A3