Revue Française De Civilisation Britannique, XXIV-4

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Revue Française De Civilisation Britannique, XXIV-4 Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique French Journal of British Studies XXIV-4 | 2019 Mutations politiques et économiques du Royaume- Uni, entre perspective britannique et angle écossais Numéro en hommage à Jacques Leruez Political and Economic Change in the UK: British and Scottish Perspectives Edwige Camp-Pietrain (dir.) Édition électronique URL : http://journals.openedition.org/rfcb/4752 DOI : 10.4000/rfcb.4752 ISSN : 2429-4373 Éditeur CRECIB - Centre de recherche et d'études en civilisation britannique Référence électronique Edwige Camp-Pietrain (dir.), Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique, XXIV-4 | 2019, « Mutations politiques et économiques du Royaume-Uni, entre perspective britannique et angle écossais » [En ligne], mis en ligne le 18 novembre 2019, consulté le 05 mai 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/rfcb/4752 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/rfcb.4752 Ce document a été généré automatiquement le 5 mai 2020. Revue française de civilisation britannique est mis à disposition selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International. 1 SOMMAIRE Avant-propos Edwige Camp-Pietrain Pour saluer Jacques Leruez Gérard Hocmard Hommage à Jacques Leruez Jean-Didier Hache Bibliographie de Jacques Leruez Edwige Camp-Pietrain Margaret Thatcher, un tournant Margaret Thatcher et les marchés financiers : le paradoxe de la déréglementation Marie-Claude Esposito From the “Thatcherisation of Europe” to Brexit Nicholas Sowels Margaret Thatcher in Spitting Image Yves Golder La Dévolution du pouvoir, source d'innovations The Scottish First Ministers from 1999 to 2014: Role, Power and Leadership Gilles Leydier Twenty Years of Devolution in Scotland: the End of a British Party System? Fiona Simpkins Devolution, the Independence Referendum and Votes at 16 in Scotland: Holyrood, a Pioneer in Democracy Leading the Way for Westminster? Sarah Pickard L'Écosse et l'Union Mise à jour de la fiche signalétique de l’Écosse Jean Berton Can the Anglo-Scottish Union Survive Brexit? Michael Keating L'Économie d'une Écosse indépendante, de la rente pétrolière au Brexit Edwige Camp-Pietrain Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique, XXIV-4 | 2019 2 Réformes et conservatismes Non, non, non ! Le Combat tory d’Enoch Powell contre les réformes de la Chambre des Lords en 1958 et 1969 Stéphane Porion From Exclusion to Inclusion: the Glasgow Magdalene Institution, an Instrument of Social Control in the Nineteenth Century Christian Auer Comptes-rendus Compte rendu de l’ouvrage L’Éveil du dragon gallois de Stéphanie Bory Moya Jones Review of British Broadcasting and the Public-Private Dichotomy by Simon Dawes Lucie de Carvalho Compte-rendu de Portraits of Violence : War and the Aesthetics of Disfigurement de Suzannah Biernoff Sophie Sibson Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique, XXIV-4 | 2019 3 Avant-propos Foreword Edwige Camp-Pietrain 1 Né en 1931, Jacques Leruez fit des études supérieures d'anglais, de droit et de science politique. Il enseigna l'anglais en collège et en lycée avant d'entrer au CNRS en 1968. Sur le plan de la recherche, il s'intéressa aux questions économiques (avec, à l'origine, une thèse sur la planification), puis au système politique du Royaume-Uni. Il publia de nombreux travaux sur les années Thatcher et sur les politiques étrangères du Royaume-Uni. Il sut par ailleurs faire connaître au public français la question de l'Écosse. Ce sujet, quelque peu marginal dans les années quatre-vingt, devint un thème à part entière de la civilisation britannique. En effet, la dévolution du pouvoir, longtemps discutée dans ses moindres détails, connut une traduction concrète à partir de 1999. De plus, loin d'endiguer la progression du SNP, parti indépendantiste, elle lui fournit un cadre pour convoquer un référendum d'autodétermination. 2 Jacques Leruez devint une référence dans ses domaines de prédilection. Outre ses articles et ouvrages (dont il faut souligner les mises à jour), il contribuait régulièrement à commentaires de l'actualité pour la Documentation française ou l'encyclopédie Universalis. C'est d'ailleurs en tant qu'étudiante que je découvris son ouvrage intitulé L'Écosse, une nation sans État peu après sa première parution. Cette lecture, rapidement complétée, suscita une passion pour les questions institutionnelles et politiques écossaises. C'est ainsi que j'eus l'occasion de travailler avec Jacques Leruez, dans un cadre universitaire ou bien au sein de l'association franco-écossaise qu'il présidait. Toujours dynamique, enthousiaste, passionné par les questions politiques et économiques, il resta actif bien au-delà de sa retraite, prise en 1997, jusqu'à son décès en 2018. 3 Membre du CRECIB depuis sa création, Jacques Leruez avait publié de nombreux articles dans la Revue française de civilisation britannique et avait appartenu à son comité de direction. Ce numéro spécial propose une thématique relativement large, afin de rendre hommage à la diversité de ses centres d'intérêts, autour de quelques grandes mutations du Royaume-Uni en général, et en Écosse en particulier. Nombre d'auteurs Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique, XXIV-4 | 2019 4 ne manquent pas de se référer au Brexit, rupture historique dont les répercussions sont attendues dans la plupart des champs de l'action publique. 4 Trois auteurs abordent des mutations dues aux gouvernements de Margaret Thatcher. Après avoir présenté le contexte des années soixante-dix, Marie-Claude Esposito évoque la déréglementation financière qui s'est accompagnée d'un durcissement de la réglementation bancaire. Nicholas Sowell analyse l'influence du Premier ministre britannique sur une étape clé de la construction européenne, le marché unique, mais aussi la prise de distance qui s'en est suivie, jusqu'au référendum de 2016 sur la maintien dans l'UE. Yves Golder s'intéresse à la caricature de la Dame de fer dans Spitting Image, en soulignant que les critiques ainsi véhiculées ont pu renforcer sa stature politique. 5 Trois articles sont consacrés aux mutations engendrées par la dévolution du pouvoir. Gilles Leydier centre son analyse sur les First ministers écossais (travaillistes puis SNP), leurs pouvoirs, leurs décisions, leur relations avec les gouvernements britanniques successifs. Fiona Simpkins s'intéresse plus largement à l'impact de la dévolution sur le système britannique de partis avec la montée en puissance du SNP et les divergences internes aux partis britanniques. Sarah Pickard analyse la décision, prise par le Parlement écossais, d'abaisser la majorité électorale lors du référendum d'autodétermination de 2014, ses effets en Écosse sur le court et le moyen terme et sa portée dans le débat britannique. 6 Trois articles abordent les relations entre Écosse et Angleterre, à travers leurs mutations, au moment où le Brexit semble fragiliser l'Union. Jean Berton a une approche historique et linguistique permettant d'apprécier les pressions anglaises et les résistances écossaises. Michael Keating traite des conséquences politiques et institutionnelles du Brexit, en particulier les risques de re-centralisation, de désintégration, voire de reconfiguration de l'Union. Edwige Camp-Pietrain analyse l'évolution du programme économique du SNP depuis le référendum de 2014, afin de pallier les faiblesses apparues pendant la campagne, mais dans un cadre désormais dominé par les incertitudes inhérentes au Brexit. 7 Ce numéro se termine par deux articles traitant de lois singulières, posant la question des conservatismes tentant d'empêcher les réformes ou de contrôler leurs effets. Stéphane Porion détaille l'opposition virulente d'Enoch Powell à l'égard de la réforme de la Chambre des Lords dans la deuxième moitié du XXe siècle, un positionnement qui puise ses racines dans la pensée tory, de Burke à Disraeli. Christian Auer consacre un article à la Magdalen Institution de Glasgow, qu'il décrit comme un moyen de contrôle social des prostituées dans l'Écosse du XIXe siècle, pleinement intégrée au Royaume- Uni. 8 Ce numéro a été mis en forme avec le logiciel Lodel par Arnaud Page, Anne Cousson, Shirley Doulière et John Mullen. Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique, XXIV-4 | 2019 5 AUTEUR EDWIGE CAMP-PIETRAIN Université Polytechnique des Hauts-de-France (Valenciennes) Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique, XXIV-4 | 2019 6 Pour saluer Jacques Leruez In Homage to Jacques Leruez Gérard Hocmard 1 C’est avec émotion que j’ai reçu cette invitation à rédiger un hommage à Jacques Leruez, dont j’ai partagé l’amitié pendant quarante ans. 2 Je l’ai connu par l’intermédiaire de Marie-Danièle, ma collègue à Paris III dans les années 1970. Jacques avait déjà à ce moment-là opéré le virage professionnel qui l’avait amené à quitter sa carrière de professeur certifié d’anglais pour reprendre des études, à la Faculté de Droit de Caen d’abord, puis à Paris à la Fondation nationale des Sciences politiques et à la Faculté de Droit. Il en était sorti avec un DEA, passant ainsi, comme l’a si joliment dit le Professeur Laidlaw dans l’hommage qu’il lui a rendu au nom de la Franco-Scottish Society, « d’angliciste à politologue, ou plutôt à politologue angliciste ». Détaché depuis quelques années au CNRS, il venait, lorsque j’ai fait sa connaissance, d’être inscrit sur la liste d’aptitude à la maîtrise et allait bientôt être nommé maître de recherches. 3 La sympathie mutuelle entretenue par des rencontres en Val de Loire orléanais chez une amie commune et par des centres d’intérêt partagés, en l’espèce les institutions et la vie politique britanniques, ont fait qu’à partir de ce moment-là nous avons eu des contacts fréquents en dépit de parcours très divergents. C’est ainsi que nous avons tous deux fait partie du petit noyau de happy few qui, autour de Monica Charlot, a fondé le CRECIB. Jacques a poursuivi une brillante carrière universitaire qui l’a amené à faire partie du Conseil de Laboratoire du CERI, puis représentant des chercheurs du CERI au Conseil scientifique de l’IEP de Paris avant de siéger au Comité national du CNRS, indépendamment de cours dispensés dans plusieurs universités parisiennes et de nombreuses directions de thèses.
Recommended publications
  • November 2002
    Nations and Regions: The Dynamics of Devolution Quarterly Monitoring Programme Scotland Quarterly Report November 2002 The monitoring programme is jointly funded by the ESRC and the Leverhulme Trust Contents 1. Scottish Executive Barry Winetrobe 4 2. The Scottish Parliament Mark Shephard 7 3. The Media Philip Schlesinger 11 4. Public Attitudes and identity John Curtice 14 5. Scotland/UK Relations Alex Wright 18 6. Scotland/International Relations Alex Wright 22 7. Relations with Local Government Neil McGarvey 27 9. Legal Disputes Barry Winetrobe 31 10. Political parties James Mitchell 32 11. Public policies Barry Winetrobe 34 2 Key points: James Mitchell — First Minister Jack McConnell became embroiled in an embarrassing internal constituency row over local party funds; — Culture Minister Mike Watson broke collective cabinet responsibility by speaking out—but not voting—against Executive health policy fearing that he might lose votes in the forthcoming Scottish elections; — Herald newspaper went up for sale with the prospect that it will be bought by owners of Scotsman rivals. 3 1. Scottish Executive Barry Winetrobe 1.1 Collective responsibility The application of the doctrine of collective responsibility has been under the spotlight in the Glasgow hospitals issue. The Culture Minister, Mike Watson, has been a leading public opponent of the reorganisation plan, but voted with the Executive in a debate on the issue on 12 September. His MPA, Janis Hughes, put herself in an even more unusual position, by abstaining on the Executive amendment to the critical SNP motion, but then voting for the as-amended motion. The First Minister refused to sack either, on the basis that they had both adhered to collective responsibility by their votes.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Evidence from Nigel Smith to the Commission on Parliamentary Reform - Edinburgh
    Commission on Parliamentary Reform CPR_083 Written views from Nigel Smith Written evidence from Nigel Smith to the Commission on Parliamentary Reform - Edinburgh Introduction Summary I share the view of the Commission’s remit on the importance of checks and balances and the necessity for a distinct identity for parliament beyond government. From the outset, the culture, the founding culture of the parliament, was not that recommended by the Constitutional steering group with its emphasis on consensual working. Instead a more adversarial practice was established from the beginning and then intensified by the onset of the referendum and now its aftermath. The structure of parliament tends to over represent government in its affairs which might have mattered less in a more consensual parliament but given the founding culture, it has weakened the parliamentarians and reduced their effectiveness. Reforming procedures while obviously desirable may not be possible so adverse is the current culture. The result is the Scottish Parliament has been only a partial success, certainly less successful than we campaigners hoped for at the outset in 1997. It can do better. As Adam Ferguson said in 1782, ‘Nations stumble upon their establishments, which are indeed the result of human action, but not the execution of any human design’. Looking back at the experience of establishing the Scottish Parliament, I see all too clearly what he meant. There are many stumbles in the story that follows. The political climate in Scotland is difficult at the moment so the risk of being completely misrepresented is high. Nevertheless, I have resisted the temptation to write a ‘milk and water’ assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • 30 Years of Tory Euroscepticism Are Coming to the Fore
    Delusions and meddling: 30 years of Tory Euroscepticism are coming to the fore blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2017/05/09/delusions-and-meddling-30-years-of-tory-euroscepticism-are-coming-to-the- fore/ 2017-5-9 The Conservative party’s relationship with the EU has come a long way since Edward Heath urged the UK to be ‘inside Europe’. Euroscepticism has a long history in the party, but the drift of public, media and Tory sentiment away from European unity crystallised in 1988 under Margaret Thatcher. The Brexit process is now bringing these tensions to the fore, writes Oliver Daddow. We can expect more – and even more damaging – spats like the one after the May-Juncker dinner in April. Playing to domestic galleries has always been the default setting for UK politicians when it comes to European policy. In this process, a largely EU-hostile UK press market has played a significant role in both feeding political negativity about the EU and having it reflected back in political discourse. Historically, this has not gone down well with the UK’s European partners. Even notionally pro-European governments have struggled to break the mould. The content of the Brexit negotiations, combined with a febrile election atmosphere, was never going to be conducive to cool, studied diplomacy. The spat that followed the European Council’s publication of its guidelines for the EU negotiations was no exception. The document was immediately overshadowed by a furore over leaks of conversations that took place at a Downing Street dinner held three days earlier. It was attended by Theresa May and members of her Brexit team, along with the President of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, and his staff.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Commons Official Report Parliamentary Debates
    Monday Volume 652 7 January 2019 No. 228 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 7 January 2019 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. HER MAJESTY’S GOVERNMENT MEMBERS OF THE CABINET (FORMED BY THE RT HON. THERESA MAY, MP, JUNE 2017) PRIME MINISTER,FIRST LORD OF THE TREASURY AND MINISTER FOR THE CIVIL SERVICE—The Rt Hon. Theresa May, MP CHANCELLOR OF THE DUCHY OF LANCASTER AND MINISTER FOR THE CABINET OFFICE—The Rt Hon. David Lidington, MP CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER—The Rt Hon. Philip Hammond, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT—The Rt Hon. Sajid Javid, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH AFFAIRS—The Rt. Hon Jeremy Hunt, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR EXITING THE EUROPEAN UNION—The Rt Hon. Stephen Barclay, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DEFENCE—The Rt Hon. Gavin Williamson, MP LORD CHANCELLOR AND SECRETARY OF STATE FOR JUSTICE—The Rt Hon. David Gauke, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE—The Rt Hon. Matt Hancock, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR BUSINESS,ENERGY AND INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY—The Rt Hon. Greg Clark, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD OF TRADE—The Rt Hon. Liam Fox, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WORK AND PENSIONS—The Rt Hon. Amber Rudd, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR EDUCATION—The Rt Hon. Damian Hinds, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT,FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS—The Rt Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cape of Asia: Essays on European History
    A Cape of Asia.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 10-10-11 / 11:44 | Pag. 1 a cape of asia A Cape of Asia.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 10-10-11 / 11:44 | Pag. 2 A Cape of Asia.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 10-10-11 / 11:44 | Pag. 3 A Cape of Asia essays on european history Henk Wesseling leiden university press A Cape of Asia.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 10-10-11 / 11:44 | Pag. 4 Cover design and lay-out: Sander Pinkse Boekproductie, Amsterdam isbn 978 90 8728 128 1 e-isbn 978 94 0060 0461 nur 680 / 686 © H. Wesseling / Leiden University Press, 2011 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the written permission of both the copyright owner and the author of the book. A Cape of Asia.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 10-10-11 / 11:44 | Pag. 5 Europe is a small cape of Asia paul valéry A Cape of Asia.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 10-10-11 / 11:44 | Pag. 6 For Arnold Burgen A Cape of Asia.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 10-10-11 / 11:44 | Pag. 7 Contents Preface and Introduction 9 europe and the wider world Globalization: A Historical Perspective 17 Rich and Poor: Early and Later 23 The Expansion of Europe and the Development of Science and Technology 28 Imperialism 35 Changing Views on Empire and Imperialism 46 Some Reflections on the History of the Partition
    [Show full text]
  • BAKALÁŘSKÁ PRÁCE Popular Culture and Margaret Thatcher, The
    ZÁPADOČESKÁ UNIVERZITA V PLZNI FAKULTA FILOZOFICKÁ BAKALÁŘSKÁ PRÁCE Popular Culture and Margaret Thatcher, the Media Image of the “Iron Lady“ Kateřina Tichá Plzeň 2018 Západočeská univerzita v Plzni Fakulta filozofická Katedra anglického jazyka a literatury Studijní program Filologie Studijní obor Cizí jazyky pro komerční praxi Kombinace angličtina – francouzština Bakalářská práce Popular Culture and Margaret Thatcher, the Media Image of the “Iron Lady“ Kateřina Tichá Vedoucí práce: Mgr. Tomáš Hostýnek Katedra anglického jazyka a literatury Fakulta filozofická Západočeské univerzity v Plzni Plzeň 2018 Prohlašuji, že jsem práci zpracovala samostatně a použila jen uvedených pramenů a literatury. Plzeň, duben 2018 ……………………… Touto cestou bych chtěla poděkovat Mgr. Tomášovi Hostýnkovi, za cenné rady a připomínky v průběhu psaní mé bakalářské práce, které pro mě byly velmi přínosné. Table of contents 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................ 1 2 EARLY LIFE 1925 – 1947 .......................................................... 3 2.1 Childhood ..................................................................................... 3 2.2 Education ...................................................................................... 3 2.3 Relation towards her parents ..................................................... 4 3 EARLY FORAY INTO POLITICS 1948 – 1959 ........................... 5 4 POLITICAL LIFE 1959 – 1979 ................................................... 7 4.1 Opposition ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The EU Referendum and EU Reform
    EUROPEAN UNION COMMITTEE The EU referendum and EU reform Evidence Volume Catherine Bearder MEP, Ashley Fox MEP and Glenis Willmott MEP—Oral Evidence (QQ 126-133) ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 Bertelsmann Stiftung, Centre for European Policy Studies and European Policy Centre—Oral Evidence (QQ 134-139) ......................................................................................................................... 19 Elmar Brok MEP and Danuta Hübner MEP—Oral Evidence (QQ 120-125) .............................. 33 CBI, TheCityUK and TUC—Oral Evidence (QQ 53-64) ............................................................... 44 The Centre for Cross Border Studies—Written Evidence (VEU0008) ...................................... 65 Centre for European Policy Studies, Bertelsmann Stiftung and European Policy Centre—Oral Evidence (QQ 133-138) ......................................................................................................................... 80 Convention of Scottish Local Authorities—Written Evidence (VEU0006) ................................ 81 Professor Laura Cram and Professor Andrew Scott—Oral Evidence (QQ 98-105) ............... 89 Alun Davies AM, Suzy Davies AM, Rt Hon Lord Elis-Thomas AM David Melding AM, and William Powell AM—Oral Evidence (QQ 22-27) .......................................................................... 115 Suzy Davies AM, Alun Davies AM, Rt Hon Lord Elis-Thomas
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter | | Autumn 2014
    | The University of Edinburgh Law School Newsletter | www.law.ed.ac.uk | Autumn 2014 Newsletter | Autumn 2014 | 1789 – 2014 Join us to celebrate 225 years of Old College More details inside! Old College, 1900. Courtesy Digital Imaging Unit, Edinburgh University Library Also in this issue | New Head of School | Class of the 1980s | A Week with George Gretton | | Page 2 | The University of Edinburgh Law School Newsletter | www.law.ed.ac.uk | Autumn 2014 | Welcome from our New Head of School – Richard Sparks I am really honoured to take up the post of Head of School, and particularly delighted to extend a warm welcome to our alumni. We hope to see many of you in November when we celebrate 225 years of Old College (see page 6 for more details). This is an exciting time, with work starting on our redevelopment in the New Year. Alas, ambitious refurbishment does not come without some practical inconvenience and I am full of praise for our support staff who are working so hard to ensure life for our current students and academic staff will not be disrupted by the building work. I am confident that we can minimize those disruptions and continue to develop and thrive as a School. I am really grateful to all concerned for making it so. I also want to take this opportunity to welcome our new academic staff this semester. Dr Paolo Cavaliere joins us as the new Lecturer in Digital Media/IT Law. Paolo joins us from the Centre for Socio-Legal Studies at the University of Oxford.
    [Show full text]
  • SLR I27.Indd
    Issue 27 March/April 2005 scottishleftreview £1.50 / £1.00 claimants Really, why bother? salvaging something from the general election scottishleftreviewIssue 27 March/April 2005 Contents Feedback.........................................................2 Old age poverty .............................................16 Ian Tasker Comment ........................................................4 What’s going on in America? ........................18 Briefing ...........................................................6 Bernie Sanders You’re a socialist; can you vote Labour? ........9 Politics is a joke ............................................20 John Flint Tommy Sheppard, Elaine Smith An MOT for MP hopefuls...............................12 Atomised science..........................................22 Jim and Margaret Cuthbert Henry McCubbin Reviews .........................................................24 feedback Letters for publication should be emailed to [email protected] he current Labour government is deeply unpopular but precisely because it is a weak Labour government. Then the Tit is more than likely to be re-elected but with a reduced extent of ordinary people’s participation in politics may be more majority. than just voting once every five years, or not even voting at all in many cases. The Conservatives offer little in the way of a serious challenge because they are still despised and internally fractious. The Professor Gregor Gall, University of Stirling Liberal Democrats are a more serious challenge in terms of ideas and policies but lack the critical mass to make a breakthrough. Parties to the left of Labour without PR are no he report commissioned by the Federation of Small more than clutches of protest votes. TBusinesses and the Sunday Herald reveals that Scotland is Does this amount to a democratic deficit, or even a crisis of not “the best small country in the world”, as claimed by Jack democracy, in Britain? Whether it does will depend upon two McConnell.
    [Show full text]
  • SLR I15 March April 03.Indd
    scottishleftreview comment Issue 15 March/April 2003 A journal of the left in Scotland brought about since the formation of the t is one of those questions that the partial-democrats Scottish Parliament in July 1999 Imock, but it has never been more crucial; what is your vote for? Too much of our political culture in Britain Contents (although this is changing in Scotland) still sees a vote Comment ...............................................................2 as a weapon of last resort. Democracy, for the partial- democrat, is about giving legitimacy to what was going Vote for us ..............................................................4 to happen anyway. If what was going to happen anyway becomes just too much for the public to stomach (or if Bill Butler, Linda Fabiani, Donald Gorrie, Tommy Sheridan, they just tire of the incumbents or, on a rare occasion, Robin Harper are actually enthusiastic about an alternative choice) then End of the affair .....................................................8 they can invoke their right of veto and bring in the next lot. Tommy Sheppard, Dorothy Grace Elder And then it is back to business as before. Three million uses for a second vote ..................11 Blair is the partial-democrat par excellence. There are David Miller two ways in which this is easily recognisable. The first, More parties, more choice?.................................14 and by far the most obvious, is the manner in which he Isobel Lindsay views international democracy. In Blair’s world view, the If voting changed anything...................................16 purpose of the United Nations is not to make a reasoned, debated, democratic decision but to give legitimacy to the Robin McAlpine actions of the powerful.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of Parliament from All Political Parties Support a Reduction in Tourism VAT
    MP SUPPORTER LIST, AUTUMN/WINTER 2016-2017 Members of Parliament from all political parties support a reduction in tourism VAT Name Type Party Name Type Party Mr Alun Cairns MP Conservative Mr George Howarth MP Labour Mr Andrew Bingham MP Conservative Mr Gerald Jones MP Labour Mr Andrew Bridgen MP Conservative Mr Gordon Marsden MP Labour Mr Andrew Turner MP Conservative Mr Ian Austin MP Labour Ms Anne-Marie Morris MP Conservative Ms Jessica Morden MP Labour Mr Ben Howlett MP Conservative Mr Jim Cunningham MP Labour Mr Byron Davies MP Conservative Mr Jim Dowd MP Labour Ms Caroline Ansell MP Conservative Ms Jo Stevens MP Labour Mrs Caroline Spelman MP Conservative Mr Justin Madders MP Labour Ms Charlotte Leslie MP Conservative Ms Kate Hoey MP Labour Mr Chris Davies MP Conservative Ms Mary Glindon MP Labour Mr Christopher Pincher MP Conservative Mr Paul Flynn MP Labour Mr Conor Burns MP Conservative Mr Robert Flello MP Labour Mr Craig Williams MP Conservative Mr Roger Godsiff MP Labour Mr Craig Tracey MP Conservative Mr Ronnie Campbell MP Labour Mr David Nuttall MP Conservative Mr Stephen Hepburn MP Labour Mr David Jones MP Conservative Mr Steve Rotheram MP Labour Mr David Davis MP Conservative Mr Steven Kinnock MP Labour Mr David Morris MP Conservative Mr Tom Blenkinsop MP Labour Mr Geoffrey Cox MP Conservative Mr Virendra Sharma MP Labour Mr Geoffrey Clifton-Brown MP Conservative Ms Yasmin Qureshi MP Labour Mr George Freeman MP Conservative Mr Alistair Carmichael MP Liberal Democrat Sir Gerald Howarth MP Conservative Mr Greg Mulholland
    [Show full text]
  • House of Commons Official Report Parliamentary
    Thursday Volume 664 26 September 2019 No. 343 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 26 September 2019 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 843 26 SEPTEMBER 2019 Speaker’s Statement 844 there will be an urgent question later today on the House of Commons matter to which I have just referred, and that will be an opportunity for colleagues to say what they think. This is something of concern across the House. It is Thursday 26 September 2019 not a party political matter and, certainly as far as I am concerned, it should not be in any way, at any time, to any degree a matter for partisan point scoring. It is The House met at half-past Nine o’clock about something bigger than an individual, an individual party or an individual political or ideological viewpoint. Let us treat of it on that basis. In the meantime, may I just ask colleagues—that is all I am doing and all I can PRAYERS do as your representative in the Chair—please to lower the decibel level and to try to treat each other as opponents, not as enemies? [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Sir Peter Bottomley (Worthing West) (Con): On a point of order, Mr Speaker. Speaker’s Statement Mr Speaker: Order. I genuinely am not convinced, but I will take one point of order if the hon. Gentleman Mr Speaker: Before we get under way with today’s insists.
    [Show full text]