X********************************************************* Reproductions Supplied by EDRS Are the Best That Can Be Made Frum the Original Document
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Section 8 - General Rural District
SECTION 8 - GENERAL RURAL DISTRICT SECTION 8 - GENERAL RURAL DISTRICT Subdivision 1. Purpose The purpose of the General Rural District is to provide locations for agriculture, agriculturally- related development, and housing on lots without public sewer or water services. All uses not listed as Permitted Uses, Conditional Use Permits or Interim Use Permits shall not be allowed within the General Rural Zoning District. Subdivision 2. Permitted Uses 1. Agricultural Uses 2. Communication Towers up to 200’ in height (see Section 16.5) 3. Daycare, Family 4. Docks, Temporary 5. Feedlots and/or Manure Storage Areas (Tier 1) meeting the requirements of Section 17, Subd 16 6. Grading, Filling or Excavating Temporary 7. Home Occupation 8. Motor Sport Facilities, Private 9. Private and/or Commercial Kennel (see Ordinance No 134) 10. Single-Family Housing 11. Windpower Management (Hobbyist) Sherburne County Zoning Ordinance Sec 8 General Rural District - 1 - Amended August 2020 SECTION 8 - GENERAL RURAL DISTRICT Subdivision 3. Conditional Uses Land in the General Rural District may be used for any of the following purposes upon the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit. Refer to Section 16 for a description of the requirements of each of these Conditional Uses. 1. Aircraft Landing Strip, Private 2. Airport, Public 3. Aquaculture 4. Cemeteries 5. Churches 6. Communication Towers up to 200’ in height (see Section 16.5) 7. Daycare, Commercial 8. Farm Related Business 9. Farm Related Bunkhouse for a Temporary Residence 10. Feedlots and/or Manure Storage Areas (Tier 2 – Tier 5) meeting the requirements of Section17, Subd 16 11. Game Refuge, Private 12. -
The State of Education in Alabama's K-12 Rural Public Schools
Rural Educator 32(2) Winter 2011 The State of Education in Alabama’s K-12 Rural Public Schools Ronald A. Lindahl Alabama State University The purpose of this study was to compare Alabama’s rural school districts with its city, suburban, and town districts. Descriptive statistics were used for this population study, with effect sizes calculated using Cohen’s d. Findings indicated Alabama’s rural school districts serve slightly less affluent student populations, with a lower percentage of minority students, than their counterparts. They are funded at slightly lower levels than their counterparts in other categories, yet spend approximately the same percentage of their budgets on administration and on instruction. They spend a considerably higher percentage on transportation. Although rural district dropout rates are similar to those of their counterparts, from the third to the eleventh grade, student performance on standardized examinations falls gradually behind that of the students in other locale categories. Keywords: Alabama schools; rural schools; student performance; school funding Alabama is among the 13 states where rural education is 3. To what extent does the socio-economic level of the most important to the overall educational performance of students the districts serve vary by the locale of the the state (Johnson & Strange, 2007, p. i), yet it is among district? the four states least conducive to rural educational 4. To what extent do per-pupil expenditures vary in achievement (p. ii). Clearly, rural education is one relation to the locale of the school district? aspect of the public educational system that merits 5. To what extent do the percentages of funds districts serious attention, particularly in Alabama. -
FY15 NCLB Nonpublic Allocation Tables
FY 2015 ESEA‐NCLB Nonpublic Allocations NONPUBLIC COUNTY DISTRICT SCHOOL TITLE II‐A TITLE III CODE COUNTY CODE DISTRICT NAME CODE NONPUBLIC SCHOOL NAME % TITLE III IMMIGRANT 01 ATLANTIC 0010 ABSECON CITY 01A HOLY SPIRIT HIGH SCHOOL 30.80% 01 ATLANTIC 0110 ATLANTIC CITY 03A OUR LADY STAR OF THE SEA 2.48% $2,554 01 ATLANTIC 0590 BUENA REGIONAL 04A SAINT AUGUSTINE PREP 23.80% 01 ATLANTIC 0590 BUENA REGIONAL 08A SAINT MARYS REGIONAL 8.13% $256 01 ATLANTIC 1310 EGG HARBOR TWP 09A ATLANTIC CHRISTIAN SCHOOL 3.63% 01 ATLANTIC 1690 GALLOWAY TWP 15A ASSUMPTION REGIONAL CATHOLIC SCHOOL 8.23% 01 ATLANTIC 1690 GALLOWAY TWP 17A CHAMPION BAPTIST ACADEMY 0.65% 01 ATLANTIC 1690 GALLOWAY TWP 16A HIGHLAND ACADEMY 0.98% 01 ATLANTIC 1690 GALLOWAY TWP 14A PILGRIM ACADEMY 7.50% 01 ATLANTIC 1940 HAMILTON TWP 18A SAINT VINCENT DEPAUL SCHOOL 5.02% $513 01 ATLANTIC 1960 HAMMONTON TOWN 21A LIFE MISSION TRAINING CENTER 0.22% 01 ATLANTIC 1960 HAMMONTON TOWN 20A SAINT JOSEPH HIGH SCHOOL 9.73% 01 ATLANTIC 1960 HAMMONTON TOWN 19A SAINT JOSEPH SCHOOL REGIONAL ELEM 6.83% 01 ATLANTIC 4180 PLEASANTVILLE CITY 02P LIFE POINT ACADEMY/ LIFE POINT CHUR 0.22% 01 ATLANTIC 4800 SOMERS POINT CITY 23A SAINT JOSEPH REGIONAL SCHOOL 32.10% 03 BERGEN 0300 BERGENFIELD BORO 24A TRANSFIGURATION ACADEMY 6.08% $2,814 03 BERGEN 0300 BERGENFIELD BORO 00X YESHIVAT HE'ATID 3.77% 03 BERGEN 0440 BOGOTA BORO 26A SAINT JOSEPH ACADEMY 19.50% 03 BERGEN 0440 BOGOTA BORO 27A TRINITY LUTHERAN SCHOOL 0.63% 03 BERGEN 0990 CRESSKILL BORO 29A ACADEMY OF ST. -
ZONING DISTRICTS 4-1 Land Development Code
CHAPTER 4 | ZONING DISTRICTS Chapter 4 * ZONING DISTRICTS §4.1 | Rural Zoning Districts The AF-35 and AFT Districts shall be known as Rural Zoning Districts. These districts are generally appropriate for application in the Rural Planning Area. The Zoning Districts Rural Districts Summary as described in Chapter 4 are general in nature and not District Name Density /Lot Size guarantees that the stated minimums or maximums can be AF-35 1 unit/35 acres achieved on every site. Other regulations of this Land Development Code or site-specific conditions may further limit AFT 1 unit/5-35 acres development. (See Section 6.3) 4.1.1 | AF-35, Agricultural and Forestry District The AF-35, Agricultural and Forestry District is primarily intended to provide for the protection and continuation of agriculture and forestry operations, and the preservation of environmentally sensitive lands. AF-35 Districts are intended for application in the Rural Planning Area. The district corresponds to and implements the Mesa County Master Plan’s “Rural/Agricultural 35+,” “Large Lot Rural/Agricultural 35+” and “Conservation” future land use classifications. 4.1.2 | AFT Agricultural, Forestry, Transitional District The AFT, Agricultural, Forestry, Transitional District is primarily intended to accommodate agricultural operations and very low-density single-family residential development within the Rural Planning Area. The district corresponds to and implements the Mesa County Master Plan’s “Rural Agricultural,” “Rural/Residential 5,” “Rural/Agricultural 10,” “ Rural/Agricultural 17,” “Rural Agricultural 20 NB,” “Fruita 201-10,” “EOM 10,” “Conservation,” “Cooperative Planning Area,” and “Buffer” future land use classifications. §4.2 | Urban Residential Zoning Districts The URR, RSF-R, RSF-E, RSF-1, RSF-2, RSF-4, RMF-5, RMF-8, RMF-12, RMF-16, RMF-24 and MU-R Districts shall be known as Urban Residential Zoning Districts. -
Becker Township Joint Planning Board Zoning Ordinance Section 8
SECTION 8 – GENERAL RURAL DISTRICT SUBDIVISION 8.01: PURPOSE. The purpose of the General Rural District is to provide locations for agriculture, agriculturally- related development, and housing on lots without public sewer or water services. SUBDIVISION 8.02: PERMITTED USES. Agriculture and farm-related buildings Single Family Homes Parks and open space areas, public wildlife refuges, and forest preserves Unless further restricted in a conservation easement, open spaces can be used for the following: • Conservation uses (i.e. woodland, wetland, and prairie restorations); • Agricultural cropland and pasture, with the exception of animal feedlots; • Public utilities and easements (not to include antennas or towers); • Stormwater and erosion control systems; • On site sewage collection and treatment systems; and • Recreational and Non-commercial uses such as: • Common Land Use (trails, gardens, playgrounds, etc.) • Common Structures (picnic shelters, restored barns, etc.) Open space uses shall be limited to natural and recreational uses and shall not conflict with the intent of the Agricultural Zoning District and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan as determined by the Planning Commission. Private Communication Towers up to 175 feet in height (See Section 17, Telecommunications Towers and Facilities) Kennels, Private Housing, With Services as defined herein Housing, Child Care Center, Single Family as defined herein Housing, Group Family Daycare as defined herein SUBDIVISION 8.03: CONDITIONAL USES. Land in the General Rural District may be -
A Rural District's Response to COVID-19
Collaboration and Addressing Student Needs: A Rural District’s Response to COVID-19 Hannah Melnicoe and Priyanka Kaura COVID-19 has disrupted California’s education system in fundamental ways. Districts across the state are quickly creating strategies to serve all students, and many are designing their response around the needs of their most vulnerable students. This brief highlights the response of Mother Lode Union School District (MLUSD) to the COVID-19 pandemic, in which district staff and teachers were able to collaborate—despite the unprecedented crisis—to meet student needs. As local and state leaders respond to the unique challenges presented by the onset of COVID-19, sharing effective practices is especially critical given the scope of the crisis and the speed with which districts will need to make changes. This process of rapid response requires that leaders at all levels of the system have access to promising strategies that they can quickly and effectively implement as well as opportunities to learn from one another about what works under which conditions and for which students. This practice brief is the second in a series in partnership with Pivot Learning that profiles promising responses to the COVID-19 crisis to meet vulnerable students’ needs. June 2020 This brief highlights the response of Mother Lode Union together. This is an unprecedented time.” Teachers, staff, School District (MLUSD)1 to the COVID-19 pandemic, in and administrators were able to build on their years of which district staff and teachers were able to collaborate collaborative relationships and to focus their energies on despite this crisis to meet student needs. -
How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation
NATIONAL REGISTER BULLETIN Technical information on the the National Register of Historic Places: survey, evaluation, registration, and preservation of cultural resources U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Cultural Resources National Register, History and Education How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation's natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to tribes. The National Park Service preserves unimpaired the natural and cultural resources and values of the National Park System for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of this and future generations. The Park Service cooperates with partners to extend the benefits of natural and cultural resource conservation and outdoor recreation throughout this country and the world. This material is partially based upon work conducted under a cooperative agreement with the National Conference ofState Historic Preservation Officers and the U.S. Department of the Interior. Date of publication: 1990; revised 1991, 1995, 1997. Revised for Internet 1995. Cover (Top Left) Criterion B - Frederick Douglass Home, Washington, D.C. From 1877- 1899, this was the home of Frederick Douglass, the former slave who rose to become a prominent author, abolitionist, editor, orator, and diplomat. (Walter Smalling, Jr.) (Top Right) Criterion D - Francis Canyon Ruin, Blanco vicinity, Rio Arriba County, New Mexico. A fortified village site composed of 40 masonry-walled rooms arranged in a cluster of four house blocks. Constructed ca. 1716-17 42 for protection against raiding Utes and Comanches, the site has information potential related to Na vajo, Pueblo, and Spanish cultures. -
Allocations to Leas Under ESSER & GEER
Federal Emergency Aid for Public Education: Allocations to LEAs under ESSER & GEER ESSER Allocations to LEAs in New Jersey Across all three federal laws (CARES, CRRSA, and ARP), SEAs must use at least 90 percent of their grant awards to make subgrants to LEAs in proportion to the amount of funds that each LEA received under Title I, Part A in the most recent fiscal year. minimum DOE distribution to LEAs ESSER I Fund $279,334,092 ESSER II Fund 1,107,874,581 ARP ESSER Fund 2,488,128,933 Total, ESSER $3,875,337,606 GEER Allocations to New Jersey Both the CARES Act and CRRSA Act provided funding to Governors through the Governor’s Emergency Education Relief (GEER) Fund. The U.S. Department of Education is required to allocate 60 percent of the funds based on each state’s relative population of individuals aged 5 through 24, and 40 percent based on each state’s relative number of children counted under the Title I, Part A formula. GEER I Fund $68,864,994 GEER II Fund 29,926,370 Total, GEER $98,791,364 GEER funds may be used by the Governor of New Jersey in support of public elementary and secondary education, institutions of higher education (IHEs), or other education-related entities. A Governor has wide discretion in determining the entities in the State that will receive GEER funds. A Governor can choose to fund only LEAs, only IHEs, only education-related entities, or any combination of eligible entities. New Jersey Department of Education Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Local Education Agency (LEA) Allocations -
Original RFP Document: Managed Business/Operational
7145 West Tidwell Road ~ Houston, Texas 77092 (713) 462-7708 www.esc4.net Publication Date: September 17, 2015 NOTICE TO OFFEROR SUBMITTAL DEADLINE: Thursday, October 8, 2015 @ 2:00 PM CT Questions regarding this solicitation must be submitted in writing to Jason Wickel at [email protected] or (713) 744-8189 no later than October 1, 2015. All questions and answers will be posted to both www.esc4.net and www.tcpn.org under Solicitations. Offerors are responsible for viewing either website to review all questions and answers prior to submitting proposals. Please note that oral communications concerning this RFP shall not be binding and shall in no way excuse the responsive Offeror of the obligations set forth in this proposal. Request for Proposal (RFP) by Region 4 Education Service Center (“ESC”) for Managed Business/Operational Services and Solutions On behalf of itself, other government agencies and non-profits, made available through The Cooperative Purchasing Network “TCPN.” Solicitation Number 15-19 Note: Envelopes must be sealed, prominently marked with the RFP solicitation number, RFP title, RFP opening time/date and name of vendor. Electronic submissions of the RFP will not be accepted. Submissions must be received by the Region 4 ESC office at: 7145 West Tidwell Road, Houston, TX 77092 no later than 2:00 pm CT, at which time the bid opening process shall commence. Proposals will be collected in a conference room to be determined by Region 4 ESC and opened and recorded publicly. Any proposal received later than the specified time, whether delivered in person, courier or mailed, shall be disqualified. -
Preliminary 2016 ESEA Accountability Profiles School Level
Preliminary 2016 ESEA Accountability Profiles School Level Boonton Town School District 27-0450-020 Boonton High School This table presents the participation and performance determinations for this school under §1112 of ESEA. School Performance - English Language Arts/Literacy School Participation Goal - 95% School Performance # Enrolled % Not Met Total Valid % Meeting Subgroup Tested Participation Scores Standards Schoolwide 298 0.3 YES 214 45.3 White 184 0.5 YES 128 52.4 Black 17 0.0 - 13 23.1 Hispanic 54 0.0 YES 37 18.9 American Indian 0 0.0 - 0 0.0 Asian 42 0.0 YES 35 57.1 Two or More Races 1 0.0 - 1 0.0 Students with Disabilities 50 0.0 YES 37 16.2 English Language Learners 0 0.0 - 0 0.0 Economically Disadvantaged 67 0.0 YES 48 41.7 School Performance - Mathematics School Participation Goal - 95% School Performance # Enrolled % Not Met Total Valid % Meeting Subgroup Tested Participation Scores Standards Schoolwide 296 0.7 YES 211 23.6 White 184 0.5 YES 128 30.5 Black 16 6.3 - 11 9.1 Hispanic 53 0.0 YES 36 2.8 American Indian 0 0.0 - 0 0.0 Asian 42 0.0 YES 35 25.7 Two or More Races 1 0.0 - 1 0.0 Students with Disabilities 49 2.0 YES 35 5.7 English Language Learners 0 0.0 - 0 0.0 Economically Disadvantaged 66 1.5 YES 46 19.6 Only Includes full year students for performance (Time In School < Year students are removed). A dash (-) Indicates too few students to determine (N<40 for Participation and N<30 for Performance). -
Participating Schools and Districts
Current Term:________ Professional Development Schools (PDS) Discount Waiver Form- Students who hold a NJ Instructional or Educational Services Certificate and are employed at a public school or a NJDOE approved School for Students with Disabilities collaborating with Centenary University as Professional Development Schools (PDS), receive a reduction in the tuition rate for classes. This applies to Education courses that have the GED designation in the course number, both on the Centenary University campus as well as classes offered at a PDS site or online. Please note that students need to be under contract for the full school year in order to be eligible for this discount. Beginning in Fall 2016 the PDS discount rate will be 35% for all new or readmitted PDS graduate students. PDS students who have taken courses prior to the Fall 2016 semester will be grandfathered in at the current 50% discount rate so long as they have not had an absence of one year or more. PDS students enrolled prior to Fall 2016 but not registered for courses for one year or more will need to be readmitted and will receive the 35% discount rate. For the Ed.D program the PDS discount rate is 25%. I am employed at a PDS school and hold the required NJ certificate. ___________________________ ______________________________ _________________________ Name of PDS School Printed Name of Person Registering Signature Name of Principal_______________________________ Signature ___________________________ *Please refer to the back of this page to confirm that your school is a PDS site. *Every semester this form needs to be filled out. Please return this form to the Student Accounts Office – Fax: (908)813-2632 or Email: [email protected] Update: 8/10/2020 Page: 1 of 2 The following is a complete list of the PDS schools and districts and their corresponding section code for courses offered at a PDS site. -
Alexandria Township School District AX Lafayette School District LS
The following is a complete list of the PDS schools and districs and their corresponding section code for courses This 2 or 3 letter code must appear on the registration form for courses offered at the respective school location. Alexandria Township School District AX Lafayette School District LS Allamuchy Township School District AE Lopatcong School District LD Alpha School District AL Lebanon Township School District LT Andover School District (Sussex County) AN Lenape Valley Regional High School LV Belleville School District BL Madison School District MSD Belvidere School District BS Mansfield Twp. School District MT Bethlehem Township School District BE Matheny School, (Lab school site) MS Blairstown School District BLS Mendham Township School District MTD Bloomfield School District BSD Middlesex Borough School District MSD Bloomsbury School District BM Milford Public School MBD Boonton Township BTS Montgomery Academy MA Bound Brook School District BBS Montville Township Public Schools MTS Butler School District BPS Morris Hills Regional High School District MH Byram Twp. Schools BT Mount Arlington School District MO Califon School District CA Mount Olive Township School District MD Celebrate the Children School CC Netcong Elementary School NE Clinton Township School District CT Newton School District NS Clinton Public School (Hunterdon County) CPH North Hunterdon Voorhees Regional H.S. District NH Cranford Public School District CPS North Warren Regional High School District NW Delaware Valley Regional High School District DV Ogdensburg