DOCSLIB.ORG

Consolidated Plan 2011-2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Consolidated Plan 2011-2015 Cities of Dayton and Kettering FY 2011-2015 Strategic Plan Table of Contents Page FY 2011‐2015 Strategic Plan GENERAL Executive Summary 1 Managing the Process 11 Citizen Participation 18 HOUSING AND HOMELESS NEEDS Housing Needs 23 Homeless Needs 37 Non‐Homeless Special Needs 40 Lead‐Based Paint 43 HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS Housing Market Analysis 46 Public and Assisted Housing 55 Homeless Inventory 64 Special Needs Facilities and Services 66 Barriers to Affordable Housing 67 STRATEGIC PLAN General Priority Needs Analysis and Strategies 70 Specific Objectives 86 HOUSING STRATEGY Priority Housing Needs 88 Specific Objectives/Affordable Housing 93 Public Housing Strategy 97 HOMELESS STRATEGY Priority Homeless Needs 103 Homeless Strategy 106 Specific Objectives/Homelessness 111 NON‐HOMELESS SPECIAL NEEDS STRATEGY Priority Non‐Homeless Needs 112 Specific Special Needs Objectives 114 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Priority Community Development Needs 115 Specific Community Development Objectives 117 Barriers to Affordable Housing Strategy 119 Lead‐Based Paint Strategy 120 Antipoverty Strategy 121 Institutional Structure 124 Coordination 127 Monitoring 132 OTHER NARRATIVES AND ATTACHMENTS Additional Narrative 135 Appendices A Evidence of Citizen Participation Public Notice and Sample Public Hearing Invitation Public Hearing Sign‐in Sheet and Minutes Summary of Citizen Comments B Evidence of Agency Consultation Sample Stakeholder Survey Notification Letters sent to Nearby Municipalities C HUD Charts and Tables Housing Market Analysis Table 1A – CoC Homeless Population and Subpopulation Table 2A – Housing Needs Chart Table 2C – Summary of Specific Annual Objectives Table 1B – Non‐Homeless Special Needs Table 2B – Housing and Community Development Activities D Resolution Authorizing Submission of Strategic Plan Five-Year Strategic Plan This document includes Narrative Responses to specific questions to which grantees of the Community Development Block Grant, HOME Investment Partnership, Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS and Emergency Shelter Grants Programs must respond in order to be compliant with the Consolidated Planning Regulations. Name of Jurisdiction: Cities of Dayton and Kettering, Ohio CP Time Period: 2011 - 2015 GENERAL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Executive Summary is required and must include the objectives and outcomes Identified in the plan and an evaluation of past performance. Purpose of the Consolidated Plan The cities of Dayton and Kettering receive funding annually from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development under the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnership and Emergency Shelter Grants (ESG) programs. One of the requirements for receiving these funds is the development of a five‐year Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development (CP) to provide policy direction for the next five years of funding decisions. In general, the CP is guided by three overarching goals that are applied according to a community’s needs. The goals are: To provide decent housing by preserving the affordable housing stock, increasing the availability of affordable housing, reducing discriminatory barriers, increasing the supply of supportive housing for those with special needs and transitioning homeless persons and families into housing. FIVE-YEAR HUD STRATEGIC PLAN 1 2010 CPMP CITIES OF DAYTON AND KETTERING To provide a suitable living environment through safer, more livable neighborhoods, greater integration of low and moderate income residents throughout the cities, increased housing opportunities and reinvestment in deteriorating neighborhoods. To expand economic opportunities through more jobs paying self‐sufficient wages, homeownership opportunities, development activities that promote long‐term community viability and the empowerment of low‐ and moderate‐income persons to achieve self‐sufficiency. This CP corresponds to the next five fiscal years, which begin January 1, 2011, and end December 31, 2015. The primary federal funding resources in the 2011‐2015 Consolidated Plan are the following: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG): The primary objective of this program is to develop viable urban communities by providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and economic opportunities, principally for persons of low and moderate income levels. Funds can be used for a wide array of activities, including: housing rehabilitation, homeownership assistance, lead‐based paint detection and removal, construction or rehabilitation of public facilities and infrastructure, removal of architectural barriers, public services, rehabilitation of commercial or industrial buildings and loans or grants to businesses. HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME): The HOME program provides federal funds for the development and rehabilitation of affordable rental and ownership housing for low and moderate income households. HOME funds can be used for activities that promote affordable rental housing and homeownership by low and moderate income households, including reconstruction, moderate or substantial rehabilitation, homebuyer assistance and tenant‐based rental assistance. The Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) program provides federal funds for basic shelter and essential supportive services for homeless persons. ESG funds can be used for shelter facility operating costs and grant administration, as well as short‐term homeless prevention assistance to persons at imminent risk of losing their own housing due to eviction, foreclosure or utility shutoffs. Focus of the Plan As required by the federal government, the identification of needs and the adoption of strategies to address those needs must focus primarily on low‐ and moderate‐income (LMI) individuals and households. The CP must also address the needs of persons with “special needs” such as the elderly, persons with disabilities, large families, single parents, homeless individuals and families and public housing residents. The CP identifies housing, homeless, community and economic development needs and resources, while providing a strategic plan to address those needs in accordance with community priorities. FIVE-YEAR HUD STRATEGIC PLAN 2 2010 CPMP CITIES OF DAYTON AND KETTERING The cities have elected to apply the strategic framework of comprehensive plans and other published local plans in directing the activities funded by federal entitlements during the next five years. As a result, this CP will serve to implement the policy objectives established in CitiPlan 20/20, the Kettering Comprehensive Plan and a variety of other planning documents. Citizen Participation and Agency Consultation The cities of Dayton and Kettering made the decision to encourage a high level of agency consultation in an effort to demonstrate a commitment to (a) identifying priority needs and (b) engaging the participation of public agencies and non‐profit organizations in a productive and collaborative manner. A list of stakeholders was developed to include public agencies and private non‐profit organizations whose missions focus on the provision of affordable housing and human services to LMI households and persons. These stakeholders were invited to participate in a series of focus group sessions. Additionally, public and private agencies which were identified as stakeholders in the process were asked to complete written questionnaires to provide data on special needs populations such as the elderly, youth, persons with HIV/AIDS, public housing residents, persons with disabilities and the homeless. The series of opportunities for public engagement is detailed in full in the Citizen Participation section of the CP. In addition to being invited to attend town hall meetings and submit written comments on the draft CP, citizens were encouraged to become engaged via an online resident survey designed specifically for this purpose. The 51‐question Housing and Community Development Needs Survey was available online for about five weeks in April and May. Direct links were posted on the websites of both the City of Dayton and the City of Kettering. During this period, nearly 300 responses were received. Priority Needs and Strategies Dayton and Kettering are committed to allocating funds that serve the needs of the lowest‐ income and most disadvantaged residents. Households with incomes less than 80% of the area median income, particularly those with extremely low incomes (less than 30% of area median income), are particular priorities. The cities have also identified special needs individuals as among those who face the greatest challenges and who should receive high priority in the expenditure of federal funds, including at‐risk youth, low income families, the homeless and persons threatened with homelessness, the elderly, and persons with disabilities. The following needs address this priority: The provision and maintenance of affordable housing Investment in community development activities in lower‐income and deteriorating neighborhoods and in facilities that serve lower‐income populations, and Supportive services to maintain independence. FIVE-YEAR HUD STRATEGIC PLAN 3 2010 CPMP CITIES OF DAYTON AND KETTERING By focusing on these needs, the cities seek to address community concerns such as: A need for suitable affordable housing to address the growing gap between housing costs and local incomes, which leads to rising rates of overcrowding, and overpayment for the lowest‐income residents Programs that improve community facilities and services, particularly
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WALGREENS 183 E Dayton Yellow Springs Road Fairborn, OH 45324 TABLE of CONTENTS
    NET LEASE INVESTMENT OFFERING WALGREENS 183 E Dayton Yellow Springs Road Fairborn, OH 45324 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Profile II. Location Overview III. Market & Tenant Overview Executive Summary Photographs Demographic Report Investment Highlights Aerial Market Overview Property Overview Site Plan Tenant Overview Map NET LEASE INVESTMENT OFFERING DISCLAIMER STATEMENT DISCLAIMER The information contained in the following Offering Memorandum is proprietary and strictly confidential. STATEMENT: It is intended to be reviewed only by the party receiving it from The Boulder Group and should not be made available to any other person or entity without the written consent of The Boulder Group. This Offering Memorandum has been prepared to provide summary, unverified information to prospective purchasers, and to establish only a preliminary level of interest in the subject property. The information contained herein is not a substitute for a thorough due diligence investigation. The Boulder Group has not made any investigation, and makes no warranty or representation. The information contained in this Offering Memorandum has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable; however, The Boulder Group has not verified, and will not verify, any of the information contained herein, nor has The Boulder Group conducted any investigation regarding these matters and makes no warranty or representation whatsoever regarding the accuracy or completeness of the information provided. All potential buyers must take appropriate measures to verify all of the information set forth herein. NET LEASE INVESTMENT OFFERING EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE The Boulder Group is pleased to exclusively market for sale a single tenant net leased Walgreens property located SUMMARY: in Fairborn, Ohio.
    [Show full text]
  • Reader Spread
    2006 PROGRESS REPORT ON COMMUNITY OUTCOMES, INDICATORS AND STRATEGIES MONTGOMERY COUNTY FAMILY AND CHILDREN FIRST COUNCIL Table of Contents Letter from the Chair 1 POSITIVE LIVING FOR Strategic Community Initiatives 70 SPECIAL POPULATIONS Results-Based Accountability: 2 Positive Living for Special 36 Community-Based Projects The FCFC’s Use of Outcomes Populations Outcome Team Report Inter-Agency Collaboration 72 and Indicators Help Me Grow 40 Child Fatality Review 73 Nursing Home Population 42 Calendar Art Contest 74 HEALTHY PEOPLE Healthy People Outcome 4 People with Developmental 43 Brother Raymond L. Fitz, 75 Team Report Disabilities Competitively Employed S.M., Ph.D. Award Low Birth Weight 7 People with Developmental 44 Funding Activities and Review Disabilities Working in Enclaves Premature Mortality 8 Supported Services 76 Day-to-Day Living for 45 9 Childhood Immunizations Mentally Ill Adults Dayton Development 76 10 Coalition Review Process Access to Health Care Level of Functioning for 46 Behind the Numbers: Mentally Ill Youth Family and Children First Council 77 Access to Health Care 11 Successful Substance Abuse 47 State Duties Treatment Family and Children 78 First Council Roster YOUNG PEOPLE SUCCEEDING Behind the Numbers: 48 Young People Succeeding 13 Level of Functioning for Staff and Additional Support 79 Outcome Team Report Mentally Ill Youth 2006 Honors and Accomplishments 80 Mentoring Collaborative 16 Sinclair Fast Forward Center 17 SAFE AND SUPPORTIVE Data Sources 81 Teen Pregnancy Prevention 17 NEIGHBORHOODS Safe Neighborhoods
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Exports 2009 Origin of Movement Series
    Policy Research and Strategic Planning Office A State Affiliate of the U.S. Census Bureau Ohio Exports 2009 Origin of Movement Series March 2010 Ted Strickland, Governor of Ohio Lee Fisher, Lt. Governor of Ohio Lisa Patt-McDaniel, Director Ohio Exports 2009 Origin of Movement Series March 2010 B000 Ed Simmons, Analyst Policy Research and Strategic Planning, Ohio Department of Development P.O. Box 1001, Columbus, Ohio 43216-1001 Telephone (614) 466-2116 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Executive Summary. .…………………………………………………… 3 Table: Top Ranking Exports …………………………………………… 5 Export-Related Employment, 2008 …………………………………………… 6 Revisions …….……………………………………………………………….. 7 Profile: Ohio Exports ………..…………….………………………….… 9 Table: Ohio Exports to Selected Destinations, 2007 - 2009………… 10 Map: Ohio Exports by Region of the World …………………………… 11 Table: Ohio's Top Exports with State Rank …………………...……… 12 Overview: Size, Growth, and Concentration…………………………… 13 Chart: Ohio's Ten Largest Exports: Size, Growth, Concentration …… 14 Table: Products Sorted by Concentration and Growth………………… 15 Metropolitan Area Exports, 2007 ……………………………………….. 16 PROFILES Country Profiles: Top 20 Export Destinations………………………….. 17-36 OHIO DATA Ohio Exports by Country: Ranked by 2009 Value …………………….. 37-41 Ohio Exports by Product: Ranked by 2009 Value …………………….. 43-44 Four-Digit Breakdown of Top 6 Exported Products, 2007 - 2009…….. 45-51 U.S. DATA U.S. Exports by State: Ranked by 2009 Value …………………………. 53 U.S. Exports by Country: Ranked by 2009 Value ………………………. 54-58 U.S. Exports by Product: Ranked by 2009 Value ………………………. 59-69 DATA DEFINITIONS & LIMITATIONS Guide to State Export Data ………………………………………………. 61-62 APPENDIX Ohio Exports by Product (NAICS): Ranked by 2009 Value ……………… 63 1 QUICK FACTS 2 Ohio Exports 2009 Executive Summary Ohio merchandise exports were valued at $34.1 billion in 2009, a decrease of 25.3 percent from 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT of OHIO WESTERN DIVISION PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION C/O Gerhardste
    Case: 1:15-cv-00568-MRB Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/01/15 Page: 1 of 27 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION PLANNED PARENTHOOD : Case No. 1:15-cv-568 SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION : C/O Gerhardstein & Branch, LPA : 432 Walnut Street, Suite 400 : Judge Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 : : WOMEN’S MED GROUP : PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION : C/O Gerhardstein & Branch, LPA : 432 Walnut Street, Suite 400 : COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 : AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF : Plaintiffs, : PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION vs. : REQUESTED : RICHARD HODGES : 246 N. High Street : Columbus, Oh 43215 : In his official capacity as the Director of the : Ohio Department of Health : : and : : UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI : MEDICAL CENTER, LLC : 3200 Burnet Avenue : Cincinnati, OH 45229 : : and : : UC HEALTH : C/O AGENT:GH&R Business : Services, Inc. : 511 Walnut Street 1900 5/3 Center : Cincinnati, OH 45202 : : Defendants. : Case: 1:15-cv-00568-MRB Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/01/15 Page: 2 of 27 PAGEID #: 2 I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1. This civil rights case pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 challenges Ohio’s continuing assault on the right of women to exercise reproductive freedom and its efforts to shutter the last two ambulatory surgery facilities that perform abortions in Southwest Ohio. If both facilities must shut their doors, abortion services in Southwest Ohio will be virtually eliminated overnight. 2. Such efforts are part of a deliberate strategy to severely reduce access to abortion by imposing and enforcing laws and regulations that do not promote women’s health or any other valid state interest. At the beginning of 2013, there were 14 clinics in Ohio providing surgical abortion.
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Findings
    Architectural Findings Summary of Architectural Trends 1940‐70 National architectural trends are evident within the survey area. The breakdown of mid‐20th‐ century styles and building types in the Architectural Findings section gives more detail about the Dayton metropolitan area’s built environment and its place within national architectural developments. In American Architecture: An Illustrated Encyclopedia, Cyril Harris defines Modern architecture as “A loosely applied term, used since the late 19th century, for buildings, in any of number of styles, in which emphasis in design is placed on functionalism, rationalism, and up‐to‐date methods of construction; in contrast with architectural styles based on historical precedents and traditional ways of building. Often includes Art Deco, Art Moderne, Bauhaus, Contemporary style, International Style, Organic architecture, and Streamline Moderne.” (Harris 217) The debate over traditional styles versus those without historic precedent had been occurring within the architectural community since the late 19th century when Louis Sullivan declared that form should follow function and Frank Lloyd Wright argued for a purely American expression of design that eschewed European influence. In 1940, as America was about to enter the middle decades of the 20th century, architects battled over the merits of traditional versus modern design. Both the traditional Period Revival, or conservative styles, and the early 20th‐century Modern styles lingered into the 1940s. Period revival styles, popular for decades, could still be found on commercial, governmental, institutional, and residential buildings. Among these styles were the Colonial Revival and its multiple variations, the Tudor Revival, and the Neo‐Classical Revival. As the century progressed, the Colonial Revival in particular would remain popular, used as ornament for Cape Cod and Ranch houses, apartment buildings, and commercial buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Dayton, Ohio Splashing It Up!
    City of Dayton, Ohio Splashing it up! Comprehensive Annual Financial Report January 1, 2007 • December 31, 2007 LEFT TO RIGHT Rhine McLin, Mayor Dean Lovelace, Commissioner Joey D. Williams, Commissioner Matt Joseph, Commissioner Nan Whaley, Commissioner Rashad M. Young, City Manager City of Dayton, Ohio Splashing it up! INTRODUCTORY Splashing it up! it Splashing City of Dayton, Ohio Dayton, of City CITY OF DAYTON, OHIO COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007 Table of Contents (Continued) Combining Statements and Individual Fund Schedules: Combining Statements - Nonmajor Governmental Funds Fund Descriptions . F 101 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual (Non-GAAP Budgetary Basis) - General Fund . .F 102 Combining Balance Sheet - Nonmajor Governmental Funds . F 104 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Nonmajor Governmental Funds . F 105 Combining Balance Sheet - Nonmajor Special Revenue Funds . .F 106-107 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Nonmajor Special Revenue Funds . F 108-109 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual (Non-GAAP Budgetary Basis) - Street Fund. .F 110 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual (Non-GAAP Budgetary Basis) – Highway Maintenance Fund. .F 111 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual (Non-GAAP Budgetary Basis) – Special Projects Fund. F 112 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance -Budget and Actual (Non-GAAP Budgetary Basis) - Miscellaneous Grants Fund. F 113 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual (Non-GAAP Budgetary Basis) - Debt Service Fund .
    [Show full text]
  • Division of Air Pollution Control Response to Comments Interested
    Division of Air Pollution Control Response to Comments Interested Party Draft Rule Language Comment Period Rule: OAC Chapter 3745-72 Low Reid Vapor Pressure Fuel Requirements Agency Contact for this Package Division Contact: Alan Harness, DAPC, 644-4838, [email protected] Ohio EPA provided a 30 day comment period which ended on March 6, 2015. This document summarizes the comments and questions received at the public hearing and/or during the associated comment period. Ohio EPA reviewed and considered all comments received during the public comment period. By law, Ohio EPA has authority to consider specific issues related to protection of the environment and public health. In an effort to help you review this document, the questions are grouped by topic and organized in a consistent format. The name of the commenter follows the comment in parentheses. General Comments Comment 1 I suggest reinstating the Ohio E-Check program. The program was eliminated in seven Ohio counties once EPA air quality standards were found to be in compliance. To maintain better ambient air quality standards with low RVP's in Ohio and to further fund OEPA, I suggest reimplementing the E-Check emissions program. Such a plan would offset ODOT administrative complaints from air pollution concerns as well. (Mr. Scott Bushbaum, Sierra Club, Dayton, Ohio) Response 1 The RVP fuels program was initiated in the Cincinnati/Dayton metropolitan area in 2006 as a replacement for the Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program (also known as E-check) and was successful in helping the area achieve attainment of the federal 1997 8-hour ozone standard.
    [Show full text]
  • The NEXT MEETING Is April 1, 2021** CAUCUS REMINDER: the SELECTION of the EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVES WILL IMMEDIATELY FOLLOW THIS MEETING
    **MEETING LOCATION** Join Zoom Meeting: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87647642836 BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING March 4, 2021 9:00 AM AGENDA Est. Item Topic Page Time Presenter I. Introductions – Roll Call 9:00 C. Mucher II. Pledge of Allegiance – Please Mute all Microphones and Rise 9:02 C. Mucher * III. Approval of February 4, 2021 Meeting Minutes 1 9:03 C. Mucher IV. Public Comment Period on Action Items 9:04 C. Mucher V. RPC (REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION) ACTION ITEMS 9:05 C. Mucher A. Election of Officers 1. Report of Nominations Committee J. Dodge 2. Election of Officers VI. MPO (METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION) ACTION ITEMS * A. Recommended Adoption of Amendment to MVRPC’s 9 9:15 P. Arnold SFY2021-2024 Transportation Improvement Program * B. Recommendation for MVRPC Regional Controlled STP, 31 9:20 P. Arnold CMAQ and TA Funds VII. INFORMATION ITEMS *** A. Rideshare Program, Air Quality Awareness Program and 41 9:25 L. Henry Safety Campaign Update B. 2021 Transportation Review Advisory Council (TRAC) 9:40 B. Daniel Update ** VIII. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S REPORT 53 9:45 B. Martin IX. ADJOURNMENT 9:55 C. Mucher * Attachment **Handout ***Available on Committee Center Interpreters for hearing-impaired individuals are available upon request; requests should be made at least one week ahead. **The NEXT MEETING is April 1, 2021** CAUCUS REMINDER: THE SELECTION OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVES WILL IMMEDIATELY FOLLOW THIS MEETING. IF YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE YOUR 2021 DELEGATE FORM MUST BE ON FILE PRIOR TO THIS MEETING.
    [Show full text]
  • HUD PD&R Housing Market Profiles
    HUD PD&R Housing Market Profiles Dayton, Ohio Quick Facts About Dayton By Felipe Chacon | As of November 1, 2013 Current sales market conditions: soft. Current rental market conditions: soft. Overview Current apartment market conditions: Approximately 50 miles northeast of Cincinnati, on the Indiana slightly soft. border, the Dayton metropolitan area includes Greene, Miami, Tech Town, a 40-acre redevelopment project in Montgomery, and Preble Counties in Ohio. The metropolitan area downtown Dayton that focuses on attracting is home to several colleges and universities, including Wright State technology-based firms to the downtown area, University (WSU), the University of Dayton, and Sinclair Commu- has completed three buildings since 2000, cre- nity College. In addition, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (AFB) ating an estimated 320 new jobs among the 44 and the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park, where companies that lease space in the buildings. the Wright brothers researched and perfected their early aircraft designs, are in the metropolitan area. • As of November 1, 2013, the estimated population of the metro - politan area was 843,100, an increase of 430, or 0.1 percent, annually since April 1, 2010. • Net natural increase (resident births minus resident deaths) has accounted for all the population growth since April 2010, as net out-migration has averaged 1,125 people annually compared with an average net out-migration of 3,460 people annually dur - ing the 2000-to-2010 decade, when the population declined by 670, or
    [Show full text]
  • **Meeting Location** Dayton Area Board of Realtors 1515 S
    **MEETING LOCATION** DAYTON AREA BOARD OF REALTORS 1515 S. MAIN STREET, 2ND FLOOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING December 3, 2015 9:00 AM AGENDA Est. Item Topic Page Time Presenter I. Introductions 9:00 J. Vargo II. Pledge of Allegiance 9:02 J. Vargo * III. Approval of November 5, 2015 Meeting Minutes 1 9:03 J. Vargo IV. Public Comment Period on Action Items 9:04 J. Vargo V. MPO (METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION) ACTION ITEMS * A. Adoption of Amendment to MVRPC’s SFY2016-2019 4 9:05 P. Arnold Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) * B. Adoption of Proposed list of 2040 Long Range Transportation 21 9:10 A. Ramirez Plan Congestion Management Projects; Summary of Public P. Arnold Participation Meetings (October 20-22); and Financial Analysis VI. INFORMATION ITEMS * A. Proposed new projects requesting MVRPC’s STP and TA 55 9:20 P. Arnold Funds B. “Taking Care of What We Have - Transportation Asset 9:25 M. Parrill Management Plan (TAMP)” A.Fluegemann * C. Clarification on Vacancy - Unexpired Term in Office 68 9:40 B. Martin ** VII. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S REPORT 9:45 B. Martin VIII. ADJOURNMENT 9:50 J. Vargo * Attachment **Handout Interpreters for hearing-impaired individuals are available upon request; requests should be made at least one week ahead. MIAMI VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING NOVEMBER 5, 2015 MINUTES Members/Voting Alternates Mehdi Sharzi, Vectren Richard Barnhart, City of West Carrollton Regan Snider, Miami County Transit Doug Barry, Miami Township–Mont. Co. Woodrow Stroud, Greene County Transit Eric
    [Show full text]
  • Montgomery County NSP1 Plan
    Montgomery County, Ohio Mission Statement: To improve and maintain the quality of life and economic health of Montgomery County Neighborhood Stabilization Plan (NSP) Judy Dodge, Commissioner Dan Foley, Commissioner Substantial Action Plan Debbie Lieberman, Commissioner Deborah Feldman, Administrator Amendment 2008 451 West Third St, 10th Floor PO Box 972 Dayton, OH 45422 www.mcohio.org/ced Montgomery County 451 West Third St, 10th Floor PO Box 972 Dayton, OH 45422 www.mcohio.org/ced (937) 225-6318 Joe Tuss, Director Community & Economic Development Department Staff Judy Mott Manager [email protected] Tawana Jones Matt Dunn Community Development Specialist III Community Development Specialist II [email protected] [email protected] Kiya Patrick Verna Vance Community Development Specialist II Accountant [email protected] [email protected] NSP GRANT SUBMISSION TEMPLATE & CHECKLIST NSP grant allocations can be requested by submitting a paper NSP Substantial Amendment or a form under the Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting (DRGR) system. This template sets forth the suggested format for grantees under the NSP Program. A complete submission contains the information requested below, including: (1) The NSP Substantial Amendment (attached below) (2) Signed and Dated Certifications (attached below) (3) Signed and Dated SF-424. Grantees should also attach a completed NSP Substantial Amendment Checklist to ensure completeness and efficiency of review (attached below). THE NSP SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT Jurisdiction(s): Montgomery County, Ohio NSP Contact Person: Judy Mott Address: 451 W. Third Street, 10th Floor Jurisdiction Web Address: Dayton, OH 45402 • www.mcohio.org/ced Telephone: 937.225.6341; Fax: 937.496.6629 Email: [email protected] A. AREAS OF GREATEST NEED Provide summary needs data identifying the geographic areas of greatest need in the grantee’s jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • South Dayton Knights Football
    AlterKnightsFootballLogo.indd 2 Stronger6/22/2006 11:43:33 AM than ever 2015 Parent Handbook Alter Knights 2015 EXCALIBUR AWARD Recipients Back Row: Trevor Smith, Jauren Pryce, Matthew Zelinski Front Row: John Ruff, David Rueth Photos provided courtesy Stronger than ever of Easterling Studios ALTER KNIGHTS 2015 FOOTBALL CAPTAINS Back Row: John Ruff, Andy Turpin Front Row: Chris Beech, Conor Ryan, Nick Balent, Jacob Brinkman With “Alter Pride” from the ALTER FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION (AFA) Table of Contents Team Prayer 2 Head Coach’s Letter 3 AFA Lift-A-Thon Sponsors 4–5 Football Schedule 6 Game Directions 7 Varsity & Freshman Rosters 8 Football, Cheer & Student Aide Directory 9–11 Alter Bowl Champions 12 Special Contributors 12 Coaching Staff 13–19 South Dayton Knights Football 19 OHSAA Computer Rankings 20 Gridiron Greats 20 Excalibur Award Recipients 21 Knights of Old 22–23 Alter Knights Football Tribute 24–25 Varsity Football Record 26 Varsity Football Cumulative 27 Varsity Football Team Statistics 28 Varsity Football Individual Statistics 28–29 Varsity Football Individual Career Records 30 AFA Volunteers & Volunteers 31–32 About Alter High School Location 940 E. David Rd., Kettering, OH 45429 Founded 1962 Principal Mrs. Lourdes Lambert Mascot Knights School Phone (937)434-4434 Colors Brown & Gold Athletic Director Ms. Chris Hart AD Phone (937)428-5311 Archbishop Alter High School is a Catholic co-educational, accredited secondary school affiliated with the Archdiocese of Cincinnati and serving the southern Dayton metropolitan area. Alter focuses its curriculum at the college preparatory level, while meeting the needs of the non-college bound student. While emphasizing Christian justice, moral judgment and individual responsibility, Alter strives to produce students capable of evaluating, analyzing, and synthesizing material in a creative, yet logical manner.
    [Show full text]