Economic Assessment of Use Values of Near-Natural Forestry Compared with Rotational Forestry in Denmark
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Eur J Forest Res (2014) 133:611–622 DOI 10.1007/s10342-014-0789-3 ORIGINAL PAPER Economic assessment of use values of near-natural forestry compared with rotational forestry in Denmark Dareskedar Workie Amsalu • Jette Bredahl Jacobsen • Thomas Hedemark Lundhede Received: 21 June 2013 / Revised: 12 January 2014 / Accepted: 24 January 2014 / Published online: 2 February 2014 Ó Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014 Abstract The present study is a cost-benefit analysis of Introduction converting the current rotational forestry (RF) of Norway spruce stand into near-natural forestry (NNF) of beech, Conversion of the traditional rotational forestry (RF) of Nor- based on two representative soil conditions and visitors way spruce (Picea abies) into a more ecologically oriented popular case areas in Denmark, considering welfare eco- and society-centred multi-functionality forestry approach nomic values of timber, recreation provision, and ground- called near-natural forestry (NNF), using native broadleaved water recharge. The study answers the major research species and mainly European beech (Fagus sylvatica), has question of how large the welfare economic values of been growing across many European countries. There are two recreation and groundwater benefits of the conversion are underlying common factors for the conversion (Spiecker et al. as compared with timber benefits. The net present values 2004). First, with rising living standards over time, modern (NPV) of the benefits were calculated for an infinite time society’s interest in multiple functions of forest, such as out- horizon at a 3 % discount rate. The results reveal that door recreation provision, water protection, biodiversity converting into NNF would result in a NPV of at least conservation, and carbon storage, increases, and NNF is often 6,832 € ha-1 from use values of recreation and water better at securing these ecosystem services than RF. Second, benefit on a site with good soil and a high visitor fre- the traditional monoculture management of Norway spruce quency, as is typical in the eastern part of Denmark. On a has faced severe damages by storm, insect pests, and other site in the west of the country, with poor growth conditions disturbance. and a lower visitor frequency, the gain is still substantial, Despite lively discussion of the development of society- namely 5,581 € ha-1. These benefits though come at a cost centred and nature-based forestry policy, the welfare eco- of 3,375 and 6,206 € ha-1 from timber production, nomic impacts assessment of the expected social and respectively. This means that the economic value of use environmental benefits of the policy is yet at the young values of recreation and water benefits outweighs the loss phase. The current study, therefore, aims at providing an of timber on good soil conditions but not on poor soil economic assessment of the socio-economic effects of conditions. converting RF of Norway spruce stand into NNF of beech, based on two representative cases at each end of the Keywords Cost-benefit analysis Á Near-natural forestry Á spectrum of soil conditions and visitor frequencies in Recreation score Á Tree growth Á Run-off Á Water Á Denmark. We consider welfare economic values of the Conversion most demanded forest functions, namely timber production and two non-timber benefits (recreation provision, and groundwater recharge and protection). Conversion from one forest management into another, including a tree spe- Communicated by M. Moog. cies change, is a long-term change, and many benefits may first be seen much later. Therefore, an important attribute D. W. Amsalu (&) Á J. B. Jacobsen Á T. H. Lundhede University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark of the study is that we make the flow of the non-timber e-mail: [email protected] benefits age dependent. 123 612 Eur J Forest Res (2014) 133:611–622 Apart from use values, forests also provide non-use Table 1 The number of visitors and soil conditions in two study values. However, the aim with the current study is alone to forest areas in Denmark estimate the use values which are more tangible. Site Gribskov Klosterheden Source The study would give an important insight for policy characteristics makers and forest managers to scheme site-specific eco- Number of 78 (448,000 visits 25 (154,250 visits Jensen nomic instruments, such as payment for ecosystem services visitors over 5,698 ha) over 6,265 ha) (2003) (PES), so as to attain sustainable forest management. (visits The existing forest economics literature that has ana- ha-1 year-1) lysed the business economics of NNF compared with RF Annual 613 850 DMI finds ambiguous results. Tarp et al. (2000) and Nord-Lar- precipitation 2012 (mm) sen et al. (2003) find NNF to be superior, mainly due to Location Northern Zealand Northwest Jutland reduced establishment costs. Nord-Larsen et al. also attri- Soil condition Good soil class Poor soil class Møller bute the result to more optimal harvest timing. Other For beech site class For beech site (1933) studies find the profitability of conversion into NNF to be 1(H50)of24m class 4 (H50)of inferior to RF in some stable conditions (Jacobsen et al. (top height at age 17 m (top height 2004; Duncker et al. 2011). Yet, the business economics of 50). at age 50) the conversion is only one side of the coin. The other is the For Norway spruce For Norway spruce non-marketed ecosystem services. site class 2 (H50) site class 3 (H50) Price and Price (2008) throw light on the economic cost- of 25 m of 22.5 m benefit analysis of continuous cover forestry or NNF of conifers trees with a monetary estimate of recreation benefit and water evapotranspiration loss against the RF system, with respect to soil conditions and visitor frequency assuming the benefits are constant over time. However, the (Table 1). The conversion is meant to achieve two major recreational values are known to depend on age and forest objectives: wood production and recreation values on both structure (Boman et al. 2010). Consequently, we examined sites (Larsen and Nielsen 2007). An important co-benefit is the dynamic welfare economic values of recreation benefit of an increased amount of groundwater produced as broad- different phases over a rotation of NNF beech. This was leaved trees evaporates less. The forest areas on both sites possible by tracing Danish recreationalists’ willingness to are composed of different tree species, mainly Norway pay (WTP) for attributes of NNF of beech (Nielsen et al. spruce, European beech, different species of oak (Quer- 2007) to different phases of the stand development, using the cus), and Douglas fir (Pseuudotsuga menziesii) (Rune respective ‘‘recreational scores’’ developed in the EFOR- 2009). WOOD research project (Edwards et al. 2010). To make sure that we compare initiatives originating Groundwater is an important resource in Denmark, from the same state, the starting point for the developed fulfilling almost the entire water demand. In densely pop- scenarios is assumed to be bare land after the existing ulated areas, the resource is becoming scarce, and matured Norway spruce stand is clear-felled. Due to risk of increased demand for water is therefore an issue. The windthrow in Denmark, it is normally not considered fea- provision of groundwater underneath forests depends on sible to regenerate under shelter, and natural regeneration age as does recreation (Boman et al. 2010). However, the is not possible due to lack of seed trees in the conversion biggest difference lies in the species change and thereby phase. The ‘‘baseline scenario’’ is a continuation of RF of the amount of water running through. Norway spruce using clear-felling and replanting in a The remainders of the paper are organised as follows. 60-year rotation period on the good soil and 70 years on Section two discusses definition of the traditional and the poor soil, for an infinite time horizon (Forest Eco- conversion scenarios, methodology and economic calcu- nomics Table 2006). At the time of re-establishment, lations of timber and non-timber benefits. Section three and Norway spruce is planted at a density of 4,500 trees per four present and discuss the results, respectively. hectare. We assume standard practice of a heavy thinning early in the stand’s life whereafter it develops into a light thinning once the stand attains a height makes it susceptible Materials and methods to windthrow (12–14 m) (Danish Forest Society 1995, cited by Nord-Larsen et al. 2003). Site description and the scenarios The ‘‘conversion scenario’’ is defined by principles of NNF (Larsen and Nielsen 2007) of beech, using a uniform The study focuses on converting the current RF of Norway shelterwood system with a regeneration thinning at stand spruce stand into NNF of beech based on two different sites age 90 years and liquidation of the last holdovers at age 123 Eur J Forest Res (2014) 133:611–622 613 110 for an infinite time horizon on the good soil. The TNPV ¼ NPVTimber þ NPVRecreation þ NPVWater corresponding shelterwood stand ages on the poor soil are extended to 100 and 130 (Forest Economics Table 2006). In the following subsections, the economic calculation At the time of establishment, beech is planted at a density of timber, recreation benefit, and groundwater benefits are of 5,500 trees per hectare and followed by continuous described. thinning, regeneration harvests, and initiation of natural regeneration. Economic calculation of timber benefit Methods The tree growth model outputs are based on a standard growth and yield table (Forest Economics Table 2006). The current study applied an economic cost-benefit ana- Economic data including regeneration costs and stumpage lysis (cf Hanley and Barbier 2009) by means of benefit price were found from Forest Economics Table (2006) and transfer to assess the monetary values of timber and non- adjusted for inflation to year 2012 (Statistics Denmark timber benefits.