India and Pakistan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

India and Pakistan Peacekeeping_4.qxd 1/14/07 2:29 PM Page 119 4.9 India and Pakistan The UN Military Observer Group in India and declared a unilateral cease-fire, later recipro- Pakistan (UNMOGIP) continued to oversee a cated by India. Political relations improved frequently tense situation between Indian and further in January 2004, when an agreement Pakistani forces in the Jammu and Kashmir was reached to commence a bilateral “com- region. While violence was common in the dis- posite dialogue” on an agreed range of issues, puted region during the year (though not usually including those related to Jammu-Kashmir. along the line of control that divides the forces), Numerous confidence-building measures were the 11 July 2006 terrorist attacks on India’s mass initiated, and a minisummit was held in April transit system that killed 180 in the financial 2005 to discuss the fate of Jammu-Kashmir. capital, Mumbai, temporarily dashed hopes that Following an overall decline in violent attacks the two parties would move closer to resolution through 2005, India reduced its troop levels in of their prolonged territorial dispute. Respon- Jammu and Kashmir by about 3,000. sibility for the attacks was not claimed, but sus- In a demonstration of solidarity and a pecting Pakistan’s involvement, Indian prime desire to resolve their long-standing dispute, minister Manmohan Singh postponed continua- during the September 2006 meeting of the tion of the bilateral talks aimed at normalizing Non-Aligned Movement, Pakistani president relations, which had begun in 2004. Pervez Musharraf and Indian prime minister UNMOGIP continues to observe the cease- Singh agreed to resume their bilateral talks at fire established by the Karachi Agreement, of an undisclosed date in the future. UNMOGIP 27 July 1949, despite India’s official position continues to provide on-the-ground observa- that UNMOGIP has had no operational role to tion, but its ability to contribute to a further play since the signing of the 1972 Simla easing of tension in the Kashmir region re- Agreement, which established a line of control mains limited. The mission’s status is likely to (LOC) separating the two armies and specified remain unchanged for the foreseeable future. that the parties should resolve their differences bilaterally. The mission monitors the 1972 LOC, which has only been slightly revised since the 1949 Karachi Agreement. Over the UN Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan (UNMOGIP) years, India has restricted somewhat the activ- ities and movement of UNMOGIP observers • Authorization date 21 April 1948 (UNSC Res. 47) on its side of the LOC by requiring them to • Start date 1 January 1949 travel in Indian army convoys, and has re- • Chief military observer Major General Dragutin Repinc (Croatia) jected proposals for the UN to play a mediat- • Budget $7.9 million (1 January– ing role in the conflict. Despite this resistance, 31 December 2006) • Strength as of Military observers: 44 both governments have continued to provide 30 September 2006 International civilian staff: 22 UNMOGIP with accommodation, transporta- Local civilian staff: 47 tion, and security. Following tensions in 2003 that raised the For detailed mission information see p. 342. prospect of nuclear confrontation, Pakistan 119 Peacekeeping_4.qxd 1/14/07 2:29 PM Page 120 120 • MISSION NOTES Box 4.9.1 Nepal The handover of authority from Nepal’s In response to the increased violence a mission to oversee the rebel canton- King Gyanendra to parliament during and restrictions placed on personal free- ment, management of arms, and the 2006 marked the end of both the Hindu doms, the UN Office of the High Com- overall peace process. The letter also re- monarchy’s grip on Nepal’s governing missioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), quested that the UN continue its human structures, and ten years of conflict with the consent of the Nepalese govern- rights monitoring, as well as oversee the between the Royal Armed Forces of ment, established a monitoring office in twenty-five-point code of conduct agreed Nepal and the country’s Maoist rebel Nepal in April 2005. Ian Martin was to by the two sides in anticipation of movement. To help sort out continuing appointed Personal Representative of the June 2007 elections. differences over disarmament and reinte- High Commissioner in Nepal. Ian Martin was subsequently gration, in August 2006 the new interim After further violence and protests, appointed Personal Representative of the government and the rebels jointly seven political opposition parties formed Secretary-General, supported by a small requested the United Nations to provide an alliance that brought about the rein- team of administrators. His first task a wide-ranging assistance package. statement of parliament on 24 April was to determine how the UN could In February 2005, King Gyanendra 2006. The opposition alliance then called contribute most effectively to Nepal’s dissolved Nepal’s parliament in an effort off protests and established an interim postconflict evolution. On 21 November to stifle political opposition and crush government, headed by Prime Minister 2006, the Maoists and the government the Maoist insurgency. This move was Girija Prasad Koirala. On 16 June 2006, agreed to a peace deal in which the followed by a wave of guerrilla attacks the Maoist rebels agreed to a three- Maoists would join the parliament and and political protests, which were met month cease-fire and joined the interim their weapons would be locked up and with an upsurge in arrests by the king’s government in peace talks aimed at com- monitored by the UN. emergency-rule government as well as pletely ending the decade-long conflict. With the first group of mission per- widespread human rights violations. The In August 2006, Secretary-General sonnel starting to arrive in late Decem- king lifted emergency rule on 30 April Kofi Annan dispatched a week-long ber, a second assessment team was sent 2005, but the gesture did little to calm assessment mission to Nepal, led by to plan for a full-fledged UN mission to the situation, as Nepal’s parliament was Staffan de Mistura. Following the mis- support the peace process. not reinstated and questions regarding sion’s return, Annan received identical the constitutional power of the monar- letters from the interim government and chy went unanswered. Maoist rebels, inviting the UN to dispatch.
Recommended publications
  • India-Pakistan Conflict: Records of the Us State Department, February 1963
    http://gdc.gale.com/archivesunbound/ INDIA-PAKISTAN CONFLICT: RECORDS OF THE U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT, FEBRUARY 1963-1966 Over 16,000 pages of State Department Central Files on India and Pakistan from 1963 through 1966 make this collection a standard documentary resource for the study of the political relations between India and Pakistan during a crucial period in the Cold War and the shifting alliances and alignments in South Asia. Date Range: 1963-1966 Content: 15,387 images Source Library: U.S. National Archives Detailed Description: Relations with Pakistan have demanded a high proportion of India’s international energies and undoubtedly will continue to do so. India and Pakistan have divergent national ideologies and have been unable to establish a mutually acceptable power equation in South Asia. The national ideologies of pluralism, democracy, and secularism for India and of Islam for Pakistan grew out of the pre-independence struggle between the Congress and the All-India Muslim League, and in the early 1990s the line between domestic and foreign politics in India’s relations with Pakistan remained blurred. Because great-power competition—between the United States and the Soviet Union and between the Soviet Union and China—became intertwined with the conflicts between India and Pakistan, India was unable to attain its goal of insulating South Asia from global rivalries. This superpower involvement enabled Pakistan to use external force in the face of India’s superior endowments of population and resources. The most difficult problem in relations between India and Pakistan since partition in August 1947 has been their dispute over Kashmir.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of UN Peace Operations Reform: an Implementation Scorecard
    NOVEMBER 2016 The State of UN Peace Operations Reform: An Implementation Scorecard ARTHUR BOUTELLIS AND LESLEY CONNOLLY Cover Photo: Secretary-General Ban Ki- ABOUT THE AUTHORS moon with Secretary-General-designate António Guterres, just before the ARTHUR BOUTELLIS is Director of the International Peace General Assembly meeting appointing Institute’s Brian Urquhart Center for Peace Operations. Guterres by acclamation as the next UN secretary-general, United Nations, New Email: [email protected] York, October 13, 2016. UN Photo/Evan Schneider. LESLEY CONNOLLY is a Research Assistant at the International Peace Institute’s Brian Urquhart Center for Disclaimer: The views expressed in this paper represent those of the authors Peace Operations. and not necessarily those of the International Peace institute. IPI welcomes consideration of a wide range of perspectives in the pursuit of ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS a well-informed debate on critical The authors would like to thank all those who shared their policies and issues in international affairs. insights in interviews conducted in New York and at various roundtables and workshops on the implementation of the IPI Publications recommendations of the High-Level Independent Panel on Adam Lupel, Vice President Peace Operations (HIPPO). Albert Trithart, Assistant Editor The authors are particularly grateful to those who provided Madeline Brennan, Assistant Production Editor advice and feedback on various earlier drafts of the HIPPO Scorecard, including Christian Burckhardt, Cedric de Suggested Citation: Coning, Dirk Druet, Michael Grant, Michele Griffin, Youssef Arthur Boutellis and Lesley Connolly, “The State of UN Peace Operations Mahmoud, Renato Mariani, Ian Martin, Delphine Mechoulan, Reform: An Implementation Scorecard,” Naomi Miyashita, Jang-ho Park, Halvor Sætre, Adam Smith, New York: International Peace Institute, and Dawit Yirga.
    [Show full text]
  • The Popular Consultation and the United Nations Mission in East Timor
    Out of the Ashes: Destruction and Reconstruction of East Timor Abstract for chapter 8 Author: Ian Martin ‘The popular consultation and the United Nations Mission in East Timor (UNAMET) – first reflections’ is a personal account by the Head of UNAMET of the process which allowed East Timor to hold a popular consultation to determine its future. The author begins with the Agreement of 5 May 1999 which provided that if the East Timorese rejected the proposed autonomy, there would be a peaceful and orderly transfer of authority to the UN, enabling East Timor to begin a process of transition to independence. This process started with the establishment and deployment of UNAMET which oversaw a total of 446 666 registered people voting. Prior to the ballot UNAMET attempted to get the opposing factions to ‘lay down their arms’, but the level of violence after the ballot was so great that UNAMET was forced to retreat, handing over responsibility to UNTAET. The death and destruction in East Timor after the ballot provoked various questions which the author responds to, arguing that violence would have been reduced if the popular consultation had taken place with an armed international presence mandated to guarantee security. Keywords autonomy, B. J. Habibie, ballot, CNRT, Dili, Falintil, General Wiranto, human rights violations, IDP, independence, INTERFET, intimidation, militia, MPR, popular consultation, Secretary-General, Security Council, TNI, UNAMET, United Nations, UNTAET Xanana Gusmão Published by ANU E Press, 2003 8 The popular consultation and the United Nations mission in East Timor – first reflections Ian Martin1 On 22 October 1999, Xanana Gusmão, the independence fighter who had assumed the leadership of a seemingly broken Falintil two decades before, who had been captured by the Indonesian army in 1992 and sentenced to life imprisonment, returned to East Timor.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2014
    ANNUAL REPORT 2014 ANNUALREPORT2013.indd 1 11/11/2014 10:50:45 FABIAN EXECUTIVE 2013-14 Jessica Asato Chair, Fabian Society ur aim for the Fabian Society this year was to provide to the Executive for providing support and challenge, to Vice- ballast to underpin the Labour Party’s policy review and Chairs Kate Green MP and Steve Race, and to David Chaplin for Oto keep radical thinking at the heart of our deliberations his sure-footed managing of the budget. Thanks too to General on the left. The small, but dedicated team in our new offices in Secretary Andy Harrop and his Deputy Marcus Roberts for their Petty France haven’t disappointed. Influential reports such as unstinting work towards a better progressive future. Let’s hope Measure for Measure challenged the underlying measures of eco- next year brings not just a Labour government, but a new era of nomic success which failed to prevent the economic crisis, while radical progressive thinking in our politics. the Future Spending Choices Commission set out practical steps for reducing the deficit. FABIAN SOCIETY EXECUTIVE In turn, the media coverage of Fabian reports and events 2013-14 has burgeoned, ensuring we remain one of the most influential centre-left think tanks in the UK. It’s a good reminder in our 130th year of how powerful the practical application of ideas Jessica Asato (Chair) can be. We’re also proud to provide a space for interventions by Shadow Cabinet Ministers as they reach for the policies which Kate Green MP (Vice Chair) could help to catapult Labour back into government and are Steve Race (Vice Chair) pleased to have working closely with Labour’s Policy Review Chair, Jon Cruddas MP.
    [Show full text]
  • According to the Syllabus of University of Azad Jammu & Kashmir
    LLB FIVE YEARS DEGREE PROGRAMME NOTES According to the Syllabus of University of Azad Jammu & Kashmir Muzaffarabad and Other Public, Private Sector Universities of Pakistan Prepared By Advocate Muhammad Adnan Masood Joja Sardar Javed Zahoor Khan (Advocate) CITI Law College Rawalakot 05824-442207, 444222, 0332-4573251, 051-4852737 Near CMH Rawalakot AJK Web:-www.clc.edu.pk Citi Law College, Near CMH, Rawalakot Ph: 05824-442207, 051-4852737 www.clc.edu.pk Page | 1 Citi Law College, Near CMH, Rawalakot Ph: 05824-442207, 051-4852737 www.clc.edu.pk Page | 2 Citi Law College, Near CMH, Rawalakot Ph: 05824-442207, 051-4852737 www.clc.edu.pk Page | 3 Citi Law College, Near CMH, Rawalakot Ph: 05824-442207, 051-4852737 www.clc.edu.pk Page | 4 Citi Law College, Near CMH, Rawalakot Ph: 05824-442207, 051-4852737 www.clc.edu.pk Page | 5 FUNCTIONAL ENGLISH Citi Law College, Near CMH, Rawalakot Ph: 05824-442207, 051-4852737 www.clc.edu.pk Page | 6 Parts of Speech NOUNS A noun is the word that refers to a person, thing or abstract idea. A noun can tell you who or what. There are several different types of noun: - There are common nouns such as dog, car, chair etc. Nouns that refer to things which can be counted (can be singular or plural) are countable nouns. Nouns that refer to some groups of countable nouns, substances, feelings and types of activity (can only be singular) are uncountable nouns. Nouns that refer to a group of people or things are collective nouns. Nouns that refer to people, organizations or places are proper nouns, only proper nouns are capitalized.
    [Show full text]
  • International Organizations
    INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY (E.S.A.) Headquarters: 8–10 Rue Mario Nikis, 75738 Paris, CEDEX 15, France phone 011–33–1–5369–7654, fax 011–33–1–5369–7651 Chairman of the Council.—Alain Bensoussan (France). Director General.—Antonio Rodota (Italy). Member Countries: Austria Germany Portugal Belgium Ireland Spain Denmark Italy Sweden Finland Netherlands Switzerland France Norway United Kingdom Cooperative Agreement.—Canada. European Space Operations Center (E.S.O.C.), Robert Bosch-Strasse 5, 61, Darmstadt, Germany, phone 011–49–6151–900, telex: 419453, fax 011–49–6151–90495. European Space Research and Technology Center (E.S.T.E.C.), Keplerlaan 1, 2201, AZ Noordwijk, Zh, Netherlands, phone 011–31–71–565–6565; Telex: 844–39098, fax 011–31–71–565–6040. Information Retrieval Service (E.S.R.I.N.), Via Galileo Galilei, Casella Postale 64, 00044 Frascati, Italy. Phone, 011–39–6–94–18–01; Telex: 610637, fax 011–39–94–180361. Washington Office (E.S.A.), Suite 7800, 955 L’Enfant Plaza SW. 20024. Head of Office.—I.W. Pryke, 488–4158, fax: (202) 488–4930, [email protected]. INTER-AMERICAN DEFENSE BOARD 2600 16th Street 20441, phone 939–6041, fax 939–6620 Chairman.—MG Carl H. Freeman, U.S. Army. Vice Chairman.—Brigadier General Jose´ Mayo, Air Force, Paraguay. Secretary.—Col. Robert P. Warrick, U.S. Air Force. Vice Secretary.—CDR Carlos Luis Rivera Cordova, Navy. Deputy Secretary for Administration.—LTC Frederick J. Holland, U.S. Army. Conference.—Maj. Robert L. Larson, U.S. Army. Finance.—Maj. Stephen D. Zacharczyk, U.S. Army. Information Management.—Maj.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H6027
    July 21, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð HOUSE H6027 work to ensure that taxpayers receive their Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance wise interfere with any intellectual property refunds in the year 2000. of my time. law or policy of any country in Africa or The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under Mr. HOYER. Mr. Speaker, I yield Asia (including Israel) that is designed to the rule, the gentleman from Massa- back the balance of my time. make pharmaceuticals more affordable if such law or policy, as the case may be, com- chusetts (Mr. OLVER) will be recognized The SPEAKER pro tempore. Without plies with the Agreement on Trade-Related for 30 minutes, and the gentleman from objection, the previous question is or- Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights re- Arizona (Mr. KOLBE) will be recognized dered on the motion to instruct. ferred to in section 101(d)(15) of the Uruguay for 30 minutes. There was no objection. Round Agreements Act (19 U.S.C. 3511(d)(15)). Mr. OLVER. Mr. Speaker, as my col- The SPEAKER pro tempore. The The CHAIRMAN. Pursuant to House leagues can see, I have been filling in question is on the motion to instruct. resolution 247, the gentleman from here. So I ask unanimous consent to The motion was agreed to. Vermont (Mr. SANDERS) and the gen- hand the time over to the gentleman A motion to reconsider was laid on tleman from Connecticut (Mr. GEJDEN- from Maryland (Mr. HOYER), my distin- the table. SON) each will control 5 minutes. guished ranking member. GENERAL LEAVE The Chair recognizes the gentleman The SPEAKER pro tempore.
    [Show full text]
  • Bilateral Relations Between India and Pakistan, 1947- 1957
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Apollo THE FINALITY OF PARTITION: BILATERAL RELATIONS BETWEEN INDIA AND PAKISTAN, 1947- 1957 Pallavi Raghavan St. Johns College University of Cambridge This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Faculty of History University of Cambridge September, 2012. 1 This dissertation is the result of my own work, includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration, and falls within the word limit granted by the Board of Graduate Studies, University of Cambridge. Pallavi Raghavan 2 ABSTRACT This dissertation will focus on the history of bilateral relations between India and Pakistan. It looks at how the process of dealing with issues thrown up in the aftermath of partition shaped relations between the two countries. I focus on the debates around the immediate aftermath of partition, evacuee property disputes, border and water disputes, minorities and migration, trade between the two countries, which shaped the canvas in which the India-Pakistan relationship took shape. This is an institution- focussed history to some extent, although I shall also argue that the foreign policy establishments of both countries were also responding to the compulsions of internal politics; and the policies they advocated were also shaped by domestic political positions of the day. In the immediate months and years following partition, the suggestions of a lastingly adversarial relationship were already visible. This could be seen from not only in the eruption of the Kashmir dispute, but also in often bitter wrangling over the division of assets, over water, numerous border disputes, as well as in accusations exchanged over migration of minorities.
    [Show full text]
  • LSE 2030: Priorities and Benefits Reducing and Preventing Homelessness – LSE’S Programme to Improve People’S Lives
    Issue 20, Summer 2019 Celebrating volunteering and philanthropy at LSE LSE 2030: Priorities and benefits Reducing and preventing homelessness – LSE’s programme to improve people’s lives LSE Alumni Centre opens – a home on campus for our global network Contents LSE 2030 strategy Student projects launched 4 and partnerships 19 Regular giving support for Students’ Union fund 20 Enhanced prospects Undergraduates and faculty benefit from alumni Research for the world gift funded research assistant programme 6 Reducing and preventing homelessness Housing Plus Academy boosted by The Mitchell Trust LSE for everyone 7 Successful health policy impact 12 Engaging alumni to shape the future Impact of IGC partnership with The Rockefeller Alumni and friends are an integral part of Foundation in Sierra Leone LSE 2030 8 Tackling violence against women 13 Global alumni news Centre for Women, Peace and Security’s digital Staying connected, building networks and resource development made possible by Joseph maintaining links with LSE Rowntree Charitable Trust grant 14 Alumni Centre opens 8 Obstetric care access A campus hub for our global network of alumni AXA Research Fund fellowship supports strategic and friends policy in Nigeria Convening in London Educate for impact 16 Marshall Building 9 Philanthropy and scholarships Highlighting the sports and arts facilities that The tremendous impact of support for students will be offered alongside outstanding academic, teaching and research spaces Legacy commitments 10 Sharing the benefit of an LSE education £1m awarded by Wolfson Foundation 18 to the Centre Building Helping to enhance the LSE education experience 2 Dear Friends I am delighted to share with you the 2019 issue of Impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Amb R. Rajagopalan on India's Foreign Policy
    India’s Foreign Policy A Panorama Some Vignettes from the Past and the Present R. Rajagopalan August 9, 2019 1 What is Foreign Policy? The policy of a sovereign state in its interaction with other sovereign states 2 A country's foreign policy, consists of self- interest strategies chosen by the state to safeguard its national interests * and to achieve goals within its international relations milieu. [* May include values, ideologies and traditions] 3 Foreign Policy & Diplomacy General objectives that guide the activities and relationships of one state in its interactions with other states. The development of foreign policy is influenced by domestic considerations,, the policies or behaviour of other states, or plans to advance specific geopolitical designs. Diplomacy is the tool of foreign policy, and war, alliances, and international trade may all be manifestations of it. 4 Strategic Culture in India The Lament The debate about the existence of strategic culture in India, views are often rudimentary and impulsive rather than based on an objective definition and understanding. The main reason for this is a lack of research and availability of literature on these dimensions . ... .An awareness of the distinction and essential relationship between strategic thinking (philosophical and intellectual discourse) and strategic culture (experience, action, attitude and habit) is also important in the process of this investigation. IDSA Conference on ‘Exploring the Roots of India's Strategic Culture’, October 5, 2017 -Concept note 5 India’s Strategic Culture Rodney W. Jones India’s strategic culture is not monolithic, rather is mosaic-like, but as a composite is more distinct and coherent than that of most contemporary nation- states.This is due to its substantial continuity with the symbolism of pre-modern Indian state systems and threads of Hindu or Vedic civilization dating back several millennia.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2017-2018 Issue
    We are delighted to turn more applications from under- represented students into offers. Minouche Shafik, new Director of LSE, on the School’s successes in Widening Participation p4 Issue 17, Winter 2017/18 Celebrating volunteering and philanthropy at LSE FOCUS ON HIGHLIGHTS: Arena: combating WIDENING disinformation in the Expanding horizons: information age p14 PARTICIPATION: Annual Fund Study LSE leads the way in Abroad travel LSE Supporter Roll social mobility p4 bursaries p10 2016/17 p23 LSE and Sutton Trust Sustainable economic partner in providing growth through evidence- Pathways p6 based research: the IGC in India p12 1 Contents REALISING POTENTIAL: FOCUS ON WIDENING PARTICIPATION LSE leads the way in social mobility p4 Alison Wetherfield Foundation supports lawyers of the future p5 LSE and Sutton Trust partner in providing Pathways p6 Hammering out a new world – the Fabian Window at LSE p7 Scholarship news p7 VOLUNTEERING Alumni news p8 My LSE story: Manuel Geggus, vice-president of the German Friends of LSE p9 ANNUAL FUND Expanding horizons: Annual Fund Study Abroad travel bursaries p10 Annual Fund breaks £1 million barrier again p11 Cover story: LSE leads the way in social mobility p4 RESEARCH INNOVATION Sustainable economic growth through evidence-based research and policy p12 IGC in India p13 Arena: combating disinformation in the information age p14 THOUGHT LEADERSHIP My LSE story: Manuel Geggus (second from right), Kuwait Programme celebrates vice-president of the 10th anniversary with five-year German Friends of LSE p9
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching About International Organization
    Table of Contents PREFACE I. THE UNITED NATIONS: INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION PERSPECTIVES INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS ...................................................................................................... 9 Chadwick F. Alger PROSEMINAR IN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION AND INTEGRATION ............................................... 16 Harold K. Jacobson INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION ..................................................................................................... 19 W. Andy Knight INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS .................................................................................................... 23 M.J. Peterson THE UNITED NATIONS AND CHANGING WORLD POLITICS ............................................................... 27 Thomas G. Weiss II. THE UNITED NATIONS: INTERNATIONAL LEGAL PERSPECTIVES CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN INTERNATIONAL LAW ............................................................................. 33 Jarat Chopra INTERNATIONAL LAW AND ORGANIZATION ..................................................................................... 36 Lawrence S. Finkelstein SELECTED PROBLEMS IN THE WORK OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS: ....................................... 40 PROBLEMS OF MONITORING COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS Gregory H. Fox, Thomas M. Franck, and Paul C. Szasz INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS .................................................................................................... 47 Steven Ratner PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]