Oral History Whipple.Fm

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Oral History Whipple.Fm Meteoritics & Planetary Science 39, Supplement, A199–A213 (2004) Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org Report Oral histories in meteoritics and planetary science: XIII: Fred L. Whipple Ursula B. MARVIN Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA E-mail: [email protected] (Received 13 June 2004) Abstract–Born in Red Oak, Iowa, in 1906, Fred Lawrence Whipple earned his Ph.D. in astronomy at the University of California at Berkeley in 1931. He immediately accepted a position at the Harvard College Observatory and remained at Harvard throughout his career. In 1950, he was appointed to the Phillips Professorship in the Department of Astronomy, and in 1955, he began serving concurrently as the Director of the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory when it moved from Washington, D.C. to Cambridge, Massachusetts. In the 1930s, Whipple established the Harvard Meteor Project in which two cameras, 26 miles apart, simultaneously photographed the same meteors, for which he invariably derived elliptical orbits indicative of their origin within the solar system. In 1950, Whipple introduced his “dirty snowball” model of comet nuclei, which soon became widely accepted and was fully confirmed in 1986 by close-up images of comet Halley taken by the European Space Agency’s Giotto spacecraft. Keenly anticipating the orbiting of satellites during the International Geophysical Year (July 1, 1957-December 31, 1958), Whipple won contracts to build a worldwide network of telescopic cameras for satellite tracking. At least one of the cameras was ready in time to photograph the Soviet Union’s Sputnik I satellite in October 1957, and all 12 stations were in operation by midsummer of 1958. For his leadership role in this project, President John Kennedy honored Fred L. Whipple in June 1963 with the President’s Award for Distinguished Public Service. In the 1960s, Whipple collaborated with astronomers at the University of Arizona to build a new observatory on Mt. Hopkins, 40 miles south of Tucson. Two of the most innovative instruments installed there for astrophysical research were the world’s largest gamma-ray detector and the Multiple-Mirror Telescope. In 1982, the Mt. Hopkins Observatory was rededicated as the Fred Lawrence Whipple Observatory. Although he retired in 1973, Whipple was present at the dedication and until 2003, he continued to actively participate in research projects. At present, he is anticipating the return of the Stardust mission to comet Wild 2, which will bring back to Earth samples of the comet and of interstellar dust. It is scheduled to arrive in 2006, the year of Fred Whipple’s 100th birthday. Among his many honors, Fred Whipple received the Leonard Medal from the Meteoritical Society in 1970 at its meeting hosted by the Goddard Space Flight Center, in Skyland, Virginia. UBM: Fred, in 1927 you earned your BA degree in most boring thing I could imagine. I wanted to go on in mathematics at UCLA, but then you went on to graduate astronomy, but UCLA had no Department of Astronomy at school in astronomy. How did that come about? Did you, by that time. Leonard had started teaching there in 1922, but it any chance, take an astronomy course with Frederick C. took him ten years to persuade the administration to institute Leonard? a degree-granting Astronomy Department. FLW: Yes, that is exactly what I did. In my junior year, I UBM: So you went to Berkeley. took an astronomy course with Leonard and found it to be FLW: Yes, Leonard advised me to apply and helped me to extremely interesting. When I graduated, I decided that to win a teaching fellowship at Berkeley. I got my Ph.D. in 1931. become a professor of mathematics would be just about the UBM: What was your thesis topic? A199 © Meteoritical Society, 2003. Printed in USA. A200 U. B. Marvin considered galaxies to be his own topic and he didn’t care to have any competition. UBM: When was it that you examined 70,000 sky-survey photographic plates using a hand lens and discovered six new comets that never had been recognized in the sky? FLW: That was in the mid-1930s when I was the curator of the observatory’s astronomical plate stacks. UBM: I believe that effort brought you honors. FLW: Yes, each of my new comets brought me a Donahue Medal from the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. UBM: When did you begin studying meteors and meteor streams? FLW: They always interested me but I got my first real chance to work on them soon after I came to Harvard. I wanted to find out where the meteor streams were coming from. I also was interested in comets and their possible relationship to meteors. We knew that most meteors follow elliptical orbits showing that they originate within the solar system, but some observers, particularly the Estonian astronomer, Ernst J. Öpik, who was a visiting scientist at the Harvard Observatory from 1930 to 1934, were reporting hyperbolic meteors. I wanted to find out if there really were any. UBM: Hyperbolic meteors would come in from interstellar space and simply continue on out of the solar system after one swing past the Sun. FLW: That’s right. And meteors in hyperbolic orbits should have higher velocities than those in elliptical orbits. UBM: How did you go about studying meteors? Fig. 1. Fred L. Whipple about 1968. (Courtesy of the photographer, FLW: In 1936, I established a system of using telescopic Babette Whipple.) cameras to take simultaneous photographs of the same areas of the sky from two sites: the Harvard College Observatory in FLW: I worked on variable stars with Donald Menzel, Cambridge and the Oak Ridge Observatory, 26 miles to the who held an appointment as an astrophysicist at the Lick west in the town of Harvard, Massachusetts. I fitted rotating Observatory. shutters with synchronous motors onto the two telescopes to UBM: Did you come to Harvard as soon as you got your determine meteor velocities and rates of deceleration due to doctorate? atmospheric drag. FLW: Yes, I did. In 1931, I accepted an offer from UBM: Is this what became known as the Harvard Meteor Harlow Shapely, the Director of the Harvard College Project? Observatory, to serve as head of the observing program. The FLW: Yes, and it continued on for more than 20 years. observatory was, and still is, Harvard’s only separately From the beginning, every instance in which both cameras endowed unit that is independent of the university deans. The photographed the same meteor trail simultaneously, I found following year, 1932, I was appointed an Instructor in the that the exposure limits included an elliptical solution. Department of Astronomy, which is located under the same UBM: But Öpik remained unimpressed? roof as the observatory. Both were small organizations back FLW: Yes, he did. Öpik had designed a very clever device then. Six years later, in 1938, I advanced to the status of a he called a “rocking camera” which convinced him he was Lecturer on Astronomy. seeing some meteors with hyperbolic velocities. He could be UBM: When did Menzel come east to Harvard? very sarcastic about my insistence on elliptical orbits. In FLW: Menzel came to the observatory in 1932, as the 1932, Harlow Shapley sponsored an expedition for observing resident astrophysicist. He was appointed as Harvard’s first meteors in the clear, dark skies of New Mexico. Öpik went on Professor of Astrophysics in 1938, and he succeeded Harlow it and reported measuring hyperbolic meteors. Although Öpik Shapley as Director of Harvard College Observatory in 1954. was one of the most brilliant astrophysicists in the world, he UBM: Did you continue your research on variable stars stuck to his hyperbolic meteors until 1959 when he concluded at Harvard? he was mistaken about them. I am not sure just what it was FLW: Yes, Shapley encouraged me to work on them. I that changed his mind, but he wrote a nice letter to me also wrote a paper on galaxies, but I soon learned that Shapley apologizing for his years of stubborn opposition. Oral history: F. L. Whipple A201 UBM: From the late 1930s onward, Lincoln LaPaz also would have to add meteorites from the Moon and Mars as reported observing hyperbolic meteors. I believe that during planetoidal types. and after the War, he was using radar as well as optical LaPaz and I continued to disagree about hyperbolic techniques. meteors for another five years or so until he stopped coming FLW: He was. And LaPaz was very positive of his to meetings and publishing papers. That was a loss to us results. I don’t remember that he ever changed his mind. For because, on the whole, he had been a strong, mostly positive years, LaPaz accused me of withholding crucial evidence of influence in meteoritics. hyperbolic meteors when I did not loan him certain UBM: Did your consistent measurements of elliptical photographic plates that were archived at the Harvard orbits imply an asteroidal origin for most meteors? Observatory. I explained that those plate exposures were one FLW: No, because the velocities I was measuring hour long and the instants of the images had no measure of the suggested that many of the grains were of loose, fragile time on them, so you could use them to calculate a range of material, more likely to come from comets than from orbits with no assurance of being correct. He did not accept asteroids. All established comet orbits are elliptical; this explanation and neither did Frederick Leonard, who had beginning with the long-period one that Edmond Halley become a great friend of LaPaz.
Recommended publications
  • Ernst Zinner, Lithic Astronomer
    UCLA UCLA Previously Published Works Title Ernst Zinner, lithic astronomer Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0gq43750 Journal Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 42(7/8) ISSN 1086-9379 Author Mckeegan, Kevin D. Publication Date 2007-07-01 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Meteoritics & Planetary Science 42, Nr 7/8, 1045–1054 (2007) Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org Ernst Zinner, lithic astronomer Kevin D. MCKEEGAN Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095–1567, USA E-mail: [email protected] It is a rare privilege to be one of the founders of an entirely new field of science, and it is especially remarkable when that new field belongs to the oldest branch of “natural philosophy.” The nature of the stars has perplexed and fascinated humanity for millennia. While the sources of their luminosity and their structures and evolution were revealed over the last century, it is thanks to the pioneering efforts of a rare and remarkable man, Ernst Zinner, as well as his colleagues and students (mostly at the University of Chicago and at Washington University in Saint Louis), that in the last two decades it has become possible to literally hold a piece of a star in one’s hand. Armed with sophisticated microscopes and mass spectrometers of various sorts, these “lithic astronomers” are able to reveal stellar processes in exquisite detail by examining the chemical, mineralogical, and especially the nuclear properties of these microscopic grains of stardust. With this special issue of Meteoritics & Planetary Science, we honor Ernst Zinner (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Origins of Life: Transition from Geochemistry to Biogeochemistry
    December 2016 Volume 12, Number 6 ISSN 1811-5209 Origins of Life: Transition from Geochemistry to Biogeochemistry NITA SAHAI and HUSSEIN KADDOUR, Guest Editors Transition from Geochemistry to Biogeochemistry Staging Life: Warm Seltzer Ocean Incubating Life: Prebiotic Sources Foundation Stones to Life Prebiotic Metal-Organic Catalysts Protometabolism and Early Protocells pub_elements_oct16_1300&icpms_Mise en page 1 13-Sep-16 3:39 PM Page 1 Reproducibility High Resolution igh spatial H Resolution High mass The New Generation Ion Microprobe for Path-breaking Advances in Geoscience U-Pb dating in 91500 zircon, RF-plasma O- source Addressing the growing demand for small scale, high resolution, in situ isotopic measurements at high precision and productivity, CAMECA introduces the IMS 1300-HR³, successor of the internationally acclaimed IMS 1280-HR, and KLEORA which is derived from the IMS 1300-HR³ and is fully optimized for advanced U-Th-Pb mineral dating. • New high brightness RF-plasma ion source greatly improving spatial resolution, reproducibility and throughput • New automated sample loading system with motorized sample height adjustment, significantly increasing analysis precision, ease-of-use and productivity • New UV-light microscope for enhanced optical image resolution (developed by University of Wisconsin, USA) ... and more! Visit www.cameca.com or email [email protected] to request IMS 1300-HR³ and KLEORA product brochures. Laser-Ablation ICP-MS ~ now with CAMECA ~ The Attom ES provides speed and sensitivity optimized for the most demanding LA-ICP-MS applications. Corr. Pb 207-206 - U (238) Recent advances in laser ablation technology have improved signal 2SE error per sample - Pb (206) Combined samples 0.076121 +/- 0.002345 - Pb (207) to background ratios and washout times.
    [Show full text]
  • Stardust Sample Return
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Stardust Sample Return Press Kit January 2006 www.nasa.gov Contacts Merrilee Fellows Policy/Program Management (818) 393-0754 NASA Headquarters, Washington DC Agle Stardust Mission (818) 393-9011 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. Vince Stricherz Science Investigation (206) 543-2580 University of Washington, Seattle, Wash. Contents General Release ............................................................................................................... 3 Media Services Information ……………………….................…………….................……. 5 Quick Facts …………………………………………..................………....…........…....….. 6 Mission Overview …………………………………….................……….....……............…… 7 Recovery Timeline ................................................................................................ 18 Spacecraft ………………………………………………..................…..……...........……… 20 Science Objectives …………………………………..................……………...…..........….. 28 Why Stardust?..................…………………………..................………….....………............... 31 Other Comet Missions .......................................................................................... 33 NASA's Discovery Program .................................................................................. 36 Program/Project Management …………………………........................…..…..………...... 40 1 2 GENERAL RELEASE: NASA PREPARES FOR RETURN OF INTERSTELLAR CARGO NASA’s Stardust mission is nearing Earth after a 2.88 billion mile round-trip journey
    [Show full text]
  • October 2020
    The Newsletter of Westchester Amateur Astronomers October 2020 Pelican Nebula (IC 5070 and 5067) by Olivier Prache Imaged from Olivier’s observatory in Pleasantville. Borg 101ED and ZWO ASI071MC one-shot-color camera using an Optolong L-Enhance filter. Three hours of five-minute subs (unguided) and a bit of work with PixInsight. SERVING THE ASTRONOMY COMMUNITY SINCE 1986 1 Westchester Amateur Astronomers SkyWAAtch October 2020 WAA October Meeting WAA November Meeting Friday, October 2 at 7:30 pm Friday, November at 6 7:30 pm On-line via Zoom On-line via Zoom Intelligent Nighttime Lighting: The Many BLACK HOLES: Not so black? Benefits of Dark Skies Willie Yee Charles Fulco Recent years have seen major breakthroughs in the Science educator Charles Fulco will discuss the meth- study of black holes, including the first image of a ods and many benefits of reducing light pollution, black hole from the Event Horizon Telescope and the including energy and tax dollar savings, health bene- detection of black hole collisions with the Laser fits and of course seeing the Milky Way again. Invita- Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory. tions and log-in instructions will be sent to WAA Dr. Yee, a NASA Solar System Ambassador and Past members via email. President of the Mid-Hudson Astronomical Association, will review the basic science of black Starway to Heaven holes and the myths surrounding them, and present Ward Pound Ridge Reservation, the recent findings of these projects. Cross River, NY Call: 1-877-456-5778 (toll free) for announcements, Scheduled for Oct 10th (rain/cloud date Oct 17).
    [Show full text]
  • Discoveries of Mass Independent Isotope Effects in the Solar System: Past, Present and Future Mark H
    Reviews in Mineralogy & Geochemistry Vol. 86 pp. 35–95, 2021 2 Copyright © Mineralogical Society of America Discoveries of Mass Independent Isotope Effects in the Solar System: Past, Present and Future Mark H. Thiemens Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry University of California San Diego La Jolla, California 92093 USA [email protected] Mang Lin State Key Laboratory of Isotope Geochemistry Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640 China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100049 China [email protected] THE BEGINNING OF ISOTOPES Discovery and chemical physics The history of the discovery of stable isotopes and later, their influence of chemical and physical phenomena originates in the 19th century with discovery of radioactivity by Becquerel in 1896 (Becquerel 1896a–g). The discovery catalyzed a range of studies in physics to develop an understanding of the nucleus and the properties influencing its stability and instability that give rise to various decay modes and associated energies. Rutherford and Soddy (1903) later suggested that radioactive change from different types of decay are linked to chemical change. Soddy later found that this is a general phenomenon and radioactive decay of different energies and types are linked to the same element. Soddy (1913) in his paper on intra-atomic charge pinpointed the observations as requiring the observations of the simultaneous character of chemical change from the same position in the periodic chart with radiative emissions required it to be of the same element (same proton number) but differing atomic weight. This is only energetically accommodated by a change in neutrons and it was this paper that the name “isotope” emerges.
    [Show full text]
  • 1968 Oct 8-10 Council Minutes
    Minutes of the Council Meeting of the Meteoritical Society October 8, 1968 Hoffman Geological Laboratory Harvard University Cambridge The meeting was convened at 2:15 p.m. with President Carleton B. Moore presiding. In attendance were Vice Presidents Barandon Barringer, Robert S. Dietz and John A. O'Keefe, Secretary Roy S. Clarke, Jr., Treasurer Ursula B. Marvin, Editor Dorrit Hoffleit, Past President Peter M. Millman, and Councilors Richard Barringer, Kurt Fredriksson, Gerald S. Hawkins, Klaus Keil, Brian H. Mason and John A. Wood. Robin Brett, John T. Wasson and Fred L. Whipple attended the meeting as visitors. Minutes The minutes of the Council meeting held at the Holiday Inn, Mountain View California, on October 24, 1967, were approved as submitted. Program, 31st Annual Meeting Ursula Marvin presented the program for the Annual Meeting and discussed arrangements and last minute changes. The Council unanimously approved the program as presented and thanked Mrs. Marvin and her coworkers for their efforts on behalf of the Society. Secretary's Report The report of the Secretary was submitted to the Council in writing and was accepted as submitted (copy attached). There was brief discussion of the nomenclature problem of Barringer Meteor Crater. It was pointed out that in the final analysis usage determines the name that becomes accepted. It was suggested that Society members use the name Barringer Meteor Crater in speaking and writing and that we encourage others to do the same. No other action was suggested at this time. The problem of dues for foreign members was discussed, and several individuals suggested that funds are available to help in cases of demonstrated need.
    [Show full text]
  • The Meteoritical Society Newsletter 2001
    SUPPLEMENT TO METEORITICS & PLANETARY SCIENCE, VOL. 36, 11 The Meteoritical Society Newsletter (November 2001) A report of the business carried out by the Society over the past year, edited by Edward Scott, Secretary. PRESIDENT'S EDITORIAL Nomenclature President's Editorial Gero Kurat There are some indications that SNC meteorites could originate from Mars, there are others that relate them to carbonaceous Things usually turn out somewhat different from what one expects chondrites. Among the advocates for a martian origin is also the them to be and this was exactly so also with my first few months in foremost expert on these meteorites, Hap McSween. Some colleagues office. I was positively surprised by the amount of activities initiated neglect the possibility that SNC meteorites could not come from Mars by members of our Society. The overwhelmingly constructive and call them "martian meteorites". Others prefer to call them contributions make investing time for the Society a joy. There are, "SNICs", for obvious reasons. Hap has this year been honored for however, also some unsolved problems which do not create instant his work on "martian meteorites". As the possibility for a non-martian joy but whose solution eventually could lead to improvements origin of SNC meteorites still exists, a curious conundrum emerges: beneficial for all of us. So joy is awaiting us afterwards. Us means how could Hap have done this wonderful work on something that the Council and in particular the Secretary of the Society who does possibly does not exist? Please help us to solve that riddle—the best an excellent job in spite of the bumpy communication between our three solutions will receive prizes.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Leonard Medal for Joseph I. Goldstein
    2005 Leonard Medal for Joseph I. Goldstein Item Type Article; text Authors Rubin, Alan Citation Rubin, A. (2005). 2005 Leonard Medal for Joseph I. Goldstein. Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 40(Supplement), A5-A6. DOI 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2005.tb00418.x Publisher The Meteoritical Society Journal Meteoritics & Planetary Science Rights Copyright © The Meteoritical Society Download date 01/10/2021 07:56:30 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final published version Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/656695 Meteoritics & Planetary Science 40, Supplement, A5–A6 page (2005) Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org Award 2005 Leonard Medal for Joseph I. Goldstein To tell the truth, I was a bit bewildered when I was assigned the task of giving the citation for Joe Goldstein for the Leonard Medal. Who was this guy? We had never worked in the same research group and had never published a paper together. I thought I had occasionally seen him in Houston at the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, but never after Wednesday. I asked one of the postdocs in our group at UCLA who Goldstein was, but he had no idea. Now it began to make sense. Goldstein was just another Leonard medallist no one had ever heard of. I reasoned that he must be some Meteoritical Society apparatchik working his way through the ranks. This suspicion was confirmed when I found out that he is a former treasurer of the society and currently its vice- president—a man obviously being groomed for the top spot. So, to complete my assignment, I did what any modern investigator would do.
    [Show full text]
  • Error Statistics of Asteroid Optical Astrometric Observations
    Icarus 166 (2003) 248–270 www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus Error statistics of asteroid optical astrometric observations Mario Carpino,a,∗ Andrea Milani,b andStevenR.Chesleyc a Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, via Brera, 28, 20121 Milan, Italy b Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Pisa, Via Buonarroti, 2, 56127 Pisa, Italy c Navigation & Mission Design Section, MS 301-150, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA Received 29 May 2001; revised 25 October 2002 Abstract Astrometric uncertainty is a crucial component of the asteroid orbit determination process. However, in the absence of rigorous uncer- tainty information, only very crude weighting schemes are available to the orbit computer. This inevitably leads to a correspondingly crude characterization of the orbital uncertainty and in many cases to less accurate orbits. In this paper we describe a method for carefully assessing the statistical performance of the various observatories that have produced asteroid astrometry, with the ultimate goal of using this statistical characterization to improve asteroid orbit determination. We also include a detailed description of our previously unpublished automatic outlier rejection algorithm used in the orbit determination, which is an important component of the fitting process. To start this study we have determined the best fitting orbits for the first 17,349 numbered asteroids and computed the corresponding O–C astrometric residuals for all observations used in the orbit fitting. We group the residuals into roughly homogeneous bins and compute the root mean square (RMS) error and bias in declination and right ascension for each bin. Results are tabulated for each of the 77 bins containing more than 3000 observations; this comprises roughly two thirds of the data, but only 2% of the bins.
    [Show full text]
  • Index to JRASC Volumes 61-90 (PDF)
    THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF CANADA GENERAL INDEX to the JOURNAL 1967–1996 Volumes 61 to 90 inclusive (including the NATIONAL NEWSLETTER, NATIONAL NEWSLETTER/BULLETIN, and BULLETIN) Compiled by Beverly Miskolczi and David Turner* * Editor of the Journal 1994–2000 Layout and Production by David Lane Published by and Copyright 2002 by The Royal Astronomical Society of Canada 136 Dupont Street Toronto, Ontario, M5R 1V2 Canada www.rasc.ca — [email protected] Table of Contents Preface ....................................................................................2 Volume Number Reference ...................................................3 Subject Index Reference ........................................................4 Subject Index ..........................................................................7 Author Index ..................................................................... 121 Abstracts of Papers Presented at Annual Meetings of the National Committee for Canada of the I.A.U. (1967–1970) and Canadian Astronomical Society (1971–1996) .......................................................................168 Abstracts of Papers Presented at the Annual General Assembly of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada (1969–1996) ...........................................................207 JRASC Index (1967-1996) Page 1 PREFACE The last cumulative Index to the Journal, published in 1971, was compiled by Ruth J. Northcott and assembled for publication by Helen Sawyer Hogg. It included all articles published in the Journal during the interval 1932–1966, Volumes 26–60. In the intervening years the Journal has undergone a variety of changes. In 1970 the National Newsletter was published along with the Journal, being bound with the regular pages of the Journal. In 1978 the National Newsletter was physically separated but still included with the Journal, and in 1989 it became simply the Newsletter/Bulletin and in 1991 the Bulletin. That continued until the eventual merger of the two publications into the new Journal in 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 1311 Discoverers in Alphabetical Order
    Appendix 1 1311 Discoverers in Alphabetical Order Abe, H. 28 (8) 1993-1999 Bernstein, G. 1 1998 Abe, M. 1 (1) 1994 Bettelheim, E. 1 (1) 2000 Abraham, M. 3 (3) 1999 Bickel, W. 443 1995-2010 Aikman, G. C. L. 4 1994-1998 Biggs, J. 1 2001 Akiyama, M. 16 (10) 1989-1999 Bigourdan, G. 1 1894 Albitskij, V. A. 10 1923-1925 Billings, G. W. 6 1999 Aldering, G. 4 1982 Binzel, R. P. 3 1987-1990 Alikoski, H. 13 1938-1953 Birkle, K. 8 (8) 1989-1993 Allen, E. J. 1 2004 Birtwhistle, P. 56 2003-2009 Allen, L. 2 2004 Blasco, M. 5 (1) 1996-2000 Alu, J. 24 (13) 1987-1993 Block, A. 1 2000 Amburgey, L. L. 2 1997-2000 Boattini, A. 237 (224) 1977-2006 Andrews, A. D. 1 1965 Boehnhardt, H. 1 (1) 1993 Antal, M. 17 1971-1988 Boeker, A. 1 (1) 2002 Antolini, P. 4 (3) 1994-1996 Boeuf, M. 12 1998-2000 Antonini, P. 35 1997-1999 Boffin, H. M. J. 10 (2) 1999-2001 Aoki, M. 2 1996-1997 Bohrmann, A. 9 1936-1938 Apitzsch, R. 43 2004-2009 Boles, T. 1 2002 Arai, M. 45 (45) 1988-1991 Bonomi, R. 1 (1) 1995 Araki, H. 2 (2) 1994 Borgman, D. 1 (1) 2004 Arend, S. 51 1929-1961 B¨orngen, F. 535 (231) 1961-1995 Armstrong, C. 1 (1) 1997 Borrelly, A. 19 1866-1894 Armstrong, M. 2 (1) 1997-1998 Bourban, G. 1 (1) 2005 Asami, A. 7 1997-1999 Bourgeois, P. 1 1929 Asher, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Thursday, October 11, 2012 INSTRUMENTATION for in SITU ANALYSIS MISSIONS (VENUS in SITU EXPLORER, TITAN, ETC.) I 8:30 A.M
    International Workshop on Instrumentation for Planetary Missions (2012) sess202.pdf Thursday, October 11, 2012 INSTRUMENTATION FOR IN SITU ANALYSIS MISSIONS (VENUS IN SITU EXPLORER, TITAN, ETC.) I 8:30 a.m. Building 34 — Conference Room 150 Chairs: Regis Courtin Shahid Aslam 9:00 a.m. Kraft R. P. * Kenter A. T. Alcock C. R. Murray S. S. Gauron T. M. Loose M. Werner M. Technology Development for the Whipple Mission Concept — Present Status and Future Work [1071] The Whipple mission was proposed to the 2010 Discovery program and funded for technology development. Whipple will conduct the first direct study of the outer solar system using a blind occultation survey. We discuss the status of our project. 9:15 a.m. Kobayashi M. * Shibata H. Nogami K. Fujii M. Miyachi T. Ohashi H. Sasaki S. Iwai T. Hattori M. Kimura H. Hirai T. Takechi S. Yano H. Hasegawa S. Srama R. Grün E. Mercury Dust Monitor for the BepiColombo MMO [1067] Mercury Dust Monitor (MDM) onboard the Mercury Magnetosphere Orbiter (MMO) will observe dust particles in orbit around Mercury during 1 year as nominal operation. In this paper, we report an overview of our instrument onboard the Bepi-Colombo MMO. 9:30 a.m. Reuter D. C. * Simon-Miller A. A. The OVIRS Visible/IR Spectrometer on the OSIRIS-Rex Mission [1074] This paper describes the OSIRIS-REx Visible and Infrared Spectrometer (OVIRS), a 0.4 to 4.3 µm point spectrometer on the the OSIRIS-REx (Origins Spectral Interpretation Resource Identification Security Regolith Explorer) mission. 9:45 a.m. Robinson M.
    [Show full text]