ANNUAL REPORT 2018-2019 HELPLINE: +44 845 868 2708 [email protected]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ANNUAL REPORT 2018-2019 HELPLINE: +44 845 868 2708 Aca@Wsp.Com 39 144 14 54 23 ANNUAL REPORT 2018-2019 HELPLINE: +44 845 868 2708 [email protected] The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Airports Council International Europe concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city of area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Photos: copyright belongs to the airport(s) listed in the captions (when applicable). TABLE OF CONTENTS Welcome to the Annual Report 4 1 Executive summary 6 2 The global context 8 What is Airport Carbon Accreditation? 8 10 years of Airport Carbon Accreditation 14 How is Airport Carbon Accreditation governed? 16 What are the benefits from accreditation? 18 3 Trends 20 Global 20 Europe 23 Asia-Pacific 25 North America 27 Latin America & the Caribbean 29 Africa 31 4 Carbon neutrality 33 5 Year 10 programme developments 39 6 Case studies 42 7 Outlook 52 8 Methodology 54 9 Accreditations list 56 WELCOME TO THE ANNUAL REPORT Airport Carbon Accreditation is the global standard for carbon management in the airport industry. The programme was launched in Europe in 2009 and since 2014 it covers all ACI regions. As part of the global efforts in climate mitigation, Airport Carbon Accreditation supports the airport community in reducing its carbon footprint, demonstrating its achievements and sharing knowledge and best practices. The Annual Report, which is published in the fall of each year, covers the previous reporting year (i.e., mid-May to mid-May) and presents the programme’s evolution and achievements. We are very pleased to present this report for programme year 10, which runs from 16 May 2018 to 15 May 2019. The report focuses on key achievements and developments, the most significant global and regional trends, and representative case studies. 2019 marks 10 years since the launch of Airport Carbon Accreditation. Thanks to the close cooperation between airports, verifiers, the Airport Carbon Accreditation team and many other stakeholders, the programme continues to grow, with 37 new airports being accredited, reaching 274 airports in total, and to evolve: Airport Carbon Accreditation introduced new offsetting requirements and recommendations raising the offsetting standards in the airport industry, updated the programme Guidance Document providing additional clarity, and continued exploring avenues to enhance the programme’s alignment with the ambition of the Paris Agreement. Our vision is to maintain the dynamic growth of Airport Carbon Accreditation, engaging airports from all regions in carbon reduction efforts, while keeping the programme aligned with evolving scientific and political developments in relation to climate change. 4 Our“ vision is to maintain the dynamic growth of Airport Carbon Accreditation, engaging airports from all regions in carbon reduction efforts. ” LA REUNION ROLAND GARROS AIRPORT / RUN 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 274 accredited airports 37 new accreditations 16% growth since the previous year 43% of passengers welcomed by accredited airports 68 number of countries with accredited airports 49 accredited airports upgrading to a more stringent level of accreditation -322,297 TONNES (- 4.9%) aggregate scope 1 & 2 CO2e absolute emissions reductions from airports at all levels KGS -0.09 (- 4.3%) scope 1 & 2 CO2e relative emissions reductions per passenger from airports at all levels 50 carbon neutral airports -710,673 TONNES of CO2e offset 6 144 in Europe 39 54 in North America in Asia-Pacific 14 23 in Africa in Latin America & Caribbean 89 Level 1 I Mapping 77 Level 2 I Reduction 58 Level 3 I Optimisation 50 Level 3+ I Neutrality QUEEN ALIA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT / AMM 2 THE GLOBAL CONTEXT In October 2018, the Intergovernmental Panel on operations, for instance floods at Kansai, Hong Kong Climate Change (IPCC) released a Special Report and Cochin airports in 2018. These events make on “Global Warming of 1.5oC”, concluding that climate change particularly tangible for the aviation business-as-usual climate policy would lead to a sector and highlight even more the importance of 3°C temperature increase by the end of the century, bold climate action. It also means that in addition with catastrophic consequences. Limiting global to mitigation efforts, an increasing attention to warming to 1.5°C would require “unprecedented” the adaptation to climate change is required, as and “deep emissions reductions in all sectors” highlighted by the 2018 ACI World Policy Brief – and a decrease in global CO2 emissions “well Airport’s Resilience and Adaptation to a Changing before 2030”. Overall, global net CO2 emissions Climate. would need to decline by about 45% by 2030 compared to 2010, reaching net zero by 2050. Against the background of new scientific findings, These findings have confirmed the importance of extreme weather events and societal value change, a rigorous implementation of international climate it is all the more important that airport operators instruments, in particular the Paris Agreement, due worldwide continue making efforts to reduce their to enter into force as of 2020, and for international emissions and where possible, enhance them. In aviation emissions, ICAO’s Carbon Offsetting particular, this means exploring opportunities to and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation support emissions reductions from airlines and other (CORSIA) under which emissions reporting by stakeholders airports interact with, building on their aircraft operators has already started. role of interface between a variety of different actors from and beyond the aviation sector. For Airport In addition to CORSIA, the aviation sector is Carbon Accreditation, this implies evolving in a way continuously working on reducing its emissions that encourages and recognises such increased through more efficient aircraft technologies, the ambition, while continuing addressing the needs improvement of operational procedures and use of airports that are in the beginning of their carbon of sustainable aviation fuels. Due to the increasing management journey. air transport demand, these achievements have, however, so far not reversed the trend of growth What is Airport Carbon Accreditation? in absolute aviation emissions. This leads to an unprecedented pressure on the aviation sector Airport Carbon Accreditation is the global standard to step up its climate action, with its social and for carbon management in the airport industry. The economic benefits being questioned in some aim is to encourage and enable airports to implement countries – for instance, with the emergence of best practices in carbon management. It has been a “flying shame” movement in Europe, calling to developed in line with international standards, stop flying in order to save the planet. including the Greenhouse Gas Protocol and ISO 14064, and is reviewed and updated accordingly as At the same time, the increasing frequency of these standards evolve. The programme focuses on extreme weather events over the last years has CO2 emissions, as they comprise the large majority also directly impacted aviation infrastructure and of airport emissions, while independent verification 8 ensures the programme’s credibility. Airports can LEVEL 3 become accredited at four progressively ambitious Optimisation requires fulfilment of all level 2 levels of accreditation. accreditation requirements, development of a more extensive carbon footprint to include specific scope LEVEL 1 3 emissions and the formulation of a Stakeholder Mapping requires a policy commitment to Engagement Plan to promote wider airport-based emissions reduction endorsed by top management emissions’ reductions. and the development of a carbon footprint for emissions under the airport’s control (i.e., scope 1 LEVEL 3+ & 2 emissions). Neutrality requires fulfilment of all level 3 accreditation requirements and offsetting of residual LEVEL 2 emissions under the airport’s control that cannot be Reduction requires the fulfilment of all level 1 reduced. accreditation requirements, formulation of a carbon emissions reduction target, development of a Figure 1 presents the main accreditation Carbon Management Plan to achieve the target and requirements and Figure 2 an indicative classification annual reduction of emissions under the airport’s of the main airport related emissions. control (i.e., scope 1 & 2 emissions) versus the three-year rolling average. FIGURE 1: MAIN REQUIREMENTS OF AIRPORT CARBON ACCREDITATION Airport Carbon Accreditation I Annual Report 2018-2019 9 FIGURE 2: INDICATIVE CLASSIFICATION OF AIRPORT RELATED EMISSIONS 10 Airport Carbon Accreditation I Annual Report 2018-2019 11 FIGURE 3: AIRPORT CARBON ACCREDITATION MILESTONES YEAR 5 (2013/2014) YEAR 1 Extension to the (2009/2010) YEAR 3 African region (2011/2012) Launched in Europe Extension to the Asia-Pacific region 17 43 59 84 102 YEAR 2 (2010/2011) YEAR 4 (2012/2013) 12 YEAR 9 (2017/2018) YEAR 7 (2015/2016) 125 156 189 237 274 YEAR 6 YEAR 10 (2014/2015) (2018/2019) Extension to the North American 2019 marks 10 years and the Latin American & the since the launch of Airport Caribbean regions YEAR 8 Carbon Accreditation. New (2016/2017) offsetting requirements and recommendations were introduced raising the offsetting standards in the airport industry. 49 airports upgraded to a more demanding accreditation level; marking the highest rate of upgrades since the programme’s launch. There are 50 carbon neutral airports across the world. Airport
Recommended publications
  • WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP 18Th UNDERWATER PHOTOGRAPHY 4Th UNDERWATER VIDEO PORTO SANTO, MADEIRA ISLANDS / PORTUGAL SPECIFIC RULES
    Confédération Mondiale des Activités Subaquatiques World Underwater Federation WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP 18th UNDERWATER PHOTOGRAPHY 4th UNDERWATER VIDEO 04-09 October 2021 PORTO SANTO, MADEIRA ISLANDS / PORTUGAL SPECIFIC RULES 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 These Specific Rules apply to the 18º CMAS Underwater Photography World Championship, and the 4º CMAS Underwater Video World Championship will be held on the Island of Porto Santo, Madeira Islands, Portugal, from Monday 04 October to Saturday 09 October 2021, six days event. 1.2 The event is organized by the Portuguese Underwater Federation (Federação Portuguesa de Actividades Subaquáticas – FPAS) by the constitution of the Local Organization Committee (LOC) under the supervision of the CMAS Sports Committee and the CMAS Visual Commission. 1.3 The LOC is contituted by the Portuguese Underwater Federation (Federação Portuguesa de Actividades Subaquáticas – FPAS) and the Swimming Association of Madeira (Associação de Natação da Madeira – ANM). 1.4 During the Championship, the CMAS General Rules World Championships Version 2021/1 and Specific Rules will be applied. 1.5 In case of differences in interpretation of the Specific Rules, the CMAS Underwater Photography and Videography – General Rules, World Championships, CMAS Championships Organization Procedures & Obligations and other CMAS Rules apply the order of importance. 2 PARTICIPATION AND ENTRY 2.1 All member federations affiliated to CMAS with or without a vote and from any committee affiliated can propose a team. They have to return no later than 01 May 2021 the entry form for the Championship (enclosure A) to CMAS with a copy sent to the organizing Federation: [email protected] 2.2 Each Federation or association can propose maximum a: 2.2.1 total team of five persons for photography, including two photographers, two assistants and one captain, and 2.2.2 total team of five persons for video, including two videographers, two assistants and one captain.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on State Asset Management in the EU
    Study on State asset management in the EU Final study report for Pillar 2 – Portugal Contract: ECFIN/187/2016/740792 Written by KPMG and Bocconi University February 2018 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs Directorate Fiscal policy and policy mix and Directorate Investment, growth and structural reforms European Commission B-1049 Brussels 2 Portugal This Country fiche presents a quantitative overview of the mix of non-financial assets owned by the Portuguese General government. A recap and a summary table on sources of data and valuation methods used to map and assess (as far as possible) non-financial assets owned by the Portuguese General government is reported in the Appendix (Table C). 1. OVERVIEW OF NON-FINANCIAL ASSETS In 2015, the estimated value of Non-financial assets owned by the Portuguese General government was equal to 119.6 Eur Bn, accounting for about 82.9% of the estimated value of all assets (including Financial assets) owned by the General government1. Figure 1 General government’s Financial and Non-financial assets (Eur Bn), Portugal, 2015 Source: KPMG elaboration. Data on Gross Domestic Product were directly retrivied from Eurostat on 19th September 2017. (1) Estimated values refer to 2015 as the latest available year for both financial assets and all clusters of non-financial assets. (2) In this chart, the “estimated value” of financial assets is reported in terms of Total Assets of the country’s PSHs as weighted by the stake(s) owned by the Public sector into the PSHs themselves2. (3) Values of Dwellings, and Buildings other than dwellings were directly retrieved from Eurostat, while values for other Non-financial assets were estimated according to the valuation approaches explained in the Methodological Notes for Pillar 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Performance Report 2020 Environmental Performance Report 2020
    ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2020 ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2020 01 07 INTRODUCTION WASTE 02 08 NOISE BIODIVERSITY 03 09 AIR QUALITY ENVIRONMENTAL 04 MANAGEMENT OF VOLUNTARY CARBON CONSTRUCTION WORK MANAGEMENT 10 05 RAISING ENVIRONMENTAL ENERGY AWARENESS 06 11 WATER CONCLUSIONS 2 53 ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2020 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION This document presents the company's main environmental performance results of 2020 and aims to inform ANA's main stakeholders and the general public. ANA – Aeroportos de Portugal, SA (ANA) seeks continuous improvement in its environmental performance and, to this end, the company has an Integrated Management System that takes the Environmental component into account. It defines the priority actions due to the environmental impacts arising from the activity, setting out strategic action goals, which include efficient consumption of energy and water, monitoring and reducing greenhouse gas emissions, controlling potentially pollutant emissions, land use and water resource management, promoting the reduction, reuse and recycling of waste, noise management and biodiversity conservation. 3 53 ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2020 CHART 1 CHANGES IN TRAFFIC UNITS AT ANA AIRPORTS BETWEEN 2019 AND 2020 2020 was a year marked by the 0.0 COVID–19 pandemic and its effects -10.0 on society as a whole, including the -20.0 world aviation sector as a result of the -30.0 substantial reduction in traffic compared -47% -40.0 -2.8% to the previous year (Chart 1). -68.8% -64.4% -75.6% -63.2% -44.1% -61.6% -64,4% -66,7% -50.0 -60.0 -70.0 -80.0 AHD ASC AFR ABJ AJPII ASM AHR AFL AM APS AHD - Humberto Delgado Airport, in Lisbon; ASC - Francisco Sá Carneiro Airport, in Porto ; AFR - Faro Airport; ABJ - Beja Airport; AJPII - João Paulo II Airport, in Ponta Delgada; ASM - Santa Maria Airport; AHR Horta Airport; AFL - Flores Airport; AM - Madeira Airport; APS - Porto Santo Airport; TU – Traffic Unit (1 TU is equivalent to 1 passenger or 100 kg of cargo).
    [Show full text]
  • Charges Guide Airlines.Pdf
    Index 1. Airlines 3 1.1 Price List 4 Humberto Delgado Airport Porto Airport Faro Airport Beja Airport Azores Airports Madeira Airports 1.2 Charge Description 15 1.3 Regulatory Framework 19 1.4 Incentives 21 2. Billing and Payment Charges 80 3. Glossary 82 4. Contacts 84 Charges Guide Airlines IMPORTANT: This document is issued for information purposes only, providing a quick reference to the charges applied in airports under ANA´s responsibility. Updated: 6 of March 2019 1. Airlines 1.1 Price List 1.2 Charge Description 1.3 Regulatory Framework 1.4 Incentives Charges Guide Airlines 1.1 Price List Aircraft using the airport are subject to the following charges, exclusive of VAT (Value Added Tax). Humberto Delgado Airport CHARGES 11 Jan – 6 Mar 7 Mar - Dec 1. LANDING/TAKE-OFF Aircrafts up to 25 tonnes, per tonne € 6.34 € 6.45 Aircrafts 25 to 75 tonnes, per tonne above 25 tonnes € 7.54 € 7.68 Aircrafts 75 to 150 tonnes, per tonne above 75 tonnes € 8.86 € 9.02 Aircrafts over 150 tonnes, per tonne above 150 tonnes € 6.73 € 6.85 Minimum charge per landing € 298.36 € 303.73 2. PARKING Traffic Areas (a): Aircrafts up to 14 tonnes (per 24h or fraction) up to 12h or fraction € 28.07 € 28.58 12h to 24h or fraction € 28.07 € 28.58 24h to 48h or fraction € 70.13 € 71.39 48h to 72h or fraction € 115.52 € 117.60 over 72h or fraction € 166.93 € 169.93 Aircrafts over 14 tonnes (per tonne) up to 12h or fraction € 1.89 € 1.92 12h to 24h or fraction € 1.89 € 1.92 24h to 48h or fraction € 4.71 € 4.79 48h to 72h or fraction € 7.76 € 7.90 over 72h or fraction € 11.23 € 11.43 Surcharge (per 15 minutes or fraction) € 70.83 € 72.10 Air Bridge (GPS included) 1 Air bridge, per minute of use, up to 2 hours € 4.16 € 4.23 1 Air bridge, per minute of use, over 2 hours € 4.96 € 5.05 GPS (Ground Power System) per minute of use € 1.43 € 1.46 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Charges Guide Ana Network
    CHARGES GUIDE ANA NETWORK INDEX 1. GROUND HANDLING OPERATORS 4 1.1 Price List – Ground Handling Charges 5 Lisbon Airport 5 Porto Airport 8 Faro Airport 10 Beja Airport 12 Azores Airports 14 Madeira Airports 16 2. BILLING AND CHARGES PAYMENTS 19 3. CONTACTS 21 Charges Guide IMPORTANT: This document is issued for information purposes only, providing a quick reference to the charges applied in airports under ANA´s responsibility. Updated: 27th of April 2021 3 1. GROUND HANDLING OPERATORS 1.1 Price list – Ground Handling Charges Charges Guide Ground Handling Operators 1.1 Price List – Ground Handling Charges Aircraft using the airport are subject to the following charges. exclusive of VAT (Value Added Tax). Lisbon Airport CHARGES Apr – Dec 2021 1. PASSENGER HANDLING (per check-in desk) Traditional check-in desk and Self-service Drop off For the first four periods of 15 minutes or fraction € 2.04 For the following 15 minutes or fraction € 1.97 Self-baggage drop off (per baggage) €0.33 Per month € 1,690.09 2. BAGGAGE HANDLING Per embarked baggage processed at the sorting baggage system € 0.41 3. GROUND ADMINISTRATION AND SUPERVISION (by aircraft type) 0 < MTOW aircraft (ton) <15 € 0.09 15 ≤ MTOW aircraft (ton) <30 € 0.42 30 ≤ MTOW aircraft (ton) <55 € 0.75 55 ≤ MTOW aircraft (ton) <72 € 1.20 72 ≤ MTOW aircraft (ton) <82 € 1.33 82 ≤ MTOW aircraft (ton) <170 € 1.62 MTOW aircraft (ton) ≥170 € 2.12 4. FREIGHT AND MAIL HANDLING (by traffic unit) Charge € 0.53 5. RAMP HANDLING (by aircraft type) 0 < MTOW aircraft (ton) <15 € 2.36 15 ≤ MTOW aircraft (ton) <30 € 11.07 30 ≤ MTOW aircraft (ton) <55 € 19.42 55 ≤ MTOW aircraft (ton) <72 € 31.27 72 ≤ MTOW aircraft (ton) <82 € 34.45 82 ≤ MTOW aircraft (ton) <170 € 42.05 MTOW aircraft (ton) ≥170 € 55.31 5 Charges Guide Ground Handling Operators 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploratory Analysis on LCC Potential to Influence Airport Efficiency
    Exploratory analysis on LCC potential to influence airport efficiency António Sérgio de Azevedo Domingues Dissertação para obtenção do Grau de Mestre em Complex Transport Infrastructure Systems Júri Presidente: Prof. Dr. Luís Guilherme de Picado Santos Orientador: Prof. Dr. Maria do Rosário Maurício Ribeiro Macário Vogal: Prof. Dr. Paulo Manuel da Fonseca Teixeira July 2011 Abstract The aim of this study is to perform an evaluation of the Portuguese airport infrastructure’s efficiency performance. It will be undertaken an extensive literature review of methodological approaches in airport performance research in order to understand which techniques are the most meaningful to be used in this case study. Then, airport efficiency will be object of study in the different areas that characterize it: airside, landside and within the airport-airline relationship. Finally, we will choose one of the methodologies to perform the analysis of the Portuguese airport efficiency performance in order to withdraw and analyse the results. Keywords: LCC, Airports, DEA, efficiency 1 Acknowledgments I would like to thank Professor Rosário Macário for supervising my thesis dissertation. Moreover, the development of this dissertation would not be as valuable without the contributions of Professor Richard deNeufville’s priceless advices and Professor Carlos Pestana Barros’ support regarding the DEA methodology. In addition, I would like to thank all CTIS’ faculty, lecturers and colleagues, responsible for some of most the interesting discussions I had in the last two years. I am also indebted to ANA’s marketing directors Renata Tavares, Andreia Pavão and Jocelyn Ferreira for their availability in providing useful data. I want to address a special thank you note to Nuno Costa for his personal availability and explanations concerning Lisbon airport’s operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Safetaxi Full Coverage List – 21S5 Cycle
    SafeTaxi Full Coverage List – 21S5 Cycle Australia Australian Capital Territory Identifier Airport Name City Territory YSCB Canberra Airport Canberra ACT Oceanic Territories Identifier Airport Name City Territory YPCC Cocos (Keeling) Islands Intl Airport West Island, Cocos Island AUS YPXM Christmas Island Airport Christmas Island AUS YSNF Norfolk Island Airport Norfolk Island AUS New South Wales Identifier Airport Name City Territory YARM Armidale Airport Armidale NSW YBHI Broken Hill Airport Broken Hill NSW YBKE Bourke Airport Bourke NSW YBNA Ballina / Byron Gateway Airport Ballina NSW YBRW Brewarrina Airport Brewarrina NSW YBTH Bathurst Airport Bathurst NSW YCBA Cobar Airport Cobar NSW YCBB Coonabarabran Airport Coonabarabran NSW YCDO Condobolin Airport Condobolin NSW YCFS Coffs Harbour Airport Coffs Harbour NSW YCNM Coonamble Airport Coonamble NSW YCOM Cooma - Snowy Mountains Airport Cooma NSW YCOR Corowa Airport Corowa NSW YCTM Cootamundra Airport Cootamundra NSW YCWR Cowra Airport Cowra NSW YDLQ Deniliquin Airport Deniliquin NSW YFBS Forbes Airport Forbes NSW YGFN Grafton Airport Grafton NSW YGLB Goulburn Airport Goulburn NSW YGLI Glen Innes Airport Glen Innes NSW YGTH Griffith Airport Griffith NSW YHAY Hay Airport Hay NSW YIVL Inverell Airport Inverell NSW YIVO Ivanhoe Aerodrome Ivanhoe NSW YKMP Kempsey Airport Kempsey NSW YLHI Lord Howe Island Airport Lord Howe Island NSW YLIS Lismore Regional Airport Lismore NSW YLRD Lightning Ridge Airport Lightning Ridge NSW YMAY Albury Airport Albury NSW YMDG Mudgee Airport Mudgee NSW YMER
    [Show full text]
  • 391 Final 2004/0127
    COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 26.5.2004 COM(2004) 391 final 2004/0127 (CNS) Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders . (presented by the Commission) EN EN TABLE OF CONTENTS EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM ......................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction....................................................................................................................... 4 2. Objectives and content of the proposal: from a recasting of the Common Manual to a Community code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders.. 7 3. Choice of legal base ........................................................................................................ 10 4. Subsidiarity and proportionality...................................................................................... 10 5. Consequences of the various protocols annexed to the treaties ...................................... 11 United Kingdom and Ireland........................................................................................... 11 Denmark.......................................................................................................................... 12 Norway and Iceland ........................................................................................................ 12 6. Consequences for the new Member States of the two-stage procedure for implementing instruments building on the Schengen
    [Show full text]
  • 8670/2/00 REV 2 Kea/FC/Jt 1 DG HI COUNCIL OF
    COUNCIL OF Brussels, 28 August 2000 (18.09) THE EUROPEAN UNION (OR. es) 8670/2/00 REV 2 LIMITE FRONT 25 COMIX 410 NOTE from : General Secretar at to : Front ers Working Party No prev. doc. 9945/4/99 REV 4 FR.NT 5 C.0I1 121 Subject : .perat onal nstruct ons for ssuing visas at the border to seamen n trans t who are subject to visa re62 rements Anne8 II: 9 st of deta ls on contact points at border cross ngs Austr a : pages 2 to 6 :elg um : page 7 France : pages 8 to 13 Germany : pages 14 to 19 Greece : page 20 Italy : pages 21 to 26 928embourg : page 27 Netherlands : pages 28 to 30 Portugal : pages 31 to 36 Spa n pages 37 to 42 8670/2/00 REV 2 kea/FC/jt 1 DG H I EN OVERVIEW OF CONTACT POINTS AT BORDER CROSSINGS AUSTRIA AIRPORTS )raz,Thalerhof Gendarmer e :order Dept. Tel: +43-316-291017 8073 Feldkirchen Fa8: +43-316-296227-19 Inns1ruc3,4rane1itten Customs Guard Dept. Tel: +43-512-281719 6020 Innsbruck Fa8: +43-512-281719-12 4lagenfurt,Wörthersee :PD Klagenfurt œ Pol ce Tel: +43-463-41500-312 9020 Klagenfurt Fa8: +43-463-5333-3209 Linz,Hörsching Gendarmer e :order Dept. Tel: +43-7221-644880 4063 Hörsching Fa8: +43-7221-64404 Salz1urg-Maxglan :PD SalAburg œ Pol ce Tel: +43-662-6383-4471 5020 SalAburg Fa8: +43-662-852089 Wien,Schwechat :PD Schwechat œ Pol ce Tel: +43-1-70166-4840 2320 Flughafen Schwechat Fa8: +43-1-70166-4849 AIRFIELD Hohenems,Dorn1irn Gendarmer e post Tel: +43-5576-72034 6845 Hohenems Fa8: +43-5577-72034-4 HARBOUR Wien,Prater3ai :PD W en œ Danube dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Charter Flights Aviation List of Country / How Many Counters Open International Flights After Covid 19
    Charter flights Aviation The Wings of our fly List of country / how many counters open international flights after covid 19 International Flights: List of Countries, Airlines Which Have Started Operations After COVID-19 Lockdown This document not for legal use but just an informative purpose Updates on 10 September, 2020 Afghanistan 53 (10.42%) Show/hide all other international airports 2 Kabul (OAKB) 45 (12.5%) Kandahar (OAKN) 8 (0%) Very few flights observed Albania 149 (-3.87%) Show/hide all other international airports 1 Tirana (LATI) 149 (-3.87%) Algeria 93 (-3.12%) Show/hide all other international airports 18 Adrar (DAUA) No flights observed Charter flights Aviation Wings of Our fly Web site www.charterflightsaviation.com Email [email protected] Best Charter Flights, Helicopter, Turbo Props, Privet Jet, Business Jet, And Seaplane Live Today, Love Tomorrow Charter flights Aviation The Wings of our fly Algiers (DAAG) 14 (-17.65%) Very few flights observed Annaba (DABB) 15 (0%) Batna (DABT) 3 (0%) Very few flights observed Bejaia (DAAE) 12 (0%) Very few flights observed Biskra (DAUB) 3 (0%) Very few flights observed Chlef (DAOI) 4 (0%) Very few flights observed Constantine (DABC) 24 (0%) Djanet (DAAJ) No flights observed Hassi Messaoud (DAUH) No flights observed Jijel (DAAV) No flights observed Oran (DAOO) 3 (0%) Very few flights observed Setif (DAAS) 8 (0%) Very few flights observed Tamanrasset (DAAT) No flights observed Tebessa (DABS) No flights observed Tiaret (DAOB) No flights observed Tlemcen (DAON) 7 (0%)
    [Show full text]
  • ICAO State Action Plan on Emissions Reduction PORTUGAL
    ICAO State Action Plan on Emissions Reduction PORTUGAL August 2018 2 ACTION PLAN - PORTUGAL CONTENTS OVERVIEW 5 1. INTRODUCTION 7 1.A - Common Preamble 7 1.B - Current State of Aviation in Portugal 11 2. SECTION I - Measures Taken Collectively Throughout Europe 19 Including Those Led by the EU 2.A - Executive Summary 19 2.B – ECAC Baseline Scenario and Estimated Benefits of Implemented Measures 25 2.C – Actions Taken Collectively Throughout Europe 35 3. SECTION II – National Actions in Portugal 75 4. CONCLUSION 93 Appendix A – Detailed Results for ECAC Scenarios (Section 2B) 95 List of Abbreviations 99 3 4 ACTION PLAN - PORTUGAL OVERVIEW The present document brings forward the 2018 Portuguese ICAO State Action Plan for CO2 Emissions Reduction, closely following the sector work programmes developed by all of ECAC’s forty-four States, in a full commitment towards the achievement of the global collective goals agreed at the 38th Session of the ICAO Assembly in 2013 and reinforced at 39th Session of the ICAO Assembly. The background of the present action plan emphasizes the major lines on EU environmental policies, based on ICAO’s “Basket of Measures”, mainly: Aircraft- related Technology Development, Alternative Fuels, Improved Air Traffic Management and Infrastructure Use, Economic/Market-Based Measures and Regulatory Measures/Support to Voluntary Actions. The actions, which are undertaken collectively throughout Europe, do represent a comprehensive approach and a global effort in order to support a sustained and sustainable growth in the aviation sector. Portugal participates in some of the most representative projects, as AIRE Campaigns, SESAR or ACI Airport Carbon Accreditation.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Performance Report 2016
    ÍNDICE MOD 064605 03 MOD 064605 Page 1 of 20 AATABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Noise and Air Quality ....................................................................................................................... 4 3. Voluntary Carbon Management ...................................................................................................... 6 4. Energy .............................................................................................................................................. 7 5. Water ............................................................................................................................................... 9 6. Waste ............................................................................................................................................. 11 7. Biodiversity .................................................................................................................................... 13 8. Environmental Management of Works ......................................................................................... 16 9. Environmental Awareness ............................................................................................................. 17 10. Conclusions .................................................................................................................................... 19 MOD 064605 03 MOD 064605
    [Show full text]