Arxiv:2105.10954V1 [Physics.Plasm-Ph] 23 May 2021

manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Progress toward Fusion Energy Breakeven and Gain as Measured against the Lawson Criterion Samuel E. Wurzel · Scott C. Hsu the date of receipt and acceptance should be inserted later Abstract The Lawson criterion is a key concept in the products exceeds the sum of the energy required to heat pursuit of fusion energy, relating the fuel density n, (en- the fusion fuel and the energy lost from the fusion fuel ergy) confinement time τ, and fuel temperature T to due to radiation, Lawson concluded that the product the energy gain Q of a fusion plasma. The purpose of of fuel density n and pulse duration τ (Lawson used this paper is to explain and review the Lawson crite- t) must exceed a certain threshold value. When ther- rion and to provide a compilation of achieved parame- mal conduction losses are included (extending Lawson's ters for a broad range of historical and contemporary analysis), the product of n and energy confinement time fusion experiments. Although this paper focuses on the τE must exceed a certain threshold value. We call this Lawson criterion, it is only one of many equally impor- product nτE (also nτ) the Lawson parameter. A suffi- tant factors in assessing the progress and ultimate like- ciently high T is implied such that the energy of charged lihood of any fusion concept becoming a commercially fusion products overcomes radiation losses. These con- viable fusion energy system. Only experimentally mea- ditions are now known as the Lawson criterion. A fusion sured or inferred values of n, τ, and T that have been plasma that has reached these conditions is said to have published in the peer-reviewed literature are included achieved ignition. Although ignition is not strictly re- in this paper. For extracting these parameters, we dis- quired for a commercial fusion energy system, all such cuss methodologies that are necessarily specific to dif- systems may need to come relatively close to ignition ferent fusion approaches (including magnetic, inertial, to have high enough values of energy gain Q required and magneto-inertial fusion). This paper is intended to for competitive economics. serve as a reference for fusion researchers and a tutorial Lawson's analysis was declassified in 1957 [2] and for all others interested in fusion energy. has formed the scientific basis for evaluating the physics Keywords fusion energy · nuclear fusion · Lawson progress of fusion research toward the key milestones of criterion · triple product energy breakeven and gain. Over time, the Lawson criterion has been cast into other formulations, e.g., the fusion triple product [3,4] (nT τE) and \p-tau" (pressure p 1 Introduction times τE), which have the same dimensions (with units of m−3 keV s or atm s) and combine all the relevant In 1955, J. D. Lawson identified a set of necessary phys- parameters conveniently into a single value. However, ical conditions [1] for a \useful" fusion system. By eval- these single-value parameters do not map to a unique arXiv:2105.10954v1 [physics.plasm-ph] 23 May 2021 uating the condition that the energy released in fusion value of energy gain, whereas unique combinations of nτ and T do map to unique values of energy gain. Vari- The authors' affiliation does not imply endorsement of this work or any specifically named experiment, institution, or ous plots of the Lawson parameter, triple product, and private company by ARPA-E, DOE, or the U.S. Government. \p-tau" versus year achieved or T have been published Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) for subsets of experimental results, e.g., [5,6,7,8], but U.S. Department of Energy to our knowledge there does not exist a comprehensive 1000 Independence Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20585 compilation of such data in the peer-reviewed literature E-mail: [email protected] that spans the major thermonuclear-fusion approaches 2 Samuel E. Wurzel, Scott C. Hsu of magnetic confinement fusion (MCF), inertial confine- compare various MCF concepts with respect to perfor- ment fusion (ICF), and magneto-inertial fusion (MIF). mance per cost [8, pp. 2-8 to 2-10], rather than solely This paper fills that gap. their performance as embodied in the Lawson parame- The motivation to catalog, define our methodolo- ter or triple product. gies for inferring, and establish credibility for a com- Because of these additional considerations, fusion pilation of these parameters stems from the prior de- approaches that have achieved the highest values of nτ velopment of the Fusion Energy Base (FEB) website and T , such as tokamak-based MCF [6] or laser-driven (http://www.fusionenergybase.com) by the first au- ICF [15,16], will not necessarily become the first com- thor. FEB is a free resource with a primary mission mercially viable fusion energy systems. In fact, most of providing unbiased information to those, especially private fusion companies focusing on developing com- private investors, interested in fusion energy. This pa- mercial fusion systems have opted for fusion approaches per provides open access to the many included plots, with lower demonstrated values to-date of the Lawson tables, and codes while also providing context for un- parameter and T because of the expectation that the derstanding the history of fusion research [9,10,11] and RAMI, economic, social, and regulatory requirements the tremendous scientific progress that has been made may be more readily achievable. Further discussion of in the 65+ years since Lawson's report. these other considerations are beyond the scope of this The combination of nτ and T is a scientific indicator paper but are discussed elsewhere in the fusion litera- of how far or near a fusion energy experiment is from en- ture, e.g., [17,18,12,8]. ergy breakeven and gain. Achieving high values of these This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 de- parameters is tied predominantly to plasma physics and fines the key variables used in the paper and provides related engineering challenges of producing stable plas- plots and tables of the compiled parameters. Section 3 mas (n), heating them to fusion temperatures (T ), and provides a review and mathematical derivations of the exerting sufficient control (τ). These challenges have Lawson criterion and the multiple definitions of fusion driven the development (since the 1950s) of the en- energy gain that are used by the fusion research com- tire scientific discipline of plasma physics, which has munity. Section 4 provides a physics-based justification dominated fusion energy research to this day. However, for the approximations required to compare fusion en- we emphasize that there are many additional consider- ergy gain across a wide range of fusion experiments and ations, entirely independent of but equally important as approaches. Readers primarily interested in seeing and the Lawson criterion, in evaluating the remaining tech- using the data without getting entangled in the details nical and socio-economic risks of any fusion approach can largely ignore Secs. 3 and 4. Section 5 provides a and the likelihood of any approach ultimately becoming summary and conclusions. The appendices provide ad- a commercially viable fusion energy system. These in- ditional supporting information, including plots of re- clude the feasibility and complexity of engineering and quired Lawson parameters and triple products versus materials subsystems that impact a commercial fusion temperature for different Q values for advanced fuels. system's RAMI (reliability, accessibility, maintainabil- ity, and inspectability) [12] and economics, and the is- sues of social acceptance [13] and government regula- tion, as illustrated conceptually in Fig. 1. This paper discusses only the progress of fusion energy along the axis of energy gain, and we caution the reader not to over-emphasize nor under-emphasize any one axis. Although we do not further emphasize it in this paper, a different scientific metric called the Sheffield parameter [14] aims to embody both the required physics performance (like the Lawson parameter) and the commercial attractiveness of MCF concepts. The Sheffield parameter can be thought of as a normalized triple product, i.e., physics performance per resource invested by explicitly including the parameter β, which is a mea- sure of how much plasma pressure (related to the triple product) can be confined for a given magnetic field Fig. 1 Progress towards commercially viable fusion energy (which affects cost and engineering difficulty). Thus, requires progress along three equally important axes. This the Sheffield parameter is arguably a better metric to paper focuses only on the axis of energy gain. Progress toward Fusion Energy Breakeven and Gain as Measured against the Lawson Criterion 3 2 Variable Definitions, Plots, and Data Tables Table 1 Definitions of variables used in this paper. This section provides a table of variable definitions (Ta- Variable Definition ble 1), as well as plots and tables of compiled Lawson Ti Ion temperature parameters, fuel temperatures, and triple products. In Te Electron temperature T Central ion temperature many places (especially Secs. 1, 3, and 5), we use the i0 Te0 Central electron temperature generic variables n, T , τ, Q for simplicity/economy. hTiin Neutron-averaged ion temperature However, in most of the paper and as indicated in Ta- T Generic temperature, used to refer to either ble 1, all these variables have more precise and dif- ion or electron temperature when Ti = Te n Ion density ferentiated versions with various subscripts. Note that i ne Electron density energy units (keV) are used for temperature variables ni0 Central ion density throughout this paper, and therefore the Boltzmann ne0 Central electron density constant k is not explicitly shown. n Generic density, used to refer to either ion or electron density when ni = ne in a pure Figure 2 plots achieved Lawson parameters versus hydrogenic plasma Ti for MCF, MIF, and ICF experiments, overlaid with τ Plasma confinement time contours of scientific energy gain Qsci, which is the fu- τE Energy confinement time τ ∗ Effective energy confinement time, see sion energy released divided by the energy delivered E Sec.

Load more