Symbols 1-Form, 10 4-Acceleration, 184 4-Force, 115 4-Momentum, 116

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Symbols 1-Form, 10 4-Acceleration, 184 4-Force, 115 4-Momentum, 116 Index Symbols B 1-form, 10 Betti number, 589 4-acceleration, 184 Bianchi type-I models, 448 4-force, 115 Bianchi’s differential identities, 60 4-momentum, 116 complex valued, 532–533 total, 122 consequences of in Newman-Penrose 4-velocity, 114 formalism, 549–551 first contracted, 63 second contracted, 63 A bicharacteristic curves, 620 acceleration big crunch, 441 4-acceleration, 184 big-bang cosmological model, 438, 449 Newtonian, 74 Birkhoff’s theorem, 271 action function or functional bivector space, 486 (see also Lagrangian), 594, 598 black hole, 364–433 ADM action, 606 Bondi-Metzner-Sachs group, 240 affine parameter, 77, 79 boost, 110 alternating operation, antisymmetriza- Born-Infeld (or tachyonic) scalar field, tion, 27 467–471 angle field, 44 Boyer-Lindquist coordinate chart, 334, anisotropic fluid, 218–220, 276 399 collapse, 424–431 Brinkman-Robinson-Trautman met- ric, 514 anti-de Sitter space-time, 195, 644, Buchdahl inequality, 262 663–664 bugle, 69 anti-self-dual, 671 antisymmetric oriented tensor, 49 C antisymmetric tensor, 28 canonical energy-momentum-stress ten- antisymmetrization, 27 sor, 119 arc length parameter, 81 canonical or normal forms, 510 arc separation function, 85 Cartesian chart, 44, 68 arc separation parameter, 77 Casimir effect, 638 Arnowitt-Deser-Misner action integral, Cauchy horizon, 403, 416 606 Cauchy problem, 207 atlas, 3 Cauchy-Kowalewski theorem, 207 complete, 3 causal cone, 108 maximal, 3 causal space-time, 663 698 Index 699 causality violation, 663 contravariant index, 51 characteristic hypersurface, 623 contravariant order, 18 characteristic matrix, 625 coordinate chart or system characteristic ordinary differential equa- Boyer-Lindquist, 334, 399 tions, 612 Cartesian, 44, 68 characteristic polynomial equation, 177 comoving, 198 characteristic surface, 619 Doran, 415 charge-current, 125 doubly-null, 130 charged dust, 125, 134, 226, 317 Eddington-Finkelstein, 371, 383 chart, 1 Gaussian normal, 67, 202 Christoffel symbol, 57 geodesic normal, 67, 102, 202 first kind, 57 Kerr-Schild, 414 second kind, 57 Kruskal-Szekeres, 379–380 closed form, 33 local, 1 Codazzi-Mainardi equations, 100 local Minkowskian, 153 commutator or Lie bracket, 40 Minkowskian, 105 comoving coordinate chart, 198 normal or hypersurface orthog- complete atlas, 3 onal, 67 complex conjugate coordinates, 621 orthogonal, 61 complex electromagnetic potential, 356 Painlev´e-Gullstrand,370 complex gravo-electromagnetic poten- pseudo-Cartesian, 45, 68 tial, 356 Regge-Wheeler tortoise, 371 complex null tetrad field, 485 Riemann normal, 67 complex potential, 331–332, 348 Synge’s doubly-null, 372 components Weyl’s, 289 coordinate, 21 Weyl-Lewis- Papapetrou (WLP), covariant, 11 330 orthonormal, 47 coordinate components, 21 physical, 120 coordinate conditions, 165 conformal group, 640 cosmological constant, 163, 233, 435 conformal mapping, 70 cosmological principle, 434 conformal tensor, 71 cotangent vector field, 9 conformally flat domain, 71 cotangent vector space, 9 conformally flat space-time, 149, 639– Cotton-Schouten-York tensor, 309 646 covariant, 52 conformastat metric, 309 covariant components, 11 conformastationary metric, 358 covariant derivative, 51 conjugate holomorphic function, 622 of relative and oriented relative conjugate points, 81 tensor fields, 63 conjugate, contravariant, or inverse covariant index, 51 metric tensor, 44 covariant order, 18 constant curvature, space, 68, 73 covariant vector field, 9 continuity equation, 122, 126, 186, critical energy density, 448 232 critical point, 593 continuum mechanics, 117 curvature invariant, 63 contraction operation, 21 curvature scalar, 63 700 Index curvature tensor, 55 doubly-null coordinates, 130 curve dual vector space, 9 integral, 35 dubiosity, 82 non-null, 81 dust, 122, 125, 134, 185, 186, 216, null, 112 226, 317, 435, 437, 438, 441, parameterized, 11 448, 452, 470 profile, 92 collapse, 383–386 spacelike, 111 timelike, 112 E curved domain, 64 eccentricity, 245 Curzon-Chazy metric, 299 Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates, 371, cusp, 16 383 Eguchi-Hansen gravitational instan- D tons, 671 dark energy, 461 Einstein space, 69 de Sitter space-time, 431, 450, 644 Einstein static universe, 434 deceleration function, 448 Einstein summation convention, 7 deceleration parameter, 448 Einstein tensor, 63 deDonder gauge, 649 Einstein’s field equations, 164 deformable solid, 220–222, 276 complex-valued form, 532 degree (system of p.d.e.s), 611 Einstein-Hilbert Lagrangian density, delta 168 Kronecker, 8 Einstein-Maxwell equations, 224, 263 derivative Einstein-Maxwell-Klein-Gordon equa- covariant, 51, 63 tions, 560 covariant directional, 52 orthonormal form, 565 directional, 7, 52 Einstein-Rosen bridge, 655 exterior, 31 electrical charge density, 125 Fermi, 147 electro-vac universe, 263 gauge covariant, 561 electromagnetic duality-rotation, 233 Lie, 35–38 electromagnetic field tensor, 33, 50 variational, 595, 599 electromagnetic four-potential, 34, 225, derivative mapping, 22 233, 504, 561 determinate system, 166 electromagneto-vac domain, 224 differentiable manifold, 3 electrostatic potential, 319 differential conservation of energy- mo- elementary divisors, 632 mentum, 120 elliptic p.d.e., 618 differential form, 31 embedded manifold, 94 directional derivative, 7 Emden equation, 575 domain energy conditions, 180 curved, 64 energy-momentum-stress tensor, 119 flat, 64 equation of state, 216 dominant energy condition, 181 equilibrium of a deformable body, 221 Doran coordinate chart, 415 equivalence principle, 139 dot product or inner-product, 42 ergosphere, 402 double Hodge-dual, 84 Ernst equation, 333 Index 701 eternal black holes, 418 closed, 33 eternal white holes, 418 differential, 31 Euler equations for a perfect fluid, exact, 33 232 Frenet-Serret formulas, 83 Euler-Lagrange equations, 78, 159, generalized, 82 596 frequency of a wave, 504 classical mechanics, 596 Friedmann-Lemaˆıtre-Robertson-Walker for particle in curved space-time, metrics (or F-L-R-W), 436– 157 471 for particle in Schwarzschild space- time, 242, 243 G for scalar field, 599 G¨odeluniverse, 664–665 event horizon, 367 gauge covariant derivatives, 561 exact form, 33 gauge transformation, 34 expansion scalar, 184 Gauss’ equations, 100 expansion tensor, 184 Gauss’ theorem, generalized, 65 extended extrinsic curvature, 604 Gauss-Bonnet term, 608 extended real numbers, 409 Gaussian curvature, 91 exterior derivative, 31 Gaussian normal coordinate chart, 67, exterior product, 28 202 extrinsic curvature tensor, 89–104, 167 general covariance, 131 extended, 604 general relativity, 168 F generalized D’Alembertian, 222 F-L-R-W metrics (or Friedmann-Lemaˆıtre- generalized Frenet-Serret formulas, 82 Robertson-Walker), 436–471 generalized Kronecker tensor, 29 F-W transport, 147 generalized wave operator, 222 Fermi derivative, 147 geodesic, 76 Fermi-Walker transport, 147 non-null, 77 fifth force, 643 null, 77 fine-structure constant (electrodynamic), geodesic deviation equations, 80 583 geodesic equations, 77 fine-structure parameter (eigenvalue for dust, 186 of charged scalar-wave grav- for particle in T -domain, 369 itational condensate), 583 for particle in Schwarzschild space- Finsler metric, 157 time, 242 first contracted Bianchi’s identities, for the Euclidean plane E2 , 78 63 geodesic normal coordinate chart, 67, first curvature, 147 102, 202 first fundamental form, 91 geodesically complete manifold, 170 Flamm’s paraboloid, 241 geometrized units, 164 flat domain, 64 geons, 591 flat manifold, 67 Global Positioning System (G.P.S.), Fock-deDonder gauge, 649 336 form gravitational constant, G, 66, 162 1-form, 10 gravitational field equations, 163 702 Index gravitational instantons, 351, 667– holomorphic function, 622 671 holonomic constraint, 158 gravitational mass, 138 homeomorphism, 1 gravitational redshift, 250 homogeneity, 442 gravitational wave astronomy, 647 homogeneous p.d.e., 611 gravitational waves, 167, 647–653 homogeneous state of the complex gravitons, 649 wave function, 570 gravo-electromagnetic potential, 356 Hopf’s theorem, 307 group Hubble function, 448 Bondi-Metzner-Sachs, 240 Hubble parameter, 448 conformal, 640 hybrid tensor field, 96–98 Lie, 45 hyperbolic p.d.e., 618 Lorentz, 45, 109 hypersurface, 367 M¨obius,356 null, 131 Poincar´e,109 hypersurface orthogonal coordinate, symplectic, 173 67 group of motion, 73 I H I-S-L-D jump conditions, 167 H-K-S-D metric (or Hawking-Kloster- identity tensor, 46 Som-Das), 670 immersion, 94 Hamilton-Jacobi equation, 615 incoherent dust, 185 Hamiltonian index for particle in a static gravita- contravariant, 51 tional potential, 326 covariant, 51 for particle in an electromagnetic index lowering, 48 field, 160 index raising, 48 relativistic, 158 inertial mass, 138 relativistic equations of motion, inertial observer, 113 160 inflationary era, 446 relativistic mechanics, 158 initial value problem, 207 super, 158 inner-product or dot product, 42 harmonic coordinate conditions, 174 instanton, 351, 667–671 harmonic function, 307, 622 instanton-horizon, 668 harmonic gauge, 174, 649 integrability conditions, 99 Hausdorff manifold, 1 integral conservation, 120 Hawking-Kloster-Som-Das metric (or integral curve, 35 H-K-S-D), 670 intrinsic curvature heat flow vector, 232 extended, 604 Heaviside-Lorentz units, 123 intrinsic metric, 90 Hessian, 616 invariant eigenvalue problem, 91 Higgs fields, 471 invariant eigenvalues, 177 Hilbert-Palatini approach for deriv- irrotational motions, 184 ing field equations, 601 isomorphism, 501 Hodge star operation, 50 on tensor space, 48 Hodge-dual operation, 496 isotropic sectional curvature,
Recommended publications
  • 5-Dimensional Space-Periodic Solutions of the Static Vacuum Einstein Equations
    5-DIMENSIONAL SPACE-PERIODIC SOLUTIONS OF THE STATIC VACUUM EINSTEIN EQUATIONS MARCUS KHURI, GILBERT WEINSTEIN, AND SUMIO YAMADA Abstract. An affirmative answer is given to a conjecture of Myers concerning the existence of 5-dimensional regular static vacuum solutions that balance an infinite number of black holes, which have Kasner asymp- totics. A variety of examples are constructed, having different combinations of ring S1 × S2 and sphere S3 cross-sectional horizon topologies. Furthermore, we show the existence of 5-dimensional vacuum solitons with Kasner asymptotics. These are regular static space-periodic vacuum spacetimes devoid of black holes. Consequently, we also obtain new examples of complete Riemannian manifolds of nonnegative Ricci cur- vature in dimension 4, and zero Ricci curvature in dimension 5, having arbitrarily large as well as infinite second Betti number. 1. Introduction The Majumdar-Papapetrou solutions [14, 16] of the 4D Einstein-Maxwell equations show that gravi- tational attraction and electro-magnetic repulsion may be balanced in order to support multiple black holes in static equilibrium. In [15], Myers generalized these solutions to higher dimensions, and also showed that such balancing is also possible for vacuum black holes in 4 dimensions if an infinite number are aligned properly in a periodic fashion along an axis of symmetry; these 4-dimensional solutions were later rediscovered by Korotkin and Nicolai in [11]. Although the Myers-Korotkin-Nicolai solutions are not asymptotically flat, but rather asymptotically Kasner, they play an integral part in an extended version of static black hole uniqueness given by Peraza and Reiris [17]. It was conjectured in [15] that these vac- uum solutions could be generalized to higher dimensions, possibly with black holes of nontrivial topology.
    [Show full text]
  • Jhep01(2020)007
    Published for SISSA by Springer Received: March 27, 2019 Revised: November 15, 2019 Accepted: December 9, 2019 Published: January 2, 2020 Deformed graded Poisson structures, generalized geometry and supergravity JHEP01(2020)007 Eugenia Boffo and Peter Schupp Jacobs University Bremen, Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: In recent years, a close connection between supergravity, string effective ac- tions and generalized geometry has been discovered that typically involves a doubling of geometric structures. We investigate this relation from the point of view of graded ge- ometry, introducing an approach based on deformations of graded Poisson structures and derive the corresponding gravity actions. We consider in particular natural deformations of the 2-graded symplectic manifold T ∗[2]T [1]M that are based on a metric g, a closed Neveu-Schwarz 3-form H (locally expressed in terms of a Kalb-Ramond 2-form B) and a scalar dilaton φ. The derived bracket formalism relates this structure to the generalized differential geometry of a Courant algebroid, which has the appropriate stringy symme- tries, and yields a connection with non-trivial curvature and torsion on the generalized “doubled” tangent bundle E =∼ TM ⊕ T ∗M. Projecting onto TM with the help of a natural non-isotropic splitting of E, we obtain a connection and curvature invariants that reproduce the NS-NS sector of supergravity in 10 dimensions. Further results include a fully generalized Dorfman bracket, a generalized Lie bracket and new formulas for torsion and curvature tensors associated to generalized tangent bundles.
    [Show full text]
  • Supergravity Pietro Giuseppe Frè Dipartimento Di Fisica Teorica University of Torino Torino, Italy
    Gravity, a Geometrical Course Pietro Giuseppe Frè Gravity, a Geometrical Course Volume 2: Black Holes, Cosmology and Introduction to Supergravity Pietro Giuseppe Frè Dipartimento di Fisica Teorica University of Torino Torino, Italy Additional material to this book can be downloaded from http://extras.springer.com. ISBN 978-94-007-5442-3 ISBN 978-94-007-5443-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5443-0 Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London Library of Congress Control Number: 2012950601 © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center. Violations are liable to prosecution under the respective Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Levi-Civita Tensor Noncovariance and Curvature in the Pseudotensors
    The Levi-Civita tensor noncovariance and curvature in the pseudotensors space A. L. Koshkarov∗ University of Petrozavodsk, Physics department, Russia Abstract It is shown that conventional ”covariant” derivative of the Levi-Civita tensor Eαβµν;ξ is not really covariant. Adding compensative terms, it is possible to make it covariant and to be equal to zero. Then one can be introduced a curvature in the pseudotensors space. There appears a curvature tensor which is dissimilar to ordinary one by covariant term including the Levi-Civita density derivatives hence to be equal to zero. This term is a little bit similar to Weylean one in the Weyl curvature tensor. There has been attempted to find a curvature measure in the combined (tensor plus pseudotensor) tensors space. Besides, there has been constructed some vector from the metric and the Levi-Civita density which gives new opportunities in geometry. 1 Introduction Tensor analysis which General Relativity is based on operates basically with true tensors and it is very little spoken of pseudotensors role. Although there are many objects in the world to be bound up with pseudotensors. For example most of particles and bodies in the Universe have angular momentum or spin. Here is a question: could a curvature tensor be a pseudotensor or include that in some way? It’s not clear. Anyway, symmetries of the Riemann-Christopher tensor are not compatible with those of the Levi-Civita pseudotensor. There are examples of using values in Physics to be a sum of a tensor and arXiv:0906.0647v1 [physics.gen-ph] 3 Jun 2009 a pseudotensor.
    [Show full text]
  • Schwarzschild's Solution And
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server RECONSIDERING SCHWARZSCHILD'S ORIGINAL SOLUTION SALVATORE ANTOCI AND DIERCK EKKEHARD LIEBSCHER Abstract. We analyse the Schwarzschild solution in the context of the historical development of its present use, and explain the invariant definition of the Schwarzschild’s radius as a singular surface, that can be applied to the Kerr-Newman solution too. 1. Introduction: Schwarzschild's solution and the \Schwarzschild" solution Nowadays simply talking about Schwarzschild’s solution requires a pre- liminary reassessment of the historical record as conditio sine qua non for avoiding any misunderstanding. In fact, the present-day reader must be firstly made aware of this seemingly peculiar circumstance: Schwarzschild’s spherically symmetric, static solution [1] to the field equations of the ver- sion of the theory proposed by Einstein [2] at the beginning of November 1915 is different from the “Schwarzschild” solution that is quoted in all the textbooks and in all the research papers. The latter, that will be here al- ways mentioned with quotation marks, was found by Droste, Hilbert and Weyl, who worked instead [3], [4], [5] by starting from the last version [6] of Einstein’s theory.1 As far as the vacuum is concerned, the two versions have identical field equations; they differ only because of the supplementary condition (1.1) det (g )= 1 ik − that, in the theory of November 11th, limited the covariance to the group of unimodular coordinate transformations. Due to this fortuitous circum- stance, Schwarzschild could not simplify his calculations by the choice of the radial coordinate made e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • General Relativity As Taught in 1979, 1983 By
    General Relativity As taught in 1979, 1983 by Joel A. Shapiro November 19, 2015 2. Last Latexed: November 19, 2015 at 11:03 Joel A. Shapiro c Joel A. Shapiro, 1979, 2012 Contents 0.1 Introduction............................ 4 0.2 SpecialRelativity ......................... 7 0.3 Electromagnetism. 13 0.4 Stress-EnergyTensor . 18 0.5 Equivalence Principle . 23 0.6 Manifolds ............................. 28 0.7 IntegrationofForms . 41 0.8 Vierbeins,Connections . 44 0.9 ParallelTransport. 50 0.10 ElectromagnetisminFlatSpace . 56 0.11 GeodesicDeviation . 61 0.12 EquationsDeterminingGeometry . 67 0.13 Deriving the Gravitational Field Equations . .. 68 0.14 HarmonicCoordinates . 71 0.14.1 ThelinearizedTheory . 71 0.15 TheBendingofLight. 77 0.16 PerfectFluids ........................... 84 0.17 Particle Orbits in Schwarzschild Metric . 88 0.18 AnIsotropicUniverse. 93 0.19 MoreontheSchwarzschild Geometry . 102 0.20 BlackHoleswithChargeandSpin. 110 0.21 Equivalence Principle, Fermions, and Fancy Formalism . .115 0.22 QuantizedFieldTheory . .121 3 4. Last Latexed: November 19, 2015 at 11:03 Joel A. Shapiro Note: This is being typed piecemeal in 2012 from handwritten notes in a red looseleaf marked 617 (1983) but may have originated in 1979 0.1 Introduction I am, myself, an elementary particle physicist, and my interest in general relativity has come from the growth of a field of quantum gravity. Because the gravitational inderactions of reasonably small objects are so weak, quantum gravity is a field almost entirely divorced from contact with reality in the form of direct confrontation with experiment. There are three areas of contact 1. In relativistic quantum mechanics, one usually formulates the physical quantities in terms of fields. A field is a physical degree of freedom, or variable, definded at each point of space and time.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:0911.0334V2 [Gr-Qc] 4 Jul 2020
    Classical Physics: Spacetime and Fields Nikodem Poplawski Department of Mathematics and Physics, University of New Haven, CT, USA Preface We present a self-contained introduction to the classical theory of spacetime and fields. This expo- sition is based on the most general principles: the principle of general covariance (relativity) and the principle of least action. The order of the exposition is: 1. Spacetime (principle of general covariance and tensors, affine connection, curvature, metric, tetrad and spin connection, Lorentz group, spinors); 2. Fields (principle of least action, action for gravitational field, matter, symmetries and conservation laws, gravitational field equations, spinor fields, electromagnetic field, action for particles). In this order, a particle is a special case of a field existing in spacetime, and classical mechanics can be derived from field theory. I dedicate this book to my Parents: Bo_zennaPop lawska and Janusz Pop lawski. I am also grateful to Chris Cox for inspiring this book. The Laws of Physics are simple, beautiful, and universal. arXiv:0911.0334v2 [gr-qc] 4 Jul 2020 1 Contents 1 Spacetime 5 1.1 Principle of general covariance and tensors . 5 1.1.1 Vectors . 5 1.1.2 Tensors . 6 1.1.3 Densities . 7 1.1.4 Contraction . 7 1.1.5 Kronecker and Levi-Civita symbols . 8 1.1.6 Dual densities . 8 1.1.7 Covariant integrals . 9 1.1.8 Antisymmetric derivatives . 9 1.2 Affine connection . 10 1.2.1 Covariant differentiation of tensors . 10 1.2.2 Parallel transport . 11 1.2.3 Torsion tensor . 11 1.2.4 Covariant differentiation of densities .
    [Show full text]
  • Geometric Horizons ∗ Alan A
    Physics Letters B 771 (2017) 131–135 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Physics Letters B www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb Geometric horizons ∗ Alan A. Coley a, David D. McNutt b, , Andrey A. Shoom c a Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 3J5, Canada b Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Stavanger, N-4036 Stavanger, Norway c Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Memorial University, St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1C 5S7, Canada a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: We discuss black hole spacetimes with a geometrically defined quasi-local horizon on which the Received 21 February 2017 curvature tensor is algebraically special relative to the alignment classification. Based on many examples Accepted 2 May 2017 and analytical results, we conjecture that a spacetime horizon is always more algebraically special (in Available online 19 May 2017 all of the orders of specialization) than other regions of spacetime. Using recent results in invariant Editor: M. Trodden theory, such geometric black hole horizons can be identified by the alignment type II or D discriminant conditions in terms of scalar curvature invariants, which are not dependent on spacetime foliations. The above conjecture is, in fact, a suite of conjectures (isolated vs dynamical horizon; four vs higher dimensions; zeroth order invariants vs higher order differential invariants). However, we are particularly interested in applications in four dimensions and especially the location of a black hole in numerical computations. © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Differentiable Manifolds
    Gerardo F. Torres del Castillo Differentiable Manifolds ATheoreticalPhysicsApproach Gerardo F. Torres del Castillo Instituto de Ciencias Universidad Autónoma de Puebla Ciudad Universitaria 72570 Puebla, Puebla, Mexico [email protected] ISBN 978-0-8176-8270-5 e-ISBN 978-0-8176-8271-2 DOI 10.1007/978-0-8176-8271-2 Springer New York Dordrecht Heidelberg London Library of Congress Control Number: 2011939950 Mathematics Subject Classification (2010): 22E70, 34C14, 53B20, 58A15, 70H05 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012 All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights. Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.birkhauser-science.com) Preface The aim of this book is to present in an elementary manner the basic notions related with differentiable manifolds and some of their applications, especially in physics. The book is aimed at advanced undergraduate and graduate students in physics and mathematics, assuming a working knowledge of calculus in several variables, linear algebra, and differential equations.
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Geometry: Curvature and Holonomy Austin Christian
    University of Texas at Tyler Scholar Works at UT Tyler Math Theses Math Spring 5-5-2015 Differential Geometry: Curvature and Holonomy Austin Christian Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uttyler.edu/math_grad Part of the Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Christian, Austin, "Differential Geometry: Curvature and Holonomy" (2015). Math Theses. Paper 5. http://hdl.handle.net/10950/266 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Math at Scholar Works at UT Tyler. It has been accepted for inclusion in Math Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholar Works at UT Tyler. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY: CURVATURE AND HOLONOMY by AUSTIN CHRISTIAN A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Mathematics David Milan, Ph.D., Committee Chair College of Arts and Sciences The University of Texas at Tyler May 2015 c Copyright by Austin Christian 2015 All rights reserved Acknowledgments There are a number of people that have contributed to this project, whether or not they were aware of their contribution. For taking me on as a student and learning differential geometry with me, I am deeply indebted to my advisor, David Milan. Without himself being a geometer, he has helped me to develop an invaluable intuition for the field, and the freedom he has afforded me to study things that I find interesting has given me ample room to grow. For introducing me to differential geometry in the first place, I owe a great deal of thanks to my undergraduate advisor, Robert Huff; our many fruitful conversations, mathematical and otherwise, con- tinue to affect my approach to mathematics.
    [Show full text]
  • WHAT IS Q-CURVATURE? 1. Introduction Throughout His Distinguished Research Career, Tom Branson Was Fascinated by Con- Formal
    WHAT IS Q-CURVATURE? S.-Y. ALICE CHANG, MICHAEL EASTWOOD, BENT ØRSTED, AND PAUL C. YANG In memory of Thomas P. Branson (1953–2006). Abstract. Branson’s Q-curvature is now recognized as a fundamental quantity in conformal geometry. We outline its construction and present its basic properties. 1. Introduction Throughout his distinguished research career, Tom Branson was fascinated by con- formal differential geometry and made several substantial contributions to this field. There is no doubt, however, that his favorite was the notion of Q-curvature. In this article we outline the construction and basic properties of Branson’s Q-curvature. As a Riemannian invariant, defined on even-dimensional manifolds, there is apparently nothing special about Q. On a surface Q is essentially the Gaussian curvature. In 4 dimensions there is a simple but unrevealing formula (4.1) for Q. In 6 dimensions an explicit formula is already quite difficult. What is truly remarkable, however, is how Q interacts with conformal, i.e. angle-preserving, transformations. We shall suppose that the reader is familiar with the basics of Riemannian differ- ential geometry but a few remarks on notation are in order. Sometimes, we shall write gab for a metric and ∇a for the corresponding connection. Let us write Rab and R for the Ricci and scalar curvatures, respectively. We shall use the metric to ‘raise and lower’ indices in the usual fashion and adopt the summation convention whereby one implicitly sums over repeated indices. Using these conventions, the Laplacian is ab a the differential operator ∆ ≡ g ∇a∇b = ∇ ∇a. A conformal structure on a smooth manifold is a metric defined only up to smoothly varying scale.
    [Show full text]
  • DISCRETE DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY: an APPLIED INTRODUCTION Keenan Crane • CMU 15-458/858 LECTURE 10: INTRODUCTION to CURVES
    DISCRETE DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY: AN APPLIED INTRODUCTION Keenan Crane • CMU 15-458/858 LECTURE 10: INTRODUCTION TO CURVES DISCRETE DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY: AN APPLIED INTRODUCTION Keenan Crane • CMU 15-458/858 Curves & Surfaces •Much of the geometry we encounter in life well-described by curves and surfaces* (Curves) *Or solids… but the boundary of a solid is a surface! (Surfaces) Much Ado About Manifolds • In general, differential geometry studies n-dimensional manifolds; we’ll focus on low dimensions: curves (n=1), surfaces (n=2), and volumes (n=3) • Why? Geometry we encounter in everyday life/applications • Low-dimensional manifolds are not “baby stuff!” • n=1: unknot recognition (open as of 2021) • n=2: Willmore conjecture (2012 for genus 1) • n=3: Geometrization conjecture (2003, $1 million) • Serious intuition gained by studying low-dimensional manifolds • Conversely, problems involving very high-dimensional manifolds (e.g., data analysis/machine learning) involve less “deep” geometry than you might imagine! • fiber bundles, Lie groups, curvature flows, spinors, symplectic structure, ... • Moreover, curves and surfaces are beautiful! (And in some cases, high- dimensional manifolds have less interesting structure…) Smooth Descriptions of Curves & Surfaces •Many ways to express the geometry of a curve or surface: •height function over tangent plane •local parameterization •Christoffel symbols — coordinates/indices •differential forms — “coordinate free” •moving frames — change in adapted frame •Riemann surfaces (local); Quaternionic functions
    [Show full text]