©2010 by Suzanne Marie Lynch. All Rights Reserved
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository ©2010 BY Suzanne Marie Lynch. All rights reserved. FROM EXILE TO TRANSCENDENCE: RACIAL MIXTURE AND THE JOURNEY OF REVISION IN THE WORKS OF LYDIA MARIA CHILD, HANNAH CRAFTS, KATE CHOPIN, JAMES WELDON JOHNSON, AND JEAN TOOMER BY SUZANNE MARIE LYNCH DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2010 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Stephanie Foote, Chair Associate Professor Alice Deck, Co-Chair Associate Professor Siobhan Somerville Professor Cary Nelson Abstract My study, entitled From Exiles to Transcendences focuses on five authors: Lydia Maria Child, Hannah Crafts, Kate Chopin, James Weldon Johnson, and Jean Toomer. It examines each author’s effort to represent the mixed-race character as a constant “process of becoming” (Hall, Questions of Identity 4). This study aims to convey the distinctiveness of the American mixed-race character in American literature and to provide a thorough reading of how this distinctiveness is portrayed and sustained throughout the scope of the selected texts. My dissertation identifies the mixed-race voice as experientially distinct from other American raced voices while acknowledging the mixed-race character as one who demonstrates a connectedness to a plurality of racial cultures. The following chapters span a period of approximately 100 years and illustrate a common concern among them, albeit from differing perspectives and influences, regarding how home and family function as fluid spaces of racial subjectivity. My study maintains a position that the above authors questioned the presumed irreversibility of an entrenched understanding of family ties; that they challenged and rescripted the historically defined self with a self that privileges experience and discovery over pre-given identities; and that they depicted their characters as evolving subjects who created themselves with name and identity as they moved toward their “process of becoming.” ii To my Mother with love and to all those who live on the thresholds of neither/nor iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks to my best friend Robert Funk whose emotional support helped get me through the many challenges I faced during the writing of this project. Thanks to my mother who made sure I never lost sight of my goals and to whom I owe so much more than this simple dedication can provide; and thanks to my advisors for their guidance and patience. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction: 1 Chapter 1: Exiles and Revisions: Lydia Maria Child’s “Alternative” Republic 37 Chapter 2: Defining Hannah Crafts through the Reversals of Language, Womanhood, and Reason 75 Chapter 3: Disinheriting Whiteness in Chopin’s “Désirée’s Baby” 107 Chapter 4: “The Thrill of Discovery” Told Through the Borderland Voice of James Weldon Johnson’s Ex-Colored Man 135 Chapter 5: Consciousness of “Being” in Jean Toomer’s Poetry 174 Works Cited: 206 Biography: 222 v Introduction Although the mixed-race character has garnered much attention in the last two decades, my dissertation argues that this attention has been limited in scope. While serious consideration has been given to recognizing race as a construction of economics and/or as an identity category that is much more fluid than it is stable, I argue that much of this emphasis does not go far enough to make clear the distinctiveness of the mixed-race character as an American icon. But more importantly, I argue that the lack of attention to the manner in which this distinctiveness is portrayed and sustained though individual texts, more often than not eclipses the effort of some reformist authors who use these characters to suggest new ways of thinking about race. My dissertation thus illustrates how the mark of difference for mixed-race characters, which often comes in the form of an invisible racial sign or as uncommon racial experiences, becomes its own specific challenge for these characters who occupy a world where identity and racial history are inextricably intertwined. In an effort to demonstrate how an agenda of racially-mixed characters differs from that of the unmixed and to interpret the significance of this difference as it relates to the study of race in American literature, my project examines the work of five writers. These writers I argue look at the interconnection of cultures and races as an act that holds the potential to transform and refigure the construction of families and identities through a lens of character self-conception. My analysis of these authors’ texts concludes that the efforts of these writers to 1 acknowledge America’s racial diversity might be seen as their way of envisioning a new American culture that grants racially plural subjects an element of power and agency while simultaneously illustrating the possibilities of restructuring the social fabric of America that positions mixed-race subjects as inferior and dangerous. In contrast to Judith Berzon’s theory that characterizes these characters as singular subjects who experience a racial awareness that often comes through a signifying moment of realization,1 I approach these subjects as fluid and evolving constructions. Rather than viewing them as static identities that so easily lend themselves to readings that depict mixed-race characters as subjects cataclysmically vulnerable to the occurrence of change, I see these characters as subjects who illustrate change as a constant “process of becoming” (Hall, Questions 4), or as Kathleen Pfeiffer argues, as subjects who engage in racial and cultural diversity from the experience of “individuation.”2 Throughout the following chapters, I argue that this “process of becoming” and/or “individuation” is specifically useful in characterizing the experiences and constructedness of the mixed-race character. It is this approach to “becoming” that I rely on in my interrogation of the scholarship of this character who I contend has traditionally and restrictively been subsumed in 1 Judith Berzon, who draws heavily on the work of Everett Stonequist in her ground-breaking book Neither Black Nor White: The Mulatto Character (1978), states “virtually all fictional characters who undergo “the crisis experience” also undergo a profound social and psychological change in their lives” (120). In referring to the mixed-race character, she goes on to say that this experience includes the character’s “discovery that he belongs to a despised minority and that his identity and place within the lower caste are problematic.” 2 Pfeiffer explains this concept as a liberation from racial restrictions and an act of “self- actualization.” 2 the culture of blackness by various scholars who more often than not chose to read these characters as “crisis” characters (Berzon 122).3 I offer instead that if we view these characters as the cross-racial/cross-cultural/cross-experiential characters who defy racial expectations and embrace plurality, we might come to understand how they might function to provide a substantive counter discourse to those discourses that Julie Cary Nerad identify as “reinforcing biological definitions of race” (817) despite the effort by scholars to “destabilize the idea [of race] as a biological and authentic identity” (817). My work, which is heavily indebted to theorists such as Paul Gilroy, who argues for a “renewed critique of race thinking” (8) and Stuart Hall, who advances the idea that we are always in the “process of becoming” (“Cinematic Representations” 70), seeks specifically to explore the distinctiveness of the mixed- race character as illustrated by their authors. My goal is to bring visibility to characters of racial mixture by reclaiming them from their submersion in the races of others, a position that I claim has contributed to the overlooking of their authors’ unique contribution to American history and literature. The static, one-dimensional view of these characters as racial betrayers, which is so common to their reading,4 implicitly obscures the existence of the positive and substantive contributions their 3 Berzon makes the claim that the mixed-race character almost always experiences an “existential crisis of redefining himself” (122) and it is this “trauma” that provides the basis for his reconstituted identity. 4 For examples of these readings, see Robert Stepto’s discussion of Johnson’s Autobiography, George Hutchinson’s discussion of how Toomer and his work has been characterized in “Jean Toomer and the American racial Discourse,” and Barbara Christian’s discussion of the near white character in Black Women Novelists. 3 authors attempted to voice about the means by which their characters “rescue liberty” from an oppressive system (Child Romance 424). I argue that the mixed- race character, much like the early “literary domestics” of whom Mary Kelley states that “historians and critics have not known how to either characterize them or place them properly in history” (ix), falls subject to a similar treatment of “effacement.” Through a discussion of selected texts by Lydia Maria Child, Hannah Crafts, Kate Chopin, James Weldon Johnson, and Jean Toomer, I demonstrate how the work of these writers might be read as a type of platform for a revised discourse about race during a time when the Civil War and Reconstructive aftermath led to contentious racial debates, which often found their foothold in the discourses of religion and science. My dissertation approaches these writers as social reformers (or, more accurately, in the case of Chopin, social reporters) who use their characters to argue in favor of a personal racial agency free of historical confinements. In other words, my dissertation takes the position that the works of these selected authors represent a section of voices that examine and argue in favor of the idea of operating outside and beyond established racial paradigms.