Ethiopia NHA V Household Survey

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ethiopia NHA V Household Survey Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Health National Health Account (NHA V) Household Health Service Utilization and Expenditure Survey EFY 2003 (2010/11) March 2014 Recommended Citation: Ethiopia Ministry of Health. April 2014. Ethiopia’s Fifth National Health Accounts 2010/2011. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Program Management and support, funding for the NHA activities, and printing of this NHA report was provided by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through Health Sector Financing Reform/Health Finance & Governance (HSFR/HFG) Project which is part of the USAID’s global Health Finance & Governance Project (HFG) Implemented by Abt Associates Inc. under cooperative agreementI -AID-OAA-A-12-00080. Table of Contents Pages List of Tables ....................................................................................................................................................... V List of Figures .................................................................................................................................................... VII Acronyms .......................................................................................................................................................... VIII Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................................................IX 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 The Ethiopian Economy ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Ethiopian Health Sector ................................................................................................................. 2 1.2.1 The Health System .......................................................................................................................... 2 1.2.2 Health Services ................................................................................................................................. 4 1.2.3 Health Outcomes ............................................................................................................................ 5 1.2.4 Health Care Financing .................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Background to the Study ....................................................................................................................... 7 1.4 Objectives of the Study .......................................................................................................................... 8 1.5 Limitations of the Study ......................................................................................................................... 8 1.6 Organization of the Report ................................................................................................................... 9 2. METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY ...................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Sampling Design .................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1.1 Coverage and Method of Data Collection ............................................................................. 10 2.1.2 Sampling Stages and Sample Selection ..................................................................................... 10 2.1.3 Sampling Weights.......................................................................................................................... 11 2.1.4 Sample Size and Sampling Frames ............................................................................................. 11 2.1.5 Recruitment and Training of Enumerators and Supervisors .............................................. 13 2.1.6 Deployment of Field Survey Teams.......................................................................................... 14 2.1.7 Data Processing and Analysis ..................................................................................................... 14 3. HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS ...................................................................................................... 15 II 3.1 Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics ....................................................................... 15 3.1.1 Age and Sex Composition .......................................................................................................... 15 3.1.2 Marital Status ................................................................................................................................. 15 3.1.3 Educational Status ......................................................................................................................... 16 3.1.4 Employment Status ....................................................................................................................... 17 3.1.5 Housing and Housing Amenities ............................................................................................... 18 3.1.6 Ownership of Physical Assets .................................................................................................... 21 4. GENERAL HEALTH STATUS .................................................................................................................. 23 4.1 Self-Reported Health Status and Incidence of Mortality ............................................................. 23 4.2 Use of Emergency Health Care ......................................................................................................... 24 4.3 Incidence of Mortality .......................................................................................................................... 26 4.4 Self-Reported Illnesses and Health Care Seeking Behavior ........................................................ 29 4.5 Reasons for Not Seeking Health Care ............................................................................................ 33 4.6 Prevalence of Chronic Illnesses ......................................................................................................... 36 5. USE OF OUTPATIENT HEALTH SERVICES ........................................................................................ 38 5.1 Outpatient Health Care Seeking Behavior ..................................................................................... 38 5.2 Choice of Outpatient Service Providers ......................................................................................... 41 5.3 Bypassing the Nearest Outpatient Service Providers .................................................................. 44 5.4 Distance Traveled to Obtain Outpatient Health Services .......................................................... 47 5.5 Patient Satisfaction with Outpatient Services ................................................................................ 48 5.6 Patient Compliance with Outpatient Health Care Treatment Prescriptions ......................... 50 6. USE OF INPATIENT HEALTH SERVICES ............................................................................................. 52 6.1 Inpatient Health Service Seeking Behavior ..................................................................................... 52 6.2 Choice of Inpatient Health Service Providers ................................................................................ 55 6.3 Bypassing the Nearest Inpatient Health Service Providers ......................................................... 57 6.4 Distance Traveled to Obtain Inpatient Health Services .............................................................. 60 6.5 Patient Satisfaction with Inpatient Health Services ....................................................................... 61 7. HEALTH CARE EXPENDITURES ........................................................................................................... 63 III 7.1 Out-of-Pocket Expenditures on Health Care ................................................................................ 63 7.2 Health Spending by Type of Health Services and Health Care Providers ............................... 65 7.3 Health Spending by Type of Service and Components of Health Care ................................... 67 7.4 Source of Funds for Financing OOP Health Spending ................................................................. 71 8. HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE ..................................................................................................... 73 8.1 Health Insurance Coverage ................................................................................................................ 73 8.2 Source of Money for Payment of Health Insurance Premiums .................................................. 75 9. CONCLUSIONS AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS .............................................................................. 76 9.1 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................................ 76 9.2 Policy Implications ................................................................................................................................ 79 References ........................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: 2015 HRF Projects Map (As of 31 December 2015)
    Ethiopia: 2015 HRF projects map (as of 31 December 2015) Countrywide intervention ERITREA Legend UNICEF - Nutrition - $999,753 Concern☃ - VSF-G ☈ ! Refugee camp WFP - Nutrition (CSB) - $1.5m National capital Shimelba Red Sea SUDAN Regional intervention International boundary Hitsa!ts Dalul UNICEF - Health - $1.0m ! !Hitsats ! ! Undetermined boundary ! ! SCI Tigray, Afar, Amhara, Oromia, Kelete Berahile ☃☉ May-Ayni Kola ! Somali, Gambella, SNPR & NRC - ☉ Ts!elemti Temben Awelallo Lake IRC - ★ ! ☄ ! ♫ Tanqua ! SUDAN ! ! ! Dire Dawa Adi Harush ! Enderta Abergele ! Ab Ala Afdera Project woredas Tselemt ! NRC - Debark GAA - ☇ ! WFP (UNHAS) - Coordination ☈ Abergele! Erebti ☋☉ Plan Int. - ACF - ☃ Dabat Sahla ☃Megale Bidu and Support Service - $740,703 Janamora Wegera! Clusters/Activities ! Ziquala Somali region Sekota ! ! Concern - SCI Teru ! Agriculture CRS - Agriculture/Seed - $2,5m ☃ ☃ Kurri ! Dehana ! ☋ ! Gaz Alamata ! Elidar GAA - ☋ Amhara,Ormia and SNNP regions ! ☃☉ Gonder Zuria Gibla ! Gulf of ! Education Plan Int. - Ebenat Kobo SCI☃☉ ☃ ! Gidan ☄ Lasta ! Aden CARE - Lay Guba ! Ewa ! ☃ ! Meket Lafto Gayint ! Food security & livelihood WV - ☃ Dubti ☈ ☉ ! Tach Habru Chifra SCI - ☃ Delanta ! ! - Tigray Region, Eastern Zone, Kelete Awelall, ! Gayint IMC - ☃ Health ☉ Simada Southern Zone, Alamata and Enderta woredas ! ! Mile DJIBOUTI ☊ Mekdela ! Bati Enbise SCI- Nutrition ! Argoba ☃☉ WV - ☃ Sar Midir Legambo ☃ ! Oxfam GB - Enarj ! ☉ ! ! Ayisha Non Food Items - Amhara region, North Gonder (Gonder Zuria), Enawga ! Antsokiya Dalfagi ! ! ! Concern
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Extension Gap Among Improved Bread Wheat Producer's
    vv ISSN: 2640-7906 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17352/ojps LIFE SCIENCES GROUP Received: 15 May, 2021 Research Article Accepted: 31 May, 2021 Published: 02 June, 2021 *Corresponding author: Sintayehu Abebe, Ethiopian Analysis of extension gap Institute of Agricultural Research, Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center, Assela, P. O.Box 489, Ethiopia, Tel: +251 9 13 10 42 04; E-mail: among improved bread wheat Keywords: Bread wheat; Extension gap; Clustered- based; Demonstration producer’s farmers found https://www.peertechzpublications.com at Arsi Robe District of Arsi Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia Sintayehu Abebe* Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center, Assela, P. O.Box 489, Ethiopia Abstract This study reports the analysis of agricultural extension gap among four improved bread wheat varieties at Arsi Robe district, Arsi Zone, along with their management practices under farmers ’condition to enhance farmers’ knowledge and skill on bread wheat production. Four improved bread wheat varieties were used to demonstrate namely Honkolo,DEKA,Hidase(check) and Lemu. Honkolo variety had a 43.8% yield advantage over the standard check (Hidase), DEKA had a 16.4% yield advantage over the standard check (Hidase), and the variety Lemu had a negative -25.8% yield loss or below the standard check (Hidase) and it conclude that both Honkolo and DEKA varieties are the fi rst and second option for the farmers whereas the variety Lemu is not recommended due to low productivity in the study area and others areas having similar agro ecologies. The result of agricultural extension gap analysis showed that Honkolo variety had a -2.7q/ha yield increment or in other words Honkolo variety had achieved 104.3% of the potential at research fi eld and had a 4.3% yield advantage than the research fi eld.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 3 Demography, Data Processing and Cartography
    VOLUME 3 DEMOGRAPHY, DATA PROCESSING AND CARTOGRAPHY M. Rahmi, E. Rabant, L. Cambrézy, M. Mohamed Abdi Institut de Recherche pour le Développement UNHCR – IRD October 1999 97/TF/KEN/LS/450(a$ Index MAJOR FINDINGS ...…………………………………………….……….…………….3 I-1 : Demography ...…………………………………………….……….…………….3 I-2 : Exploitation of the aerial mosaics …………………………………………..5 1 - Cartography of the refugee camps. …………………………………...……...5 2 - Estimation of the populations ………………………………………………..…6 I-3 – Conclusion : results of the integration of maps and data in a GIS … 10 II – Demography data processing ………………………………………………....13 Table 1. Number of households and family size …….....………………..….…....13 Graph 1 . Family size ..…………………………………….………………….14 Graph 2. Family size (percentage) …………………….…….……………. 15 Table 2 : Number of refugees by sex and by block …….……………...…... 15 Table 3 : number of households and family size by blocks ………………… 20 Table 4 : population by age and by sex. ……………………………...… 26 Graph 3. Pyramid of ages …………………………………………………29 Table 5 : Relationship by sex …………………………………………………38 Graph 4 : relationship …………………………………………………………39 Table 6 : Number of refugees by sex and nationality ………………….40 Table 7 : Number of refugees by sex and province of origin ………….41 Table 8 : UNHCR codes for districts and nationality ………………….43 Table 9 : Number of refugees by nationality, sex, and district of origin. ………………… 50 Table 10 : Principal districts of origin of somalian refugees (population by block and by sex). ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 69 Table 11 : Principal
    [Show full text]
  • 73-84 Association of Arabica Coffee Quality Attributes with Selected So
    East African Journal of Sciences (2015) Volume 9 (2) 73-84 Association of Arabica Coffee Quality Attributes with Selected Soil Chemical Properties Adugnaw Mintesnot1*, Nigussie Dechassa2,and Ali Mohammed1 1Jimma University, Department of Horticulture, P. O. Box 307, Jimma, Ethiopia 2Haramaya University, Department of Plant Sciences, P. O. Box 138, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia Abstract: Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) bean quality attributes differ based on the origin of the produce. Several agro-ecological conditions influence coffee bean quality attributes. Soil chemical properties may be some of the factors affecting the quality attributes. However, no study has so far been conducted to elucidate the association of coffee bean qualities with soil chemical properties in both major and minor coffee growing regions of Ethiopia. Thus, this research was conducted with the objective of establishing association of chemical soil properties with coffee cup quality attributes. Coffee beans as well as soil samples from which the beans originated were subjected to chemical analysis. The coffee beans and the corresponding soil samples originated from large scale coffee plantations (Bebeka, Gemadro and Goma), districts from southwestern major coffee growing region (Gore, Jimma, Lemkefa), West (Gimbi), East (Badano, Chiro, Darolebu, Habro and Melkabelo), South (Yirgacheffe) and northwestern minor coffee growing districts (Ankasha, Bure, Mecha and Jabi). The soil samples were collected from the depth of 0 - 50 cm near the coffee trunks and samples of ripe coffee cherries were picked up from the trees during the 2010/11 harvest season. Selected chemical properties of the soil, namely, available potassium, cation exchange capacity, exchangeable acidity, exchangeable bases, available micronutrients, available phosphorus, total nitrogen, soil pH, electrical conductivity, and percent organic carbon were determined from 53 soil samples in Jimma University soil laboratory and Wolkitie Soil Testing and Soil Fertility Improvement Centre using the established procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Composition and Carbon Pools Along Altitudinal Gradient: the Case of Gara–Muktar Forest, West Hararghe Zone, Eastern Ethiopia
    Forestry Research and Engineering: International Journal Research Article Open Access Floristic composition and carbon pools along altitudinal gradient: the case of gara–muktar forest, west hararghe zone, eastern Ethiopia Abstract Volume 4 Issue 1 - 2020 Forests play vital role in combating climate change through carbon sequestration in the Asaminew Wodajo,1 Mehari A Tesfaye,2 atmosphere and serving as a carbon sink in the form of carbon pool systems of forest 3 ecosystems. The species composition and carbon stock in the different carbon pools Muktar Mohammed 1Bonga Agricultural Research Centre, Ethiopia, and analysis of the influence of the environmental gradients were studied by systematic 2Central Ethiopia Environment and Forest Research, Ethiopia sampling method collecting data in thirty-six quadrant plots of 20x20m each distributed 3Oda Bultum Universities, Ethiopia along transect lines. Diameter at breast ≥5cm and total height measured for each tree in the main plot. Above and below ground biomass was estimated using allometric equation, Correspondence: Mehari Alebachew Tesfaye, Central Ethiopia while the litter carbon was estimated by taking 50% of dry biomass as carbon. Soil sample Environment and Forest Research Centre box 30708, Addis was collected using auguring method and analyzed following Walkley-Black method, Ababa, Ethiopia, Tele +251911356756, while bulk density was performed using core sampling method. The data was analyzed Email was performed using one way ANOVA of R software. The carbon stocks in aboveground, belowground, litter biomass and soil organic carbon showed distinct variation along Received: November 27, 2020 | Published: February 28, 2020 environmental gradients. The aboveground and below ground carbon stock was showed a decreasing trend along with increasing altitude, while soil organic carbon and liter carbon showed increasing trend along with increasing in altitude.
    [Show full text]
  • On Farm Production Systems Characterization of Indigenous Cattle in Bako Tibe and Gobu Sayo Districts of Oromia Region, Ethiopia
    Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-3208 (Paper) ISSN 2225-093X (Online) Vol.6, No.22, 2016 On Farm Production Systems Characterization of Indigenous Cattle in Bako Tibe and Gobu Sayo Districts of Oromia Region, Ethiopia Dereje Bekele 1 Kefelegn Kebede 2 A.K. Banarjee 2 1.Oromia Agricultural research Institute, Bako Agricultural Research center, Bako, Ethiopia 2.Haramaya University, School of Animal and Range Sciences, Haramaya, Ethiopia Abstract The study was conducted in Bako Tibe and Gobu Sayo districts of Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia, from October 2014 to January 2015 with the objective to undertake on-farm production system characterization of indigenous cattle breed (Horro) in the study area. Field studies and collection of data were carried out through semi-structured questionnaire, focus group discussions, key informants and secondary data collection from different sources. A total of 120 households (60 from each district) were randomly selected for semi structured questionnaire interview. SAS and SPSS software were used to analyze the data. The study result revealed that overall cattle herd size was 9.67±3.34 heads per household and was not significantly different (p<0.05) between districts. The main purposes of keeping Horro cattle in both locations were draught power, milk production, income, manure and threshing of crop. The age at first service (AFS) of male Horro cattle was 3.47±0.39 years. The age at first mating (AFM) and age at first calving (AFC) of female cattle were 3.73±0.51 and 4.98±0.68 years respectively. The calving interval (CI) of Horro cow was estimated to be 1.88±0.49 years and showed no significant difference between locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: West Guji – Gedeo Conflict Displacement Flash Update 2
    Ethiopia: West Guji – Gedeo Conflict Displacement Flash Update 2 22 May 2018 Highlights • A rapid assessment conducted in Gedeo zone (SNNPR) found that at least 274,5481 people were displaced from West Guji (Oromia) to Gedeo zone following the violence that erupted along the regional boundary in mid-April. Some 84,000 people were also displaced in West Guji zone. More than 4,000 houses were reportedly burnt down or damaged in West Guji and livelihoods destroyed. • Official reports indicate that as of early May, 102,593 people of the 274,548 people displaced in Gedeo were returned to their villages in West Guji zone • The Government, the local community and civil society were the first and main responders to date, with sup- port from few partners. Significant gaps in food, shelter, NFI and WaSH are reported • Although there were no reported health outbreaks so far, AWD, scabies and measles are potential health risks due to the use of water from unsafe sources, open defecation, overcrowded shelter and sharing of clothes. The overcrowded shelter conditions within hosting households also present protection concerns. Dara Sidama Dila I. Displacement overview ! 12,176 452 Bore Chichu A rapid assessment conducted in Gedeo zone ! 3,772 (SNNPR) from 2 to 8 May found that at least Dila Zuria stite eturns 274,548 people (139,494 male; 135,104 female) Wenago einin ! were displaced from West Guji (Oromia) to Gedeo Bule isceent 4,844 ! Koti ! zone, following the inter-communal violence that 8,198 Ilalcha ! erupted in mid-April 2018 along the borders of the Wenago Bule Abaya two zones.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 HS 000 ETH 013013 A4.Pdf (English)
    ETHIOPIA:Humanitarian Concern Areas Map (as of 04 February 2013) Eritrea > !ª !ª> Note: The following newly created woreda boundaries are not Tahtay !ª E available in the geo-database; hence not represented in this Nutrition Hotspot Priority Laelay Erob R R !ª Adiyabo Mereb Ahferom !ª Tahtay Gulomekeda !ª I E map regardless of their nutrition hot spot priority 1 & 2: Adiyabo Leke T D Adiyabo Adwa Saesie Dalul Priority one Asgede Tahtay R S Kafta Werei Tsaedaemba E E Priority 1: Dawa Sarar (Bale zone), Goro Dola (Guji zone), Abichu Tsimbila Maychew !ª A Humera Leke Hawzen Berahle A Niya( North Showa zone) and Burka Dintu (West Hararge Priority two > T I GR AY > Koneba Central Berahle zone) of Oromia region, Mekoy (Nuer zone) of Gambella Western Naeder Kola Ke>lete Awelallo Priority three Tselemti Adet Temben region, Kersadula and Raso (Afder zone), Ararso, Birkod, Tanqua > Enderta !ª Daror and Yo'ale (Degahabour zone), Kubi (Fik zone), Addi Tselemt Zone 2 No Priority given Arekay Abergele Southern Ab Ala Afdera Mersin (Korahe zone), Dhekasuftu and Mubarek (Liben Beyeda Saharti Erebti Debark Hintalo !ª zone), Hadigala (Shinille zone) and Daratole (Warder Abergele Samre > Megale Erebti Bidu Wejirat zone) of Somali region. Dabat Janamora > Bidu International Boundary Alaje Raya North Lay Sahla Azebo > Wegera Endamehoni > > Priority 2: Saba Boru (Guji zone) of Oromia region and Ber'ano Regional Boundary Gonder Armacho Ziquala > A FA R !ª East Sekota Raya Yalo Teru (Gode zone) and Tulu Guled (Jijiga zone) of Somali region. Ofla Kurri Belesa
    [Show full text]
  • IOM in Ethiopia IOM PRESENCEIOM Presence in Ethiopia in ETHIOPIA2021
    0 IOM in Ethiopia IOM PRESENCEIOM Presence in Ethiopia IN ETHIOPIA2021 Dalol ERITREA TIGRAY Shire Central YEMEN Western Welkait Tselemti Afdera Zone 2 North Gondar Mekele SUDAN Metema Bidu LEGEND Kinfaz Central Gondar Ofla Teru Kurri Country Office Zone 4 Elidar West Gondar Takusa Quara Lake Tana Alfa Zone 1 DJIBOUTI Jawi North Wello Ewa Sub-Offices Chifra Semera Guba AMHARA Dangura Bahir Dar Mile Migration Response Adaa'r Awi Centres (MRCs) Metekel South Wello AFAR Ayisha Wenbera Medical Health Assessment Gablalu East Gojam Gewane Centre (MHAC) Siti BENISHANGUL GUMUZ Zone 3 Shinile Dembel Transit centres Assossa East Togochale Kemashi North Shewa Wellega Horo Guduru North Shewa SOMALIA DIRE DAWA SOUTH SUDAN West Wellega Nekemte 3 Country Capital West Shewa HARARI Jigjiga Fafan Kelem Wellega Harshin ADDIS ABABA East Hararge Regional Capitals South West Hararge West Shewa East Shewa Buno Bedele Daror Itang Ilu Aba Bora Guraghe Fik Disputed Boundaries elit, Gashamo ng ci is p i Jarar d a Gambela r e u t e t c e s Akobo n co t, me t a Arsi i r s Jimma GAMBELA lo Lege Hida Erer o d m u s p i Siltie m e r o Seru Galhamur Agnewak L Burqod Dig International Boundary Cheka Hadiya Sagag Bokh Gog Danod Garbo Kefa OROMIA Seweyna Marsin Doolo Dima Ayun Nogob Regional Boundary Bench Maji Dawuro West Arsi Konta Wolayita Hawassa SOMALI Galadi Rayitu Goglo Warder Bale East Imi SNNPR Sidama Danan Zone Boundary Korahe Gofa Mirab Omo Gamo Gedeo Countries Surma Maji Elkare/Serer Shilabo Male Amaro Meda Welabu Shabelle Bule Hora Guji Water Bodies Hargele Adadle South Omo West Guji Kelafo Konso Liben Charati Afder Ferfer Liban Hamer Filtu Arero Elwaya Yabelo Teltale Barey Dolobay Borena Wachile Mubarek Daawa Dilo Dhas Dolo Ado KENYA Dire Moyale Miyo UGANDA Sources: CSA 2007, ESRI, IOM Date: 3 February 2019 Disclaimer : This map is for illustration purposes only.
    [Show full text]
  • Globalization: Global Politics and Culture (Msc)
    LAND GRAB IN ETHIOPIA: THE CASE OF KARUTURI AGRO PRODUCTS PLC IN BAKO TIBE, OROMIYA Dejene Nemomsa Aga Supervisor: Professor Lund Ragnhild Master Thesis Faculty of Social Sciences and Technology Management Department of Geography Globalization: Global Politics and Culture (MSc). May 2014, Trondheim, Norway Globalization: Global Politics and Culture (M.Sc) Declaration I, the undersigned, declare that this thesis is my original work and all materials used as a source are duly acknowledged. Name:........................ Dejene Nemomsa Aga Date:……………........... 23 May, 2014 Dejene Nemomsa Aga Page i Globalization: Global Politics and Culture (M.Sc) Dedication I dedicate my master thesis work to anti-land grabbing protesters of Oromo Students and People, who were recently killed while protesting the implementation of ‘Integrated Development Master Plan of the Capital City of the country, Finfinne’, which planned to displace more than one million indigenous Oromo People from their ancestral land. 23 May, 2014 ii Dejene Nemomsa Aga Globalization: Global Politics and Culture (M.Sc) Acknowledgements Firsts, I would like to thank the almighty God. Next, my special thanks go to my advisor Professor Ragnhild Lund, for her guidance and detailed constructive comments that strengthened the quality of this thesis. Professor’s countless hours of reflecting, reading, encouraging, and patience throughout the entire process of the research is unforgettable. I would like to thank Norwegian University of Science and Technology for accepting me as a Quota Scheme Student to exchange knowledge with students who came from across the globe and Norwegian State Educational Loan Fund for covering all my financial expenses during my stay. My special thanks go to department of Geography, and Globalization: Global Politics and Culture program coordinators, Anette Knutsen for her regular meetings and advice in the research processes.
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA Selfhelpafrica.Org 2020-21 1 2020-21 Alemnesh Tereda, 28, and Marsenesh Lenina, 29, Injaffo Multi Barley Coop, Gumer
    ETHIOPIA selfhelpafrica.org 2020-21 1 2020-21 Alemnesh Tereda, 28, and Marsenesh Lenina, 29, Injaffo Multi barley Coop, Gumer caling up agricultural production, improving nutrition Last year, the organisation was involved in implementing security, developing new enterprise and market close to a dozen development projects, all of which Sopportunities for farmers, strengthening community- are being undertaken in collaboration with local and/or based seed production and building climate resilience, are international partners. all key areas of Self Help Africa’s work in Ethiopia. ETHIOPIA PROJECT KEY Scaling up RuSACCOs Strengthening & Scaling up of rehabilitaion of degraded lands and enhancement of livelihoods in Lake Ziway catchment ERITREA Feed the Future Gondar Dairy for Development Stronger Together: Linking Primary Seed and Seep Cooperative Union Addis Ababa Climate-Smart Agriculture SOMALILAND Capacity Building of Farmer Butajira Training Centers Unleashing the productive ETHIOPIA capacity of poor people through Graduation Approach in Ethiopia Integrated Community Development SOMALIA Livelihood Enhancement: Working Inclusively for Transformation KENYA 2 Implementing Programme Programme Donor Total Budget Time Frame Partner Area Climate-Smart Irish Aid € 806,695 2015 SOS Sahel, SNNP region 01 Agriculture (CSA) Farm Africa, 2019 Vita MF: Scaling Up Irish League of € 420,000 2020 Zonal Departments of N/Shewa Zone of 02 Rural Savings and Credit international Finance & Economic Amhara, N/Shewa Credit Cooperatives Development 2022 Cooperation
    [Show full text]