DOCSLIB.ORG

FEDERAL REGISTE 7 5 * ' 1934 NUMBER 154 VOLUME 8 ^ T/A F It E O ^

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FEDERAL REGISTE 7 5 * ' 1934 NUMBER 154 VOLUME 8 ^ T/A F It E O ^ ^ O N A M * . ^ 1 I ITTCOA'll FEDERAL REGISTE 7 5 * ' 1934 NUMBER 154 VOLUME 8 ^ t/A f iT E O ^ Washington, Thursday, August 5, 1943 Regulations the percentage that the simple average CONTENTS of the yields of sugar beets^in tons per acre planted on the farm in such year REGULATIONS AND NOTICES TITLE 7—AGRICULTURE or years is of the simple average of the Alien Property Custodian: . PaSe county average yields of sugar beets for Chapter VIII—War Food Administration Vesting orders: such year or years, except that the Abandoned patent applica­ normal yield for such farm shall not be P art 802—Sugar Determinations tions, nationals of: less than 80 percent nor more than 120 Enemy countries_________ 10911 NORMAL YIELDS OF COMMERCIALLY RECOVER­ percent of the county normal yield; and Enemy-occupied countries- 10911 ABLE SUGAR PER ACRE FOR SUGAR BEETS (in) For a farm on which sugar beets Avenarius, R., & Co-------------- 10913 (REVISED) were not planted in any of the next Bituminous Coal Division: Pursuant to the provisions of section preceding seven years, 90’ percent of the Minimum price schedules 303 of the Sugar Act of 1937, as.amended, county normal yield of sugar beets. amended: and Executive Order No. 9322, issued (3) The “county average yield” of , District 4_________________ 10885 March 26,1943, as amended by Executive sugar beets shall be: District 7 (2 documents)__ 10886, Order No. 9334, issued April 19, 1943, the (i) For each of the years 1936-1941, in­ 10888 following determination is hereby issued: clusive, the yield established, or which District 9_._______________ 10889 could have been established, under the District 14________ ,---------- 10891 § 802.15e Determination of normal 1942 sugar beet program; and Civil Aeronautics Board: yields of commercially recoverable sugar United Air Lines Transport per acre for sugar beets, (a) The nor­ (ii) For the year 1942 and any subse­ Corp., oral argument_____ 10910 mal yield of commercially recoverable quent year, for a county with ten or I nternal Revenue Bureau: sugar per acre for any farm on which more farms with respect to which ap­ Gift tax under Internal Rev­ sugar beets are planted shall be the plications for sugar payments were ap­ enue Code, regulations re­ amount of sugar obtained by multiplying proved, the weighted average yield in vised—_________________ 10858 the normal yield of sugar beets in tons tons per planted acre on such farms in Interstate Commerce Commission: per acre for the farm by the amount of such year, and for a county with less Daingerfield, Tex., weighing of sugar, raw value, determined to be com­ than ten farms with respect to which sand or gravel for use of mercially recoverable under section 302 applications for sugar payments were Austin Bridge Co---------- — 10910 (a) of the Sugar Act of 1937, as amended, approved, the yield per acre established Office of Defense T ransportation: by the State Agricultural Conservation Deliveries, wholesale and retail, from a ton of sugar beets of normal per­ further curtailment (ODT centage of sugar content for the farm. Committee on the basis of the yields per acre for such year in the county and in 17, Am. 5)_______________10910 (b) For the purposes of this deter­ Office of Price Administration: mination: . adjacent counties with similar produc­ Adjustment orders filed, list.— 10914 (1) “Planted” sugar beets shall be tion conditions. Adjustments, exceptions, etc.: deemed to include only sugar beets (4) The “county normal yield” of Bond, Lawrence E-------------- 10907 planted for harvest for the extraction of sugar beets shall be: Curtice Bros. Co----------------- 10908 sugar. (i) For a county for which county Parkinson, Warren Lee-------- 10907 (2) The “normal yield” of sugar beets average yields are established for Wells Mfg. Co______________10907 shall be: three or more of the next preceding Aluminum scrap and secondary (i) For a farm on which sugar beets seven years on the basis of ten or more ingot (MPR 2, Am. 2)____ 10899 were planted in three or more of the farms, the simple average of all the av­ Animal product feedingstuffs next preceding seven years, the simple erage yields in tons per acre so estab­ (RMPR 74, Am. D — ____ 10905 average of the annual average yields of lished for such county for such years; Asphalt, container costs (MPR sugar beets in tons per acre planted on and 188, Am. 10 to Order A-l) - 10915 the farm for all of such years in which (ii) For a county for which county Authority delegated to territo­ average yields are established for less rial director: sugar beets were planted; Puerto Rico_______________ 10917 (ii) For a farm on which sugar beets than three of the next preceding seven years on the basis of ten or more farms, Virgin Islands---------------------10917 were planted in only one or two of the Cotton goods, fine (MPR 11, next preceding seven years, the number the yield established by the State Agri­ cultural Conservation Committee on the Am. 8)_________________ 10900 of tons obtained by multiplying the (Continued on next page) county normal yield of sugar beets by (Continued on next page) 10855 10856 FEDERAL REGISTER, Thursday, A ugust 5, 1943 CONTENTS—Continued (5) The “normal percentage of sugar content” of sugar beets for a farm from Office of P rice Administration— which sugar beets were contracted to Continued. be marketed under that type of agree­ FEDERALSfcREGISTER Regional, State, and district of- rÜHuiQc- ment commonly known'as an “individual flee orders—Continued. Page test contract” shall be: Rubber footwear, victory line (i) In case sugar beets were so mar­ waterproof (MPR 229, Am. keted in three or more of the next pre­ Published daily, except Sundays, Mondays, 7 )-------------x--------------- 10900 ceding seven years, the simple average and days following legal holidays, by the Solid fuels: of the annual average percentages of Division of the Federal Register.-The National Archives, pursuant to the authority contained Clinton, Ind_____________ 10918 sugar content, at the time of delivery in the Federal Register Act, approved July 26, Mt. Vernon, Ind__________ 10917 to a processor, of the sugar beets mar­ 1935 (49 Stat 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C., Vanderburg County, Ind___ 10918 keted in all of such years in which sugar ch. 8B),.under regulations prescribed by the Sausages, frankfurters, etc., beets were so marketed; Administrative Committee, approved by the wholesale (MPR 389, Am. 5 (ii) In case sugar beets were so mar­ President. Distribution is made only by the and 6) (2 documents)___ 10906, keted in only one or two of the next pre­ Superintendent of Documents. Government , Printing Office, Washington,'D C. 10907 ceding seven years, the percentage of The regulatory material appearing herein is P etroleum Administration for sugar content obtained by multiplying keyed to the 'Code of Federal Regulations, War: the county normal percentage of sugar which is published, under 50 titles, pursuant Asphalt marketing, certain test content of sugar beets by the percentage to section 11 of the Federal Register Act, as amended June 19, 1937. requirements (Dir. 66, Am. that the simple average of the average The F ederal R egister will be furnished by 1) — ------; ----------------- 10908 percentages of sugar content, at the mail to subscribers, free of postage, for $1.50 Productive operations, elimina­ time of delivery to a processor, of the per month or $15.00 per year, payable in ad­ tion of certain Louisiana sugar beets marketed in such year or vance. The charge for individual copies fields (PAO 11, Am. D — _ 10908 years is of the simple average of the (minimum 15tf) varies in proportion to the Reclamation Bureau: size of the issue. Remit check or money county average percehtages of sugar con­ mac*e payable to the Superintendent Green Mountain Reservoir, tent of sugar beets for such year or OT Documents, directly to the Government Colo., boat and wharf privi­ years; and Printing Office. Washington. D. C. leges-------------------------- 10908 (iii) In case sugar beets were not so There are no restrictions on the republica- War F ood Administration: tion of material appearing in the F ederal marketed, in any of the next preceding Register. Meat quotas for August: (FDO 27-2, Am. 3) _________ 10857 seven years, the county normal per­ (FDO 61-2)--------------------- 10857 centage of sugar content of sugar beets. Sugar beets, normal yields of (6) The “county average percentage CONTENTS—Continued commercially recoverable of sugar content” of sugar beets shall be: (i) For each of the years 1936-41, in­ Office of P rice Administration— sugar per acre___________ 10855 Continued. Page War Production Board: clusive, the percentage established, or Cottonseed oil meal, cake, hulls, Aircraft, civilian (P4-7)______ 10898 which could have been established, under etc. (MPR 444)__________ 10903 Controlled materials plan (CMP the 1942 sugar beet program; and Malt beverages, domestic (MPR Reg. 1, Am. 2)________ 10898 (ii) For the year 1942 and any sub­ 259, Am. 2) ___ _________ . 10902 Dishwashers, commercial (L- sequent year, for a county with ten or Petroleum and products (RPS 248)----------------------------- 10896 more farms with respect to which appli­ 88, Am. 118)________ 10901 Paper and paperboard (M-241)_ 10898 cations for sugar payments were ap­ Plastic pipe and tubing (MPR Petroleum solvents, aromatic , proved, the weighted average percentage 188, Am. 18)___ 10807 (M-150)------------------ ----- 10894 of sugar content, at the time of delivery Modification of prices (MPR Reagent chemicals (P-135-a)__ 10896 to a processor, of all sugar beets mar­ 188, Am. 8 to Order A-l)_ 10914 Suspension orders: keted under individual test contracts in Puerto Rico, specific prices for Beck Engineering Combustion such year from farms in the county, certain canned goods Kompany------------------ 10894 and for a county with less than ten (RMPR 183, Am.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents Preface ..................................................................................................... ix Introductory Notes to Tables ................................................................. xi Chapter A: Selected Economic Statistics ............................................... 1 A1. Resident Population of the United States ............................................................................3 A2. Resident Population by State ..............................................................................................4 A3. Number of Households in the United States .......................................................................6 A4. Total Population by Age Group............................................................................................7 A5. Total Population by Age Group, Percentages .......................................................................8 A6. Civilian Labor Force by Employment Status .......................................................................9 A7. Gross Domestic Product, Net National Product, and National Income ...................................................................................................10 A8. Gross Domestic Product by Component ..........................................................................11 A9. State Gross Domestic Product...........................................................................................12 A10. Selected Economic Measures, Rates of Change...............................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Y NUMBER 200 * C H I N T O %
    REGIS VOLUME « 4*. 1934 ¿ y NUMBER 200 * C h i n t o % Washington, Tuesday, October 14, 1941 The President Planted in the Calendar Year 1941” are CONTENTS amended by adding the following para­ graph at the end of § 729.311 THE PRESIDENT MILITARY ORDER § 729.31 Prices of and payments of Military Order: Page By virtue of the authority vested in me excess peanuts for crushing into Kerr, Col. Francis B., assignment as President of the United States and as oil. * * * to assist Chairman and Ex­ Commander in Chief of the Army and Notwithstanding any other provision ecutive Director of Economic Navy of the United States, I hereby as­ of this Part VII, a designated agency Defense Board_____________ 6199 sign Colonel Francis R. Kerr, Army of may purchase quota peanuts at the es­ RULES, REGULATIONS, the United States, now on duty with the tablished price for excess peanuts for ORDERS Economic Defense Board, to assist the crushing into oil. (52 Stat. 38, as Chairman and Executive Director of said amended; 7 U.S.C., Sup., 1301 et seq.) T itle 7— A griculture: Board in the performance of certain Agricultural Adjustment Admin­ By virtue of the authority vested in the functions relating to the administration istration : Secretary of Agriculture by title III of of section 6 of Public No, 703, 76th Con­ Excess peanuts for crushing gress, Third Session, entitled “ An Act the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 (Public Law No. 430, 75th Congress, ap­ into oil, amendment____ 5199 To expedite the strengthening of the proved February 16, 1938; 52 Stat.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberal Construction of Tax Treaties an Analysis of Congressional and Administrative Limitations of an Old Doctrine Herrick K
    Cornell Law Review Volume 47 Article 2 Issue 4 Summer 1962 Liberal Construction of Tax Treaties An Analysis of Congressional and Administrative Limitations of an Old Doctrine Herrick K. Lidstone Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Herrick K. Lidstone, Liberal Construction of Tax Treaties An Analysis of Congressional and Administrative Limitations of an Old Doctrine , 47 Cornell L. Rev. 529 (1962) Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol47/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LIBERAL CONSTRUCTION OF TAX TREATIES-AN ANALYSIS OF CONGRESSIONAL AND ADMINI- STRATIVE LIMITATIONS OF AN OLD DOCTRINE Herrick K. Lidstonet Automatic data processing, identification numbers for taxpayers, with- holding of income tax from dividends and interest, and tax subsidies for investments in new equipment, revolutionary as they are in United States tax philosophy,' could normally have been expected to obscure the bitter infighting over those portions of H.R. 10650, the Revenue Bill of 1962, which prescribe new rules for taxation of foreign income.2 However, two years of publicizing the flow of gold toward Europe have so dramatized the possibilities for income tax avoidance (and even evasion) in foreign operations and through foreign bank accounts and tax havens that envious taxpayers can almost sympathize with Ingemar 'Johansson's failure to convince the district court that he was the fighting chattel of a Swiss corporation.3 From 1954 to 1961 the political battle was for freedom from income tax on foreign earnings.
    [Show full text]
  • Depreciation Policy: Whither Thou Goest
    SMU Law Review Volume 32 Issue 2 Article 1 1978 Depreciation Policy: Whither Thou Goest Henry J. Lischer Jr. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr Recommended Citation Henry J. Lischer, Depreciation Policy: Whither Thou Goest, 32 SW L.J. 545 (1978) https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr/vol32/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in SMU Law Review by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. DEPRECIATION POLICY: WHITHER THOU GOEST by Henry J. Lischer, Jr.* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. HISTORY OF DEPRECIATION .................................................. 546 A. Financial Accounting History ........................................ 547 B. United States Tax History Through 1968 .......................... 550 II. CONTEMPORARY DEPRECIATION ............................................. 563 A. Tax Shelters and the Tax Reform Act of 1969 ................... 563 B. ADR Depreciation and the Revenue Act of 1971 ................ 567 C. The Tax Reform Act of 1976 ......................................... 569 D. Theoretical Bases for Contemporary Depreciation ............. 571 E. Purposes of Contemporary Depreciation ......................... 573 III. MODIFICATION PROPOSALS ................................................... 573 A. Inflation Adjusted Depreciation ..................................... 573 B. Other Proposed Modifications to Depreciation .................
    [Show full text]
  • The Federal Excise Tax on Gasoline and the Highway Trust Fund: a Short History
    Order Code RL30304 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web The Federal Excise Tax on Gasoline and the Highway Trust Fund: A Short History Updated April 4, 2006 Pamela J. Jackson Analyst in Public Sector Economics Government and Finance Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress The Federal Excise Tax on Gasoline and the Highway Trust Fund: A Short History Summary Excise taxes have long been a part of our country’s revenue history. In the field of gasoline taxation, the states led the way with Oregon enacting the first tax on motor fuels in 1919. By 1932, all states and the District of Columbia had followed suit with tax rates that ranged between two and seven cents per gallon. The federal government first imposed its excise tax on gasoline at a one-cent per gallon rate in 1932. The gas tax was enacted to correct a federal budgetary imbalance. It continued to support general revenue during World War II and the Korean War. Economists know the gasoline excise tax as a “manufacturer’s excise tax” because the government imposes it at production (i.e., the producer, refiner, or importer) for efficiency in collection. Particularly in the short run, when the demand for gasoline is relatively inelastic, economists recognize any increase in the gasoline tax is generally passed forward to the retailer, translating into a higher retail gas sales price. Thus, the burden for much of the tax ultimately falls on the consumer. The Highway Revenue Act of 1956 established the federal Highway Trust Fund for the direct purpose of funding the construction of an interstate highway system, and aiding in the finance of primary, secondary, and urban routes.
    [Show full text]
  • Iii. the Excess Profits Tax of 1940
    19401 EXCESS PROFITS TAX labor records of potential contractors. 132 And where competitive bids are submitted, the Comptroller General has ruled that violations of the labor policies enunciated by the Defense Commission are sufficient grounds for rejecting the lowest bid.' 33 But whether social reforms will survive a direct conflict with industrial mobilization remains a question for the future. And other problems not con- templated by existing legislation and regulations will arise if the emergency long continues. Dislocations of the price system may require rigid controls. Provisions may be necessary to protect the financial and credit structure from the coming shock. Finally, the end of the emergency will bring prob- lems of demobilizing an abnormally accelerated and over-expanded produc- tion economy. !11.THE EXCESS PROFITS TAX OF 1940 A DEFENSE program requires money as well as machines and men. Although business can legitimately be expected to contribute its share through taxes, too heavy a burden will hinder the forces of production. Yet the morale of labor, consumers, and prospective draftees cannot be preserved if it is felt that a national emergency is being turned to private profit.1 In response to these diverse demands there has emerged the Excess Profits Tax Act of 1940.2 132. Comptroller General Dec., No. B-12733, Oct 9, 1940, (1940) 9 U. S. L. Wm 2237. 133. (1940) 9 U. S. L WzEic 2231. But compliance with the Act cannot be made a condition precedent to payment of contract price. Comptroller General Dec., No. B-10575, July 8, 1940, (1940) 9 U. S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Statutory Evolution of the Excess Profits Tax
    THE STATUTORY EVOLUTION OF THE EXCESS PROFITS TAX C. RUDOLF PETERSON* It is less than three years since Congress, following the example of World War I, enacted a general excess profits tax-the Excess Profits Tax Act of i94o. In the inter- vening period there has been one act, the Excess Profits Tax Amendments of 1941, devoted entirely to amendment of the original provisions; a second, the Revenue Act of 1941, which made further important amendments; and now recently a third, the Revenue Act of I942, which, of its 208 pages, contains 47 on the subject of excess profits-2o more than the original Act itself. Inter arma non silent leges. The 194o Act came as a result of the greatly accelerated defense effort which was one of the consequences of the German successes in the West in the spring of that year. On May 16, the President urged upon Congress the pressing necessity for increased defense expenditures.1 Congress responded immediately and, to assist in financing the additional appropriations, passed the Revenue Act of 194o (to be distinguished from the Second Revenue Act of i94o, Title II of which constituted the Excess Profits Tax Act of 1940). By this Act, individual surtax rates were in- creased, personal exemptions were reduced, corporate rates were raised by i%, and a defense tax of io% of the tax otherwise computed was imposed on all taxpayers, individuals and corporations alike, for a period of five years. This Act was approved June : 5th. The administration next turned its attention to the social consequences of the greatly increased expenditures to be made by the Government for war purposes, the major problem being the extent to which taxpayers should be permitted to make money out of the national emergency.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Excise Taxes: an Introduction and General Analysis
    Federal Excise Taxes: An Introduction and General Analysis August 26, 2013 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R43189 Federal Excise Taxes: An Introduction and General Analysis Summary There are four common types of excise taxes: (1) sumptuary (or “sin”) taxes, (2) regulatory or environmental taxes, (3) benefit-based taxes (or user charges), and (4) luxury taxes. Sumptuary taxes were traditionally imposed for moral reasons, but are currently rationalized, in part, to discourage a specific activity that is thought to have negative spillover effects (or “externalities”) on society. Regulatory or environmental taxes are imposed to offset external costs associated with regulating public safety or to discourage consumption of a specific commodity that is thought to have negative externalities on society. Benefit-based taxes (which include user charges) are imposed to charge users of a particular public good for financing and maintenance of that public good. Lastly, luxury taxes are primarily imposed as one way to raise revenue, particularly from higher-income households. This report provides an introduction and general analysis of excise taxes. First, a brief history of U.S. excise tax policy is provided. Second, the various forms of excise taxes and their respective administrative advantages and disadvantages are described. Third, the effect of federal excise taxes on federal, state, and local tax revenue is discussed. Fourth, the economic effects of various types of excise taxes are analyzed. The effects on consumer behavior and equity among taxpayers could be important issues for assessment of current excise tax policy or for the design of new excise taxes. Lastly, a list of references to other CRS reports on specific excise taxes is presented.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of the United States
    A Short History of the United States Robert V. Remini For Joan, Who has brought nothing but joy to my life Contents 1 Discovery and Settlement of the New World 1 2 Inde pendence and Nation Building 31 3 An Emerging Identity 63 4 The Jacksonian Era 95 5 The Dispute over Slavery, Secession, and the Civil War 127 6 Reconstruction and the Gilded Age 155 7 Manifest Destiny, Progressivism, War, and the Roaring Twenties 187 Photographic Insert 8 The Great Depression, the New Deal, and World War II 215 9 The Cold War and Civil Rights 245 10 Violence, Scandal, and the End of the Cold War 277 11 The Conservative Revolution 305 Reading List 337 Index 343 About the Author Other Books by Robert V. Remini Credits Cover Copyright About the Publisher 1 Discovery and Settlement of the New World here are many intriguing mysteries surrounding the peo- T pling and discovery of the western hemisphere. Who were the people to first inhabit the northern and southern continents? Why did they come? How did they get here? How long was their migration? A possible narrative suggests that the movement of ancient people to the New World began when they crossed a land bridge that once existed between what we today call Siberia and Alaska, a bridge that later dis- appeared because of glacial melting and is now covered by water and known as the Bering Strait. It is also possible that these early people were motivated by wanderlust or the need for a new source of food. Perhaps they were searching for a better climate, and maybe they came for religious reasons, to escape persecution or find a more congenial area to practice their partic u lar beliefs.
    [Show full text]
  • 1933 *I959 from the New Deal to the Cold War
    1933 *I959 From the New Deal to the Cold War I’he New Deal brought major changes to the Committee on Ways and Means. Legislative tarif€ rate-making was rep1 ments negotiated by the executive branch Agreements Act of 1934. The rity Act of 1935, creating the programs and greatly expanding government assistance to the needy. The income tax was extended through New Deal and World War I1 revenue legislation, becoming, along with Social Security, of life for most American citizens. For most tive coalition of Republicans and Southern committee, often frustrating the revenue Presidents Roosevelt and Truman. Even during the Republican admin- istration of Eisenhower, Cold War defense spending, the need to bal- mce the budget, and fears of inflation prevented any maj revenue reduction. “Our taxes must follow the he New Deal marked the beginning of the modern federal gov- intricacies of business and Ternment, and it refocused attention upon the Presidency due to not attempt to bend Franklin D. Roosevelt’s charisma and energy. The executive branch increased in size and complexity as the President centralized decision- business to the pattern of making. For example, the Bureau of the Budget was placed more simplicity we should all firmly under presidential control by its transfer from the Treasury De- like to see in laxation. ’’ partment to the Executive Offce of the President. The entire federal (Robert L. Doughton, bureaucracy expanded as Roosevelt’s Democratic administrations cre- 1940) ated program after program in an attempt to stimulate the economy. New agencies were created whose initials, such as the WPA, NRA, and CCC, were likened to alphabet soup, and the number of civilian gov- ernment employees in the capital doubled between 1929 and 1940.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 United States District Court for the Southern District of New York State of New York, State of Connecticut, State of Maryla
    Case 1:18-cv-06427 Document 1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 1 of 52 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, Civil Action No. 18-cv-6427 STATE OF MARYLAND, and STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY Plaintiffs, AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF v. JURY REQUESTED STEVEN T. MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Treasury; the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY; DAVID J. KAUTTER, in his official capacity as Acting Commissioner of the United States Internal Revenue Service; the UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants. INTRODUCTION 1. The States of New York, Connecticut, Maryland, and New Jersey (the “Plaintiff States”) bring this action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief to invalidate the new $10,000 cap on the federal tax deduction for state and local taxes (“SALT”). Congress has included a deduction for all or a significant portion of state and local taxes in every tax statute since the enactment of the first federal income tax in 1861. The new cap effectively eviscerates the SALT deduction, overturning more than 150 years of precedent by drastically curtailing the deduction’s 1 Case 1:18-cv-06427 Document 1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 2 of 52 scope. As the drafters of the Sixteenth Amendment1 and every subsequent Congress have understood, the SALT deduction is essential to prevent the federal tax power from interfering with the States’ sovereign authority to make their own choices about whether and how much to invest in their own residents, businesses, infrastructure, and more—authority that is guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment and foundational principles of federalism.
    [Show full text]
  • When We Taxed the Pyramids
    Florida State University Law Review Volume 41 Issue 1 Article 3 2013 When We Taxed the Pyramids Steven A. Bank [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Steven A. Bank, When We Taxed the Pyramids, 41 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 39 (2013) . https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr/vol41/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida State University Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW WHEN WE TAXED THE PYRAMIDS Steven A. Bank VOLUME 41 FALL 2013 NUMBER 1 Recommended citation: Steven A. Bank, When We Taxed the Pyramids, 41 FLA. ST. U. L. REV. 39 (2013). WHEN WE TAXED THE PYRAMIDS STEVEN A. BANK∗ I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 39 II. ORIGINS ............................................................................................................ 42 A. 1909 ............................................................................................................ 42 B. 1913–1921 .................................................................................................. 45 C. 1921–1934 .................................................................................................. 48 D. 1935–1936 .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]