Reef Life Survey Assessment of Coral Reef Biodiversity in the North -West Marine Parks Network

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reef Life Survey Assessment of Coral Reef Biodiversity in the North -West Marine Parks Network Reef Life Survey Assessment of Coral Reef Biodiversity in the North -west Marine Parks Network Graham Edgar, Camille Mellin, Emre Turak, Rick Stuart- Smith, Antonia Cooper, Dani Ceccarelli Report to Parks Australia, Department of the Environment 2020 Citation Edgar GJ, Mellin C, Turak E, Stuart-Smith RD, Cooper AT, Ceccarelli DM (2020) Reef Life Survey Assessment of Coral Reef Biodiversity in the North-west Marine Parks Network. Reef Life Survey Foundation Incorporated. Copyright and disclaimer © 2020 RLSF To the extent permitted by law, all rights are reserved and no part of this publication covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means except with the written permission of The Reef Life Survey Foundation. Important disclaimer The RLSF advises that the information contained in this publication comprises general statements based on scientific research. The reader is advised and needs to be aware that such information may be incomplete or unable to be used in any specific situation. No reliance or actions must therefore be made on that information without seeking prior expert professional, scientific and technical advice. To the extent permitted by law, The RLSF (including its volunteers and consultants) excludes all liability to any person for any consequences, including but not limited to all losses, damages, costs, expenses and any other compensation, arising directly or indirectly from using this publication (in part or in whole) and any information or material contained in it. Images Cover: RLS diver and Tridacna gigas at Imperieuse Reef by Andrew Green Remaining images: Page ii: Graham Edgar, Western Australia; Page iv: Graham Edgar, Pomacentrus pavo Ashmore Reef; Page viii: Graham Edgar Drone image Clerke Reef, Rowley Shoals; Page 2: Graham Edgar, Ecsenius lividinalis, Ashmore Reef; Page 33: Graham Edgar, Amphiprion ocellaris, Kimberley; Page 35: Graham Edgar, Tridacna gigas, Imperieuse Reef; Page 39 Graham Edgar, Hermit crab, Kimberley; Rear cover: Andrew Green, RLS diver at Mermaid Reef 1 Contents Executive summary .......................................................... vi 1 Introduction ............................................................... 1 2 Methods .................................................................... 3 3 Results ....................................................................... 8 4 Discussion ................................................................31 5 Recommendations ...................................................34 6 Acknowledgements .................................................34 7 References ...............................................................36 Appendices ......................................................................40 Reef Life Survey Assessment of Coral Reef Biodiversity in the North-west Marine Parks Network| iii Figures Figure 1. Stylised representation of method 1 survey technique ..................................................................................................... 4 Figure 2. Stylised representation of method 2 survey technique ..................................................................................................... 4 Figure 3. Map of the Northwest sites surveyed from 2009-2019. Most dots have multiple overlapping sites. ............................... 7 Figure 4. Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) plot of reef fish biomass across all sites surveyed in 2018-2019, performed on the Bray-Curtis similarity matrix of the square-root transformed data, showing (A) site scores and (B) species scores (stress = 0.14). For clarity, species labels are shown for the most abundant species only. ...................................................................................... 9 Figure 5. Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) plot of reef fish biomass across all sites surveyed in 2013 vs 2018, either coded by AMP status (A) or reefs (B), and performed on the Bray-Curtis similarity matrix of the square-root transformed data (stress = 0.21). Species scores are shown in C). For clarity, labels are shown for the most abundant taxa only. ......................................... 10 Figure 6. Biomass in kg and species richness of reef fishes per 500 m2 transect at Ashmore Reef Marine Park, Mermaid Reef Marine Park and reference sites in the North-west bioregion. Error Bars = 1 SE. .......................................................................... 11 Figure 7. Biomass in kg of functional group of reef fishes per 500 m2 transect at Ashmore Reef Marine Park, Mermaid Reef Marine Park and reference sites in the North-west bioregion. Error Bars = 1 SE. .......................................................................... 13 Figure 8. Biomass in kg per 500 m2 transect of large (>20cm TL) reef fishes at Ashmore Reef Marine Parks, Mermaid Reef Marine Parks and reference sites in the North-west bioregion for 2013 and 2018 (top) and all sites surveyed in 2018 (bottom). Error Bars = 1 SE. NTZs are no take zones within multi-zoned parks (distinct from NT, which are stand-alone no-take zones). .. 14 Figure 9. Functional richness of reef fishes and CTI at Ashmore Reef Marine Parks, Mermaid Reef Marine Parks and reference sites in the North-west bioregion. Error Bars = 1 SE. ...................................................................................................................... 15 Figure 10. Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) plot of major benthic categories across Ashmore and Mermaid Reef AMPs and their reference sites, performed on the Bray-Curtis similarity matrix of the square-root transformed data (stress = 0.20). Sites are shown by A) AMP categories and B) individual reefs. Species scores are shown in C). For clarity, labels are shown for the most abundant benthic categories only. ................................................................................................................................................. 17 Figure 11. Percent cover of key benthic categories at Ashmore Reef Marine Parks, Mermaid Reef Marine Parks and reference sites in the North-west bioregion. a) Total live cover, b) number of benthic categories, c) live hard coral cover, d) turf cover, e) crustose coralline algae, and f) macroalgae. Error Bars = 1 SE. ...................................................................................................... 19 Figure 12. Percent cover of most abundant coral genera at Ashmore Reef CMR, Mermaid Reef CMR and reference sites in the North-west bioregion. Error Bars = 1 SE. ........................................................................................................................................ 21 Figure 13. Percent cover of most abundant coral taxa at Ashmore Reef CMR, Mermaid Reef CMR and reference sites in the North-west bioregion. Error Bars = 1 SE. ........................................................................................................................................ 22 Figure 14. Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) plot of invertebrate abundance across all sites surveyed in 2018, coded by reefs (A), and performed on the Bray-Curtis similarity matrix of the square-root transformed data (stress = 0.10). Species scores are shown in C). For clarity, labels are shown for the most abundant taxa only. ................................................................................. 23 Figure 15. Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) plot of mobile invertebrate abundance across all sites surveyed in 2013 vs 2018, either coded by AMP status (A) or reefs (B), and performed on the Bray-Curtis similarity matrix of the square-root transformed data (stress = 0.21). Species scores are shown in C). For clarity, labels are shown for the most abundant taxa only. .................. 25 Figure 16. Abundance and species richness of mobile macroinvertebrates per 500 m2 transect at Ashmore Reef Marine Parks, Mermaid Reef Marine Parks and reference sites in the North-west bioregion. Error Bars = 1 SE. ................................................ 26 Figure 17. Abundance of each phylum of mobile macroinvertebrates per 500 m2 transect at Ashmore Reef Marine Parks, Mermaid Reef Marine Parks and reference sites in the North-west bioregion. Error Bars = 1 SE. ................................................ 28 Figure 18. Abundance and species richness of cryptic fishes per 500 m2 transect at Ashmore Reef Marine Parks, Mermaid Reef Marine Parks and reference sites in the North-west bioregion. Error Bars = 1 SE. ........................................................................ 30 iv | Reef Life Survey Assessment of Coral Reef Biodiversity in the North-west Marine Parks Network Tables Table 1. Permanova test of fish community changes between 2013 and 2018, between reef systems (Mermaid vs. Ashmore), and “IUCN Status” (compares IUCN I-II vs. IUCN IV vs. Reference: Hibernia and Scott Reefs for Ashmore, Clerke and Imperieuse for Mermaid). ................................................................................................................................................................................. 11 Table 2. ANOVA testing differences in the degree of change in fish biomass and species richness from 2013 to 2018 between reef systems (Mermaid vs. Ashmore), and “IUCN Status” (compares IUCN I-II vs. IUCN IV vs. Reference: Hibernia and Scott Reefs for Ashmore, Clerke and Imperieuse for Mermaid). ...................................................................................................................... 12 Table 3. ANOVA testing differences
Recommended publications
  • The Cone Collector N°23
    THE CONE COLLECTOR #23 October 2013 THE Note from CONE the Editor COLLECTOR Dear friends, Editor The Cone scene is moving fast, with new papers being pub- António Monteiro lished on a regular basis, many of them containing descrip- tions of new species or studies of complex groups of species that Layout have baffled us for many years. A couple of books are also in André Poremski the making and they should prove of great interest to anyone Contributors interested in Cones. David P. Berschauer Pierre Escoubas Our bulletin aims at keeping everybody informed of the latest William J. Fenzan developments in the area, keeping a record of newly published R. Michael Filmer taxa and presenting our readers a wide range of articles with Michel Jolivet much and often exciting information. As always, I thank our Bernardino Monteiro many friends who contribute with texts, photos, information, Leo G. Ros comments, etc., helping us to make each new number so inter- Benito José Muñoz Sánchez David Touitou esting and valuable. Allan Vargas Jordy Wendriks The 3rd International Cone Meeting is also on the move. Do Alessandro Zanzi remember to mark it in your diaries for September 2014 (defi- nite date still to be announced) and to plan your trip to Ma- drid. This new event will undoubtedly be a huge success, just like the two former meetings in Stuttgart and La Rochelle. You will enjoy it and of course your presence is indispensable! For now, enjoy the new issue of TCC and be sure to let us have your opinions, views, comments, criticism… and even praise, if you feel so inclined.
    [Show full text]
  • Coral Reef Monitoring in Kofiau and Boo Islands Marine Protected Area, Raja Ampat, West Papua. 2009—2011
    August 2012 Indo-Pacific Division Indonesia Report No 6/12 Coral Reef Monitoring in Kofiau and Boo Islands Marine Protected Area, Raja Ampat, West Papua. 2009—2011 Report Compiled By: Purwanto, Muhajir, Joanne Wilson, Rizya Ardiwijaya, and Sangeeta Mangubhai August 2012 Indo-Pacific Division Indonesia Report No 6/12 Coral Reef Monitoring in Kofiau and Boo Islands Marine Protected Area, Raja Ampat, West Papua. 2009—2011 Report Compiled By: Purwanto, Muhajir, Joanne Wilson, Rizya Ardiwijaya, and Sangeeta Mangubhai Published by: TheNatureConservancy,Indo-PacificDivision Purwanto:TheNatureConservancy,IndonesiaMarineProgram,Jl.Pengembak2,Sanur,Bali, Indonesia.Email: [email protected] Muhajir: TheNatureConservancy,IndonesiaMarineProgram,Jl.Pengembak2,Sanur,Bali, Indonesia.Email: [email protected] JoanneWilson: TheNatureConservancy,IndonesiaMarineProgram,Jl.Pengembak2,Sanur,Bali, Indonesia. RizyaArdiwijaya:TheNatureConservancy,IndonesiaMarineProgram,Jl.Pengembak2,Sanur, Bali,Indonesia.Email: [email protected] SangeetaMangubhai: TheNatureConservancy,IndonesiaMarineProgram,Jl.Pengembak2, Sanur,Bali,Indonesia.Email: [email protected] Suggested Citation: Purwanto,Muhajir,Wilson,J.,Ardiwijaya,R.,Mangubhai,S.2012.CoralReefMonitoringinKofiau andBooIslandsMarineProtectedArea,RajaAmpat,WestPapua.2009-2011.TheNature Conservancy,Indo-PacificDivision,Indonesia.ReportN,6/12.50pp. © 2012012012201 222 The Nature Conservancy AllRightsReserved.Reproductionforanypurposeisprohibitedwithoutpriorpermission. AllmapsdesignedandcreatedbyMuhajir. CoverPhoto:
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Trophic Relationships Between Shallow-Water Black Corals (Antipatharia) and Their Symbionts Using Stable Isotopes
    Belgian Journal of Zoology www.belgianjournalzoology.be This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). ISSN 2295-0451 Research article https://doi.org/10.26496/bjz.2019.33 Assessing trophic relationships between shallow-water black corals (Antipatharia) and their symbionts using stable isotopes Lucas Terrana 1,*, Gilles Lepoint 2 & Igor Eeckhaut 1 1 Biology of Marine Organisms and Biomimetics, University of Mons, 7000 Mons, Belgium. 2 Laboratory of Oceanology-MARE Centre, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium. * Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract. Shallow-water antipatharians host many symbiotic species, which spend their adult life with their host and/or use them to have access to food. Here we determine the trophic relationships between four common macrosymbionts observed on/in Cirripathes anguina, Cirrhipathes densiflora and Stichopathes maldivensis in SW Madagascar. These include the myzostomid Eenymeenymyzostoma nigrocorallium, the gobiid fish Bryaninops yongei, and two palaemonid shrimps, Pontonides unciger and Periclimenes sp. The first is an endosymbiont living in the digestive tract, while the others are ectosymbionts. The analyses show that most likely (i) none of the symbionts uses the host as a main food source, (ii) nocturnal plankton represents a main part of the diet of antipatharians while the symbionts feed preferentially on diurnal plankton, (iii) the myzostomid has the narrowest trophic niche, (iv) the two shrimps have distinct trophic niches and feed at lower trophic level than do the other symbionts. Concerning the myzostomids, they had the same δ13C values but had significantly higher δ15N values than the hosts. TEFs (Trophic Enrichment Factors) recorded were Δ13C = 0.28 ± 0.25 ‰ and Δ15N = 0.51 ± 0.37 ‰, but these were not high enough to explain a predator-prey relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hawaiian Species of Conus (Mollusca: Gastropoda)1
    The Hawaiian Species of Conus (Mollusca: Gastropoda) 1 ALAN J. KOHN2 IN THECOURSE OF a comparative ecological currents are factors which could plausibly study of gastropod mollus ks of the genus effect the isolation necessary for geographic Conus in Hawaii (Ko hn, 1959), some 2,400 speciation . specimens of 25 species were examined. Un­ Of the 33 species of Conus considered in certainty ofthe correct names to be applied to this paper to be valid constituents of the some of these species prompted the taxo­ Hawaiian fauna, about 20 occur in shallow nomic study reported here. Many workers water on marine benches and coral reefs and have contributed to the systematics of the in bays. Of these, only one species, C. ab­ genus Conus; nevertheless, both nomencla­ breviatusReeve, is considered to be endemic to torial and biological questions have persisted the Hawaiian archipelago . Less is known of concerning the correct names of a number of the species more characteristic of deeper water species that occur in the Hawaiian archi­ habitats. Some, known at present only from pelago, here considered to extend from Kure dredging? about the Hawaiian Islands, may (Ocean) Island (28.25° N. , 178.26° W.) to the in the future prove to occur elsewhere as island of Hawaii (20.00° N. , 155.30° W.). well, when adequate sampling methods are extended to other parts of the Indo-West FAUNAL AFFINITY Pacific region. As is characteristic of the marine fauna of ECOLOGY the Hawaiian Islands, the affinities of Conus are with the Indo-Pacific center of distribu­ Since the ecology of Conus has been dis­ tion .
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Two Marine Organisms
    THE SINGAPORE BLUE PLAN 2018 EDITORS ZEEHAN JAAFAR DANWEI HUANG JANI THUAIBAH ISA TANZIL YAN XIANG OW NICHOLAS YAP PUBLISHED BY THE SINGAPORE INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGY OCTOBER 2018 THE SINGAPORE BLUE PLAN 2018 PUBLISHER THE SINGAPORE INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGY C/O NSSE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION 1 NANYANG WALK SINGAPORE 637616 CONTACT: [email protected] ISBN: 978-981-11-9018-6 COPYRIGHT © TEXT THE SINGAPORE INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGY COPYRIGHT © PHOTOGRAPHS AND FIGURES BY ORINGAL CONTRIBUTORS AS CREDITED DATE OF PUBLICATION: OCTOBER 2018 EDITED BY: Z. JAAFAR, D. HUANG, J.T.I. TANZIL, Y.X. OW, AND N. YAP COVER DESIGN BY: ABIGAYLE NG THE SINGAPORE BLUE PLAN 2018 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The editorial team owes a deep gratitude to all contributors of The Singapore Blue Plan 2018 who have tirelessly volunteered their expertise and effort into this document. We are fortunate to receive the guidance and mentorship of Professor Leo Tan, Professor Chou Loke Ming, Professor Peter Ng, and Mr Francis Lim throughout the planning and preparation stages of The Blue Plan 2018. We are indebted to Dr. Serena Teo, Ms Ria Tan and Dr Neo Mei Lin who have made edits that improved the earlier drafts of this document. We are grateful to contributors of photographs: Heng Pei Yan, the Comprehensive Marine Biodiversity Survey photography team, Ria Tan, Sudhanshi Jain, Randolph Quek, Theresa Su, Oh Ren Min, Neo Mei Lin, Abraham Matthew, Rene Ong, van Heurn FC, Lim Swee Cheng, Tran Anh Duc, and Zarina Zainul. We thank The Singapore Institute of Biology for publishing and printing the The Singapore Blue Plan 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Centropyge, Pomacanthidae
    Galaxea, Journal of Coral Reef Studies 22: 31-36(2020) Note Filling an empty role: first report of cleaning by pygmy angelfishes (Centropyge, Pomacanthidae) Pauline NARVAEZ*1, 2, 3 and Renato A. MORAIS1, 3 1 ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, 1 James Cook Drive, Townsville, Queensland 4810, Australia 2 Centre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture, James Cook University, 1 James Cook Drive, Townsville, Queensland 4810, Australia 3 College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, 1 James Cook Drive, Townsville, Queensland 4810, Aus­ tralia * Corresponding author: Pauline Narvaez E­mail: [email protected] Communicated by Frederic Sinniger (Associate Editor­in­Chief) Abstract Cleaner fishes remove ectoparasites, mucus and search of ectoparasites, mucus, and dead or diseased dead tissues from other ‘client’ organisms. These mutu­ tissue (Côté 2000; Côté and Soares 2011). Cleaners have alistic interactions provide benefits for the ‘clients’ and, been classified as either dedicated or facultative, depend­ on a larger scale, maintain healthy reef ecosystems. Here, ing on their degree of reliance on cleaning interactions for we report two species of angelfishes, Centropyge bicolor accessing food (Vaughan et al. 2017). While dedicated and C. tibicen, acting as cleaners of the blue tang cleaners rely almost exclusively on cleaning, facultative Paracanthurus hepatus in an aquarium. This observation ones also exploit other food sources. In total, 208 fish and is the first time that pygmy angelfishes are recorded 51 shrimp species have been reported as either dedicated cleaning in any en vironment. This novel cleaning ob­ or facultative cleaners (Vaughan et al. 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Estimates of Sponge Consumption Rates on an Indo-Pacific Reef
    Vol. 672: 123–140, 2021 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published August 19 https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13786 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Estimates of sponge consumption rates on an Indo-Pacific reef Charlotte Mortimer1, Matthew Dunn2, Abdul Haris3, Jamaluddin Jompa3, James Bell1,* 1School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6012, New Zealand 2The National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA), Wellington 6021, New Zealand 3Universitas Hasanuddin, Department of Marine Science, Makassar 90245, Indonesia ABSTRACT: Determining predator diets is essential for understanding the strength of top-down processes and how they cascade through food webs. This is especially important for sponges, key members of benthic communities, whose dominance has increased in recent years on some coral reefs. However, the diversity of spongivorous fishes and the sponges they consume are relatively unknown. Here, we estimated sponge consumption by spongivorous fishes in the Wakatobi Marine National Park, Indonesia. We deployed cameras to identify fish biting at the dominant reef sponge Xestospongia spp. and then used gut content analysis and fish abundance estimates to quantify sponge consumption. In total, 33 species from 10 families of reef fish were identified taking bites from Xestospongia spp.; however, the 2 most prolific sponge-grazers, Ctenochaetus binotatus and Chaetodon kleinii, had no sponge in their guts, showing that for some fish, bites on sponge surfaces are not reliable evidence of sponge consumption. Gut contents indicated that Pygoplites diacanthus was an obligate spongivore, while Pomacanthus imperator, P. xanthometo- pon, Zanclus cornutus and Siganus punctatus regularly consumed sponges. Sponge consumption by these 5 spongivores was estimated at 46.6 ± 18.3 g sponge 1000 m−2 d−1.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Opsin Expression Under Varying Light Conditions Differ Between Ecologically Distinct Fish Species Martin Luehrmann1,*,‡, Sara M
    © 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Experimental Biology (2018) 221, jeb175281. doi:10.1242/jeb.175281 RESEARCH ARTICLE Short-term colour vision plasticity on the reef: changes in opsin expression under varying light conditions differ between ecologically distinct fish species Martin Luehrmann1,*,‡, Sara M. Stieb1,2,*,‡, Karen L. Carleton3, Alisa Pietzker1, Karen L. Cheney1,4 and N. Justin Marshall1 ABSTRACT Foote et al., 2004; Miyagi et al., 2012; Rick et al., 2006; Sandkam Vision mediates important behavioural tasks such as mate choice, et al., 2015; Stuart-Fox et al., 2003). Therefore, tuning of escape from predators and foraging. In fish, photoreceptors are photoreceptor spectral sensitivities to specific visual tasks and/or generally tuned to specific visual tasks and/or to their light parts of the light spectrum relevant for such behaviours may be environment, according to depth or water colour to ensure important for maintaining optimal performance (Price, 2017). This optimal performance. Evolutionary mechanisms acting on genes is particularly evident in fish, which have dispersed and adapted to encoding opsin, the protein component of the photopigment, can habitats profoundly different in their light environment, including influence the spectral sensitivity of photoreceptors. Opsin genes freshwater lakes and rivers, marine coastal reefs, pelagic zones and are known to respond to environmental conditions on a number of the deep sea. Considering the light conditions in these environments, time scales, including short time frames due to seasonal variation, fish visual systems have adapted to the overall environmental or through longer-term evolutionary tuning. There is also evidence illumination of their habitat (Cronin et al., 2014; Lythgoe, 1979).
    [Show full text]
  • First Quantitative Ecological Study of the Hin Pae Pinnacle, Mu Ko Chumphon, Thailand
    Ramkhamhaeng International Journal of Science and Technology (2020) 3(3): 37-45 ORIGINAL PAPER First quantitative ecological study of the Hin Pae pinnacle, Mu Ko Chumphon, Thailand Makamas Sutthacheepa*, Sittiporn Pengsakuna, Supphakarn Phoaduanga, Siriluck Rongprakhona , Chainarong Ruengthongb, Supawadee Hamaneec, Thamasak Yeemina, a Marine Biodiversity Research Group, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ramkhamhaeng University, Huamark, Bangkok, Thailand b Chumphon Marine National Park Operation Center 1, Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Chumphon Province, Thailand c School of Business Administration, Sripatum University, Jatujak, Bangkok *Corresponding author: [email protected] Received: 21 August 2020 / Revised: 21 September 2020 / Accepted: 1 October 2020 Abstract. The Western Gulf of Thailand holds a rich set protection. These ecosystems also play significant of coral reef communities, especially at the islands of Mu roles in the Gulf of Thailand regarding public Ko Chumphon Marine National Park, being of great importance to Thailand’s biodiversity and economy due awareness of coastal resources conservation to its touristic potential. The goal of this study was to (Cesar, 2000; Yeemin et al., 2006; Wilkinson, provide a first insight on the reef community of Hin Pae, 2008). Consequently, coral reefs hold significant a pinnacle located 20km off the shore of Chumphon benefits to the socioeconomic development in Province, a known SCUBA diving site with the potential Thailand. to become a popular tourist destination. The survey was conducted during May 2019, when a 100m transect was used to characterize the habitat. Hin Pae holds a rich reef Chumphon Province has several marine tourism community with seven different coral taxa, seven hotspots, such as the islands in Mu Ko Chumphon invertebrates, and 44 fish species registered to the National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Live Coral Habitat for Reef Fishes and Its Role in Key Ecological Processes
    ResearchOnline@JCU This file is part of the following reference: Coker, Darren J. (2012) The importance of live coral habitat for reef fishes and its role in key ecological processes. PhD thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: http://eprints.jcu.edu.au/23714/ The author has certified to JCU that they have made a reasonable effort to gain permission and acknowledge the owner of any third party copyright material included in this document. If you believe that this is not the case, please contact [email protected] and quote http://eprints.jcu.edu.au/23714/ THE IMPORTANCE OF LIVE CORAL HABITAT FOR REEF FISHES AND ITS ROLE IN KEY ECOLOGICAL PROCESSES Thesis submitted by Darren J. Coker (B.Sc, GDipResMeth) May 2012 For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies and AIMS@JCU James Cook University Townsville, Queensland, Australia Statement of access I, the undersigned, the author of this thesis, understand that James Cook University will make it available for use within the University Library and via the Australian Digital Thesis Network for use elsewhere. I understand that as an unpublished work this thesis has significant protection under the Copyright Act and I do not wish to put any further restrictions upon access to this thesis. Signature Date ii Statement of sources Declaration I declare that this thesis is my own work and has not been submitted in any form for another degree or diploma at my university or other institution of tertiary education. Information derived from the published or unpublished work of others has been acknowledged in the text and a list of references is given.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Relationships in a Small Habitat-Dependent Coral Reef Fish: an Ecological, Behavioural and Genetic Analysis
    ResearchOnline@JCU This file is part of the following reference: Rueger, Theresa (2016) Social relationships in a small habitat-dependent coral reef fish: an ecological, behavioural and genetic analysis. PhD thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: http://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/46690/ The author has certified to JCU that they have made a reasonable effort to gain permission and acknowledge the owner of any third party copyright material included in this document. If you believe that this is not the case, please contact [email protected] and quote http://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/46690/ Social relationships in a small habitat- dependent coral reef fish: an ecological, behavioural and genetic analysis Thesis submitted by Theresa Rueger, March 2016 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy College of Marine and Environmental Science & ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies James Cook University Declaration of Ethics This research presented and reported in this thesis was conducted in compliance with the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes, 7th Edition, 2004 and the Qld Animal Care and Protection Act, 2001. The proposed research study received animal ethics approval from the JCU Animal Ethics Committee Approval Number #A1847. Signature ___31/3/2016___ Date i Acknowledgement This thesis was no one-woman show. There is a huge number of people who contributed, directly or indirectly, to its existence. I had amazing support during my field work, by fellow students and good friends Tiffany Sih, James White, Patrick Smallhorn-West, and Mariana Alvarez-Noriega.
    [Show full text]
  • Reef Fishes of the Bird's Head Peninsula, West
    Check List 5(3): 587–628, 2009. ISSN: 1809-127X LISTS OF SPECIES Reef fishes of the Bird’s Head Peninsula, West Papua, Indonesia Gerald R. Allen 1 Mark V. Erdmann 2 1 Department of Aquatic Zoology, Western Australian Museum. Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Perth, Western Australia 6986. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Conservation International Indonesia Marine Program. Jl. Dr. Muwardi No. 17, Renon, Denpasar 80235 Indonesia. Abstract A checklist of shallow (to 60 m depth) reef fishes is provided for the Bird’s Head Peninsula region of West Papua, Indonesia. The area, which occupies the extreme western end of New Guinea, contains the world’s most diverse assemblage of coral reef fishes. The current checklist, which includes both historical records and recent survey results, includes 1,511 species in 451 genera and 111 families. Respective species totals for the three main coral reef areas – Raja Ampat Islands, Fakfak-Kaimana coast, and Cenderawasih Bay – are 1320, 995, and 877. In addition to its extraordinary species diversity, the region exhibits a remarkable level of endemism considering its relatively small area. A total of 26 species in 14 families are currently considered to be confined to the region. Introduction and finally a complex geologic past highlighted The region consisting of eastern Indonesia, East by shifting island arcs, oceanic plate collisions, Timor, Sabah, Philippines, Papua New Guinea, and widely fluctuating sea levels (Polhemus and the Solomon Islands is the global centre of 2007). reef fish diversity (Allen 2008). Approximately 2,460 species or 60 percent of the entire reef fish The Bird’s Head Peninsula and surrounding fauna of the Indo-West Pacific inhabits this waters has attracted the attention of naturalists and region, which is commonly referred to as the scientists ever since it was first visited by Coral Triangle (CT).
    [Show full text]