Hameldon Hill Wind Farm Extension Supplementary Landscape And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hameldon Hill Wind Farm Extension Supplementary Landscape And Hameldon Hill Wind Farm Extension Supplementary Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment 403-0799-00010 August 2010 RWE Npower Renewables Ref: 403/0799/00010 Hameldon Hill Wind Farm Extension, Supplementary Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment i August 2010 CONTENTS 1.0 Supplementary Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Comparative ZTV Analysis 1 1.3 Comparative Viewpoint Analysis 1 1.4 Forest of Bowland AONB 4 1.5 Design and Location of Scheme 6 1.6 Woodland and Tree Planting 6 1.7 Summary and Conclusions 6 FIGURE LIST Figure LV-1.34 ZTV: Hameldon Submitted Layout and Hameldon Revised Layout Figure LV-1.35 Viewpoint 1 – Shuttleworth Recreation Ground Figure LV-1.36 Viewpoint 5 – Sainsburys, Burnley Figure LV-1.37 Viewpoint 6 – Southern Edge of Burnley off A682 Figure LV-1.38 Viewpoint 8 – Tree Panopticum, Burnley Figure LV-1.39 Viewpoint 9 – Burnley Way Figure LV-1.40 Viewpoint 14 – Hapton Inn off the A679 Figure LV-1.41 Viewpoint 15 – A678 Padiham Figure LV-1.42 Viewpoint 16 – Thorny Bank Figure LV-1.43 Additional Viewpoint 1 – Nick of Pendle Photomontage Figure LV-1.44 Additional Viewpoint 1 – Nick of Pendle Cumulative Wireline RWE Npower Renewables Ref: 403/0799/00010 Hameldon Hill Wind Farm Extension, Supplementary Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment 1 August 2010 9. The three existing turbines at Hameldon are 90m to blade tip and the proposed three were 110m, but 1.0 Supplementary Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment have now been revised to be two at 110m and one at 100m. The reduced height turbine is located at grid reference E80730, N29879. 1.1 Introduction 10. Initially a comparative zone of theoretical visibility (ZTV) was produced, comparing the submitted 1. SLR has been instructed to prepare a supplementary landscape and visual impact assessment scheme in 2009 against that of the revised layout. Wirelines for all eight viewpoints within 5km of the (hereafter referred to as “LVIA”) of the proposed Hameldon Hill Wind Farm extension, following proposed Hameldon Wind farm were then produced, again to allow comparisons to be made between th objections received from the Defence Estates, dated 15 February 2010 and a consultation response the revised and the previously submitted schemes. Viewpoints beyond 5km away have not been re- th received from Natural England, dated 16 February 2010. assessed as the differences in turbine height proposed are unlikely to be noticeable at these distances. 2. Firstly, the objection received from the Defence Estates identified that the eastern most “Turbine 3 will be approximately 1.18km from; in line of sight to; and will cause unacceptable interference to the 11. The additional photomontage at Nick of Pendle has been produced using the revised turbine heights. Meteorological Office radar at Hameldon Hill. If the proposed turbine is constructed at this location, at the proposed height of 110m to blade tip, the radar beam will be obscured resulting in unacceptable 1.2 Comparative ZTV Analysis degradation to Meteorological Office services. However, if the developer is able to reduce the blade tip height of Turbine 3 to 100m, we will be happy to reassess the proposal and it is likely that we will 12. As illustrated in Figure LV-1.34, the two alternative layouts would have virtually identitical zones of be able to remove our Met Office objection.” theoretical visibility. 3. This supplementary LVIA therefore initially considers the potential effect on the landscape and visual 13. Where there is a predicted reduction in extent, as a result of the slightly shorter turbine at the east of amenity of the site and surrounding area of a revised turbine layout based on reducing the height of the array, this is generally limited to the edges of unchanged areas of visibility, such as adjacent to the Turbine 3 to comply with Defence Estates requirements. All other aspects of the proposed Long Causeway at 4km to the east. development would remain the same. 14. There are small areas to the south east of the proposed development, particularly on the summits of 4. Secondly, the consultation response received from Natural England requested further consideration of Small Shaw Height (409m AOD), Higher Hogshead (445m AOD) and Freeholds Top (454m AOD) at the local landscape and visual impacts of the proposals, inter alia, in relation to potential effects upon over 5km away that would previously have had theoretical visibility of the submitted layout, but would the Forest of Bowland AONB, design and location of the scheme and the potential for mitigation have no visibility as a result of the revised layout. woodland and tree planting. 15. There are also areas to the west of the study area from the centre and northern fringes of Preston in 5. This supplementary LVIA therefore also presents an additional photomontage from the requested excess of 20km, where there would be a reduction in theoretical visibility as a result of the revised public viewpoint at the Nick of Pendle, Forest of Bowland AONB and further information in relation to scheme. landscaping proposals as set out in the original Design and Access Statement, 2009. 16. Overall the differences between the two layouts are negligible to slight, with the revised layout being 6. This additional assessment has been prepared by SLR Consulting Ltd, a multidisciplinary beneficial due to the reduction in theoretical visibility. environmental consultancy, with a landscape practice of over 40 staff which is Registered with the Landscape Institute. The project team consisted of Bob Bainsfair, a Chartered Landscape Architect 1.3 Comparative Viewpoint Analysis with over 15 years experience, Simon Higson, a Chartered Landscape Architect with over 10 years of experience and Ben Pickering, a graduate Landscape Architect with over 2 years experience and 17. The following sub-section of the supplementary assessment considers comparative effects of the two support from specialist GIS staff. This is the same senior team that worked on the original LVIA in alternative turbine heights on selected viewpoints: 2009. • Viewpoint 1 – School Recreation Ground south of Hameldon Terrace and George IV Public 1.1.1 Methodology House (off A646); 7. This additional assessment follows the same methodology, process and evaluation criteria as used for • Viewpoint 5 – Sainsburys; the original LVIA in 2009. The assessment has involved desktop study, data processing and analysis, as well as interpretation using professional judgement. • Viewpoint 6 – Southern edge of Burnley off A682; 8. Since baseline conditions include the existing wind farm at Hameldon Hill, immediately adjacent, the • Viewpoint 8 – Tree Panopticum, Burnley; original LVIA in 2009 focused primarily on the potential cumulative or additional effects on landscape and visual amenity arising from the introduction of the proposed turbines in conjunction with the • Viewpoint 9 – Burnley Way; adjacent turbines. RWE Npower Renewables Ref: 403/0799/00010 Hameldon Hill Wind Farm Extension, Supplementary Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment 2 August 2010 • Viewpoint 14 – Hapton Inn off the A679; 24. Again, differences between the submitted and revised layout would be minimal (as shown on Figure LV-1.36), however, only the blade tips of Turbine 3 would be visible above the skyline in the revised • Viewpoint 15 – A678 Padiham; and layout whereas the hub and blade tips are visible above the skyline in the submitted layout. Sitting lower in the landscape, the revised turbine also relates better to the sloping landform beyond the • Viewpoint 16 – Thorny Bank turbines and thus may be a better option. 1.3.1 Viewpoint 1: School Recreation Ground south of Hameldon Terrace and George IV 25. As a result the slight cumulative magnitude of change predicted in the original LVIA in 2009 would Public House (off A646) remain the same. Thus the cumulative impact on landscape character and visual amenity for residents and road users will remain moderate/minor and will not represent a significant effect. 18. This viewpoint is located at E380854, N433402 on the intersection of the A671 Padiham Road and the A646 Kiddrow Lane, on the boundary of the school recreation ground. This viewpoint represents views 1.3.3 Viewpoint 6: Southern edge of Burnley off A682 obtained by local residents, road users and users of the recreation/school grounds. 26. This viewpoint is located at E383023, N430419 on the southern edge of Burnley on the A682, 19. The submitted turbine layout (as shown on Figure LV-1.35) appear as a pair of turbines to the west Manchester Road looking west, close to a public right of way. It represents views obtained by local and an outlier to the east, almost mirroring the appearance of the existing turbines on Hameldon Hill. residents, road users and recreational visitors. The eastern most proposed turbine (Turbine 3) overlaps with the western most turbine of the existing wind farm cluster. The nearest proposed turbine will be 3.71km away from this viewpoint. The 27. The existing wind turbines are situated some 2.5km away and wholly within this moorland fringe valley perceived heights of the hubs and blade tips vary but the difference is only marginal and does not side, where the turbines are mostly visible above the intervening ridge and appear as a pair (to the appear out of keeping with the sloping nature of the backgrounding landform. The overall layout of the right of the view) and an outlier (to the left of the view), but generally as a simple group. The southern existing and submitted turbines appear balanced despite overlapping. The blade tips of all of the most existing turbine is partially backgrounded by elevated land to the west. submitted turbines break the skyline. 28. The predicted view for the submitted scheme (as illustrated in the wireline on Figure LV-1.37) 20.
Recommended publications
  • Heald Top Farm, Bacup, Lancashire
    Heald Top Farm, Bacup, Lancashire Ecological Appraisal and Initial Breeding Bird Survey June 2012 QUANTS environmental Ltd Tel: 01765 600799 Email: [email protected] Web: www.quantsenvironmental.com QUANTS environmental Ltd Heald Top Farm, Bacup, Lancashire Ecological Appraisal & Breeding Bird Survey Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 3 2 Survey Methodology .......................................................................................................... 4 2.0 Desk Study ........................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Ecological Appraisal Field Survey ........................................................................................ 4 2.2 Breeding Bird Survey ........................................................................................................... 4 3 Survey Results ................................................................................................................... 6 3.0 Desk Study ........................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Field Survey ......................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Photos .................................................................................................................................. 9 4 Evaluation
    [Show full text]
  • Hameldon Hill Wind Farm Extension Planning Statement
    Hameldon Hill Wind Farm Extension Planning Statement Submitted on behalf of RWE NPower Renewables Limited to Burnley Borough Council December 2009 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 The Proposed Development ............................................................................................................................................. 2 3 Planning Policy ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 4 Planning Considerations ................................................................................................................................................ 14 Hameldon Hill Wind Farm Extension 1 Planning Statement 1 Introduction 1.1.1 This Planning Statement accompanies the planning application by RWE Npower Renewables Ltd (hereafter referred to as RWE NRL) for the extension to the existing wind farm at Hameldon Hill in Burnley, originally commissioned in February 2007. The applicant seeks planning permission for three further wind turbines and associated infrastructure, as set out in Section 2.1. 1.1.2 Renewable energy developments are key to the United Kingdom’s attempts to tackle climate change and to deploy cleaner sources of energy. Key Principle 1(1) in PPS 22 provides that renewable energy developments are capable of being
    [Show full text]
  • Burnley Patient Participation Network Meeting Minutes of the Meeting Held on Wednesday 20 March 2013 at 17:30-19:00
    Burnley Patient Participation Network Meeting Minutes of the meeting held on Wednesday 20 March 2013 at 17:30-19:00 PRESENT: Practice Representing: Gordon Howley Chair Dianne Gardner Burnley Locality Manager Edwina Foote Richard Aslin Yorkshire St Joanne Jacques Rosegrove Lynn Lonsdale Burnley Wood Heather Mulley Parkside Walter Park St Nicholas Heather Hodson Oxford Road Anne Fittock Medicine Optimisation Lead, ELCCG Tricia Brindle Groundwork Pennine Lancs Min No: ACTION Apologies Apologies were received from Marina Buckley, Nora Myles, Malcolm Beck, Roger Creegan, Richard Twiddy, Mrs Cunningham, George Fort, Marilyn Hawke Welcome & Introductions Introductions were made around the table Minutes of the Last Meeting-5 December 2012 The minutes were agreed as a true record. 4. Matters Arising Expert Patient – Meeting held at Yorkshire St to discuss roll out. Agreed to promote dates of programmes across all Burnley Practices plus review if there is a shorter programme that could be implemented. Health Improvement Mapping – would benefit from a report being produced in easy read version. Once produced circulate report and members to take to PPGs. BPPN to meet in different practices – GH to investigate opportunities. Need to ensure minutes go to all practices. GH GH to attend a Practice Manager meeting to discuss. 5. Medicines Management Anne Fittock, Medicine Optimisation lead, was in attendance to answer member questions. All practices have medicine management input and they link into all Locality Steering Groups. Medicine Managers: 8 of the 17 Burnley practices have a medicine manager and there are issues around training and development of these posts. Other localities have agreed different ways of working to address the inequity across practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Burnley Local Plan 2006
    Burnley Local Plan Second Review - 2006 1 - INTRODUCTION PURPOSE OF THE PLAN 1.1 The Burnley Local Plan Second Review (the Plan) was prepared under section 36 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. The Plan sets out the Council’s detailed policies and proposals for the future development and use of land in the Borough up to 2016. 1.2 The land use planning framework provided by the Plan is wide ranging. It sets policies that protect and enhance valuable resources such as the countryside, Green Belt, listed and historic buildings, and features of ecological value. It also contains proposals that identify particular areas and sites where future development for housing, shops, employment and other land uses will take place. 1.3 The Plan forms part of the Development Plan for the Borough, together with the Joint Lancashire Structure Plan (2005). The Plan covers the period 2001 - 2016. The Plan was Adopted on 21st April 2006 and replaces the Burnley District Local Plan First Review (1991). FORM AND CONTENT OF THE PLAN 1.4 The Plan has two parts: this Written Statement and a Proposals Map. The Proposals Map identifies specific sites for housing, employment and other uses, and areas where particular policies will apply e.g. conservation areas, and Green Belt. 1.5 The Written Statement outlines the Council’s Vision for the Borough, the Strategy it will pursue in seeking to achieve this Vision, and the land use policies and proposals that are intended to bring about this Vision. The Written Statement contains a number of separate chapters - the contents of which are outlined below.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Statement Main Text Volume 1 Proposed Three Wind
    ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT MAIN TEXT VOLUME 1 PROPOSED THREE WIND TURBINES ON LAND ADJACENT TO HAMELDON HILL WIND FARM May 2016 1 Environmental Statement This Environmental Statement (ES) is prepared for the submission for planning approval of three wind turbines on land adjacent to the Hameldon Hill Wind Farm. The statement is prepared by AAH Planning Consultants with contributions from: Copies of the ES can be obtained either through downloading from the website www.hameldonhillwindfarm.com or by contacting: AAH Planning Consultants, 2 Bar Lane, York, YO1 6JU Tel: 01904 629258 Email: [email protected] The cost of printing for paper copies will be charged at cost price to cover the cost incurred for printing and postage. DVD versions can also be provided at a cost of £10. Paper copies will also be available for public viewing at Burnley Borough Council’s planning department at Housing and Development Control, Contact Centre, 9 Parker Lane, Burnley, BB11 2BY during the following office hours: 9am to 5pm Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday 10am to 5pm on Wednesdays The Non-Technical Summary of the ES is also available free of charge upon request and again available for download from the above mentioned website. 2 Contents 1.0 Introduction to the Proposal ....................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Approach to Environmental Assessment .................................................................................... 5 3.0 Site Description ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • May Newsletter 2012
    The Clayton Harrier Newsletter www.clayton-le-moors-harriers.co.uk May 2012 Helena Leathley FU18 Lancashire Fell Champion Pendle Fell Race 7th April [Photo: Woodentops] 1 CONTACTS The Clayton Website www.clayton-le-moors-harriers.co.uk Please send website contributions to Martin Brady email: [email protected] Race Results All your races will count towards the Club's 2012 Fell Runner of the Year and Road Runner of the Year provided the Club Statisticians have your race results. Please send your Road Results to Richard Lawson 55 Highfield Avenue, Burnley BB10 2PS email: valric55[at]virginmedia.com Telephone 01282 423808 Please send your Fell Results to Andy Brown 2 Brennand Terrace, Grindleton, Clitheroe, BB7 4QZ Telephone: 01200 440880 Email: [email protected] Please send your Cross-Country Results to Harry Manning 4 Wiswell Close, Burnley BB10 2DW Telephone 01282 830458 Cross-Country Results for those races that qualify towards the Club's 2011/12 Palladium awards will be obtained by the Cross-Country Statistician, Harry Manning. Forthcoming Fixtures Please notify the Fixtures Secretary, Katy Thompson, 16 Ainsdale Drive, Darwen. BB3 2EQ Telephone: 01254 772013; email: [email protected] The Fixtures Secretary will forward details to the Newsletter Editor for publication The Clayton Newsletter Editor: Peter Booth email: [email protected] Telephone: 01282 698268; mobile 07724 085873 22 Ann Street, Barrowford, Nelson, BB9 8QH Publication: Blackburn College Reprographics Distribution: Michael Frost Advertising rates are available from the editor. Advertisers' products and services are not endorsed by the committee. Copy deadline for the June issue: Monday, 7th May 2 Boothy’s Bit Jack Betney I received news of Jack’s death just before the April Newsletter was printed.
    [Show full text]
  • West Pennine Link with the Pennine Bridleway National Trail
    Report of Meeting Date Corporate Director of General Purposes Committee 18/10/07 Governance HIGHWAYS ACT 1980 – SECTION 25 PROPOSED CREATION OF BRIDLEWAYS – WEST PENNINE LINK WITH THE BRIDLEWAY NATIONAL TRAIL PURPOSE OF REPORT 1. To consider proposals by Lancashire County Council for the creation of a network of bridleways in the Boroughs of Chorley, Hyndburn, Burnley and Rossendale as part of the West Pennine Link with the Pennine Bridleway National Trail. RECOMMENDATION(S) 2. That no objection be raised to the proposal by Lancashire County Council for the creation of a bridleway at White Coppice, Anglezarke. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION(S) 3. Conferring bridleway status on the claimed route would recognise and thus formally protect usage of the route for horse riders. The Council has, however, no direct information on such usage of the route/paths concerned. The Council, whilst not averse to the conferral of bridleway status on the path concerned, is not seeking to promote the claim and would have no evidence to offer should the claim result in the calling of a public local inquiry. In the circumstances, the decision to raise no objection to the claim does not detract from the merits of that claim or commit the Council to support a claim about which it has no information. ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS CONSIDERED AND REJECTED 4. The only other alternatives available would have been to endorse the claim, for which the Council has no evidence, or to oppose it, for which course of action the Council equally has no evidence. CORPORATE PRIORITIES 5. This report does not relate to the following Strategic Objectives: Put Chorley at the heart of regional Improved access to public services economic development in the central Lancashire sub region Improving equality of opportunity Develop the character and feel of Updated Template July 2007 and life chance Chorley as a good place to live Involving People in their Ensure Chorley is a performing Communities Organisation BACKGROUND 6.
    [Show full text]
  • (As Amended) the Pennine Reach Quality Partnership
    TRANSPORT ACT 2000 (AS AMENDED) THE PENNINE REACH QUALITY PARTNERSHIP SCHEME 2016 Made 2016 Arrangement of the Scheme Article Page number 1. DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION ..................................................................................... 2 2. DATE AND PERIOD OF OPERATION ....................................................................................... 3 3. SCHEME PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES .................................................................................. 3 4. SCHEME AREA AND SCOPE .................................................................................................... 4 5. FACILITIES ................................................................................................................................. 5 6. CONDITIONS OF USE ................................................................................................................ 5 7. MONITORING AND REVIEW ..................................................................................................... 6 8. ENFORCEMENT AND APPEALS PROCESS ............................................................................ 7 9. NO JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY ........................................................................................ 7 10. CONTACT ADDRESSES ............................................................................................................ 7 SCHEDULE 1 ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 07514520059.501 Burnley Wildlife and Habitat Survey Version A.0
    December 2007 - i - 07514520059.501 Burnley Wildlife and Habitat Survey Version A.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives................................................................................................1 1.2 Limitations ...............................................................................................1 2.0 LEGISLATIVE BACKGROUND AND POLICY FRAMEWORK.................. 3 2.1 Planning Policy........................................................................................3 2.2 The Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006...................4 2.3 Biodiversity Action Planning ....................................................................4 2.4 National Government Performance Indicators ........................................5 3.0 METHODOLOGY........................................................................................ 6 3.1 Desk Study ..............................................................................................6 3.2 Field Survey.............................................................................................6 3.3 Arrangement of Access ...........................................................................7 3.4 Database and GIS ...................................................................................7 4.0 RESULTS.................................................................................................... 9 4.1 Desk Study
    [Show full text]
  • Burnley Council Burnley by Produced
    Produced by Burnley Council Burnley by Produced Graphics Graphics and © Communications, Burnley Council 2008. [t] 01282 425011. Job_3110. www.visitburnley.com visit Way Burnley the about information latest the For Tel. 01282 664421 01282 Tel. Croft Street, Burnley BB11 2EF BB11 Burnley Street, Croft Centre Information Tourist Burnley FurtherInformation Urmston (Burnley Tourism) of Burnley Council. Council. Burnley of Tourism) (Burnley Urmston Burnley), Jacqueline Whitaker (Burnley Tourism) and Amanda Amanda and Tourism) (Burnley Whitaker Jacqueline Burnley), The leaflet was written and compiled by Keith Wilson (Forest of of (Forest Wilson Keith by compiled and written was leaflet The June Evans and Andrew Dacre. Dacre. Andrew and Evans June landowners concerned and especially to Derek Seed, Bob and and Bob Seed, Derek to especially and concerned landowners involved in the research and construction work and to the the to and work construction and research the in involved Thanks are also extended to all individuals and organisations organisations and individuals all to extended also are Thanks help from Kim Coverdale from Lancashire Wildlife Trust. Wildlife Lancashire from Coverdale Kim from help some steep climbs and descents. and climbs steep some and Richard Catlow who put together the first set of leaflets with with leaflets of set first the together put who Catlow Richard and with tracks and paths Moorland Difficulty: with the original idea for the Burnley Way - especially David Ellis Ellis David especially - Way Burnley the for idea
    [Show full text]
  • BURNLEY RURAL MASTERPLANNING STUDY Produced with the Enabling Support of CABE February 2011
    BURNLEY RURAL MASTERPLANNING STUDY Produced with the Enabling support of CABE February 2011 Introduction This piece of work was carried out by Burnley Borough Council with the Enabling support of the Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE) to inform the development of local planning policies in relation to the development and sustainability the Borough’s rural settlements. The work has been financed with the Department of Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) and Department of Communities and Local Government (CLG) Rural Masterplanning Fund. The purpose of the fund is to provide resources to investigate where housing and other development could be located to support planning for growth and sustainability of rural settlements. In the Burnley area, this work has focused on issues of urban design and land use for clusters of small towns and villages, and detailed character and landscape appraisals to determine the physical capacity for development. This piece of work has evolved against the background of seismic shifts to the national planning policy context and in anticipation of changes to the statutory system mooted in the Localism Bill. Although primarily this work will form part of the detailed evidence base for the Borough’s Local Development Framework, the study could also be used as a springboard for neighbourhood planning, driven by local rural communities. Eight settlements were selected for examination under the study, each distinguished by individual identity in their form and relationship with Burnley’s hinterland landscape. Whilst they could be assessed individually their local governance favours grouping them into Parish Council clusters, within which the physical features of each are evaluated but their interdependence also taken into account when considering the case for development.
    [Show full text]
  • LAND Programme
    Inspiring Creativity conference This one-day conference in October 2004 for primary teachers, headteachers and artists focused on creative approaches to teaching and learning through the arts. Artists Gordon MacLellan and Hugh Nankivell led sessions reflecting their work with Land. Other artists involved included: Kjartan Poskitt, Pat Southern and Steve Hutton. The event was attended by 98 people and helped set the scene for the start of the Arts Council’s Creative Partnerships scheme. Young Carers' Retreat In July 2005 a pioneering scheme, devised by Land in partnership with the Young Carers’ Project, resulted in the first ever arts-based course for young people who care for an incapacitated adult. The 4-day residential course, held at Whitehough Outdoor Education Centre near the village of Barley in Pendle, enabled 50 young carers from across East Lancashire to enjoy a complete break from routine. They immersed themselves in arts activities led by six professional artists, including mask and puppet-making, willow-weaving, music and drama, culminating in a performance. In keeping with the aims of Land they also left behind an artistic legacy in the form of willow sculptures of a heron and a unicorn in the landscape for others to enjoy. The young people were centrally involved in planning and organising their week, and their activities were filmed and photographed to provide them with a lasting reminder. At a celebratory event at Burnley Mechanics in October, attended by 82 people including the Mayor of Rossendale, each member of the course was presented with a souvenir DVD - which you can watch HERE or via the Project Videos link above the images to the right.
    [Show full text]