DOCSLIB.ORG

2012 CCG Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2012 CCG Template Doing Business in Russia: 2012 Country Commercial Guide for U.S. Companies INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT, U.S. & FOREIGN COMMERCIAL SERVICE AND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 2012. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES. Chapter 1: Doing Business In Russia Chapter 2: Political and Economic Environment Chapter 3: Selling U.S. Products and Services Chapter 4: Leading Sectors for U.S. Export and Investment Chapter 5: Trade Regulations, Customs and Standards Chapter 6: Investment Climate Chapter 7: Trade and Project Financing Chapter 8: Business Travel Chapter 9: Contacts, Market Research and Trade Events Chapter 10: Guide to Our Services 1 Return to table of contents Chapter 1: Doing Business in Russia Market Overview Market Challenges Market Opportunities Market Entry Strategy Market Overview Return to top With over 140 million consumers, a growing middle class, and almost unlimited infrastructure needs, Russia remains one of the most promising markets for U.S. exporters. Russia is the world’s 11th largest economy by nominal GDP, 6th largest by PPP and has the highest per capita GDP ($13,236) of the BRIC countries. It is an upper middle income country, with a highly educated workforce and sophisticated, discerning consumers. Russia’s economy is still recovering from the economic crisis that started in 2008, with GDP growth at 4.3% for 2011. Economists forecast real GDP growth of 3.3% – 3.5% in 2012. Russia was the U.S.’s 31st largest export market and the 14th largest exporter to the U.S. in 2011. Russia accounted for 1.16% of total U.S. trade, making it our 20th largest trading partner overall. U.S. exports to Russia were $8.3 billion, the highest since 2008, and a 39% increase from 2010. This is more than double the growth rate for overall U.S. exports worldwide which were up only 16%. Russian exports to the U.S. were $35 billion, up 21% from 2010. Russian sources list the country’s leading trade partners as: Netherlands, China, Germany, Italy, Ukraine and Turkey. U.S. accumulated investment in Russia is approximately $10 billion. According to Russian data, the U.S. is Russia’s 10th largest foreign investor. Russia was formally invited to join the WTO on December 16, 2011, and accession should be finalized by August 2012. This will liberalize trade with the rest of the world and create opportunities for U.S. exports and investments. For industrial and consumer goods, Russia’s average bound tariff rate will decline from almost 10% to under 8%. - U.S. manufacturers and exporters will have more certain and predictable market access as a result of Russia’s commitment not to raise tariffs on any products above the negotiated rates. - More liberal treatment for service exports and service providers. - Stronger Commitments for Protection and enforcement of IPR. - Rules-based treatment of Agricultural exports. - Market access under country-specific tariff-rate quotas. - Improved transparency in trade-related rule-making. - More effective WTO dispute resolution mechanisms 2 Market Challenges Return to top Russia is a geographically vast market, spanning nine time zones and encompassing over 17 million square miles. Seriously underdeveloped infrastructure poses logistical challenges, especially in accessing markets outside of major cities. An incomplete transition from central planning has led to an insufficiently integrated economy and disparities in wealth distribution, geographically and demographically. Conducting business may be impeded by: burdensome regulatory regimes; inadequate IPR protection and enforcement; extensive corruption and inadequate rule of law; inconsistent application of laws and regulations; lack of transparency; and the continued presence of large state-owned or controlled enterprises in strategic sectors of the economy. Recent reforms make it easier for companies to hire expatriate employees, but the Russian immigration and visa system requires time and patience for business travelers to obtain necessary permissions to do business in Russia. English is not widely spoken, although knowledge of the language is expanding, especially in the major cities. Market Opportunities Return to top In alphabetical order: Agricultural Equipment Apparel Automotive Parts and Service Equipment / Accessories Aviation Chemicals / Plastics Construction Consumer Electronics Electric Power Generation & Transmission Equipment Energy Efficiency / Green build Medical Equipment Refinery Equipment Safety and Security Equipment Travel and Tourism to the U.S. Market Entry Strategy Return to top Developing business in Russia is resource intensive, requiring serious commitments of time, personnel and capital. Conduct market research, such as with the U.S. Commercial Service’s Gold Key or International Partner Search services, to identify opportunities and potential Russian business partners. Conduct due diligence, such as with the U.S. Commercial Service’s International Company Profile service, to ascertain the reliability of business partners. 3 Consult with U.S. companies already in the market, as well as with the U.S. Commercial Service and business organizations, such as the American Chamber of Commerce and U.S. - Russia Business Council. Communicate regularly with Russian business partners to ensure common understanding of expectations. Frequent travel to Russia is strongly recommended to establish and maintain relationships with partners and to understand changing market conditions. Maintain a long-term timeframe to implement plans and achieve positive results. Return to table of contents 4 Return to table of contents Chapter 2: Political and Economic Environment For background information on the political and economic environment of the country, please click on the link below to the U.S. Department of State Background Notes. http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/3183.htm Return to table of contents 5 Return to table of contents Chapter 3: Selling U.S. Products and Services Using an Agent or Distributor Establishing an Office Franchising Direct Marketing Joint Ventures/Licensing Selling to the Government Distribution and Sales Channels Selling Factors/Techniques Electronic Commerce Trade Promotion and Advertising Pricing Sales Service/Customer Support Protecting Your Intellectual Property Due Diligence Local Professional Services Web Resources Using an Agent or Distributor Return to top Encompassing nine time zones, Russia is the largest country in the world by landmass. Therefore, many businesses tend to approach the Russian market on a regional basis. Most new entrants start in Moscow and then move into the regions either through an existing distributor or by seeking new distributors in those locales. As both Moscow and St. Petersburg are major population and business centers, many Western firms have representatives there. Some companies have successfully entered the Russian market by starting distribution in other key regions first because of market features and industry sector concentrations (e.g., woodworking in northwest Russia, energy projects in Sakhalin and western Siberia) and then expanding elsewhere. Well-organized distribution channels are established in western Russia, especially in Moscow and St. Petersburg, and continue to develop rapidly in southern Russia, the Volga region, Urals, Siberia and Russian Far East. To succeed in Russia, it is important to choose sales targets and distributors carefully. U.S. companies have four basic options when choosing a distribution channel: 1) Agents It is not a common practice in Russia for foreign companies to rely solely upon the services of an agent. Distributors and representative offices, however, often employ agents in the Russian regions in order to promote their products. 2) Distributors The most common market entry strategy is to select a good distributor or several distributors (depending on the product). U.S. companies can consider a variety of national, regional and local distribution alternatives. In some product categories (e.g., 6 apparel, cosmetics, packaged foods, alcoholic beverages, consumer electronics, and household appliances), foreign suppliers can choose from a growing number of established distributors. A good distributor will typically sell and deliver foreign suppliers’ products to end-users and/or the retail market and provide a wide range of logistical support, i.e., customs clearance, warehousing, inventory management, etc. However, handling promotion and advertising campaigns exclusively through independent distributors can often produce disappointing results. Russian distributors normally handle products from multiple suppliers and are not typically dedicated to promoting a specific company’s product unless the supplier provides substantial support for promotion and advertising. Russia’s retail law also limits some types of promotional activities. 3) Representative/Branch Offices Some foreign manufacturers, in addition to using distributors, have established their own representative offices. The major advantage of opening a representative office is that foreign companies have more direct contact with their end-users and control over the promotion and distribution of their products. However, under the Russian Civil Code, such offices cannot be directly involved in commercial activity. Instead, they typically oversee a network of distributors and/or agents that perform commercial functions. This approach affords greater control by the foreign supplier over the distribution process and helps
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Program of the Forum
    0 DAY 1 DECEMBER 4, 2017 Project 28.11.2017 "REFERENCE ZONES: REGIONAL MODELS AND ____________ THE ROLE OF THE STATE" December, 4 10.00-12.00 PLENARY SESSION ________________ Hall 3 In 2017 the Russian Government approved a new version of the state program “Social and Economic Development of the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation” and also a draft federal law "On Supporting Development Zones in the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation" is under development. It is assumed that the main mechanism for the development of the Arctic region will be the support zones, which envisage the development of the territory as an integral project on the principle of ensuring the interconnection of all sectoral activities at the planning, goal-setting, financing and realization stages. Implementation of pilot projects for the direct creation of support zones is scheduled for 2018-2020, and their operation for 2021-2025. Within the framework of the plenary session, it is planned to discuss the readiness of the Arctic regions to launch and operate the reference zones, as well as coordinate the activities of federal and regional authorities in this process. Issues for discussion: Presentation of the project of the Kola support zone Presentation of the project of the Archangelsk support zone Presentation of the project of the Nenets support zone Presentation of the project of the Yamalo-Nenets support zone Presentation of the project of the Vorkuta support zone Presentation of the project of the Taimyr-Turukhansk support zone Presentation of the project
    [Show full text]
  • Governing the Arctic
    Arctic Review on Law and Politics Peer-reviewed article Vol. 10, 2019, pp. 190–216 Governing the Arctic: The Russian State Commission for Arctic Development and the Forging of a New Domestic Arctic Policy Agenda Helge Blakkisrud Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI) Abstract After a period of relative neglect in the 1990s and early 2000s, the Arctic is back on the agenda of the Russian authorities. To ensure efficient coordination and implementation of its Arctic strategy, the government in 2015 established a State Commission for Arctic Development. It was to serve as a platform for coordinating the implementation of the government’s ambitious plans for the Arctic, for exchange of information among Arctic actors, and for ironing out interagency and interregional conflicts. Based on a case study of the State Commission for Arctic Devel- opment, this article has a twofold goal. First, it explores the current Russian domestic Arctic agenda, mapping key actors and priorities and examining the results achieved so far. Second, it discusses what this case study may tell us the about policy formulation and implementation in Russia today. We find that while the government’s renewed focus on the Arctic Zone has yielded some impressive results, the State Commission has been at best a mixed success. The case study demonstrates how, in the context of authoritarian modernization, the Russian government strug- gles to come up with effective and efficient institutions for Arctic governance. Moreover, the widespread image of a Russian governance model based on a strictly hierarchic “power vertical” must be modified. Russia’s Arctic policy agenda is characterized by infighting and bureaucratic obstructionism: even when Putin intervenes personally, achieving the desired goals can prove difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Soviet States Two Decades of Transition & Transformation
    Post-Soviet States Two Decades of Transition & Transformation Post-Soviet States Two Decades of Transition & Transformation Editors Ajay Patnaik Tulsiram KNOWLEDGE WORLD KW Publishers Pvt Ltd New Delhi 2011 BEST PUBLISHERS AWARD (ENGLISH) KNOWLEDGE WORLD KW Publishers Pvt Ltd 4676/21, First Floor, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi 110002 Email: [email protected] Tel.: +91.11.23263498/43528107 www.kwpub.com All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing. ISBN 978-93-81904-20-6 © 2012, Ajay Patnaik and Tulsiram Published by Kalpana Shukla, KW Publishers Pvt Ltd 4676/21, First Floor, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi 110002 Printed and bound in India Contents Contributors ix Introduction xiii Section I Understanding Transition and Transformation in Post-Soviet States 1. Continuity and Change in Russia 3 James V. Wertsch 2 Transition to Uncertainty: The Dynamics of Post-Communist Politics 15 R.R. Sharma 3. Transforming the Post-Soviet Space: Customs Union and Eurasian Integration 23 Ajay Patnaik 4. Models in Transition: The Turkish Model and Central Asia Twenty Years After 31 Anita Sengupta 5. The Russian Perspective of Post-Soviet Transformation: Some Dimensions and Problems 51 A.K. Alikberov Section II Economic and Political Transformation 1. Energy and Economy of Russia 61 R.G.Gidadhubli 2. Republic of Belarus: Economic Transition and Transformation 71 Viachaslau Menkouski 3 What are the effects of 2007-09 Global Economic Crises on Turkmenistan’s Economy 77 Sofiya Yuvshanova vi POST-SOVIET states: TWO DECADES OF TRANSITION & TRANSFOrmatiON 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Business in (Insert Country Name Here)
    Doing Business in Russia: 2013 Country Commercial Guide for U.S. Companies INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT, U.S. & FOREIGN COMMERCIAL SERVICE AND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 2010. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES. • Chapter 1: Doing Business in Russia • Chapter 2: Political and Economic Environment • Chapter 3: Selling U.S. Products and Services • Chapter 4: Leading Sectors for U.S. Export and Investment • Chapter 5: Trade Regulations, Customs and Standards • Chapter 6: Investment Climate • Chapter 7: Trade and Project Financing • Chapter 8: Business Travel • Chapter 9: Contacts, Market Research and Trade Events • Chapter 10: Guide to Our Services 1 6/19/2013 Return to table of contents Chapter 1: Doing Business in Russia • Market Overview • Market Challenges • Market Opportunities • Market Entry Strategy • Market Fact Sheet Link Market Overview Return to top • With a vast landmass, extensive natural resources, more than 140 million consumers, a growing middle class, and almost unlimited infrastructure needs, Russia remains one of the most promising and exciting markets for U.S. exporters. • Russia is the world’s 11th largest economy by nominal gross domestic product (GDP) and 7th largest by purchasing power parity (PPP). It has the highest per capita GDP ($13,400) of the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa). Russia is an upper middle income country, with a highly educated and trained workforce and sophisticated, discerning consumers. • Russia’s economy is still recovering from the economic crisis that began in 2008, with GDP growth estimated at 2.8% for 2013. • In terms of trade in goods, Russia was the United States’ 27th largest export market and the 16th largest exporter to the United States in 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia 2008. REGIONS and REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
    Part 5. REGIONS AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT 5.1 Dmitri Medvedev and governors’ corps: priorities in cadre policy 5.2 Territorial management and prospects of reform of the President’s envoys institution 5.3. Reform of local self-government: achievements, problems and prospects of changes 5.4. Trends and prospects of economic development of Russian regions 5.1 Dmitri Medvedev and governors’ corps: priorities in cadre policy A specific feature of cadre decision-making in the sphere of regional policy is the non-public character of the process. Since Dmitri Medvedev took the office of the head of the state, the information coverage of this direction of federal policy decreased considerably (compared to the presidency period of Vladimir Putin). Informal mechanisms (consultations in the Presidential Administration) still have the dominant role in cadre issue solution; however, they mostly affect the federal power level. The role of envoys’ has been levelled down: in accordance with the President’s amendments to the legislation the right to nominate candidates to be vested with powers of heads of executive power of constituent entities of the Federation was passed to the political party dominating (by election results) the legislative assembly of a certain region. The new norm will ensure political dividends mostly for “United Russia” dominating regional bodies of legislative power (as of 9th February 2009 the exceptions were only the parliaments of the Vladimir region and the Nenets Autonomous District). The “UR” federal leadership can join the cadre selection process; however, so far there are no grounds to assert that “UR” has got an effective opportunity of lobbying appointment of party members to governor positions.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda of the 4 International Forum On
    AGENDA OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND ENERGY DEVELOPMENT ENES 2015 Draft dated October 06, 2015 Period Events 9.00-10.00 Registration, collection of guests Thursday, November 19 10.00-11.30 Plenary session - Forum opening ceremony Amphitheater “International cooperation: towards energy efficient economy and development of power-engineering” Participants: Alexander Novak, Minister of Energy of the Russian Federation Sergey Sobyanin, the Mayor of Moscow Herman Gref, Chairperson of the Board, Sberbank of Russia, OJSC Brian Molefe, Group Chif Executive for Eskon Rodney John Allam, The Global Energy Prize and The Nobel Prize Laureate, The Global Energy Prize International Award Committee Chairman Adnan Amin, General Director of the International Renewable Energy Agency IRENA The plenary session will host The Energy of Youth Award Ceremony. The Energy of Youth is an All- Russian contest for young scientists managed by The Global Energy Non-Profit Partnership. 10.00-11.30 Meeting of Managers of Unified Information and Settlement Centers Green Hall To facilitate calculating and reviewing utility charges, provide information follow-up on municipal charges, facilitate accounting and collection of charges for using residential and non-residential space, and other utility charges and their sharing and make those most convenient for country citizens, Unified Information and Settlement Centers have been organized in the RF regions (UI&SC). Consolidating huge volumes of information on charges, payments and debts requires building a high-quality unified database that would provide a transparent scheme of charging for housing/municipal services. UI&SC systems should present a convenient and socially focused system of payments for residents and reduce time and money spent on data processing and informing charge payers.
    [Show full text]
  • At the Margins: Political Change and Indigenous Self-Determination in Post-Soviet Chukotka
    At the Margins: Political Change and Indigenous Self-Determination in Post-Soviet Chukotka Gary N. Wilson & Jeffrey J. Kormos Since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the Russian North has undergone a profound process of political, economic and social change. Nowhere is this change more evident than in the Chukotskii Autonomous Okrug (Chukotka), one of the most remote regions in the Russian Federation. During the Soviet period, Chukotka was the recipient of considerable state support which, in turn, led to the economic development of the region and an influx of settlers from other parts of the Soviet Union. These developments, however, quickly overwhelmed the indigenous peoples of Chukotka, who became marginalized economically, politically and demographically. The post-Soviet period has brought new and unprecedented changes to Chukotka and its inhabitants. In the 1990s, the decline in state support triggered an economic collapse and an out-migration of non-indigenous settlers. Although the economic situation stabilized in the 2000s under the governorship of Roman Abramovich, a powerful oligarch with links to the upper echelons of Russian state authority, the region still struggles to cope with the challenges facing northern regions in Russia and throughout the circumpolar world: remoteness, harsh environments, underdevelopment, size and a dependency on government support. The fate of Chukotka’s indigenous peoples in this changing context has been mixed. Developments during the earlier stages of the transition rebalanced the demographic profile of the region, increasing the proportion of indigenous inhabitants in relation to the settler population, and provided some avenues for greater political autonomy, cultural regeneration and international collaboration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Revival of Russia's Gubernatorial Elections
    RUSSIAN ANALYTICAL DIGEST No. 139, 18 November 2013 9 ANALYSIS The Revival of Russia’s Gubernatorial Elections: Liberalization or Potemkin Reform? J. Paul Goode, Norman, Oklahoma Abstract After an eight year pause, gubernatorial elections returned to Russia in 2012. Formerly appointed gover- nors are now being put to the electoral test, and the Kremlin is discovering the extent to which it sacrificed effective regional leadership for loyalty to the federal center. It now finds itself on the horns of a dilemma: if it continues to heap blame on regional leaders for economic failures and declining trust in the country’s political institutions, then the ranks of volunteers willing to serve as governor will dwindle. Yet if it seeks to attract capable candidates to stand for governor, it may be forced to decentralize power and to allow an opening of regional elections to more opposition candidates. Retreat and Retrenchment local government means that opposition candidates still Despite then-President Dmitrii Medvedev’s notorious face an uphill battle in securing the minimum number claim that it would be at least 100 years before guberna- of signatures to be registered. This point was made viv- torial elections would be restored in Russia, the mass pro- idly clear in the September 2013 elections in Moscow tests following the State Duma election in 2011 prompted and Moscow oblast’, in which incumbents Sergei Sobi- their return ahead of schedule. While this was an out- anin and Andrei Vorob’ev (respectively) mobilized local wardly liberalizing move, the new legislation permitting deputies to ensure the registration of opposition candi- gubernatorial elections (Federal’nyi Zakon N 40-FZ, May dates Aleksei Naval’nyi and Gennadyi Gudkov.
    [Show full text]
  • Mining in Russia Braving the Bear
    Mining in Russia Braving the Bear TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction.....................................................p50 This report was researched and prepared by Global Growth Drivers.................................................p53 Business Reports (www.gbreports.com) for Engineering Equipment.......................................................p56 & Mining Journal. Editorial researched and written Interview with Roman Kopin, Governor of the by Oliver Cushing, Katya Koryakovtseva, Patricia Chukotka Autonomous Region............................p58 Matey Garcia and Madeleine Furuvald. For further Services...........................................................p59 information, contact [email protected] Cover photo: Inside the shaft. Photo courtesy of Shaftproject. A REPORT BY GBR FOR E&MJ FEBRUARY 2012 MINING IN RUSSIA MINING IN RUSSIA often do not. “The mining community it- As a pre-condition to applying for a min- self has a fairer perception than investors, ing license, the applicant must have their re- wherein the problem lies. Investors have serves calculation vetted by the State Com- Mining in Russia seen things happen in Russia, not neces- mission for Mineral Reserves (the GKZ). In sarily in mining, and label it as a dangerous most cases the explorer will have to com- Russia is the world’s largest country and correspondingly rich in minerals. place to go. Some miners have left or refuse mission a JORC or NI 31-101 compliant to come here for reasons that we cannot ex- resource calculation from an external con- Yet, even today, investment capital for the mining industry is insufficient. plain. We are proof that you can make a sultant for internal purposes or in order to se- success of it out here and that there is sup- cure external funding. GKZ is not compatible port for foreign miners.
    [Show full text]
  • Libman Kozlov Schultz Roving Bandit
    Roving Bandits in Action: Outside Option and Governmental Predation in Autocracies by Alexander Libman Frankfurt School of Finance & Management and Russian Academy of Sciences Vladimir Kozlov Higher School of Economics and Russian Academy of Sciences and André Schultz Frankfurt School of Finance & Management The paper investigates the influence of outside options on the predatory behavior of autocrats. An outside option is referred to as the opportunity of an incumbent ruler to continue his career outside his current territory of control. The paper uses data on the effectiveness of tax collec- tion and the repressiveness of tax jurisprudence for Russian regions in 2007-2009 and finds that regions ruled by governors with substantial outside options are characterized by more repressive behavior of tax authorities. However, surprisingly, the same tax authorities collect less additional revenues for the public budget. It conjectures that the presence of an outside option induces autocrats to behave like “roving bandits”: they use tax audits to establish con- trol over regional companies, but exploit this control to extract private rents rather than reve- nues for the regional budget used for public goods provision. February 2012 Keywords: roving and stationary bandit, tax auditing, predatory government, Russian federal- ism JEL: D72, D73, H77, P26 Preliminary version: please do not cite or quote without permission! Acknowledgements: The authors appreciate the very helpful comments of the participants of the seminar on Russian law at the University of Helsinki. All mistakes remain our own. 1 1. Introduction While in democracies elections and multiple veto players are supposed to be able to restrict governmental predation, in non-democratic states predatory behavior is more likely.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia: 2011 Country Commercial Guide for U.S
    Doing Business in Russia: 2011 Country Commercial Guide for U.S. Companies INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT, U.S. & FOREIGN COMMERCIAL SERVICE AND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 2010. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES. • Chapter 1: Doing Business In Russia • Chapter 2: Political and Economic Environment • Chapter 3: Selling U.S. Products and Services • Chapter 4: Leading Sectors for U.S. Export and Investment • Chapter 5: Trade Regulations, Customs and Standards • Chapter 6: Investment Climate • Chapter 7: Trade and Project Financing • Chapter 8: Business Travel • Chapter 9: Contacts, Market Research and Trade Events • Chapter 10: Guide to Our Services Return to table of contents Chapter 1: Doing Business in Russia • Market Overview • Market Challenges • Market Opportunities • Market Entry Strategy Market Overview Return to top • With over 140 million consumers, a growing middle class, and almost unlimited infrastructure needs, Russia remains one of the most promising markets for U.S. exporters. • Russia is the world’s 11th largest economy and has the highest per capita GDP ($15,900) of the BRIC countries. It is an upper middle income country, with a highly educated workforce and sophisticated, discerning consumers. • Russia’s economy has begun to recover from the economic crisis that started in 2008, with GDP growth at 4.0% for 2010. This growth was slightly less than anticipated due to drought and wildfires, which disrupted agriculture, commerce and industry. Economists forecast real GDP growth of 4.3% in 2011. • Russia was the U.S.’s 37th largest export market and the 17th largest exporter to the U.S. in 2010. U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors of Competitiveness in Russian Gubernatorial Elections, 2012-2018 Abstract
    Vladimir Kozlov, Maria Snegovaya FACTORS OF COMPETITIVENESS IN RUSSIAN GUBERNATORIAL ELECTIONS, 2012-2018 ABSTRACT Recently, the Russian regions have attracted a lot of experts’ attention. In light of stagnating economy, public dissatisfaction with the federal policies has become particularly pronounced in the regions (which tend to be poorer than Moscow), as demonstrated by Kremlin’s failures to elect several of its candidates to the positions of regional governors in 2018. Will the Kremlin’s failures at the regional level continue this year? To answer this question, we carry out a qualitative and quantitative analysis of factors that have contributed to victories by the pro-Kremlin candidates in gubernatorial elections that took place in 2012-2018. The regression analysis based on the data regarding these elections shows that the percentage of the vote gained by the pro-Kremlin candidates positively correlates with a higher turnout (which can point to a higher possibility of election fraud) and the support for Vladimir Putin in the most recent presidential election. The key finding of our analysis is the correlation between the dynamics of real disposable incomes and the voting for the pro-Kremlin candidates, which hasn’t been earlier registered by similar studies. As social and economic situation in Russia continues to deteriorate, this correlation can be expected to become increasingly stronger. The results of our analysis suggest that the population’s declining real incomes can lead to a substantial increase in electoral risks facing the Kremlin at the regional level. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Vladimir Kozlov is a specialist in economic geography and analyst of electoral processes.
    [Show full text]