DOCSLIB.ORG

Amb R. Rajagopalan on India's Foreign Policy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Amb R. Rajagopalan on India's Foreign Policy India’s Foreign Policy A Panorama Some Vignettes from the Past and the Present R. Rajagopalan August 9, 2019 1 What is Foreign Policy? The policy of a sovereign state in its interaction with other sovereign states 2 A country's foreign policy, consists of self- interest strategies chosen by the state to safeguard its national interests * and to achieve goals within its international relations milieu. [* May include values, ideologies and traditions] 3 Foreign Policy & Diplomacy General objectives that guide the activities and relationships of one state in its interactions with other states. The development of foreign policy is influenced by domestic considerations,, the policies or behaviour of other states, or plans to advance specific geopolitical designs. Diplomacy is the tool of foreign policy, and war, alliances, and international trade may all be manifestations of it. 4 Strategic Culture in India The Lament The debate about the existence of strategic culture in India, views are often rudimentary and impulsive rather than based on an objective definition and understanding. The main reason for this is a lack of research and availability of literature on these dimensions . ... .An awareness of the distinction and essential relationship between strategic thinking (philosophical and intellectual discourse) and strategic culture (experience, action, attitude and habit) is also important in the process of this investigation. IDSA Conference on ‘Exploring the Roots of India's Strategic Culture’, October 5, 2017 -Concept note 5 India’s Strategic Culture Rodney W. Jones India’s strategic culture is not monolithic, rather is mosaic-like, but as a composite is more distinct and coherent than that of most contemporary nation- states.This is due to its substantial continuity with the symbolism of pre-modern Indian state systems and threads of Hindu or Vedic civilization dating back several millennia. Embedded in educated social elites, the consciousness of Hindu values has been resident in essentially the same territorial space, namely, the Indian subcontinent. This continuity of values was battered and overlaid but never severed or completely submerged, whether by Muslim invasions and Mughal rule, the seaborne arrival of French and Portuguese adventurers and missionaries, or the encroachment of the British Empire – with its implantation of representative political institutions and modern law. [Prepared for: DefenseThreat Reduction Agency] https://fas.org/irp/agency/dod/dtra/india.pdf 6 Ramayana Artha Shastra th 7 /4th centuries BCE ~ 3rd century CE 2nd century BCE ~ 3rd century CE Plato Tirukkural 5th Century BCE 1st century BCE ~ 6th century CE Mahabharata Confucius Bhagwat Gita 551–479 BCE fifth century BCE ~second century BCE Sun Tzu 544–496 BCE 7 Kauṭilya - Vishnugupta – Chanakya 2nd century BCE ~3rd century CE The Arthashastra is a timeless and comprehensive treatise on all facets of statecraft: politics, law, economy, management of war and peace, intelligence, foreign policy, and diplomacy. 8 TIRUKKURAL The chapters on politics, ministers, state, defence, finance, army and friendship apply to all kinds of government from monarchy of Thiruvalluvar’s time down to the modern democracy. c. 1st century BC or 6th century AD 9 Ashoka the Great c. 268 BCE to 232 BCE Raja Raja Chola I 985 CE - 1014 CE 10 Scope of this lecture Past lectures have covered Indian Classical Concepts in Foreign & Security Policies, Ancient Indian thought on strategy, specific policies on sectoral subjects – and lectures following this talk will cover foreign relations with specific countries and regions. This lecture will peripherally touch upon them to illustrate the trends in policy in general. [Trends in] India’s Foreign policy – in the last seven decades – with a brief ‘mention’ of the immediate and distant past Trends? -- Continuity? -- Change? 11 Significant Mile-Stones / Dates Pre-Independence 1971 - 1977 1947 to 1964 09 August 1971 October 1962 India signs a 20-year treaty of 1962 to 1970 friendship and cooperation with the Soviet Union Apr – Sep 1965 03 December 1971 India – Pak war - 1965 Bangladesh Liberation war 30 Jun 1965 02 July 1972 Cease-fire agreement n Rann of The Shimla Agreement Kutch 10 January 1966 8 May 1974 The Tashkent Declaration Pokhran - I 12 1977 to1990 2004 to 2014 June 2005 1991 to 1996 United States -India Defence Economic Reforms Of 1991 framework agreement 26 December 1991 18 July 2005 Dissolution of The Soviet Union Joint Statement on Indo- January 1992 US nuclear deal Formal relations with Israel 2014 and beyond. 1996-1998 27 March 2019 20 June 1996 ASAT Test India rejects CTBT 1998 to 2004 11-13 May 1998 Pokhran - II 13 14 15 16 Pre-Independence As India before independence formed part of the British imperial possessions, the British Government decided her foreign policy. .... ... After she won independence India had to evolve a foreign policy of her own, devoted to her own interests. However, it would be wrong to say that before then India had no foreign policy aims apart from those of Imperial Britain. The Indian National Congress, from the time the independence movement gained strength under Gandhi's leadership, developed its own foreign policy ... Naturally it had little to do with what is strictly called international diplomacy,... …. Indian foreign policy before independence was confined to the enunciation of basic principles which would guide the country's diplomacy after independence. Acharya J. B. Kripalani "For Principled Neutrality: A New Appraisal of Indian Foreign Policy" 'Foreign Affairs', Washington (DC), Vol 38, No.1, October 1959 17 The ‘Great War’ 1914-18 18 The relations between the First World War and the Indian independence movement are complex and vital, and it is not possible to draw a direct, linear trajectory between the two. Responses to the War (India) Shantanu Das https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net 19 The Great War 28 Jul 1914 – 11 Nov 1918 20 The Great War 28 Jul 1914 – 11 Nov 1918 Over one million Indian troops served overseas. 74,187 Indian soldiers died during the war and another 67,000 were wounded. 21 The Great War 28 Jul 1914 – 11 Nov 1918 June 28, 1919 Maharaja of Bikaner at the Armistice signing to end ‘World War I’ 22 23 13,218 war dead are commemorated by name on the India Gate. 24 Teen Murti Chowk is now the “Teen Murti Haifa Chowk” The three bronze statues at Teen Murti represent the Hyderabad, Jodhpur and Mysore Lancers who were part of the 15 Imperial Service Cavalry Brigade. The brigade carried out the victorious assault on the fortified city of Haifa on September 23, 1918, during World War I. Forty-four Indian soldiers made the ultimate sacrifice during the liberation of the city in World War I. 25 Vice-President Shri Venkaiah Naidu at the Indian War Memorial at Villers Guislain, France November 10, 2018 26 World War – II 1 Sep 1939 – 2 Sep 1945 27 World War – II 1 Sep 1939 – 2 Sep 1945 The Indian National Congress, led by Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel and Maulana Azad, denounced Nazi Germany but would not fight it or anyone else until India was independent. Congress launched the Quit India Movement in August 1942, refusing to co-operate in any way with the government until independence was granted. In 1939 the British Indian Army numbered 205,000 men. It took in volunteers and by 1945 was the largest all-volunteer force in history, rising to over 2.5 million men – who participated in World War – II 87,000 Indians perished in the war 28 Over 87,000 Indian soldiers died in World War II. 29 In memory of the Men of the 2nd Division who fell in the Battle of Kohima April 1944 June 1944 30 There is no War Memorial for those 87,000 who perished between 1939 and 1945 31 United Nations 1945 32 United Nations A Ramasawmy Mudaliar Commerce Member of the Governor-General’s Executive Council and leader of Indian Delegation, signing the UN Charter 26-Jun-45 33 Indian Independence act of 1947 34 15 August 1947 35 ‘The Commonwealth of Nations’ 36 TO November 1926 28 April 1949 The UK and its Dominions The Commonwealth Heads of agree they are ‘equal in status, Government issue the in no way subordinate one to London Declaration. It allows another in any aspect of their India (and henceforth all domestic or external affairs, other members) to remain in though united by common the Commonwealth without allegiance to the Crown, and having the British monarch as freely associated as members of Head of State, creates the the British Commonwealth position of Head of the of Nations’. Commonwealth, and changes the name of the organisation to ‘the Commonwealth of Nations’. 37 London Declaration - 22 – 27 April, 1949 The Governments of the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, India, Pakistan and Ceylon, whose countries are united as Members of the British Commonwealth of Nations and owe a common allegiance to the Crown, which is also the symbol of their free association, have considered the impending constitutional changes in India. The Government of India have informed the other Governments of the Commonwealth of the intention of the Indian people that under the new constitution which is about to be adopted India shall become a sovereign independent republic. The Government of India have however declared and affirmed India’s desire to continue her full membership of the Commonwealth of Nations and her acceptance of The King as the symbol of the free association of its independent member nations and as such the Head of the Commonwealth. 38 Non - Alignment The1955 Bandung Asian-African Conference called for “abstention from the use of arrangements of collective defence to serve the particular interests of any of the big powers.” 39 The Non-Aligned Movement was thus born.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • India-Pakistan Conflict: Records of the Us State Department, February 1963
    http://gdc.gale.com/archivesunbound/ INDIA-PAKISTAN CONFLICT: RECORDS OF THE U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT, FEBRUARY 1963-1966 Over 16,000 pages of State Department Central Files on India and Pakistan from 1963 through 1966 make this collection a standard documentary resource for the study of the political relations between India and Pakistan during a crucial period in the Cold War and the shifting alliances and alignments in South Asia. Date Range: 1963-1966 Content: 15,387 images Source Library: U.S. National Archives Detailed Description: Relations with Pakistan have demanded a high proportion of India’s international energies and undoubtedly will continue to do so. India and Pakistan have divergent national ideologies and have been unable to establish a mutually acceptable power equation in South Asia. The national ideologies of pluralism, democracy, and secularism for India and of Islam for Pakistan grew out of the pre-independence struggle between the Congress and the All-India Muslim League, and in the early 1990s the line between domestic and foreign politics in India’s relations with Pakistan remained blurred. Because great-power competition—between the United States and the Soviet Union and between the Soviet Union and China—became intertwined with the conflicts between India and Pakistan, India was unable to attain its goal of insulating South Asia from global rivalries. This superpower involvement enabled Pakistan to use external force in the face of India’s superior endowments of population and resources. The most difficult problem in relations between India and Pakistan since partition in August 1947 has been their dispute over Kashmir.
    [Show full text]
  • According to the Syllabus of University of Azad Jammu & Kashmir
    LLB FIVE YEARS DEGREE PROGRAMME NOTES According to the Syllabus of University of Azad Jammu & Kashmir Muzaffarabad and Other Public, Private Sector Universities of Pakistan Prepared By Advocate Muhammad Adnan Masood Joja Sardar Javed Zahoor Khan (Advocate) CITI Law College Rawalakot 05824-442207, 444222, 0332-4573251, 051-4852737 Near CMH Rawalakot AJK Web:-www.clc.edu.pk Citi Law College, Near CMH, Rawalakot Ph: 05824-442207, 051-4852737 www.clc.edu.pk Page | 1 Citi Law College, Near CMH, Rawalakot Ph: 05824-442207, 051-4852737 www.clc.edu.pk Page | 2 Citi Law College, Near CMH, Rawalakot Ph: 05824-442207, 051-4852737 www.clc.edu.pk Page | 3 Citi Law College, Near CMH, Rawalakot Ph: 05824-442207, 051-4852737 www.clc.edu.pk Page | 4 Citi Law College, Near CMH, Rawalakot Ph: 05824-442207, 051-4852737 www.clc.edu.pk Page | 5 FUNCTIONAL ENGLISH Citi Law College, Near CMH, Rawalakot Ph: 05824-442207, 051-4852737 www.clc.edu.pk Page | 6 Parts of Speech NOUNS A noun is the word that refers to a person, thing or abstract idea. A noun can tell you who or what. There are several different types of noun: - There are common nouns such as dog, car, chair etc. Nouns that refer to things which can be counted (can be singular or plural) are countable nouns. Nouns that refer to some groups of countable nouns, substances, feelings and types of activity (can only be singular) are uncountable nouns. Nouns that refer to a group of people or things are collective nouns. Nouns that refer to people, organizations or places are proper nouns, only proper nouns are capitalized.
    [Show full text]
  • Bilateral Relations Between India and Pakistan, 1947- 1957
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Apollo THE FINALITY OF PARTITION: BILATERAL RELATIONS BETWEEN INDIA AND PAKISTAN, 1947- 1957 Pallavi Raghavan St. Johns College University of Cambridge This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Faculty of History University of Cambridge September, 2012. 1 This dissertation is the result of my own work, includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration, and falls within the word limit granted by the Board of Graduate Studies, University of Cambridge. Pallavi Raghavan 2 ABSTRACT This dissertation will focus on the history of bilateral relations between India and Pakistan. It looks at how the process of dealing with issues thrown up in the aftermath of partition shaped relations between the two countries. I focus on the debates around the immediate aftermath of partition, evacuee property disputes, border and water disputes, minorities and migration, trade between the two countries, which shaped the canvas in which the India-Pakistan relationship took shape. This is an institution- focussed history to some extent, although I shall also argue that the foreign policy establishments of both countries were also responding to the compulsions of internal politics; and the policies they advocated were also shaped by domestic political positions of the day. In the immediate months and years following partition, the suggestions of a lastingly adversarial relationship were already visible. This could be seen from not only in the eruption of the Kashmir dispute, but also in often bitter wrangling over the division of assets, over water, numerous border disputes, as well as in accusations exchanged over migration of minorities.
    [Show full text]
  • India and Pakistan
    Peacekeeping_4.qxd 1/14/07 2:29 PM Page 119 4.9 India and Pakistan The UN Military Observer Group in India and declared a unilateral cease-fire, later recipro- Pakistan (UNMOGIP) continued to oversee a cated by India. Political relations improved frequently tense situation between Indian and further in January 2004, when an agreement Pakistani forces in the Jammu and Kashmir was reached to commence a bilateral “com- region. While violence was common in the dis- posite dialogue” on an agreed range of issues, puted region during the year (though not usually including those related to Jammu-Kashmir. along the line of control that divides the forces), Numerous confidence-building measures were the 11 July 2006 terrorist attacks on India’s mass initiated, and a minisummit was held in April transit system that killed 180 in the financial 2005 to discuss the fate of Jammu-Kashmir. capital, Mumbai, temporarily dashed hopes that Following an overall decline in violent attacks the two parties would move closer to resolution through 2005, India reduced its troop levels in of their prolonged territorial dispute. Respon- Jammu and Kashmir by about 3,000. sibility for the attacks was not claimed, but sus- In a demonstration of solidarity and a pecting Pakistan’s involvement, Indian prime desire to resolve their long-standing dispute, minister Manmohan Singh postponed continua- during the September 2006 meeting of the tion of the bilateral talks aimed at normalizing Non-Aligned Movement, Pakistani president relations, which had begun in 2004. Pervez Musharraf and Indian prime minister UNMOGIP continues to observe the cease- Singh agreed to resume their bilateral talks at fire established by the Karachi Agreement, of an undisclosed date in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Alive and Kicking: the Kashmir Dispute Forty Years Later James D
    Penn State International Law Review Volume 9 Article 5 Number 1 Dickinson Journal of International Law 1991 Alive and Kicking: The Kashmir Dispute Forty Years Later James D. Howley Follow this and additional works at: http://elibrary.law.psu.edu/psilr Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Howley, James D. (1991) "Alive and Kicking: The Kashmir Dispute Forty Years Later," Penn State International Law Review: Vol. 9: No. 1, Article 5. Available at: http://elibrary.law.psu.edu/psilr/vol9/iss1/5 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by Penn State Law eLibrary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Penn State International Law Review by an authorized administrator of Penn State Law eLibrary. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Alive and Kicking: The Kashmir Dispute Forty Years Later I. Introduction The Kashmir dispute between India and Pakistan involves a struggle between two powers for the possession of a tract of territory which each wants for its own valid reasons. The stakes are of major economic, political and strategic significance to Pakistan, while to India, Kashmir has become a symbol of national prestige and inter- national justice.1 Charges of aggression and violations of interna- tional law have been asserted by both parties. In considering a solu- tion to the Kashmir dispute, it is necessary to look beyond the blatant facts and see the elements that gave rise to the dispute and the circumstances under which it occurred. A purely legalistic approach never solves large political problems. With this in mind, this Comment begins with an examina- tion of the roots of the conflict: Kashmir's economy, geography, predominantly Moslem population and Hindu ruler.
    [Show full text]
  • Submarine Warfare: with Emphasis on the 1936 London Protocol
    XVI Submarine Warfare: With Emphasis on the 1936 London Protocol The Law oj Naval Waifare: Targeting Enemy Merchant Shipping 28 (Naval War College International Law Studies No. 65, Richard]. Grunawalt ed., 1993) Part I Early History of the Submarine lthough the idea of a submersible boat dates back at least to the early A seventeenth century, and a number of efforts to perfect such a vessel had occurred over the subsequent years, it was not until the latter part of the eighteenth century that realistic attempts began to be made in this respect. During the American Revolution David Bushnell devised a one-man submersible known as the American Turtle. Its several attacks against British warships were, for one reason or another, all unsuccessful.! Then in 1797 Robert Fulton, who had been demonstrating his version ofthe submersible to the French Navy, submitted a proposal to the French Directory for the construction and the use by his "Nautulus Company" of a submarine against the ships of the British Navy. Paragraph Six of that proposal stated? And whereas fire Ships or other unusual means of destroying Navies are Considered Contrary to the Laws of war, and persons taken in such enterprises are liable to Suffer death, it will be an object of Safety if the Directory give the Nautulus Company Commissions Specifying that all persons taken in the Nautulus or Submarine Expeditio/l Shall be treated as Prisoners of War, And in Case of Violence being offered the Government will Retaliate on the British Prisoners in a four fold degree. It can thus be seen that even in its earliest form, and even when it was to be directed solely against warships, the submarine was a controversial weapon.
    [Show full text]
  • Ceasefire Violations in Jammu and Kashmir a Line on Fire
    [PEACEW RKS [ CEASEFIRE VIOLATIONS IN JAMMU AND KASHMIR A LINE ON FIRE Happymon Jacob ABOUT THE REPORT Ceasefire violations along the Line of Control and international border between India and Pakistan have over the last decade been the primary trigger of tensions and conflict between New Delhi and Islamabad in the long-disputed Kashmir region. This report, supported by the United States Institute of Peace (USIP) and based on extensive field visits to the border areas, in-depth interviews with Indian and Pakistani military officials, and several primary datasets explains the factors behind the violations and suggests ways to control them within the context of the broader bilateral political dispute. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Happymon Jacob is associate professor of diplomacy and disarmament studies at the School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. He has previously worked with the Observer Research Foundation (New Delhi), University of Jammu (J&K), Central European University (Budapest), and the Jamia Millia Islamia University (New Delhi), has participated in or organized some of the influential India-Pakistan Track II dialogues, and has written extensively on India’s foreign policy, the Kashmir conflict, India-Pakistan relations, and security issues in South Asia. Cover photo: Hindustan Times/Getty Images The views expressed in this report are those of the author(s) alone. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Institute of Peace. United States Institute of Peace 2301 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, DC 20037 Phone: 202.457.1700 Fax: 202.429.6063 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.usip.org Peaceworks No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Transatlantic Partnership Maria G
    THE TRANSATLANTIC RELATIONSHIP AND THE FUTURE GLOBAL GOVERNANCE WORKING PAPER 03 | SEPTEMBER 2012 Despite recent perceptions that the monetary policy, trade, development end of the Cold War deprived policy, amongst others, cau- the transatlantic part- sed hand-wringing in nership of its central Washington and Euro- rationale, succes- pean capitals long sive American before 9/11 and administrations The Evolution of the invasion of have faced Iraq. This is not the challen- to suggest ge of reassu- the Transatlantic that structural ring Europe- change in the an leaders international that they Partnership system, inclu- share com- ding the rise mon interests of the BRICS in the inter- and a shift in national arena. Maria G. Cowles and US interests to- Europeans have Michelle Egan ward Asia, should alternated betwe- be discounted, but en full embrace of US does warrant caution views, voicing limited di- in asserting that the tran- sagreement on certain issues, satlantic relationship is now and occasional episodes of acute discord. transitioning to an unprecedented path. Disagreements over China, nuclear strategy, Transworld is supported by the SEVENTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME The Evolution of the Transatlantic Partnership Maria G. Cowles and Michelle Egan* European integration Transatlantic relations NATO Introduction The Transworld project suggests three possible scenarios for the future of transatlantic relations: 1. The transatlantic relationship is drifting apart. 2. The transatlantic relationship is evolving along a pattern of functional cooperation. 3. The transatlantic relationship is transforming towards a different but enduring partnership. The Transworld project calls attention to this era of “global flux” in which transatlantic relations “appear to have lost their bearings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role and Future of the Commonwealth
    House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee The role and future of the Commonwealth Fourth Report of Session 2012–13 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 1 November 2012 HC 114 [Incorporating HC 1810-i, -ii and -iii, Session 2010-12] Published on 15 November 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £23.00 The Foreign Affairs Committee The Foreign Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and its associated agencies. Current membership Richard Ottaway (Conservative, Croydon South) (Chair) Rt Hon Bob Ainsworth (Labour, Coventry North East) Mr John Baron (Conservative, Basildon and Billericay) Rt Hon Sir Menzies Campbell (Liberal Democrat, North East Fife) Rt Hon Ann Clwyd (Labour, Cynon Valley) Mike Gapes (Labour/Co-op, Ilford South) Mark Hendrick (Labour/Co-op, Preston) Andrew Rosindell (Conservative, Romford) Mr Frank Roy (Labour, Motherwell and Wishaw) Rt Hon Sir John Stanley (Conservative, Tonbridge and Malling) Rory Stewart (Conservative, Penrith and The Border) The following Members were also members of the Committee during the parliament: Emma Reynolds (Labour, Wolverhampton North East) Mr Dave Watts (Labour, St Helens North) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including news items) are on the internet at www.parliament.uk/facom.
    [Show full text]
  • Valletta Harare Cyber World Trade Ottawa Fancourt Okanagan
    London Declaration CommonwealthValletta Principles Gleneagles Agreement Apartheid in Sport World Trade RespectLusaka and Racism and Racial Prejudice Okanagan UnderstandingMelbourne Goa Kuala Lumpur International Security New Delhi Economic Action Langkwai Nassau World Order Harare Southern Africa Ottawa Limassol Millbrook EconomicEdinburgh Action Cyber Commonwealth Fancourt Declarations Coolum Aso Rock Zimbabwe Vancouver Ce leb rat ing Commonwealth Declarations Commonwealth Secretariat Marlborough House Pall Mall London SW1Y 5HX United Kingdom © Commonwealth Secretariat 2019 All rights reserved. This publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or otherwise provided it is used only for education purposes and is not for resale, and provided full acknowledgement is given to the Commonwealth Secretariat as the original publisher. Wherever possible, the Commonwealth Secretariat uses paper sourced from responsible forests or from sources that minimise a destructive impact on the environment. Copies of this publication may be obtained from Commonwealth Secretariat Marlborough House Pall Mall London SW1Y 5HX United Kingdom Email: [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)20 7747 6500 Contents / iii Contents Topics v Foreword ix Declaration Signed by the Five Prime Ministers 1 London Declaration 3 Declaration by Commonwealth Prime Ministers 5 The Declaration of Commonwealth Principles 8 The Lusaka Declaration of the Commonwealth on
    [Show full text]
  • India-Pakistan Relations: the Story of Unsolved Conflicts
    ISSN: 2455-2631 © May 2017 IJSDR | Volume 2, Issue 5 INDIA-PAKISTAN RELATIONS: THE STORY OF UNSOLVED CONFLICTS Dr. Saroj Choudhary Assistant Professor ALS, Amity University Madhya Pradesh, Gwalior – 474005 INTRODUCTION Since, India became independent and divided by the British government the relationship between these two countries has been mostly unstable with ever growing distrust on each other. Both countries have fought wars in the South Asia region at different fronts and continue to face problems like border terrorist activities, infiltrations, low intensity wars and intelligence/spy operations that seem unstoppable as both will continue to consider each other as an untrustworthy enemy.1 It is seen that after the end of cold war, it has become one of the most dangerous and volatile regions in the international politics for which several reasons are responsible such as pre-independence hostility between the Muslim League and the Indian national Congress and bloodletting riots in post independence period at the time of partition. Moreover, disputes over waters flowing from India to Pakistan and finally, Kashmir which remains a subject of conflicts and bone of skirmishes between these two countries. However, there are many changes in the field of technology, global political economy and social networks took place particularly after the disintegration of Soviet Union. With this, the controversial and disappointing relationship between India and Pakistan has worsened as both have become nuclear states. In recent years, infiltration, proxy war and civilian attacks by Pakistan are increasing which is taking both states far away from the negotiation table. So many times, Pakistan took resort to International Organizations to solve the matters which in turn creates space for external powers as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping of Kashmir Conflict Under Nugget Model
    114 MAPPING OF KASHMIR CONFLICT UNDER NUGGET MODEL Maham Javed * Abstract The flawed and awfully-crafted Partition Formula applied by the British in the Subcontinent (in 1947) sowed the seeds of conflict between India and Pakistan while leaving the State of Jammu and Kashmir in gloominess. Consequently, both countries soon indulged in an armed conflict known as the ‘Kashmir Conflict’ due to which this whole region has remained volatile and subjected to instability. India’s illegal occupation of Muslim-majority areas of Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK), a complete denial of the Right of Self-determination to innocent Kashmiris (a clear violation of the UNSC resolutions), and the abolition of Kashmiris’ Special Status through hasty constitutional amendments (a clear reflection of Hindutva mindset) indicate afresh rise to indigenous struggle in IIOJK. For that matter, India is cunningly engaged in false propaganda campaigns against Pakistan, in which it blames Pakistan for providing support to Kashmiri freedom fighters. India’s irresponsible State-behaviour is quite evident from recent occurrences like Pulwama incident and release of Indian pilot, Wing Commander Abhinandan Virthaman, by Pakistan. In such a tense regional setting, this paper examines the historical aspect of the Kashmir conflict while discussing different related issues between Pakistan and India by using the Nugget Model. This conflict-analysis tool helps an in- depth understanding of the Kashmir conflict and leads to identify root causes that are accelerating the conflict day-by-day. Keywords: Kashmir, Right of Self-determination, Freedom, Human Rights, Nugget Model. Introduction ashmir has been an unresolved dispute between Pakistan and India since the K partition of the Subcontinent in 1947.
    [Show full text]