The Archaeology of the Cahokia Mounds ICT-II: Site Structure

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Archaeology of the Cahokia Mounds ICT-II: Site Structure The Archaeology of the Cahokia Mounds ICT-II: Site Structure James M. Collins fU Mound 72 Illinois Cultural Resources Study No. 10 Illinois Historic Preservation Agency JLUNOIS HISTORICAL SURVEY The Archaeology of the Cahokia Mounds ICT-II: Site Structure James M. Collins 1990 Illinois Cultural Resources Study No. 10 Illinois Historic Preservation Agency Springfield THE CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY SERIES The Cultural Resources Study Series was designed by the Illinois State Historic Preservation Office and Illinois Historic Preservation Agency to provide for the rapid dissemination of information to the professional community on archaeological investigations and resource management. To facilitate this process the studies are reproduced as received. Cultural Resources Study No. 10 reports on the features and structural remains excavated at the Cahokia Mounds Interpretive Center Tract-II. The author provides detailed descriptions and interpretations of household and community patterns and their relationship to the evolution of Cahokia 's political organization. This repwrt is a revised version of a draft previously submitted to the Illinois Historic Preservation Agency. The project was funded by the Illinois Department of Conservation and, subsequently, by the Illinois Historic Preservation Agency. William 1. Woods served as Principal Investigator. The work reported here was financed in part with federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of the Interior and administered by the Illinois Historic Preservation Agency. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of the Interior or the Illinois Historic Preservation Agency. Funds for preparation of this report were provided by a grant from The University of Iowa, Office of the Vice President for Research. Thomas E. Emerson, Chief Archaeologist of the Illinois Historic Preservation Agency serves as general editor for the Cultural Resources Study Series. International Standard Book Number 0-942579-10-0. This work is dedicated to Susan and Kathleen TABLE OF CONTENTS LISTOFnGURES vi LISTOFTABLES viii PREFACE '''i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS x"i CHAPTER I PROJECT HISTORY, DESIGN, AND METHODS Introduction 1 The Interpretive Center Tract-Location II 3 Recommendations Based on 1984 Testing 3 ICT-n Mitigation—1985 5 Research Topics 5 Methods 6 ICT-II Mitigation and Testing—1986 16 CHAPTER n SITE STRUCTURE EM THE AMERICAN BOTTOM: ca. A.D. 900-1250 Emergent Mississippian Settlement Patterns in the American Bottom 27 Mississippian Settlement Patterns in the American Bottom 29 Mississippian Developments at Cahokia 30 CHAPTER ni ICT-n CULTURAL FEATURES—ANALYTICAL APPROACH Introduction 35 Methods 36 CHAPTER IV FEATURE CLASSmCATION 46 Feature Class 1 —Pit Features of Indeterminate Function Feature Class 2—Cache/Storage Facilities 48 Feature Class 3—Fire-Related Features 58 Feature Qass4—Postmolds and Post Pits 65 Feature Class 5—Enclosed Wall Trench Structures 67 Feature Class 6—Other Structures 81 Feature Class 7—Other Features 87 CHAPTER V DESCRIPTIONS OF COMPONENT FEATURE ASSEMBLAGES Concepts of Household 103 Component Descriptions 104 Late Archaic Component Features 104 Indeterminate Mississippian Component Features 105 Lohmann Component Features 105 Lohmann-Stirling "Component" Features 1 19 Stirling Component Features 121 Early Stirling Component Features 123 Late Stirling Component Features I'^l General Stirling Component Features 160 Moorehead Component Features 166 CHAPtER VI SUMMARY COMPARISON OF FEATURES, FEATURE CLUSTERS, AND COMPONENTS Feature Classes: A Diachronic Perspective 220 Feature Clusters and Components: A Diachronic View 228 REFERENCES ^^ LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 Location of museum related investigations conducted prior to 1984 2 Figure 1.2 Cahokia site showing location of Interpretive Center Tract-Location IT 4 surface collection Figure 1 .3 Surface density distribution of chert artifacts recovered during 1985 8 Figiu-e 1.4 ICT-Il block showing limits of 1985 excavation 9 disturbances Figure 1 .5 Northern portion of ICT-II excavation block showing historic to Mississippian features 10 Figure 1.6 ICT-II excavation block showing location of Stratigraphy Trenches and Archaic Block. 13 Figure 1.7 Profile of north-south Stratigraphy Trench 14 Figure 1.8 Profile of east-west Stratigraphy Trench 15 Figure 1.9 Final configuration of ICT-II excavation block showing feature distribution 17 Figure 1.10 Composite of ICT-II mitigation and testing procedures 19 Figure 1.11 Surfacedensity distribution of artifacts from parking area collection 20 Figure 1.12 Utility corridor showing locations of Sample Areas 1-7 and Deep Backhoe Trenches 1 and 2 22 Figure 1.13 Sample Areas 1-7 showing sub-plowzone feature distribution 23 Figure 1.14 Profile of Deep Backhoe Trench 1 24 Figure 1.15 Profile of Deep Backhoe Trench 2 26 Figure 2.1 Composite of proposed cultural chronologies for Cahokia and the American Bottom.... 28 Figure 2.2 American Bottom showing physiography ca 1800 and locations of major Mississippian sites 31 Figure 3.1 Standard formulas used in detennining ICT-II feature volumes 37 Figure 3.2 ICT-II excavation block showing composite of excavated features 39 Figure 4.1 Representative examples of Sub-class 1.1 pit features 47 Figure 4.2 Representative examples of Sub-class 1.2 pit features 49 Figure 4.3 Representative example of Sub-class 1.3 pit features 50 Figure 4.4 Representative examples of Sub-class 2.1 exterior cache/storage pits 51 Figure 4.5 Representative examples of Sub-class 2.2 interior cache/storage pits 54 Figure 4.6 Representative examples of Sub-class 2.3 small cache pits 56 Figure 4.7 Sub-class 2.4 burial pit. Feature 423 57 Figure 4.8 Representative examples of Sub-class 3.1 hearths 59 Figure 4.9 Representative examples of Sub-class 3.2 fu^pils 60 Figure 4.10 Representative examples of Sub-class 3.3 fu-epits with posts 62 Figure 4.11 Representative example of Sub-class 3.4 smudge pits 63 Figure 4.12 Representative examples of Sub-class 3.5 pit ovens (Type 1) and roasting/steaming faciUties (Type 2) 64 Figure 4.13 Representative examples of Sub-class 4.1 free-standing post features 66 Figure 4.14a Sub-class 5.1 rectangular wall trench structure (Fea. 233) 69 Figure 4.14b Sub-class 5.1 rectangular wall trench structure (Fea. 324) 70 Figure 4.15a Sub-class 5.2 small, rectangular wall trench suiicture (Fea. 344) 72 Figure 4.15b Sub-class 5.2 small, rectangular wall trench stiiicture (Fea. 12) 73 Figure 4.16a Sub-class 5.3 square, or nearly square, wall U^nch structure (Fea. 143) 74 Figure 4.16b Sub-class 5.3 square, or nearly square, wall trench structure (Fea. 367) 75 Figure 4.17a Sub-class 5.4 unusual-shaped wall trench structure (Fea. 8) 77 Figure 4.17b Sub-class 5.4 unusual-shaped wall trench structure (Fea. 287) 78 Figure 4.17c Sub-class 5.4 unusual-shaped wall trench structures (Fea. 131) 79 Figure 4. 17d Sub-class 5.4 unusual-shaped wall trench stioictures (Fea. 332) 80 Figure 4.18 Representative examples of Sub-class 6.1 features 82 Figiu-e 4.19 Representative examples of Sub-class 6.2 features 84 Figure 4.20 Representative examples of Sub-class 6.3 features 86 Figure 4.21 Representative examples of Sub-class 6.5 post structures 88 Figure 4.22 Representative examples of Sub-class 7.4 features 90 Figure 5.1 Distribution of Indeterminate Mississippian features 106 Figure 5.2 Distribution of Lohmann component features 107 Figure 5.3 Locations of Lohmann component Feature Clusters 1-3 108 Figure 5.4 Lohmann Feature Cluster 1 110 Figure 5.5 Lohmann Feature Cluster 2 113 1 Figure 5.6 Lohmann Feature Cluster 3 116 Figure 5.7 Distribution of Lohmann-Stirling "component" features 120 Figure 5.8 Distribution of Stirling component features 122 Figiu^ 5.9 Distribution of Early Stirling component features 124 Figure 5.10 Location of Early Stirling component Feature Clusters 1-7 125 126 Figure 5.11 Early Stirling Feature Cluster 1 Figure 5.12 Early Stirling Feature Cluster 2 128 Figure 5.13 Early Stirling Feature Cluster 3 130 Figure 5.14 Early Stirling Feature Cluster4 133 Figure 5.15 Early Stirling Feauire Cluster 5 135 Figure 5.16 Early Stirling Feature Cluster 6 137 Figure 5.17 Early Stirling Feature Cluster 7 138 Figure 5.18 Distribution of Late Stirling component features 142 Figure 5.19 Location of Late Stirling component Feature Clusters 1-6 143 Figure 5.20 Late Stirling Feature Cluster 1 144 Figure 5.21 Late Stirling Feature Cluster 2 147 Figure 5.22 Late Stirling Feature Cluster 3 149 Figure 5.23 Proximity of Mound 107 to ICT-II excavation block 151 Figure 5.24 Detailed plan and profile of Late Stirling Structural Feature 178 152 Figure 5.25 Late Stirling Feature Cluster 4 154 Figure 5.26 Late Stirling Feature Cluster 5 157 Figure 5.27 Late Stirling Feature Cluster 6 159 Figure 5.28 Distribution of General Stirling component features 161 Figure 5.29 Detail of proposed hide processing activity area 164 Figure 5.30 Distribution of Moorehead component features 167 Figure 5.31 Location of Moorehead component Feature Clusters 1 and 2 168 Figure 5.32 Moorehead Feature Cluster 1 169 Figure 5.33 Moorehead Feature Cluster 2 174 Figure 6. Comparison of structure floor area means from the ICT-II and selected FAI-270 project sites 227 Figure 6.2 ICT-II Lohmann Component 231 Figure 6.3 ICT-II Stirling Component 232 Figure 6.4 ICT-II Moorehead Component 233 LIST OF TABLES 41 Table 3.1 ICT-II Cultural Feature Inventor>' Table4.1 Sub-class 1.1 Pit Features 92 Table4.2 Sub-class 1.2 Pit Features 93 Table4.3 Sub-class 1.3 Pit
Recommended publications
  • A Many-Storied Place
    A Many-storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator Midwest Region National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska 2017 A Many-Storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator 2017 Recommended: {){ Superintendent, Arkansas Post AihV'j Concurred: Associate Regional Director, Cultural Resources, Midwest Region Date Approved: Date Remove not the ancient landmark which thy fathers have set. Proverbs 22:28 Words spoken by Regional Director Elbert Cox Arkansas Post National Memorial dedication June 23, 1964 Table of Contents List of Figures vii Introduction 1 1 – Geography and the River 4 2 – The Site in Antiquity and Quapaw Ethnogenesis 38 3 – A French and Spanish Outpost in Colonial America 72 4 – Osotouy and the Changing Native World 115 5 – Arkansas Post from the Louisiana Purchase to the Trail of Tears 141 6 – The River Port from Arkansas Statehood to the Civil War 179 7 – The Village and Environs from Reconstruction to Recent Times 209 Conclusion 237 Appendices 241 1 – Cultural Resource Base Map: Eight exhibits from the Memorial Unit CLR (a) Pre-1673 / Pre-Contact Period Contributing Features (b) 1673-1803 / Colonial and Revolutionary Period Contributing Features (c) 1804-1855 / Settlement and Early Statehood Period Contributing Features (d) 1856-1865 / Civil War Period Contributing Features (e) 1866-1928 / Late 19th and Early 20th Century Period Contributing Features (f) 1929-1963 / Early 20th Century Period
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Athens, Georgia
    SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 ATHENS, GEORGIA BULLETIN 59 2016 BULLETIN 59 2016 PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 THE CLASSIC CENTER ATHENS, GEORGIA Meeting Organizer: Edited by: Hosted by: Cover: © Southeastern Archaeological Conference 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE CLASSIC CENTER FLOOR PLAN……………………………………………………...……………………..…... PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………………………….…..……. LIST OF DONORS……………………………………………………………………………………………….…..……. SPECIAL THANKS………………………………………………………………………………………….….....……….. SEAC AT A GLANCE……………………………………………………………………………………….……….....…. GENERAL INFORMATION & SPECIAL EVENTS SCHEDULE…………………….……………………..…………... PROGRAM WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 26…………………………………………………………………………..……. THURSDAY, OCTOBER 27……………………………………………………………………………...…...13 FRIDAY, OCTOBER 28TH……………………………………………………………….……………....…..21 SATURDAY, OCTOBER 29TH…………………………………………………………….…………....…...28 STUDENT PAPER COMPETITION ENTRIES…………………………………………………………………..………. ABSTRACTS OF SYMPOSIA AND PANELS……………………………………………………………..…………….. ABSTRACTS OF WORKSHOPS…………………………………………………………………………...…………….. ABSTRACTS OF SEAC STUDENT AFFAIRS LUNCHEON……………………………………………..…..……….. SEAC LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS FOR 2016…………………….……………….…….…………………. Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 59, 2016 ConferenceRooms CLASSIC CENTERFLOOR PLAN 6 73rd Annual Meeting, Athens, Georgia EVENT LOCATIONS Baldwin Hall Baldwin Hall 7 Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin
    [Show full text]
  • Program of the 75Th Anniversary Meeting
    PROGRAM OF THE 75 TH ANNIVERSARY MEETING April 14−April 18, 2010 St. Louis, Missouri THE ANNUAL MEETING of the Society for American Archaeology provides a forum for the dissemination of knowledge and discussion. The views expressed at the sessions are solely those of the speakers and the Society does not endorse, approve, or censor them. Descriptions of events and titles are those of the organizers, not the Society. Program of the 75th Anniversary Meeting Published by the Society for American Archaeology 900 Second Street NE, Suite 12 Washington DC 20002-3560 USA Tel: +1 202/789-8200 Fax: +1 202/789-0284 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://www.saa.org Copyright © 2010 Society for American Archaeology. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted in any form or by any means without prior permission from the publisher. Program of the 75th Anniversary Meeting 3 Contents 4............... Awards Presentation & Annual Business Meeting Agenda 5……….….2010 Award Recipients 10.................Maps of the America’s Center 12 ................Maps of Renaissance Grand St. Louis 14 ................Meeting Organizers, SAA Board of Directors, & SAA Staff 15 .............. General Information 18. ............. Featured Sessions 20 .............. Summary Schedule 25 .............. A Word about the Sessions 27............... Program 161................SAA Awards, Scholarships, & Fellowships 167............... Presidents of SAA . 168............... Annual Meeting Sites 169............... Exhibit Map 170................Exhibitor Directory 180................SAA Committees and Task Forces 184………….Index of participants 4 Program of the 75th Anniversary Meeting Awards Presentation & Annual Business Meeting America’s Center APRIL 16, 2010 5 PM Call to Order Call for Approval of Minutes of the 2009 Annual Business Meeting Remarks President Margaret W.
    [Show full text]
  • The Common Field Mississippian Site(23SG100), As Uncovered by the 1979 Mississippi River Flood Richard E
    The Common Field Mississippian Site(23SG100), as Uncovered by the 1979 Mississippi River Flood Richard E. Martens Two of the pictures I took during an early visit to the he Common Field site occurs near the bluffs in the site are shown in Figure 1. The first shows Mound A, the TMississippi River floodplain 3 km south of St. Gen- largest of the six then-existing mounds. The nose of my evieve and approximately 90 km south of St. Louis. It is brand-new 1980 Volkswagen parked on the farm road is a large Mississippian-period site that once had as many as in the lower right corner of the picture. The second photo eight mounds (Bushnell 1914:666). It was long considered shows the outline of a burned house structure typical of to be an unoccupied civic-ceremonial center because very many evident across the site. Although it has been noted few surface artifacts were found. This all changed due that many people visited the site shortly after the flood, I to a flood in December 1979, when the Mississippi River did not meet anyone during several visits in 1980 and 1981. swept across the Common Field site. The resulting erosion I subsequently learned that Dr. Michael O’Brien led removed up to 40 cm of topsoil, exposing: a group of University of Missouri (MU) personnel in a [a] tremendous quantity of archaeological material limited survey and fieldwork activity in the spring of 1980. including ceramic plates, pots and other vessels, articu- The first phase entailed aerial photography (black-and- lated human burials, well defined structural remains white and false-color infrared) of the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Mississippian Architecture: Temporal, Technological, and Spatial Patterning of Structures at the Toqua Site (40M R6) Richard R
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-1985 Mississippian Architecture: Temporal, Technological, and Spatial Patterning of Structures at the Toqua Site (40M R6) Richard R. Polhemus University of Tennessee - Knoxville Recommended Citation Polhemus, Richard R., "Mississippian Architecture: Temporal, Technological, and Spatial Patterning of Structures at the Toqua Site (40M R6). " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1985. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/3320 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Richard R. Polhemus entitled "Mississippian Architecture: Temporal, Technological, and Spatial Patterning of Structures at the Toqua Site (40M R6)." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Charles H. Faulkner, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Gerald F. Schroedl, Jefferson Chapman Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official student records.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Richard R. Polhemus entitled 11Mississippian Architecture: Temporal , Technolog ical, and Spatial Patterning of Structures at the Toqua Site ( 40MR6) •11 I have examined the final copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts , with a major in Anthropology.
    [Show full text]
  • A Spatial and Elemental Analyses of the Ceramic Assemblage at Mialoquo (40Mr3), an Overhill Cherokee Town in Monroe County, Tennessee
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-2019 COALESCED CHEROKEE COMMUNITIES IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY: A SPATIAL AND ELEMENTAL ANALYSES OF THE CERAMIC ASSEMBLAGE AT MIALOQUO (40MR3), AN OVERHILL CHEROKEE TOWN IN MONROE COUNTY, TENNESSEE Christian Allen University of Tennessee, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Recommended Citation Allen, Christian, "COALESCED CHEROKEE COMMUNITIES IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY: A SPATIAL AND ELEMENTAL ANALYSES OF THE CERAMIC ASSEMBLAGE AT MIALOQUO (40MR3), AN OVERHILL CHEROKEE TOWN IN MONROE COUNTY, TENNESSEE. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2019. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/5572 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Christian Allen entitled "COALESCED CHEROKEE COMMUNITIES IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY: A SPATIAL AND ELEMENTAL ANALYSES OF THE CERAMIC ASSEMBLAGE AT MIALOQUO (40MR3), AN OVERHILL CHEROKEE TOWN IN MONROE COUNTY, TENNESSEE." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Kandace Hollenbach, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Gerald Schroedl, Julie Reed Accepted for the Council: Dixie L.
    [Show full text]
  • Monks Mound—Center of the Universe? by John Mcclarey
    GUEST ESSAY Monks Mound—Center of the universe? By John McClarey hyperbole or a facsimile? I think the case can be made that Monks Mound and the entire Alayout of this ancient metropolis in the H American Bottom near East St. Louis was a facsimile or model of Cahokia’s place in the cosmos, similar to the Black Hills as a “mirror or heaven” or the heart of all that is.” These are good metaphors to describe Cahokia’s center in the three-layer cake concept of the universe—the Underworld, the Earth, and the Sky. Cahokia by the 12th century B.C.E., was the place for people to connect with the spirits of this sacred sphere. In this article I will identify the sacred elements that made this place special to local and non-local populations and the role of the Birdman chiefs, priests, and shamans to interpret this unique place as a center in a larger world. Additionally, I identify the similarities of Cahokia as a a sacred place to other societies at different times and places. My fascination with Cahokia Mounds developed over a period of time with many visits from the early 1970s to the present. Briefly, Cahokia was the largest America city north of Mexico before the coming of the Europeans in the 15th cen- tury. It is believed that Cahokia was a political, religious, and economic center for perhaps as many as 500,000 Indians in the Mississippi Valley. It was a planned city with everything the world and in all religions, but the focus here is on the laid out on the cardinal points on the compass, Monks Cahokia Mounds in southern Illinois and cross culture Mound, the largest mound at the center, served as the official comparisons, Cahokia’s unique story includes the cruciform residence of the Great Sun god or Birdman deity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of the Past: Science in Archaeology Illinois Antiquity Vol
    The Future of the Past: Science in Archaeology Illinois Antiquity Vol. 50, No. 3 September 2015 REFERENCES AND SUGGESTED READINGS ARCHAEOLOGY AND ECOLOGY: BRIDGING THE SCIENCES THROUGH INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH By Carol E. Colaninno LiDAR ILLUMINATED By Michael Farkas IDENTIFYING BLACK DRINK CEREMONIALISM AT CAHOKIA: CHEMICAL RESIDUE ANALYSIS By Thomas E. Emerson and Timothy R. Pauketat SOURCING NATIVE AMERICAN CERAMICS FROM WESTERN ILLINOIS By Julie Zimmermann Holt, Andrew J. Upton, and Steven A. Hanlin Conrad, Lawrence A. 1989 The Southeastern Ceremonial Complex on the Northern Middle Mississippian Frontier: Late Prehistoric Politico-religious Systems in the Central Illinois River Valley. In The Southeastern Ceremonial Complex: Artifacts and Analysis, edited by P. Galloway, pp. 93-113. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln. 1991 The Middle Mississippian Cultures of the Central Illinois Valley. In Cahokia and the Hinterlands: Middle Mississippian Cultures of the Midwest, edited by T. E. Emerson and R. B. Lewis, pp. 119-156. University of Illinois Press, Urbana. Dye, David H. 2004 Art, Ritual, and Chiefly Warfare in the Mississippian World. In Hero, Hawk, and Open Hand: American Indian Art of the Ancient Midwest and South, edited by R. F. Townsend, pp. 191-205. The Art Institute, Chicago. Fie, Shannon M. 2006 Visiting in the Interaction Sphere: Ceramic Exchange and Interaction in the Lower Illinois Valley. In Recreating Hopewell, edited by D. K. Charles and J. E. Buikstra, pp. 427-45. University Press of Florida, Gainesville. 2008 Middle Woodland Ceramic Exchange in the Lower Illinois Valley. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 33:5-40. Fowles, Severin M., Leah Minc, Samuel Duwe and David V.
    [Show full text]
  • Archeology of the Funeral Mound, Ocmulgee National Monument, Georgia
    1.2.^5^-3 rK 'rm ' ^ -*m *~ ^-mt\^ -» V-* ^JT T ^T A . ESEARCH SERIES NUMBER THREE Clemson Universii akCHEOLOGY of the FUNERAL MOUND OCMULGEE NATIONAL MONUMENT, GEORGIA TIONAL PARK SERVICE • U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 3ERAL JCATK5N r -v-^tfS i> &, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fred A. Seaton, Secretary National Park Service Conrad L. Wirth, Director Ihis publication is one of a series of research studies devoted to specialized topics which have been explored in con- nection with the various areas in the National Park System. It is printed at the Government Printing Office and may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington 25, D. C. Price $1 (paper cover) ARCHEOLOGY OF THE FUNERAL MOUND OCMULGEE National Monument, Georgia By Charles H. Fairbanks with introduction by Frank M. Settler ARCHEOLOGICAL RESEARCH SERIES NUMBER THREE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR • WASHINGTON 1956 THE NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM, of which Ocmulgee National Monument is a unit, is dedi- cated to conserving the scenic, scientific, and his- toric heritage of the United States for the benefit and enjoyment of its people. Foreword Ocmulgee National Monument stands as a memorial to a way of life practiced in the Southeast over a span of 10,000 years, beginning with the Paleo-Indian hunters and ending with the modern Creeks of the 19th century. Here modern exhibits in the monument museum will enable you to view the panorama of aboriginal development, and here you can enter the restoration of an actual earth lodge and stand where forgotten ceremonies of a great tribe were held.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Chronic Violence in the Mississippian Period Central Illinois
    CHAPTER 43 ....................................... .......................................................... LIVING WITH WAR: THE IMPACT OF CHRONIC VIOLENCE IN THE MISSISSIPPIAN-PERI 0 D CENTRAL ILLINOIS RIVER VALLEY GREGORY D. WILSON THE Central Illinois River Valley (CIRV) of west-central Illinois has a complex Jistory of migration and culture contact that was strongly affected by violence (Conrad 1991; Esarey and Conrad 1998; Milner et al. 1991; Steadman 2001). Located on the northern periphery of the Mississippian cultural area, the CIRV has the totential to transform our understanding of the impact and outcomes of inter­ group violence in middle-range societies (Figures 43.1 and 43.2). In this chapter, I argue that changing patterns of violence substantially altered the lives of those who lived in this region. To make my case I discuss archaeological patterns of violence from four different periods of the late Prehistoric era: the terminal late Woodland period (AD 700 to noo), the early Mississippian period (AD noo to 1250), the middle Mississippian Period (AD 1250 to 1300 ), and the late Mississippian period (AD 1300 to 1440). MIDSOUTH AND SOUTHEAST I' Figure 43.1 Locations of regions discussed in text: CIRV, Central Illinois River Valley; LIRV, Lower Illinois River Valley; AB, American Bottom. LATE WOODLAND PERIOD The Late Woodland period was an era of intensifying hostilities across much of eastern North America (Cobb and Garrow 1996; Little 1999; Milner 2007). Inter­ group conflict ensued from adoption of a more sedentary way of life based on plant cultivation, associated population increases, and use of new military and huntiJ11 technologies such as the bow and arrow (Blitz 1988; Milner 1999:122, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • The Lamb Site (11SC24): Evidence of Cahokian Contact and Mississippianization in the Central Illinois River Valley
    The Lamb Site (11SC24): Evidence of Cahokian Contact and Mississippianization in the Central Illinois River Valley Dana N. Bardolph and Gregory D. Wilson The analysis of materials recovered from salvage excavations at the Lamb site (11SC24) in the central Illinois River valley (CIRV) has generated new insight into the Mississip- pianization of west-central Illinois. The evidence reveals a context of converging but still very much entangled Woodland and Mississippian traditions. The Lamb site residents appear to have been selectively adopting or emulating aspects of Mississippian lifeways, while maintaining certain Bauer Branch traditions during the period of contact with Cahokia Mississippians. The eleventh and twelfth centuries A.D. comprised an era during which many Native American groups throughout the Midwest and Southeast altered their cosmological beliefs and socioeconomic relationships to participate in a Mississippian way of life. The causes of Mississippianization were variable and complex but often involved inten- sified negotiations among social groups with different geographical origins. Cahokia, the earliest and most complex Mississippian polity, played an important role in these far-flung negotiations. Indeed, the Mississippianization of the Midwest is one of the best-documented examples of culture contact in pre-Columbian North America. Beginning around A.D. 1050, stylistically Cahokian material culture appeared in a number of discontiguous portions of the Midwest. Mississippianization resulting from contact between Cahokians and different Woodland groups has been examined within several different methodological and theoretical frameworks. A range of direct and in- direct contact scenarios have emerged from this theorizing, from detached emulations of Cahokia by local people, to limited engagements with or small-scale movements of Cahokians, to whole-group site-unit intrusions of Cahokians into the northern Midwest (e.g., Conrad 1991; Delaney-Rivera 2000, 2007; Emerson and Lewis 1991; Emerson et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Frijoles Canyon, the Preservation of a Resource
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 2002 Frijoles Canyon, the Preservation of a Resource Lauren Meyer University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Meyer, Lauren, "Frijoles Canyon, the Preservation of a Resource" (2002). Theses (Historic Preservation). 508. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/508 Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Meyer, Lauren (2002). Frijoles Canyon, the Preservation of a Resource. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/508 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Frijoles Canyon, the Preservation of a Resource Disciplines Historic Preservation and Conservation Comments Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Meyer, Lauren (2002). Frijoles Canyon, the Preservation of a Resource. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This thesis or dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/508 uNivERsmy PENNSYLV^NL^ UBKARIE5 Frijoles Canyon, The Preservation of A Resource Lauren Meyer A THESIS In Historic Preservation
    [Show full text]