Resilience in Pastoral Areas - North

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Resilience in Pastoral Areas - North Resilience in Pastoral Areas - North Final Report on Rapid Assessment of the Impact of COVID-19 on Peace and Social Cohesion among Pastoralists: The Case of Fafen and Siti Zones of Somali Region Ethiopia By RiPA DISCLAIMER This Rapid assessment report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this Rapid assessment report are the responsibility of Mercy Corps and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. August, 2020 Ethiopia Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1. Background ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.2. Objectives of the Assessment ....................................................................................... 3 1.3. Scope of the Assessment .............................................................................................. 4 2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE ................................................................................................ 5 3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................... 9 3.1. Research design and approach .................................................................................... 9 3.2. Methods of Data Collection ......................................................................................... 9 3.3. Methods of Sampling .................................................................................................. 10 3.4. Methods of Data Analysis .......................................................................................... 11 4. FINDINGS OF THE RAPID ASSESSMENT................................................................... 12 4.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 12 4.2. COVID-19 Situation and Socio-economic Impact................................................... 13 4.2.1. COVID-19 Situation ............................................................................................. 13 4.2.2. Knowledge and perception toward COVID-19 ............................................... 15 4.2.3. Socio-economic Impact of COVID-19 ................................................................... 20 4.3. Impact of COVID-19 on Social Cohesion ................................................................. 39 4.3.1. Characteristics of social relations ........................................................................... 39 4.3.2. Emerging social problems perceived by people due to COVID-19 pandemic 42 ii 4.3.3. COVID-19 & Role of CBOs in promoting social cohesion ................................. 43 4.4. Conflict Situations and COVID-19 ............................................................................ 45 5. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................ 48 5.1. Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 48 5.2. Recommendations ....................................................................................................... 52 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 56 APPENDICES: KII and FGD Guides used in the Rapid Assessment ................................ 58 iii iv 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Background The spread of a contagious virus said to have emerged from Hubei province of China and spread to different parts of the world caused unprecedented anomalies over all aspects of humans living in the world today. The number of people infected by COVID- 19 has reached 5,603,143 worldwide, 115,892 in Africa, and 655 cases in Ethiopia. So far, a total of 348,167 deaths has also been registered across the globe (Woldometers, May 26, 2020). The virus caused a greater threat to public health to people both in developed as well as developing world. The nature of the pandemic such as its communicability and fastest spread made governments and nations take measures that have implication on the social, economic, and political and health sectors. Different countries have designed their own containment and prevention strategies. This ranges from measures of restriction of international and regional flights and peoples' mobility, closure of borders and boundaries to declaring states of emergency and a complete as well as partial lockdown of major metropolitan cities and states. These are measures complementing the widely practiced advice of the health professionals and the WHO such as keeping personal cleanliness, social distancing and stay at home measures to be practiced by each and every individual citizen of any state. The government of Ethiopia, as one of the countries affected by the spread of the virus, has been taking different measures to deal with and lower the harm that is posed by the pandemic. One of the main measures is the declaration of state of emergency that made key restrictions on the way people relate and the communications are managed. The aim of the state of emergency is understandably to contain and prevent the spread of the pandemic and hence save the lives of the fellow citizens of the country. Following the directions put forth by the federal government, the respective regional governments have also been taking different measures that they deem help to minimize both the spread of COVID-19 and the risks associated with it. The effect of the COVID- 1 19 pandemic is therefore being felt both at global, national and regional levels. The implications are also felt in each locality of the developing and developed societies as the economic slowdowns, lockdown measures and restrictions of mobility of peoples and goods posed greater challenge on the livelihoods of the hundreds of millions of people. According to the World Economic Forum (2020), COVID-19 related lockdown caused millions of jobs and billions of dollars to be lost by the developed and developing countries. As a result, countries are using their own measures to cope up with the challenges posed by COVID-19. Some are struggling by allocating budgets, while others through safety nets and humanitarian efforts. Hence, what can so far be said is that the coping capacity depends on the level of development and vulnerability. The more countries are developed it is assumed that they will better cope with the economic and related effects of the pandemic. Viewed in this light, predictions indicate that developing countries both in Latin America and Africa including Ethiopia may be severely affected by the socio-economic and public health effects of the virus. More specifically, the pastoralist and agro pastoralist communities in the country at large and of Somali region in particular would be affected socio-economically because of the COVID-19 related restrictions and lockdowns that would pose a challenge to the movement of people and goods. The economic effect would be more pronounced as livelihoods in the area have already been vulnerable owing to the multifaceted man-made challenges such as conflict and natural challenges resulted from climate change impacts of repeated drought and floods that has exacerbated the livelihoods of the pastoralist community in the region. The pastoral areas of Ethiopia are known for their arid and semi-arid ecology characterized by intermittent, small and unpredictable amount of annual rain fall (Kemal, 2014). With climate change, droughts became a frequent phenomenon in the area with a negative impact on the livelihoods of the pastoralist communities. Within 2 this framework of the scarcity context, competition over scarce resources has become the main cause for conflict among the agro/pastoral communities who depend on the use of collective property to make a living (Wehrmann, 2017). The pastoral communities have long been marginalized groups in Ethiopia, neglected by successive Ethiopian governments who gave little or no attention to the human condition and physical and human infrastructure development of the area (Kemal, M., 2014). Given such a context, Mercy Corps as an international, non-governmental organization working on pastoral development sought to understand the impact of COVID-19 on peace and social cohesion with the aim of designing interventions aimed at supporting the pastoral communities to be able to cope up with the problems posed by COVID-19 on such aspects. This rapid assessment was, hence, conducted by Netizen Consultancy Firm for Mercy Corps with the main aim of examining the impact of COVID-19 related restrictions and lockdown measures on peace and social cohesion among pastoral and agro-pastoral communities in Fafen and Siti Zones of Somali region. 1.2. Objectives of the Assessment General Objective The main objective of the rapid assessment was to identify the key impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, including trigger factors that may trigger or exacerbate conflict and affect social cohesion among pastoral communities in Fafen and Siti Zones of Somali Region. Specific Objectives The specific objectives of the assessment were: ✓ To identify impact of COVID-19 related restrictions and lockdown on mobility and day to day life of the pastoral and agro-pastoral communities ✓ To examine
Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: 2015 HRF Projects Map (As of 31 December 2015)
    Ethiopia: 2015 HRF projects map (as of 31 December 2015) Countrywide intervention ERITREA Legend UNICEF - Nutrition - $999,753 Concern☃ - VSF-G ☈ ! Refugee camp WFP - Nutrition (CSB) - $1.5m National capital Shimelba Red Sea SUDAN Regional intervention International boundary Hitsa!ts Dalul UNICEF - Health - $1.0m ! !Hitsats ! ! Undetermined boundary ! ! SCI Tigray, Afar, Amhara, Oromia, Kelete Berahile ☃☉ May-Ayni Kola ! Somali, Gambella, SNPR & NRC - ☉ Ts!elemti Temben Awelallo Lake IRC - ★ ! ☄ ! ♫ Tanqua ! SUDAN ! ! ! Dire Dawa Adi Harush ! Enderta Abergele ! Ab Ala Afdera Project woredas Tselemt ! NRC - Debark GAA - ☇ ! WFP (UNHAS) - Coordination ☈ Abergele! Erebti ☋☉ Plan Int. - ACF - ☃ Dabat Sahla ☃Megale Bidu and Support Service - $740,703 Janamora Wegera! Clusters/Activities ! Ziquala Somali region Sekota ! ! Concern - SCI Teru ! Agriculture CRS - Agriculture/Seed - $2,5m ☃ ☃ Kurri ! Dehana ! ☋ ! Gaz Alamata ! Elidar GAA - ☋ Amhara,Ormia and SNNP regions ! ☃☉ Gonder Zuria Gibla ! Gulf of ! Education Plan Int. - Ebenat Kobo SCI☃☉ ☃ ! Gidan ☄ Lasta ! Aden CARE - Lay Guba ! Ewa ! ☃ ! Meket Lafto Gayint ! Food security & livelihood WV - ☃ Dubti ☈ ☉ ! Tach Habru Chifra SCI - ☃ Delanta ! ! - Tigray Region, Eastern Zone, Kelete Awelall, ! Gayint IMC - ☃ Health ☉ Simada Southern Zone, Alamata and Enderta woredas ! ! Mile DJIBOUTI ☊ Mekdela ! Bati Enbise SCI- Nutrition ! Argoba ☃☉ WV - ☃ Sar Midir Legambo ☃ ! Oxfam GB - Enarj ! ☉ ! ! Ayisha Non Food Items - Amhara region, North Gonder (Gonder Zuria), Enawga ! Antsokiya Dalfagi ! ! ! Concern
    [Show full text]
  • Bad Borders Make Bad Neighbours the Political Economy of Relief and Rehabilitation in the Somali Region 5, Eastern Ethiopia
    Relief and Rehabilitation Network Network Paper 4 Bad Borders Make Bad Neighbours The Political Economy of Relief and Rehabilitation in the Somali Region 5, Eastern Ethiopia Koenraad Van Brabant September 1994 Please send comments on this paper to: Relief and Rehabilitation Network Overseas Development Institute Regent's College Inner Circle Regent's Park London NW1 4NS United Kingdom A copy will be sent to the author. Comments received may be used in future Newsletters. ISSN: 1353-8691 © Overseas Development Institute, London, 1994. Photocopies of all or part of this publication may be made providing that the source is acknowledged. Requests for commercial reproduction of Network material should be directed to ODI as copyright holders. The Network Coordinator would appreciate receiving details of any use of this material in training, research or programme design, implementation or evaluation. Bad Borders Make Bad Neighbours The Political Economy of Relief and Rehabilitation in the Somali Region 5, Eastern Ethiopia Koenraad Van Brabant1 Contents Page Maps 1. Introduction 1 2. Pride and Prejudice in the Somali Region 5 : The Political History of a Conflict 3 * The Ethiopian empire-state and the colonial powers 4 * Greater Somalia, Britain and the growth of Somali nationalism 8 * Conflict and war between Ethiopia and Somalia 10 * Civil war in Somalia 11 * The Transitional Government in Ethiopia and Somali Region 5 13 3. Cycles of Relief and Rehabilitation in Eastern Ethiopia : 1973-93 20 * 1973-85 : `Relief shelters' or the politics of drought and repatriation 21 * 1985-93 : Repatriation as opportunity for rehabilitation and development 22 * The pastoral sector : Recovery or control? 24 * Irrigation schemes : Ownership, management and economic viability 30 * Food aid : Targeting, free food and economic uses of food aid 35 * Community participation and institutional strengthening 42 1 Koenraad Van Brabant has been project manager relief and rehabilitation for eastern Ethiopia with SCF(UK) and is currently Oxfam's country representative in Sri Lanka.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia Rapid Response Displacement/Idp Returns 2019
    RESIDENT/HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR REPORT ON THE USE OF CERF FUNDS RESIDENT/HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR REPORT ON THE USE OF CERF FUNDS 19-RR-ETH-37959 ETHIOPIA RAPID RESPONSE DISPLACEMENT/IDP RETURNS 2019 RESIDENT/HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR CATHERINE SOZI REPORTING PROCESS AND CONSULTATION SUMMARY a. Please indicate when the After-Action Review (AAR) was conducted and who participated. N/A AAR was not conducted for this allocation due to the global pandemic which re-organized priorities. Humanitarian partners attention was diverted to mitigation and response to the pandemic. However, response and requirements for the secondary displaced population is continually addressed at the various coordination meetings. b. Please confirm that the Resident Coordinator and/or Humanitarian Coordinator (RC/HC) Report on the Yes No use of CERF funds was discussed in the Humanitarian and/or UN Country Team. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and many other pressing priorities in Ethiopia that related with the security situation as well as the need to limit the number of agenda items for discussion given the modality of the meetings (virtual) the report was not discussed at the HCT. c. Was the final version of the RC/HC Report shared for review with in-country stakeholders (i.e. the CERF recipient agencies and their implementing partners, cluster/sector coordinators and members and Yes No relevant government counterparts)? The report was reviewed and shared with the applicant agencies. 2 PART I Strategic Statement by the Resident/Humanitarian Coordinator In the year 2018, Ethiopia experienced the highest number of conflict-related internal displacement in the world. Following the Government decision for the displaced population to return to places of origin in May 2019, some 1.2 million returnees remained secondarily displaced closer to their homes.
    [Show full text]
  • Oromia Region Administrative Map(As of 27 March 2013)
    ETHIOPIA: Oromia Region Administrative Map (as of 27 March 2013) Amhara Gundo Meskel ! Amuru Dera Kelo ! Agemsa BENISHANGUL ! Jangir Ibantu ! ! Filikilik Hidabu GUMUZ Kiremu ! ! Wara AMHARA Haro ! Obera Jarte Gosha Dire ! ! Abote ! Tsiyon Jars!o ! Ejere Limu Ayana ! Kiremu Alibo ! Jardega Hose Tulu Miki Haro ! ! Kokofe Ababo Mana Mendi ! Gebre ! Gida ! Guracha ! ! Degem AFAR ! Gelila SomHbo oro Abay ! ! Sibu Kiltu Kewo Kere ! Biriti Degem DIRE DAWA Ayana ! ! Fiche Benguwa Chomen Dobi Abuna Ali ! K! ara ! Kuyu Debre Tsige ! Toba Guduru Dedu ! Doro ! ! Achane G/Be!ret Minare Debre ! Mendida Shambu Daleti ! Libanos Weberi Abe Chulute! Jemo ! Abichuna Kombolcha West Limu Hor!o ! Meta Yaya Gota Dongoro Kombolcha Ginde Kachisi Lefo ! Muke Turi Melka Chinaksen ! Gne'a ! N!ejo Fincha!-a Kembolcha R!obi ! Adda Gulele Rafu Jarso ! ! ! Wuchale ! Nopa ! Beret Mekoda Muger ! ! Wellega Nejo ! Goro Kulubi ! ! Funyan Debeka Boji Shikute Berga Jida ! Kombolcha Kober Guto Guduru ! !Duber Water Kersa Haro Jarso ! ! Debra ! ! Bira Gudetu ! Bila Seyo Chobi Kembibit Gutu Che!lenko ! ! Welenkombi Gorfo ! ! Begi Jarso Dirmeji Gida Bila Jimma ! Ketket Mulo ! Kersa Maya Bila Gola ! ! ! Sheno ! Kobo Alem Kondole ! ! Bicho ! Deder Gursum Muklemi Hena Sibu ! Chancho Wenoda ! Mieso Doba Kurfa Maya Beg!i Deboko ! Rare Mida ! Goja Shino Inchini Sululta Aleltu Babile Jimma Mulo ! Meta Guliso Golo Sire Hunde! Deder Chele ! Tobi Lalo ! Mekenejo Bitile ! Kegn Aleltu ! Tulo ! Harawacha ! ! ! ! Rob G! obu Genete ! Ifata Jeldu Lafto Girawa ! Gawo Inango ! Sendafa Mieso Hirna
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative Region, Zone and Woreda Map of Oromia a M Tigray a Afar M H U Amhara a Uz N M
    35°0'0"E 40°0'0"E Administrative Region, Zone and Woreda Map of Oromia A m Tigray A Afar m h u Amhara a uz N m Dera u N u u G " / m r B u l t Dire Dawa " r a e 0 g G n Hareri 0 ' r u u Addis Ababa ' n i H a 0 Gambela m s Somali 0 ° b a K Oromia Ü a I ° o A Hidabu 0 u Wara o r a n SNNPR 0 h a b s o a 1 u r Abote r z 1 d Jarte a Jarso a b s a b i m J i i L i b K Jardega e r L S u G i g n o G A a e m e r b r a u / K e t m uyu D b e n i u l u o Abay B M G i Ginde e a r n L e o e D l o Chomen e M K Beret a a Abe r s Chinaksen B H e t h Yaya Abichuna Gne'a r a c Nejo Dongoro t u Kombolcha a o Gulele R W Gudetu Kondole b Jimma Genete ru J u Adda a a Boji Dirmeji a d o Jida Goro Gutu i Jarso t Gu J o Kembibit b a g B d e Berga l Kersa Bila Seyo e i l t S d D e a i l u u r b Gursum G i e M Haro Maya B b u B o Boji Chekorsa a l d Lalo Asabi g Jimma Rare Mida M Aleltu a D G e e i o u e u Kurfa Chele t r i r Mieso m s Kegn r Gobu Seyo Ifata A f o F a S Ayira Guliso e Tulo b u S e G j a e i S n Gawo Kebe h i a r a Bako F o d G a l e i r y E l i Ambo i Chiro Zuria r Wayu e e e i l d Gaji Tibe d lm a a s Diga e Toke n Jimma Horo Zuria s e Dale Wabera n a w Tuka B Haru h e N Gimbichu t Kutaye e Yubdo W B Chwaka C a Goba Koricha a Leka a Gidami Boneya Boshe D M A Dale Sadi l Gemechis J I e Sayo Nole Dulecha lu k Nole Kaba i Tikur Alem o l D Lalo Kile Wama Hagalo o b r Yama Logi Welel Akaki a a a Enchini i Dawo ' b Meko n Gena e U Anchar a Midega Tola h a G Dabo a t t M Babile o Jimma Nunu c W e H l d m i K S i s a Kersana o f Hana Arjo D n Becho A o t
    [Show full text]
  • Report Submission Status Progress Against the HRP Reporthub
    Meeting Name: Shelter/NFI Cluster Coordination Meeting (Federal) Date of Meeting May 8th, 2020 Time 10:00 AM Minutes prepared by: Selam Wudu Location Webinar chaired by Shelter Cluster Attendees Christian AID, COOPI, CRS, IOM, UNHCR, IMC, CARE, NRC, ZOA, IRC, GOAL, CARE, SCI, Samaritan Purse, OCHA, ICRC Agenda 1. Review of action points from the previous meeting 2. Information Management Updates 3. Regional Information 4. Cluster prioritization activity COVID-19 5. EHF Flexibility AOB Agenda and notes. Decisions, issues 2. Information Report submission status Management • Most partners submitted April’s report on time. But there are still partners who have not Updates submitted their reports. If partners don’t have any activity in the reporting month, they are encouraged to send an email notification. Using ReportHub will solve the issue. Progress against the HRP • The cluster identified 2.1M people in need and targeted 1.9M people. From this, through partners, the cluster can reach 247, 769 people from Jan – March 2020. In March 2020, 39,858 People were reached (37,555 with Shelter reconstruction/repair, 1,812 with Emergency shelter/NFI and 491 with cash for shelter/rent). The largest distribution is in Oromia Region (152,034 people) followed by Somali Region (66,412 people) and SNNP Region (17,488 people). ReportHub • ReportHub is an online reporting platform used for reporting 5Ws and stock. It is currently the primary reporting tool used by the ESNFI cluster. Maintenance of the tool is completed and training for partners was provided last week. Most partners reported their activities using the tool for April.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: Humanitarian Access Situation Report
    ETHIOPIA Humanitarian Access Situation Report January - March 2020 This report is produced by OCHA Ethiopia in collaboration with humanitarian partners. It covers the period January to March 2020. The next report will be issued in June 2020. OVERVIEW • The operational environment to relief operations North Number of incidents by woreda Western Central remained permissive through the reporting period. Western TIGRAY Eastern 1 - 2 3 - 4 5 - 6 South Kilbet Most access impediments continue related to hos- North Rasu Gondar Eastern Wag tilities, intra-community conflicts or social unrest, Central Southern Gondar Hamra West Fantana hindering the quality of the humanitarian response, Gondar AMHARA North Wello Rasu AFAR and to COVID-19. South Awsi Gondar Rasu Metekel Hari Awi West East South Wello Gojam Rasu • Humanitarian partners are committed to support BENISHANGUL Gojam Oromia GUMUZ Siti the government response to COVID-19 and ensure North North Gabi Kemashi Horo Shewa DIRE DAWA West Shewa Rasu that critical activities are sustained. Partners are Gudru West Mao Komo Wellega Wellega Shewa Fafan Special East Addis Ababa actively implementing precautionary measures to Wellega HARARI Kelem Wellega East South West West ensure the safety of aid personnel and the popula- Buno Bedele East Hararge Hararge Ilu Aba Shewa Shewa Guraghe GAMBELA Bora Jarar tion. Nuwer Arsi Erer Agnewak Jimma Hadiya Siltie Sheka Yem Sp.Halaba Sp. OROMIA Kembata Mejenger Kefa Doolo Dawuro Tibaro Nogob SOMALI • The humanitarian community is working with gov- Bench Maji West Arsi Konta Sp. Wolayita Bale Gofa Sidama ernment counterparts to ensure that partners can Gamo Korahe Mirab Basketo Gedeo continue movements and operations throughout Omo Amaro SNNP Derashe Alle Guji Shabelle the country, bearing in mind restrictions to contain South Omo BurjiWest Guji Konso Afder the spread of COVID-19.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Agency IDP Returnees Need Assessment Report East and West Hararghe Zones of Oromia
    Multi-Agency IDP Returnees Need Assessment Report East and West Hararghe Zones of Oromia 15-26 August 2019 Contents Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................................... iii Key Messages..................................................................................................................................................... iv 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 2 Assessment Methodology............................................................................................................................ 2 2.1 Information Needs and Analysis Framework ...................................................................................... 2 2.2 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 2 2.3 Team composition ................................................................................................................................ 2 2.4 Limitations ........................................................................................................................................... 3 3 Assessment Findings .................................................................................................................................... 3 3.1 Profile of the IDPs and IDP returnees
    [Show full text]
  • Detainees Are Matching International Standards
    Henok Birhanu /ICRC ICRC President, Peter Maurer, accorded warm welcome up on his arrival at Jigjiga airport as part of his visit to Ethiopia. The ICRC is present in Ethiopia since the beginning of the 1977 Ethio-Somalia armed conflict. Its current main activities in the country are: addressing the humanitarian needs of the people affected by conflict and violence through an integrated multi-disciplinary response, and reinforced protection dialogue with weapon bearers, visiting places of detention so as to ensure both the treatment and conditions of detainees are matching international standards. Helping people with physical disabilities (PWDs) get access to quality and sustainable physical rehabilitation services. It also works closely with the Ethiopian Red Cross Society (ERCS) to restore family links among people separated by armed conflict and other situations of violence and provides assistance mainly to people displaced by ethnic conflict. The ICRC also promotes the knowledge of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) among members of defense and police forces as well as higher learning institutions, legal professionals and policy makers. DETAINEES Oromia and Southern regions enabling them to improve their operation and In agreement with the national authorities, maintenance management plans. the ICRC visits federal and regional prisons as Assisted detention authorities in five well as police stations so as to improve both regions in kitchen design and supported the conditions of detention and the treatment eight other prisons in improving their fuel of detainees, in accordance with international saving stoves. norms and standards. Provided medical and technical assistance In 2019, the ICRC: for 19 prison clinics in federal and regional prisons in Addis Ababa, Oromia, Amhara, Visited more than 51,100 detainees in Somali and Benishangul-Gumuz to 66 different places of detention, including improve the service delivery of detainees.
    [Show full text]
  • Care Forgood Proposal Template.Indd
    CARE © Sankalpa Acharya/CARE India Rapid Market Assessment Report, Kumbi Woreda, East Hararghe Zones, Oromia Region, Ethiopia CARE E thiopia September, 2020 Author: Serkalem Getachew: Food Security and Livelhood Advisor, at CARE Ethiopia 1 Contents 1. Background ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Objectives .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 3. Methodology ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 4. Limitations ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 5. Result and Discussion ............................................................................................................................................ 4 5.1. Community priority needs and availability of commodities in the market needed by the shock-affected population. .................................................................................................................................................................... 4 5.2. Market Functionality ..................................................................................................................................... 6 5.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Displacement Monitoring Report (Oct – Dec 2015)
    INTERNAL DISPLACEMENT MONITORING REPORT October - December 2015 Executive Summary 1 TIGRAY The International Organization for Migration (IOM) Special Liaison Office (SLO) in AFAR Addis Ababa, with funding from the European Commission for Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection (ECHO), works with the Government of Ethiopia and humanitarian AMHARA partners to conduct internal displacement monitoring in multiple regions in Ethiopia. 65,766 The objective is to bring about timely and accurate data, on the causes, number of BENISHANGUL 7,945 GUMZ individuals displaced, locations of displacement as well needs verses response, in order DIRE DAWA ADDIS ABABA to improve humanitarian response and to advocate for durable solutions. HARERI OROMIA The Internal Displacement Monitoring Report (IDMR) is compiled and presented GAMBELLA on a quarterly basis. It is an activity jointly undertaken by IOM, National Disaster SOMALI 2,870 Management Coordination Council (NDMCC), Regional Disaster Prevention and SNNP 29,745 Preparedness Bureaus (DPPBs), humanitarian partners, and NGO partners in order to ensure a more targeted, coordinated and needs based response. The quarterly IDMR 76,170 for the period October to december 2015 incorporated a trend analysis comparing the 495 same quarter in 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015; with the intention to show the reader the New displacement by Region scale, dynamics and seasonal trends of internal displacement over time. (October - December 2015) 2 Methodology The methods used to collect data for the quarterly Internal Matrix (DTM) and IDP registrations in ‘protracted’2 IDP sites. In Displacement Monitoring Report were: Key informant interviews with addition, IOM used census data and government led joint multi- local authorities and IDP representatives, Focus Group Discussions agency assessment reports to validate the data.
    [Show full text]