DOCSLIB.ORG

LNG Storage 2 Tanks 6.5-10.8 Bcm/Y up to 800.000 M LNG Storage up to 4 Tanks 3 3 3 3 3 3 MAX

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LNG Storage 2 Tanks 6.5-10.8 Bcm/Y up to 800.000 M LNG Storage up to 4 Tanks 3 3 3 3 3 3 MAX SHTOKMAN - BARENTS SEA SNØHVIT ASKELADD Kara Norway, Snøhvit subsidiary of MELKØYA Belgium, Zeebrugge Greece, Revithoussa Spain, El Ferrol (Mugardos) Italy, Toscana Offshore ALBATROSS Melkøya / Hammersfest Norway, Snøhvit Italy, Brindisi Ireland, Shannon Sea Hammerfest Start-up : 1987 Start-up : 2000 Start-up : 2007 Start-up : August 2007 Melkøya / Hammersfest Start-up : - Start-up : 2017 Start-up : 2013 Start-up : August 2007 3 3 MAX. HOURLY CAPACITY NOM. ANNUAL CAPACITY MAX. HOURLY CAPACITY NOM. ANNUAL CAPACITY MAX. HOURLY CAPACITY NOM. ANNUAL CAPACITY 8 bcm/y 320.000 m LNG Storage 2 tanks 6.5-10.8 bcm/y Up to 800.000 m LNG Storage Up to 4 tanks 3 3 3 3 3 3 MAX. HOURLY CAPACITY NOM. ANNUAL CAPACITY 6 current : 1.700.000 m (N)/h current : 9 bm (N)/year current : 735.000 m (N)/h current : 5,3 bm (N)/year current : 412.800 m (N)/h current : 3,6 bm (N)/year 3 4.3 10 t/year 2 trains 3 3 Italy, Taranto Germany, Rostock Open Season ongoing Open Season ongoing 3 3 future : 825.600 m (N)/h future : 7,3 bm (N)/year - 3,75 bm (N)/year by 2016 : 970.000 m (N)/h by 2016 : 7,3 bm (N)/year Russia, Shtokman Algeria, Arzew (GL 4Z - Camel) Start-up : - Start-up : - NOMINATION - ALLOCATION - Pechora Sea NOMINATION Yes ALLOCATION OBA NOMINATION Yes ALLOCATION OBA Teriberka - Barents Sea NOMINATION Yes ALLOCATION Pro Rata MATCHING - FLOW CONTROL - Start-up : 1964 3 3 MATCHING Yes FLOW CONTROL Yes MATCHING Yes FLOW CONTROL Yes MATCHING Yes FLOW CONTROL Yes SCHEDULE - MEASUREMENT - Barents 8 bcm/y 280.000 m LNG Storage 2 tanks 2-5 bcm/y 150.000-360.000 m LNG Storage SCHEDULE H/H MEASUREMENT Yes SCHEDULE D/D MEASUREMENT Yes Teriberka 6 SCHEDULE Yes MEASUREMENT Yes 0.9 10 t/year 3 trains 3 Sea 3 3 LNG STORAGE CAPACITY 137.500 m LNG Italy, Porto Empedocle Croatia, Adria LNG current : 3 LNG STORAGE CAPACITY 300.000 m LNG Murmansk 380.000 m LNG NUMBER OF TANKS - Start-up : 2015 Nuove Energie Omisalj (Dina) - Krk island 3 LNG STORAGE CAPACITY current : 130.000 m LNG NUMBER OF TANKS 3 Algeria, Bethioua (GL 1Z, GL 2Z) LNG STORAGE CAPACITY 3 2 by 2017 : up to 560.000 m LNG by 2016 : 225.000 m LNG MAX. SHIP CLASS SIZE REC. 3 MAX. LNG SHIP CLASS SIZE REC. 138.000 m LNG (not decided yet) 140.000 m LNG REYKJAVIK Start-up : 1978,1981 URL AUTHORISED SHIPS www.reganosa.com URL AUTHORISED SHIPS www.oltoffshore.it 8 bcm/y Start-up : 2017 NUMBER OF TANKS current : 2 NUMBER OF JETTIES 1 ICELAND current : 4 NUMBER OF JETTIES 1 6 by 2016 : 3 MIN. SEA DEPTH ALONG SIDE >25 m 16.2 10 t/year 12 trains Pomorskiy NUMBER OF TANKS MIN. SEA DEPTH ALONG SIDE 15 m Italy, Rada di Augusta - Priolo 10-15 bcm/y by 2017 (not decided yet) : 5 3 MAX. SEND OUT PRESSURE - bar MAX. LNG SHIP CLASS SIZE REC. 135.000 m LNG (*) MAX. SEND OUT PRESSURE 72 bar Start-up : - Strait 3 TPA REGIME Exempted Algeria, Skikda (GL 1K) MAX. SHIP CLASS SIZE REC. 266.000 m LNG URL AUTHORISED SHIPS www.desfa.gr TPA REGIME Regulated Croatia, Krk island Start-up : 1972 URL AUTHORISED SHIPS www.fluxys.com NUMBER OF JETTIES 1 8 bcm/y Start-up : - current : 1 MIN. SEA DEPTH ALONG SIDE 12,7 m NUMBER OF JETTIES The Netherlands, Rotterdam 3.1 106 t/year 5 trains by 2015 (under construction) : 2 MAX. SEND OUT PRESSURE 64 bar Italy, Porto Recanati (off-shore) Gate terminal Start-up : 2014 6 bcm/y TPA REGIME Regulated Kandalaksha Start-up : - MIN. SEA DEPTH ALONG SIDE 13 m Lybia, Marsa-el-Brega Sirte Oil Co. Gas LNG Europe (*) bigger ships may be accomodated, under specific conditions MAX. HOURLY CAPACITY NOM. ANNUAL CAPACITY Albania, Fiere (off-shore) Grupo Falcione MAX. SEND OUT PRESSURE 70 bar 3 3 Start-up : 1970 5 bcm/y TPA REGIME Regulated Start-up : 2011 by 2014 : 656.000 m (N)/h by 2014 : 5 bm (N)/year Start-up : 2016 Turkey, Aliaga 3 6 future : tba future : 7,5 bm (N)/year 0.6 10 t/year 3 trains Italy, Gioia Tauro LNG Medgas Terminal UK, Isle of Grain Start-up : 2006 8 bcm/y Avenue de Cortenbergh 100 Tel +32 2 209 05 00 [email protected] MAX. HOURLY CAPACITY NOM. ANNUAL CAPACITY Start-up : 2016 (Grain LNG) 3 3 NOMINATION - ALLOCATION - Egypt, Idku Liquefied Natural Gas MAX. HOURLY CAPACITY current : 1.650.000 m (N)/h current : 12 bm (N)/year MATCHING - FLOW CONTROL - Egyptian LNG Romania, Constanta B - 1000 Brussels Fax +32 2 209 05 01 www.gie.eu Start-up : 2005 NOM. ANNUAL CAPACITY 3 3 3 3 Start-up : 2005 12 bcm/y 680.000 m (N)/h 6,0 bm (N)/year by 2014/15 : 2.200.000 m (N)/h by 2014/15 : 16 bm (N)/year SCHEDULE - MEASUREMENT - NORNE Start-up : - 3 6 MAX. HOURLY CAPACITY NOM. ANNUAL CAPACITY NOMINATION - ALLOCATION - NOMINATION Yes ALLOCATION OBA by 2014 : 320.000 m LNG 7.2 10 t/year 2 trains Italy, Trinitapoli 3 3 LNG STORAGE CAPACITY 3 White Sea 2-8 bcm/y current : 2.650.000 m (N)/h current : 19,5 bm (N)/year MATCHING - FLOW CONTROL - MATCHING Yes FLOW CONTROL Yes future : 480.000 m LNG Start-up : - SCHEDULE H/H MEASUREMENT Yes ASGARD HELDRUN Egypt, Damietta Phase 4 by 2016+ : - Phase 4 by 2016+ : + up to 8 SCHEDULE - MEASUREMENT - by 2014 : 2 Faroe Islands (DK) Ukraine, Yuzhnyi 3 NUMBER OF TANKS KRISTIN Start-up : 2005 SEGAS 8-12 bcm/y 3 current : 540.000 m LNG future : 3 Start-up : 2018 NOMINATION Yes ALLOCATION Pro Rata LNG STORAGE CAPACITY 280.000 m LNG LNG STORAGE CAPACITY 3 HALTENPIPE by 2014 /15 : 720.000 m LNG 3 NJORD 6 MATCHING Yes FLOW CONTROL Yes MAX. LNG SHIP CLASS SIZE REC. 216.000 m LNG Italy, Falconara Marittima NUMBER OF TANKS 2 5.0 10 t/year 2 trains 10 bcm/y SCHEDULE D/D MEASUREMENT Yes MAX. SHIP CLASS SIZE REC. 265.000 m3 LNG current : 3 URL AUTHORISED SHIPS - Offshore Ukhta NUMBER OF TANKS DRAUGEN T Belomorsk 3 by 2014 /15 : 4 NUMBER OF JETTIES 1 Russia, Shtokman-Teriberka current : 1.000.000 m LNG URL AUTHORISED SHIPS - Start-up : - Turkey, Ceyhan 3 MIN. SEA DEPTH ALONG SIDE 14,5 m LNG MAP LNG STORAGE CAPACITY 3 NUMBER OF JETTIES 1 Barents Sea MAX. SHIP CLASS SIZE REC. 267.000 m LNG MAX. SEND OUT PRESSURE - Start-up : - Phase 4 by 2016+ : +190.000 m LNG MIN. SEA DEPTH ALONG SIDE - TRANSPORT Start-up : - 4 bcm/y URL AUTHORISED SHIPS www.gate.nl TPA REGIME Regulated n MAX. SEND OUT PRESSURE - current : 8 NUMBER OF JETTIES 2 ORMEN LANGE Tjeldbergodden Trondheim n.a. NUMBER OF TANKS TPA REGIME - 6 Gas LNG Europe is one of the three columns of Gas Infrastructure Europe MIN. SEA DEPTH ALONG SIDE 14,5 m Italy, Rosignano Phase 4 by 2016+ : +1 France, Dunkerque BRENT 7.5 10 t/year 3 MAX. SEND OUT PRESSURE 80 bar ASGARD Ravenna - Offshore - the European association of the Natural Gas Industry, the other columns being : MAX. SHIP CLASS SIZE REC. 265.000 m LNG MAGNUS Lithuania, Klaipeda (FSRU) Turkey, Marmara Ereglisi TPA REGIME Exempted Start-up : 2015 Tampen Link STATFJORD Norway, Tjeldbergodden URL AUTH. SHIPS www.nationalgrid.com/uk/GrainLNG/ MURCHINSON Cyprus, Vassilikos Start-up : - Start-up : 2014 Gas Transmission Europe and s Gas Storage Europe. Start-up : 1994 SNORRE Nyhamna NUMBER OF JETTIES 2 VISUND Start-up : - MAX. HOURLY CAPACITY NOM. ANNUAL CAPACITY 3 Shetlands TERN KVITEBJØRN 8 bcm/y MIN. SEA DEPTH ALONG SIDE 12,5 m Spain, Gijón (Musel) 3 LANGELED NORTH Medvezhegorsk up to 3 bcm/y 170.000 m LNG Storage All data provided on this map is for information purposes and shall be treated as indicative only. 3 6 MAX. SEND OUT PRESSURE 70 bar MAX. HOURLY CAPACITY NOM. ANNUAL CAPACITY by 2015 : 1.900.000 m (N)/h by 2015 : 13 bm (N)/year GULLFAKS 6 10 t/year NORTHERN LIGHTS 3 3 Start-up : 2013 Under no circumstances shall it be regarded as data intended for commercial use. TPA REGIME Exempted 685.000 m (N)/h 6,2 bm (N)/year HEATHER Italy, Zaule (Trieste) Estonia, Paldiski Balti Gaas NOMINATION Yes ALLOCATION OBA ALWYN HULDRA Petrozavodsk Start-up : 2015 All data relating to projects indicated on this Map is based on publicly available information. NOMINATION - ALLOCATION - MAX. HOURLY CAPACITY NOM. ANNUAL CAPACITY MATCHING Yes FLOW CONTROL Yes VESLEFRIKK Start-up : 2015 3 3 SCHEDULE H/H MEASUREMENT Yes BRAGE 3 UK, Milford Haven MATCHING - FLOW CONTROL - by 2013 : 800.000 m (N)/h by 2013 : 7 bm (N)/year TUNE 8 bcm/y 280.000 m LNG Storage 2 tanks 3 More current information on LNG projects can be found at www.gie.eu/GLE-Investment-Database TROLL Up to 3 bcm/y 320.000 m LNG Storage South Hook LNG SCHEDULE - MEASUREMENT - 3 3 3 future :1.200.000 m (N)/h future : 10,5 bm (N)/year LNG STORAGE CAPACITY by 2015 : 570.000 m LNG OSEBERG TOGI Kyroskoski Start-up : 2009 3 Finland, Joddbole or Tolkkinen Tampere Italy, Alpi Adriático LNG STORAGE CAPACITY 255.000 m LNG NUMBER OF TANKS by 2015 : 3 NORWAY SWEDEN Nokia Petrozavodsk Estonia, Muuga GLE IS REPRESENTING 14 MEMBERS IN 9 COUNTRIES AND 1 OBSERVER NOMINATION Yes ALLOCATION OBA 3 Montefalcone / Trieste - Offshore NUMBER OF TANKS 3 MATCHING Yes FLOW CONTROL Yes MAX.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Suez Canal Development Project: Egypt's Gate to the Future
    Economy Suez Canal Development Project: Egypt's Gate to the Future President Abdel Fattah el-Sissi With the Egyptian children around him, when he gave go ahead to implement the East Port Said project On November 27, 2015, President Ab- Egyptians’ will to successfully address del-Fattah el-Sissi inaugurated the initial the challenges of careful planning and phase of the East Port Said project. This speedy implementation of massive in- was part of a strategy initiated by the vestment projects, in spite of the state of digging of the New Suez Canal (NSC), instability and turmoil imposed on the already completed within one year on Middle East and North Africa and the August 6, 2015. This was followed by unrelenting attempts by certain interna- steps to dig out a 9-km-long branch tional and regional powers to destabilize channel East of Port-Said from among Egypt. dozens of projects for the development In a suggestive gesture by President el of the Suez Canal zone. -Sissi, as he was giving a go-ahead to This project is the main pillar of in- launch the new phase of the East Port vestment, on which Egypt pins hopes to Said project, he insisted to have around yield returns to address public budget him on the podium a galaxy of Egypt’s deficit, reduce unemployment and in- children, including siblings of martyrs, crease growth rate. This would positively signifying Egypt’s recognition of the role reflect on the improvement of the stan- of young generations in building its fu- dard of living for various social groups in ture.
    [Show full text]
  • Egypt (1914-2014): Global Architecture Before Globalization Mercedes Volait
    Egypt (1914-2014): Global architecture before globalization Mercedes Volait To cite this version: Mercedes Volait. Egypt (1914-2014): Global architecture before globalization. 2014, n.p. halshs- 01059419 HAL Id: halshs-01059419 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01059419 Submitted on 1 Sep 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Mercedes Volait, InVisu (CNRS/INHA) Egypt (1914-1954): Global architecture before globalization 1914 did not represent a major disruption in the development of Egyptian architecture; that is, architecture on Egyptian soil. Forces that had shaped its norms and forms during the previous half century continued to be at play throughout the subsequent decades. The relentless quest for modernity pursued by Egypt’s rulers and its ever growing state apparatus in the wake of the Ottoman reforms of the 1830s represents one such enduring factor. The strategy had meant to emulate Europe in order to resist its expansion. Although architectural modernity in the non-Western world is commonly attributed primarily to colonial agency, its development and domestication in the Egyptian context occurred within a top-driven endogenous process, embedded in Ottoman cosmopolitanism, and prone to all sorts of hybridizations.1 The British occupation of Egypt from 1882 to 1922 (with Protectorate status from 1914 to 1922) did not alter much this general pattern.2 In other words, an established tradition of borrowing and naturalizing European techniques and aesthetics characterized Egyptian architecture as it entered into the 20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Behind the Scenes
    ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd 502 Behind the Scenes SEND US YOUR FEEDBACK We love to hear from travellers – your comments keep us on our toes and help make our books better. Our well-travelled team reads every word on what you loved or loathed about this book. Although we cannot reply individually to postal submissions, we always guarantee that your feedback goes straight to the appropriate authors, in time for the next edition. Each person who sends us information is thanked in the next edition – the most useful submissions are rewarded with a selection of digital PDF chapters. Visit lonelyplanet.com/contact to submit your updates and suggestions or to ask for help. Our award-winning website also features inspirational travel stories, news and discussions. Note: We may edit, reproduce and incorporate your comments in Lonely Planet products such as guidebooks, websites and digital products, so let us know if you don’t want your comments reproduced or your name acknowledged. For a copy of our privacy policy visit lonelyplanet.com/ privacy. Wheeler, Zeina Abou Kheir, Marwa and Moham- OUR READERS med Abdel Rehim, Tim Baily, Aiman Zaki, and Many thanks to the travellers who used the Dr. Haitham Ibrahim and Mohamed Ezat of the last edition and wrote to us with helpful Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency. hints, useful advice and interesting anec- dotes: Jessica Lee Sara Marie Atkinson, Maximilian Benner, Ron In the Western Desert a huge alfa shuk to Mahdi Bongers, Kate Cinamon, Carolyn Davison, Jo Hweiti and Mohsen Abd Al Moneam, whose Fisher, Martin Hämmerle, Rob Jenneskens, enthusiasm for their job and incredible wealth Matthew Lombardi, Beatriz López-Ewert, An- of knowledge on all-things-oases puts other drew Machin, Morgan McDaniel, Paul Melian, tourist boards to shame.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Reconstruction of Egyptian Morale During the Aftermath of the 1967 Six Day War: an Arab Perspective
    Document created: 1 April 02 Examining the Reconstruction of Egyptian Morale During the Aftermath of the 1967 Six Day War: An Arab Perspective by Lt Youssef H. Aboul-Enein, USN Introduction If you say the Arabic words Al-Naksah (The Catastrophe) to an Egyptian, you get an immediate reaction that is unmistakable. For Palestinians, the same term referred to as Al-Nakbah, means the partition of Palestine in 1948. However to Egyptians it means only one date June 5, 1967, the Six-Day War. Most historians are aware of the specifics of the military campaign and the events leading to Israel’s surprise attack and destruction of the armed forces of Egypt, Jordan, and Syria. The purpose of this paper is to explore the effects on Egyptian morale and the particular ways in which the nation was able to recover its morale from a sociologic and military perspective. Few Americans have taken time to examine the writings of Egyptian scholars about the 1967 War. Some do not care to study losing side. Also there is the cumbersome task of reading and understanding Arabic. The author will utilize Arabic sources in discussing this topic. A basic understanding of Egyptian history and the Arab-Israeli Wars is necessary for readers to have a full appreciation of the period of time covered in Egyptian history (1967-1973). As the author does not intend to focus on military tactics, this will allow a more thorough examination of socio-political events. The Egyptian armed forces will only be explored as a subsection of society. This paper will explore the emotions of the military, Egypt’s youth, social questioning of the defeat, the effect the war had on popular culture, the reform of the military and finally the effects on the country’s political culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Security in the Middle East and North Africa: a Strategic Assessment
    MARITIME SECURITY IN THE MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA: A STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT By Robert M. Shelala II Research Analyst, Burke Chair in Strategy Anthony H. Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 3 Chapter I – A Brief Introduction to Maritime Security .................................................................. 4 Chapter II – The Suez Canal and the Growing Threat of Egyptian Terrorism ............................... 6 Background on the Canal ............................................................................................................ 6 The Threat of Terrorism .............................................................................................................. 8 Egyptian Maritime Security Capabilities .................................................................................. 13 Recommendations for Securing the Suez Canal ....................................................................... 17 Chapter III – The Gulf and Threats From Iran ............................................................................. 20 A Brief Introduction to the Gulf ................................................................................................ 20 Regional Tensions and Iranian Threats to Gulf Security .......................................................... 22 Escalation Drivers in Iranian Strategic Calculus......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • To Factory S^Rifications
    •• THE EVENING STAR. Washington,6 D. C. A-4 TCESDSY. KOVEMBEB «, ISM Wrecked Tanks 'Hell of Lead' Greeted Egyptian Mediterranean Sea I BRITISH I Front I COMMANDOS I Line Ismailia British 'Chutists' at Suez ¦ w NICOSIA, Cyprus, Nov. 6 (VP).—A correspondent who jumped Fighting Ended, with British paratroops over Egypt said today that Egyptian de- fenders met them with "a screeching, crackling hell.” Peter Woods of the London Daily Mirror flew out with the first Desert Road wave of transport aircraft in company with troopers his - r, of former Says » ' ~T-, , Israel ***./„ By ROBERT regiment the "Red Devils” of the . yj Fuad TUCKMAN airborne brigade. TEL AVIV, laradl, Nov. « UP. ; Associated Press Foreign Correspondent shattered the windows of the As the parachutists descended makeshift operating theater. —lsrael says fighting has stopped ISRAELI COMMAND POST their objective—Port 1 on Said's «i "I am writing,” Mr. Woods on the Egyptian front and her J ““A OVERLOOKING ISMAILIA.Nov. Gamil Airfield—“the sky became reported, "from the bloody littered s c*s- forces occupying Egypt's vast 6.—The main road from Israel; with white, black, green -1 ualty clearing station in a cap- land khaki parachutes,” Mr tured building.” desert Sinai Peninsula have been to Ismailia is lined with 49] (Woods said. ordered not to shoot. Egyptian Encounter Heavy knocked-out tanks and “Antiaircraft guns, machine-] Fire A guns, government spokesman said 330 wrecked Egyptian vehicles. tanks and small arms made Despite fierce fire the troops Israeli representatives at the BBFlafV the air around a screeching, s Many of the tanks are Soviet ' advanced and “soon the United Nations were instructed if/ crackling hell of lead.” first T34s.
    [Show full text]
  • The Suez Crisis: a Brief Comint History
    TOP SECRET united states cryptologic history The Suez Crisis: A BriefComint History (U) DECLASSIFIED UNDER AUTHORITY OF THE INTERAGENCY SECURITY CLASSIFICATION APPEALS PANEL, E.0.13526, SECTION 5.3(b)(3) ISCAP APPEAL NO. 2013-117, document no.1 DECLASSIFICATION DATE: March 05, 2018 THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CODEWORD MATERIAL NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS Cl.assified By NSA/CSSM 123-2 Oeclassify.011: Origmating Agency's Determination Req1.ured TePSECRET ... II Contents of this publication should not i,e reproduced, or further disseminated outside the U.S. Intelligence Community without the permiulon of the Director. NSA/CSS. Inquiries about reproduction and dissemination shouldbe directed to the Oftice ofCryptologic Archives and History, T54. r 'fOP SECRET UMBRA UNITED STATES CRYPTOLOGIC HIS.TORY Special Series Crisis Collection Volume2 The Suez Crisis: A BriefComint History (U) Withheld from public release under the National Security Act of 1959, 50 U.S.C. 3605 (P.L. 86-36) OFFICE OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERV~CE 1988 T-OP SECRH UMBRA , NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS .a UNCLASSIFIED TableofContents Page Foreword -;...·-·-·------------------·-··---·-----------------·-----·--------- v Background ---------····--------···-------·····------------------------···-· 1 The Rise ofNasser ------------------------~-----·----------·-------------------· 3 A Search for Weapons ------"".·------...:---·-----------------·---- 4 TheSoviet Factor ---------------------·-----·-------------------------- 8 Soviet
    [Show full text]
  • PROCEEDINGS OFTHE ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY Issue No 3 – January 1988 Committee Members
    PROCEEDINGS OFTHE ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY Issue No 3 – January 1988 Committee Members Chairman: Air Marshal Sir Frederick B Sowrey KCB CBE AFC General Secretary: B R Jutsum FCIS Membership Secretary: Group Captain H Neubroch OBE FBIM Treasurer: A S Bennell MA BLitt Programme Air Commodore J G Greenhill FBIM Sub-Committee: *Air Commodore H A Probert MBE MA Air Commodore A G Hicks MA CEng MIERE MRAeS T C G James CMG MA Publications S Cox BA MA Sub Committee: A E F Richardson P G Rolfe ISO Members: P G Cooksley ACP ARHistS *Group Captain M van der Veen MA CEng MIMechE MIEE MBIM *M A Fopp MA MBIM * ex-officio members 1 The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors concerned, and are not neces s arily those held by the Royal Air Force Historical Society or any member of the Committee. We are indebted to ROLLS-ROYCE plc for contributing to the cost of this issue. Copyright © Royal Air Force Historical Society, 1988. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any form whatsoever is prohibited, without express written permission from the General Secretary of the Society. 2 CONTENTS Page 1. A message from the Chairman 4 2. Editor’s Notes 5 3. Suez, 1956 - Air Aspects Introduction 9 Setting the Scene 10 The View from Whitehall 16 The Scene at the Air Ministry 20 The Planners’ Perspective 26 First Discussion Period 35 Map and charts 43 Command of the Operation 47 A Squadron Commander’s Viewpoint 51 Second Discussion Period 56 An Appraisal of the Air Campaign 61 Third Discussion Period 64 Conclusion 72 4 Book Reviews 74 The Friendly Firm Christmas Island Cracker 5 Two more profiles of Committee Members 76 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Suez Canal Salvage Operations in 1974
    Description of document: US Navy Salvage Report: Suez Canal Salvage Operations in 1974 Requested date: 20-December-2007 Released date: 17-December-2008 Posted date: 05-May-2009 Title of document Suez Canal Salvage Operations in 1974 Source of document: Department of the Navy Naval Sea Systems Command [email protected] The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. FOREWORD On 5 June 1975 the Suez C anal will again be open to the ships of the world for the first time since its closure during the 1967 Six-Day War, when ten ships were scuttled by Egyptian forces to close this important waterway to ocean going shipping.
    [Show full text]
  • Housing Study for Canal Governorates Final
    HOUSING STUDY FOR CANAL GOVERNORATES FINAL October 20, 2008 This publication is made possible by the support of the American People through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of BearingPoint, Inc and/or its implementing partners and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. HOUSING STUDY FOR CANAL GOVERNORATES FINAL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR POLICY REFORM II CONTRACT NUMBER: 263-C-00-05-00063-00 BEARINGPOINT, INC. USAID/EGYPT POLICY AND PRIVATE SECTOR OFFICE OCTOBER 20, 2008 AUTHORS: DAVID SIMS, HAZEM KAMAL AND DORIS SOLOMON SO 16 DISCLAIMER: This report is made possible by the support of the American people through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of BearingPoint, Inc and/or its implementing partners and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. CONTENTS List of Tables ......................................................................................................... iii Acronyms................................................................................................................v FOREWORD....................................................................................................... VI Background ........................................................................................................... vi TAPR II Housing Team........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Contentious Politics and the 25Th January Egyptian Revolution
    The London School of Economics and Political Science Contentious Politics and the 25th January Egyptian Revolution Neil Ketchley A thesis submitted to the Department of Government of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, September 2014 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 44,982 words. 2 Abstract The three articles that make up this thesis consider the diverse forms of contentious politics and mass mobilization that emerged during the 25th January Egyptian Revolution in 2011 and its aftermath. The first article, discussing the eighteen days of anti-Mubarak protest, pays special attention to the position of the Egyptian army in and around Midan al-Tahrir, and recounts how protestors sought to co-opt and neutralize the threat posed by regime forces. It finds that fraternizing protestors developed a repertoire of contention that made situational, emotional claims on the loyalty of regime troops.
    [Show full text]
  • The Suez Crisis: a Brief Comint History (U)
    TOP SECRET united states cryptologic history The Suez Crisis: A Brief Comint History (U) Declassified and approved for release by NSA, CIA, and State Department on O1-15-2013 pursuant to E .0. 13526. MOR 68546. "Ftll5 99Cl:IMENT C9NTAIN5 C9Q"-tJ9RQ MATliRIAL. NOT KliL.liA5A8bE "FQ F0AE16N NAft8NAL5 D@tlassHy 011. 01 ig1natiiiy Age11cj'1 Bi!tt• ''""atie,. Re"wJF@8 TOP SECRET DOCID: 4165421 ~ . • Contents of this publication should not be reproduced, or further disseminated outside the U.S. Intelligence Community without the permiaaion of the Director, NSA/CSS. Inquiries about reproduction and dissemination should be directed to the Office of Cryptologic Archives and History, T54. TOP S!<:IU!T tJMBltA UNITED STATES CRYPTOLOGIC HISTORY Special Series Crisis Collection Volume2 The Suez Crisis: A Brief Comint History (U) ...____~I •, •, •, •, •, •, •, •, •, P . L . 86- 36 OFFICE OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE 1988 1'6P SECRET HMBltA DOCID: • UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents Page Foreword ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- v Background -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 The Rise of Nasser ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 A Search for Weapons --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 The Soviet Factor ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 Soviet Surprise
    [Show full text]