Harle Syke and Briercliffe Hayley Merrick
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Asia Fiber Public Company Limited
ASIA FIBER PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED PRODUCTS (All our products) NYLON FOY (1.5 Kgs. BB) NYLON POY (11 Kgs. BB) NYLON FDY ( 9 Kgs. BB) / / / YARN COUNT LUSTER YARN COUNT LUSTER High Tenacity 70D/24F SEMI DULL 50D/12F SEMI DULL YARN COUNT LUSTER 100D/24F SEMI DULL 88D/24F SEMI DULL 210D/24F* BRIGHT 200D/48F SEMI DULL 118D/24F SEMI DULL 420D/48F BRIGHT 125D/34F SEMI DULL 630D/72F BRIGHT 840D/96F BRIGHT NYLON TEXTURED YARN 1050D/120F BRIGHT YARN COUNT PLY TYPE LUSTER FINISHED 1260D/144F BRIGHT 40D/12F 1 SEMI DULL R.W. or DYED 1680D/192F BRIGHT 40D/12F 2 TWISTED SEMI DULL R.W. or DYED *4 Kgs. BB / 70D/24F 1 SEMI DULL R.W. or DYED 70D/24F 2 PARALLEL SEMI DULL R.W. FUNCTIONAL PRODUCTS 70D/24F 2 INTERMINGLED SEMI DULL R.W. or DYED POY, FDY DTY 70D/24F 2,3,4 TWISTED SEMI DULL R.W. or DYED - ANTI BACTERIA - MOISTURE MANAGEMENT 100D/24F 1 SEMI DULL R.W. or DYED - DOPE - DYED YARN - ANTI BACTERIA 100D/24F 2 PARALLEL SEMI DULL R.W. - DOPE - DYED YARN 100D/24F 2 INTERMINGLED SEMI DULL R.W. or DYED - RECYCLED DYED YARN 100D/24F 2,3,4,6 TWISTED SEMI DULL R.W. or DYED NYLON POLYESTER WOVEN FABRIC / KIND OF FABRIC WARPxWEFT LUSTER WIDTH 190T NYLON TAFFETA 70D x 70D SEMI DULL x SEMI DULL 60" 210T NYLON TAFFETA 70D x 70D SEMI DULL x SEMI DULL 60" 210T NYLON RIPSTOP 70D x 70D SEMI DULL x SEMI DULL 60" NYLON SATIN 70D x 100D BRIGHT x SEMI DULL 60" NYLON OXFORD 210D x 210D SEMI DULL x SEMI DULL 60" NYLON OXFORD 420D x 420D SEMI DULL x SEMI DULL 60" NYLON TASLAN 70D x 160D(ATY) SEMI DULL x SEMI DULL 60" 190T POLYESTER TAFFETA 75D x 75D SEMI DULL x SEMI DULL 60" POLYESTER TEXTURE 75D x 75D SEMI DULL x SEMI DULL 60" POLYESTER TASLAN 75D x 175D(ATY) SEMI DULL x SEMI DULL 60" POLYESTER NYLON TAFFETA FABRIC WITH WATER / NYLON POLYESTER TWILL 70D x 75D TRILOBAL x BRIGHT 60" RESISTANCE FINISHING TESTED BY THTI FINISHING : PLAIN DYED, RESIN FINISHED, WATER PROOF, WATER REPELLENT, CIRE(CHINTZ), ( AATCC 127 AATCC 42 STANDARD ) WRINKLE(WASHER), PIGMENT / POLYURETHANE / ACRYLIC & INORGANIC COATINGS, / FOR CLASSIFICATION OF SURGICAL GOWN BARRIER ANTI BACTERIA, ANTI MOSQUITO, MOISTURE MANAGEMENT, ETC. -
Study on Improving the Production Rate by Rapier Looms in Textile Industry Aby Chummar, Soni Kuriakose, George Mathew
ISSN: 2277-3754 ISO 9001:2008 Certified International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT) Volume 2, Issue 7, January 2013 Study on Improving the Production Rate by Rapier Looms in Textile Industry Aby Chummar, Soni Kuriakose, George Mathew the company. It is mainly manufactured by the shuttle looms. Abstract— In India the textile industry is growing very fast. Conventional shuttle looms are mainly used during the Most of the earlier established textile industries are using weaving process in the industry. All these shuttle looms are conventional shuttle looms for the production of the cloth. But the too old. In these present conventional shuttle looms, it is advancement in the technology made the textile industry more competitive. The effective usage of the new methods of the necessary to pass a shuttle weighing around half a kilogram weaving technology, which is more energy efficient, makes the through the warp shed to insert a length of weft yarn which production more economical. It is found out that the usage of the weighs only few grams. The shuttle has to be accelerated conventional looms badly affects the cloth production. This study rapidly at the starting of picking cycle and also to be focuses on identifying the problems associated with the low decelerated, stopped abruptly at the opposite end. This production by the shuttle loom and suggesting suitable methods process creates heavy noise and shock and consumes by which these problems can be reduced. considerable energy. Beat-up is done by slay motion which again weighs a few hundred kilograms. The wear life of the Index Terms—Greige Fabric Picks, Rapier Loom, Shuttle Loom. -
Local Development Framework for Pendle Conservation Area Design and Development Guidance Supplementary Planning Document Final
Local Development Framework for Pendle Conservation Area Design and Development Guidance Supplementary Planning Document Final Consultation Statement (Regulation 17 (1)) August 2008 For an alternative format of this document phone 01282 661330 Conservation Areas Design and Development SPD Regulation 17(1) Statement Consultation undertaken in accordance with Regulation 17 (1) The Council is required to prepare its Supplementary Planning Documents (SPDs) in accordance with procedures set out in the Town and Country Planning (Local Development) (England) (Amended) Regulations 2008. Regulation 17 requires that before an SPD is adopted, a Consultation Statement be prepared setting out who was consulted in connection with the preparation of the SPD, how they were consulted, a summary of the main issues raised in those consultations and how those issues have been addressed in the SPD. The SPD has also been prepared and consulted upon in accordance with the Council’s adopted Statement of Community Involvement (SCI). Pre-production stage Before work began on drafting the SPD a number of organisations were consulted on the SPD objectives. These are listed in appendix A. These groups/people were sent a list of SPD objectives that had been prepared, in draft, by the Council and covered issues that the Council considered should be covered by the SPD. This was a four week consultation period which ran from 21st May to 15th June 2007. In line with the Council’s Statement of Community Involvement these groups/persons were consulted by letter which included the proposed objectives and copies of the relevant Local Plan policy (policy 10). In addition copies of ‘Framework’, the newsletter which keeps organisations up to date on the progress of the Local Development Framework, was distributed. -
Weaving Technology: Advances and Challenges Ii
Volume3, Issue 1, Summer 2003 WEAVING TECHNOLOGY: ADVANCES AND CHALLENGES II Abdelfattah M. Seyam College of Textiles, N. C. State University Raleigh, NC, USA ABSTRACT This paper reviews the recent advances in weaving industry and addresses the challenges that face the weaving industry. The paper sheds the light on how the weaving machine manufacturers and woven fabric producers might strengthen the weaving industry by further advance the technology and taking advantages of the current and new advances in weaving technologies. KEYWORDS: Weaving, Automation, Jacquard, Pattern Change. INTRODUCTION and how the weaving machine manufacturers and woven fabric producers Recently weaving machine producers might strengthen the weaving industry by introduced to the woven fabric further advance the technology and taking manufacturers a sizeable number of advantages of the current and new advances technological advances. Examples of such in weaving technologies and supporting advances are higher speeds than seen before, systems. a higher level of automation, a new Jacquard shedding concept, waste reduction, and on- ADVANCES IN WEAVING line quality monitoring. These advances may enable the developed nations to drastically Weaving Speeds lower the labor cost and may be able to At recent machinery shows (ITMA’ 99, compete in the commodity fabric markets. ATME-I’ 2001), weaving machine Despite these significant development in manufacturers showed a broad range of weaving, weavers in the developed and machines with higher speed and rate of developing nations are faced with serious filling insertion (RFI) than seen before. The competition from other fabric forming fabric quality, which is significantly systems such as needlepunching and impacted by efficiency, is a must for the hydroentanglement nonwoven technologies. -
Heald Top Farm, Bacup, Lancashire
Heald Top Farm, Bacup, Lancashire Ecological Appraisal and Initial Breeding Bird Survey June 2012 QUANTS environmental Ltd Tel: 01765 600799 Email: [email protected] Web: www.quantsenvironmental.com QUANTS environmental Ltd Heald Top Farm, Bacup, Lancashire Ecological Appraisal & Breeding Bird Survey Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 3 2 Survey Methodology .......................................................................................................... 4 2.0 Desk Study ........................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Ecological Appraisal Field Survey ........................................................................................ 4 2.2 Breeding Bird Survey ........................................................................................................... 4 3 Survey Results ................................................................................................................... 6 3.0 Desk Study ........................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Field Survey ......................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Photos .................................................................................................................................. 9 4 Evaluation -
Liberty Price List
LIBERTY PRICE LIST Lee County PRICE LIST - March 23, 2018 (Replaces all previous price lists) STYLE # ITEM FABRIC COLOR Origin Cost A 25% OFF 140MBK Police Sweater 100% acrylic Black I $ 62.60 $ 46.95 140MBN Police Sweater 100% acrylic Brown I $ 62.60 $ 46.95 140MNV Police Sweater 100% acrylic Navy I $ 62.60 $ 46.95 180MBK Flaps, Shirt Pocket / pair 100% acrylic Black M $ 6.40 $ 4.80 180MNV Flaps, Shirt Pocket / pair 100% acrylic Navy M $ 6.40 $ 4.80 181MBK Epaulets, Shirt / pair 100% acrylic Black M $ 6.40 $ 4.80 181MNV Epaulets, Shirt / pair 100% acrylic Navy M $ 6.40 $ 4.80 182MBK Zipper for shirts Black I $ 2.90 $ 2.18 182MTN Zipper for shirts Tan I $ 2.90 $ 2.18 182MWH Zipper for shirts White I $ 2.90 $ 2.18 420XBK BB cap, summer 100% cotton Black I $ 7.70 $ 5.78 420XNV BB cap, summer 100% cotton Dark Navy I $ 7.70 $ 5.78 421XNV BB cap, winter 100% cotton Black I $ 7.70 $ 5.78 421XNV BB cap, winter 100% cotton Dark Navy I $ 7.70 $ 5.78 505MBK Security Bomber Polyester oxford Black I $ 55.90 $ 41.93 505MBN Security Bomber Polyester oxford Brown I $ 55.90 $ 41.93 505MNV Security Bomber Polyester oxford Navy I $ 55.90 $ 41.93 506MBK Security Bomber w/epaulets Polyester oxford Black I $ 65.90 $ 49.43 506MBN Security Bomber w/epaulets Polyester oxford Brown I $ 65.90 $ 49.43 506MNV Security Bomber w/epaulets Polyester oxford Navy I $ 65.90 $ 49.43 507MBK Police Bomber Polyester oxford Black I $ 69.00 $ 51.75 507MNV Police Bomber Polyester oxford Navy I $ 69.00 $ 51.75 524MBK Reversible Police Windbreaker Polyester oxford Black / yellow -
Descendants of Edmund Heap 1835-1922
Descendants of Edmund Heap 1835-1922 by Peter H Heap Descendants of Edmund Heap 1835-1922 Descendants of Edmund Heap Generation No. 1 1. EDMUND5 HEAP (JAMES4, JOHN3, JOHN2, (FATHER)1)1 was born 14/03/1835 in BURNLEY Lancashire England, and died 16/06/1922 in Hawthorn Cottage , 17, Lawn Street, BURNLEY. He married HANNAH WILKINSON2 29/08/1857 in Saint James, Burnley, daughter of HENRY WILKINSON and HANNAH SARSFIELD. She was born 1836 in COLNE Lancashire England, and died 01/07/1918 in Hawthorn Cottage , 17, Lawn Street, BURNLEY. Notes for EDMUND HEAP: 1835=Born at Higher Saxifield Farm, Burnley 1841=Higher Saxifield 1851=Higher Saxifield-(Power Loom Weaver) 1860=Building Partnership with brother Thomas trading as T & E Heap of Burnley "Briercliffe Road Workhouse-Because of the inadequacies of the existing workhouse accommodation, a new workhouse for 500 inmates was erected at a 10-acre site on Briercliffe Road in Burnley. The foundation stone was laid in 1873 and the first inmates admitted in March, 1876. The buildings, which cost about £20,000, were designed by William Waddington of Burnley and the building contractors were Messrs Heap of Burnley. The site location and layout are shown on the 1912 map below" 1861=8,Lower Bank Place 1870=Thomas Heap born who died in 1872 1871=36,Rowley Street, Habergham Eaves 1876=Building partnership with brother Thomas dissolved 1881=11,Hawk Street, Burnley 1891=Ashridge House, Thursby Square (Next door to eldest son James Henry at No 4) 1901=1,Tennis Street, Burnley 1904=1,Thursby Square, (Hawthorn Cottage) 1911=17,Lawn Street, "Hawthorne Cottage" (plus son Peter Heap) 1922=Death at 17,Lawn Street, "Hawthorne Cottage", Burnley. -
Briercliffe Nursery Briercliffe Road Burnley
Application Recommended for Approval APP/2009/0683 Briercliffe Ward Full Planning Application Proposed single storey extension to side of nursery BRIERCLIFFE NURSERY BRIERCLIFFE ROAD BURNLEY Background: The proposal is for an extension to the existing Day Nursery to provide additional facilities. The site is located within the Harle Syke Conservation Area. Position of proposed extension View from Briercliffe Road The extension would be attached to the existing building by a glazed link. It would sit at right angles to Briercliffe Road and parallel to Moorview Close. The application has been amended to omit the proposed 3 new car parking spaces within the curtilage, following objections from the highway authority. The boundary fencing would remain as it is now, with no off street parking provided. Objections have been received. Summary of Reason for Recommendation: The development is generally in accordance with the Development Plan, in particular the policies listed below, and there are no other material considerations to indicate that planning permission should not be granted: Relevant Policies: Burnley Local Plan Second Review GP1 – Development within the Urban Boundary GP3 – Design and Quality EW4 – Expansion and Improvement of Existing Business E12 – Development in or adjacent to Conservation Areas CF14 - Provision, Retention and Enhancement of Community Facilities TM15 – Car Parking Standards Site History: APP/2003/0090 - Portacabin to provide new baby unit – refused APP/2003/0269 - Proposed Conservatory – granted APP/2007/1095 – New ramp and railings – granted APP/2008/0204 – Two detached dwellings – refused (appeal dismissed) Consultation Responses: 1. Lancashire County Council (Highways) – Expressed concern about the original proposal to provide three parking spaces within the nursery grounds, with access off Moorview Close. -
Heritage Statement
Heritage Statement Location Chimney at Queen Street Mill Museum, Briercliffe, Burnley. BB10 2HX Queen Street Mill Queen Street Mill is a steam‐powered weaving shed located in the mill village of Harle Syke above the town of Burnley, Lancashire and was built around 1894. Today, with its sister museum at Helmshore, Haslingden it forms part of the Museum of Lancashire Textiles Industry. The Mill is quite unique as it still contains its own working steam engine which powers original looms by intact drive systems. The mill was built and run by a village co‐operative and continued to operate until 1982. Recognised for its historic importance the site was bought by Burnley Borough Council, and when faced with later financial uncertainty taken over by Lancashire County Council in 1997. Set beside its mill lodge on the edge of open countryside the complex typifies the Lancashire Cotton Industry of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The site contains a Scheduled Ancient Monument, Queen Street Mill Engine, which is currently being rescheduled under English Heritage’s revision of the National Heritage List, List ID 1005085. The scheduled site consists of the engine and its house and boiler house and the flue and chimney. The buildings are listed, Grade 1. The site is within the Harle Syke Conservation Area. Listing Grade 1 List Entry Number: 1416482 Date First Listed: 23 Dec 2013 Chimney The Grade 1 listed chimney at Burnley Queen Street Mill Museum is circular in plan, constructed from red brickwork and is thirty five metres tall, four metres diameter at its base and tapers to just over two metres at the top. -
Historic 1901 Steel Grain Elevator Faces Demolition
Volume 45 Fall 2016 Number 4 Historic 1901 Steel Grain Elevator Faces Demolition he 1901 Electric Steel Elevator (ESE) in in Minneapolis and Buffalo, were working to find a fireproof Minneapolis faces demolition if current preser- material to replace the all-wood terminal elevator. Steel, vation efforts fail to prevent it. tile, and concrete were fireproof, but more expensive than The ESE is nationally significant as one of wood. In Minneapolis, at least, the fireproof issue had more Tthe original all-steel grain elevators with free-standing, to do with insuring the grain in the elevator than with the cylindrical, grain tanks and a steel workhouse or headhouse. elevator itself. Only a city-certified fireproof elevator could It is the only survivor of three “classics of the steel era” avoid costly insurance rates. The ESE was the only new identified by Reyner Banham in his 1986 study, A Concrete elevator certified fireproof in Minneapolis in 1902. Atlantis. The others were the Electric Elevator in Buffalo, Claude Allen Porter (C.A.P.) Turner, an engineer bet- N.Y. (1897, razed 1984), and the Pioneer Steel Elevator ter known for his later innovations in reinforced concrete, in Minneapolis (1900, razed 1995; visited during the 1983 designed the elevator to take advantage of fireproof steel SIA Annual Conference). construction. He approached the design holistically, work- At the turn of 20th century, elevator builders, especially ing not only with a lighter, stronger, steel-tank design, but (continued on page 2) In This Issue: • Call for Nominations—SIA Officers 2017 • 2017 SIA Annual Conference, Houston, May 18–21 ❍ Call for Papers ❍ Tour Previews ❍ Student Scholarships ❍ General Tools Award Nominations • Welcome Steven Walton, SIA’s new Exec. -
Lancashire Historic Town Survey Programme
LANCASHIRE HISTORIC TOWN SURVEY PROGRAMME BURNLEY HISTORIC TOWN ASSESSMENT REPORT MAY 2005 Lancashire County Council and Egerton Lea Consultancy with the support of English Heritage and Burnley Borough Council Lancashire Historic Town Survey Burnley The Lancashire Historic Town Survey Programme was carried out between 2000 and 2006 by Lancashire County Council and Egerton Lea Consultancy with the support of English Heritage. This document has been prepared by Lesley Mitchell and Suzanne Hartley of the Lancashire County Archaeology Service, and is based on an original report written by Richard Newman and Caron Newman, who undertook the documentary research and field study. The illustrations were prepared and processed by Caron Newman, Lesley Mitchell, Suzanne Hartley, Nik Bruce and Peter Iles. Copyright © Lancashire County Council 2005 Contact: Lancashire County Archaeology Service Environment Directorate Lancashire County Council Guild House Cross Street Preston PR1 8RD Mapping in this volume is based upon the Ordnance Survey mapping with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Lancashire County Council Licence No. 100023320 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Lancashire County Council would like to acknowledge the advice and assistance provided by Graham Fairclough, Jennie Stopford, Andrew Davison, Roger Thomas, Judith Nelson and Darren Ratcliffe at English Heritage, Paul Mason, John Trippier, and all the staff at Lancashire County Council, in particular Nik Bruce, Jenny Hayward, Jo Clark, Peter Iles, Peter McCrone and Lynda Sutton. Egerton Lea Consultancy Ltd wishes to thank the staff of the Lancashire Record Office, particularly Sue Goodwin, for all their assistance during the course of this study. -
Burnley Patient Participation Network Meeting Minutes of the Meeting Held on Wednesday 20 March 2013 at 17:30-19:00
Burnley Patient Participation Network Meeting Minutes of the meeting held on Wednesday 20 March 2013 at 17:30-19:00 PRESENT: Practice Representing: Gordon Howley Chair Dianne Gardner Burnley Locality Manager Edwina Foote Richard Aslin Yorkshire St Joanne Jacques Rosegrove Lynn Lonsdale Burnley Wood Heather Mulley Parkside Walter Park St Nicholas Heather Hodson Oxford Road Anne Fittock Medicine Optimisation Lead, ELCCG Tricia Brindle Groundwork Pennine Lancs Min No: ACTION Apologies Apologies were received from Marina Buckley, Nora Myles, Malcolm Beck, Roger Creegan, Richard Twiddy, Mrs Cunningham, George Fort, Marilyn Hawke Welcome & Introductions Introductions were made around the table Minutes of the Last Meeting-5 December 2012 The minutes were agreed as a true record. 4. Matters Arising Expert Patient – Meeting held at Yorkshire St to discuss roll out. Agreed to promote dates of programmes across all Burnley Practices plus review if there is a shorter programme that could be implemented. Health Improvement Mapping – would benefit from a report being produced in easy read version. Once produced circulate report and members to take to PPGs. BPPN to meet in different practices – GH to investigate opportunities. Need to ensure minutes go to all practices. GH GH to attend a Practice Manager meeting to discuss. 5. Medicines Management Anne Fittock, Medicine Optimisation lead, was in attendance to answer member questions. All practices have medicine management input and they link into all Locality Steering Groups. Medicine Managers: 8 of the 17 Burnley practices have a medicine manager and there are issues around training and development of these posts. Other localities have agreed different ways of working to address the inequity across practices.