ISSN 1559-3096 Davis, M. (2006). “Gray Plagiarism”: A Case from the History of the History of Computing. Plagiary: Cross‐Disciplinary Studies in Plagiarism, Fabrication, and Falsification, 1 (7): 1‐18. A Case of “Gray Plagiarism” from the History of the History of Computing Michael Davis E‐mail:
[email protected] Abstract the discovery? This is a gray area in academic Claiming as one's own what one knows to be ethics. the discovery of another is certainly plagiarism. But what about merely failing to acknowledge the work of another where one does not give the impression While I shall be concerned with this gray area that the discovery is one's own? Does it matter how here, I shall not try to provide a definitive answer easy it was to make the discovery? This paper ana- to the questions just posed. Instead, I shall de‐ lyzes a case in this gray area in academic ethics. scribe what happened when an independent The focus is not on the failure to attribute itself but scholar, believing himself to be the victim of on the attempt of an independent scholar who, be- ʺgray plagiarism”, sought a forum in which to lieving himself to be the victim of "gray plagiarism”, make his complaint. The story could be told from sought a forum in which to make his complaint. The story could be told from several perspectives. I shall several perspectives. I shall tell it primarily from tell it primarily from the perspective of the complain- the perspective of the complainant, an outsider, ant, an outsider, because I believe that way of telling because I believe that way of telling it best re‐ it best reveals the need to think more deeply about veals the need to think more deeply about how how we (acting for the universities to which we be- we (acting for the universities to which we be‐ long) assign credit, especially to scholars outside, long) assign credit, especially to scholars outside, and about how we respond when someone com- and about how we respond when someone com‐ plains of a failure to assign credit.